Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Continuous Groups
Lectures on Symmetries in Physics – SL(N, C); SO(N ); SU(N ); SO(N, M )
– Useful Matrix Relations in GL(N, C)
– Generators and Exponential rep of Groups
Apostolos Pilaftsis [ Examples: SO(2), U(1), SO(3), SU(2) ]
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester,
Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
http://pilaftsi.home.cern.ch/pilaftsi/ 4. Lie Algebra and Lie Groups
– Generators of a Group as Basis Vectors of a Lie Algebra
0. Literature – The Adjoint Representation
– Group Theory as the Calculus of Symmetries in Physics – Normalization of Generators and Casimir Operators
2
7. Lagrangians in Field Theory
• Literature
– Variational Principle and Equation of Motion
– Lagrangians for the Klein-Gordon and Maxwell equations In order of relevance and difficulty:
– Lagrangian for the Dirac equation
1. H.F. Jones: Groups, Representations and Physics (IOP,
8. Gauge Groups 1998) Second Edition
– Global and Local Symmetries. 2. L.H. Ryder, Quantum Field Theory (CUP, 1996) Second
– Gauge Invariance of the QED Lagrangian Edition
– Noether’s Theorem
– Yang–Mills Theories 3. T.-P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Gauge Theory of Elementary
Particle Physics (OUP, 1984).
9. The Geometry of Gauge Transformations (Trans)
4. S. Pokorski, Gauge Field Theories (CUP, 2000) Second
– Parallel Transport and Covariant Derivative Edition.
– Topology of the Vacuum: the Bohm–Aharanov Effect
5. J. Wess and J. Bagger, Supersymmetry and Supergravity,
10. Supersymmetry (SUSY) (Princeton University Press, 1992) Second Edition
– Graded Lie Algebra
– Generators of the Super-Poincaré Group
– The Wess–Zumino Model
– Feynman rules
3 4
A list of related problems from H.F. Jones:
1. Introduction to Group Theory
1. 2.5, 2.9, 2.12∗
– Definition of a Group G
2. 3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6
A group (G, ·) is a set of elements {a, b, c . . .} endowed with
3. 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 a composition law · that has the following properties:
4. 9.1
(i) Closure. ∀ a, b ∈ G, the element c = a · b ∈ G.
5. 8.1, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8∗, 8.9∗
(ii) Associativity. ∀ a, b, c ∈ G, it holds a · (b · c) = (a · b) · c
6. 10.1, 10.2, 10.3
8. 11.3, 11.5, 11.7, 11.8 (iv) The inverse element a−1 of a. ∀ a ∈ G, ∃ a−1 ∈ G:
a · a−1 = a−1 · a = e.
Note that more problems as exercises are included in these
notes. If a · b = b · a, ∀ a, b ∈ G, the group G is called Abelian.
5 6
– Cosets and Coset Decomposition – Normal Subgroup H and Quotient Group G/H
Coset. Let H = {h1, h2, . . . , hr } be a proper (i.e. H ̸= G Conjugate to H. If H is a subgroup of G, then the set
and H ̸= I = {e}) subgroup of G. H ′ = gHg −1 = {gh1g −1, gh2g −1, . . . , ghr g −1}, for a given
For a given g ∈ G, the sets g ∈ G, is called g-conjugate to H or simply conjugate to H.
The set of all distinct cosets, {H, g1H, . . . , gν−1H}, is a where giH, gj H ∈ G/H. Then, it can be shown that (G/H, ·)
manifold, the coset space, and is denoted by G/H. is a group and is termed quotient group.
7 8
– Morphisms between Groups
2. Group Representations (Reps)
Group Homorphism. If (A, ·) and (B, ⋆) are two groups,
then group homorphism is a functional mapping f from the – Definition of a Vector Space V
set A into the set B, i.e. each element of a ∈ A is mapped A vector space V over the field of complex numbers C is
into a single element of b = f (a) ∈ B, such that the following a set of elements {vi}, endowed with two operations (+, ·),
multiplication law is preserved: satisfying the following properties:
9 10
– Definition of a Group Rep. – Reducible and Irreducible Reps.
Group Rep. A group representation T , Reducible rep. A group rep. T (g) is said to be (completely)
reducible, if there exists a non-singular matrix M ∈ GL (N, C)
T : g → T (g) ∈ GL (N, C) ∀g ∈ G , independent of the group elements, such that
⎛ ⎞
is a homomorphism of the elements g of a group (G, ·) into T1(g) 0 ··· 0
the group GL(N, C) of non-singular linear tranformations of ⎜ 0 T2(g) .. ⎟
M T (g) M −1 ⎜
= ⎝ . ⎟ ∀g ∈ G.
a vector space V of dimension N , i.e. the set of N × N - . ... 0 ⎠
dimensional invertible matrices in C. 0 ··· 0 Tr (g)
In addition, homomorphism implies that the group
multiplication is preserved: T1(g), T2(g), . . . , Tr (g) !
divide T into reps. of lower
r
dimensions, i.e. dim (T ) = i=1 dim (Ti), and is denoted
T (g1 · g2) = T (g1) T (g2) . by the direct sum:
··· (
T (g) = T1(g) ⊕ T2(g) ⊕ · · · ⊕ Tr (g) = T(i) .
Two reps. T1 and T2 are equivalent if there exists an ⊕
isomorphism (1 : 1 correspondance) between T1 and T2.
Such an equivalence is denoted as T1 ∼
= T2, or T1 ∼ T2.
Two equivalent reps may be related by a similarity trans. S: Irreducible rep (Irrep). A group rep. T (g) which cannot be
T1(g) = ST2(g)S −1 ∀g ∈ G and S independent of g. written as a direct sum of other reps. is called irreducible.
···
Character χ of a rep T of a group G is defined as the
set
! of all traces of the matrices T (g): χ = {χ(g)/χ(g) =
i [T (g)]ii ∧ g ∈ G}.
11 12
– Direct Products and Clebsch–Gordan Series Clebsch–Gordan Series
Direct Product of Groups. If (A, ·) = ({a1, a2, . . . , an}, ·) If g1 = g2 = g, then the symmetry of the product group
and (B, ⋆) = ({b1, b2, . . . , bm}, ⋆) are two groups with G × G is reduced to its diagonal G, i.e. G × G → G.
composition laws · and ⋆, respectively,
then a new direct-product group (G, ⊙) = (A×B, ⊙) can be In this case, D(a)(g) ⊗ D(b)(g) may not be an irrep and can
uniquely defined with elements g = a ⊗ b. The multiplication be further decomposed into a direct sum of irreps of G:
law ⊙ in G is defined as (
D(a)(g) ⊗ D(b)(g) = ac D(c)(g) .
(a1 ⊗ b1) ⊙ (a2 ⊗ b2) ≡ (a1 · a2) ⊗ (b1 ⋆ b2) . ⊕
13 14
3. Continuous Groups – Useful Matrix Relations in GL(N, C)
Definitions:
– SL(N, C); SO(N ); SU(N ); SO(N, M )
(∞
M Mn
(i) e ≡ ;
Group Properties No. of indep. Remarks n=0
n!
parameters ∞
(
n+1 (M − 1)n
(ii) ln M ≡ (−1)
GL(N, C) detM ̸= 0 2N 2
General rep n=1
n
)1
−1
SL(N, C) detM = 1 2(N 2 − 1) SL(N, C) = du (M − 1) [u(M − 1) + 1] ,
⊂ GL(N, C)
0
!N
O(N, R) i=1 (xi)2 1
2 N (N − 1) O T = O −1 where M ∈ GL(N, C), i.e. det M ̸= 0.
!N ′i 2
= i=1 (x )
Basic properties: If [M1, M2] = 0 and M1,2 ∈ GL(N, C),
SO(N, R) as above + 1
2 N (N − 1) as above then the following relations hold:
detO = 1
(i) eM1 eM2 = eM1+M2 , (ii) ln(M1M2) = ln M1 +ln M2 .
!N
SU(N ) i=1 |xi|2 N −1 2 †
U =U −1
!N ′i 2
= i=1 |x |
detU = 1 Useful identity:
!N +M i j
SO(N, M ) i,j=1 x gij x ? ΛT gΛ = g ln(det M ) = Tr (ln M ) .
!N +M ′i ′j
= i,j=1 x gij x det Λ = 1
gij = diag (1, . . . , 1, −1, . . . , −1)
" #$ % " #$ % This identity can be proved more easily if M can be
N −times M −times diagonalized through a similarity trans: S −1M S = M *,
where M* is a diagonal matrix, and noticing that ln M =
*S −1. (Question: How?)
S ln M
15 16
– Generators and Exponential rep of Groups U(1): The 2-dim rep of SO(2) in (V, R) can be reduced in
[ Examples: SO(2), U(1), SO(3), SU(2) ] (V, C), by means of the trans:
SO(2): Transf. of a point P (x, y) under a rotation through 1 2 1 2
√1 √1 √1 √i
φ about z axis: M= 2 2 , M −1 = 2 2 ,
−i
√ √i √1 −i
√
+ , + ,+ , 2 2 2 2
x′ cos φ − sin φ x
= .
y′ sin φ cos φ y i.e.
- ./ 0
≡ O(φ) + ,
−1 eiφ 0
M O(φ) M = −iφ = D(1)(φ) ⊕ D(−1)(φ) .
T
Note that O (φ)O(φ) = 12 and hence x + y = x + y , 2 2 ′2 ′2 0 e
i.e. O(φ) is an orthogonal matrix, with detO=1.
′ ′ Both reps, D(1)(φ) = eiφ and D(−1)(φ) = e−iφ, are faithful
SO(2) is an Abelian group, since O(φ)O(φ ) = O(φ + φ ) =
irreps of U(1).
O(φ′)O(φ).
A general irrep of U(1) is
Taylor expansion of O(φ) about 12 = O(0):
+ , + , D(m)(φ) = eim φ ,
1 0 0 −i 2
O(δφ) = − i δφ + O[(δφ) ] ,
0 1 i 0
- ./ 0 - ./ 0 where m ∈ Z. (Question: What is the generator of U(1)?)
: 12 ∂O(φ)
: σ2 = i ∂φ |φ=0
17 18
Spatial rotation of a wave-function: SO(3): Group of proper rotations in 3-dim about a given
unit vector n = (nx, ny , nz ) = (n1, n2, n3), with n2 = 1.
Unitary operator of rotation of a wave-function:
Rotations about x, y, z-axes:
3R(δφ) ψ(r, θ) = (1 − iδφX̂) ψ(r, θ) = ψ(r, θ − δφ) ,
U
⎛
1 0 0
⎞ ⎛
cos φ 0 sin φ
⎞
R(φ, n) = exp(−iφ n · X) ,
19 20
Properties of the Generators of SO(3). SU(2): Rotation of a complex 2-dim vector v = (v1, v2)
(with v1,2 ∈ C) through angle θ about n:
Commutation relations:
v′ = U (θ, n) v ; v∗ · v = v′∗ · v′ ,
[Xi, Xj ] ≡ XiXj − Xj Xi = iεijk Xk .
with det U = 1 and
(Need to use that (Xk )ij = −iεijk and
εijmεklm = δik δjl − δilδjk .) U (θ, n) = exp(−iθn · 21 σ) = cos 21 θ − iσ · n sin 12 θ ,
Jacobi identity: where n2 = 1 and σ = (σ1, σ2, σ3) are the Pauli matrices.
[X1, [X2, X3]] + [X3, [X1, X2]] + [X2, [X3, X1]] = 0 . ∴ Xi = 12 σi are the generators of SU(2), with
+ , + , + ,
··· 0 1 0 −i 1 0
σ1 = , σ2 = , σ3 = .
1 0 i 0 0 −1
Irreps of SO(3). These are specified by an integer j (the so-
called total angular momentum in QM) and are determined Properties: (i) Tr σi = 0; (ii) σiσj = δij 12 + i εijk σk .
(j)
by the (2j + 1) × (2j + 1)-dim rep of the generators Xi :
Commutation relation: [Xi, Xj ] = i εijk Xk i.e. the same
(j)
algebra as of SO(3).
[X3 ]m′m = ⟨jm′|X̂3|jm⟩ = m δmm′ ,
Precise relation between SO(3) and SU(2):
(j)
5
[X± ]m′m = ⟨jm′|X̂±|jm⟩ = (j ∓ m)(j ± m + 1) δm′,m±1 , Since R(0) and R(2π) [with R(0) = R(2π) = 13] map into
different elements U (0) = 12 and U (2π) = −12, a faithful
(j) (j) (j)
with X± = X1 ± iX2 and X̂i = L̂i/". 1 : 1 mapping is
(1)
Exercise: Find the relation between Xi and Xi. SO(3) ∼
= SU(2)/Z2 ,
21 22
– The Adjoint Representation
4. Lie Algebra and Lie Groups
The Lie algebra commutator [Tc, ] (for fixed Tc) defines a
–Generators of a Group as Basis Vectors of a Lie Algebra linear homomorphic mapping from L to L over C:
A Lie algebra L is defined by a set of a number d(G) of
generators Ta closed under commutation: [Tc, λ1Ta + λ2Tb] = λ1[Tc, Ta] + λ2[Tc, Tb] ,
c
[Ta, Tb] = Ta · Tb − Tb · Ta = ifab Tc , ∀ Ta, Tb ⊂ L.
For every given Ta ∈ L, [Ta, ] may be represented in the
c
where fab are the so-called structure constants of L. vector space L by the structure constants themselves:
In addition, the generators Ta’s satisfy the Jacobi identity:
[DA(Ta)]cb = ifab
c c
(= −ifba ).
[Ta, [Tb, Tc]] + [Tc, [Ta, Tb]] + [Tb, [Tc, Ta]] = 0 .
Such a rep of Ta is called the adjoint representation, denoted
by A.
The set Ta of generators define a basis of a d(G)-dimensional
vector space (V, C). The Killing product form is defined as
In the fundamental rep, Ta are represented by d(F ) × d(F )
gab ≡ (Ta, Tb)A ≡ Tr[DA(Ta)DA(Tb)] (≡ TrA(TaTb) ) .
matrices, where d(F ) is the least number of dimensions
needed to generate the continuous group. d c
gab = −fac fbd is called the Cartan metric.
Ex: (i) SO(3): Ta = Xa; (ii) SU(2): Ta = 12 σa; (iii) U(1): ? c
The Cartan metric gab can be used to lower the index of fab :
Exponentiation of Ta generates the group elements of the
d
corresponding continuous Lie group: fabc = fab gdc .
G(θ, n) = exp[−iθn · T] , Exercise: Show that fabc = −i TrA([Ta, Tb] Tc) , and that
fabc is totally antisymmetric under the permutation of a, b, c:
with n2 = 1. fabc = −fbac = fbca etc.
23 24
General Remarks – Normalization of Generators and Casimir operators
c
• If all fab ’s are real for a Lie algebra L, then L is said to The generators of a Lie group DR(Ta) of a given rep R are
be a real Lie algebra. normalized as
• If the Cartan metric gab is positive definite for a real L, Tr [DR(Ta) DR(Tb)] = TR δab .
then L is an algebra for a compact group. In this case, gab
can be diagonalized and rescaled to unity, i.e. gab = 1ab. For example, in SU(N ) [or SO(N )], TF = 12 for the
[Ex: the real algebras of SU(N ) and SO(N )]. fundamental rep and TA = N for the adjoint reps.
• There is no adjoint representation for Abelian groups. Casimir operators T2R of a Lie algebra of a rep R are matrix
(Why ?) reps that commute with all generators of L in rep R.
• An ideal I is an invariant subalgebra of L, with A construction of a Casimir operator T2R in a given rep R of
[TaI , Tb] ⊂ I, ∀ TaI ∈ I and ∀ Tb ∈ L, SU(N ) [or SO(N )] may be obtained by
or symbolically [I, L] ⊂ I.
d(G) d(R)
( (
• Ideals I generate normal subgroups of the continuous (T2R)ij = TA [DR(Ta)]ik g ab [DR(Tb)]kj = δij CR ,
group generated by L. a,b=1 k=1
• Lie algebras that do not contain any proper ideals are where g ab is the inverse Cartan metric satisfying: g ab gbc = δca.
called simple (Ex: SO(2), SU(2), SU(3), SU(5), etc).
Exercises:
• Lie algebras that do not contain any proper Abelian ideals
Show that (i) [T2F , Ta] = 0;
are called semi-simple. (Question: What is the difference
between a simple and a semi-simple Lie algebra?) (ii) TR d(G) = CR d(R);
N 2 −1
(iii) CF = 2N and CA = N in SU(N ).
• A semi-simple Lie algebra can be written as a direct sum
of simple Lie algebras: L = I ⊕ P .
25 26
5. Tensors in SU(N ) SU(N ) trans. properties of the Kronecker delta δji and
Levi-Civita symbol εi1i2...in :
– Preliminaries
Invariance of δji under an SU(N ) trans:
Trans. of a complex vector ψi = (ψ1, ψ2, . . . , ψn) in SU(N ):
δj′i = U ik Uj l δlk = U ik Uj k = δji .
ψi → ψi′ = Uij ψj (= Ui j ψj ) ,
i i ...i
The rank of ψj11j22...jpq is p + q, with p contravariant and q
covariant indices.
27 28
Reduction of higher-rank tensors: – Young Tableaux
Lower-rank tensors can be formed by appropriate use of δji Higher-rank SU(N ) tensors do not generally define bases
and εi1i2...in : of irreps. To decompose them into irreps, we exploit the
following property which is at the heart of Young Tableaux.
i ...i i i ...i
ψj22...jpq = δij11 ψj11j22...jpq , An illustrative example. Consider the 2nd rank tensor ψij ,
ψ i1 = εi1i2...in ψi2...in , with the trans. property:
ψ = εi1i2...in ψi1i2...in , ′
ψij = Ui k Uj l ψkl .
ψ i1 j 1 = εi1i2...in εj1j2...jn ψi2...inj2...jn .
Permutation of i ↔ j (denoted by P12) does not change the
Since the Levi-Civita tensor can be used to lower or raise trans. law of ψij :
indices, we only need to study tensors with upper or lower
′ ′
indices. P12 ψij = ψji = Uj k Ui l ψkl = Uj lUi k ψlk
1 1
Sij = (1 + P12) ψij = ( ψij + ψji ) ,
2 2
1 1
Aij = (1 − P12) ψij = (ψij − ψji) ,
2 2
′
Sij = Ui k Uj lSkl , A′ij = Ui k Uj lAkl .
29 30
Introduction to Young Tableaux Rules for constructing a legal Young Tableau
ψ(ij) ≡ i j ψ[ij] ≡ i • Each row of a Young tableau must contain no more boxes
j than the row above. This implies e.g. that
31 32
How to find the dimension of a Young Tableau rep Rules for Clebsch-Gordan series
Steps to be followed: The direct product of reps can be decomposed as a Clebsch-
Gordan series (or direct sum) of irreps. This reduction can
(a) Write down the ratio of two copies of the tableau: be performed systematically by means of Young Tableaux,
following the rules below:
(a) Write down the two tableaux T1 and T2 and label successive
rows of T2 with indices a, b, c, . . .:
(b) Numerator: Start with the number N for SU(N ) in the top left box.
Each time you meet a box, increase the previous number by +1 when a a a
moving to the right in a row and decrease it by −1 when going down × b b
in a column: c
N N+1 N+2
N−1 N (b) Attach boxes a, b, c . . . from T2 to T1 in all possible
N−2 N−1
N−3
ways one at a time. The resulting diagram should be
a legal Young tableau with no two a’s or b’s being
in the same column (because of cancellation due to
(c) Denominator: In each box, write the number of boxes being to its antisymmetrization).
right + the number being below of it and add +1 for itself:
6 4 1
4 2
(c) At any given box position, there should be no more b’s
3 1 than a’s to the right and above of it. Likewise, there
1 should be no more c’s than b’s etc. For example, the
tableau a b is not legal.
(d) The dimension d of the rep is the ratio of the products of the entries
in the numerator versus that in the denominator: (d) Two generated tableaux with the same shape are different
d = [N (N + 1)(N + 2)(N − 1)N (N − 2)(N − 1)(N − 3)] if the labels are distributed differently.
/ [6 × 4 × 4 × 2 × 3] .
33 34
An example in SU(3) – Applications to Particle Physics
= a a + a a + a + a + a +1 Clebsch–Gordan series: 3 ⊗ 3̄ = 8 ⊕ 1:
b a b a b
1 j 1
qiq j = (qiq j − δi qk q k ) + δij qk q k .
3 3
8 × 8 = 27 ⊕ 10 ⊕ 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1 In terms of Young–Tableaux:
× = +
Exercise: Find the Clebsch–Gordan decomposition of the
product 8 × 10 in SU(3), represented by Young tableaux as
The singlet state is η1 = √1 qi q i
3
= √1
3
(uū + dd¯ + ss̄).
× The remaining 8 components represent the pseudoscalar octet
Pij = (qiq j − 31 δij qk q k ):
⎛ ⎞
(Ans: 8 × 10 = 8 ⊕ 10 ⊕ 27 ⊕ 35) √1 π 0 + √16 η8 π+ K+
2
⎜ π− − √12 π 0 + √16 η8 K0 ⎟
Pji = ⎝ ⎠.
2
K− K̄ 0 − √6 η 8
35 36
Baryons as three-quark states: Particle assignment in an SU(5) unified theory
⎛ ⎞
√1
2
Σ0 + √16 Λ8 Σ+ p
⎜
B = q[(ij);k] = ⎝ Σ− − √12 Σ0 + √1 Λ n ⎟
⎠.
6 In SU(5), the SM fermions are assigned as follows:
Ξ− Ξ0 − √26 Λ
⎛ ⎞
d¯r
⎜
⎜ d¯g ⎟
⎟
Exercise: Find the Clebsch–Gordan decomposition
5̄ = ⎜
⎜ d¯b ⎟ ,
⎟
for 3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3, using Young–Tableaux. ⎝ ⎠
e
What is the quark wave-function of p and n?
−ν L
and ⎛ ⎞
0 ūb −ūg ur d r
⎜ −ūb 0 ūr ug d g ⎟
⎜ ⎟
10 = ⎜
⎜ ūg −ūr 0 ub d b ⎟
⎟
⎝ −ur −ug −ub 0 ē ⎠
−dr −dg −db −ē 0 L
37 38
– Lie Algebra and Generators of the Lorentz Group
6. Lorentz and Poincaré Groups
Generators and Lie Algebra of SO(1,3)
Lorentz trans:
x2 = y x′2 = y ′ Generators of rotations J1,2,3:
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
0 x′0 = ct′ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
x = ct β = v/c ⎜ 0 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 i ⎟
J1 = ⎜
⎝ 0
⎟, J2 = ⎜ ⎟,
0 0 −i ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 0 0 ⎠
′
O O 0 0 i 0 0 −i 0 0
x1 = x x′1 = x′ ⎛
0 0 0 0
⎞
3 ′3 ′ ⎜ 0 0 −i 0 ⎟
x =z x =z J3 = ⎜
⎝ 0 i 0
⎟.
0 ⎠
0 0 0 0
Given the metric gµν = diag (1, −1, −1, −1), the covariant Commutation relations of the Lie algebra SO(1,3):
4-vector is defined as xµ = gµν xν = (ct, −x, −y, −z).
[Ji, Jj ] = i εijk Jk ,
Under a Lorentz trans, we have xµxµ = x′µ x′µ or
[Ji, Kj ] = i εijk Kk ,
xµ gµν xν = xβ Λµβ gµν Λναxα ⇒ ΛT gΛ = g , [Ki, Kj ] = −i εijk Jk
39 40
SO(1,3)C ∼
= SU(2) × SU(2) [or SO(1,3)R ∼ SL(2,C)] Classification of basis-states reps in SO(1,3)
[Xi+, Xj+] = i εijk Xk+ , (0,0): This is a total spin zero rep, with dim one. (0, 0) represents
[Xi−, Xj−] = i εijk Xk− , a scalar field φ(x) satisfying the Klein-Gordon equation:
(✷ + m2)φ(x) = 0, where ✷ = ∂ µ∂µ.
[Xi+, Xj−] = 0 .
( 12 , 0): This a 2-dim rep, the so-called left-handed Weyl rep,
Hence, SO(1,3) algebra splits into two SU(2) ones: e.g. neutrinos. It is denoted with a 2-dim complex vector
ξα, usually called the left-handed Weyl spinor. Under a
SO(1, 3)C ∼ Lorentz trans, ξα transforms as
= SU(2) × SU(2) ,
ξα′ = Mαβ ξβ ,
where SO(1,3)C is the rep from a complexified SO(1,3)
algebra. However, there is an 1:1 correspondence of the where Mαβ ∈ SL(2, C).
reps between SO(1,3)C and SO(1,3)R. In fact, we have the
homomorphism (0, 21 ): This is the corresponding 2-dim rep of the right-handed
Weyl spinor and is denoted as η̄α̇, which transforms under
SO(1, 3)R ∼ SL(2, C) , Lorentz trans as
η̄α̇′ = M † β̇α̇ η̄β̇ ,
which is more difficult to use for classification of reps. where M † β̇α̇ ∈ SL(2, C).
41 42
– Lie Algebra and Generators of the Poincaré Group The Lie Algebra of the Poincaré Group:
The Poincaré trans consist of Lorentz trans plus space-time The commutation relations defining the Poincaré Lie algebra
translations: are
x′µ = Λµν xν + aµ ,
where aµ is a constant 4-vector. [Pµ , Pν ] = 0 ,
The generator of translations in a differential-operator rep is [Pµ, Lρσ ] = i (gµρPσ − gµσ Pρ) ,
[Lµν , Lρσ ] = −i (gµρLνσ − gµσ Lνρ + gνσ Lµρ − gνρLµσ ) .
∂ ∂
P µ = i∂ µ = i = i( , −∇),
∂xµ c∂t
In terms of J and K, the commutation relations read:
∂
with Pµ = i∂µ = i( c∂t , ∇), because
[P0 , Ji] = 0 ,
ν
e−ia Pν µ
x = xµ + aµ . (Why?) [Pi , Jj ] = i εijk Pk ,
[P0 , Ki] = i Pi ,
An analogous differential-operator rep of the 6-generators of
[Pi , Kj ] = i P0 δij .
Lorentz trans is given by the generalized angular momentum
operators:
Lµν = xµPν − xν Pµ , Exercise: Prove all commutation relations that appear on this
with the identification page.
1
Ji = εijk Ljk , Ki = L0i .
2
1
Exercise: Show that Ji = 2 εijk Ljk and Ki = L0i satisfy
the SO(1,3) algebra.
43 44
– Single Particle States Classification of massless particle states
The Poincaré group has two Casimir operators: P 2 = P µPµ Massless particle states, for which P 2|a⟩ = 0 (m = 0),
and W 2 = W µWµ, where are characterized only by their 4-momentum pµ and helicity
λ = P · J.
1
Wµ = − εµνρσ Lνρ P σ , Alternatively, in addition to the operator Pµ, one may use the
2
Pauli–Lubanski operator Wµ:
with ε0123 = 1, is the so-called Pauli–Lubanski vector.
Wµ|a; pµ, λ⟩ = λ pµ |a; pµ, λ⟩ .
Classification of massive particle states
A single massive particle state |a⟩ can be characterized by its If the theory involves parity, then a massless state has only
mass and its total spin s, where s is defined in the rest of two degrees of freedom (polarizations): ±λ.
mass system of the particle:
Examples of the above are the photon and the neutrinos of
P 2 |a⟩ = m2 |a⟩ , W 2 |a⟩ = −m2J2 |a⟩ = −m2s(s+1)|a⟩ . the Standard Model.
···
In addition, we use the 3-momentum P and the helicity Exercises:
H = J · P operators to classify massive particle states:
(i) Show that P 2 and W 2 are true Casimir operators,
Pµ |a; m, s; p, λ⟩ = pµ |a; m, s; p, λ⟩ , i.e. [ P 2, Pµ ] = [ P 2, Lρσ ] = 0 , and likewise for W 2;
H |a; m, s; p, λ⟩ = λ|p| |a; m, s; p, λ⟩ . (ii) In particle’s rest frame where pµ = (m, 0, 0, 0), show that
W0 = 0, Wi = 12 mεijk Ljk = mJi and W 2 = −m2J2;
Note that a massive particle state has (2s + 1) polarizations
or helicities, also called degrees of freedom, (iii) Show that [J · P, P] = 0, [Pµ, Wν ] = 0, and WµP µ = 0;
i.e. λ = −s, −s + 1, . . . , s − 1, s.
(iv) Calculate the commutation relation [Wµ, Wν ].
Examples: for an electron, it is λ = ± 21 ,
and for a massive
spin-1 boson (e.g. the Z-boson), we have λ = −1, 0, 1.
45 46
Hamilton’s principle
7. Lagrangians in Field Theory
Hamilton’s principle states that the actual motion of the
– Variational Principle and Equation of Motion system is determined by the stationary behaviour of S
Classical Lagrangian Dynamics under small variations δqi(t) of the ith particle’s generalized
coordinate qi(t), with δqi(t1) = δqi(t2) = 0, i.e.
The Lagrangian for an n-particle system is
) t2 + ,
∂L ∂L
δS = dt δqi + δ q̇i
L(qi, q̇i) = T − V , t1 ∂qi ∂ q̇i
) t2 + ,
∂L d ∂L
where q1,2,...,n are the the generalized coordinates describing = dt δqi − = 0.
t1 ∂qi dt ∂ q̇i
the n particles, and q̇1,2,...,n are the respective time
derivatives.
The Euler–Lagrange equation of motion for the ith particle is
T and V denote the total kinetic and potential energies.
d ∂L ∂L
The action S of the n-particle system is given by ∴ − = 0.
dt ∂ q̇i ∂qi
) t2 ···
S[qi(t)] = dt L(qi, q̇i) .
t1 Exercise: Show that the Euler–Lagrange equations of motion
for a particle system described by a Lagrangian of the form
Note that S is a functional of qi(t). L(qi, q̇i, q̈i) are
d2 ∂L d ∂L ∂L
− + = 0.
dt2 ∂ q̈i dt ∂ q̇i ∂qi
47 48
Lagrangian Field Theory – Lagrangians for the Klein-Gordon and Maxwell eqs
In Quantum Field Theory (QFT), a (scalar) particle is Lagrangian for the Klein–Gordon equation
described by a field φ(x), whose Lagrangian has the functional
form: ) 1 1
LKG = (∂µφ) (∂ µφ) − m2 φ2 ,
L = d3x L(φ(x) , ∂µφ(x)) , 2 2
where L is the so-called Lagrangian density, often termed where φ(x) is a real scalar field describing one dynamical
Lagrangian in QFT. degree of freedom.
In QFT, the action S is given by The Euler–Lagrange equation of motion is the Klein–Gordon
) equation
+∞
(∂µ∂ µ + m2) φ(x) = 0 .
S[φ(x)] = d4x L(φ(x) , ∂µφ(x)) ,
−∞ ···
49 50
– Lagrangian for the Dirac equation Lorentz trans properties of the Weyl and Dirac spinors
LD = ψ̄ (i γ µ∂µ − m) ψ , The Dirac spinor ψ is the direct sum of two Weyl spinors ξ
and η̄ with Lorentz trans properties:
where
+ , + , ξα′ = Mαβ ξβ , η̄α̇′ = M † β̇α̇ η̄β̇ ,
ξβ (x) 0 (σ µ)αβ̇
ψ(x) = , γµ = µ α̇β ξ ′α = M −1 α β
ξ , η̄ ′α̇ = M †−1 α̇β̇ η̄ β̇ .
η̄ β̇ (x) (σ̄ ) 0 β
and ψ̄(x) ≡ (η α(x), ξ¯α̇(x) ), with σ µ = (12, σ) and σ̄ µ = with M ∈ SL(2, C).
(12, −σ).
Duality relations among 2-spinors:
α̇
The ξα and η̄ are 2-dim complex vectors (also called Weyl
spinors) whose components anti-commute: ξ1ξ2 = −ξ2ξ1, (ξ α)† = ξ¯α̇ , (ξα)† = ξ¯α̇ , (η̄α̇)† = ηα , (η α)† = η̄ α̇
η̄ 1̇η̄ 2̇ = −η̄ 2̇η̄ 1̇, ξ1η̄ 2̇ = −η̄ 2̇ξ1 etc.
Lowering and raising spinor indices:
The Euler–Lagrange equation of LD with respect to ψ̄ is the
Dirac equation:
ξα = εαβ ξ β , ξ α = εαβ ξβ , η̄α̇ = εα̇β̇ η̄ β̇ , η̄ α̇ = εα̇β̇ η̄β̇ ,
∂LD
= 0 ⇒ (i γ µ∂µ − m) ψ = 0 . 0
0 1
1
∂ ψ̄ with εαβ ≡ iσ2 = −1 0
= −εαβ and εα̇β̇ ≡ iσ2 = −εα̇β̇ .
The 4-component Dirac spinor ψ(x) that satisfies the Dirac Lorentz-invariant spinor contractions:
equation describes 4 dynamical degrees of freedom.
ξη ≡ ξ αηα = ξ αεαβ η β = −η β εαβ ξ α = η β εβαξ α = η β ξβ = ηξ
Exercises:
(i) Derive the Euler–Lagrange equation with respect to the Likewise, ξ¯η̄ ≡ (ηξ)† = ξα† η α† = ξ¯α̇η̄ α̇ = η̄α̇ξ¯α̇ = η̄ ξ.
¯
Dirac field ψ(x);
(ii) Show that up to a total derivative term, LD is Hermitian, Exercise: Given that M σµM † = Λνµ σν and M †−1σ̄µM −1 =
i.e. LD = L†D + ∂ µjµ, with jµ = ψ̄ iγµ ψ. Λνµ σ̄ν , show that LD is invariant under Lorentz trans.
51 52
Global and Local Symmetries in QFT
8. Gauge Groups
Consider the Lagrangian (density) for a complex scalar:
– Global and Local Symmetries
L = (∂ µφ)∗ (∂µφ) − m2 φ∗φ + λ(φ∗φ)2 .
Symmetries in Classical Physics and Quantum Mechanics:
Translational invariance in time Energy conservation L is invariant under a U(1) rotation of the field φ:
dE
t → t + a0 ⇒ dt = 0
φ(x) → φ′(x) = eiθ φ(x) ,
Translational invariance in space Momentum conservation
dp
r→r+a ⇒ dt = 0 where θ does not depend on x ≡ xµ.
Rotational invariance Angular momentum conservation
dJ A transformation in which the fields are rotated about x-
r → Rr ⇒ dt = 0 independent angles is called a global transformation. If the
angles of rotation depend on x, the transformation is called
Quantum Mechanics Degeneracy of energy states a local or a gauge transformation.
dO
[H, O] = 0 ⇒ dt = i[H, O] = 0
A general infinitesimal global or local trans of fields φi under
the action of a Lie group reads:
Quantum Field Theory Noether’s Theorem
φ(x) → φ(x) + δφ(x) ⇒ ? φi(x) → φ′i(x) = φi(x) + δφi(x) ,
53 54
– Gauge Invariance of the QED Lagrangian QED Lagrangian with an electron-photon interaction
Consider first the Lagrangian for a Dirac field ψ: The complete Lagrangian of Quantum Electrodynamics
(QED) that includes the interaction of the photon with the
LD = ψ̄ (iγ µ∂µ − m) ψ . electron is
1
LD is invariant under the U(1) global trans: LQED = − Fµν F µν + ψ̄ (i ̸ ∂ − m − e A
̸ )ψ,
4
We demand that Aµ transforms under a local U(1) as be extended so as to become gauge symmetric under a U(1)
local trans?
1
Aµ → A′µ = Aµ − ∂µθ(x) .
e
55 56
– Noether’s Theorem With the aid of the equations of motions for φi, the last
equation implies that
Noether’s Theorem. If a Lagrangian L is symmetric under a
global transformation of the fields, then there is<a conserved = > = >
∂L ∂L ∂L
current J µ(x) and a conserved charge Q = d3x J 0(x), ∂µ δφi = ∂µ − δφi = 0 .
∂(∂µφi) ∂(∂µφi) ∂φi
associated with this symmetry, such that
Consider a Lagrangian L(φi, ∂µφi) to be invariant under the The corresponding conserved charges are
infinitesimal global trans:
)
δφi = i θa(T a)ij φj , Qa(t) = d3x J a, 0(x) .
where T a are the generators of some group G. Indeed, it is easy to check that
57 58
– Yang–Mills Theory Interaction between quarks qi and gluons Aaµ in SU(3)c
The Lagrangian of a Yang–Mills (non-Abelian) SU(N ) theory If qi = (qred, qgreen, qblue) are the 3 colours of the quark,
is their interaction with the 8 gluons Aaµ is described by the
1 a a,µν
LYM = − Fµν F , Lagrangian:
4
where
Lint = q̄ i [ i ̸ ∂ δij − m δij − g A
̸ a(T a)ij ] qj .
a
Fµν = ∂µAaν − ∂ν Aaµ − g f abc Abµ Acν ,
and f abc are the structure constants of the SU(N ) Lie algebra. Exercise: Show that Lint is invariant under the SU(3) gauge
transformation:
It can be shown that LYM is invariant under the infinitesimal
SU(N ) local trans: 1
δAaµ = − ∂µθa − f abc θb Acµ , δqi = iθa (T a)ij qj ,
g
1
δAaµ = − ∂µθa − f abc θb Acµ .
g where T a = 21 λa are the generators of SU(3) and λa are the
Gell-Mann matrices:
Examples of SU(N ) theories are the SU(2)L group of the SM ⎛ ⎞
0 1,2,3 1 0 0 1
and Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) based on the SU(3)c λ
1,2,3
=
σ 0
, λ
4
= ⎝ 0 0 0⎠,
group. 0 0
1 0 0
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
The gauge (vector) fields of the SU(2)L are the W 0 and W ± 0 0 −i 0 0 0
5 6
bosons responsible for the weak force. λ = ⎝ 0 0 0 ⎠, λ = ⎝ 0 0 1⎠,
i 0 0 0 1 0
The gauge vector bosons of the SU(3)c group are the gluons ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ 1
√ 0 0
⎞
0 0 0 3
mediating the strong force between quarks. 7 8 ⎜ √1 0 ⎟
λ = ⎝ 0 0 −i ⎠ , λ = ⎝ 0 3 ⎠.
0 i 0 2
Gauge bosons of Yang–Mills theories self-interact! 0 0 − 3
√
59 60
Then, we have
9. The Geometry of Gauge Transformations
d 1
– Parallel Transport and Covariant Derivative v(t) = { vi(t + δt) − (vi(t) − δt vj (t) [ei · ∂tej ])}
dt δt
Simple Example: × ei(t + δt)
e2 = [ ∂tvi(t) + (ei · ∂tej ) vj (t) ] ei(t) .
v(t)
We can now define the covariant derivative to act only on
θ(t) the components of v(t) as:
e1
d
Time-dependent vector written in terms of t-dependent unit with the obvious property dt v(t) = ei(t)Dtvi(t). The second
vectors: term is induced by the change of the coordinate axes, namely
after performing a parallel transport of our coordinate system
v(t) = vi(t) ei(t) (with i = 1, 2). e1,2(t) from t to t + δt.
61 62
Differentiation in curved space Covariant derivative in the Gauge-Group Space
The notion of the covariant derivative generalizes to curved Consider the difference of a fermionic isovector field ψ at
space as well. By analogy, the infinitesimal difference between xµ + δxµ and xµ in an SU(N ) gauge theory:
the 4-vectors V µ(x′µ) and V (xµ) is given by
Dψ = dψ + δψ ,
µ µ µ
DV = dV + δV ,
where
where dV µ is the difference of the 2 vectors in the same δψ = ig T aAaµ dxµ ψ
coordinate system and δV µ is due to parallel transport of the and the field Aaµ takes care of the change of the SU(N ) axes
vector from xµ to x′µ = xµ + δxµ. from point to point in Minkowski space.
with
i
A′µ = U Aµ U † + (∂µU ) U † .
g
63 64
A round trip in the SU(N ) Gauge-Group Space Parallels between Gauge Theory and General Relativity
D C In General Relativity, a corresponding round trip of a vector
V µ in a curved space gives rise to
δxµ
1 µ
A ∆x µ B ∆V µ = Rρσλ V ρ∆S σλ ,
2
Keeping terms up to second order in δx and ∆x, we have
where ∆S σλ represents the area enclosed by the path and
1 µ
Rρσλ is the Riemann–Christoffel curvature tensor:
ψB = (1 + ∆xµDµ + ∆xµ∆xν DµDν ) ψA,0 ,
2
1 µ
Rρσλ = ∂λΓµρσ − ∂σ Γµρλ + Γκρσ Γµκλ − ΓκρλΓµκσ .
ψC = (1 + δxµDµ + δxµδxν DµDν ) ψB ,
2
1
ψD = (1 − ∆xµDµ + ∆xµ∆xν DµDν ) ψC ,
2 Analogies:
1
ψA,1 = (1 − δxµDµ + δxµδxν DµDν ) ψD . Gauge Theory General Relativity
2
Gauge trans. Co-ordinate trans.
Hence,
Gauge field Aaµ T a Affine connection, Γκλν
µ
Field strength F µν Curvature tensor Rρσλ
ψA,1 = (1 + δxµ∆xν [Dµ , Dν ]) ψA,0 ,
Bianchi
! identity: Bianchi
! identity:
κ
ρ,µ,ν Dρ Fµν = 0 ρ,µ,ν Dρ Rλµν = 0
and ψA,1 ̸= ψA,0. cyclic cyclic
i a
[Dµ , Dν ] = Fµν Ta
g
65 66
– Topology of the Vacuum: the Bohm–Aharanov Effect Basic Concepts in Topology
The Bohm–Aharanov Effect: Let a(s) and b(s) be two paths in a topological space Y both
starting from the point P (a(0) = b(0) = P ) and ending at a
1
possibly different point Q (a(1) = b(1) = Q). If there exists
x: displacement of fringes
e− source d a continuous function L(t, s) such that L(0, s) = a(s) and
2 L(1, s) = b(s), then the paths a and b are called homotopic
B which is denoted by a ∼ b.
Vector potential A and B field (with B = ∇ × A) in If P ≡ Q, the path is said to be closed.
cylindrical polars:
The inverse of a path a is written as a−1 and is defined by
Br a−1(s) = a(1 − s). It corresponds to the same path traversed
Inside: Ar = Az = 0, Aφ = ,
2 in the opposite direction.
Br = Bφ = 0 , Bz = B ,
The product path c = ab is defined by
2
BR
Outside: Ar = Az = 0, Aφ = , c(s) = a(2s) , for 0 ≤ s ≤ 21 ,
2r
B = 0, c(s) = b(2s − 1) , for 12 ≤ s ≤ 1 .
where R is the radius of the solenoid. If a ∼ b, then ab−1 is homotopic to the null path: ab−1 ∼ 1.
67 68
Homotopy Classes, Groups and the Winding Number The Bohm–Aharanov Effect Revisited
All paths related to maps X → Y of two topological spaces In regions with E = B = 0, Aµ is a pure gauge: Aµ = ∂µχ
X, Y can be divided into homotopy classes. (Why?).
Homotopy Class. All paths that are homotopic to a given The configuration space X of the Bohm–Aharanov effect is
path a(s) define a set, called the homotopy class and denoted the plane R2 with a hole in it, due to the solenoid. This is
by [a]. For example, [fn] are distinct homotopy classes for topologically equivalent (≡ homeomorphic) to R × S 1. The
different n. space X can be conveniently described by polar coords (r, φ),
with r ̸= 0.
Winding Number. Each homotopy class may be
characterized by an integer, the winding number n (also called It can be shown that χ(r, φ) = const. × φ, which is a function
the Pontryargin index). For the case f (θ) : S 1 → U (1), the in the group space of U(1), i.e. Y = U (1).
winding number is determined by
Since functions mapping S 1 onto R are all deformable to a
)2π + , constant, the non-trivial part of χ is given by the map:
1 d ln f (θ)
n = dθ . S 1 → U (1) .
2πi dθ
0
Because π1[U (1)] = Z, the electron paths cannot be deformed
Homotopy Group. The set of all homotopy classes related to a null path with a constant χ, implying Aµ = 0 everywhere
to maps X → Y forms a group, under the multiplication law and the absence of the Bohm–Aharanov effect.
69 70
ZN -graded Lie algebra. The generalization of a Z2-graded
10. Supersymmetry (SUSY)
Lie algebra L to ZN can be defined analogously. Let L be
the direct sum of N subalgebras Li:
– Graded Lie Algebra
∀ T (0) ∈ L0, T (1) ∈ L1, the generators satisfy the following The ZN -graded Jacobi identity is defined analogously with
properties: that of Z2, where gi,j = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1 is the degree of
(0) (0) 2 (0) (0) (0) (0) graduation of Li,j .
(i) T1 ◦ T2 = −(−1)g0 T2 ◦ T1 = [T1 , T2 ] ∈ L0 ,
(ii) T (0) ◦T (1) = −(−1)g0g1 T (1) ◦T (0) = {T (0), T (1)} ∈ L1 , ···
(1) (1) 2 (1) (1) (1) (1)
(iii) T1 ◦T2 = −(−1)g1 T2 ◦T1 = [T1 , T2 ] ∈ L0 ,
Exercise:⋆⋆⋆ Find the (anti)-commutation relations and the
where g0 = g(L0) = 0 and g1 = g(L1) = 1 are the degrees structure constants of the Z2-graded Lie algebra of SU(2).
of the graduation of the Z2-graded Lie algebra.
where i, j, k = 0, 1.
71 72
– Generators of the Super-Poincaré Group Consequences of the Super-Poincaré Symmetry
The generators super-Poincaré algebra are Pµ , Lµν ∈ L0
and the spinors Qα , Q̄α̇ ∈ L1. They satisfy the following • Equal number of fermions and bosons.
relations:
• Scalar supermultiplet Φ 3 ⊃ (φ , ξ , F ), where φ is a
(i) [Pµ , Pν ] = 0 ,
complex scalar (2), ξ is a 2-component complex spinor (4),
(ii) [Pµ, Lρσ ] = i (gµρPσ − gµσ Pρ) , and F is an auxiliary complex scalar (2).
(iii) [Lµν , Lρσ ] = −i (gµρLνσ − gµσ Lνρ + gνσ Lµρ − gνρLµσ ) .
(iv) {Qα, Qβ } = {Q̄α̇, Q̄β̇ } = 0 , • Vector supermultiplet V3 a ⊃ (Aaµ , λa, Da), where Aaµ
µ
are massless non-Abelian gauge fields (3), λa are the 2-
(v) {Qα, Q̄β̇ } = 2(σ )αβ̇ Pµ ,
component gauginos (4), and Da are the auxiliary real
(vi) [Qα, Pµ] = 0 , fields (1).
β
(vii) [Lµν , Qα] = −i(σµν )α Qβ ,
β̇
(viii) [Lµν , Q̄α̇] = −i(σ̄µν )α̇ Q̄β̇ , The simplest model that realizes SUperSYmmetry (SUSY)
is the Wess–Zumino model. Counting on-shell degrees of
where (σ µν )αβ = 41 [ (σ µ)αα̇(σ̄ ν )α̇β − (σ ν )αα̇(σ̄ µ)α̇β ] and freedom (dof), the Wess-Zumino model contains one complex
(σ̄ µν )α̇β̇ = 41 [ (σ̄ µ)α̇β (σ ν )β β̇ − (σ̄ ν )α̇β (σ µ)β β̇ ]. scalar φ (2 dofs) and one Weyl spinor ξ (2 dofs):
···
bosonic dofs = fermionic dofs
Exercise:⋆ Prove the Z2-graded Jacobi identity:
73 74
– The Wess–Zumino Model Exercise: Show that
⇒ Lscalar → Lscalar + δLscalar , But, we are not finished yet ! The difference of two successive
δLscalar = ¯ µφ)
θ(∂ µφ†)(∂µξ) + θ̄(∂ µξ)(∂ SUSY transfs. must be a symmetry of the Lagrangian as well,
i.e. SUSY algebra should close.
Try ξα → ξα + δξα and ξ¯α̇ → ξ¯α̇ + δ ξ¯α̇, with
(δθ2 δθ1 − δθ1 δθ2 )φ = −i(θ1σ µθ̄2 − θ2σ µθ̄1) ∂µφ
δξα = −i(σ µθ̄)α∂µφ and δ ξ¯α̇ = i(θσ µ)α̇∂µφ† ≡ iϵµPµφ (with ϵµ∗ = ϵµ)
75 76
To close SUSY algebra off-shell, we need an auxiliary complex The interacting WZ model
scalar F (without kinetic term) and add
LWZ = Lkin + Lint
†
LF = F F = (∂ µφ†)(∂µφ) + ξ¯ iσ̄ µ(∂µξ) + F †F
1 1 † ¯¯
to Lscalar + Lfermion, with − Wφφ ξξ + Wφ F − Wφφ ξ ξ + Wφ†F †
2 2
δF = −iθ̄σ̄ µ(∂µξ) , ¯ µθ
δF † = i(∂µξ)σ̄ where
m h
δξα = −i(σ µθ̄)α∂µφ + θαF , δ ξ¯α̇ = i(θσ µ)α̇∂µφ† + θ̄α̇F † W (φ) = φφ + φφφ
2 6
is the so-called superpotential, and
Exercise: Prove (i) that the Lagrangian
δW h
Wφ = = mφ + φ2
δφ 2
Lkin = (∂ µφ†)(∂µφ) + ξ¯ iσ̄ µ(∂µξ) + F †F
δ 2W
Wφφ = = m + hφ
is invariant under the off-shell SUSY transfs: δφ δφ
δφ = θξ , δφ† = θ̄ξ¯
Exercise: Show that up to total derivatives,
δξα = −i(σ µθ̄)α∂µφ + θαF , δ ξ¯α̇ = i(θσ µ)α̇∂µφ† + θ̄α̇F †
δF = −iθ̄σ̄ µ(∂µξ) , ¯ µθ
δF † = i(∂µξ)σ̄ 1 1 † ¯¯
Lint = − Wφφ ξξ + Wφ F − Wφφ ξ ξ + Wφ†F †
2 2
and (ii) that the SUSY algebra closes off-shell: 1 1
= − (m + hφ)ξξ − (m + hφ†)ξ¯ξ¯
2 2
(δθ2 δθ1 − δθ1 δθ2 )X = −i(θ1σ µθ̄2 − θ2σ µθ̄1) ∂µX , h h
+ (mφ + φ2)F + (mφ† + φ†2)F †
2 2
¯ F, F †.
with X = φ, φ†, ξ, ξ, remains invariant under off-shell SUSY transformations.
77 78
– Feynman rules Summary
mh † 2 h2 † 2
V = Wφ†Wφ = m2φ†φ + (φ φ + φ†2φ) + (φ φ)
2 4
+ ,
ξ
Exercise: If Ψ = is a Majorana 4-spinor, show that
ξ¯
the Ψ-dependent part of the WZ Lagrangian can be written
down as
1 1
LΨ = Ψ iγ µ∂µΨ − m Ψ Ψ
2 2
h h
− φ Ψ PL Ψ − φ † Ψ P R Ψ ,
2 2
79 80
Feynman rules:
φ, p i
:
p2 − m2
Ψ, p i
: ̸p − m
: −imh
: −ih2
: −ihPL
: −ihPR
81