Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Problem 1
Score
Sl. No. Factor for consideration (out of 100)
1 Nearness to port 80
2 Existence of supplier infrastructure 70
3 Availability of skilled labour 90
4 Government policies and local taxes 50
5 Projected cost of operations 60
6 Quality of road infrastructure 70
7 Availability of educational infrasturcture 40
Score (out of
Sl. No. Factor for consideration 100) Relative Weight
1 Nearness to port 80 0.17
2 Existence of supplier infrastructure 70 0.15
3 Availability of skilled labour 90 0.2
4 Government policies and local taxes 50 0.11
5 Projected cost of operations 60 0.13
6 Quality of road infrastructure 70 0.15
7 Availability of educational infrasturcture 40 0.09
8 Sum of all Factor Ratings 460 1
Conversion of Actual Data to score out of 100
Final Rankings:
Sl. No. Factor for consideration Relative Weight Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
1 Nearness to port 0.17 24 44 32
2 Existence of supplier infrastructure 0.15 60 80 85
3 Availability of skilled labour 0.2 50 70 85
4 Government policies and local taxes 0.11 70 45 60
5 Projected cost of operations 0.13 36 33 31
6 Quality of road infrastructure 0.15 80 90 70
7 Availability of educational infrasturcture 0.09 60 80 80
Weighted scores:
Therefore location 3 is ranked first closely followed by site 2. Since the margin separating them is
small, these two sites can be subject to further detailed investigations.
ION
ting them is
PREVIOUS SOLUTION NEXT SOLUTION
What-if ??
Problem 2
Change the weight (W) and see
Given the impact on the solution
Transport Cost (Rs/Tonne) 300
(a) x y W Wx Wy
Zone 1 15 22 200 3,000 4,400
Zone 2 10 40 130 1,300 5,200
Zone 3 35 15 80 2,800 1,200
Zone 4 50 5 120 6,000 600
Zone 5 40 35 170 6,800 5,950
700 19,900 17,350
Centroid 28 25
Problem 3 What if
Dij Values
Centroid 1 2 3
Zone 1 13.34 18.68 25.18 30.48
Zone 2 23.43 10.00 33.54 25.50
Zone 3 12.21 29.15 11.18 30.00
Zone 4 29.73 46.10 22.36 42.72
Zone 5 15.62 20.62 10.00 11.18
LDj Values
Centroid 1 2 3
12,914.20 16,405.06 14,673.91 18,837.32
Cost Values
LD Cost 3,874,259 4,921,517 4,402,174 5,651,197
Opn cost 2,500,000 2,250,000 1,875,000 2,050,000
Total cost 6,374,259 7,171,517 6,277,174 7,701,197
cost to see
!!
PREVIOUS SOLUTION NEXT SOLUTION
Problem 4
The Least cost schedule (obtained using solver, for details see below) is as follows:
Transportation Schedule
Hydera Myso Madr Koch Supp Availa
Pune Vizag
bad re as i ly ble
Warehouse A 0 0 1900 0 0 0 1900 1900
Warehouse B 0 750 0 500 550 0 1800 1800
Warehouse C 1750 0 100 0 650 800 3300 3300
Warehouse D 0 0 0 1300 0 0 1300 1300
Demand 1750 750 2000 1800 1200 800 8300 8300
Actual 1750 750 2000 1800 1200 800
Problem 5
The Least cost schedule (obtained using solver, for details see below) is as follows:
Transportation Schedule
Hyde
Myso Madr Viza Supp Avail
raba Pune
re as g ly able
d
Warehouse A 0 0 1900 0 0 1900 1900
Warehouse B 0 1800 0 0 0 1800 1800
Warehouse C 1750 0 0 750 800 3300 3300
Warehouse D 0 750 100 450 0 1300 1300
Demand 1750 2550 2000 1200 800 8300 8300
Actual 1750 2550 2000 1200 800
Problem 6
Unbalanc
Total
demand
8300 ed 900
demand
The Least cost schedule (obtained using solver, for details see below) is as follows:
Warehouse C supplies 900 units to a dummy source, thereby implying that 900 units
are excess. The setting up of the new warehouse has resulted in a savings in
transportaion cost of Rs. 8000/- per unit time. Based on the trade off between
cost of setting the new warehouse and savings, the management can evaluate whether
the new proposal is worthwhile.
Transportation Schedule
Hyde
Myso Madr Koch Viza Dum Supp Avail
raba Pune
re as i g my ly able
d
Warehouse A 0 0 1400 500 0 0 0 1900 1900
Warehouse B 0 750 0 0 1050 0 0 1800 1800
Warehouse C 1450 0 0 0 150 800 900 3300 3300
Warehouse D 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 1300 1300
Warehouse E 300 0 600 0 0 0 0 900 900
Demand 1750 750 2000 1800 1200 800 900 9200 9200
Actual 1750 750 2000 1800 1200 800 900