Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
:
, ,
,
:
, , ,
, -
, - , , ,
2013
617.6'43-dc22
ISBN-13: 9781850971993
. . .
(2, 6-22, 24-33), (23),
(3-5), (1)
, , ,
, -
,
© « », 2013
, 119048, , . , . 62, . 1, 1
./ : 8(499)245-52-79
E-mail: info@dental-azbuka.ru. http:/ / www.dental-azbuka.ru
.
.
ISBN 978-5-9-91443-026-6
.
. ,
, , , ,
« -
», .
, 45
, - ,
. , , .
, ,
,
, .
, « -
- .
( ) »
. ,
, .
2.
- ..................................................................... 25
3. - ................. 41
II.
4. ................................................................. 61
5. - ........... 81
6. - ............................................... 111
7. - ......................................... 135
8.
- ..................................................................... 153
17.
- ...................................................... 279
19.
- ................................................................... 299
21. -
......................................................................................... 321
24 .
- ................................................................... 365
27.
- ....................................................................... 411
28.
- ...................................................... 425
29.
- ................................................................... 439
33. - :
, .............................................................................. 497
, )<
-
-
( ) II ( )
,
- ( )
.
( , (Greg . Murray), BDS, MDS,
) PhD, FRACDS
(Frank Lobbezoo) DDS, ( )
PhD
(Machiel Naeije), PhD
,
,
VU
( ) ,
VU ( )
(Guido . Macaluso), MD,
DDS, MDS (Luca Guarda Nardini),
MD, DDS
( ) -
( )
(Edoardo Manfredi),
DDS (Peter Nicolakis), MD
( ) ( )
- ( )
( )
(Tuija Suvinen), DDS, PhD
(Arne Petersson), DDS,
Odontdr
- ( )
( ) ( )
( )
-
,
.56
.
1
- ( ),
-
.2
,
,
. .7 « »
- ,
, , .8
.3
( 1-1 ):9 ,
: « ; ,
;
, , , ,
».4 .
,
,
, ( ),
, .
.
. -
1-1. 1-2. -
( ) (
)
( ),
1 .
-
«
».
:
- :
( ) / ,
J
;
- (
) ;
,
- ;
, - (
, -
. );
- .
. : ,
.
.
-
( . 1-1)
,
.
,
(
.- , .), 20 8
.10-13 .
1-2.7'1'1-17
15-25°
.
.
, ,
,
.
,
. 1-1. . ( ). . ( ), .
:
-
, .20
. , ,
( )
.21
. ( . 1-2 1-3)
,
.
- ,
(
) . .
:
( .
).
- , .
- -
.
, , .
.
.
,
(
- ).18 .
,
:
.19 (lig. discotemporalis. - , .),
(lig. discomandibularis. - ,
, .).
. 1-2. . . .
- . . ,
(
.- , .) .
.
, ,
.
(Testut),23
, . -
2 .23
, .
. ,
1954 . (Leonard A. Rees) .24
,
.22 12 .
, :
,
, - .26
.26
.
(
). 1- (85 %
).27
( ) ,23
, 2-
- .29
, - .30
,
,31 -
. .
. .8 -
. 1-3. .
.
.
( )
,
,
,
, .
;
,
.32
.22
,22
.33
,
( . 1-2 1-3) .
,
. ,
. .
,
, .
,
(Glaser), .
. ,
:
, .
. , ,
,
,
: .
.
.3435
.
, ,
’ 1
- -
/
-
. 1-4. . - . .
( . 1-4) . -
, . .
,
• - (
. ).
-
.
• -
.
,
,
, ,
- .10 .
, ,
,
.
.
.
• ,
• - - ,
.
.
• - ), - -
,
. .1142
(lingula).
• ( . 1-4 1-5)
.
1897 1995 . , -
42 ,
, .10'17
.36 , ,
- ,
, , ,
.
.37
,
, , .
.38 ,
- , ,
.
,
.39
,
.40'41
,
-
. .843
8- .
,
.
- 8-
, .
, ,
-
, . 12-
.1042 ,
:
,
.
.
,
( ,
. 1-5.
- /
-
.50
. .
16-
.47 . . 1-6
,
,51 . 1-7
.
: - ,
, ,
, .48
.52
: ,
.
, . ,
( . 1-6 ).49 ,53
, ,
- -
. 1-6. . ( ), ( ) ( )
. .
. 1-7.
,54 .55 .
, 50± 6 , -
- 7,5± 1,5 , -
9,6± 1,8 .58
.56 ,59
50
, 16 ,
10 ,
.57 34°.
, ,
, ,
. 1-8. .
( ). .
( ), . . (
,
( )- )( . 1-10-1-12).
( . 1-8).26
( )
.
( . 1-9) - (
- ),
, ( -
, ) -
, . (
,— ) ( . 1-11, 1-13 1-14).
.
.60 .
, .
.
, -
: ;
(
), .
(
) ( . 1-5,1-12,1-15 1-16).
-
—
----
-
-
. 1-9. . . .
............
/
/
^
— -
. 1-10. . 1-11. -
,
\
\ /
. 1-12. . 1-13. ,
>
!
ijm \ -
^ \
/
- I ' -
. 1-14. . . 1-15. -
( )
. 1-1 1-2
.
. ,
,
(
). . 1-16.
.
.
,
, .66
.60
,
.
, :
, .61 .
-
, -
.62 .66 ,
.67
,
. ,
( ) .
.63
- , - ,
- , .
, , :
.22
, - .64
, ,
.68
.
,
,
:
. : . .
: , , - :
-
, -
.
,
- ( )
:
: : - . ,
,
. . - .
: . , . :
( :
) , - .
:
,
, .
. :
-
: :
. : - .
. - .
. . : .
: ,
: - .
,
:
: - : -
. .
, - : . .
: -
, , -
,
. ,
: ,
,
,
- - - - -
, :
-
. . ,
, ,
-
, -
.
, (XII -
- .
- )
(
. 1-9)
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
-
: ,
,
:
• .13
. 1-17.
12 (
.- , .)
•
.2265
,
,
.
( . 1-2
1-3).
•
,
( . 1-2 1-3), , , :
.69
•
,50
.
, .
, ( . 1-6 ).
•
. . ,
(
) . . 1-17
( ) .71
( . 1-6 ).51 ,
,
( ), ,
. .
•
, . ,
( . 1-8).26’70 , .
, . . , ,
. , - .
. 1-18. -
: 1- ;2- ;3-
;4- - ;5- - ;6-
- ;7- - ;8-
- ;9- - ; 10 - -
; 11 - - . - -
( - ); - - ( -
); - - ; D-
( - ). -
, , ,
.
. ,
, -
, , :
,
. 1-17. , - -
, . ,
.
, .
. Bermegio-Fenoll .
, - ( ),
,
,
- ( . 1-3, . 1-18-1-20).
.
. ,
- ( 1-3)
, - , ,7273 ,74
( ) .75
. 1-19. - . 1-20.
. .
. -
,
1-3.
,76
.
, , ,
, -
( 1-1). ( ).
, ,
.
, -
, . .
,
.77 , ,
.43 ( . 1-3).
,
, . .
.
.
,
.
. ,
(
).78-80
- -
( )
( - ) ( - )
( - ( -
) )
( )
-
, . . .
. (F. Sanchez
del Campo) . (A. Puchades).
- - - (Elena
Tari-Amoros),
. , -
(Juan Dengra-Martinez)
, - (M anuel Perez-Gomez)
, ,
(Joe Perkins) (
. Partington)
.
« -
» ( )
,
-
( ) ( )
,1
- 10 .
- 4
:
, - : ( )
, , ; ;
.2'3 ,
,5
. ,
, , ,
.
. -
.
. ,
,
, . ,
. .6
,
1-75 % ,
- 5-33 %.7 ,
( )
,
20 40 ,
. (10-15 %
, ),
.
,
- ,19
.
, .
Casanova-Rosado .,9
( . 2-1). 46,1 %
( 17 )
( .
,
) ,
( , ,
,
). . ,
6-30 % 15 %
, ,
5-33 % - , 4-16 % - Rantala .,14
,
.101618 -
. , .
, , 4-6 %
, (10,9 %).
. , (52,9
, 37,9 %, ).
, Schmitter
: .12
- 8-20 %, /
- 4-15 %, - 4-10 %,
- ( 83 ).
3- 17,5 %, - ,
4- 9 %. ,
, ,
(38 % 7 %)
, (21 % 0 %),
,
. ,
( / ) ,
. ,
Rantala .,14 (16 %
0 % 22,7 % 10,3 %, -
(%)
( )
- , - , - , / - -
KJ
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
-
).
, , .
.
,
, ,
20-40 . ,
.23 1934 .,
(Costen)
. ,24
, ,
, ,
,
, .
,
,
.20 , ,26
, , ,
,
. ,
. 27 % ,
,26 10 %
, .27 ,
,
, . , ,
,
.
1950- . Lupton Schwartz,
28
.
,
, ,
, .22-29
/ 30
.22
- ,3132
, .2’ ,
, (
, , ).33
. ,
, ( . Manfredini
Lobbezoo34).
, - .
( . 8).
,
.
.
, ,
.
-
.
,
-
.35 -
,
.36'37 .
, ,
,
.39 1 6 .
,
, ,
( . Suvinen et al.,22
. Okeson2).
.40
-
( , Academ y of Orofacial
, Pain)42
( / ).30
.
.41 ,
, . .
,
. , -
2-1. -
(De Leeu w 42) .
,
, , ,
. ,
,
•
.
•
• ,
• .
•
,
.
•
• .
-
•
• .
• ,
• .
.
,
.
-
(. .
) .
,
. ,
. ,
, ,
, ,
, . ,
.
,
, ,
,
. .
.
.
,
.
. ,
. ,
.
, ,
.
,
, .
.
, .
,
,
. .
,
. ,
,- .
,
,
.
. .
,
,
, - /
.
, ( I) ( II)
.
, I
,
. .
. : ( 1);
( 2); ,
. ,
( 3).
, , , ,
. ,
, . . .
.
. ( 1)
,
. ,
.
,
20 ( 10
- , ).
.
,
40 . ,
.
.
.
(
2)
, , .
, . :
;
, ;
.
.
.
.
. ,
(
),
2-2.
. -
(Dwo rkin LeResche30)
35 «
I
». 35
1
a.
.
b.
,
, 3,
2
( )
a.
.
b.
( II),
c.
,
3
.
a.
b.
.
c.
/
II
•
( ,
•
,
•
, ,
, ),
•
•
•
.
0:
I:
/ ,
II:
.
,
III:
,
. ,
IV:
,
.
,
, ,
. ,
,
-
. , . . 2-2
,
, / .
. 3, 11 21.
, ,
, , ( 2,6 : 1
. 7,3 : 1),
/ .
, /
( 1) 31 %
. 48 76 %
, .49
,
,
. / 2% ,
, 30 %
. , / .
. ,
,
/ ( .
, ,
),
,
. , .
,
, (4,3 : 1),44
, , , ,
,
. , 1 (3,3 : 1).48
,
.
,
, -
.50 ,
,
, ,
. .19
,
: = 1:2.4; 50 32 28 2 0 40 6 4
50
,
: = 1:7.3)
Plesh, 2005® 61 47,5 32,8 32,7 ( ) 0( ) 0( ) 41 ( ) 6,5 ( ) 0( )
Manfredini, 285 ( =63; 50,2 38,6; 22,8 ; 19,3 50,2; 27,4 ; 30,2
200417 = 222)
Yap, 200348 191 ( = 53; 13 18 12,5 9,9 2,6 4,1 0,5 1 11,5 10,9 0,5 0 1,0 1,5
= 138) ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
16,9; 11,6; 9,4; 11,3; 3,7; 1,8; ; ; 5,6; 3,7; ; ; ; ;
9,4 21,7 13,7 9,4 2,1 5 0,7 1,4 13,7 13,7 0,7 1,4 2,1
List, 199649 82 50 26 28 34 0-4 16 23 0-6
210 US 46 30 18 24 43 38
32 ; 39 25 ; 31
- ; - .
( II III) , .
/
U)
U1
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
-
, ,
,
, 2 (10-35 % .
).
,
(
) .
(0-12 %).
,
2 (15,8 %).14 , ,
-
, .
, ,
.
,
3,
(
50 %). ,
43
,48
.
. , ,
,
. ,
.52 ,
,4447 .
,
,
.
/ . ,
,
,
. ,
, .
. ,
, .
-
.
.
,
,
. .
.54 ,
, . - .
,
-
. , ,
,
.
/
.65
, .
, ,
.56 , .
. , ,
, , -
. .
, , ,
.57 , .
.58 ,
, ,
.
,
, ,
( )
,
, , .
,
.
.
(IASP), «
(
, ) .
».1
.
.
.
, ,
. ,
1960- « .
» -
3-6 ,
, ,
.5
.23 ,
( )
.
- .6
-
( ).4-5 ,
, ,
,
.6-8
« -
»
. ,
,
,
- -
-
. ( . 3-1).
-
,
( ,
)78 , ( )
.
, ,
. : ( )
;
;
.
( )
(
, , .
). ,
, ,
,
( )
, .
. ,
. ,
.
( -
).
-
-
. ( . . 3-1). ,
,
,
-
,
( )
.
( ) (^ ) -
. 3-1. ( ) ( )
( )
-
. ( . 3-2).
( - ,
, )
. .
.
( / ) -
( , ,
I) ( 3-1 ).9 .610
,
-
, -
. .4'67
, / /
(
. www.rdc- tm dinternational.org)
.9 .
3 : ,
.
.
, /
.
,7
3-1. - .
,
,
:
• ( )
.6'7
•
( I / ):
,
I:
II:
III: ,
.
,
( ),
,
( ).
, ,
,
(
) 7'8” ( . 21).
,
,
,
.
« »
,
.
,
( . 3-3).
,
( )
. 3-2.
( Su vin en et al.7)
. 3-3.
.
,
. .
,
, /
.
( )
.712 .13
, .
,
.
. ,
,
, ( . 3-4):
• ( , .
); ,
• - ( ),
( , ,
.7
); ,
• , . .
. ,
: .
• - (
); ,
• ,
; ,
• .8
;
•
.
,
(
) .
,
.8’12'14'15
-
, ,
3-2. ,
(
)
:
•
•
•
• , , , , /
• , ,
•
• ( , )
:
•
•
•
• -
• -
•
• ( , ,
, , .)
•
:
•
• ( )
•
7
• ,
:
• ,
•
•
•
•
:
•
•
• ,
(
, - .
.).
, ( . / ).
. 3-2 -
.
. •
, ,
,
(
,
. ,
.), ,
.
, ,
. .
• ,
.
( . 3-2). ,
•
, . , ,
,
.
(
), , .
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
.8
, ,
.
• , ,
, ,
. -
. 3-5. . ,
,
. .10'17
.1819
,
, -
( . 3-5),
( ,
, ) ,
, .14 - ( . 3-6).
/
, ( I)
( , , , ( II) .
).
, . .
•
( ) .19 (SCL90R) .
.
.
/
/ (International RDC/ TMD
. Consortium).
.
, /
.7-914 .
( I) ,
« ,
» .
( II)
( .
,
)
( , . .
). 4 (
. ),
( ).
:
•
;
. 3-7. ,
: ;
: ( ) ; ,
;
;
: ; ; ,
, , , (
) ,
.8 ;
• ,
.
. ,
.1920
. , ,
, ,
, 3
( . 3-7):
• ;
• , .7'2122
. 3-8
.
,
.
.
,
,
,
,
. , ,
,
,
/ . .
,
,
.23 ,
.
. ,
.
( 3-3).
. ,
,
. ,
, .
,
, , ,
,
,
. ,
, .
. ,
.
.
.
.
, ,
, . .,
. .726
.
.
,
,
,
.
. ,
70-80 %.242S ,
,
.22
.
,
, ,
,23
.7
.
.17 , .
,
,
- 3-4.
( 3-4).
•
.
• -
.816
•
•
,
•
.24-25 ,
•
. ,
,
. .
,
. ,
.
,
(Heli Forssell),
. (Yrsa Le Bell) -
(Annikki Vaisto)
.
. -
(Pentti Kemppainen)
(Academy of Finland)
. .
.
.
,
. ,
, . .
, -
. .
,
.
,
.
. ,
- . ,
, , , ,
,
, ,
. .6
.
, ,
,
. ,
. ,
( .6
), ( ,
), , , 17
( ),
.1'
, .
.
-
,
( ,
, )
N GF
IV .
,
. TN F -
; TRPV - ; PG -
; N M D A - N- - - ;
-
, , . -
, . ,
.
, .
,
.
.1 ,
, , .
,
,
( , *), ,
( ,
* Catastrophizing ( .) -
).
.{ , .)
- + . .
(ASIC) pH. +
.
pH
-
94
. .
TRPV1 + pH. +
(
)
2 3
N M DA-
TrkA ( -
) (N GF)
1/ 2
4- ( ),
. - ( 2 ) . .
( IV) ( . 4-1).
(~1 / ) ,1
, . -
-
( III), , ,
(2,5-35 / ), .
, .
,
,
. III ,
IV ,
( ).
( ) ,
.8
.
- (ASIC,
TRPV1, / - -D- TRPV1) ( 2 3)
(NMDA) , ,
- - - -5- - ( . 4-1).
, - .10
.
- « » -
. , ,
( , ,
),
( )
. (trigeminal
brainstem sensory nuclear com plex, VBSNC)
. ( . 4-2).8
,
(
( 4-1). ),
(
4-1. - )
(
).
• -
,
,
• - - ,
, , , -
( ), ( )
( ).
.
,
,
,
- -
3- -5- -4-
( )
. ,5'11 -
, , .
. . ,
, . .12
( . . 4-2).
30
.
.
,
.
( ) ,
, .
-
.
, ,
, , ,
. ,
,
.
-
- (
). 2 3
(
)
, .
-
,
.
(G)
(SP),
N M DA-
( ).
( ) - ,
, .
.
( ), ,
.
.
.5
(NM DA- )
.
( . 4-3).
.
(CGRP),
NMDA- .
- , -1- ,
, ,
. , .
-
, ,
. (
,
. . 4-3 ,
),
b ( ,
. ,
, )
,
, . .
b .
, , .
( )
. -
( ) ,
. . ,
-
« »
.
.
,
.
. ,
. ,
, (
, , )
.
.
,
( [+]
. . 4-4).
-
( ).
( , , .20
,
. .)
.3'21 .
, ,
.
. -
.
.
.21
,
( )
. ,
-
, ( )
,
,
. , . 4-3
. ( )
. ( )
( ).
,22
« » .
.23
,
I . ( )
, ,
.
-1- - NMDA- . « »
. , ( ,
, , . .)
, .
.
. , ,
.
, ( ) .
,
. .
, ,
.
,
(
)
. ,
. (
) .
,
.
,
( .27 -
).
.25 ,
,
SLC6A4,
.26
.
.
- - .25
,
.25 ( ,
).
-
, .
.25 .2829
,
( ,
, )
,
,
.30-34
,
.30"32'34"36
, Lund .35 1991 .
,
.
.
.3536
( . 4-4).
- ,
.
( ).28'29 ( )
, .
( ).
,
, -
-
49
,
( ) .53 (
,
) ( )
, ( ,
.3854 , ,
. ),
,
, , ( ,
).55 ,
. ( , ,
, ) (
, )
. .56
,
,
. .57
,
,
,59 - ,
,
.60
.
20- ,
, ,
, ,
7. - ,
, ,66
, -
. (100 )
.
,
,
.6162 .6667
,
,
. .68 ,
,
.24 ,69
27 %
. .70'71
.
.24
/
( ,
,
, ) .72 /
,
,
, (
.6364 ).
73,
,
- , /
. -
.
,
( . 14)
-
, . 75 %
.37 .86
, ,
( , . .). ,
, ,
, (
. ).86 ,
. 87,
.86
.
- (International
Headache Society),
. .
,
, ( ).88
. ,
, 78 %
.37 .88 ,
, .89
. ( )
90
.
( ) .33 -
,
,
,
.91
. (
,
.86 , ,
, , )
.82 50 .
-
( ,
), , , .91
. ,
,
,
- - ( )
( )
- 78 %
( ), .7
( ) ,
.1
« - .
»,2
. Tasaki .
(Bell) « - ,
»3. MPT-
. ,
.8
- .4
,
( )
( ,
) ( .
, . .).
18 %
, 70 % ,
( ) , .
,
,
,
.56 6 % (
. 5-1. .
( ).
,
.
.
.
. 5-1 .
( )
( ), .
. 5-1 .
.
( ).
.
,
11 ),9 34 % ( ,
16-19 )10 31-34 % -
.1112
, .
,
-
,13 30
2 5
.14 ( . 5-1).
, ,
,
,
.
.
,
- . .
.
.
.15-17 ,
75 %
. , 6-12 - ,
, ,
.
: ,
, ,
-
( . ,
) , - ,
,
,
, .
50 %
(10-45 %).28
.
.29
Ch. trachomatis
, ,
.20 ,
, .
Ch. trachom atis
.
Henry . .
Mycoplasm a genitalium, , ,
Ch. trachomatis,
.21 (HLA),
(
, )
Neisseria gonorrhoeae22 . genitalium ,23 ,
HLA
.
HLA ,
.
, ,
. genitalium (86 %), Staphy ,
lococcus aureus (51,2 %), Mycoplasm a .30
fermentans/ orale (37,2 %), Actinobacillus ,
actinom ycetem com itans (25,6 %) St repto
coccus m itis (7 %).24 , ,
7 CREG. ,
. ,
, S. aureus
(60,6 %) HLA.
,
(20 %).
, Ch.
trachomatis -
(TNF-a)
6 (IL-6) 67 47 % ,
. .
Ch. trachomatis
Ch. trachomatis 16 8 %, .
, ,
, , Ch.
(36 5 %, trachomatis
),25-27
- .31
,33' 35 .37
-
. (Isberg)
11'12 (Westesson), -
, 60 %
,
,36 , ,
.
, .38
57 % Hall .,
.36 ,
.39
,
. ,
.40
1982 . (Welden Bell)
,
.3
, .41
,
( . 5-2).
(Atkinson) (Bates) .
,
.42'43 Sato .44
,
-
. 5-2. . .
( )3. .
. (
)3
. 5-3. . .
, ( ),
. ,
( ),
(
)37. . .
, ( ),
. ,
( ),
, ,
(
)37, .
.
(
)37
, ,
. Panmekiate .46 - , -
,
( = 54) .
20 :
,
.
. , ,
, ,
,
,
. ,
Ren .,
. ,
, ,
.46
, ,
. .
,
,
.
Kurita
.47 MPT-
,50-52
,
.48 - ,
151 ( 2:1 4:1 ).63'54
Kurita 49
,
(
. 5:1 9:1, ).711
4-6 , .5354
.
,
. .
3
.55 Abubaker
.
, ,
,5657 .65 ,
.56 80
(Cecil) (Archer)59
, ,
.
- ,
,
. , .
- :
.
20 ,
,
. , .
,
. ( ) 17 - .
.6^ Yasuoka .
.61
.66
,
(
.62 in vivo ),
-
.63 ,
.
.
.
. Okuda .
, .
.64
- .
,
,
.
.
.67 .7576
,
.68 1993 . Abubaker .
.77
.69 ,
( .
Nekora-Azak78) ,
.
, ,
.
.
14
.70
28 .71
,
.
,
. , ,
, , .
, 1948 . -
- . , (Cecil Wakeley)79
.
( ,
. .)
, ( ).
,83 , Gerhard
.,
, ,
(18,4 %)
( . 5-4).
( ,
) .84
-
( . 5-5 5-6). :
9,1 %
,
(1- ). 2-
( . 5-7 3-
5-8). 30,8 85,7 % ,
, . . ,
,
. ,
, , , .
.85
.
, ,
MPT-
. 86 ( . 5-9).
MPT-
(50 %) , ,
.80 (
)
,81 .
, ,87
. ,
.
36,3 %
, 26 % 39 %
, .
, ( ,
1,5:1 1,8:1, ).82
: .88
MPT-
,
, . Sullivan . ,
( ) 77 %
,89
. 5-5. .
, 24 . . .
. 5-6. .
.
.
.
. 5-7. .
, 4 .
. .
(
)
. 5-8. . 11 . . .
( )
.8490 « »
1945 . (Davis)
.
, .93
.91 ,
( .
) 95 %92.
.94
. ,
,
, ,95-97
,
. .98
22 25
.95 -
56 % ."
,
87 % .100
.
,
, -
. .
M cKay Christensen ,
.101 ,
. ,
Bergman . - « »
60 , 3-14
.
.102
53 (Costen),
.
.105106 1934 . -
,
.107
(53 45 %, ).
,
. , -
.
, 5
.
. - .
,
2 ,
,
.103 ,
Braun ., , 75
,
,
« » .
.104
. , ,
,
.
.115 Ramfjord ,
,
, ,
.117 , . .
, .120 ,
,
,
. .
,
,
« » .118
, , ,
-
. , .
,
,
.
.
,
.
.
( , ,
,
. Pullinger Seligman )
11 , ,
,
(
)
.120 ,
« » . ,
, ,
.
,
.
. ,
, ,
.
, (National Institute
of Health),
.1'122
, , ,
-
.123
.
,
,
( )
( ) 2 1967 .
24
5 . , -
,
, 124 ( . 5-10).
. «
» ( ).
« »
. , ,
, . ,
, ,
Pullinger Seligm an120
.121 .
, , ,
,
, ,
. .
- , ,134
,
. ,
. , .
,
,
.126 M PT- .
81 % .127
( . 5-16).
. ,
( . 5-11-5-13). ,
( . 5-14 .136
5-15), ,
( 3%
128)
21-30 .129 71 % .135
1950 . Ricketts - 68 %
.
,
.130
Wassm und ,
.131
(70 % .
), Nevakari 1984 . Solberg
. 5-10a-5-10f.
end . . ,
( , )
. 5-12. .
(51 ).
.
.
.
( )
, 9 % .144
13 39
,140 , ,
,
.141 .
Kavuncu .
.146
.142
. 895 -
.146
( , ,
) , ,
III
.143 39 % I
.
, d u e.
. 5-14. . . .
.
.
, -
, . (Farrar) d.
. .
. ,
.147 37 %
- .
. .
, 13 39
(30 %)
. , , ,
. 5-16.
.148 - 3 4 .
Agerberg .
- -
, .
,
,
,
.149 .
.160
Greenwood, .
,
.151
,
.
.152 Winocur .
.43157
15-16 .153 Conti . ,
,
.154 . ,
,
2002 , -
,
, .
.166
.
-
(Beight o n), .
•
.14
( ).156
,
, . . , .
. •
, .
24. Kim SJ, Park YH, Hong SP, Cho BO, Park JW, Kim 37. Atkinson WB, Bates RE. The effects of the angle
SG. The presence of bacteria in the synovial fluid of the articular eminence on anterior disk displace
of the temporomandibular joint and clinical sig ment. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:554- 555.
nificance: preliminary study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38. Isberg A, Westesson P-L. Steepness of articular
2003;61:1156- 1161. eminence and movement of the condyle and disk
25. Henry CH, Pitta M C, Wolford LM , Keene NH. Fre in asymptomatic temporomandibular joints. Oral
quency of chlamydial antibodies in patients with Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
internal derangement of the temporomandibular 1998;86:152- 157.
joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 39. Hall M B, Gibbs CC, Sclar AG. Association be
Endod 2001 ;91:287- 292. tween the prominence of the articular eminence
26. M eijer CJ, Calame JJ, de Windt EJ, Risse EK, Bleker and displaced TM J disks. J Craniomandibular Pract
OP, Kenemans P et al. Prevalence of chlamydia tra 1985;3:237- 239.
chomatis infection in a population of asymptomatic 40. Alsawaf M , Garlapo DA, Gale EN, Carter M J. The
women in a screening program for cervical cancer. relationship between condylar guidance and tem
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1989;8:127- 130. poromandibular joint clicking. J Prosthet Dent
27. Schachter J. Chlamydial infections. N Engl J Med 1989;61:349- 354.
1978:298:428- 435. 41. Kertens HCJ, Tuizing DB, Golding RP, Van der Kwast
28. Ostergaard L, Traulsen J, Birkelund S, Christiansen WAM . Inclination of the temporomandibular joint
G. Evaluation of urogenital chlamydia trachomatis eminence and anterior disc displacement. Int J Oral
infections by cell culture and the polymerase chain M axillofac Surg 1989;18:229- 232.
reaction using a closed system. Eur J Clin Microbiol 42. Roberts CA, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Sanchez-
Infect Dis 1991:10:1057- 1061. Woodworth RE, M anzione JV, Espeland M A et al.
29. Paegle Dl, Holmlund AB, Ostlund M R, Grillner L. Clinical and arthrographic evaluation of temporo
The occurrence of antibodies against chlamydia mandibular joint sounds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
species in patients with monoarthritis and chronic Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1986;62:373- 376.
closed lock of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral 43. Paesani D, Westesson P-L, Hatala MP, Tallents RH,
M axillofac Surg 2004;62:435- 439. Brooks SL. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis for TM J in
30. Henry CH, Nikaein A, Wolford LM . Analysis of hu ternal derangement and arthrosis. Oral Surg Oral
man leukocyte antigens in patients with internal de Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:360- 363.
rangement of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral 44. Sato S, Kawamura H, Motegi K, Takahashi K. M or
M axillofac Surg 2002;60:778- 783. phology of the mandibular fossa and the articular
31. Henry CH, Whittum-Hudson JA, Tull CT, Wolford eminence in temporomandibular joints with ante
LM . Reactive arthritis and internal derangement of rior disk displacement. Int J Oral M axillofac Surg
the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med 1996;25:236- 238.
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:e22- e26. 45. Panmekiate S, Petersson A, Akerman S. Angulation
32. Fuseler JW, Conner EM , Davis JM , Wolf RE, and prominence of the posterior slope of the emi
Grisham M B. Cytokine and nitric oxide production nence of the temporomandibular joint in relation to
in the acute phase of bacterial cell wall-induced ar disc position. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;19:205-
thritis. Inflammation 1997;21:113- 131. 208.
33. Quinn JH, Bazan NG. Identification of prostaglan 46. Ren YF, Isberg A, Westesson P-L. Steepness of the
din E2 and leukotriene B4 in the synovial fluid of articular eminence in the temporomandibular joint.
painful, dysfunctional temporomandibular joints. J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
Oral M axillofac Surg 1990;48:968- 971. 1995;80:258- 266.
34. Shafer DM , Assael L, White LB, Rossomando EF. Tu 47. Kurita H, Ohtsuka A, Kobayashi H, Kurashina K.
mor necrosis factor-alpha as a biochemical marker Flattening of the articular eminence correlates
of pain and outcome in temporomandibular joints with progressive internal derangement of the
with internal derangements. J Oral M axillofac Surg temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol
1994;52:786- 791. 2000;29:277- 279.
35. Fu , M a X, Zhang Z, Chen W. Tumor necrosis factor 48. Galante C, Paesani D, Tallents RH, Hatala M A,
in synovial fluid of patients with temporomandibu Katzberg RW, M urphy W. Angle of the articular
lar disorders. J Oral M axillofac Surg 1995;53:424- eminence in patients with temporomandibular
426. joint dysfunction and asymptomatic volunteers.
36. Isberg A, Stenstrom B, Isacsson C. Frequency of Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
bilateral temporomandibular joint disk displace 1995;80:242- 249.
ment in patients with unilateral symptoms: a 5-year 49. Kurita H, Ohtsuka A, Kobayashi H, Kurashina K.
follow-up of the asymptomatic joint. A clinical and Is the morphology of the articular eminence of
arthrotomographic study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol the temporomandibular joint a predisposing fac
1991;20:73- 76. tor for disc displacement? Dentomaxillofac Radiol
2000;29:159- 162.
80. Goddard G. Articular disk displacement of TM J due 98. Howard RP, Benedict JV, Raddin JH, Smith HL. As
to trauma. J Craniomandib Pract 1993;11:221—223. sessing neck extension-flexion as a basis for tem
81. Garcia R Jr. Air bag implicated in temporomandibu poromandibular joint dysfunction. J Oral M axillofac
lar joint injury. Cranio 1994;12:125- 127. Surg 1991;49:1210- 1213.
82. Holan G. Traumatic injuries to the chin: a survey 99. Pressman BD, Shellock FG, Schemes J, Schames M.
in a paediatric dental practice. Int J Paediatr Dent M R imaging of temporomandibular joint abnormal
1998;8:143- 148. ities associated with cervical hyperextension/ hyper-
83. Anderson Q. Trauma and internal derangements. flexion (whiplash) injuries. J Magn Reson Imaging
Temporomandibular Joint - Pain and Dysfunction, 1992;2:569- 574.
fifth annual meeting. Philadelphia, PA, 12- 14 No 100. Garcia R Jr, Arrington JA.Th e relationship between
vember 1987. cervical whiplash and temporomandibular joint in
84. Gerhard S, Ennemoser T, Rudisch A, Emshoff R. juries: an M RI study. Cranio 1996;14:233- 239.
Condylar injury: magnetic resonance imaging find 101. M cKay DC, Christensen LV. Whiplash injuries of
ings of temporomandibular joint soft-tissue chang the temporomandibular joint in motor vehicle
es. Int J Oral M axillofac Surg 2007;36:214- 218. accidents: speculations and facts. J Oral Rehabil
85. Goss AN, Bosanquet AG. The arthroscopic appear 1998;25:731- 746.
ance of acute mandibular trauma. J Oral M axillofac 102. Bergman H, Andersson F, Isberg A. Incidence of
Surg 1990;48:780- 783. temporomandibular joint changes after whiplash
86. Jones JK, Van Sickels JE. A preliminary report of arth trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998:171:1237-
roscopic findings following acute condylar trauma. J 1243.
Oral M axillofac Surg 1991;49:55- 60. 103. Sale H, Isberg A. Delayed temporomandibular joint
87. Harris SA, Rood JP, Testa HJ. Post-traumatic changes pain and dysfunction induced by whiplash trauma.
of the temporo-mandibular joint by bone scintigra J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:1084- 1091.
phy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17:173- 176. 104. Braun BL, DiGiovanna A, Schiffman E, BonnemaJ,
88. Katzberg RW, Tallents RH, Hayakawa K, M iller TL, Fricton J. A cross-sectional study of temporoman
Goske M J, Wood BP. Internal derangements of the dibular joint dysfunction in post-cervical trauma
temporomandibular joint: findings in the pediatric patients. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:24- 31.
age group. Radiology 1985;154:125- 127. 105. Wright WH. Deafness as influenced by malposition
89. Sullivan SM, Banghart PR, Anderson Q. Magnetic of the teeth. Natl Dent Assoc J 1920;7:979- 992.
resonance imaging assessment of acute soft tis 106. Decker JC. Traumatic deafness as a result of retru-
sue injuries to the temporomandibular joint. J Oral sion of condyles of mandible. Ann Otol Rhinol Lar-
M axillofac Surg 1995;53:763- 766. yngol 1925;34:519- 517.
90. Takaku S, Yoshida M , Sano T, Toyoda T. Magnetic 107. Costen JB. A syndrome of ear and sinus symptoms
resonance images in patients with acute traumatic dependent upon disturbed function of the tem
injury of the temporomandibular joint: a preliminary poromandibular joint. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1966;24:173- 177. 1934;43:1- 15.
91. Goss AN, Bosanquet AG, Tideman H. The accuracy 108. Greene CS, Mohl ND, McNeill C, Clark GT, True-
of temporomandibular joint arthroscopy. J Cranio love EL. Temporomandibular disorders and science:
maxillofac Surg 1987;15:99- 102. a response to the critics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
92. Tasaki M M , Westesson P-L. Temporomandibular Orthop 1999;116:430- 431.
joint: diagnostic accuracy with sagittal and coronal 109. Rubinoff M S, Gross A, M cCall WD. Conventional
M R imaging. Radiology 1993;186:723- 729. and nonoccluding splint therapy compared for pa
93. Davis AG. Injuries of the cervical spine. J Am Med tients with myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome.
Assoc 1945;127:149- 156. Gen Dent 1987;35:502- 506.
94. Burgess JA, Dworkin SF. Litigation and post-trau 110. Dao TTT, Lavigne GJ, Charbonneau A, Feine JS,
matic TM D: how patients report treatment out Lund JP. The efficacy of oral splints in the treat
come. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:105- 110. ment of myofascial pain of the jaw muscles: a con
95. Weinberg S, Lapointe H. Cervical extension-flexion trolled clinical trial. Pain 1994;56:85- 94.
injury (whiplash) and internal derangement of the 111. Goodman P, Greene CS, Laskin DM . Response of
temporomandibular joint. J Oral M axillofac Surg patients with myofascial pain-dysfunction syn
1987;45:653- 656. drome to mock equilibration. J Am Dent Assoc
96. M annheimer J, Attanasio R, Cinotti WR, Pertes R. 1976;92:755- 758.
Cervical strain and mandibular whiplash: effects 112. Tsolka P, Dip DS, Morris RW, Preiskel HW. Oc
upon the craniomandibular apparatus. Clin Prev clusal adjustment therapy for craniomandibular
Dent 1989;11:29- 32. disorders: a clinical assessment by double-blind
97. Dunn JJ, M annheimer JS. The cervical spine. In: method. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:957- 964.
Pertes RA, Gross SG (eds). Clinical M anagement of 113. Schuyler CH. Fundamental principles in the correc
Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain. tion of occlusal disharmony, natural and artificial.
Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1995:13. J Am Dent Assoc 1935;22:1193- 1202.
145. Plunkett GA, West VC. Systemic joint lax 152. Chun DS, Koskinen-Moffett L. Distress, jaw habits,
ity and mandibular range of movement. Cranio and connective tissue laxity as predisposing factors
1988;6:320- 326. to TM J sounds in adolescents. J Craniomandib Dis
146. Westiing L. Temporomandibular joint dysfunc ord 1990;4:165- 176.
tion and systemic joint laxity. Swed Dent J Suppl 153. Winocur E, Gavish A, Halachmi M , Bloom A, Gazit
1992;81:1- 79. E. Generalized joint laxity and its relation with oral
147. Perrini F, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Ribeiro RF, habits and temporomandibular disorders in ado
Kyrkanides S, Moss M E. Generalized joint laxity lescent girls. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:614- 622.
and temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 154. Conti PCR, Miranda JES, Araujo CRP. Relation
1997;11:215- 221. ship between systemic joint laxity, TM J hyper
148. Dijkstra PU, de Bont LGM , Stegenga B, Boering G. translation, and intra-articular disorders. Cranio
Temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and gener 2000;18:192- 197.
alized joint hypermobility. Cranio 1992;10:221-227. 155. Dijkstra PU, Kropmans TJB, Stegenga B. The as
149. Agerberg G. M aximal mandibular movements in sociation between generalized joint hypermobility
teenagers. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 1974;12: and temporomandibular joint disorders: a system
79- 102. atic review. J Dent Res 2002;81:158- 163.
150. McCarroll RS, Hesse JR, Naeije M , Yoon CK. 156. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular
M andibular border positions and their relation mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis
ships with peripheral joint mobility. J Oral Rehabil 1973;32:413- 418.
1987;14:125- 131. 157. Roberts CA, Katzberg RW, Tallents RH, Espeland
151. Greenwood LF. Is temporomandibular joint dys M A, Handelman SL. Correlation of clinical param
function associated with generalized joint hyper eters to the arthrographic depiction of temporo
mobility? J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:701- 703. mandibular joint internal derangements. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66:32- 36.
- . , , ,
.
« -
» ( )
-
( ), -
, ,
.
.
,
.
,
,
.
.
. , ,
, .
, .
, ,
. . ,
,
,
, .
.
, ,
,
( , ,
.1 . .),
.
,
,
( ). .
,
, ,
,
. ,
,
,
, .
.
.
( ) ,
.
. ,
.
, ,
( -
). .
, .6
.
,
( . 6-1).
,
.2 ,
, .
,
, ,
, ,
.
.3
, , ,
,
. ,
, ,
( . 6-2).7
.4'5
.
,
><-
. 6-2.
. , 0,14-0,36 %
,89 ,
. , Tanaka .
.,5
-
, .
.
,
. .
.5
,
.5 44 %
, , 45 % -
11 % - -
. ( ). ,
D- .8
D-N- , ,
.10 .89
. 6-3. . . :
( ), - ( )
2 ( 2). .
2
( . 6-3).
. , Marchetti .12
,
,
.8 . ,
,
.
. 2
Chang .11 ,
,13
,14
,
. , .
, ,
.11 .
2 ( 2)
,
.
, ,
. 2 30 %
,
.9 1-3 %.1S ,
, «
», .
,
. Nitzan .10 , ,
.
2,
( . 6-4).16
( )
,
, ( . 6-5).
.
. ,
-
,
, ,
, . .
,
.1718 ,
, .
1980 .
. ,
,
.19
.
.
( ) ,
. ,
,
( ) .
,
. ,
. 6-5. ( )
( )
,
, . .21
,
8-200 . .(
63,9 ± 52,25 . .) ( . 6-6),20
, , ,22
, .
. ,
, .
.
-
( , ) ( . . 6-6).
, .
,
, , ( ,
.21 , ,
,
, )
.23
( , ,
) . .
, ,
, ,
. , ,
. 6-6.
:
-
— —
. 6-7. ( )
.
, , -
.
,
,
.19-24'25 .
,
,
,
,
. .
,
. ( . 6-7).
,
,
( . . 6-2).26-27
,
, ,
, Arnett .28 .38 ,
«
». ,
.
, , • .
, ,
,
. .36
,
.19-28
• . ,
,19 .
.29
,
.3031 ,
2,5 86 .
.37
2000 • .
300 ,
. , ,
• .
, .
, .3233
, 50 %-
.38
. , 2q, 9q, 11 q
16 .
: VDR,
.33 AGC1, IGF-1, ER-oc, TGF-(5, CRTM (
), CRTL (
, ),
2- , 9- 11- . ,
.34
,
, .38 ,
,
( ).
, .
, • . ,
-
,34 , ,
. , .
,
.
,
( ,
. )
, .42
.
,
, .34
,
( )
(
).39 , .43
,
40 ,
, -3,
, , , (Amir G, BJOM S, ,
2009) ( . 6-8 6-8 ).
, ,
( - -
. .), ,
,
.
• . .
,
. ,
.
, ,
. ,
,
. , .
,
,
, .44
. 6-8. ,
. (2- ). .
. . (
- , )
,
, .
, ,
. , .
,
. ,
, , , .17
,
,
.
,
.45 .
( ,
),
.
,
, .
,
. .
, ,
,
,
( . 6-9).49
,
. 6-9.
, ,
.50 , .
• .
, . . -
.
,
( ) . , , -
.
, , •
.
,
51 -
.52 , ,
.
, ,
.
( , ,
, ) .
,
. ,
,
,
, , ,
,51
.
.53 , .54
,
( ,
)
. ,
.
2, • .
( . . 6- ). ,
, .
, . , 1 (IL-1),
2 6 (IL-6) -
? .
,
2,
,
.4066
• .
( ,
, )
,
.
.
. 6-10.
. ,
,
, -
.56
,
, ( . 6-10).
, .
. 6-11. 1.
, ,
?
,
2.
(TNF-P), , ,
.34 , ?
. Wilkes67 ,
, .
,
. , -
. 6-12.
,
,
.
,
. , .
, ,
.
, .
.58
, .1
.62'63
59 ( . 6-11)
(Nitzan, ).
, ,
.60 ( . 6-12). -
.61 ,
. ,
.
, .
, , ,
,
.
( - .1564
),
, ,
.
.
,
(Ludin ., , ,
, 2009). ( )
, . .
,
, (Amir G, BJOM FS, .
, 2009). ,
, ( ) .
, , . ,
. .
,
,
,
,46
. .
3-7 % , ,
16-59 %, .
33-86 %, 11 % ,
,
.19'47 ,
. ,
« - »,
.
.
. ,
- ( )
( / ).48 .
.
,
: .
,
. ( )
,
.66
.65
,
, , ,
. 6-13.
.
,
.
. .
, .
( )
,
. ,
- ( ),
,
, . ,
, ,
.67
.
,
.69
. Undt .68 ,
.69
. ,
, . ,
. -
. 6-14.
,
. ,
. .
, . ,
, . ( )
, , .
,
.
. • -
.
.
• . / .
,
, ,
,
,
. , ,
, ,
,
, , .
, , ,
,
. , ,
(
), . .
( ), ( . 6-14). ,
,
, , ,
. , ,
, ,
.
. , ,
,
. ,
.
. , ,
,
,
( . ).
.
. ,
,
,
-
.
, .
. ,
.
( ,
,
) - ,
.
. ,
,
.
.19
,
.
, ,
.
.
,
,
. .
( )
,
. .70
. 6-15. -
. a-f .
. .
.
. .
, .
, d.
,
.
. f. ,
. g-j. .
.
, h.
, .
, j.
,
,
.
, ,
,
. . -
, ,
.
.
( ).
,
81,2 % ,
.20 .
5% , .71
,
, .
.
,
, ,
,
.
, .
.
. 6-16.
. .
. .
. .
, ,
d. . .
- .
f.
.
. . h.
• . ,
.
( ) ,
,
, .
, -
,
. ,
, -
. ( ),
.7273
.
,
68,4 % ,
. 73
• . ( . 6-15).
, - ,
,
,
. . ,
, , ( .
6-16). , 31,6
. %
-
, .
. , ,
, ,
, .
(Nitzan,
, 1994) .
. • ,
,
,
.
• .
.
•
, ,
1. Loughner , M iller J, Broumand V, Cooper . The
development of strains, forces and nociceptor ac
.
tivity in retrodiscal tissues of the temporomandibu
• lar joint of male and female goats. Exp Brain Res
1997;113:311- 326.
( ) 2. Laskin DM . Etiology and pathogenesis of internal
derangement of the temporomandibular joint: cur
. , rent controversies in surgery for internal derange
ments of the temporomandibular joint. Oral M axil
, lofac Surg Clin North Am 1994;6:217.
. 3. Dijkgraaf LC, de Bont LG, Boering G, Liem RS.
Structure of the normal synovial membrane of the
• temporomandibular joint: a review of the literature.
J Oral M axillofac Surg 1996;54:332- 338.
4. de Bont LG, Liem RS, Boering G. Ultrastructure of
the articular cartilage of the mandibular condyle:
aging and degeneration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
. Pathol 1985;60:631- 641.
• 5. Tanaka E, Detamore M S, Tanimoto K, Kawai N.
Lubrication of the temporomandibular joint. Ann
Biomed Eng 2008;36:14- 29.
6. Charles C, Boyer CC, Williams TW, Stevens FH.
. Blood supply of the temporomandibular joint.
. J Dent Res 1964;43:224- 228.
7. Levick JR. The influence of hydrostatic pressure
on trans-synovial fluid movement and on capsular
expansion in the rabbit knee. J Physiol 1979;289:
69- 82.
. 8. Schwarz IM, Hills BA. Surface-active phospholipid
• as the lubricating component of lubricin. Br J Rheu
matol 1998;37:21- 26.
. 9. Hills BA, Monds M K. Enzymatic identification of the
70 % load-bearing boundary lubricant in the joint. Br J
Rheumatol 1998;37:137- 142.
. 10. Nitzan DW, Nitzan U, Dan P, Yedgar S. The role of
hyaluronic add in protecting surface-active phos
• pholipids from lysis by exogenous phospholipase
A(2). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001;40:336- 340.
44. Burner TW, Rosenthal . Diabetes and rheumatic 60. de Bont LG, Boering G, Liem RS, Eulderink F,
diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2009;21:50- 54. Westesson P-L. Osteoarthritis and internal de
45. Polzer K, Diarra D, Zwerina J, Schett G. Inflamma rangement of the temporomandibular joint: a light
tion and destruction of the joints: the Wnt pathway. microscopic study. J Oral M axillofac Surg 1986;44:
Joint Bone Spine 2008;75:105- 107. 634- 643.
46. Carlsson GE. Epidemiology and treatment need 61. de Bont LG, Stegenga B. Pathology of temporo
for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain mandibular joint internal derangement and osteoar
1999;13:232- 237. throsis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;22:71- 74.
47. Mejersjo C, Hollender L. TM J pain and dysfunction: 62. Zarb GA, Carlsson GE. Temporomandibular dis
relation between clinical and radiographic find orders: osteoarthritis. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:
ings in the short and long term. Scand J Dent Res 295- 306.
1984;92:241- 248. 63. M ow VC, Ateshian GA. Lubrication and wear of
48. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibu diarthrodial joints. In: M ow VC, Hayes WC (eds).
lar disorders: implications for the investigation of Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics. Philadelphia, PA:
etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:275- 315.
291- 305. 64. Lajeunesse D, Reboul P. Subchondral bone in os
49. Forster H, Fisher J. The influence of continuous teoarthritis: a biologic link with articular cartilage
sliding and subsequent surface wear on the fric leading to abnormal remodeling. Curr Opin Rheu
tion of articular cartilage. Proc Inst Mech Eng H matol 2003;15:628- 633.
1999;213:329- 345. 65. Stegenga B. Osteoarthritis of the temporomandib
50. Pufe T, Kurz B, Petersen W, Varoga D, Mentlein ular joint organ and its relationship to disc displace
R, Kulow S et al. The influence of biomechanical ment. J Orofac Pain 2001;15:193- 205.
parameters on the expression of VEGF and en-
dostatin in the bone and joint system. Ann Anat 66. Lobbezoo F, Drangsholt M , Peck C, Sato H, Kopp
2005;187:461- 472. S, Svensson P. Topical review: new insights into
51. Fukuoka Y, Hagihara M , Nagatsu T, Kaneda T. The the pathology and diagnosis of disorders of the
relationship between collagen metabolism and tem temporomandibular joint. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:
poromandibular joint osteoarthrosis in mice. J Oral 181-191.
M axillofac Surg 1993;51:288- 291. 67. Gynther GW, Tronje G, Holmlund AB. Radiographic
52. Kawai Y, Kubota E, Okabe E. Reactive oxygen spe changes in the temporomandibular joint in patients
cies participation in experimentally induced arthritis with generalized osteoarthritis and rheumatoid ar
of the temporomandibular joint in rats. J Dent Res thritis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
2000;79:1489- 1495. Endod 1996;81:613- 618.
53. Zardeneta G, Milam SB, Lee T, Schmitz JP. Detec 68. Undt G, Wild K, Reuther G, Ewers R. MRI-based
tion and preliminary characterization of matrix met stereolithographic models of the temporomandib
alloproteinase activity in temporomandibular joint ular joint: technical innovation. J Craniomaxillofac
lavage fluid. Int J Oral M axillofac Surg 1998;27: Surg 2000;28:258- 263.
397- 403. 69. Nakaoka K, Hamada Y, Holmlund AB, Saito T, Arai
54. Levine JD, Khasar SG, Green PG. Neurogenic G, Horiuchi T et al. The changes of joint effusion on
inflammation and arthritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci MRI and arthroscopic findings after visually guided
2006;1069:155- 167. TM J irrigation correlated to the clinical outcome.
55. Milam SB. Pathophysiology and epidemiol Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
ogy of TM J. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2009;108:99- 104.
2003;3:382- 390, discussion 406- 387. 70. Nitzan DW. Arthrocentesis-incentives for using this
56. Martel-Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, Fahmi H, Tardif G, minimally invasive approach for temporomandib
Pelletier JP. New thoughts on the pathophysiology ular disorders. Oral M axillofac Surg Clin North Am
of osteoarthritis: one more step toward new thera 2006;18:311- 328.
peutic targets. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2006;8:30- 36. 71. Dimitroulis G. The role of surgery in the manage
57. Wilkes C. Internal derangement of the TM J. Arch ment of disorders of the temporomandibular joint:
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:469. a critical review of the literature. Part 2. Int J Oral
58. Nitzan DW. The process of lubrication impairment M axillofac Surg 2005;34:231- 237.
and its involvement in temporomandibular joint disc 72. Kendell BD, Frost DE. Arthrocentesis atlas. Oral
displacement: a theoretical concept. J Oral M axil M axillofac Surg Clin North Am 1996;4:1- 14.
lofac Surg 2001 ;59:36- 45. 73. Nitzan DW, Price A. The use of arthrocentesis for
59. Scapino RP. Histopathology associated with malpo the treatment of osteoarthritic temporomandibular
sition of the human temporomandibular joint disc. joints. J Oral M axillofac Surg 2001;59:1154- 1159,
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;55:382- 397. discussion 1160.
(American Academy of Sleep , .
M edicine),
, ,
( ) .813-16
.1
-
(American Academy of Orofacial Pain)
.12
,
, , -
.2 -
( ).
-
,
.
.
-
( ).
, -
.3-4 ,
.5"12 ,
, .
. ,
6 20 %
, , -
, ,
3-5 % .1617 ,
18
,
50 , .19 ,
, .29 ,
(
. )
. ,
,
,1320 - ,
, .
, ,
, .
.5-8
, , ,
.11'12'21-23
,
,
,2425 ,
, 9 2008 .
.26
, , PubMed.
:
(2073
.69 ), -
, - ,
, .
,
.
. , • ,
, ,
.27 ( ).
• ,
,
. ,
( )
( ).
- • ,
.28
. « »
•
. , ,
,
.
, .
. ,
.
-
«
» « -
»
613 , 81 -
( . 7-1).
34 ( ), .
.
« » .
« - » ,
659 ,
.
, .
.
« » -
« » .
57 , « » «
» - 164 , ,30
.
Medline (Hill) ( . 7-2).31
Plus .
, 37
( ),
. .
• .
,
- 613 81
- 659 20
57 12
164 23
, • : ,
. .
-
,
,
. .
• .
.
. ( ) ,
•
. . ,
.
.
• .
( ) .
(
).
7-2. -
(1965)31
(Manfredini
Lobbezoo, 2009)
-
:
,
- ,
: )
. . Baba
- .33
103
.
, .
Van Seim s .32'35
- . . ,
, .
,
( . 7-3).32-35 .
Rossetti .34 ,
,
( ) ( . 7-4).
( ). ,
,
. , 36'37 ,3839
,
( , ,40
, .
7-3. : ,
( ) ( ) ( )
(
)
Van Seim s, 4 ; 140
20 0835 (20- 30 %
)
Ro sset t i, 14 ; 1
2008 ;
14
7-4. : , ( )
(
)
Storm , 200741 22 ; -
46
Osterberg, 913 ( )
200737 70
Sato, 200642 229 ( -
-
)
Johansso n, 17138
200636 50-60
Van der 529
M eulen, 200643
Casanova- 506
Rosado, 200640
Kobs, 200544 185
; 114
Glaros, 200545 96
;
Carlsson, 135
200446 15 (
20 )
M anfredini, 212 ;
200347 77 ,
Velly, 200348 83
; 100 ,
Chung, 200051 26
(
)
M olina, 199952 276
.53
29 , ( / ).57 M anfredini .47
,
(58 44,1 %,
34-44 % 55-76 %, . ).
Ciancaglini .54 ,
(6-30 %) / ,
. ,
, (71,4 53,3 % 60,9 %,
). ,
.
,
, .
.
, Molina .,52'55
80 %
, .
(57 %),
(133 ).56 ( . 7-5).
133 ,
, .
37 % .56 ,
, .
Manfredini .47
7-5. : ,
,
Perg am alian, 84
200361 ,
. -
.3
,
,
.29 ,
, 18 45 . ,
,
. , .63
, ,
, ,64 65-66
,
.
70 %.
, ,
,
,
(
). , ( . Svensson Graven-Nielsen,67
, Svensson et al.4),
,
, ,
. ( ) .
,
.
,
, .
,
. , , ,
.
,
,
, ,
, .6869
, . . ,
. ,70
, ,
. .
,
.71
, ,
, ,
, -
7-6. : ( )
To risu, 20 0673 23
30- ,
;
Arim a, 199976 12 9 5-
;
3 ,
Plesh , 199877 14 2
;
24
Glaro s, 199872 5 17- (10
); (1- 8 ;
); 10-15 )
- -
7-7. :
Perez del
Palo m ar, 200880
Tanaka, 200881
,
Pileicikiene,
200782
Tanaka, 200783
Perez del
Palo m ar, 200685 ( ,
( ) ,
)
Ch o i, 200586
Tanaka, 200187 No
- - ; - ; - -
; / -
( . 7-6) Glaros .
,
( . 7-7).
20 8 . ,90 ,
,
.46'7072 ,
25 %
.7679
/ . ,
,
,
.91-93
,
. , -
,
« »
, .
.
. -
.
,
. , .
,
, .
. Hirose .84
, .
.
.
, ,
,88 .97 ,
, ,
, ,
, .89 . ,
-
.98" ,
.68
Perez del Palomar .80 .
,
-
.
, . .
,
Lobbezoo Lavigne3
. .
,
.
. Perez M olina .52
del Palomar .88
.
,
. ,
,
, ,
.
. ,
. , . ,
,
, . ,
. ,
.35'43'58'61
. ,
, .
,
. , .
. , -
,
,
, ,
.78'91 ,
-
.
,
, .
. ,
,
( , , -
)
( ,
). , .
,
.67 ,
, . ,
,78'79100 , / ,
.101
, .
.
,
, .
,
.
. , ,
,
. .
,
, -
. ,
. ,
.
,
- ,
. ,
, , .
,
,
.
.
( ),
,
.
.
, ,
. , . , ,
, ,
. , , -
,
, . ,
. , ,
. ,
, .
.
,
.
, .
,
32. Van Seims , Lobbezoo F, Wicks DJ, Hamburger 44. Kobs G, Bernhardt O, Kocher T, M eyer G. Oral
HL, Naeije M . Craniomandibular pain, oral para- parafunctions and positive clinical findings. Stoma-
functions, and psychological stress in a longitudinal tologija 2005;7:81- 83.
case study. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:738- 745. 45. Glaros AG, Williams K, Lausten L. Predicting facial
33. Baba K, Haketa T, Sasaki Y, Ohyama T, Clark GT. pain: role of parafunctions, emotions and stress.
Association between masseter muscle activity lev J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:451- 458.
els recorded during sleep and signs and symptoms 46. Carlsson GE, Magnusson T, Egermark I. Prediction
of temporomandibular disorders in healthy young of demand for treatment of temporomandibular
adults. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:226- 231. disorders based on a 20-year follow-up study. J Oral
34. Rossetti LM , Rossetti PH, Conti PC, de Araujo CRP. Rehabil 2004;31:511- 517.
Association between sleep bruxism and temporo 47. Manfredini D, Cantini E, Romagnoli M , Bosco
mandibular disorders: a polysomnographic pilot M . Prevalence of bruxism in patients with differ
study. Cranio 2008;26:16- 24. ent research diagnostic criteria for temporoman
35. Van Seims M K, Lobbezoo F, Visscher CM , Naeije M. dibular disorders (RDC/ TM D) diagnoses. Cranio
Myofascial temporomandibular disorder pain, para- 2003;21:279- 285.
functions and psychological stress. J Oral Rehabil 48. Velly AM , Gornitsky M , Philippe P. Contributing
2008;35:45- 52. factors to chronic myofascial pain: a case-control
36. Johansson A, Unell L, Carlsson GE, Soderfeldt B, study. Pain 2003;104:491- 499.
Hailing A. Risk factors associated with symptoms 49. Choi YS, Choung PH, Moon HS, Kim SG. Temporo
of temporomandibular disorders in a population mandibular disorders in 19-year-old Korean men.
of 50- and 60-year-old subjects. J Oral Rehabil J Oral M axillofac Surg 2002;60:797- 803.
2006;33:473- 481. 50. Celic R, Jerolimov V, Panduric J. A study of the influ
37. Osterberg T, Carlsson GE. Relationship between ence of occlusal factors and parafunctional habits
symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and on the prevalence of signs and symptoms of TM D.
dental status, general health and psychomatic fac Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:43- 48.
tors in two cohorts of 70-year-old subjects. Gero- 51. Chung SC, Kim YK, Kim HS. Prevalence and pat
dontology 2007;24:129- 135. terns of nocturnal bruxofacets on stabilization
38. M und t T, M ack F, Schwahn C, Bernhardt O, Kocher splints in temporomandibular disorder patients.
T, John U et al. Gender differences in association Cranio 2000;18:92- 97.
between occlusal support and signs of temporo 52. Molina OF, Dos Santos J Jr, Nelson SJ, Nowlin T.
mandibular disorders: results of the population- A clinical study of specific signs and symptoms of
based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Int J CM D in bruxers classified by the degree of severity.
Prosthodont 2005;18:232- 239. Cranio 1999;17:268- 279.
39. Gesch D, Bernhardt O, M ack F, John U, Kocher T, 53. Kampe T, Tagdae T, Bader G, Edman G, Karlsson S.
Alte D. Association of malocclusion and functional Reported symptoms and clinical findings in a group
occlusion with subjective symptoms of TM D in of subjects with longstanding bruxing behaviour.
adults: results of the Study of Health in Pomerania J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:581- 587.
(SHIP). Angle Orthod 2005;75:183- 190. 54. Ciancaglini R, Gherlone E, Radaelli G. The relation
40. Casanova-Rosado JF, Medina-Solas CE, Vallejos- ship of bruxism with craniofacial pain and symp
Sanchez AA, Casanova-Rosado AJ, Hernandez- toms from the masticatory system in the adult
Prado B, Avila-Burgos L. Prevalence and associated population. J Oral Rehabil 2001 ;28:842- 848.
factors for temporomandibular disorders in a group 55. Molina OF, Dos Santos J Jr, Nelson SJ, Nowlin T.
of Mexican adolescents and youth adults. Clin Oral Profile of TM D and bruxer compared to TM D and
Investig 2006;10:42- 49. nonbruxer patients regarding chief complaint, pre
41. Storm C, Wanman A. A two-year follow-up study vious consultations, modes of therapy, and chronic-
of temporomandibular disorders in a female Sami ity. Cranio 2000;18:205- 219.
population: validation of cases and controls as 56. Molina OF, Dos Santos J Jr, Nelson SJ, Grossman
predicted by questionnaire. Acta Odontol Scand E. Prevalence of modalities of headaches and brux
2007;65:341- 347. ism among patients with craniomandibular disorder.
42. Sato F, Kino K, Sugisaki M , Haketa T, Amemori Y, Cranio 1997;15:314- 325.
Ishikawa T et al. Teeth contacting habit as a con 57. Dworkin S, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria
tributing factor to chronic pain in patients with for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria
temporomandibular disorders. J Med Dent Sci examinations and specifications, critique. J Crani
2006;53:103- 109. omandib Disord Fac Oral Pain 1992;6:301- 355.
43. Van der Meulen M J, Lobbezoo F, Aartman IH, 58. Janal M N, Raphael KG, Klausner J, Teaford M . The
Naeije M . Self-reported oral parafunctions and pain role of tooth-grinding in the maintenance of myo
intensity in temporomandibular disorder patients. fascial face pain: a test of alternate models. Pain
J Orofac Pain 2006;20:31- 35. Med 2007;8:486- 496.
89. Proske U. Muscle tenderness from exercise: mecha 97. M , Aarnts MP, Koolstra JH, Feilzer AJ, Van
nisms? J Physiol 2005;564:259- 268. Eijden TM GJ. Dynamic properties of the human
90. Lund JP, Stohler CS. Effects of pain on muscular ac temporomandibular joint disc. J Dent Res 2001 ;80:
tivity in temporomandibular disorders and related 876- 880.
conditions. In: Stohler CS, Carlson DS (eds). Bio 98. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA. Quantification and vali
logical and Psychological Aspects of Orofacial Pain. dation of predictive values of occlusal variables in
Craniofacial Growth Series 29. Center for Human temporomandibular disorders using a multifactorial
Growth and Development. Ann Arbor, M l: Univer analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:66- 75.
sity of M ichigan, 1994:75- 91. 99. Landi N, Manfredini D, Tognini F, Romagnoli M ,
91. Lavigne GJ, Rompre PH, Montplaisir JY, Lobbezoo Bosco M . Quantification of the relative risk of
F. M otor activity in sleep bruxism with concomitant multiple occlusal variables for muscle disorders
jaw muscle pain: a retrospective pilot study. Eur J of the stomatognathic system. J Prosthet Dent
Oral Sci 1997;105:92- 95. 2004;92:190- 195.
92. Arim aT, Arendt-Nielsen L, Svensson P. Effect of jaw 100. Clark GT, Adler RC, Lee JJ. Jaw pain and tender
muscle pain and soreness evoked by capsaicin be ness levels during and after repeated sustained
fore sleep on orofacial motor activity during sleep. maximum voluntary protrusion. Pain 1991 ;45:
J Orofac Pain 2001;15:245- 256. 17-22.
93. Lobbezoo F, van Seims M KA, Naeije M . Masticatory 101. Dao TTT, Lund JP, Lavigne GJ. Comparison of pain
muscle pain and disordered jaw motor behavior: lit and quality of life in bruxers and patients with
erature review over the past decade. Arch Oral Biol myofascial pain of the masticatory muscles. J Oro
2006;51:713- 720. fac Pain 1994;8:350- 356.
94. Korioth T, Romilly D, Hannam A. Three-dimensional 102. Imamura K, Ozawa H, Hiraide T, Takahashi N,
finite element analysis of the dentate human man Shibasaki Y, Fukuhara T. Continuously applied
dible. Am J Phys Anthropol 1992;88:69- 96. compressive pressure induces bone resorption by
95. M , Koolstra JH, Van Ruijven LJ, Van Eijden a mechanism involving prostaglandin E synthesis.
TM GJ. Three-dimensional finite element analysis J Cell Physiol 1990;144:222- 228.
of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Bio 103. Quinn TM , Grodzinsky AJ, Buschmann M D, Kim
mech 2000;33:307- 316. YJ, Hunziker EB. Mechanical compression alters
96. Donzelli PS, Gallo LM , Spilker PL, Palla S. Biphasic proteoglycan deposition and matrix deformation
finite element simulation of the TM J disc from in around individual cells in cartilage explants. J Cell
vivo kinematic and geometric measurements. J Bio Sci 1998;111:573- 583.
mech 2004;37:1787- 1791.
- ( ).
. .
,
.
.
.
-
( )
XIX
,
,
. :
, ,
,
,1 .
,
,
, ,
. .
,
,
- .
1934 , .8
(Costen) ,
,
-
, , .9
.2
(
, 3 21 ).
( . 8-1). ,
, 75
. ,
( )
( ) , .
,
. ,
.
.
(Schwartz)3 (Laskin)4 ,
. ,
, ,
, .
.
(Gold)5
, (
)
. (
,
, ) .
- , .
. « »
, , ,
, .
, « -
»
, . . ,
( . Rollm ann
Gillesp ie,6 Suvinen et al.7). -
1934
( )
1955
1969 :
1975
1987
1992 -
,
.
.
.
, ,
( . 14-19). . , ,
.
,
- , ( ) ,
,
,
,
. .11
,
,
,
, , ,1213
.
,
,
,
- ( )
.910 ,
, .14-17 ,
,
,
.
. 6.
, ,
,
.18-21 , .
,
, ,
. ,
.
,
( , -
)
.22
.28
.23
, . ,
,
.24 .
,
,
. ,
,
, .
.
:
. ( )
, ( ).
90 % (
),
.25 ,
.26 .
,
, .
.27
( )
.
,
,
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
. .
,
, , ,
, .
-
. ( . 8-2).
,
,
, , .
.
.
. .29
,
.
.
.
.
,
,
: 1) -
8-2. -
.32
;
2)
. .3334 ,
, ,
,
.35 ,
,
,
,
, ( . 8-2 8-2 ).
( . 8-1 -8-1 ).
, ,
.
,
, ,
. .
, ,
.
.30'31 ,
,
II .3637
,
. ,
, .
6
. 8-2 8-2 .
.
8-3.
.
, -
.
.
,
. ,
. 8-3. .39
( , )
( , )
II
,
,
,
, . .
II 4041 ( . 8-4).
, .
-
38 ( . 8-3). ,
, ,
,
, , ,
.42
( . 8-3). ,
.
,
.43-44
,
.
Ferrario .,4546 ( )
( . 8-5).
.
.
,
, .
, , . ,
,
.
.
.
( ) ,
.
,
. . ,
-
. 8-5. , . - ;M- ;
LPT - ; DF - ; SF -
, ,
.
,
. -
,
,
- , .
. .
,
,
- .
.
,15
,
.
( )
( )
« ».
,
,
( )
, , , ( )
. .
,
. ( = F/ S).
, ,
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
,
( . 8-4).
8-4.
6
( ) ( )
0
( ) (
)
( )
( ) .
« » ,
, - ,
, .
.
,
, ,
.4748 ,
, , .
,
,49 . ,
, ,
, ,
-
.
• ( . 8-5).52
?
• ,
,
? .
• ,
? .53
,
. ,
,
.
( . 13).
,
,
. (Torque
Index),
.5051
,
, .54
,
R2
( 95 %)
(Ilia) / 16,4% 94,0% 63,0% 13,2%
( ) /
,
.
,
, ,
,
, .
.
, ,
. ,
,
.
.18 , , ,
,
. ,
.55
6,
,
. .
,
6 -
. ,
.
.
-
( ,
),56
.
,
II
, . ,
( . ,
Lobbezoo Lavigne,57 Svensson et al.68).
« » ( ).
( ) ,
.
,
« » .
,
.59
1. Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chi
cago, IL: University of Chicago, 1962.
2. Costen JB. A syndrome of ear and sinus symptoms
« » dependent upon disturbed function of the tem
« » poromandibular joint. Ann Odontol 1934;43:1- 15.
, 3. Schwartz L. Pain associated with the temporoman
dibular joint. J Am Dent Assoc 1955;51:394- 397.
, « » « - 4. Laskin DM . Etiology of the pain-dysfunction syn
» drome. J Am Dent Assoc 1969;79:147- 153.
.60'61 5. Cold SI. A psychophysiologic concept of temporo
mandibular joint dysfunction. N Y State Dent J
1975;41:214- 217.
6. Rollmann GB, Gillespie JM . The role of psychosocial
factors in temporomandibular disorders. Curr Rev
Pain 2000;4:71- 81.
37. Landi N, M anfredini D, Tognini F, Romagnoli M , Bos 49. Nitzan DW, Benoliel R, Pleir G, Dolwick F. Pain and
co M . Quantification of the relative risk of multiple dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint. In:
occlusal variables for muscle disorders of the stom- Sharav E, Benoliel R (eds). Orofacial Pain and Head
atognathic system. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:190- ache. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby-Elsevier, 2008:149-
195. 192.
38. Ahn SJ, Kim TW, Nahm DS. Cephalometric keys to 50. Baba K, Haketa T, Sasaki Y, Ohyama T, Clark GT.
internal derangement of temporomandibular joint Association between masseter muscle activity lev
in women with Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod els recorded during sleep and signs and symptoms
Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:486- 494, discussion of temporomandibular disorders in healthy young
494- 495. adults. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:226- 231.
39. Egermark-Eriksson I. M andibular dysfunction in chil 51. Van Seims M K, Lobbezoo F, Visscher CM , Naeije M.
dren and in individuals with dual bite. Swed Dent J Myofascial temporomandibular disorder pain, para
Suppl 1982;10:1- 45. functions and psychological stress. J Oral Rehabil
40. Dibbets JM . Morphological associations between 2008;35:45- 52.
the angle classes. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:111- 118. 52. Manfredini D, Peretta R, Guarda-Nardini L, Ferronato
41. Dibbets JM , van der Weele LT. Signs and symp G. Role of clinically diagnosed bruxism and occlu
toms of temporomandibular disorders (TM D) and sion in TM J pain: a logistic regression model. J Cran
craniofacial form. Am J Ortho Dentofacial Orthop iomandibular Pract 2010 (in press).
1996;110:73- 78. 53. Ferrario VF, Tartaglia GM , Galletta A, Grassi GP,
42. Okeson JP. M anagement of Temporomandibu Sforza C. The influence of occlusion on jaw and
lar Disorders and Occlusion, ed 6. St Louis, M O: neck muscle activity: a surface EM G study in healthy
Elsevier-Mosby, 2008. young adults. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:341- 348.
43. Thilander B, Rubio G, Pena L, de M ayorga C. Preva 54. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Colombo A, Ciusa V. An elec
lence of temporomandibular dysfunction and its tromyographic investigation of masticatory muscles
association with malocclusion in children and ado symmetry in normo-occlusion subjects. J Oral Reha
lescents: an epidemiologic study related to speci bil 2000;27:33- 40.
fied stages of dental development. Angle Orthod 55. Nitzan DW. The process of lubrification impairment
2002;72:146- 154. and its involvement in temporomandibular joint disc
44. Pahkala R, Qvarnstrom M . Can temporomandibu displacement: a theoretical concept. J Oral M axil
lar dysfunction signs be predicted by early mor lofac Surg 2001;59:36- 45.
phological or functional variables? Eur J Orthod 56. Manfredini D, Lobbezoo F. Role of psychosocial
2004;26:367- 373. factors in the etiology of bruxism. J Orofac Pain
45. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr, Colombo A. Sim 2009;23:153- 166.
plified cephalometric lines for the estimation of 57. Lobbezoo F, Lavigne GJ. Do bruxism and temporo
muscular lines of action. Int J Adult Orthodont mandibular disorders have a cause-and-effect rela
Orthognath Surg 1999;14:47- 54. tionship? J Orofac Pain 1997;11:15- 23.
46. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Sartori M , Ciusa V. The 58. Svensson P, Jadidi F, Arima T, Baad-Hansen L, Ses
mechanical advantage of the masseter muscle in sle BJ. Relationships between craniofacial pain and
subjects with different vertical and sagittal facial bruxism. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:524- 547.
morphology. Clin Orthod Res 1999;2:162- 170. 59. Clark GT. Classification, causation and treatment of
47. Torzilli PA, Deng XH, Ramcharan M . Effect of com masticatory myogenous pain and dysfunction. Oral
pressive strain on cell viability in statically loaded M axillofac Surg Clin North Am 2008;20:145- 157.
articular cartilage. Biomechan Model Mechanobiol 60. Turp JC. Myoarthropathy of the temporomandibu
2006;5:123- 132. lar joint and masticatory muscles. Pain therapy man
48. Peeters EA, Oomens CW, Bouten CV, Bader DL, agement and relaxation instead of aggressive sur
Baaijens FP. M echanical and failure properties of gery. M M W Fortschr Med 2003;145:33- 35.
single attached cells under compression. J Biomech 61. De Laat A. Arthrogenous and myogenous pain.
2005;38:1685- 1693. Different pathologies, different therapies? Zurich:
EACD Annual Meeting, 2008.
, ,
, . . ,
. . 9-1
- ,
. ,
.
, ,
-
, ( )
.1 .
( . 9-1). .
:
. 9-1.
9-1. . ,
( )
( )
(%) .
100 %,
(%) ,
.
100 %,
(
) ( )
:
,23
PubM ed,
26 2008 ., .
7000 , ,
. .
, , ,
, : 1)
, ( ) ; 2)
( .
)
( ), ,
0,5 % ( . 9-2). . ,
9-2. ,
(
)
-
(26 2008 .) ( ).4
.
7761
818 .5
/ 278 ,
18
12
, .14
,
-
(American Academy of Orofacial ,
Pain),7
(European
Academ y of Craniomandibular Disorders),8 (
, -
,9-12 )
, , -
( ),1516
,13
- . .17
,
/ ( )
.18
.
, ,
, ,1920
. , .2122 ,
,
. , .23 ,
,
,
.
.
,
,
,
,
.24
. ,
( ) ,
,
,
.25 ,30
,
. .
,
,
.26
,
,
. ,
12. .31
, ,
, , , ( . 11).
,
. ,
,
,
-
.27 .3233 ,
, .34
,
, ,
, .35
,
.28
( )
,
,
( . 3 21 ).36
.1429 ,
,
,
, / ( II),
.
( . 13).
,%
, ( )
, % ( )
%
0,18- 1,00 8-39-40-45 0,68- 0,864144^ 6
0,51- 0,8418
0,40- 0,8718
- .
: Wenneberg 1983;45 Fricton Schiffman 1986;al Paesani .,
1992;42 Goulet ., 1998;44Yatani ., 19 8;17Yatani ., 1998;43 Orsini ., 1999;15 Manfredini
., 2003;20John ., 2005;18 Leher ., 2005;39 Schmitter ., 2005;46 List ., 2006;40 Manfredini
Guarda-Nardini, 2008.16
10.
,
,
, , .
.
,
.37
,
-
, -
,
( . 9-3).38 .47
,
, ( ) ,
.3940 ,
, , -
9-1. , .
,
,
.48
-
, . ,
,
.
( 9-1). ,
14-19.
, , ,
,
,
.
. , ,
. 9-2.
,
:
,
:
. 9-2.
24. Tasaki , Westesson P-L. Temporomandibular 38. Schmitter M , Kress B, Leckel M , Henschel V, Ohl-
joint: diagnostic accuracy with sagittal and coronal mann B, Rammelsberg P. Validity of temporoman
M R imaging. Radiology 1993;186:723- 729. dibular disorder examination procedures for as
25. Westesson P-L. Reliability and validity of imaging sessment of temporomandibular joint status. Am J
diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders. Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008;133:796- 803.
Adv Dent Res 1993;7:137- 151. 39. Leher A, Graf K, PhoDuc JM , Rammelsberg P. Is
26. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L. Ultrasonography there a difference in the reliable measurement of
of the temporomandibular joint: a literature review. temporomandibular disorder signs between experi
Int J Oral M axillofac Surg 2009;38:1229- 1236. enced and inexperienced examiners? J Orofac Pain
27. Farella M , Michelotti A, Steenks M H, Romeo R. The 2005;18:58- 64.
diagnostic value of pressure algometry in myofascial 40. List T, John MT, Dworkin SF, Svensson P. Recalibra
pain of jaw muscles. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:9- 14. tion improves inter-examiner reliability of TM D ex
28. Gonzalez YM , Greene CS, Mohl ND. Technologi amination. Acta Odontol Scand 2006;64:146- 152.
cal devices in the diagnosis of temporomandibu 41. Fricton JR, Schiffman EL. Reliability of a cranioman
lar disorders. Oral M axillofac Surg Clin North Am dibular index. J Dent Res 1986;65:1359- 1364.
2008;20:211- 220. 42. Paesani D, Westesson P-L, Hatala MP, Tallents RH,
29. Mohl ND. Reliability and validity of diagnostic mo Brooks SL. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis for TM J in
dalities for temporomandibular disorders. Adv Dent ternal derangement and arthrosis. Oral Surg Oral
Res 1993;7:113- 119. Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:360- 363.
30. Schiffmann E, Fricton JR, Harley D, Shapiro BL. The 43. Yatani H, Suzuki K, Kuboki T, M atsuka Y, M aekawa
prevalence and treatment needs of subjects with K, Yamashita A. The validity of clinical examination
temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc for diagnosing anterior disk displacement with re
1990;120:295- 304. duction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra
31. Dworkin SF. Perspectives on the interaction of bio diol Endod 1998;85:647- 653.
logical, psychological and social factors in TM D. 44. Goulet JP, Clark GT, Flack VF, Liu C. The reproduc
J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:856- 863. ibility of muscle and joint tenderness detection
32. Dworkin SF, Von Korff M , LeResche L. Multiple pains methods and maximum mandibular movement
and psychiatric disturbance: an epidemiologic inves measurement for the temporomandibular system.
tigation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:239-244. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:17- 26.
33. Gatchel RJ, Garofalo J, Ellis E, Holt C. Major psycho 45. Kopp S, Wenneberg B. Intra- and interobserver vari
logical disorders in acute and chronic TM D: an initial a b ly in the assessment of signs of disorder in the
examination. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1365-1374. stomatognathic system. Swed Dent J 1983;7:239-
34. Rudy , Turk DC, Kubinski JA, Zaki HS. Differential 246.
treatment response of TM D patients as a function of 46. Schmitter M , ohlmann B, John M T, Hirsch C,
psychological characteristics. Pain 1995;61:103-112. Rammelsberg P. Research diagnostic criteria for
35. Epker JT, Gatchel RJ, Ellis E. An accurate model for temporomandibular disorders: a calibration and
predicting TM D chronicity: practical applications in reliability study. J Craniomandib Pract 2005;23:
clinical settings. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1470- 212- 218.
1475. 47. Okeson JP. Bell's Orofacial Pain, ed 5. Chicago, IL:
36. Gatchel RJ, Stowell AW, Wildenstein L, Riggs R, Ellis Quintessence Publishing, 2005.
E. Efficacy of an early intervention for patients with 48. Klasser GD, Greene CS. The changing field of t em
acute TMD-related pain: a one-year outcome study. poromandibular disorders: what dentists need to
J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:339- 347. know. J Can Dent Assoc 2009;75:49- 53.
37. Moses AJ. Book review: TM Ds: an evidence-based
approach to diagnosis and treatment. J Cranioman
dib Pract 2007;25:5- 7.
М арк Шмиттер
. ,
. ,
, .
-
( ).
,1 15 %
, .
. ,
,
, , .
-
.
,
. ,
.
« -
» ( )
-
( )
, .
,2 .
( )
. ( )
, -
( )
,
( . 10-1). .
,
,
,
(. . ).6-8
.
.
.3
( , ( . 10-1 ),
. .).
, ( . 10-1 ).
, ,
.4
, ,
.
.5 ,
« » « ».
( , ) ,
,
, -
. ,
.
. ,
, :
, -
. . , ,
. ,
( )
. . 10-2
.
,
,
, .
,
.
. ,
,
.
40
. ,
.
.
,
, ,
, ,
,
. 10-3.
. ( . 10-4
).
. , ,
,
. , ,
.12
,
,
,13-15
, .
, . ,
,
.14
,
.
, ,5
13.
( . 10-5),
.4'16 ,
, ( . 10-6)
,1718
.
9 .
10
,
.11
,
. ,
,
. ( . 10-7
10-8).
,
. 10-4 -10-4 .
. 10-5. . 10-6.
( . 10-9)
. ,
, .
,
,
.20
.
.
.3
,
.
, .24
,
( ) . ,
. .
,
,21"23
, ,
. , ,
( . 10-10).
« » «
» .
,
.
.
:
( ) ;
:
.
( ) .
( ).
,2126
,
. 20
26 .
.
.30'31
, ,
,
,27'28 ,
, .32'33
.
,
.
,
, ,
( )
,
.29 . ,
,
. Bell,34
,
. 10-12.
,
( ,
).
,
,
,
.35 , . .
( . 10-11 10-12).
,3940
,
, .
, .36 ,
24. .4142
,
,
.
(
) ,37'38
, (
. )
,
-
. ,
,
. 1992 .
.
-
(Helkimo) ( / ).3
,
1970- .44 /
.
/
/ 46-48
, .16'22-40'49'50
/
. , ,
.
.
.46 / ,
. I
, II -
.
( ,
.
)
,
-
. / .
,
.
. , .
-
, ,
,
.
.
.
• I: ,
III,
,
. ,
40
. .
/
20 .
(
).
• II:
- :
, -
, .
. , ,
-
: .
.
35 .
.
- ,
: .
, / .
,
« » ,
( , ,
, , , ,
) ,
( , , ,
, , ,
) , -
.1 ( )( . 11-1).
,
-
( ).2 1950- . ,
.
(Schwartz), (Lupton)
, ,
.3
,
.
, ,
.
( )
.7
Rollmann Gillespie,4 M anfredini
.,5 Suvinen .6
,
.
, 20 ,
20 20
( ) .
So cial Read just m ent Rating Scale (SRRS); Life Even t s Assessm en t ;
Sexu al/ Ph ysical Ab use Hist o ry Quest io nnaire
Ham ilton Rating Scale fo r Dep ressio n (HRSD); Beck Dep ressio n Invent o ry
(BDI); Zung 's Self- rat ing Dep ressio n Scale
Sp ielb erg er St at e- Trait An xiet y Invent o ry (STAI); Ham ilton Rating Scale
fo r An xiet y (HRSA)
Visual Analo g Scale (VAS); M cGill Pain Quest io nnaire (M PQ); M ult id im en
sio nal Pain Invent o ry (M PI)
M inneso t a M ult ip hasic Perso n alit y Invent o ry (M M PI); Sym p t o m Checklist
90-R (SCL- 90- R)
St ruct ured Clinical In t erview fo r DSM (SCID)
,
,
( ) ,
.8
, ,
, -
.8 .12'13
,
Jo nes .,
. ,
,
.
( ) . -
, .14-16
,
.9 ,
,
.17
.18
,
-
.1011 .1920 ,
-
- .21
,
,
.
.22-24
11-2. 25
11-4. 25
.32-34
« » ,
,
.35 .41
,
, -
- .42
.36-37 ,
,
.3839 SCL-90-R (Symptom Checklist,
SCL-90-R).
SCL-90-R
,
,
.43
,
,34 - -
II
, , ( / ).44'45
.2833 , SCL-90-R
90 , 83
, : (somatization, SOM );
. -
- (obsessiveness- com pulsiveness, - );
(interpersonal
sensitivity, -S); (depression,
, DEP); (anxiety, AN X); (hostility,
, , HOS); (phobic anxiety, PHOB);
, (paranoid
-90-R (SCL-90-R)
12
- 10
13
, 10
, 6
7
6
10
,
56-69 % .4849
.34'42'46'47 ,
,
,
, , , .
. « » « »
.
,
.49
,
110 , .
: (52 %);
(12 %); (11 %); , ,
(24 %).50
67-68
.69
:
(46 %); 21.
(22 %);
(32 %)} ,
/ .
,2-48 /
10.
,51
, 1 ,
.
.52
: II /
Turk, Rudy
,
.
, .70-71
. ,72
,
.2
( , 1992 .
), , ( )
,
,
( . 11-6). , .44
- :
. (Graded Chronic Pain Scale, GCPS),
, SCL-90-R,
, (Jaw Disability Checklist).
,
,
Winocur, 298 / II 45 61
200953
Reissm ann, 225 / 44,7; + 62; MP + TM JP
200833 II TM JP 47,4; TM JP 66,7; TM JP 49
52,8
Lee, 2008 87 / II 42 59,7
M ongini, 532 DSM -IV 22,3; TM JP
200755 15,7
./ 5 , II / SCL-90-R,
( + ).
* , .
’’ .
*"* .
- ', SCL-90-R - 90-R (Sym ptom Checklist-90-R); DSM -IV - ,
;
4- . (Diagnostic and St atistic M anual of M ental Disorders ed 4); MPI - (M ultidim ensional Pain Inventory); M MPI - -
(M innesota M ultiphasic Personality Inventory); HDRS - (Hamilton Depression Rating
II
Scale); M OODS-SR - (Mood Sp ectrum - Self Report); M PQ - - (M cGill Pain Questionnaire);
SCL- 25DS - (Sym ptom Checklist Depression Subscale); IBQ - (Illness Behaviour
19 9
/
I / .
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
11-7. (GCPS)
0 10
(0 - , 10 -
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
)?
-
6 0 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(0 - , 10 -
)?
6 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10 (0 - , 10 -
)?
6
(
)
?
6
0 10 (0 - ,
10 -
)? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6
0 10 (0 - ,
10 - )? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(
) 6
0 10 (0 - -
, 10 - )? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11-8. (GCPS)
( )
: : 0- 29: 0
30- 49: 1
+ X 10
50- 69: 2
70 +: 3
0- 6 : 0
7- 14 : 1
15- 30 : 2
31 + :3
11-9. GCPS
0 6
I, <50 3
II, >50 3
III, 3- 4 ,
IV, 5- 6 ,
90-R
90-R (SCL-90-R)
/ . Derogatis .43
/
GCPS Von Korff .7374 ,
.
II 31 ,
, (b, , h, , k, I, m, n, v, y, cc,
. GCPS dd, ) ,
, 10-
, - ( *, , d*, j* , *,
*, f, a, w, ).
( . 11-7). , «
» .
. ,
.
,
-
( ) 0 1 2 3 4
( ) 0 1 2 3 4
( ) 0 1 2 3 4
(d) 0 1 2 3 4
( ) 0 1 2 3 4
(f) 0 1 2 3 4
(g) 0 1 2 3 4
(h) 0 1 2 3 4
() , 0 1 2 3 4
(j) 0 1 2 3 4
(k) 0 1 2 3 4
(I) 0 1 2 3 4
(m) 0 1 2 3 4
(n) , 0 1 2 3 4
(o) 0 1 2 3 4
(P) 0 1 2 3 4
(q) 0 1 2 3 4
(r) 0 1 2 3 4
(S) 0 1 2 3 4
(t) 0 1 2 3 4
<u) 0 1 2 3 4
(v) 0 1 2 3 4
(w) 0 1 2 3 4
(x) 0 1 2 3 4
( ) 0 1 2 3 4
(z) 0 1 2 3 4
(aa) 0 1 2 3 4
(bb) 0 1 2 3 4
(cc) 0 1 2 3 4
-
(dd) 0 1 2 3 4
(ff) 0 1 2 3 4
0 1
0 1 ,
0 1
0 1
0 1
. Ohrbach
/ 0 1
.75
0 1
0 1
(M andibular
0 1
Functional Impairment Questionnaire, MFIQ),
0 1
,
0 1
0 1
( ,
,
,
,42 ,34 ,46 64 ),
,33
. , (Jaw Functional Limitation Scale,
JFLS), ,
SCL-90-R
,
.45
, .
,
,
. ,
,
. ,
,
,
,
,
II / . .
II /
, ,
/ , ,
, ,
-
( ). 1992 . .
( / ), .5
Fryback Thornbury5
.
1. .
, - .
( ), 2. . ,
, ,
,
,
.1 , Wiese ,
.2 (receiver operating
characteristic, ROC) ( . 12-1).
( 3. .
/ ) ,
. Koh .3 . .
.
4. .
-
( )
. .
Limchaichana .,4 5.
, , .
/ .
. 6. .
.
12-1. 12-2.
( , ) . .
-
. :
• ( ),
. - ( )
• :
,
. • - ( )
• :
,
. :
• : •
,
. •
• :
, •
.
• : , - :
:
. : •
/
( -
). •
• : , :
. •
:
/(
+ •
).
• :
: •
. •
: .
/(
+
).
,
•
:
,
.
: .
/(
+
).
,
• ,
0 1( 0 100 %), .
1
,
0,5 . .
,
( 12-2).
1.
. - ,
. ,
2. , ,
.
. .67 Dahlstrom
3. . . Lind vall,8
4.
. ,
:
, , ,
. .
5. ,
,
, .910
M agnusson Karlsson,11
.
.
,
: . Epstein .12
,
, ,
( ),
- ,
( ). - . ,
.
,
. , .12
,
. 12-1. .
, b .
.
,
,
. 12-2.
24
( . 12-1).
,
,
( . 12-2). .
, -
, .
, , Flygare .,23
.17
0,58 0,53,
, - 0,89 0,95,
. ,
.18 .23 ,
,
. .
. 12-3
12-4, . Wiese
.,24 ,
.
.
,
.
.2 ,24
. , ,
, . ,
.
, .
,
,
.1920 Eckerdal21 , -
. 12-3. . 12-4.
, .
, .
,
( . 12-5) .
( . 12-6). , Westesson
.,27
, 0,75 1,00, ,
,
. 1,0 0,78, . ,
, .27
Hussain .
,28
,
.
,
( . 12-7 12-8).
.
,
.25 Hintze
.26
,
. ,
. 12-6. .
. . .
.
. 12-7.
.
.
1 : - ;
- ;
-
. 12-8.
.
.
. : .
1 :
- ;
- ; -
. 12-9.
.
( )
. .3031
,
( . 12-10).
( . 12-9).
,
Westesson .32
,
1970- - 1980- . ,
( . 12-11).
. 12-11. -
,34
-
.33
,
.
Lim chaichana .35
,
- -
.
,
,
. Tasaki .37
,
8
, ,
.
. 12-12. (
)
. .
.
( 12 ),
( )
( . 12-12).
1,5 .
, ( . 12-13).
. Tasaki .37
, ,
1- , ,
2- ,
,
( ) .
. Wang .36
.38
, Orsini .39
.
. ,
Lim chaichana .35 (
12 11 ),
. . ,
, ,
,
.
. . 12-14
-
.36
Takano .,40 7
,
. ,
.41
Westesson .27
. 12-14.
.
.
0,86, - 0,63,
( 12 ),
,
- 0,67
0,83, .
,
.
. Schm itter .42
Lim chaichana .,35
(
) ,
. . ,
-
. 12-15. 65
.
,
. .
. .
.
. . (
)
.
. , d. ,
2- . , . ( )
.
, 2- , f.
44. . ( )
. ,
, . ,
.35
, ,
.40
( . 12-16)
, ( . 12-15),43'44
, Larheim .,44 ,
,
,
0,54
0,79, .44 ,
.47 , White
. .,48
, , .
,
.
,
. ,
, 12-2.
•
. ,
.
• .3 ,
.
•
. ,
.
,
.
.
,
. Rudisch .49
.
,45'46
. 12-17. . 12-18. 56 ,
. 2 . .
( . .
- , (
. - (Jean- Paul Go ulet ),
- , , )
,
)
( )
. , ,
, .
.
0,73, - 0,75,
,53
- 0,89 ,
0,50, .
,
. M elis .54
.,50
51,5 100 %. ,
.
(73 %), ( )
.61
, .
79 % ( 0,85,
0,67).52 . 12-17 -
, -99 ,
. , , -
,
. 1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria
for temporomandibular d isor d er s: review, criteria,
,
examinations and specifications, critique. J Crani
omandib Disord 1992;6:301- 355.
. 2. Wiese M , Svensson P, Bakke M , List T, Hintze H,
Petersson A et al. Association between temporo
mandibular joint symptoms, signs, and clinical
diagnosis using the RDC/ TM D and radiographic
findings in temporomandibular joint tomograms. J
Orofac Pain 2008;22:239- 251.
3. Koh KJ, List T, Petersson A, Rohlin M . Relationship
between clinical and magnetic resonance imaging
diagnoses and findings in degenerative and inflam
matory temporomandibular joint diseases. A sys
tematic review. J Orofac Pain 2009;23:122- 139.
4. Limchaichana N, Nilsson H, Ekberg EC, Nilner M ,
, .
Petersson A. Clinical diagnoses and MRI find
, ings in patients with TM D pain. J Oral Rehabil
2007;34:237- 245.
5. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnos
tic imaging. Med Decis M aking 1991;11:88- 94.
. ,
6. M awani F, Lam EW, C, M cKee I, Raboud DW,
M ajor PW. Condylar shape analysis using panoram
ic radiography units and conventional tomography.
. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
2005;99:341- 348.
7. Schmitter M , Gabbert O, Ohlmann B, Plassel A,
, Wolff D, Rammelsberg P et al. Assessment of the
reliability and validity of panoramic imaging for as
. sessment of mandibular condyle morphology using
both M RI and clinical examination as the gold stan
dard. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod 2006;102:220- 224.
8. Dahlstrom L, Lindvall AM . Assessment of temporo 23. Flygare L, Rohlin M, Akerman S. Microscopy and to
mandibular joint disease by panoramic radiography: mography of erosive changes in the temporomandib
reliability and validity in relation to tomography. ular joint. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:297-303.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:197- 201. 24. Wiese M , Wenzel A, Hintze H, Petersson A, Knuts-
9. Brooks SL, Westesson P-L, Eriksson L, Hansson LG, son , Bakke M et al. Osseous changes and condyle
Barsotti JB. Prevalence of osseous changes in the position in TM J tomograms: impact of RDC/ TM D
temporomandibular joint of asymptomatic persons clinical diagnoses on agreement between expected
without internal derangements. Oral Surg Oral Med and actual findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Pathol 1992;73:118- 122. Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:52- 63.
10. Crow HC, Parks E, Campbell JH, Stucki DS, Daggy 25. Loubele M , Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R,
J. The utility of panoramic radiography in temporo Vanheusden S, Suetens P et al. Comparison be
mandibular joint assessment. Dentomaxillofac Ra tween effective radiation dose of CBCT and M SCT
diol 2005;34:91- 95. scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J
11. Magnusson T, Karlsson C. Clinical impact of ra Radiol 2008;71:461- 468.
diological examinations of patients with suspect 26. Hintze H, Wiese M , Wenzel A. Cone beam CT and
ed temporomandibular disorders. Swed Dent J conventional tomography for the detection of mor
2002;26:67- 74. phological temporomandibular joint changes. Den
12. Epstein JB, Caldwell J, Black G. The utility of pan tomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:192- 197.
oramic imaging of the temporomandibular joint in 27. Westesson P-L, Katzberg RW, Tallents RH, Sanchez-
patients with temporomandibular disorders. Oral Woodworth RE, Svensson A. CT and M R of the
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod temporomandibular joint: comparison with autopsy
2001;92:236- 239. specimens. Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:1165-1171.
13. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 28. Hussain AM , Packota G, M ajor PW, Flores-Mir C.
At: http:/ / www.icrp.org (accessed 25 March 2009). Role of different imaging modalities in assessment
14. Omnell -A, Petersson A. Radiography of the of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteo
temporomandibular joint utilizing oblique lat phytes: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol
eral transcranial projections. Odontol Revy 2008;37:63- 71.
1976;27:77- 92. 29. Wilkes CH. Arthrography of the temporomandibu
15. Pullinger AG, Hollender L, Solberg WK, Petersson lar joint in patients with the TM J pain-dysfunction
A. A tomographic study of mandibular condyle syndrome. Minn Med 1978;61:645- 652.
position in an asymptomatic population. J Prosthet 30. Farrar WB. Characteristics of the condylar path in
Dent 1985;53:706- 713. internal derangements of the TM J. J Prosteth Dent
16. Blaschke DD, Blaschke TJ. Normal TM J bony 1978;39:319- 323.
relationships in centric occlusion. J Dent Res 31. M cCarthy Jr W L, Farrar WB. Surgery for internal
1981;60:98- 104. derangements of the temporomandibular joint.
17. Kurita H, Ohtsuka A, Kobayashi H, Kurashina K. A J Prosteth Dent 1979;42:191- 196.
study of the relationship between the position of 32. Westesson P-L, Omnell -A, Rohlin M . Double
the condylar head and displacement of the tem contrast tomography of the temporomandibular
poromandibular joint disk. Dentomaxillofac Radiol joint: a new technique based on autopsy specimen
2001;30:162- 165. examination. Acta Radiol Diagn 1980;21:777- 784.
18. McNeill C (ed). Craniomandibular Disorders: Guide 33. Westesson P-L, Rohlin M . Diagnostic accuracy of
lines for Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management. double-contrast arthrotomography of the temporo
Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 1990. mandibular joint: correlation with postmortem mor
19. Rosenberg HM , Grazyk RJ. Temporomandibular ar phology. Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:655- 660.
ticulation tomography: a corrected anteroposterior 34. Liedberg J, Panmekiate S, Petersson A, Rohlin M.
and lateral cephalometric technique. Oral Surg Oral Evidence-based evaluation of three imaging meth
Med Oral Pathol 1986;62:198- 204. ods for the temporomandibular disc. Dentomaxil
20. Heffez L, Jordan S, Rosenberg H, Miescke K. Ac lofac Radiol 1996;25:234- 241.
curacy of temporomandibular joint space measure 35. Limchaichana N, Petersson A, Rohlin M . The effica
ments using corrected hypocycloidal tomography. cy of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis
J Oral M axillofac Surg 1987;45:137- 142. of degenerative and inflammatory temporomandib
21. Eckerdal O. Tomography of the temporomandibular ular joint disorders: a systematic literature review.
joint: correlation between tomographic image and Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
histologic sections in a three-dimensional system. 2006;102:521- 536.
Acta Radiol 1973;329:1- 107.
22. Cholitgul W, Petersson A, Rohlin M , Tanimoto K,
Akerman S. Diagnostic outcome and observer
performance in sagittal tomography of the tem
poromandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol
1990;19:1- 6.
,
- .
( ) -
( ) ,
,
, ,
.
,
, .
,
,
( ),
,
,
.
. ,
.
,
. ,
. ,
, -
,
.1 .
, ,
, -
( ), ,
-
( = 10), : 0,55-0,93
,
,2
,
. ,
«
=;
,
,
.
,
- - ,
,
.
*
S
,
0 S
—^ 0 .3
^ S
о. 5g i f
S m
"^ X t l m CO
5 =
0 CD^ S5 Ef
I 0
_Q I- I-
1= I
.
X
'
о 21
. C
D
. -- 0
- * =- g ,
II" i -s X II 5 8 ° ”
CL
•5 1 3 £® S T .
О СО 5 0-
* j? 2 I s
Q Q >• £ X > 1— CO
1 00 £ 0
« о о2 е5 0 I I
g 2
c
“ ><
CD
X
; —
0
.
- S 5 - )
^ |Г .8 1 5
m ^ О s II §
g S
I ,03 CD Ш -О 0 - 0 0 CD -S X ,
СО Г J I- VO S * m 0 S
* S S 0 t -О 2
-
^ J
_ —
-О LO X - ^ — 0 —) s0
) _
5.
>. m
*
.
£ 3 X 3 см X
•W -
0
J ^
0
; II
0 2 2 MS
,
СО I I- '
- I .S 2
•& J s Q- 0 .^ 0
S 1 | | ,
III
s - X
5
^s S ° X
0 (D , ,
2 Q. ; I . 8 LQ
, . . ,
-
I о
0 S
s s
(D 0
S
Q) 0
S о
0 s
s s
-Г о
5 О S = % S s :
§ 5 5 --g f 5 6
f 1 - - . . . •§• * a£ -& Q. .
о о. •
m X * m *
0
^ 2 *: *
s
[= ^ 2
O 0
^ 2 ^ * =
о. .
о I-
-
°-
-
°-
°
5-
О о
со
00
)
,
. -
( )
( )
. ( . 13-2).4'10' 4_20
. ,
.410
:
( ) .
.
. ,
.
0,67 0,87
, . 0,77 0,87
, , .19
. ,
- .
, .
,
,
. ,
( . 13-1 ( 7
.5
,
.
,4'8-14
.
.10
,
. (American Dental Association)
,
.21 ,
.12
(
) .
, ,
, , .33
.22 ,
, .33
,
.23'24
.33
, ,
. ,
.
,
, ( )
-
. .3435
,
. ,
14 %.25
, (
) ,
24 , -
.36
18 %. ( )
-
31-38 %.25 ,
37
Klasser Okeson,38 Lund
. , .,39 Widmer .,2 Suvinen
, Kem ppainen,40
. 13-3. , , ,
26-33 , ,
, ,
.27'29-30'32-33 , ,
, .
,
,
. ,
, , ,
, ,
,
. ,
.
,
, , (17 %
, 47 % ).41
(n)
)
Schroeder, 199132 ( ) ( = 30), ( ) (s/ min) : ( ) = 8,4, ( ) = 1,3 ( .)
( = 25) ( - ( < 0,05), ( ) > ( )
)
Bodere, 200533 ( ) (mV) : ( ) = 55, ( ) = 25
( = 33), ( ) ( = 32), , ANOVA (Ps 0,05) ( ) < (b)
231
( ) . :( ) = 42,
( = 9), = 42 ( )( ,
.)
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
-
,
: .
15-40 %.31
, ,
,
75 % , . Dworkin
.,42
.
, ( 0,62
0,61, ). ,
.
,
( 0,30
, 0,44, ).
Dworkin .43
.
. ,
,21 50 %
. ,
,
. ,
. , Goulet Clark,6
(
)
90 %. ,
, ,
,
. .
,
,
.44"61 ,
.
,52
( )
. ,52
.
, .
25-50 % .5354
.
.
0,49
.56 , ,
.45
,
.
.
-
.
.56
,
.
, ,
.
( ),
,
.
,5758 ,
.
.
, .
. -
.
.
,
. Goulet .,12
Dworkin .,42
( )
(0,78-0,93 0,90-0,98,
),
( ). ,
,
.
.
, , ,
.
, .50'59-63 ,
, ,
, ,
,
.
(
, ), ,
.
, -
. ,
,
, . ,
. ,
,
. .
, ,
. (M ylar). ,
,
.
,
.
, ,
,
52. Wabeke , Spruijt RJ, van der Weyden KJ, Naeije 62. Arakawa Y, Yamaguchi H. Chewing movements in
M . Evaluation of a technique for recording TM joint near ideal occlusion with and without TM symp
sounds. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:676- 682. toms. J Craniomandibular Pract 1997;15:208- 220.
53. Gross A, Gale EN. A prevalence study of the clinical 63. Stohler CS, Ashton-M iller JA, Carlson DS. The ef
signs associated with mandibular dysfunction. J Am fects of pain from the mandibular joint and muscles
Dent Assoc 1983;107:932- 936. on masticatory motor behaviour in man. Arch Oral
54. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L, von Korff M , Biol 1988;33:175- 182.
Howard J, Truelove E et al. Epidemiology of signs 64. Watt DM . Recording the sounds of tooth contact: a
and symptoms in TM disorders: clinical signs in cases diagnostic technique for evaluation of occlusal dis
and controls. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:273- 281. turbance. Int DentJ 1969;19:221- 238.
55. Puri P, Kambylafkas P, Kyrkanides S, Katzberg R, 65. Kifune R, Honma S, . The development of
Tallents RH. Comparison of doppler sonography a new occlusal sound checker. Nippon Shishubyo
to magnetic resonance imaging and clinical ex Gakkai Kaishi 1985;27:482- 491.
amination for disc displacement. Angle Orthod 66. Maness W L, Benjamin M , Podoloff R, Bobick A.
2006;76:824- 829. Computerized occlusal analysis: a new technology.
56. Gale E, Gross A. An evaluation of TM joint sounds. Quintessence Int 1987;18:287- 292.
J Am Dent Assoc 1985;111:62- 63. 67. Moini M R, Neff PA. Reproducibility of occlusal con
57. Kernohan WG, Beverland DE, M cCoy GF, Hamilton tacts utilizing a computerized instrument. Quintes
A, Watson P, Mollan R. Vibration arthrometry: a sence Int 1991;22:357- 360.
preview. Acta Orthop Scand 1990;61:70- 79. 68. Mizui M , Nabeshima F, Tosa J, Tanaka M , Kawa-
58. Jiang CC, Liu YJ, Yip KM , Fu SE, Su JL. Vibration zoe T. Quantitative analysis of occlusal balance in
arthrometry of the knee with torn meniscus: a intercuspal position using the -Scan system. Int J
preliminary report. J Formos Med Assoc 1994; 93: Prosthodont 1994;7:62- 71.
622- 625. 69. Hattori Y, Okugawa H, Watanabe M . Occlusal force
59. Nielsen IL, Marcel T, Chun D, M iller AJ. Patterns measurement using dental prescale. J Jpn Prost
of mandibular movements in subjects with crani hodont Soc 1994;38:835- 841.
omandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63: 70. Araki A, Ito H, Mukaida Y, Sotoyama M . Clinical
202- 217. application of new occlusal evaluation system (Den
60. Clark GT, Lynn P. Horizontal plane jaw movements tal Prescale OCCLUZER). Shikaitenbou (Japanese)
in controls and clinic patients with TM dysfunction. 1994;84:7- 19.
J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:730- 735.
61. Ozaki Y, Shigematsu T, Takahashi S. Analysis of the
chewing movement in TM disorders. Bull Tokyo
Dent Coll 1990;31:91- 103.
.
-
( )
. 10 %
- .
, « » .5
,
.
, .36-9 ,
,
, .6
( / ).1
I ,
, .2 ,
, II
, , .10
,
,”
.
. ,
.1213
. ,
, 10-20 %
.2-4 ,
20-40 .2 ,68 .3'9'1415
.
35-
,
, ,
, .14
,
. « »
.30
,
, 3 .
, 4
. 11
, 18 ,
( . 14-1).30
.16 , ,
.
.16-19 ,
,
.
.20 , , , ,
( ) ,
.
,
.21 , ,
, ,
,
,
.22-27 , .31
- ,
- .28 , ,
,
. , .32
,
.30 « »
3
11 18
.
:
1) (
):
5- 7
2) (
): -
3) ( ):
4} (
):
5) ( ):
6) ( ): 2
7) ( ):
8) (
):
9) :
,
, ,
,
. ,
,
.33 ,
,3940
,
, .
.34-38
,
,
0,5-5 % ,
. , ,
.
. ,
, (9 : 1), ,
.
, . ,
65 %
, .39
45-60 .3039 ,
.
.
,
( . 14-1 ).43-50 ,
, 53-94 % .49 ,
39 60
.43-45'47-49 /
, 41 % .43
, ,
29 % - , 71 % - 18 % ,
, .47'48 75 %
, (
).
(
).46
( ,
, . .),
.9 , .
30
, - 30 ,
, , 87 %
.46
, 10 %
.47
. ,
,
, .
, Salvetti .48
, ,
, , ,
,61 93 %
( )
Hedenberg- 46 48 23
M agnusson, (3 , / 23 .
199744 43 )
,
88 )
• 1
•• @dentistinfo
30 первый стоматологический телеграм канал
/ .
, ,
, ,
, .
181 , . ,
, 74
(80 %) .
- (
/ ). ,
,
.
,
.
,
( )
, ,
, ,
, ,
.44
- . Raphael M arbach53
,
63
, .7 , .
,
( ) , ,
.43 .
Hedenberg-M agnusson .45
191 .
6
, 94 % ( ,
). ,
. ,
, .
. ,
, ,
.11'47'48
, , ,
. .
,
, , ,
, .
,
.
.32
.
.
, .
.
.
,
- ,
, , . .54 ,
- , , ,
.6
,
, .
. ,
Adiels .55
.
,
. , .
. ,
,
1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria
for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria,
,
examinations and specifications, critique. J Crani-
. omand Disord 1992;6:301- 355.
, 2. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular dis
orders: implications for the investigation of etiologic
factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:291-305.
3. Rauhala K, Oikarinen KS, Jarvelin M R, Raustia AM .
. Facial pain and temporomandibular disorders: an epi
demiological study of the Northern Finland 1966 birth
cohort. J Craniomandibular Pract 2000;18:40-46.
4. Ahlberg K, Ahlberg J, Kononen M , Alakuijala A,
Partinen M , Savolainen A. Perceived orofacial pain
. , and its associations with reported bruxism and
insomnia symptoms in media personnel with or
without irregular shift work. Acta Odontol Scand
2005;63:213- 217.
, 5. Friction JR. The relationship of temporomandibu
. lar disorders and fibromyalgia: implications for di
agnosis and treatment. Curr Pain Fleadache Rep
15-1.
• - / -
,
•
•
.
•
« - »
•
,
•
.
, 15-2. -
,
, ,
•
,
(IHS, International Headache
( 15-1).
Society, 1988)1
•
.
( / ;
-
Research Diagnostic Criteria for
15-2.
Temporomandibular Disorders, 1992)2
•
,
(IASP, International
,
Association for the Study of Pain, 1994)3
,
•
.
(American Academ y of
Orofacial Pain, AAOP, 2008)4
-
•
, ,
(International
, ,
Classification of Headache Disorders,
,
ICHD, 2- ., 2004)6
, , -
15-3.
-
15-4,
.
• ,
•
• ,
• ( ), ,
• ,
• - . ,
•
• - ,
.
.
,
- .
,
.4'67
, ,
. ,
.
, ,
- .
,
. .
:
, .
,
, ,
, , , -
- ,
. , .3
, -
( )
. ,
. ,
,
: ,
.
,
, ,
, , , .89
- , ,
( 15-3).
15-4. ,
-
:
: • : ( ,
• , , , )
• ( ,
• , )
•
• : (
: ,
• ( , );
, , , ( ,
) )
• ( • : ,
, , , , - (
, ) )
•
• ( :
) • ( ,
• , , , )
• • ( ,
• , , ,
,
• , ,
• , )
•
• ( - :
, , • -
) ( )
( , ,
: )
• , • ( )
• ( , :
, , • (
, , , )
, • (
)
• ( -
) )
• •
( ) - .10
(
)( 15-5).9 : ,
, .”
15-5.
(W o o lf9)
• - , .
,
,
• - .
, ,
• -
.
,
• -
.
-
,
-
.
,
,
.
.
, 10-15 % , 80 %
, 12 % .
6 .12
.
, 10 %
25 %
. .5
,
( 15-6).
60 ,
.5
.13
( ).
,
-
.20
- ,
.
(Jam es
15-6.
( ) :
: (
, . )
:
, • : , ,
.
: • :
• : ( ),
• : , ,
• : ,
• : ,
• :
:
• : • :
• : , • :
, ,
,
: ( ) • :
• : , , ,
• : , (
, ):
• :
• : ,
• :
• : • :
• : ,
( , , ,
) ,
• : ,
,
,
,
, • : -
• : , (
, ), ,
, , ,
, • : ,
• : , , -
, , ,
, , • : ,
, ,
. ( )
• : , , . • :
• : , ,
15-6. ( )
• : , -
( ,
), , • :
, ,
,
• : , , , • :
, , , .
,
• :
, ,
, , , •
, , , .
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
, .
, ,
• : , ,
, • -
- ,
, , • -
( ), , ,
,
,
( )14 13
• : • -
• : ,
15
• - ,
« » ,
. 16'17
. • 18
• - -
, • -
,
• : , ( , (
), ),
, - .19
,
,
• :
, • ( ,
, , )
. • : ,
, ,
( )
. • :
. ,
-
,
, ,
- ,
, , . .
,
32 .21-23 .
10-14 .
,
-
,
,
.
.2'’-26
( ,
, ,
( 15-7), , , -
, , ), ,
, (
, , ),
. -
(
, ).
, , , - -
, (
, )
, ,
.
.
. 16.
.27-29
.
4-72 ,
( ) , - -
- ,
.5
( 15-8). 5-60
( )
,
,
, ,
,
. .3132
40 % 15 %
,
.30 ( 3:1),
,1 100 .33
( )
. .
14 : ,
, ,
, .
,
.6
-
.
, 80 %
.3435
15-8. , 15
- .
•
3% .36
•
( ),
• -
,
•
•
. ,
.5 ,
,
,
, ,37 , ,
.
0,05 %
.3839
( 6:1)
20 ,
,
1-2
15-180 .5'30
, ,
« ». .5
. , ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
,
( - .5
).
, ,
6-12 1-2 . .40
1 ,
, 1 .530 , , ,
( .
) ,
,
(2-30 ) ,
. , .
.5 .
,
,
5-240 .
3 200 .
,
, .
, ,
,
.5 ,
. ,
,
. . ,
,
. ,
.
2% ,
5 , ,
.41 , ,
.41 ( ),
( , ,
) (
. ).
-
,
( ,
)
30 ,42 ,
, ,
.42 , .
-
,
,43
.
, .
, .
.
.44
45
.5 .
.
. ,
,
. .
,
, ,
, , . ,
,
. 40
.4647
.
.
, ,
. , ,
.6'50
, ,
( ,
), - (Tolosa-Hunt) (
,
III, IV VI
.47 )
. ,
,
.
, , I( I) -
, , II
( ) .
, , .
, . .
,
.48'49 ,
.5
. ,
. I
1
,
, , ,
. . II
,
(ICHD-II).5 ,
,
.51
,
, ,
,
. ,
. ,
.47
,
.
(
)
,
.62
.54
(
) -
,
.
.
, .62
,
.53
- (ICHD-II).5'56
.18 ( )
,
( 15-9).
,
5
, .
, ,
. .
15-9.
• :
( • :
):
• : • : , ,
• :
• : , , , 57
• :
( , ,
,
• :
)
• : • :
( , ,
• : ), ,
• : , ,
• :
• : ,
,
( , ):
• , 56 • :
• : ,
,
• : , • :
, ( • :
, - • :
) • :
• :
( ) • : ,
56
• :
( , ( , , ,
, )
): • :
• : ( , ),
, ,
• :
,
• : , , ,
, ,
• :
15-10. 15-11. /
• : I
1
• : a.
, , , , b.
• :
2
• : a.
b.
• :
c.
• :
, 3
, a.
b.
• : c.
( , ,
), II
• : ,
,
• :
, ,
Woda .67
( ),
( . . 15-1).
15-10. « »
,
/ , ,
I , ,
II -
( 15-11 ).66 , .
, , , ,
.
.
, .
,
. ( . 15-2). ,
,
(Woda et al.57)
,
.9
,
,
.
.
. 15-2.
. ,
.58-61 .65-67
-
,
,
.62-64
- .
59. Brousseau , Manzini TN, Lavigne GJ. Understand 64. John MT, Miglioretti DL, LeResche L, Von Korff M,
ing and managing the interaction between sleep Critchlow CW. Widespread pain as a risk factor for
and pain: an update for the dentist. J Can Dent As dysfunctional temporomandibular disorder pain.
soc 2003;69:437- 442. Pain 2003;102:257- 263.
60. Vazquez-Delgado E, Schmidt J, Carlson C, De 65. Dohrenwend B, Raphael K, Marbach J, Gallacher R.
Leeuw R, Okeson JP. Psychological and sleep qual Why is depression co-morbid with chronic myofa
ity differences between chronic daily headache and cial pain? A family study test of alternative hypoth
temporomandibular disorder patients. Cephalalgia eses. Pain 1999;83:183- 192.
2004;24:446- 454. 66. Auerbach SM , Laskin DM , Frantsve M A, Tamara O.
61. Naughton F, Ashworth P, Skevington M . Does sleep Depression, pain, exp o su r e t o stressful life events
quality predict pain-related disability in chronic pain and long-term outcomes in temporomandibular
patients? The mediating roles of depression and disorder patients. J Oral M axillofac Surg 2001 ;59:
pain severity. Pain 2007;127:243- 252. 628- 633.
62. LeResche L, Dworkin SF, Von Korff M . Epidemiol 67. Yap AU, Tan KB, Ch u a EK, Tan H H . Depression and
ogy of temporomandibular disorders: an analysis of somatization in patients with temporomandibular
multiple pain complaints. Pain 1987, Suppl 4. disorders. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:479- 484.
63. Dworkin SF, Von Korff M , LeResche L. Multiple
pains and psychiatric disturbance: an epidemio
logic investigation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:
239- 244.
-
( ),
- « »
. .
, - -
. ( )
, . ,
- .1 .
: ,
• ,23
; ,
• .
- ;
• ,
, ,
. ,
, , : .14-7
• ( )
;
•
; .8-13
• ( )
;
• ( ) ,614-17
.
,
,
.1819
.
,
. , :
,
,
.1819 ( ),
,
- .
:
• , : ( )
- , .
;
• 15
.
;
• 15
. . ,
( )
.
,
,
.
-
.
.
,
.2'3'20"22
Stovner .,2 ,
46 % . - ,
11 % .
, 42 % - -
3 % -
.2 .
(International
Headache Society (IHS)23 ( ,
( ) ), ,
,
.
. .
, ,
. ,
. ,
.
, .
4-72 . .
.
,
.
, .
4-
, ,
(Diagnostic
and Statistical M anual of Mental Disorders .
Fourth Edition, DSM -IV).24 ,
, - ,
,
, .
.
, ,
,
. .
,
,
, ,
.14'26-29 -
, .
.
( .
, ,
). ,
. ,
,
( ) .23
. ,
-
. , 3031
( )
. ,3233
. ,
.32-34
, , ,
® 1.2 . 16-1.
0
1 1.0
I
§ -8 ,
ч
§ 0.6
.
(
95 %).
, . . ( ) , 70,2 %
, . 18,2 %
11,5 % -
, .44
.36
. , 40 %
36
.37 Anttila . , ( . 16-1),
, , ,
,
, .
. , ,
.38 .
.45^17
.
,3940 , ( )
.41^13
, .
Mongini .44 ,
.
44
30 %
.
384 ,
. -
. ,
.
, ,
,
, (
M ongini et al.48)
, , ,
.6
.
,
. , ,47'4950
, .51-53
(44,9 %).
,
.48
.
.
,
, .
.
,
, , ,
,
.28 , ,
.
, , ,
. ,
. , .48
,
.28
,
.12 -
. 16-3. . 16-4. ,
, . 16-3.
, ,
. , ,
.
, 3
.4654 ( . 16-3).
,
.
.
« ,
.44
, ».
28 %
. .
. 16-2.
,
-
( . 16-4).
.
1 I DSM-IV (
,
)
.
. 56 «
,
. ,
,
,
. , ».
-
. 16-7. . 16-8. ,
. 16-7.
( M ongini et al.1) (
M ong ini et al.1)
. 16-9. , . 16-7.
2 ( M ong ini et al.1)
: 400
1 , a 20
, 15 2
. , ,
.144 .
(
. 7 ),
( . 16-5).
. ,
( . 16-6). ,
, ,
.
2 a
10 2 (
27 1 ).
, 15
, ,
. 15 .
2
, .
, ,
( . 16-9).
( ,
7-8 ), .
. .
,
. 3
( . 16-8) 30
.
( . 16-10).
, .
,
,
. « ,
, , ».
, ,
,
.
32 ( . 16-11).
, .
,
, 43
( . 16-12).
,
. ,
,
4 . 10
.
- .
. 28 , ,
, ,
, , - , ,
10 ,
. .
,
. .
, ( . 16-13),
.
.
,
, 33 ( . 16-14).
,
. ,
, .
,
, .
. ,
,
. 1,5 -
, ,
,
.
( ,
.
,
, -
, ,
)
.
.
- - .
,
, ( ) ,
, .
. .
6
,
( . 16-15). ,
, .
,
. ,
,
« »
. ,
,
.
.
30. Jensen R, Rasmussen , Pedersen , Olesen J. 44. Mongini F, Ciccone G, Rota E, Ferrero L, Ugolini A,
Muscle tenderness and pressure pain thresholds in Evangelista A et al. Effectiveness of an educational
headache: a population study. Pain 1993;52:193-199. and physical programme in reducing headache,
31. Lipchik GL, Holroyd KA, Talbot F, Greer M . Peric neck and shoulder pain: a workplace controlled
ranial muscle tenderness and exteroceptive sup trial. Cephalalgia 2008;28:541- 552.
pression of temporalis muscle activity: a blind 45. Allen JD, Rivera-Morales W C, Zwemer JD. The oc
study of chronic tension-type headache. Headache curence of temporomandibular disorder symptoms
1997;37:368- 376. in healthy young adults with and without evidence
32. Jensen R. Mechanisms of spontaneous tension-type of bruxism. Cranio 1990;8:312- 318.
headaches: an analysis of tenderness, pain thresh 46. Parker M W. A dynamic model of etiology in
olds and EM G. Pain 1996;64:251- 256. temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc
33. Jensen R, Rasmussen BK. Muscular disorders in ten 1990;120:283- 290.
sion-type headache. Cephalalgia 1996;16:97- 103. 47. Winocur E, Littner D, Adams I, Gavish A. Oral hab
34. Jensen R, Bendtsen L, Olesen J. M uscular factors its and their association with signs and symptoms of
are of importance in tension-type headache. Head temporomandibular disorders in adolescents: a gen
ache 1998;38:10- 17. der comparison. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
35. Jensen K, Tuxen C, Olesen J. Pericranial muscle tender Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:482^ J87.
ness and pressure-pain threshold in the temporal region 48. Mongini F. Temporomandibular disorders and
during common migraine. Pain 1988;35:65-70. tension-type headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep
36. Vernon H, Steiman I, Hagino C. Cervicogenic dys 2007;11:465- 470.
function in muscle contraction headache and mi 49. Johansson A, Unell L, Carlsson GE, Soderfeldt B,
graine: a descriptive study. J Manipulative Physiol Hailing A. Gender difference in symptoms related
Ther 1992;15:418- 429. to temporomandibular disorders in a population
37. Kidd RF, Nelson R. Musculoskeletal dysfunction of of 50-year-old subjects. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:
the neck in migraine and tension headache. Head 29- 35.
ache 1993;33:566- 569. 50. Rutkiewicz T, Kononen M , Suominen-Taipale L,
38. Anttila P, M etsahonkala L, Mikkelsson M , Aromaa Nordblad A, Alanen P. Occurrence of clinical signs
M , Kautiainen H, Salminen J et al. Muscle tender of temporomandibular disorders in adult Finns.
ness in pericranial and neck-shoulder region in chil J Orofac Pain 2006;20:208- 217.
dren with headache: a controlled study. Cephalalgia 51. Hiltunen K, Peltola JS, Vehkalahti M M , Narhi T, Ain-
2002;22:340- 344. amo A. A 5-year follow-up of signs and symptoms
39. M ense S. Neurophysiology of muscle in relation of TM D and radiographic findings in the elderly. Int
to pain. In: Vaeroy H, M erskey H (eds). Progress J Prosthodont 2003;16:631- 634.
in Fibromyalgia and Myofascial Pain. Amsterdam: 52. Magnusson T, Egermarki I, Carlsson GE. A prospec
Elsevier, 1993:23- 39. tive investigation over two decades on signs and
40. Vanderas AP. Synergistic effect of malocclusion and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and as
oral parafunctions on craniomandibular dysfunction sociated variables: a final summary. Acta Odontol
in children with and without unpleasant life events. Scand 2005;63:99- 109.
J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:61- 65. 53. Mongini F, Ciccone G, Ibertis F, Negro C. Personal
41. Biondi DM . Physical treatments for headache: a ity characteristics and accompanying symptoms in
structured review. Headache 2005;45:738- 734. temporomandibular joint dysfunction, headache,
42. Grimmer K, Nyland L, Milanese S. Repeated mea and facial pain. J Orofac Pain 2000;14:52- 58.
sures of recent headache, neck and upper back pain 54. Alamoudi N. Correlation between oral parafunction
in Australian adolescents. Cephalalgia 2006;26: and temporomandibular disorders and emotional
843- 851. status among saudi children. J Clin Pediatr Dent
43. Sjaastad O, Wang H, Bakketeig LS. Neck pain and 2001;26:71- 80.
associated head pain: persistent neck complaint
with subsequent, transient, posterior headache.
Acta Neurol Scand 2006;114:392- 399.
,
.21
-
( )
, ,
- ( ). ,
(
: , - ).22 ,
, ( ),
( ), .22
.
,
, , 48-88 % ( . 17_2).2-18-23-24
. ,
, ,
,
.6-7 .910'25
90 % ( . 17-3).21723
, ,
, , ,
, ,5-7 ,
.8-10 , ,
,
17-1.
,%( ) ,
% In) ,
,%( ) %( )
,%
Bernst ein et al.” - 28 - - 75 (21) 25 (7)
Bu sh ’2 33 35 31 (11) 54(19) 86 (30) 14(5)
Gelb et al.13 34 38 37(14) 45(17) 82 (31) 18(7)
Gelb et al.14 43 26 65(17) 31 (8) 96 (25) 4 (1 )
Kelly et al.15 - 46 43 (20) 37 (17) 80 (37) 20 (9)
Kerst ein 16 23 23 - - . 83(19) 17(4)
Kull Leary17 55 117 - - 76 (135) 24 (42)
Rub inst ein et al.4 25 57 - - 46 (26) 54 (31)
Sim m o n s Gib b s18 66 - 64(41) 31 (20) 95(61) 5 (3 )
Tullb erg Ernb erg 1 - 73 - - 73 (53) 27(20)
W rig ht Bifano 19 38 93 56(52) 30 (28) 86 (80) 14(13)
W rig ht 2 35 132 55 (72) 28 (37) 83 (110) 17 (23)
17-2.
, ,
%( ) %( ) , ,
, %( ) %( )
%
Co o p er Kleinb erg 23 51 162 88(142) - - -
17-3.
,
%( ) ,%( ) ,
,% , %( )
%( )
Co o p er Kleinb erg 23 37 117 82 (96) - - -
Ku ll17 45 144 - - 90 (129) 10 (15)
W rig ht 2 20 75 63 (47) 28 (21) 91 (66) 9(7)
.36
,
, .
. 20 Levine37
(Costen), ,
- ,
( ), ,
,26 , .
.
.38 ,
.27 ,
,
,
.
,
.39
- ,
, .28
,
.
, , ,
, .
.2 ~31
.32-
34 , 68 %
-
- , , ,
, 8%
.33 ,
.40'41
, .
.35
, ,
, .10
, ,
( )36 , ,
( )
: 10 ).
• ;
•
; ,
• - .
;
• ,
, , ,
.42 . .
« »,
,
.
.10
.
, ,
, ( ,
. ,
,
( ). ).46
, 6 %
( -
- .43 ).46
,
.44 , ,
7% , ,
( ) .3'47-61
, 91
.45
( )
: (20 %
),
: (35 % )
• (30 % ).52
( ) ;
• 123
. ( )
.53
,
, .
- 46 41 %
/ ( , 500 , .53
2 10 )
( , 60 4-6 -
,
.
, .
,
.
,
,
( . 17-1 ). . 17-1.
. :
, -
, .
,
: ,
, - - . ,
,
( . 17-1
).54
2.
( , ),
.
3. (
)-
4. .
5. -
.
6.
.
7.
.10 .
. 8.
19 .
9.
. .
10. .
. 11.
1. (
18 1 ,
67 ). , .
,
, ,
.
1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 11 ,
.56-58
( = 0,0001). ,
.55
, .
2
( 18-78 ) ( )
.
, ( ) ,
.
,
,
( )
. .
1. .
2.
,
. 1. Tullberg , Ernberg . Long-term effect on tinni
tus by treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a
3. ,
two-year follow-up by questionnaire. Acta Odontol
Scand 2006;64:89- 96.
. 2. Wright EF. Otologic symptom improvement through
TM D therapy. Quintessence Int 2007;38:E564- 71.
3. Bjorne A, Agerberg C. Symptom relief after treat
, , ment of temporomandibular and cervical spine dis
, orders in patients with Meniere's disease: a three-
, year follow-up. Cranio 2003;21:50- 60.
( ) 4. Rubinstein B, Carlsson GE. Effects of stomatog
nathic treatment on tinnitus: a retrospective study.
Cranio 1987;5:254- 259.
. 5. Tuz HH, Onder EM , Kisnisci RS. Prevalence of
otologic complaints in patients with temporoman
dibular disorder. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2003;123:620- 623.
, 6. Parker WS, Chole RA. Tinnitus, vertigo, and tem
, poromandibular disorders. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
, Orthop 1995;107:153- 158.
7. Chole RA, Parker WS. Tinnitus and vertigo in pa
,
tients with temporomandibular disorder. Arch Oto
. , laryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:817- 821.
8. Shulman A (ed). Tinnitus: Diagnosis/ Treatment.
. New York: M artha Entenmann Research Center
Inc., 2004.
,
9. American Academy of Orofacial Pain. De Leeuw R
(ed). Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Di
, agnosis, and M anagement, ed 4. Chicago, IL: Quin
.56 tessence Publishing, 2008.
44. Merrill RL. Differential diagnosis of orofacial pain. 52. Kuttila S, Kuttila M , Le Bell Y, Alanen P, Suonpaa J.
In: Laskin DM , Greene CS, Hylander WL (eds). Characteristics of subjects with secondary otalgia.
Temporomandibular Disorders: An Evidenced-based J Orofac Pain 2004;18:226- 234.
Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. Chicago, IL: 53. Jaber JJ, Leonetti JP, Lawrason AE, Feustel PJ. Cer
Quintessence Publishing, 2006:299- 317. vical spine causes for referred otalgia. Otolaryngol
45. Jeon YD, Lee Jl, Cho BO, Rotaru H, Kim JC, Kim SC. Head Neck Surg 2008;138:479- 485.
Statistical correlation between pharyngitis and tem 54. Wright EF. Referred craniofacial pain patterns in
poromandibular joint disease. Oral Surg Oral Med patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Am
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:677- 681. Dent Assoc 2000; 131:1307- 1315.
46. ReiterS, Gavish A, Emodi-Perlman A, Eli I. Nasopha 55. Wright EF, Syms CA III, Bifano SL. Tinnitus, diz
ryngeal carcinoma mimicking a temporomandibular ziness, and non-otologic otalgia improvement
disorder: a case report. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:74- 81. through temporomandibular disorder therapy. Mil
47. Abel M D, Levine RA. Muscle contractions and audi Med 2000;165:733- 736.
tory perception in tinnitus patients and nonclinical 56. Cox KW. Temporomandibular disorder and new
subjects. Cranio 2004;22:181- 191. aural symptoms. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
48. Levine RA, Nam EC, Oron Y, M elcher JR. Evidence 2008;134:389- 393.
for a tinnitus subgroup responsive to somatosen 57. Seedorf H, Jude HD. Otalgia as a result of certain
sory based treatment modalities. Prog Brain Res temporomandibular joint disorders. Laryngorhinoo-
2007;166:195- 207. tologie 2006;85:327- 332.
49. Kraus S. Temporomandibular disorders, head and 58. Silveira AM , Feltrin PP, Zanetti RV, Mautoni M C.
orofacial pain: cervical spine considerations. Dent Prevalence of patients harboring temporoman
Clin North Am 2007;51:161- 193. dibular disorders in an otorhinolaryngology depart
50. Krabak BJ, Borg-Stein JP, Oas J, Dumais D. Re ment. Rev Bras Otorhinolaringol (Engl ed) 2007;73:
duced dizziness and pain with treatment of cervical 528- 532.
myofascial pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:
939- 940.
51. Lam DK, Lawrence HP, Tenenbaum HC. Aural
symptoms in temporomandibular disorder patients
attending a craniofacial pain unit. J Orofac Pain
2001;15:146- 157.
:
,
, .1-3
, , ,
,
.
( )
.
. ,
, , ,
. (
)
.4
. ,
,
. ,
.5
,
, ,
. ,
,
. ,
.6
-
.
,
- ( )
,
.
5, 6 7 .7
1 (Angle)10
."
I:
, -
.89 ,
-
, ( . 18-1 ).
II:
.
( . 18-1 ).
III:
( . 18-1 ).
.
,
.6'12-14
,
,
I III .
,
(. .
), .
.1516
Gadotti .17
. - ,
( ) ,
,
.
- ( . Michelotti et al.,21
II , Korbmacher et al.,6 Arm ijo Olivo et al.19
Hanke et al.22). - ,
. -
, Nobili .18
- .
50 , 23
. ,
.
,
. , ,
II
, ,
III
. .
,
- -
( ). , 1 .
,
, .24
, ,25
.19
.20
.
.
,
, ,
.12131626 , ,
, .31
.2728
,
.
, - -
.15 ( . 18-2).
, (7-23 %
,28 )
29 - .32
80 %
.
,
6 : .33
, ,
, ,
, , , ,
. ,
.
. .34
, .
, ,
. . ,
,
. , .
,
. Sato .35
.30 -
). , ,
.
: , ,
. ( )
,
2 . ( )
.
1 . ,
.
,
.
1-2 ,
( . 18-3).
. ,
,
- ( )
.37
.15 , -
. ,
.15
Huggare .30 , ,
- ( .38
) M ichelotti .39
,
( )
. Ben-Bassat .36
96 ( ),
,
705 , .
( .
( - , .
; St efano Co lam aio )
.
( )
(
.
)
,
1291
1159 , ,
1.
. ,
,
.
130 , , ,
( . 18-4). ,
,
. ,
,
( = 1,6). ,
. 10 .
,
. 120 ,
(10,3 %) . -
,
142 (12,2 %) 1159 .
. ,
. . Gangloff .2
,
,
, .
, ,
, ( )
,
. , .
, ,
II 1- ,
. , .40
, .41
26 (14 12 )
.21 ,
, .
, 52 «
, , » ,
.
.
. -
( . 18-5 18-5 ).
,
.
,
, ( )
.
.
.12
. , ,
, ( , )
,
.
. )
, (
( ), . . 20-
) 30 . ,
.
, ,
,
,
, .
.
, « »
(
)
. , ,
,
.
.
: ,
. , .
,
, (. . .
-
.
41 -
. :
, , 10
( ,
. ), 10-
, ( ) ,
,
( ).
. ( . 18-6 )
.
. 5
15° .
, ,
.
,42
, , ( . 18-6 ).
,
,
.
, ,
.
. Farella .43 ,
,
: , .
,
,
. ,
, Perinetti46
,
, (
,
)
. .
-
,
,
, ,
. , . ,
, -
. ,
,
.
.
,
-
. , Ferrario
.44 ,
. ,
10 ,
II
),
( 1. Bracco , Deregibus A, Piscetta R. Effects of differ
ent jaw relations on postural stability in human sub
jects. Neurosci Lett 2004;356:228- 230.
), 2. Gangloff P Louis JP, Perrin PP. Dental occlusion
( modifies gaze and posture stabilization in human
), subjects. Neurosci Lett 2000;293:203- 206.
3. Milani RS, De Periere DD, Lapeyre L, Pourreyron L.
( Relationship between dental occlusion and posture.
). Cranio 2000;18:127- 134.
4. Wada M , Sunaga N, Nagai M . Anxiety affects the
,22 postural sway of the antero-posterior axis in college
students. Neurosci Lett 2001;364:157- 159.
, , , 5. Cuez G. The posture. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH,
Jessel TM (eds). Principles of Neural Science. Am
, sterdam: Elsevier, 1991:612- 623.
6. Korbmacher H, Eggers-Stroeder G, Koch L, Kahl-
Nieke B. Correlations between anomalies of the
, dentition and pathologies of the locomotor sys
, . tem: a literature review. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65:
190-203.
7. Pinganaud G, Bourcier F, Buisseret-Delmas C, Buis-
,
seret P. Primary trigeminal afferents to the vestibu
lar nuclei in the rat: existence of a collateral pro
, jection to the vestibulo-cerebellum. Neurosci Lett
, 1999;264:133- 136.
8. Buisseret-Delmas C, Compoint C, Delfini C, Buis-
, seret P. Organization of reciprocal connections be
tween trigeminal and vestibular nuclei in the rat.
. J Comp Neurol 1999;409:153- 168.
, 9. M arfut CF, Rajchert DM . Trigeminal primary affer
ent projection to "non trigeminal" areas of the rat
central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 1991 ;303:
489- 511.
, 10. Angle EH. Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth
and Fractures of the M axillae: Angle's System, ed 6.
Philadelphia, PA: SS White Dental, 1990.
11. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics, ed 4. Phil
( ) adelphia, PA: Mosby-Elsevier, 2007.
12. Festa F, Tecco S, Dolci M , Ciufolo F, Di Meo S, Filippi
M R et al. Relationship between cervical lordosis and
facial morphology in Caucasian women with a skel
. , etal Class II malocclusion; a cross-sectional study.
Cranio 2003;21:121- 129.
13. Huggare J. Postural disorders and dentofacial mor
phology. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:383- 386.
,
.
Рудигер Эмсхофф
( / I)
- ,
( )
, , , , ,
( /
. II).
,
1 2
, . /
,
.
.
( / )
,
, .
.
.
.
,
/ / :
.
( / )
/
.
.2 , I
, ,
( ) ,
II 78
•
,
. •
/ / :
. •
/
:
9
,
.
2:
.
•
, .
• :
I
1: 10
•
•
•
3
• , ,
46 " 12 ( . 19-1)
• •
, ,
, ,
10
•
3: , ,
•
• -
6 13
•
14
. 19-1. - . ( )
: - . ( }
( ; ), b - , ( ) ( )
• / :
,
16
•
/ : / -
• ,
: . /
,
II .2
/
• ( ) .
:
(Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction
• Index) -
, ( , Craniomandibular Index).17-19
:
•
. ,
.16
/ .
-
( , Temporomandibular Index)20
19-1.
(Pehling et al.20)
« » , «1» -
I.
(0) (1)
(> 40 )
(> 40 ) (0) (1) (0) (1)
(> 40 ) (0) (1) (0) (1)
(> 7 ) (0) (1) (0) (1)
: (> 7 ) (0) (1) (0) (1)
- (> 7 ) (0) (1) (0) (1)
-
( )
(0)
(1)
(1)
( . .) (1)
II.
:
(0) (1) (0) (1)
/8 = (0) (0)
(1) (1)
(0) (1) (0) (1)
(0) (1) (0) (1)
(0) (1) (0) (1)
IV. -
+ + / 3=
( . 19-1). , .
. , .21
,
.
,
. ,
- .
: ,
.22
-
-
19-2. 23
( = 27) ( = 24) ( = 29) ( = 28/ 22)**
+
* 1
** /
*** . 1 ,
, ,
. .
-
-
.12
,
. ,
.24
.
( . 19-2).26
. 19-2.
( )
.25
,
( ), (
) ( ), ,
2
( .
).
.
, .
( Em sh o f f Ru d isch 26)
,
.25'27
.
,
,
( . 19-2).23
.
:
.
,
,
, , ,
- 16 % ,
( ) .3 ,
-
. ( ,
, - ,
( ), , ,
) ,
16-59 % - -
, .4
( ) ,
33-86 %.’ ,
,
,
, . ,
, ,
.
, , .
,
, ,
.
,
,
,
17 , .2
,
, ,
, , ,
. .5
, ,
,
, 20-1.
•
. ,
:
• :
.
, •
,
:
, ,
•
, , -
.
:
-
( . 5), .
( .
24). ,
, ( . 20-1).
, . 20-1
( ) ,
( 20-1). ,
, .
, , . . -
20-1.
( )
,
(
)
,
-
( . 27).
, .
.
- ,
,
,
, .17'1921
,
. ,
, -
.
,
.6
, . ,
,
, -, -,
, .
( ), ,
.
75-90 %
.7
.
20-2. PubM ed
(24 2009 . : TM D
t reat m ent . : 6954).
,
1933
. PubMed 1080
, /
( . 20-2). 722
,
615
,
179
, 165
151
95
( . 20-3). , 86
. 53
, 51
, 31
20-3. ,
.
,
Guard a- 30
N ard ini, 20089 , ,
,
.
Ab raham sso n, - 3
200710
,
.
Al- Belasy, 19
2007” ( .
)
,
,
,
, 200712 11 ,
V S.
, -
,
.
, 200713 7 ,
, ,
,
M edlicot t , , 30
200614
, .
,
,
,
, .
.
20-3.
M cN eely, 12 ,
200615
. ,
(
) ,
.
Ko h, 2004" 17
,
, 200418 13
,
(
) .
,
,
.
Fo rssell, 16
200419
.
List , 20 0320 7
.
Fo rssell, 18
199921 (
12 ,
).
(
,
)
, . ,
. .
- ,
, ,
,
, - (
. ,
, , )
.12 ( ).
,
,
. .
.
.
, .
.1 '18'19'21 ,
,
,
,22 , - ,
. ,23
.
,
.
, ,
,
.
, ,
,
, ( . 4).24
, -
,
,
. .2526
, ,
, .
,
, , .27
.
( )
.
alN S - ; Orb F -
- ; -
(
Bened et t i,29
Luana , M D, PhD, )
, .30
, ,
,
,
,
( . 25). .
,
, - :
31
( . 20-1 ).28-29
.32
, , , ,
,
,
. , . 24
, ,
, ,
, , ( . 8),
( . 6).
,
.
,
, , ,
, .
,
-, -
. , , , ,
,
.
,
- ,
. ,
.
, 37
,
, .38
.
.
,
. . ,
,
,
.33
, ( ),
. .
,
.
- ,
,
, ,
.
- , .39
,
2008 ., ,
,34 ,
- .
Clark35 ( . 20-4). ,
: / 40
,
.
. - ,
, ,
. ( . 20-2 20-2 ).
, ,
. ,
,
. , ,
( -
,36 ),
( -
)
(
. )
,
.
.
.
( ,
,
, ), ,
.41 , / . , -
20-4. ,
( )
1 31 2008 . (199 ; 166 , 33 ; 43,2 )
,%
( ) 53,3
( ) 51,3
( ) 15,7
( ) 18,7
( ) 29,6
( ) 36,7
( / )- 49,7
- 29,8
- 19,8
( ) 20-2.
,
• :
.
91 %
,
•
• :
( . 21 ).42 ,
• :
,
,
• :
.
,
• :
,
,
.
, 80 % .44
,
.46'46
( 20-2). ,
, . . ,
,
( , )
( .
)
, ,
.
,
.
,
. ,
43
« »
, .
.
19. Forssell , Kalso . Application of principles of 33. Manfredini D, Lobbezoo F. Role of psychosocial
evidence-based medicine to occlusal treatment for factors in the etiology of bruxism. J Orofac Pain
temporomandibular disorders: are there lessons to 2009;23:153- 166.
be learned? J Orofac Pain 2004;18:9- 22. 34. Stegenga B, de Bont LGM , Boering C. Osteoarthro
20. List T, Axelsson S, Leijon G. Pharmacologic inter sis as the cause of craniomandibular pain and dys
ventions in the treatment of temporomandibular function: a unifying concept. J Oral M axillofac Surg
disorders, atypical facial pain, and burning mouth 1989;47:249- 256.
syndrome: a qualitative systematic review. J Orofac 35. Clark GT. Classification, causation and treatment of
Pain 2003;17:301- 310. masticatory myogenous pain and dysfunction. Oral
21. Forssell H, Kalso E, Kostela P, Vehmanen R, Pukka A, M axillofac Surg Clin North Am 2008;20:145- 157.
Alanen P. Occlusal treatments in temporomandibu 36. Farella M . The clinch about clenching. Zurich: EACD
lar disorders: a qualitative systematic review of ran Annual M eeting, 2008.
domized controlled trials. Pain 1999;83:549- 560. 37. Svensson P, Burgaard A, Schlosser S. Fatigue and
22. Klasser GD, Greene CS. Oral appliances in the pain in human jaw muscles during a sustained,
management of temporomandibular disorders. low-intensity clenching task. Arch Oral Biol
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;46:773- 777.
2009;107:212- 223. 38. Nitzan DW, Benoliel R, Heir G, Dolwick F. Pain and
23. Travell JG, Rinzler S, Herman M . Pain and disability dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint. In:
of the shoulder and arm: treatment by intramus Sharav E, Benoliel R (eds). Orofacial Pain and Head
cular infiltration with procaine hydrochloride. J Am ache. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby-Elsevier, 2008:149-
Dent Assoc 1942;120:417- 422. 192.
24. M urray GM , Peck CC. Orofacial pain and jaw mus 39. Steenks M H, de Wijer A. Validity of the research
cle activity: a new model. J Orofac Pain 2007;21: diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders
263- 278. axis I in clinical and research settings. J Orofac Pain
25. De Bont LGM , Dijkgraaf LC, Stegenga B. Epide 2009;23:9- 16.
miology and natural progression of articular tem 40. Ohrbach R, Svensson P (Orgs). Validation studies of
poromandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral the RDC/ TM D: progress toward version 2. Toronto:
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:72- 76. Symposium of International Association for Dental
26. Stohler CS. Phenomenology, epidemiology, and Research, 2008.
natural progression of the muscular temporoman 41. Dibbets JM , van der Weele LT. Signs and symp
dibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol toms of temporomandibular disorders (TM D) and
Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:77- 81. craniofacial form. Am J Ortho Dentofacial Orthop
27. Raphael K, Marbach JJ. Evidence-based care 1996;110:73- 78.
of muscoloskeletal facial pain: implications for 42. Epker JT, Gatchel RJ, Ellis E. An accurate model for
the clinical science of dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc predicting TM D chronicity: practical applications in
1997;128:73- 79. clinical settings. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1470-
28. Benedetti F, Mayberg HS, Wager TD, Stohler CS, 1475.
Zubieta JK. Neurobiological mechanisms of the pla 43. Moses AJ. TM Ds: An evidence-based approach to
cebo effect. J Neurosci 2005;25:10390- 10402. diagnosis and treatment. J Craniomandibular Pract
29. L, Benedetti F. Placebo and painkillers: is 2007;25:5- 7 (book review).
mind as real as matter? Nat Rev 2005;6:545- 552. 44. Greene CS. The role of biotechnology in TM D di
30. Clark GT, Minakuchi H. Oral appliances. In: Laskin agnosis. In: Laskin DM , Greene CS, Hylander WL
DM , Greene CS, Hylander WL (eds). TM Ds: An Evi (eds). TM Ds: An Evidence-based Approach to Di
dence-based Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. agnosis and treatment. Chicago, IL: Quintessence
Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 2006:377- Publishing, 2006:193- 202.
390. 45. Manfredini D, M ontagna F, Bucci M B. Temporo
31. Farella M , Palumbo A, Milani S, Avecone S, Gallo mandibular disorders assessment in the medi
LM , Michelotti A. Synergist coactivation and substi cal legal setting. Tagete Arch Legal Med Dent
tution pattern of the human masseter and tempora 2007;12:1- 20.
lis muscles during sustained static contractions. Clin 46. Manfredini D, Bucci M B, M ontagna F, Guarda-Nar
Neurophysiol 2009;120:190- 197. dini L. Electromyography of jaw muscles is not use
32. Ettlin DA, Mang H, Colombo V, Palla S, Gallo LM . ful in the medical legal setting. Tagete Arch Legal
Stereometric assessment of TM J space variation by Med Dent 2008;13:1- 17.
occlusal splints. J Dent Res 2008;87:877- 881.
.12 , ,
-
, 75 % ,
( ) -
( ), 5-10 % ( )
.3 .6
-
, 12-20 .
.7
- Von Korff .,8 ,
( ) 10 % ,
6% , 20
.4 , , .
6-12 5,3 , ,
,
2
.
, .
, , ,
, 28 % ,
, .
.6
,
, , ,
4 , . ,
,
. Stohler Zarb9
,
. ,
( )
. , ,
,
(
) .14
, ,
,
, « -
» .
, ,
( )
. . ,
,
,
,
- . .15 ,
Fricton Schiffm an,10
,
, ,
40 %
- ,
. .
, - (the
. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial
, Research)
, , ( / ).16
,
,
, .1 Dworkin12 .
-
,
. George Engel13
,
. ,
, .1
« »
« ». ,
, . Waddell Loeser19
Engel13 -
, .
, ,
.1718 ,
,
,
. , .
,
,
.
,
- .
.
.
,
( ),
( )
,
.
,
,
.
, .11
,
, ( )
.117 ( ) ,
Loeser19 ,
.
. , ,
, ,
.21
, ,
, ,
, .22
(
-
. .). , -
Waddell20 , ( )
( ). ,
,
. . .
•
.29-31 , Dworkin
.32
•
, ,
• . .
. ,
• , 6 , ,
.
Turk .33
•
.34-38
• .49
.
• (200 )
, :
( ),
,
,
,
,
( ,
) ,
.24 ,
,25-27 ( );
. ;
. 12
I( / ). ,
,
,
.
Dworkin .35
,
Dahlstrom
Carlsson28. , ,
. 4
,
21-1.
0,872 ( )
( )
BDI 0,44 ( )
0,40 ( , )
( ,
, )
( , , , -
, )
,
.26 . 21-1
( = 56)
( =45) ,
.
,
,
,
. 21-1.
.
.43 - ; -
. , ; -
(2- 6 )
. ,
,
.27 . ,
( )
,
. . ,
96 %
,
.
422,91
131,84 ,
. , ( . 21-1).
,
. ,
.
, ,
,
.
.
.26'27
Robinson ., 2-6 M orley .23 ,
.42'43
17. Turk DC, Monarch ES. Biopsychosocial perspec 32. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Wilson L, Massoth D, Whit
tive on chronic pain. In: Turk DC, Gatchel RJ (eds). ney C, Huggins KH et al. Brief group cognitive-be
Psychological Approaches to Pain M anagement: A havioral intervention for temporomandibular disor
Practitioner's Handbook, ed 2. New York: Guilford, ders. Pain 1994;59:175- 187.
2002 . 33. Turk D, Zaki H, Rudy T. Effects of intraoral appliance
18. Gatchel RJ. Comorbidity of chronic mental and and biofeedback/ stress management alone and
physical health disorders: the biopsychosocial per in combination in treating pain and depression in
spective. Am Psychol 2004;59:792- 805. TM D patients. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:158- 164.
19. Loeser JD. Concepts of pain. In: Stanton-Hicks J, 34. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, Wilson L, Mancl L, Turner
Boaz R (eds). Chronic Low Back Pain. New York: J, Massoth D et al. A randomized clinical trial using
Raven Press, 1982. research criteria for temporomandibular disorders-
20. Waddell G. A new clinical method for the treatment Axis II to target clinic cases for a tailored self-care
of low back pain. Spine 1987;12:632- 644. treatment program. J Orofac Pain 2002;16:48- 63.
21. Moss RA, Garrett JC. Temporomandibular joint 35. Dworkin SF, Turner JA, Mancl L, Wilson L, Massoth
dysfunction syndrome and myofascial pain dys D, Huggins KH et al. A randomized clinical trial of
function syndrome: a critical review. J Oral Rehabil a tailored comprehensive care treatment program
1984;11:3- 28. for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain
22. Crider AB, Glaros AG. A meta-analysis of EMG bio 2002;16:259- 276.
feedback treatment of temporomandibular disor 36. Greco CM , Rudy , Turk DC, Herlich A, Zaki HH.
ders. J Orofac Pain 1999;13:29- 37. Traumatic onset of temporomandibular disorders:
23. M orley S, Eccleston C, Williams A. Systematic re positive effects of a standardized conservative treat
view and meta-analysis of randomized controlled ment program. Clin J Pain 1997;13:337- 347.
trials of cognitive behavior therapy and behavior 37. Rudy , Turk DC, Kubinski JA, Zaki HS. Differen
therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding head tial treatment response of TM D patients as a func
ache. Pain 1999;80:1- 13. tion of psychological characteristics. Pain 1995;61:
24. M ishra KD, Gatchel RJ, Gardea M A. The relative ef 103-112.
ficacy of three cognitive-behavioral treatment ap 38. Turk DC, Rudy , Kubinski JA, Zaki HS, Greco CM .
proaches to temporomandibular disorders. J Behav Dysfunctional patients with temporomandibular
Med 2000;23:293- 309. disorders: evaluating the efficacy of a tailored treat
25. Gardea M A, Gatchel RJ, M ishra KD. Long-term ef ment protocol. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:
ficacy of biobehavioral treatment of temporoman 139-146.
dibular disorders. J Behav Med 2001;24:341- 359. 39. Truelove E, Huggins KH, Mancl L, Dworkin SF. The
26. Gatchel RJ, Stowell AW, Wildenstein L, Riggs R, Ellis efficacy of traditional, low cost, and nonsplint thera
E. Efficacy of an early intervention for patients with pies for temporomandibular disorder: a randomized
acute TMD-related pain: a one-year outcome study. controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2006;137:1099-
J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:339- 347. 1107.
27. Stowell AW, Gatchel RJ, Wildenstein L. Cost analy 40. Turner JA, Mancl L, Aaron LA. Short- and long
sis of temporomandibular disorders: biopsychosocial term efficacy of brief cognitive-behavioral therapy
intervention versus treatment as usual. J Am Dent for patients with chronic temporomandibular dis
Assoc 2007;138:202- 208. order pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Pain
28. Dahlstrom L, Carlsson SG. Treatment of mandibu 2006;121:181- 194.
lar dysfunction: the clinical usefulness of biofeed 41. Epker JT, Gatchel RJ, Ellis E. An accurate model for
back in relation to splint therapy. J Oral Rehabil predicting TM D chronicity: practical applications in
1984;11:277- 284. clinical settings. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1470-
29. Dworkin SF, Massoth DL. Temporomandibular dis 1475.
orders and chronic pain: disease or illness? J Pros 42. Gatchel RJ, Oordt M S. Clinical Health Psychol
thet Dent 1994;72:29- 38. ogy and Primary Care: Practical Advice and Clinical
30. Fernandez E, Turk DC. The utility of cognitive cop Guidance for Successful Collaboration. Washington,
ing strategies for altering pain perception: a meta DC: American Psychological Association, 2003.
analysis. Pain 1989;38:123- 135. 43. Morley S, Vlaeyen JWS. Epilogue to the special top
31. Flor H, Birbaumer N. Comparison of the efficacy of ics series. Clin J Pain 2005;21:69- 72.
electromyographic biofeedback, cognitive-behav 44. Edinger JD, Wohlgemuth W K, Radtke RA, Marsh
ioral therapy, and conservative medical interven GR, Quillian RE. Cognitive behavioral therapy
tions in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal for treatment of chronic primary insomnia: a
pain. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993;61:653- 658. randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc
2001;285:1856- 1864.
- ,
( )
-
. .
( ) . .
,
,
, ,
,
. .
. ,
.
- ( )
( )
, ,
.
. ,
,
.
.
, 1- 2
.1-3
. ,
, . ,
. ,
. Andrade .16
,4 ,
, ,
.56
, . Visscher .17
250
.7'8
,
,
. .
,9
( .17
)10
.11
.
,
,18-21
.12 ,
.22 ,
.
, ,23
.12 8'24 -
( )
- -
. , .25
-
,2627
2829
. , .3031 ,
,
- .13 ,
.14 .32
Munhoz .15
, ,
,
2 ,
(20,7 10,5 %, ),
, ,
. Nicolakis .35
.33
Komiyama .34 ,
- .
,
.
,
.
6 16 20
.
, 13
,
, ,
, , . ,
(Pain Relief Scale)
, .36
Katsoulis .37 27
,
. ,
.
-
, . 93 %
, , ,
, , , 33 %
,
2 .43
.37 Mulet .38 Yoda .44
( ,
) 6 6 -
(Rocabado),
4 , . .
61,9 % (13 21 )
0 % (0 21 )
.38 , ,
.
, 23,1 % .44
.39
.42'4345
.
, ,
. Kirk .45
.,40 86 % 2 ,
2
,
. ,
10 .43
,
7% , ,
,
, .
. Jagger,46
, ,
,
.40 M essenger .41
8 .
.
.47
,
25 %.41 2 .48
Cleland .49 Yoda .44 ,
Nicolakis .,42 ,
,
13,3 %
13,3 %.42 , .
( ) (250 , 600 , 6 15 ,
7 )
.53-56 , ,
.61
,
.
.
904
(904 ,
4 / 2, 3 )60 (904 ,
27 , 9 )62 ,
830
Linde,57 (830 ,
( ) (90 , 10 , 40 ).63 ,
30 , -
)
. .64
6%
,
50 % .
(0,3 , 100 , ,
10 )
, , 69 %
( ).58
35 %
, .
.65
,
.65
,66
. .
• -
( )
, ,
.
• ,
- .
. ,
,
( ).
10-30 .
,
, ,
, .
( . 22-1).
,
- ,
( )
.
,
. ( ).
1.
. ( . 22-2).
2.
.
3.
.
,
.
.
,
.
, , .
-
. (
, )
.
( ) ( . 22-5).
, .
( )
(
, )
. , .
( . 22-3).
.
( . 22-6).
, .
-
(
, )
. , .
( . 22-4).
.
. 22-7. .
. .
( . 22-7 22-7 ). .
.
.
( . 22-9 ) ( . 22-9 )
,
- ,
, .
( . 22-9 ).
.
( . 22-8).
- -
,
.
, ,
.
( . 22-10).
.
1
. 3
.
. 20 ,
( ) ,
.
,
.
(
( ) ).
.
, .
,
,
, . .
10 ,
.
. 22-12a-22-12d. . 22-13.
- -
,
,
. .
.
-
. -
-
10 ,
, .
,
, .
. ( . 22-13).
.
10 ,
( . 22-11 ).
.
1. Bogduk N. The clinical anatom y o f the cervical dor
sal rami. Spine 1982;7:319- 330.
2. Hu JW , Dostrovsky JO , Sessle BJ. Functional proper
- ties of neurons in cat trigeminal subnucleus caudalis
( . 22-11 ). (m edullary dorsal horn). I. Responses to oral-facial
noxious and nonnoxious stimuli and projections
to t halam us and subnucleus oralis. J Neurophysiol
1981;45:173- 192.
( . 22-11 ). 3. Sessle BJ, Hu JW , Dubner R, Lucier- CE. Functional
properties of neurons in cat trigeminal subnucleus
caudalis (m edullary dorsal horn). II. M odulation of
responses to noxious and nonnoxious stimuli by pe
riaqueductal gray, nucleus raphe m agnus, cerebral
co rt ex, and afferent influences, and effect of nalo x
one. J Neurophysiol 1981;45:193- 207.
4. Darian- Sm it h I. The trigem inal system . In: Iggo A
(ed ). Handbook of Sensory Physiology, ed 2. Som a
, tosensory System . Berlin: Springer, 1973:271- 314.
. 5. Fricton J, Kroening R, Haley D. M yofascial pain
, syndrom e: a review of clinical characteristics o f 168
cases. J Oral Surg 1982;60:615- 623.
( )
6. Rocabado M , Johnston BE, Blakney M G. Physical
10-15 . therapy and dentistry: an o verview. J Cranio m an
3 dibular Pract 1983;1:47- 49.
30 ( . 22-12 —22-12 ). 7. Carossa S, Catapano S, Previgliano V, Preti G. The
incidence of craniom andibular disorders in patients
wit h cervical dysfunctions. A clinico- statistical as
sessm ent. M inerva Stomatol 1993;42:229- 233.
- - 8. Braun BL. Postural differences between asym pt om
( . 22-12d). atic men and wom en and craniofacial pain patients.
Arch Phys M ed Rehabil 1991;72:653- 656.
9. Lund , Nishiyam a , M oller . Postural act iv 26. Boyd CH , Slagle WF, Boyd CM , Bryant RW, Wiygul
ity in the muscles of mastication wit h the subject JP. The effect of head position on electrom yography
upright, inclined, and supine. Scand J Dent Res evaluations o f representative m andibular position
1970;78:417- 424. ing muscle groups. Cranio 1987;5:50- 54.
10. Preiskel HW. Some observations on the postural posi 27. Forsberg CM , Hellsing E, Linder-Aronson S, Sheik-
tion of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1965;15:625. holeslam A . EM G activit y in neck and masticatory
11. Brat zlavsky M , Eecken V. Postural reflexes in cranial muscles in relation to extension and flexion o f the
muscles in man. Act a Neurol Belg 1977;77:5- 11. head. Eur J Ort hod 1985;7:177- 184.
12. M ako fsky HW. The effect o f head posture on 28. Goldstein DF, Kraus SL, William s W B, Glasheen-
muscle contact position: the sliding cranium theory. W ray M . Influence of cervical posture on m andibu
J Craniom andibular Pract 1989;7:286- 292. lar m ovem ent. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:421^ J26.
13. Sonnesen L, Bakke M , Solow B. Temporomandibular 29. Visscher CM , Huddleston Slater JJ, Lobbezoo F,
disorders in relation to craniofacial dimensions, head Naeije M . Kinematics of the hum an mandible fo r d if
posture and bite force in children selected fo r orth ferent head postures. J Oral Rehabil 20 00 ;2 7:299 -
odontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 2001 ;23:179- 192. 305.
14. loi H, M atsum oto R, Nishioka AA, Goto TK, Nakata S, 30. Ayub E, Glasheen- W ray M , Kraus S. Head posture:
Nakasima A et al. Relationship of TM J osteoarthritis/ a case study o f the effects on the rest position of
osteoarthrosis to head posture and dentofacial mor the mandible. J Ort hop Sports Phys Th er 1984;5:
phology. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008;11:8- 16. 179- 183.
15. M unho z W C, M arques AP, Siq ueiraJT. Radiograph 31. M ohl N D. Head posture and its role in occlusion.
ic evaluation o f cervical spine o f subjects wit h t em N Y State Dent J 1976;42:17- 23.
porom andibular jo int internal disorder. Braz Oral 32. Olivo SA, Bravo J, M agee DJ, Thie N M , M ajor PW,
Res 2004;18:283- 289. Flores- M ir C. The association between head and
16. Andrade AV, Gom es PF, Teixeira- Salm ela LF. Cer cervical posture and tem porom andibular disorders:
vical spine alignm ent and hyoid bone positioning a system atic review. J Oro fac Pain 20 06;20:9- 23.
wit h tem porom andibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 33. Wrig ht EF, Domenech M A, Fischer JR Jr. Usefulness of
2007;34:767- 772. posture training for patients with temporomandibular
17. Visscher CM , De Boer W, Lobbezoo F, Habets LL, disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:202- 210.
Naeije M . Is there a relationship between head 34. Kom iyam a O , Kaw ara M , Arai M , Asano T,
posture and craniom andibular pain? J Oral Rehabil Kobayashi K. Posture correction as part of b ehav
2002;29:1030- 1036. ioural therapy in treatm ent of myofascial pain with
18. Clark GT, Green EM , Bornan M R, Flack VF. Cranio limited opening. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:428- 435.
cervical dysfunction levels in a patient sample from 35. Nicolakis P, Erdogmus B, Kop f A, Nicolakis M ,
a tem porom andibular jo int clinic. J Am Dent Assoc Piehslinger E, Fialka- M oser V. Effectiveness o f ex
1987;115:251- 256. ercise therapy in patients wit h myofascial pain
19. Alanen P, Kirveskari P. Occupational cervicobrachial dysfunction syndrom e. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:
disorder and tem porom andibular jo int dysfunction. 362- 368.
J Craniom andibular Pract 1985;3:69- 72. 36. Gavish A , W ino cur E, Astandzelo v- Nachm ias T,
20. Heloe B, Heiberg AN , Krogstad BS. A m ultipro Gazit E. Effect of controlled m asticatory exercise on
fessional study o f patients wit h myofascial pain- pain and muscle perform ance in m yofascial pain pa
dysfunction syndrom e, I. Act a Odont ol Scand tients: a pilot study. Cranio 2006;24:184- 190.
1980;38:109- 117. 37. Katsoulis J, Richter M . Efficacy o f specific physio
21. Nicolakis P, Nicolakis M , Piehslinger E, Ebenbichler t herapy fo r tem porom andibular jo int dysfunction
G, Vachud a M , Kirtley C et al. Relationship between of m uscular origin. Rev Stomatol Chir M axillofac
craniom andibular disorders and poor posture. Cran 2008;109:9- 14.
io 2000;18:106- 112. 38. M ulet M , Decker KL, Look JO , Lenton PA,
22. Darlow LA, Pesco J, Greenberg M S. The relation Schiffm an EL. A randomized clinical trial assessing
ship o f posture to myofascial pain dysfunction syn the efficacy o f adding 6 x 6 exercises to self-care
drom e. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:73- 75. fo r the t reatm ent o f m asticatory myofascial pain. J
23. Huggare JA, Raustia AM . Head posture and cervi- Oro fac Pain 2007;21:318- 328.
covertebral and craniofacial m orphology in patients 39. Grace EG, Sarlani E, Reid B. The use o f an oral ex
wit h craniom andibular dysfunction. J Cranio m an ercise device in the t reatm ent of m uscular TM D .
dibular Pract 1992;10:174- 179. Cranio 2002;20:204- 208.
24. Olm os SR, Kritz- Silverstein D, Halligan W , Silver- 40. Kirk W S Jr, Calabrese DK. Clinical evaluation of
stein ST. The effect of condyle fossa relationships physical therapy in the m anagem ent of internal d e
on head posture. Cranio 20 05 ;23:48- 52. rangem ent o f the tem porom andibular joint . J Oral
25. M iralles R, M end oza C, Santander H, Zunig a C, M axillo fac Surg 19 8 9 ;4 7 :113- 119.
M o ya H. Influence o f stabilization occlusal splints 41. M essenger K, Barghi N, Burg arC, Rey R. Effect o f ex
on sternocleidomastoid and masseter electrom yo ercise and rest on amplitude of TM J click [abstract]. J
graphic activity. Cranio 1992;10:297- 304. Dent Res 1982;61:IADR abstract no. 1549.
-
-
- ,
( )
, .
,
, ,
.
. ,
. ,
, , ,
.1 .
,
.
( ), ,
, , , -
, .23
.
, , ,
, . .
.
.
,
5 ( -
3 10)
3
.
,
. . -
.
,
,
, , - ,
( ) . ., .
.4-6 (
, ),
,
. ,
1( )
, ( ),
, ,
- , .6 ,
.
, . 4
, (LTB4)
,
, ,
.
.
,
, ,
( ) -
,
( ) . 23-1.
,
. - :
, •
. ,
;
• ,
. ;
• ,
2, .
2;
• ,
.
, ;
• ,
- ( ) -
. .
, .
. ,
,
,
, ,
. ,
.15 ,
.
4 .
, .
,
. , , . .
. .
,
.16
.
, ,
, -
( 23-1). .
,
, ,
,
, -
. ,9
,
.18
.1011
, ,
,
, ,7'8 13 .14
,9
.10-14
,
,7 , 20 ,
. 23-1.
23-1.
-
Ekberg, 1998 - .
( (50 2-3 ,
)8 )
32 ,
.
Di Rienzo - 36
Businco, 2004 2
( .
(18 )
)’9 (50 2
) 14 .
(18 )
- 16 / (
-
, 10 4
14 )
M ejersjo, 2008 - 27 2 (
( 36-76 ) «
)7 ». ,
(50 3 3 ,
)
1
Obeid,1992 - - 42
(
.
- 3 .
)16 - (12
)- .
(15 )
17 /
. (15 )
34 / .
( <0, 01)
( < 0,05).
Swift , 1998 - - ,
( ,
-
)20 . -
( ) 50
42 iPGE2
. - .
- 3
, iPGE2
-
, 2004 ( - -
-
)’5 68 ,
.
-
, .
. -
100 2 3
500 2 ,
6 6 .
,
.
, ,
-
M iyamoto, 2007 - - 10 ( )
( 15 /
-
)2’ - -
. -
. 2-6 . ,
( )
, -
(
II) - 15 / .
8
, 1981 15
( (
), 18 ,
)22 .
1 3 . .
,
,
-
. ,
,
-
,
23-1.
Appelgren, 1996 22
( (29 )
« »
)23 ,
,
NPY-LI
. 2-3
.
. ,
NPY-LI
Y- 2-3 ,
(NPY-LI)
( , .
4-6 ) ,
NPY-LI
Plesh, 2000
( - a
(10-30 ) 6 1 6 1
)10 .
6 1
,
1
6-
Rizzatti- 12 -
Barbosa, 2003 - a
( 2 , 1 (75 %)
2 (28 %)
)11 14 : 1 - 25 3
2- ( < 0,1). A
.
7
( ), 14-
7-
Harkins, 1991 - -
( - -
,
)2"
,
.
, ,
.
,
Nemcovsky, -
1992 ( - -
: .
)25 ,
61 .
.
,
( ),
. 61 19 .
, 30
12 -
,
(
,
)
Singer, 1997 -
(
-
)13 ,
.
. ,
39
(35 ,4 )
,
,
3 .
.
: , ,
, -
DeNucci, 1998 -
( - - 20 , - ,
4 .
)14 , ,
-
,
, .
3
Herman, 2002 - 41 ,
( - - « -
, / ».
)26 -
,
.
3 : (0,5 .
), (10
),
23-1.
Rizzatti- -
Barbosa, 2003
( (S),
(28,5 % -
)27 ( ) 47,6 % - )
( ) - -
( )
, 2008
( -
- ,
)12
( ,
- ,
- ) ( =30) ,
, ,
( .
, =38).
/
Ayesh, 2007 - ,
( - -
)28
, -
28
( 27,4± 6,2 )
. ,
(2,5 / ) -
( =14) . ,
(
) -
( =14) ,
, 2008 45
( - ,
( < 0,05),
)29 ,
: G1 -
(
); G2 - 0,25 %
; G3 - 0,25 %
.
12-
Castrillon, 2008 - ,
( - N- -
- 14 D- (NM DA)
)30
(10 ,
4 ). .
0,2
( NaCi
150 / )
. ,
Ayesh, 2008 -
( -
-
)31 .
N-Memn-D- (NMDA)
18
,
N-M emn-D-
(NM DA) -
, 2004 11
( 5- 3- - -
- -
)32 (5- )
5- 3
5- .
M anfredini, 145
2004 ( - « - 42 78 (53,8 %)
»
)9 , 18 78
/ . (23,1 %)
78
- , ,
( )- 4 /
(1 2 2
- ) , 18 78 (23,1 %)
2
,
23-1.
(200 )
( < 0,05),
Nguyen, 2001 ,
( ( ) 1500
- 1200 12
)35 , ,
( ) ,
. 45 , ,
.
,
4
.
Winocur, 2000 -
( -
30 .
)36
.
.
0,025 % ,
-
4 4
Lobo, 2004
( - -
)37 -TM J 2
2 .
. 52 (5 ,
47 ) - TM J -
- 2
2 .
-
TM J, -
, 1991
( , (4 )
,
)” ( .
, 41
)
,
,
List, 2001
( ( 0,1
)38 ) 53 ,
/ -
,
( 1 . -
)
. ,
,
1
M pystad, 2008 40
( , :2 ,
)39 ( , . -
36
6
.
Furst, 2001 - 32
(
, (
)40 ( - - ).
) . ( )
4 . 1(
) ,
, 2-
, 3- 24-
, 4-
23-1.
Kunjur, 2003
( 10- ,
- 298 ,
)41 405 < 0,001, 269
(90 %)
.
.
, 1 6
1 ,
, 2-
1,2 / , 3-
- 1,2 /
( 10 )
Schiffm an, 1996 - 27 , -
(
)43 ( ) 3 : ,
( ,
), -
( )
-
/ - -
. , ,
1990- . -2,
80 .
23-2.
. ,
- -2,
, , , -
, . - 50 8
15 12
-2. 40 12
-2.46 100 12
15 24
, 200 24
. 400 24
.
4-5 .
,
.
, .
,
. ,
, -
( , , ).47
,
,
.
,
.
2 . (
, ) -
,
. .
,
. 23-2.
.
. ,
36 ,
, ,
,
48 . . ,
, -2
, ,
. ,
. 8
, 12 .
-
, .
,
. 1950- .,
, ,
,
, , ,
. ,
( ) .
, ,
.
2
,
2
,
. , ,
.
, ,
-2. , ,
-
- .
,
,
. ,
, .48
,
, -
23-3.
,
,
20 90
4 5 60
4 5 200
5 4 300
25- 30 0,75 300
25- 30 0,6 300
, 500-800 / 12 /
4-6 .
.49
-
,
, , .
,
. ,
-6- .
, ,
, ,
- ,
.
. 23-3.
, ,
,
.
, , -
, ( - ),
(
), .
,
. ,
.
. ,
, .
,
,
,
2,
.
, ,
- ,
. - .
,
.
, 23-4. ,
,
. ,
100 , , A 10-75
, , , 10-50
, . 10-75
. 10-75
, - ,
.
- , .
,
,
. .
- -
. .
,
-
, .
-
, , ,
.
. ,
. .
,
. - ,a , -
5-10 , , ( . 23-4).
- , ,
,
3-7 .50
.
, ,
, , .
.
,
( , , ),
, , , .
.
16 .
23-5. ,
,
2- 5
0,5-1
. 0,5-1
15- 50
, , -
, ,
(
) .
, , .
,
, . , ,
.
.
.
.
, , -
, . ( ),
1 2% ,
-
, (GABA), .
. GABA
.
, 45-60 ,
. 20-50 , . .
.
- , - ,
A- . ,
.
, -450,
, .
,
. ,
,
,
23-6. ,
. ,
, 350 3
750 3
10 3
. * 2- 5 3
* ,
{ ,
.).
-
, , .
, . -
- , ,
, ,
. .18
-
,
5-10 .
48 . , ,
- 2 , - 0,2-0,5 / . , ,
.
- ,
. ,
,
,
. .
: ,
. ,
, .
,
- ,
. .
, .
, .
. -
, .
( ), , , ,
,
. ,
,
,
- , .
, ,
. ,
, , ,
, ,
, .
, , -
.
. .
.
.
. - ,
5-30 . -
2- - .
,
,
.
.
. ,
3 2-4 8-
. .
. 23-6. .
,
,
( . 23-1).
.
.
, , 1. Turner J, Deyo R, Loesser J, Von Korff M,
Fordyce WE. The importance of placebo effects
, ,
in pain treatment and research. J Am Med Assoc
, , 1994;271:1609- 1614.
. 2. Gregg JM , Rugh JD. Pharmacological therapy. In;
Mohl ND, Zarb GA, Carlsson GE, Rugh JD (eds). A
Textbook on Occlusion. Chicago, IL: Quintessence,
- , 1988:351- 353.
3. Hersch EV, Balasubramaniam R, Pinto A. Pharma
. cologic management of temporomandibular disor
, ders. Oral M axillofac Surg Clin North Am 2008;20:
197-210.
4. Dray A. Inflammatory mediators of pain. Br J An-
, aesth 1995;75:1725- 1731.
5. Ong CKS, Seymour RA. Pathogenesis of postopera 20. Swift JQ, Roszkowski MT, Alton T, Hargreaves KM.
tive oral surgical pain. Anesth Prog 2003;50:5- 17. Effect of intra-articular versus systemic antiinflam
6. Bathon JM , Chilton FH, Hubbard W C, Towns M C, matory drugs in a rabbit model of temporoman
Solan NJ, Proud D. Mechanisms of prostanoid syn dibular joint inflammation. J Oral M axillofac Surg
thesis in human synovial cells: cyt ok in e- p ep t id e 1998;56:1288- 1295.
synergism. Inflammation 1996;20:537- 554. 21. Miyamoto H, Onuma H, Shigematsu H, Suzuki S,
7. Mejersjo C, Wenneberg B. Diclofenac sodium Sakashita H. The effect of etodolac on experimen
and occlusal splint therapy in TM J osteoarthri tal temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in dogs.
tis: a randomized controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:358- 363.
2008;35:729- 738. 22. Kopp S, Wenneberg B. Effects of occlusal treatment
8. Ekberg EC, Kopp S, Akerman S. Diclofenac sodium and intra-articular injections on temporomandibu
as an alternative treatment of temporomandibular lar joint pain and dysfunction. Acta Odontol Scand
joint pain. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:154- 159. 1981;39:87- 96.
9. Manfredini D, Romagnoli M , Cantini E, Bosco M. 23. Alstergren P, Appelgren A, Appelgren B, Kopp S,
Efficacy of tizanidine hydrochloride in the treatment Lundeberg T, Theodorsson E. The effect on joint flu
of myofascial face pain. M inerva Med 2004;95: id concentration of neuropeptide Y by intra-articu
165-171. lar injection of glucocorticoid in temporomandibular
10. Plesh O, Curtis D, Levine J, M cCall WD Jr. Ami joint arthritis. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:1- 7.
triptyline treatment of chronic pain in patients 24. Harkins S, Linford J, Cohen J, KramerT, Cueva L. Ad
with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil ministration of clonazepam in the treatment of TM D
2000;27:834- 841. and associated myofascial pain: a double-blind pilot
11. Rizzatti-Barbosa CM , Nogueira MT, de Andrade ED, study. J Craniomandib Disord 1991;5:179- 186.
Ambrosano GM , de Albergaria-Barbosa JR. Clinical 25. Nemcovsky CE, Gazit E, Serfati V, Gross M . A com
evaluation of amitriptyline for the control of chronic parative study of three therapeutic modalities in a
pain caused by temporomandibular joint disorders. temporomandibular disorder (TM D) population.
Cranio 2003;21:221- 225. Cranio 1992;10:148- 155.
12. Ivkovic N, Miadenovic I, Petkoci S, Stojic D. TM D 26. Herman CR, Schiffman EL, Look JO, Rindal DB. The
chronic pain and masseter silent period in psychiat effectiveness of adding pharmacologic treatment
ric patients on antidepressive therapy. J Oral Rehabil with clonazepam or cyclobenzaprine to patient
2008;35:424- 432. education and self-care for the treatment of jaw
13. Singer E, Dionne R. A controlled evaluation of ibu- pain upon awakening: a randomized clinical trial.
profen and diazepam for chronic orofacial muscle J Orofac Pain 2002;16:64- 70.
pain. J Orofac Pain 1997;11:139- 146. 27. Rizzatti-Barbosa CM , Martinelli DA, Ambrosano GM ,
14. DeNucci DJ, Sobiski C, Dionne RA. Triazolam im de Albergaria-Barbosa JR. Therapeutic response of ben
proves sleep but fails to alter pain in TM D patients. zodiazepine, orphenadrine citrate and occlusal splint as
J Orofac Pain 1998;12:116- 123. sociation in TM D pain. Cranio 2003;21:116-120.
15. LE, Dionne RA. Treatment of painful temporo 28. Ayesh EE, Ernberg M , Svensson P. Effects of lo
mandibular joints with a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibi cal anesthetics on somatosensory function in
tor: a randomized placebo-controlled comparison the temporomandibular joint area. Exp Brain Res
of celecoxib to naproxen. Pain 2004;111:13- 21. 2007;180:715- 725.
16. Obeid G, Zhang X, Wang X. Effect of ibuprofen on 29. Venancio RA, Alencar FG, Zamperini C. Differ
the healing and remodeling of bone and articular ent substances and dry-needling injections in pa
cartilage in the rabbit temporomandibular joint. tients with myofascial pain and headaches. Cranio
J Oral M axillofac Surg 1992;50:843- 849. 2008;26:96- 103
17. Kopp S, Akerman S, Nilner M . Short-term effect of 30. Castrillon EE, Cairns BE, Ernberg M , Wang K,
intra-articular sodium hyaluronate, glucocorticoid, Sessle BJ, Arendt-Nielsen L et al. Effect of peripheral
and saline injections on rheumatoid arthritis of the NM DA receptor blockade with ketamine on chronic
temporomandibular joint. J Craniomandib Disord myofascial pain in temporomandibular disorder pa
1991;5:231- 238. tients: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-con-
18. Manfredini D, Landi N, Tognini F, Orlando B, Bosco trolled trial. J Orofac Pain 2008;22:122- 130.
M . Muscle relaxants in the treatment of myofas 31. Ayesh EE, Jensen TS, Svensson P. Effects of intra-
cial face pain: a literature review. M inerva Stomatol articular ketamine on pain and somatosensory func
2004;53:305- 313. tion in temporomandibular joint arthralgia patients.
19. Di Rienzo Businco L, Di Rienzo Businco A, D'Emilia Pain 2008;137:286- 294.
M , Lauriello M , Coen Tirelli G. Topical versus sys 32. Kimos P, Biggs C, Mah J, Heo G, Rashiq S, Thie NM
temic diclofenac in the treatment of temporo-man- et al. Analgesic action of gabapentin on chronic
dibular joint dysfunction symptoms. Acta Otorhino- pain in the masticatory muscles: a randomized con
laryngol Ital 2004;24:279- 283. trolled trial. Pain 2007;127:151- 160.
.9
,
,
-
( ) . ,
- ( ).
, . ,
.2-6
( / )7
« » « ,
». ,
, ,
« » « ».7 .10
.
,
( )
-
- - ,
. ( 24-1).
, , , ,
,8
,
,
,
.
-
24-1.
.
Palla"
, , ,
( )
.
,
,
,
( 3-6 ).
.
,
-
,
,
.
.
.
, , -
, . .16
,
,
. « ,
( .1617 ,
) ,
. ,
< ...> ,
.18
, ,
,
».12 ( )
.
:19
• ( 24-2);
•
, ;
« » « », • ;
. « • ;
» . • .
,
( ,
. , ,
, ) ,
,
.'3™ .
.20
« »
150
« »
,
,
Klasser Greene20 ,
. (
, .
Schwartz,21 Perry,22 M cNeill23 Greene24.)
,
, 1924-1959 .
. 20 ,32-49 ,
, ,
,
,
. ,
(Jam es Bray Costen).
-
- ,
,
,
( ) .
,
1850- . ,
,
, , .
,
.
.25-30
.
,
,
.31 ,
, . .
.
,
.
24-3.
• « »
70
«
,
» «
.
».
• ,
,
,
.
. 100
.
,
(Wilhelm
Wallisch) ,
.70 ( ,
:
« ?»
.
2005 .,
«
»
.- , .) « »:
,
, « ».59-65
,
.50-03 ,
: « »
(Harry Sicher) ( ) « » ( ).66-68
.64
1959 .69
(Zim m erm an).55 ( . 24-3): «
-
(Laszlo Schwartz)
2500 , ,
.
.21
1950- . .
,
, ,
,
« » .
.5667 ».
,
1 .
,
,
( ) :71
« , .
, « , ,
».69 .
.
2
,
,
.
. ,
,
,
.69 . ,
.71 .
-
,
( 1959 .) ».69
(Shore) : «
,
.
, .
, , 1. ,
. .
».71 2.
:73
(Ramfjord),72 a)
32 ;
, b)
, . .
, ( ),
(
) ;
. c) , . .
,
( .- , .) .
24-4. «
»
, .73
« ,
» « ,
» . , , ( )
, ( 24-4).
« » ,
, ,71 . .
.74 , ( . 24-5).79
,
,
.75 .
« »,
,
. ,
,
70
( )
- .
« »( . 24-1).
,
,
( ) ,
24-1. (8- .) « »
,
, *
,
*
*** ( )
**
***
( ):
* « » .
** - ,76 «
», « ».
* ** « » . ,
,77'78
.
24-5.
,
,
. Klineberg80 .
:
,
.
,
:
•
; .80
• ,
; .
• , , «
» «
»
. «
».71 ,
. ( ,
, - ).16
«
».
, , ,86
.3182 87 .
, «
.83'84 Ren » « »
.85 34 , .88 Ross89 : «
, ,
( , ».
, ) - (9 10)
. 41 % (
).90-92 Agerberg Sandstrom77 ,
. 88 % 89 %
,
. Stohler,97
, .
.77
,
,
.77
Agerberg Sandstrom :
« ,
,
9 10 ,
( ,
, ) .9899
Michelotti .98
.
».77 . ,
(
) , -
.
.
, - ,
,
, ,93 ,
.73 .100
, ,
Michelotti .98
,94
.95 , 0,25 ,
(
) ( )
, . 8 .
, .
- 8 .
,
,
,
.
. (Welden
Bell)96 « (!)
»,
,
, 2 .
, ,
.
(
,
. ,
).
,
.
,
8 ( )
.
.
, Le Bell ."
.
, •
.98
(
Le Bell ),
.99 .
• (!)
. ,
( ). ,
, (
, , , -
)
. .
( ),
,
22 , 10
. ,
, , ,
0,3 , .101
. 25 ,
,
, (
). 2
( ,
. , ),
.102 ,
.103104 (1995),
.115 ,
, ,
« » ,
. , - (
( , , )
)
,
.
( ,
), ,
.105 . Stohler,116
,
,106107
.95 .
, •
,
,
. . ,
,
.
• ( ,
, , )
,
.108 ,
, 2006 . .
, , .
16 % 9% ,
.109
-
110 .
,
. ,
111"114 .
, -
117118'120
( 6 ). 121-124
, , .
- ,
.97 ,
, .76
,
:
. ,
( . 24-1 24-2).
,
. -
•
3-4 . .
• ,
,
.125"131 .
,
, -
, ,
, . . .19
. ,
,
,
, .138-141
,132
,
,133 .134-136 .142
( . 24-4).129'130'143144
,
,
. ,146 ,
• ( ,
).
•
(
). ,
• ( .146"148
).
• (
). ,
.
( )
( ).
,137
, ,
.
.
.149-152
,
,
.
,
50
: «
»100.
,
. 24-4.
(M E)
( 4 ) . , ME
.
, , . .
M E,
,153
. ,
, .
. ,
,
,
.24 6-8
, .
,
.136
.
3 ,
,
, .
,
( ) 1
.135
,
7 .156
. ,
, .
138154 ( )
165 ,
, , , ,
,
. ( ,
). ,
.157 , ,
,
, « »
, ,
.158 , « ».70
, ,
,
,
( ) .
,
,
, -
,
.159 ,
, .162
, ,
.160 ,
,
, . 80 % .163-164
,
, ( ) .165-168
,
- ,
,161
.
- ,15
.106-107 1960- .
, ,
(Ramfjord Ash),
.
.128 , ,
,
,
, . .
.145
( ). 1978 . Geering Lang
( , )
144 ,
.169
( .145
) •
.
. 24-5.
:
.
-
.
( 1 )
,
, .
- ( )
. 24-6.
. 24-7.
. 24-8.
• ( . 24-5-24-7).
( ). , ,
• (
).
• ( ( . 24-8).
) . •
• (
145) :170
1
145
.
•
,172
(1 )
, .
-
. ,
,
.
. ,
, 1-2 ,
.
.154
.20
1-2 . -
6 -
. ,
( (< 1 )
, (
) 6-8 )
.15
. , (
24 ) ,
, : (6-8 ),
• 171 ( (Hawley), (Sved)
- (Shore),
.
, );
•
171 ( ,
);
• (Best Bite),173
.154 (anterior midline point stop
device, AM PS),174 (Swedish
, device)175
, (Nociceptive
Trigeminal Inhibition Tension Suppression
, System , NTI-tss).
.109 ,176 NTI-tss
( . 24-9)
.
,
.20164 , -
4* »>*
іМ й
. 24-9. N TI- t ss . 24-10.
,
,
,
,
.
, ,
. .
NTI-tss
( ) .177
, ,
, -
.176
.178 ,
, ,
( . 24-10). 3-4 ,106 -
•
• *
. 24-11. - . 24-12.
...
. 24-15. . 24-16.
, ,
.
( . 24-14 24-15).
( . 24-16).177
.
( . 24-11).
( . 24-12).
( . 24-13).
, :
8 .
, .
. , ,
.
.72
.
20
,
.
, ,
,
, .188
, .182 .
,
,
.
, ,
,183184 ,
,185 . ,
,
,186 - ,
( )
. .
,
187
66. Keshvad A, Winstanley RB. An appraisal of the lit 84. Pullinger AG, Hollender L, Solberg W K, Petersson
erature on centric relation. Part II. J Oral Rehabil A. A tomographic study of mandibular condyle
2000;27:1013- 1023. postition in an asymptomatic population. J Prosthet
67. Keshvad A, Winstanley RB. An appraisal of the Dent 1985;53:706- 713.
literature on centric relation. Part I. J Oral Rehabil 85. Ren YF, Isberg A, Westesson P-L. Condyle posi
2000;27:823- 833. tion in the temporomandibular joint: comparison
68. Keshvad A, Winstanley RB. An appraisal of the lit between asymptomatic volunteers with normal
erature on centric relation. Part III. J Oral Rehabil disk position and patients with disk displacement.
2001;28:55- 63. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
69. Kerr DA, Ash M M , Millard HD. Oral Diagnosis. St. 1995;80:101- 107.
Louis, M O: Mosby, 1959:261- 262. 86. Turp JC, Alt KW, Vach W, Harbich K. Mandibular
70. The Academy of Prosthodontics. The Glossary of condyles and rami are asymmetric structures. Cran
Prosthodontic Terms, ed 8 (GPT-8). J Prosthet Dent io 1998;16:51- 56.
2005;94:10- 92. 87. JasineviciusTR, Pyle M A, Lalumandier JA, Nelson S,
71. Shore NA. Occlusal Equilibration and Temporoman Kohrs KJ, Turp JC et al. Asymmetry of the articular
dibular Joint Dysfunction. Philadelphia, PA: Lippin- eminence in dentate and partially edentulous popu
cott, 1959:218, 307. lations. Cranio 2006;24:85- 94.
72. Ramfjord SP. Dysfunctional temporomandibular joint 88. Woda A, Vigneron P, Kay D. Nonfunctional and
and muscle pain. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:353-374. functional occlusal contacts: a review of the litera
73. McNeill C. Fundamental treatment goals. In: McNeill ture. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:335- 341.
C (ed). Science and Practice of Occlusion. Chicago, 89. Ross B. Satisfactory occlusal relations for the indi
IL: Quintessence, 1997:306-322. vidual with a craniofacial anomaly. Int J Prosthodont
74. Ash M M Jr. Philosophy of occlusion: past and pres 2003;16(Suppl):74- 75, discussion 89- 90.
ent. Dent Clin North Am 1995;39:233- 255. 90. Posselt U. Physiology of Occlusion and Rehabilita
75. Ash M M , Nelson SJ. Wheeler's Dental Anatomy, tion. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis, 1968.
Physiology, and Occlusion, ed 8. Philadelphia, PA: 91. Reynolds JM . Occlusal wear facets. J Prosthet Dent
Saunders, 2003. 1970;24:367- 372.
76. Okeson JP (ed.) Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for As 92. Rieder CE. The prevalence and magnitude of man
sessment, Diagnosis, and M anagement, ed 4. Chi dibular displacement in a survey population. J Pros
cago, IL: Quintessence, 2008:171. thet Dent 1978;39:324- 329.
77. AgerbergG, Sandstrom R. Frequency of occlusal in 93. Klineberg I, Stohler CS. Study group report and dis
terferences: a clinical study in teenagers and young cussion. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(Suppl):89- 90.
adults. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:212- 217. 94. Lobbezoo F, van Seims M K, Naeije M . Masticatory
78. Minagi S, Watanabe H, Sato T, Tsuru H. The rela muscle pain and disordered jaw motor behaviour:
tionship between balancing-side occlusal contact literature review over the past decade. Arch Oral
patterns and temporomandibular joint sounds in Biol 2006;51:713- 720.
humans: proposition of the concept of balancing- 95. Obrez A, Turp JC. The effect of musculoskeletal fa
side protection. J Craniomandib Disord 1990;4: cial pain on registration of maxillomandibular rela
251- 256. tionships and treatment planning: a synthesis of the
79. Solnit A, Curnutte DC. Occlusal Correction: Princi literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:439^ W5.
ples and Practice. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1988. 96. Bell WE. Classification of TM disorders. In: Laskin
80. Au A, Klineberg I. The role of occlusal adjustment. D, Greenfield W, Gale E, Rugh J, Neff P, Ailing C et
In: Klineberg I, Jagger R (eds). Occlusion and Clini al. (eds). The President’s Conference on the Exami
cal Practice: An Evidence-based Approach. Edin nation, Diagnosis, and Management of Temporo
burgh: Wright, 2004:133- 138. mandibular Disorders. Chicago, IL: American Dental
81. Gesch D, Bernhardt O, Kirbschus A. Association of Association, 1983:24- 29.
malocclusion and functional occlusion with tem 97. Stohler CS. M anagement of dental occlusion.
poromandibular disorders (TM D) in adults: a sys In: Laskin DM , Greene CS, Hylander WL (eds).
tematic review of population-based studies. Quin TM Ds: An Evidence-based Approach to Diagnosis
tessence Int 2004;35:211- 221. and Treatment. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 2006:
82. Gesch D, Bernhardt O, Alte D, Kocher T, John U, 403- 411.
Hensel E. Malocclusions and clinical signs or sub 98. Michelotti A, Farella M , Gallo LM , Veltri A, Palla
jective symptoms of temporomandibular disorders S, M artina R. Effect of occlusal interference on
(TM D) in adults: results of the population-based habitual activity of human masseter. J Dent Res
Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). J Orofac 2005;84:644- 648.
Orthop 2004;65:88- 103. 99. Le Bell Y, Jamsa T, Korri S, Niemi PM , Alanen P. Ef
83. Blaschke DD, Blaschke TJ. Normal TM J bony fect of artificial occlusal interferences depends on
relationships in centric occlusion. J Dent Res previous experience of temporomandibular disor
1981;60:98- 104. ders. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:219- 222.
128. Turp JC, Schindler HJ, Pritsch , Rong Q. An- 144. Turp JC, Schindler HJ. Zum Zusammenhang zwis-
tero-posterior activity changes in the superficial chen Okklusion und Myoarthropathien: Einfiihrung
masseter muscle after exposure to experimental eines integrierenden neurobiologischen Modells.
pain. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:83- 91. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2003;113:964- 977.
129. Schindler HJ, Turp JC, Blaser R, Lenz J. Differen 145. Ramfjord SP, Ash M M . Reflections on the Michigan
tial activity patterns in the masseter muscle under occlusal splint. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:491- 500.
simulated clenching and grinding forces. J Oral 146. Rivera-Morales WC, Mohl ND. Relationship of oc
Rehabil 2005;32:552- 563. clusal vertical dimension to the health of the masti
130. Schindler HJ, Rues S, Turp JC, Lenz J. Heteroge catory system. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:547- 553.
neous activation of the medial pterygoid mus 147. Palla S. The vertical dimension: a prosthodontist's
cle during simulated clenching. Arch Oral Biol perspective. In: M cNamara JA Jr (ed). The Enigma
2006;51:498- 504. of the Vertical Dimension. Ann Arbor, M l: Cen
131. Farella M , Palumbo A, Milani S, Avecone S, Gallo ter for Human Growth and Development, 2000:
LM , Michelotti A. Synergist coactivation and sub 75- 101.
stitution pattern of the human masseter and tem 148. Woda A, Piochon P, Palla S. Regulation of man
poralis muscles during sustained static contrac dibular postures: mechanisms and clinical implica
tions. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:190- 197. tions. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001;12:166- 178.
132. Svensson P, Sessle B. Orofacial pain. In: Miles TS, 149. Hagg GM . Static work and myalgia: a new ex
Nauntofte B, Svensson P (eds). Clinical Oral Physi planation model. In: Andersson PA, Hobart DJ,
ology. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 2004:93- 139. Danoff JV (eds). Electromyographical Kinesiology.
133. Schindler HJ, Rong Q, Spiefb WEL. Der Einfluss Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1991:141- 144.
von Aufbissschienen auf das Rekrutierungsmus- 150. Zennaro D, Laubli T, Krebs D, Krueger H, Klipstein
ter des Musculus temporalis. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z A. Trapezius muscle motor unit activity in symp
2000;55:575- 581. tomatic participants during finger tapping using
134. Chu SA, Suvinen Tl, Clement JG, Reade PC. The properly and improperly adjusted desks. Hum Fac
effect of interocclusal appliances on temporoman tors 2004;46:252- 266.
dibular joints as assessed by 3D reconstruction of 151. Staal JB, de Bie RA, Hendriks EJM . Aetiology
M RI scans. Aust Dent J 2001 ;46:18- 23. and management of work-related upper ex
135. Ettlin DA, M ang H, Colombo V, Palla S, Gallo LM . tremity disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
Stereometric assessment of TM J space variation by 2007;21:123- 133.
occlusal splints. J Dent Res 2008;87:877- 881. 152. Visser B, van JH. Pathophysiology of upper
136. Demling A, Fauska K, Ismail F, Stiesch M . A com extremity muscle disorders. J Electromyogr Kine-
parison of change in condylar position in asymp siol 2006;16:1- 16.
tomatic volunteers utilizing a stabilization and a 153. Chen CY, Palla S, Erni S, Sieber M , Gallo LM . Non
pivot appliance. Cranio 2009;27:54- 61. functional tooth contact in healthy controls and
137. van der Glas HW, Buchner R, van Grootel RJ. patients with myogenous facial pain. J Orofac Pain
Vergelijking tussen behandelingsvormen bij myo- 2007;21:185- 193.
gene temporomandibulaire dysfunctie. Ned Tijd- 154. Clark GT, Minakuchi H. Oral appliances. In: Laskin
schr Tandheelkd 2000;107:505- 512. DM , Greene CS, Hylander W L (eds). TM Ds: An
138. Kreiner M , Betancor E, Clark GT. Occlusal stabili Evidence-based Approach to Diagnosis and Treat
zation appliances: evidence of their efficacy. J Am ment. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 2006:377- 390.
Dent Assoc 2001;132:770- 777. 155. Clark GT. Occlusal Therapy: Occlusal Appliances.
139. Al-Ani M Z, Davies SJ, Gray RJM , Sloan P, Glenny In: Laskin D, Greenfield W, Gale E, Rugh J, Neff
AM . Stabilisation splint therapy for temporoman P, Ailing C et al. (eds). The President's Conference
dibular pain dysfunction syndrome. Cochrane Da on the Examination, Diagnosis and Management
tabase Syst Rev 2004;lssue 1:CD002778. of Temporomandibular Disorders. Chicago, IL:
140. Forssell H, Kalso E. Application of principles of American Dental Association, 1983:137- 146.
evidence-based medicine to occlusal treatment for 156. Svensson P, Romaniello A, Wang K, Arendt-Niels
temporomandibular disorders: are there lessons to en L, Sessle BJ. One hour of tongue-task training
be learned? J Orofac Pain 2004;18:9- 22. is associated with plasticity in corticomotor control
141. Turp JC, Komine F, Hugger A. Efficacy of stabiliza of the human tongue musculature. Exp Brain Res
tion splints for the management of patients with 2006;173:165- 173.
masticatory muscle pain: a qualitative systematic 157. Duchateau J, Semmler JG, Enoka RM . Training ad
review. Clin Oral Invest 2004;8:179- 194. aptations in the behavior of human motor units.
142. Raphael KG, Marbach JJ. Widespread pain and the J Appl Physiol 2006;101:1766- 1775.
effectiveness of oral splints in myofascial face pain. 158. Lotze M , Braun C, Birbaumer N, Anders S, Cohen
J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:305- 316. LG. M otor learning elicited by voluntary drive.
143. Van Eijden TM GV, Blanksma NG, Brugman P. Brain 2003;126:866- 872.
Amplitude and timing of EM G activity in the hu 159. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL. Functions of the
man masseter muscle during selected motor tasks. mirror neuron system: implications for neuroreha
J Dent Res 1993;72:599- 606. bilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol 2006;19:55- 63.
, ,
,
, ,
.
, , ,
. , ,
.8
, ,
,
. , ,9
.10
,
,
,
.11
. ,
,
.12
,
« » ,
, ,
, .
, ,
, 13 .14
.1-7 ,
, , ,
,
. (visual analog
scale, VAS) 2-3 ( 10-
). (
, /
, )
, .15 0,56, . .
, 56 %
.16 ,
-
.
.
,
.
,
-
.
- ,
, ,
, -
,
.1617 .24-28
- ,
.18 ,
- , -
,
. ,
.1920
« ,
» , ,
.
,21
1722
.
:
. ,
-
.
,
, :
.29-33
. -
,
( ) .
. , ,
,
, - -
, .
.21'32 •
,
. .
, ,
( ) , , ,
, , , ,
, . ,
.22'32 , , ,
- . .
« », .36
« », •
.
, (
, ).37
, , « »
.1-7
, ,
,
(« .
»),
.34 ,
,35 ,
, , , ,
,
-
: .
M oerman,39 - ,
, . .
,
.
.41'42 ,
.39 ,
( ) .18
( ).
.
,
,
,
.43
. : ,
,
, .18 ,
- .
, 44 ,
,
. , ( , )
, -
.
, , ,
.40 ,
.
- -
.
, , /
(
/
, (
). -
.
( ,
( , ,
) )
, .
,
: , ,
( ) - .
. .
, ,
.
.
,
,
, 40 .
, ( )
. Schwartz .49
1958 ,
.
1960-1970- .
,
( , )
Laskin, Greene .,
.
- ( 50
51 ),
- ,
,
« ,52
».
, , ,53
,54
« ».
, .55
. ,
, ,
, ,
« »
, « »
, .
.
(. . )
. ,
.68 ,
. , , ,
.6970 ,
,
,
.59-60
,71-73
,
. ,
,74 - ,
.
, ,
,
« » .
. ,
, ,75-79 Ekberg .
.61-66 Beecher,66 -
, , ,
(
.78-83
), Dao
, Lavigne84
. , ,
.
, « »
, ( « ») « ».
. , ,
,
,
.
. ,
1990- .1 ,
.
, 1975 .
Onishi.2
1980- 1990- . ,
-
. .4 «
, » Dorrit Nitzan.1
,
,
. ,
,
.
3(
.1
). ,
:
•
, -
;
- •
. ( -
);
• ;
. 26-1. . 26-2.
,
• ;
• , ,
; .
• ,
( , ,
, ). , (Holmlund).
,
, -
, .
. ,
,
,
. ( . 26-2).
, 10-12
, ,6-6 2-3 ,
7 .8-12
-
.
. ,
,
2
1 , . .
.
,
, . 26-1. ,
, .
. , ,
. 19-
.13
, ,
( ( . 26-5).
).
, ( . 26-6).
,
2 ( . 26-3). ,
(2 ) .
19-
, ( . 26-4). ( . 26-7) .
( . 26-8).
,
,
, . ( . 26-9)
- , 500
. ( .
)
300
( ) 14 ( . 26-1 26-1 ).
. ,
. 26-6. - . 26-7.
. 26-8. . 26-9.
-
. 26-10 26- . ,
.17 ,
,
. , - ,
,
, , - ,
. 26-11.
( 26-1).
.
,
,
,
( . 26-11). -
-
, ( / )( 26-2).
.915
,
5 . ,
,
, ( ) -
.12
26-2.
(
), /
26-1.
. +
.
•
• .
• +
Ilia. +
• . +
• . +
- ; -
; -
( ).
( . 5) ( ) .
,
,
. .
.
.23-26
.1819
. ,
.
. , .10-12'27
( .
6).
,
,
.
.28'29
( ,
, ), -
,
2.
.
. ,
, ,
.
( ) ,
.1820-22 .
,
.30
.833 .
,
, .
.
,
.
.34
,
,
.
, .
,
,
, .
,
, ,
. ,
,
. -
.
.
.39
,
.
. ,
-
. ,
.35'36
-
10-12 .
,
.89
,
-
.8 ,
-
5 .12
.
,
.3738 , -
, ,
.
.12
,
.
- ,
.
,
28. Gynther G, Holmlund A. Efficacy of arthroscopic 34. Guarda-Nardini L, Manfredini D, Ferronato G. To
lysis and lavage in patients with temporomandibu tal temporomandibular joint replacement: a clinical
lar joint symptoms associated with generalized os case with a proposal for post-surgical rehabilitation.
teoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. J Oral M axillofac J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2008;36:403- 409.
Surg 1998;56:147- 151. 35. Nitzan DW, Nitzan U, Dan P, Yedgar S. The role of
29. Trieger N, Hoffman CH, Rodriguez E. The effect of hyaluronic acid in protecting surface-active phos
arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint in pholipids from lysis by exogenous phospholipase
patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Oral M axillofac A2. Reumatology 2001 ;40:336- 340.
Surg 1999;57:537- 540. 36. Nitzan DW, Kreiner B, Zeltser B. TM J lubrification
30. Yun PY, Kim YK. The role of facial trauma as a possi system: its effect on the joint function, dysfunction,
ble etiologic factor in temporomandibular joint dis and treatment approach. Compend Contin Educ
order. J Oral M axillofac Surg 2005;63:1576- 1583. Dent 2004;25:437- 444.
31. Alpaslan C, Bilgihan A, Alpaslan GH, Guner B, 37. Altman R, M oskowitz R. Intra-articular hyaluronic
Ozgiir Yis M , D. Effect of arthrocentesis and acid (hyalgan) in the treatment of patients with
sodium hyaluronate injection on nitrite, nitrate, and osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized clinical
thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance levels in the trial. J Rheumatol 1998;25:2203- 2212.
synovial fluid. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral 38. Kolarz G, Kotz R, Hochmayer I. Long-term benefits
Radiol Endod 2000;89:686- 690. and repeated treatment cycles of intraarticular hy
32. Kaneyama K, Segami N, Sato J, Fujimura K, Nagao aluronic acid (hyalgan) in patients with osteoarthritis
T, Yoshimura H. Prognostic factors in arthrocente of the knee. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2003;32:310-
sis of the temporomandibular joint: comparison of 319.
bradykinin, leukotriene B4, prostaglandin E2, and 39. Carroll , Smith K, Jakubowski J. Extradural hae-
substance P level in synovial fluid between success matoma following temporomandibular joint arthro
ful and unsuccessful cases. J Oral M axillofac Surg centesis and lavage. Br J Neurosurg 2000;14:152-
2007;65:242- 247. 154.
33. Yoda T, Imai H, Shinjyo Y, Sakamoto I, Abe M , Eno-
moto S. Effect of arthrocentesis on TM J disturbance
of mouth closure with loud clicking: a preliminary
study. Cranio 2002;20:18- 22.
-
( ) , .
- ,
( )
. ,
.
,
,
. .
,
. ,
.1
,
« »
,
. ,
.3
XX ,
.2 , 1970- .
-
, ,
. , .45
,
, ,67 ,
. 27-1. . . . .
.
-
.49 ( ),
1975 .,10 .16
( . 27-1). ,
, .
,
,
." 12 16 ( . 27-2).
1980- .
,
.13 .
,
,
. 1990- .
,
-
.
.14 , ,
.
.
, 10 % -
.16
,
-
. . ,
, , , ,
,
- ,
. .
, -
,
, .
- ,
-
,
.
, .
- - ,
.917
,
,
. , ,
,
( . 27-3).9,16
. 27-3. . 27-4.
. 2
.
, -
.
.
18
.
.
, . ,
,
.
- .18
.16
,
, ,
. .
, , ,
.1819
.15
,
.17
,
:
• ( );
• ( ,
);
• ( );
• ( ,
).
:
• ;
• ;
• .
:
•
. 27- 5. ;
•
,
.
:
6 - ;
-
. ;
-
;
-
.
:
•
( 27-1). 1994 . ;
•
Dolwick Dim itroulis9
;
•
.
,
,
;
•
( . 27-4), -
( . 27-5).
,
,20 .
, ,917
,
,
,
, .2
,
.
,
.17
, .9
,
.
,
. ,
,
, .17
, ,
, ,
. , -
, ,
. .
-
,
,
,
, .1819
24 ,
( . 27-10).
.
( . 27-11) ,
, -
( . 27-6). .
,
( . 27-7 27-8), ,
.21 .16
- , ,21 ,
,
.
.
,
.
, . ,
,
( 5-0) ( . 27-9), , ,
.
.
. 27-12.
.929
,
.30
.916
( . 27-12)
, ,31-33 . .
.22 ( . 27-13).
,
,
.22-26 , 20-
,34-38 ,
- ,
, .2226 ,
.39^ 1
10 27
-
,
, , .
- (Teflon-proplast)
.12'1428 (Silastic),
,
.13-42
,
,
,
. 27-14. . -
.
. -
-
2
.19'43
.47 Dimitroulis48
,
,44
.45 .19
-
,46
, ,
.19 .49
,
,
,
. 27-15.
.
( ; Lorenz)
.
,
( ; Biom et )
.
,
. .4360 -
,
-
,
, .
. -
,
,
( . 27-15). ,
.
.51 ,
.
,
,
.
.
,
, - .
( . 27-14),
,
:
, .43
• :
- ;
8-10 ,
- ;
.
•
,
;
, 40-50 ,
• ;
•
-
.
.
:
,
•
,
;
• :
,
- ;
- , ;
• .
. ,
:
• ;
• ;
-
• :
, ,
- ;
,- ,
- .
• ( ):
,
- ;
- ;
.
- .
:
•
;
•
;
• -
.
, ,
.52 ,
,
( 27-2).54
,
, Guarda-
Nardini .53 , . ,
,
.
-
, .
.
,
,
1. Al-Belasy FA, Dolwick MF. Arthrocentesis for the
. treatment of temporomandibular joint closed
lock. A review article. Int J Oral M axillofac Surg
, 2007;36:773- 782.
2. Dimitroulis G. Temporomandibular disorders: a clin
ical update. Brit Med J 1998;317:190- 194.
, 3. Merrill RG. Historical perspectives and comparisons
. of temporomandibular joint surgery for internal de
rangements and arthropathy. J Craniomandibular
Pract 1986;4:74- 85.
4. Dolwick MF, Katzberg RW, Helms CA. Internal de
rangement of the temporomandibular joint: fact or
, fiction? J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:415- 418.
. 5. Farrar WB. Diagnosis and treatment of anterior
dislocation of articular disc. N Y J Dent 1971 ;41:
348- 351.
, 6. Dolwick MF, Nitzan DW. TM J disk surgery: 8-year
, follow-up evaluation. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir
. 1990;35:162- 167.
7. Dolwick MF, Nitzan DW. The role of disc reposi
tioning su rgery fo r internal derangements o f the
temporomandibular joint. Oral M axillofac Surg Clin
North Am 1994;6:271- 275.
8. M cCarty W L, Farrar WB. Surgery for internal de
rangement of the temporomandibular joint. 1 Pros
thet Dent 1979;42:191- 196.
9. Dolwick MF, Dimitroulis G. Is there a role for tem
poromandibular joint surgery? Brit J Oral M axillofac
Surg 1994;32:307- 313.
10. Onishi M . Arthroscopy of the temporomandibular
, joint [Japanese]. J Jpn Stomat 1975;42:207- 212.
11. Dimitroulis G. A review of 56 cases of chronic closed
lock treated with temporomandibular joint arthros
copy. J Oral M axillofac Surg 2002;60:519- 524.
. ,
12. Holmlund AB, Gynther GW, Axelsson S. Efficacy of
, arthroscopic lysis and lavage in patients with chron
ic locking of the temporomandibular joint. Int J Oral
, M axillofac Surg 1994;23:262- 265.
13. Kaplan PA, HK, Williams SM . Erosive arthritis of
the temporomandibular joint caused by Teflon-Pro-
. plast implants: plain film features. Am J Roentgenol
1988;151:337- 340.
, 14. Nitzan DW, Samson B, Better H. Long-term out
come of arthrocentesis for sudden-onset, persis
, tent, severe closed lock of the temporomandibular
. , joint. J Oral M axillofac Surg 1997;55:151- 157.
15. Larheim . Role of magnetic resonance imaging
in the clinical diagnosis of the temporomandibular
joint. Cells Tissues Organs 2005;180:6- 21.
. 16. Dolwick MF, Sanders B. TMJ Internal Derangement and
- Arthrosis - Surgical Atlas. St. Louis, M O: Mosby, 1985.
52. Mercuri LG. The use of alloplastic prostheses for 54. Vallerand WP, Dolwick MF. Complications of tem
temporomandibular joint reconstruction. J Oral poromandibular joint surgery. Oral M axillofac Surg
M axillofac Surg 2000;58:70- 75. Clin North Am 1990;2:481- 488.
53. Guarda-Nardini L, Manfredini D, Ferronato G. Tem
poromandibular joint total replacement prosthesis:
current knowledge and considerations for the fu
ture. Int J Oral M axillofac Surg 2008;37:103- 110.
.23
-
( ) -
(Costen) 1934 .1 . , ,
,
,
- .
( ).
, .
,
,
. . ,«
» ,
,
, -
, ,
.4-6
. ,
,
, ,
. 1970- . .7
, ,
,
20 ,
. ,
, .” ,
, 5% ,
. ,
,
:
•
( .16
) ?
,
?
• . ,
? ,
•
.17'18
? ,
• , , ,
, ,
, ,
? .19
• ,
.20
? ,
,
.18
,
( ) ?
(
).2122
? ,
, .
.2324 ,
,8-12 ,
, ,
- ,
.13'14 8-18 % ,
Witter .,15 , ,
. Bergendahl M agnusson27
6-9-
, , ,
, .30-32
78 % ,
,
(Di = 0 1). Hammad .28 .
20 ,
,
. .
,
.
. , •
.
,
:
•
, . ,
. .
• ,
.33
.
,
?
, .
• , ,
,
.
.34
.29 ,
• ,
,
.35
,
.13 , .
.
. ,
, ,
( ,
. ,
), , 25 % ,
, ,
,
.
.
,
, ,
.36
.
. •
XX
(
,
)
. . ,
43 %
.
« •
» . ,
, ,
.37
.
, , ,
, , ,
.
,
.40
.38'39
: ,
•
.
,
-
. .
• ,
(
)
,
.
• ,
, .
-
, (
( ) , ) .
.41 ( ,
• ,
. .),
.
. ,
.43
. .
, ,
,
,
, ,
( [ ] > 10).41 .
• .
,
,
, , .44
.
•
.45 Luder,46
.
. ,
.
.47
.
.
,
,
.42
.
,
?
, ,
( ),
( ) ,
.
,
. , ,
,
(
, , ).
.4849
, .
:
•
,
. ,
,
.
- ?
,
. .
•
,
, ,
.
,
.
• .60
,
,
,
,
.
.
,
.
• ,
,
.51
,
,
.
• .
,
. .62-64
.55 .
, •
,
,
, .
• .
.53'5657
,
,
.61
, •
( )
.
,
, , ,
, .62-63
.58
, .
- ,
.
, ,
, ?
.5960
, ,
, ,
, .
- - ,
( . 7).
, ,
- , , .
,
.56 -
. ,
:
• , , ,
,
, ,
, .64
.65
.
,
. ( .
)
,
,
,
.66 45 , 20-
( . 28-1-28-4)
.
,
• 45 ,
,
, •
.67 •
,
•
.
, • :
-
.
, - :
28
,
. Raustia .68
.
•
- .
.
,
, ,
. • , ,
•
.
4
. , , • ;
. 28-2.
. 28- 28- .
. 28-4. 17
• : 37 , 5
• ,
•
• :
,
• : ,
• : ,
. ,
• : 3- 4
;
. 28-5 28-5 .
18
, ,
• +7 . 1
, • +18 . - ,
• +10 .
; 45
, -
.
;
.
18- • (
)
( •
) ,
,
.
. •
, •
. • :
( . 28-5-28-8)
• ,
• 40 , , , ,
,
(Dentatus)
• (. .
• )
• •
2
• :
- •
, (1 )
- •
- •
48 , (
)
51. Ainamo A. The continuous eruption of the teeth in 61. Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael
adult man and its influence on the width of the ana K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview
tomical attached gingiva. Doctoral thesis. Helsinki: for clinicians. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:476- 494.
University of Helsinki, 1977. 62. Carlsson GE, Egermark I, Magnusson T. Predic
52. Ramfjord SP, Blankenship JR. Increased verti tors of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular
cal dimension in adult monkeys. J Prosthet Dent disorders: A 20-year follow-up study from child
1981;45:78- 83. hood to adulthood. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:
53. De Boever JA, Adriaens PA, Seynhave T. Raising the 180-185.
vertical dimension of occlusion with fixed bridges 63. Seligman DA, Pullinger AG. Dental attrition models
[abstract], J Dent Res 1989;68:902. predicting temporomandibular joint disease or mas
54. Gross M , Ormianer Z. A preliminary study on the ticatory muscle pain versus asymptomatic controls.
effect of occlusal vertical dimension increase on J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:789- 799.
mandibular rest position. Int J Prosthodont 1994;3: 64. Dervis E. Changes in temporomandibular disorders
216- 221. after treatment with new complete dentures. J Oral
55. Hellsing G. Functional adaptation to changes in ver Rehabil 2004;31:320- 326.
tical dimension. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:867- 870. 65. Lambardakis L, Kazakis HC. Changes in the man
56. Dahl B, 0ilo G. Wear of teeth and restorative ma dibular rest position after removal of remain
terials. In: Owall B, Kayser AF, Carlsson GE (eds). ing teeth and the insertion of complete dentures.
Prosthodontics: Principles and M anagement Strate J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:74- 77.
gies. London: M osby-Wolfe, 1996:187- 200. 66. Palla S. Occlusal considerations in complete dentures.
57. Rivera-Morales W C, Mohl ND. Relationship of oc In: McNeill C (ed). Science and Practice of Occlusion.
clusal vertical dimension to the health of the masti Chicago, IL: Q u in t essen ce, 1997:457-467.
catory system. J Prosthet Dent 1991 ;65:547- 553. 67. Amorim VC, Lagana DC, De Paula E, Zanetti A.
58. Mizrahi B. The Dahl principle: creating space and Analysis of the condyle/ fossa relationship before
improving the biomechanical prognosis of anterior and after prosthetic rehabilitation with maxillary
crowns. Quintessence Int 2006;37:245- 251. complete dentures and mandibular removable par
59. Svensson P, Jadidi F, Arim aT, Baad-Hansen L, Sessle tial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:508- 514.
BJ. Relationships between craniofacial pain and 68. Raustia AM , Peltola M , Salonen M AM . Influence
bruxism. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:524- 547. of complete denture renewal on craniomandibular
60. Chen CY, Palla S, Erni S, Sieber M , Gallo LM . Non disorders: a 1-year follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil
functional tooth contact in healthy controls and 1997;24:30.
patients with myogenous facial pain. J Orofac Pain
2007;21:185- 193.
-
( ) , .
. ,
.
. ,
, .
,
.
:
.
1987 . 1930- .
(Brimm v. M alloy).1
,
, 16- , .23
. Brodie,2'3
Perry,45 M oyers,6 Thom pson7"9 Ricketts.10
« - »
.
. 1970- .
, (Ronald . Roth),1112
- ( ), ,
,
. ,
. ,
( ) .
.11' 15
.35-42
,
(Angle)16'17 (And rews),18 ,
. ,
.
,
( ). .43
,
,
,
( ) .
. , ,
.
,
, ,
.
.11'12 ,
,
( )
.18-26 , ,
,
,
,
.22 .
, -
,
.22
, -
, .26-35 ,
,
.23 , .44^16 Clark
, Evans,47
. ,
.
,44 , , ,
, ,
. , ,
- , . ,
. ,
M cNamara ,49 ,
,
, .44
.
,
.
, .
-
, .44
,
,
,
.44 ,
100
.
50 . - .
, ,
- -
( . ,
).53 ,
« .
» . ,
Johnston , ,
.
, ,
, - ,
.64 : « ,
, ,
.27"30'58
. ,
,
».54
( )
. ,
4 , , -
, -
.43 : « 30
- .
,
».55 , -
, .
,
,
- , .
, , , ,
.53 ,
,
.4356 ,
,
, ,
, , , .60
, 29-1.
.23'24'53'57~53
, ,
-
, . , ,
• • ( )
, ,
• ?
• « »
?
• , - •
( )
?
• •
?
•
• , ?
•
?
• •
?
• •
, , ,
?
•
• ? ,
?
•
,
•
.
,
( 29-2).2256 ,
•
( 29-3).22
•
,
.22
•
, ?
•
,
, .5360 ,
, ?
• ?
29- 3. ,
.
-
1.
,
,
2.
,
.
3.
,
(
4.
) ,
5.
, ,
,
6. ,
. ,
,
,
(
.61-63 ,
), ,
,
.
7. ,
.23'2633'36'49
.
,
, : -
,
, , , .
. , ,
.6566 I
- , II .
,
,
,
. .
.
,
,
- .
-
- (
)
( ,
).
, ( II),
. , ,
.66
.61-64
.
( )
. .68-70
Watt,69 ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
.67 ,
,
,
.
, , ,
-
.
. , ,
,
- -
.
.68'7071 ,
,7273
( , .
) , ,
,
, (
, , ).
,
, ,
.
.
20-30
.
,74
,3132 , ,
. .
,
,
. , , 30 %
-
( ) .57'7779'80
, ,
.
12, ,
. .
, ,
,
.75 (
).
.76 ,
.81-83 ,
,
,
.53 ,
, ,
.8486
.74-77 ,
,
,
.78
, .86 ,
- , . .
( ),
,
. .84 , ,
,
, -
.84'86
- . .
.87-88 .94^98 ,
. ,
, .77'79'86
.
,
« » , .
. , ,
87.
,
,
,
- , ,
.9091 -
( )
.
,
, ,
,
.9293 ,
, .99-101
, ,
. ,
, , -
, , ,
, ,
.86-86
.101
, ,
.6488'94 ,
II
, ,
,
. , .
.102
.105'106
,
. ,
.
,
,
. Greene Laskin,
,
.
.70
. ,
-
-
- ,
, , « ».22'56'64,107'108
,
,
,
.102
. ,
. , .2256'64
,
(
, ,
,
)
-
(
)
.103 ,
, -
, .19'25'109-112 ,
.104
.
,
,
. .
.
,
.
,
(
, )
( ,
).
,
.
,
,
,
, , ,
, .
, - .
.
,
.63
,
.
,
,
( . 29-1 29-1 ).
( -
) .
.
, ,
, ,
( ,
. -115 , . .).
, -
.63
( ,
),
.
.
,
.116'117 ,
. 29-1 29-1 . , -
. 29-2 29-2 . .
. ,
,
(
)( . 29-2 29-2 ).
.
, ,
,
, .
.63 ,
, -
.
, ,
,
, ( )
,
. ,
. ( )
, .120
20-30 ,
.
, .121-125
.3132
, ,
( )
« -
»
.
. ,
, .
( 29-4). ,
. .
,
,
, ,22'56'62'67'109118 .
,
( ; transcutaneous nerve .
stimulation, TEN S),
, ,
. .
,
( ; Dr. ,
Michael Powers, SonicTechnology),
.119 , .
, , , ,
, .
,
.
,
( ) ( )
29-4.
• : ( , );
- , , ;
, , ; ;
. ;
- .
, . •
( ( ):
.
.) .
• :
,
.
( , .
,
, .
).
,
- « ». II.
• : , • :
( 20 (
3-4 ); )
. ,
.
. : , , ,
• ( ): ,
, ,
,
, . .
, , ,
.
,
; .
, .
40. Carlton KL, Nanda RS. Prospective study of posttreat 56. Griffiths RH. Report of the president’s conference
ment changes in the temporomandibular joint. Am J on the examination, diagnosis, and management
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:486- 490. of temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc
41. Luppanapornlap S, Johnston LE Jr. The effects 1983;106:75- 77.
of premolar extraction: A long-term comparison 57. Kircos LT, Ortendahl DA, Arakawa M . Magnetic reso
of outcomes in "clear-cut" nonextraction and nance imaging of the TM J disc in asymptomatic vol
extraction class II patients. The Angle Orthod unteers. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:852-853.
1993;63:257- 272. 58. Bean LR, Thomas CA. Significance of condylar posi
42. Beattie JR, Paquette DE, Johnston LE Jr. The func tions in patients with temporomandibular disorders.
tional impact of extraction and nonextraction J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:76- 77.
treatments: a long-term comparison in patients 59. Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ. The impact of the Ameri
with "borderline", equally susceptible Class II can Dental Association's guidelines for the man
malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop agement of temporomandibular disorders on orth
1994;105:444- 449. odontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
43. National Institutes of Health Technology Assess 1983;83:518- 522.
ment Conference Statement. Management of 60. Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S. Articulators in ortho
temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc dontics: an evidence-based perspective. Am J Or
1996;127:1595- 1606. thod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:299- 308.
44. Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S, Sciote J. A contem 61. Klasser GD, Greene CS. Predoctoral teaching of
porary and evidence-based view of canine pro temporomandibular disorders: survery of U.S.
tected occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc
2007;132:90- 102. 2007;138:231- 237.
45. Rinchuse DJ, Sassouni V. An evaluation of eccentric 62. Turp JC, Greene CS, Strub JR. Dental occlusion: a
occlusal contacts in orthodontically treated subjects. critical reflection on past, present and future con
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1982;82:251- cepts. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:446- 453.
256. 63. Greene CS. Orthodontists and TM D. Orthodontic
46. Tipton RT, Rinchuse DJ. The relationship between Products 2007;14:12.
static occlusion and functional occlusion in a dental 64. Klasser GD, Greene CS. Role of oral appliances in the
school population. Angle Orthod 1991;61:57- 66. management of sleep bruxism and temporomandib
47. Clark JR, Evans RD. Functional occlusion - I . A re ular disorders. Alpha Omegan 2007;100:111- 119.
view. J Orthod 2001 ;28:76- 81. 65. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria
48. Cordary FE. Centric relation treatment and articu for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria,
lator mountings in orthodontics. Angle Orthod examinations and specifications, critique. J Crani
1996;66:153- 158. omandib Disord 1992;6:301- 355.
49. M cNamara JA, Seligman DA, Okeson JA. Occlu 66. Okeson JP. The classification of orofacial pain. Oral
sion, orthodontic treatment, temporomandibular Maxillofacial Surg Clin North Am 2008;20:135- 144.
disorders: a review. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:73- 90. 67. Greene CS. The etiology of temporomandibular
50. Woda A, Vigneron P, Kay D. Non-functional and disorders: implications for treatment. J Orofac Pain
functional occlusal contacts: a review of the litera 2001;15:93- 105.
ture. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:335- 341. 68. Gross A, Gale EN. A prevalence study of the clinical
51. Lopez-Gavito G, Wallen TR, Little RM , Joonedeph signs associated with mandibular dysfunction. J Am
DR. Anterior open-bite malocclusion: a longitudinal Dent Assoc 1983;107:932- 936.
ten-year postretention evaluation of orthodontically 69. Watt DM . Temporomandibular joint sounds. J Dent
treated patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1980;8:119- 127.
1985;87:175- 186. 70. Greene CS, Laskin DM. Long-term status of TM D
52. van't Spijker A, Kreulen CM , Creugers NHJ. At clicking in patients with myofascial pain and dys
trition, occlusion, (dys)function, and interven function. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:461- 465.
tion: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 71. Greene CS, Laskin DM . Long-term evaluation of
2007;18:117- 126. treatment for myofascial pain-dysfunction analysis.
53. Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S. Centric relation: a his J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:235- 238.
torical and contemporary orthodontic perspective. 72. Vincent SD, Lilly GE. Incidence and characterization
J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:494- 501. of temporomandibular joint sounds in adults. J Am
54. Johnston LE Jr. Fear and loathing in orthodontics: Dent Assoc 1988;116:203- 206.
notes on the death of theory. In: Carlson DS, Fer 73. Walker RV, Kalamchi SA. Surgical technique for
rara AM (eds). Craniofacial growth theory and orth the management of internal derangement of the
odontic treatment. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Center for temporomandibular joint. J Oral M axillofac Surg
Human Growth and Development, University of 1987;45:200- 205.
M ichigan, 1990:75- 91.
55. Keim RG. Centric Shangri-la. J Clin Orthod 2003;
37:349- 350.
104. Matteson SR, Proffit WR, Terry , Staab EV, 115. Seligman DA, Pullinger AG. The role of functional
Burkes EJ, Hill C. Bone scanning with 99m tech occlusal relationships in temporomandibular dis
netium phosphate to assess condylar hyperpla orders: a review. J Craniomandib Disord 1991 ;5:
sia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 60: 265- 279.
356- 367. 116. Rilo B, da Silva JL, M ora M J, Cadarso-Swarez C,
105. Lippold C, Kruse-Losler B, Danesh G, Joos U, Santana U. Midline shift and lateral guidance an
M eyer U. Treatment of hemimandibular hyperpla gle in adults with unilateral posterior crossbite. Am
sia: the biological basis of condylectomy. Br J Oral J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:804- 808.
Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:353- 360. 117. Kilic N, Kiki A. Condylar asymmetry in unilateral
106. Wolford LM, Mehra P, Reiche-Fischel O, Morales- posterior crossbite patients. Am J Orthod Dento
Ryan CA, Garcia-Morales P. Efficacy of high con facial Orthop 2008;133:382- 387.
dylectomy for management of condylar hyperpla 118. Dimitroulis, G. Fortnightly review: temporo
sia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121: mandibular disorders: a clinical update. BMJ
136-151. 1998;317:190- 194.
107. Moloney F, Howard JA. Internal derangements of 119. Marie SS, Powers M , Sheridan JJ. Vibratory
the temporomandibular joint: anterior reposition stimulation as a method of reducing pain after
ing splint therapy. Aust Dent J 1986;31:30- 39. orthodontic appliance adjustment. J Clin Orthod
108. Clark GT. The TM J repositioning appliance: a tech 2003;37:205- 208.
nique for construction, insertion, and adjustment. 120. Gatchel RJ, Stowell AW, Wildenstein L, Riggs
J Craniomandibular Pract 1986;4:37- 46. R, Ellis E III. Efficacy of an early intervention for
109. Clark GT. Classification, causation, and treat patients with acute temporomandibular disorder-
ment of masticatory myogenous pain and dys related pain. J Am D en t Assoc 2006;137:
function. Oral Maxiofacial Surg Clin North Am 339- 347.
2008;20:145- 157. 121. Turk D, Zaki H, Rudy T. Effects of intraoral appli
110. Forssell H, Kalso E, Koskela P, Vehmanen R, ance and biofeedback/ stress management alone
Puukka P, Alanen P. Occlusal treatments in tem and in combination in treating pain and depres
poromandibular disorders: a qualitative system sion in TM D patients. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:
atic review of randomized controlled trials. Pain 158-164.
1999;83:549- 560. 122. Turk DC, Rudy , Kubinski JA, Zake HS, Greco
111. Koh H, Robinson PG. Occlusal adjustment for CM . Dysfunctional patients with temporoman
treating and preventing temporomandibular joint dibular disorders: evaluating the efficacy of a
disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:287- 292. tailored treatment protocol. J Consult Clin Psychol
112. Bakke M . Jaw muscle disorders. In: Klineberg I, 1996;64:139- 146.
Jagger R (eds). Occlusion and Clinical Practice: 123. Rudy , Turk DC, Kubinski JA, Zaki HS. Differ
An Evidence-based Approach. London: Wright, ential treatment response of TM D patients as
2004:81. a function of psychological characteristics. Pain
113. Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Orthodontics, occlusion, 1995;61:103- 112.
and temporomandibular disorders. In: McNamara 124. Greco CM , Rudy , Turk DC, Andrew H, Zaki HS.
JA Jr, Brudon W L. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Traumatic onset of temporomandibular disorders:
Orthopedics. Ann Arbor, M l: Needham Press, positive effects of a standardized conservative
2001:519- 543. treatment program. Clin J Pain 1997;13:337- 347.
114. Pellizoni SEP, Salioni M AC, Juliano Y, Guimaraes 125. Turk DC. Psychosocial and behavioral assessment of
AS, Alonso LG. Temporomandibular joint disc po patients with temporomandibular disorders: diagnos
sition and configuration in children with functional tic and treatment implication. Oral Surg Oral Med
unilateral posterior crossbite: a magnetic resonance Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:65-71.
imaging evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 2006;129:785- 793.
20 %
.
,
.1 ,
, -
. 8 %
. .
( )
( ).2 .6 ,
- ,
. , .7
,
( ,
, ,
)
, .
, ,
.3 Winocur .45 ,
, , -
,
,
. , .
,
,
, . . ,
. .
. , , -
,
. . . ,
, ,
.8
.9 ,
,
.
, , De Leeuw,1
, .9 ,
Lavigne .,9
, ,
.
, ,
, , ,
. .
,
( ) ,
,
, .10
, -
. 30-8. 1
. 30-9.
,
, .111
, -
. . ,
,
,
. .
2007 .
( . 30-1 National Library of M edicine's Medical
30-2). Subject Headings (M eSH) PubM ed.12
177 ,
( . 30-3 40 ,
30-4), 135. ,
135
( . 30-5-30-9).
. 13 %
.
7. ,
, 30 %
.
,
( ,
.12 ,
, , ,
) , -
30-1.
-
1 3
1 3
1 3
2 1
1 2 ,
3 2
,
NTI- tss 2 2- 3 (
3)
1- ; 2- ; 3- ;
1- ; 2- ; 3-
(NTI-tss - Nociceptive Trigeminal Inhibition Clenching
Suppression System); -
460
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
,
. ,
.12
.
. 30-10. ,
.13
13 ,
6
42 %. ,
.1617 Dube .16
(44%).
2
( . 30-10), , a Van der Zaag .17
, 4
. ,
2 ( 83 %).
Harada .,18
. ( ) ,
, .
.
,
. , ,
,
, -
.6 , . Okeson
, ,13
( ),
. Gagnon .15 , 10 ,
.
,
, , .
. ,
,
8 10 ,
. -
,
. , ,
,
,
,
.12 ( )
.
,23
(Nociceptive Trigeminal ,
Inhibition Clenching Suppression System ,
NTI-tss). , .
,
.
,
,
. NTI-tss
.
.
.
Becker .20
,
, ,
,7
, .
( . 30-2). ,
NTI-tss,21 ,
, .
,
. , , Winocur .6
, , : «
6
.
.
, -
NTI-tss, ,
,22 ,
,
.
-
3 3
3 3
1-2 3
2 2
1 2
1 1-2
2 1
,
1- ; 2- ;3-
1- ; 2- ; 3-
( )
, .
».
,
(Buspirone) .8
.
. -
, ,
, ,
.8 -
- ,26
- ,
, , ,
,
-
. .
,
( 20-30 %)
.24 Nishioka .25 .27
19 %
- -
Clostridium botulinum. .
-
, ,
(3-4 )
, - - .33
.
,
,
( - .
- - , ; - ; Botox).
- - -A
,
30 %.28 ,
- - - .29 .
- -
.30
, - - , Manfredini
Guarda-Nardini.34
,
( ) ,
.31 - -
,
- -
. ,35
.29
(Food and Drug Administration,
( . 30-3)
FDA)
- - . ,
. Vanderas .37
, ,
. -
30-3.
-
? 1
7 1(
)? ,
( ) ( );
7 1
;
? 1
?- ; 1- ;2- ;3-
?- ; 1- ; 2- ; 3-
-
, ,
( )
( ).39 . ,
,
,
, .” ,
. ,
,
, .12
. ( ) Morin .,40
, ,
6 . ,
( , )
,
. ,
, ,
. ,
. ,
.41 ,
( ), , ,
, .
.
. .
-
.
,
Huynh .45
: , , Lobbezoo
, ( ), .12
( ). - , : plates (
), pep talk ( ) pills (
. ).
, . ,
(
, , )
-
( )
. ,8
20 ,
,
, ,
.1 910
, ." ,
,
,
, ,12
-
( ).2
,
,
, .
( . 31-1).
, 1.
.4
, .
2.
.
. 3. ,
, ,
.1'4-7 .
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
, ( .
20).
,
. .
,
,
, ,
. ,
.
.
,13
14 ( . ,
8), .1516
, ,
. , ,
, ,
.
,
.
, -
, ,
/ (1992- 2008)
,
.34
,
, ,
. ,
,
.
«
» , ,
PubM ed. ,
,
.
.
, ,
, ,
.
(
. ) ,
,
, 10
, .
, ,
,
. ,
, , ,
« » .
?
, ?
?
,
?
, , ,
?
,36
,
( . 31-4).
,
-
, ,
.
. ,
, ,
.
, . 31-2. ,
,
,
,
. ,
. 31-3. .
,
, ,
,37
,
.35 .3-38'41
,
1
. , ,
,
( , ,
)
2 ,
( ) .
( )
3 , ,
( )
4 ,
.
,
5
,
7
8
9 ,
10
11
31-4. PubM ed (9
2009 , : - .
. : 12 786):
,
,
2039
.
1309
554 ,
466 ,
234 ,
,
128 ( . 32).
23
20
10
. ,
.
,
. . (
. , -
, , ), ( ,
, , . .).
,
.
« .
»
.
,
, .
,
.
,
, ,
,
. , , ,
.
,
, , ,
.
,
.42
, .
, , ,
:
, •
, ,
478
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
26. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria 35. Durack D. The weight of medical knowledge. New
for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, Engl J Med 1978;278:773- 775.
examinations and specifications, critique. J Crani 36. Greenhalgh T. Papers that summarise other pa
omandib Disord 1992;6:301- 355. pers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). BMJ
27. Lobbezoo F, van Seims M K, John MT, Huggins K, 1997;315:672- 675.
Ohrbach R, Visscher CM . Use of the research di 37. Svensson P, Fejerskov O, Mikkelsen J. Editorial. Spe
agnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders cial issue: Bruxism - current status on pathophysiol
for multinational research: translation efforts and ogy and implications for oral rehabilitation. J Oral
reliability assessments in The Netherlands. J Orofac Rehabil 2008;35:475.
Pain 2005;19:301- 308. 38. Kato T, Thie N, Huynh N, M iyawaki S, Lavigne GJ.
28. John MT, Hirsch C, ReiberT, Dworkin SF. Translating Topical review: sleep bruxism and the role of pe
the Research Diagnostic Criteria for temporoman ripheral sensory influences. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:
dibular disorders into German: evaluation of con 191-213.
tent and process. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:43- 52. 39. Winocur E, Gavish A, Volkovitch M , Emodi-Peri-
29. Khoo SP, Yap AUJ, Chan YH, Bulgiba AM . Translat mam A, Eli I. Drugs and bruxism: a critical review.
ing the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporo J Orofac Pain 2003;17:99- 111.
mandibular disorders into M alay: evaluation of con 40. Lobbezoo F, Drangsholt M , Peck C, Sato H, Kopp
tent and process. J Orofac Pain 2008;22:131- 138. S, Svensson P. Topical review: new insights into the
30. List T, Dworkin SF. Comparing TM D diagnoses and pathology and diagnosis of the temporomandibular
clinical findings at Swedish and US TM D center us joint. J Orofac Pain 2004;18:181- 191.
ing research diagnostic criteria for temporomandib 41. Guarda-Nardini L, Manfredini D, Ferronato G. In
ular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1996;10:240- 253. vited review paper. Temporomandibular joint total
31. Yap AJU, Dworkin SF, Chua EK, List T, Tan KBC, replacement prosthesis: current knowledge and
Tan HH. Prevalence of temporomandibular disor considerations for the future. Int J Oral M axillofac
ders subtypes, psychologic distress and psycho Surg 2008;37:103- 110.
social dysfunction in Asian patients. J Orofac Pain 42. Clarkson JE, Turner S, Grimshaw JM , Ramsay CR,
2003;17:21- 28. Johnston M , Scott A et al. Changing clinicians' be
32. Manfredini D, Chiappe G, Bosco M . Research di havior: a randomized controlled trial of fees and
agnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders education. J Dent Res 2008;87:640- 644.
(RDC/ TM D) axis I diagnosis in an Italian patient 43. Okeson JP. The classification of orofacial pains. Oral
population. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:551- 558. M axillofac Surg Clin North Am 2008;20:133- 144.
33. Rantala M AI, Ahlberg J, Savolainen A, Kdnonen M. 44. Ogi N, Nagao T, Toyama M , Ariji E. Chronic dental
Symptoms, signs, and clinical diagnoses according infections mimicking temporomandibular disorders.
to research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibu Aust Dent J 2002;47:63- 65.
lar disorders among Finnish multiprofessional media 45. Herrera AF, Mercuri LG, Petruzzelli G, Rajan P.
personnel. J Orofac Pain 2003;17:21- 28. Simultaneous occurrence of 2 different low-grade
34. Greene CS. Science transfer in orofacial pain. In: malignancies mimicking temporomandibular joint
Lund JP, Lavigne GJ, Dubner R, Sessle BJ (eds). dysfunction. J Oral M axillofac Surg 2007;65:1353-
Orofacial Pain: From Basic Science to Clinical M an 1358.
agement. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing,
2006:281- 286.
.1'2
. XX
, . ,
.
. .3 «
»
.
.
, ,
,
,
. , .
, .
, ,
, ,
.4"6
.
-
,
.
, ,
, ,
.78
,
•
.910
•
( ,
)
•
•
,
.
- ,
(FDI)
: ,
• , . .
.
;
• ,
.
.
, .
. ,
( ) .
, ,
.2
, ,
( 32-1). , ,
, .11
. .
, ,
(
)
.
, .
. ,
,
.
.
, ,
,
, , ,
,
, .
.
, ,
. .15
,
, .
, ,
,
,
, , .
, 11 21. ,
,
. ,
. ,
.
. ,
.
,
, ,
,
. .
,
, ,
.
,
.
.
.1718 , .
,
, ,
,
.19
.
,
, ,
.
,
,
,
,
. , .
, ,
, . . . . ,
, -
, .23
, - ,
.20
, , - ,
. -
, ,
, .24
.2122 ,
.
, ,
9 19.
,
.
,
. ,
,
.
.
. - . ,
, ,
,
,
,
,
. , ( ,
,
, ,
. , ). ,
,
.
, .
.26
, . , .
,
,
.
. .
,
,
, ,
( , , ,
, .
) ,
.
, ,
, ,
.
.
,
.
,
, . .
,
,
,
,
,
: .
,
,
,
-
. , , ,
, , ,
. ,
,17
, .30
. ,
,
. . ,
( ,
),
.26 .
- 28 29.
, ,
,
.27 ,
( ) .
,
,
- .28
, ( ).
. ,
, ,
( ), -
.34
.
. 32-1. ( )
- . ,
. .
,
.
,31 , .35
,
32 ,
,
, ,
( . 32-1).
, -
(
). , -
.
.33
,
.
,
.
, -
- -
(
\
/ -
/ -
. 32-2. . ,
,
, ,
,
.3637 ,
, ,
98 % ,
-
.38'39 , , -
.
.
.
,
48 -
. ,
.40’41
.
,
,
. ,
, .
.
35 % .
30 % , ,
, -
.4243 ,
,4445 ,
( . 32-2). .
. 32-3. .
(. .
( ) ), -
,
( . 32-3).
,
-
.
.
.46-48 ,
1965 . , .
,
.49 .
,
« ».
, , ,
.50 ( 32-2).51-53
. -
,
490
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
-
32-2.
,
.
•
, или
•
.54
•
- 32-3.
1.
2. -
,
3.
. 4. (
)
, 5.
6.
- 7.
. , ,
, -
,
.
.
, -
,
( 32-3). ,
,
, ,
-
.
-
.
,
,
. ,
.
491
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
,
.
-
.
: ( , ,
), ( -
, ), .
,
,
,
. ,
,
. ,
,
,
, - .
.
/ ,
, .
, , ,
.
.
. ,
.
.
, , .
.
( 32-2).
,
.
- ( ) ,
.
,
. ,
, ,
,
.
492
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
Выводы
. . ,
- ,
, ,
, . ,
.
.
,
.
1
,
.
,
6-12 .
.
, -
,
,
.
75 %
. , ,
96 % ,
, .
2 .55 ,
,
: , .
-
,
.56
.
,
494
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
38. Toyama , Kurita , Koga , Ogi N. Ankylosis of 48. Bucci M B. Odontoiatria Legale: rapporti tra colpo
the temporomandibular joint developing shortly di frusta cervicale e disordini temporo-mandibolari
after multiple facial fractures. Int J Oral M axillofac (DTM ) [Italian]. Tagete 2007;1.
Surg 2003;32:360- 362. 49. Frankel VFL Temporomandibular joint pain syn
39. Ferretti C, Bryant R, Becker P, Lawrence C. Tem drome following deceleration injury to the cervical
poromandibular joint morphology following post- spine. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 1965;26:47- 51.
traumatic ankylosis in 26 patients. Int J Oral M axil 50. Ferrari R, Leonard M S. Whiplash and temporoman
lofac Surg 2005;34:376- 381. dibular disorders: a critical review, J Am Dent Assoc
40. Harstall R, Gratz KW, Zwahlen RA. Mandibular 1998;129:1739- 1745.
condyle dislocation into the middle cranial fossa: 51. Bergman H, Andersson F, Isberg A. Incidence of
a case report and review of literature. J Trauma temporomandibular joint changes after whiplash
2005;59:1495- 1503. trauma: a prospective study using M R imaging. Am
41. Ohura N, Ichioka S, Sudo T, Nakagawa M , Kumaido J Roentgenol 1998;171:1237- 1243.
K, NakatsukaT. Dislocation of the bilateral mandib 52. M cKay DC, Christensen LV. Whiplash injuries of the
ular condyle into the middle cranial fossa: review of temporomandibular joint in motor vehicle accidents:
the literature and clinical experience. J Oral M axil speculations and facts. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:
lofac Surg 2006;64:1165- 1172. 731- 746.
42. Cascone P, Leopardi R, Marino S, Carnemolla M E. 53. Ferrari R, Schrader FI. Prevalence of temporoman
Intracapsular fractures of mandibular condyle: diag dibular disorders associated with whiplash injury in
nosis, treatment, and anatomical and pathological Lithuania. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Ra
evaluations. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:184- 191. diol Endod 1999;87:653- 657.
43. Ellis E, Throckmorton GS. Treatment of mandibu 54. Eriksson PO, Flaggman-Flenrikson B, Zafar H. Jaw-
lar condylar process fractures: biological consider neck dysfunction in whiplash associated disorders.
ations. J Oral M axillofac Surg 2005;63:115- 134. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:404- 408.
44. Defabianis P. TM J fractures in children and ado 55. Probert TCS, Wiesenfeld D, Reade PC. Temporo
lescents: treatment guidelines. J Clin Pediatr Dent mandibular pain dysfunction disorders resulting
2003;27:191- 199. from road traffic accidents: an Australian study. Int J
45. Kempers KG, Quinn PD, Silverstein K. Surgical ap Oral M axillofac Surg 1994;23:338- 341.
proaches to mandibular condylar fractures: a re 56. Kolbinson D, Epstein JB, Burgess J, Senthilselvan A.
view. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 1999;5:25- 30. Temporomandibular disorders, headaches, and neck
46. Bucci M B, Manfredini D, Salvetti G, Bosco M . pain after motor vehicle accidents: a pilot investiga
Temporomandibular joint whiplash: implicazioni tion of persistence and litigation effects. J Prosthet
medico-legali [Italian], Doctor Os 2006;17(Suppl Dent 1997;7:46- 53.
1):96- 99.
47. Bucci M B, Salvetti G, Manfredini D, Bosco M . Colpo
di frusta e disordini temporomandibolari [Italian].
Dental Cadmos 2007;2:51- 57.
,
. ,
, ,
.
,
,
.
, , «
, , ».
,
.
XX .
,
.
. .
,
,
,
. ,
, . Bossuyt .1
- ,
(Standards for Reporting
of Diagnostic Accuracy, STARD)
, - . ,
,
,
.
. STARD / ,
,
- ,
The British Medical Journal, The Annals of
Internal Medicine The Lancet. Visscher .4
,
/ .
, , ,
, STARD,
STARD.
,
, ,
. .
.
(
) ( )
. ,
(
) .
(
, ) .
( ) -
( I:
) -
( II:
, (Consolidated Standards of Reporting
, , Trials, CONSORT).
, Altman .5
) ,
. 1992 . Samuel Dworkin, Linda
LeResche .
- .
( / ),2 , ,
. ,
/ CONSORT, .
,
(Lobbezoo .3)
. / .
,
.
.
.
4 98
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
,
,
,
.
. .
,
,
. .
( ,
, ) ,
.
. ,
. .
,
.
, ,
,
, ,
. .
,
.
,
. ,
. .
,
(
). ,
, .
STARD,
, ,
,
. CONSORT.
,
. .
,
. / .
,
.
1. Bossuyt PM , Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA,
Glasziou PP, Irwig LM et al. Towards complete and
« accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy:
, ». the STARD initiative. BMJ 2003;326:41- 44.
2. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria
for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria,
examinations and specifications, critique. J Crani
omandib Disord 1992;6:301- 355.
STARD CONSORT. 3. Lobbezoo F, van Seims M KA, John MT, Huggins K,
Ohrbach R, Visscher CM et al. Use of the research
diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders
for multinational research: translation efforts and
reliability assessments in The Netherlands. J Orofac
Pain 2005;19:301- 308.
4. Visscher CM , Naeije M , De Laat A, Michelotti A,
Nilner M , Craane et al. Diagnostic accuracy of
TM D pain tests: a multicentre study. J Orofac Pain
2009;23:108- 114.
5. Altman DC, Schulz KF, M oher D, Egger M , Davidoff
F, Elbourne D et al. The revised CONSORT state
ment for reporting randomized trials: explanation
and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001 ;134:663-
694.
5 00
@dentistinfo первый стоматологический телеграм канал
-
.
: . , . , . , .
:
. , . , . ,
. , . -
.
.
: . , .
.
.
70x100 1/16.
. 1000 .
. . 32,5
,
.
,
- . ,
-
.
,
, ,
.
,
.
-
. ,
,
, ,
, .
,
,
,
, .
, D D S,
-
( )
60 , ,
- ,
, - .
,
, .