Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
“In science there is only physics; all the rest is stamp collecting.” ( Lord Kelvin)
“In physics, you don't have to go around making trouble for yourself - nature
does it for you.” ( Frank Wilczek )
“In science, "fact" can only mean "confirmed to such a degree that it would be
perverse to withhold provisional assent." I suppose that apples might start to rise
tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms.”
(Stephen Jay Gould )
Funny:
Magnetism, as you recall from physics class, is a powerful force that causes
certain items to be attracted to refrigerators. (Dave Barry )
An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually winning over
and converting its opponents: What does happen is that the opponents gradually
die out.
Scientists tell us that the fastest animal on earth, with a top speed of 120 ft/sec,
is a cow that has been dropped out of a helicopter.
A hydrogen atom is walking down the street with a friend when he suddenly
stops.
The friend says, "What's wrong?"
The hydrogen atom replys, "I lost my electron!"
The friend says, "Are you sure?"
The hydrogen atom exclaims, "Yes, I'm positive."
The friend laments, "Oh, I thought you were just being negative again."
Despre experimente:
Upon entering a laboratory, you see an experiment. How do you know which
class it belongs to?
Answer:
If it's green and wiggles, it's biology.
If it stinks, it's chemistry.
If it doesn't work, it's physics.
In any collection of data, the figure most obviously correct, beyond all need of
checking, is the mistake.
A few months in the laboratory can save a few hours in the library.
No experiment is reproducible.
In the school I went to, they asked a kid to prove the law of gravity and he threw
the teacher out of the window.
No matter what the experiment's result, there will always be someone eager to:
(a) misinterpret it. (b) fake it. or (c) believe it supports his own pet theory.
Stories…:
"You tie a long piece of string to the neck of the barometer, then lower the
barometer from the roof of the skyscraper to the ground. The length of the string
plus the length of the barometer will equal the height of the building."
This highly original answer so incensed the examiner that the student was failed
immediately. He appealed on the grounds that his answer was indisputably
correct, and the university appointed an independent arbiter to decide the case.
The arbiter judged that the answer was indeed correct, but did not display any
noticeable knowledge of physics. To resolve the problem it was decided to call
the student in and allow him six minutes in which to provide a verbal answer
which showed at least a minimal familiarity with the basic principles of physics.
For five minutes the student sat in silence, forehead creased in thought. The
arbiter reminded him that time was running out, to which the student replied that
he had several extremely relevant answers, but couldn't make up his mind which
to use. On being advised to hurry up the student replied as follows:
"Firstly, you could take the barometer up to the roof of the skyscraper, drop it
over the edge, and measure the time it takes to reach the ground. The height of
the building can then be worked out from the formula H = 0.5g x t squared. But
bad luck on the barometer.
"Or if the sun is shining you could measure the height of the barometer, then set
it on end and measure the length of its shadow. Then you measure the length of
the skyscraper's shadow, and thereafter it is a simple matter of proportional
arithmetic to work uut the height of the skyscraper.
"But if you wanted to be highly scientific about it, you could tie a short piece of
string to the barometer and swing it like a pendulum, first at ground level and
then on the roof of the skyscraper. The height is worked out by the difference in
the gravitational restoring force T = 2 pi sqrroot (l/g).
"If you merely wanted to be boring and orthodox about it, of course, you could
use the barometer to measure the air pressure on the roof of the skyscraper and
on the ground, and convert the difference in millibars into feet to give the height
of the building.
The student was Nils Bohr, the first Dane to win the Nobel prize for Physics.
*****
A thermodynamics professor had written a take home exam for his graduate
students. It had one question:
First, we postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. If they
do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving
into hell and at what rate are souls leaving?
I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave.
Therefore, no souls are leaving.
As for souls entering hell, lets look at the different religions that exist in the
world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their
religion, you will go to hell. Since, there are more than one of these religions and
people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people
and all souls go to hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in
hell to increase exponentially.
Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle's Law states that in
order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the
mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant.
So, if hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell,
then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose.
Of course, if hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell,
than the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.