20210109-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To President Donald J Trump-ALL Is NOT LOST

President Donald J Trump (Australia) 9-1-2021
White House, USA

@realDonaldTrump
20210109-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to President Donald J Trump-ALL IS NOT LOST

Sir,
it is a terrible tragedy when people lose their lives when pursuing something they belief in but
it is important not to lose sight in the process and ignore reality. Neither would it serves a person
to take the blame where the blame lies elsewhere, as I view can be exposed.
I have been very interested in keeping informed about matters regarding your presidency and
well aware that you have been dealing with forces that often included those who were close
working with you but betrayed you.
The violence on 6 January 2021 is not something I condone, but having been dealing with people
for some 37 years who contemplated suicide, murder and even mass murder has given me a
better “UNDERSTANDING” what drives such a person to pursue such a goal. It is then that you
can possibly assist those contemplating violence, etc, to not proceed with this. However, it
always must be understood that you need to have such a person realising that what was
contemplated is not the right way to proceed, as if you just tell them then unlikely they will in the
long run avoid the problems.
During 2020 there was lots of violence, riots, burning down buildings, etc, including murders but
it was noticeable that certain cities run by Democrats simply opposed Federal assistance to seek
to stop this all. Now I understand Mayor Wheeler, having been re-elected somehow has changed
180 decrees and as such, as I view it, his condoning and silence in the past was for re-election
rather than the concerns about the rights, wellbeing and safety of residents.
I found it appalling that Val Johnson in an interview with CNN David Axelrod then pretends that
in one case a mayor stood up as if this was the only incident of riots, etc. He called those
protestors on 6 January to have committed treason. Senator Lindsey Graham even called for
them to be jailed.
Their silence was deafening when the rioting and murders went on during 2020!
Likewise that of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
Yes, I do view that the instigators of any such conduct, also during 2020, should be charged and
if convicted be imprisoned but then we must also deal with the instigators and those behind
funding it.
While Senator Mitch McConnell indicated an investigation, and I certainly would agree, this is
badly needed but why is it taking so long when already during 2020 people were murdered and
his silence was deafening, as with numerous others?
p1 9-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
I get it, as long as one ruins the livelihood and businesses of others then well who cares, but if
someone does dare to violate your house well that goes too far, seems to be their reasoning.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) speaks to media at the Capitol in Washington on Jan. 7, 2021.
(Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times)
Sen. Lindsey Graham Says Those Who

Breached Capitol Security Should Be in Jail
My published comment upon this was:
QUOTE
Houston stop the countdown we have a problem!
We had (on video) Kamala Harris prior to the election making clear that riots would
continue during the election and afterwards. She proved this. Is this then as in the past her
rioters were infiltrating peaceful protesters? Or are we as we did during 2020 ignore any
Democrat inspired violence, destruction, riots and even murder? After all Kamala Harris is
a Democrat who FRAUDULENTLY got purportedly elected? And, where was Biden then
to deplore the violence and murder?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5THZGzrXmU
Dan Bongino – Media Sit in Shameful Silence as Pres Sec (-KAMALA HARRIS &
RIOTs)
In this video Kamala Harris is smiling about the riots and made clear that this must go on
not just until the presidential elections but beyond.
https://www.facebook.com/dan.bongino/videos/m...
In my view, Kamala Harris sanctioned the violence and she is the one who should be held
legally accountable. President Donald J Trump at no time used such inciting of violence.
Kamala Harris and Joe Biden both funded BLM, as I downloaded the records of their
involvement!
Why did Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell and others then not denlunce their conduct.
Peoples businesses were destroyed and well regardless if one may agree to revence, if that
was what eventuated, and eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth may have been the result.
If she was somehow sworn in then she should be immediately impeached!
Val Jones interviewed on CNN by David Axelrod claiming treason, etc, Well let see if they
will arrest the instigators Kamala Harris and Joe Biden for this. I doubt it.
END QUOTE
(NOTE: SPELLING ERROR denlunce SHOULD BE denounce)
Actually another (female Democrat Member of the House of Representatives also was noted in
the same video to promote violence, as I understood it to be.
You then have to ask if they lay the ground for violence and even laugh about it (Kamala Harris)
and make clear that “And they should not, and we should not.” Meaning to stop the riots,
violence, etc, then clearly she is the very person who makes clear she is in charge with the
rioting, etc, even the killings. And now they blame President Donald Trump for violence, deaths,
etc? Come on this is absurd.
As President Donald J Trump (as my wife understood it) stated:
You are very special, I know how you feel, but now go home in peace.
And
We know it has been a fraudulent, stolen election but please go home. We need peace.
We love you.
When a Trump supported was cold bloodedly murdered during 2020 in a Trump rally I
understood that Joe Biden’s comment we deafening, well I never could hear anything.
And as set out above Kamala Harris I view was not just instigating violence but even made clear,
“we” (meaning herself also) will continue this.
.
And the MSM (mainstream media) much is also at fault and every Member of Congress who
pretended the riots were mainly peaceful demonstrations, this despite murder being part of it let
alone defunding the police and even a state legislating that those assaulting police officers would
not be charged, etc.
And let not forget the DEFUNDING of the police pursued by so many Democrats Members of
Congress.
.
So what can anyone expect when the Democrats, also in States, are all having the same mantra to
DEFUND the police. Well, somehow now that the Congress was invaded suddenly the police
and others must protect those who have been laying the ground for this mayhem.
Sedition, terrorism, insurrection and other names used by Members of Congress in my view
applies very much to all those who were involved in the elaborate theft of the election.
For years on end the Democrats were going on about “Russian collusion, Impeachment, and
other rot, and with the violence they had no stopping their rot and the end result was to steal an
election. Those in my view are the real criminals.
I may not agree with anyone invading the Parliament (Congress) but I can understand that when
you have about 60 court cases as it appears to me being railroaded then the People have no other
choice but to make clear they take it no more.
At no time did I become aware of any supporter of President Donald J Trump to incite violence
but ample wrote that they do not desire to have their President robbed of the election he won.
.
The slogan “Rules for thee but not for me” has been repeatedly referred to where democrats
dictated all kinds of rules only for themselves to blatantly violate them.
Here we have a Member of Congress as I understood it being named Moore not attending to the
Congress since May 2020 because of the fear of COVID-19 and by proxy apparently allowing a
vote on a more than 5,000 pages Bill without having a clue what really is in it. Yet, getting paid
all along, while innocent hardworking Americans have their business destroyed and livelihood
destroyed. And, then somehow this Moore then still is positive for the virus and can then travel
to Congress. Never mind any other traveller who may not have been infected. After all: “Rules
for thee but not for me”.
And, let us not ignore that every Member of Congress who failed to vote to amend or all together
get rid of 230 is in my view as much as culpable of the mayhem that eventuated on 6 January
2021. After all the media have been concealing the truth from many Americans, that in a sense I
in Australia am able to get more relevant news as those in the USA. The media was complicit to
the violence in that they concealed most of it and referred to “peaceful demonstrations” even of
police officers were callously attacked with all kinds of weapons and injured and even killed.
Little wonder then that this was breeding a sense of acceptance by others that when you have a
candidate for the Vice Presidency seemingly endorsing violence, etc, then well they were not
going to take it anymore.
In my view 230 should have been removed all together as the Big Tech in my view were
interfering with a fair and proper election, and concealing the truth from Electors.
.
In Australia, the High Court of Australia (Albert Langer case) held that there can be no
restriction to voters as to be able to make an informed decision they must be able to have relevant
details regarding those candidates and their government. Well, this clearly has been grossly
denied in the USA in regard of the last 2020 presidential election.
In my view, any politicians who failed to support the 230 removal to ensure that Big Tech also
are held accountable is a humbug.
Then you have Mitch McConnell pointing out that you cannot pay out $2,000 checks at burden
of the grand children and others. I can understand his line of arguments but also can understand
that in view of the lockdowns, etc, if you enable people to spend monies then you revitalise many
businesses and a large part of the monies spend are returned in taxes that apply to many items.
As such on a economical point of view it may have been appropriate to support the $2,000
payments, albeit instead of having prisoners in prison being paid unemployment benefits and
some receiving $10,000 or more I view that Mitch McConnell should have made clear all this
rubbish about gender issue in foreign countries has absolutely nothing to do with emergency
relied for COVID-19.
In my view, the Omnibus Bill is crazy at the very least and those who pushed for it I view need
to be locked into an asylum. Spending about 900 Billion on foreign countries is absurd.
In my view, there must be an Amendment to the US constitution similar as that exist in

Australia’s constitution:
QUOTE
54 Appropriation Bills
The proposed law which appropriates revenue or moneys for the ordinary annual services of the
Government shall deal only with such appropriation.
55 Tax Bill
Laws imposing taxation shall deal only with the imposition of taxation, and any provision therein
dealing with any other matter shall be of no effect.
Laws imposing taxation, except laws imposing duties of customs or of excise, shall deal with one
subject of taxation only; but laws imposing duties of customs shall deal with duties of customs
only, and laws imposing duties of excise shall deal with duties of excise only.
END QUOTE
What Americans have witnessed is that Members of Congress are basically doing nothing and
obstructing the good work President Donald J Trump was doing and achieving and blatantly
disregarding the suffering of the Americans who were paying the taxes and yet Members of
Congress then set out to [ass Bills that provide for unlawful immigrants to get a better financial
deal then the taxpayers. Those Members of Congress are not interested to “REPRESENT” the
constituents, but are out to just enrich themselves.
.
I do not seek to imply that I endorse the mayhem that eventuated on 6 January but to be honest
the politicians had this coming to them. And, I expect a lot more and far worse to eventuate if
Members of Congress do not get their act together and finally look after the very People who are
sending them to Congress to represent their interest and not of unlawful immigrants who violated
US laws.
In my own self-pronounce Crummy English I understood the statements to be (albeit one has to
check the video for what actually was stated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5THZGzrXmU
Dan Bongino – Media Sit in Shameful Silence as Pres Sec
interviewer: ...... protest still happening..

That is right. They are not going to stop.
Kamala Harris:
They are not going to stop. And this is a movement
they are not going to stop. And everyone be aware
that they are not going to stop. They are not going
to stop before election day in November. And they
are not going to stop after election day. And that
should be everyone taking notice of this on both
levels. This is, they are not going to let up. And they
should not, and we should not.
Repeat:
And they should not, and we should not.
In my view, this is inciting riots to continue during and after the November election!
OK, you may hold that unlikely the House of Representatives will pursue Impeachment
proceedings against Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, but in my view it may not be that difficult.
.
Do consider also that Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and lots of other former
presidential candidates were funding the BLM!

Once can also consider:
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/12/17/california-clearly-violated-election-law-votes-are-invalid/
California Clearly Violated Election Law—

Votes are Invalid
QUOTE
California violated its own election laws

In California state law, the election code is titled “Division 13. BALLOTS, SAMPLE
BALLOTS, AND VOTER PAMPHLETS.”
In Article 1 of this code we find Election Code 13200, which reads as follows:
“Ballots not printed in accordance with the chapter [Chapter 3] shall not be cast nor
counted at any election.”
That’s straightforward English. It’s at the 9th-grade reading level, so assuming California’s
election officials can understand it, here it is one more time, with emphasis:
“Ballots not printed in accordance with the chapter [Chapter 3] shall not be cast nor counted at
any election.”
When we read a little further, we find Section 13205. Since we’re talking about the election
of the President and Vice President, we’ll look at the applicable subsection:
13205 (b). In elections when electors of President and Vice President of the United States
are to be chosen, there shall be placed upon the ballot, in addition to the instructions to
voters as provided in this chapter, an instruction as follows:
“To vote for all of the electors of a party, mark the voting target next to the names of the
presidential and vice presidential candidates of that party. A mark of the voting target next
to the name of a party and its presidential and vice presidential candidate, is a vote for all
of the electors of that party, but for no other candidates.”
END QUOTE
There is more to it but you will get the gist.
Anything that was on the purported California ballots clearly never was lawfully voted upon.
As I understand it, ballots are used not just for federal political elections but also for other state
issues. As such what one need is simply one California resident to object to the validity of the
ballots and well the lot will be declared invalid. This means that Nancy Pelosi as from 3 January
2021 no longer was a Member of the House of Representatives, neither so any other purported
California elected federal Member of Congress, such as Adam Schiff, etc.
This I view would mean that when there was an election for Speaker McCarthy rightfully was the
qualified person, and should be deemed to have been elected.
.
This also means that the political vote as to the counting of the Electoral College Slates was to be
deemed invalid, this as Nancy Pelosi had no “legal standing” not being a Member of Congress.
Likewise as I understand Adam Schiff had no “legal standing” to make any presentation on 6
January 2021 in that he too as I understand it was not a Member of Congress, where his
California election is not valid.
There is an issue that the US Constitution and its amendments are to be understood being in
some ways pure legal and in other ways are political and others are both political and legal
issues.
.
Let me try to explain this.
.
Members of Congress ordinary can vote for Bills as they view to be allowed on their political
views. Any Bills enacted can then be struck down by SCOTUS when it is held that the part or the
whole legislation violates the supreme law the constitution (so any Amendments). As such, we
have a political that can be subject to a legal reasoning. SCOTUS would not be interested if
Members had their own political views as to why they voted for a certain Bill but would be
purely driven by if the Bill when it became an Act of Parliament actually was within the bounds
of constitutional limitations.
When it comes to Impeachment then it is basically a “political” issue as Members of either
Houses vote to what they deem politically acceptable to them. The Chief Justice function is one
so that the Chief Justice is there to pursue that all and any argument is presented in a legal
accepted format. As such, the experiences of the Chief Justice is to maintain a quasi-legal format
even so it is in a political atmosphere. Yet, one find this not to apply when it comes to the
counting of the slates of Election College votes. The Chief Justice is then not involved but
instead it is the political figure of a Vice President. The Vice President is in some ways bound to
comply with what is dictated by the constitution but has certain freedoms that he is also given
special political freedoms. The Constitution as I understand it requires that the Vice President
shall count the Electoral College slates (votes) but he is legally bound to remain within the
constitutional process requirements. This I view means that he cannot violate any constitutional
process and neither any embedded legal principle in it. The constitution is not just existing of 12th
Amendment but is a part of the entire constitution. As such, the constitution has been amended in
many ways by numerous Amendments that directly or indirectly can be applicable how the Vice
President as President of the joint sitting must conduct matters.
The constitution for example in the 14 Amendment appears to govern that there must be equality.
As such, this Amendment affects also the 12th Amendment.
The Constitution clearly provides for rights, etc, and as such, you cannot just take out of context
one part of the constitution as if it is on its own the entire constitution but it must be considered
in the total context of the constitution. While there are “conventions” they never can overrule
what the constitution allows. As such, “conventions” do not in any way change the constitution
or its application.
In 1876 there was as I understand it an election commission to investigate a dispute in a

presidential election. This is a “convention” which doesn’t mean it overrides the constitution but
rather it is a way to seek to resolve a political dispute.
I understand that Vice president Jefferson when counting the disputed Electoral College slates
(votes) he then in the end declared that he as the presidential candidate was the successful
candidate, by declining to count votes that were in his view not to be counted.
The Constitution as I understand it requires that the Electoral College slates (votes) are
determined by the State legislatures.
I understand that Vice President Mike Pence made a declaration prior to the joint session that he
was bound by the constitution but would count Electoral College votes that were submitted. As
such not to include the consideration of disputed Electoral College votes.
I have not read his statement, but in my view, Vice President Mike Pence had to follow both
political and legal procedures. No matter what legal process any State may have in place I view
the Vice President during the joint session cannot consider any Electoral College Slate (votes)
that are not the will of the State Legislatures. He is bound to follow the constitution.
How the State legislature comes to establishing its Electoral College slates is for the States to
consider, albeit in my view it must never violate the constitution. Where any State allows for
counting of votes of any person who also voted in another State for the same federal political
election than the vote cannot be counted, this as to count them would in my view violate the 14th
Amendment of equality. Likewise, each state has a federal constitutional obligation to ensure that
each and every candidate is provided with the same (equal) right and not in any manner one
candidate is deprived of equality. Hence, if any State were to hold an election that disadvantages
one particular candidate as not have the same equal counting then this would be unconstitutional.
If therefore any voting system gives an ability to deny a voter his/her 100% entitlement for the
candidate he/she voted for then the election process cannot be validated. Where there is
equipment in use that allows votes to be “adjudicated” (allegedly up to about 96%) with the
original ballot being destroyed then this I view also violated the 14 th Amendment.
Where is no chain of custody of when a voter cast a vote and the final tally (as was shown in a
video presented to Georgia legislators) then there is no validity in the election process either.
Electoral staff should never be allowed to alter any ballots in any manner. If an election
equipment fails to recognise any ballot then those ballots must be set aside and later be
adjudicated involving representatives of each candidate to ensure that for so far possible the will
of the voter is considered. The moment any electoral officer changes the ballot and/or replaces it
then it violates in my view also the legal requirements of keeping ballots for 22 months. I view a
federal offense. In my view the lost of about 47 USB thumbs neither can be accepted as to
nevertheless validate any election because it means that votes can be manipulated.
Neither any vote counting that allows third parties to unlawfully interfere with election results.
Where there was, as I understand it, in Georgia a deduction of about 3,405 votes from Joe Biden
but then returned and then removed from your totals also underlines that the election results
cannot be legally justified.
No one in his right mind can accept that during counting any candidate somehow can withdraw
or have others doing so from the total of votes recorded. It is not like some candidate is going on
a spending spree as if using votes to purchase items in a store.
There are numerous other issues, such as reportedly an old school bus located in the
dessert with a voting machine and ballots.
Then there I understand was a claim that ballots watermarks were not correct allegedly for being
printed elsewhere. The very purpose of water marks was to ensure that no fraudulent ballots can
be used. As such, I view that any ballots that were without the proper water marks then cannot be
validly counted.
.
Again, there are numerous other issues but you may get the understanding that I view that
regardless some may be political decisions and other constitutional issues nevertheless the
election process must be transparent and properly conducted. Excluding poll watches from
observing the counting itself invalidates any counting process.
Recounting (audit) ballots that include election officers created ballots but not the original ballots
provided by the voters also denied a valid election result. The moment one can use a counting
system to replace the voters initial intention without having any proper record if the newly
created ballot is identical in intentions as that of the voter then it is not a valid system because it
denies the elector its 14th Amendment rights.
Perhaps in my research I failed to note in the US constitution and any of its Amendments that the
constitution provided that FRAUD overrides any constitutional provisions, but I will assume no
such absurd provision exist. After all the constitution very much is about equality, etc.
.
Members of Congress are sworn in to uphold the Constitution. In my view this means that even
so they can make political decisions as how to vote upon a Bill they nevertheless must never vote
on a Bill they reasonably are aware of would violate the constitution. The Constitution is what
provides them to have a right to be members of Congress and cannot be undermines by their
political changens.
Therefore, where Members of either House are faced with disputes about Electoral College
Slates (votes) they must not ignore any FRAUD that is presented as affecting the particular State.
If no issues of FRAUD are presented they are entitled to make their political decision as they
deem fit and proper. However, if FRAUD is alleged then they cannot merely ignore this and
make a political decision to nevertheless vote for their particular candidate. They must ensure
that they consider all and any evidence presented as to any election irregularities and unless they
are resolved within the sessions they must refrain from voting and as what eventuated in 1876
have an electoral committee investigating matters.
The President of the Joint Session, being the Vice President having been presented by any person
as to alleged election irregularities and/or FRAUD cannot then ignore this but must ensure that
those issues are first appropriately investigated and unless eliminated of any such claimed
conduct cannot count any Electoral College votes. In my view the Vice President cannot claim
having certain authorities because of the provisions of the Constitution (so its Amendments) and
then blatantly disregard the very 14th and other Amendment provisions. In my view, the 14th
Amendment reflects upon the 12th Amendment and as such the powers of the Vice President as
President of the Joint Session is limited and to ensure that there is equality, etc.
In my view, therefore, is that first of all the Vice President was in no position to count any
purported Electoral College votes that he was made aware of were disputed by certain State
Legislatures. In particular where there was one or more States who notified the Vice President
about a dispute, I view it was not for the Vice President to nevertheless deny those States to
clarify their Electoral College votes.
As I refer to below FRAUD can never validate anything. not even judgments. Hence, if the
Electoral College votes that were counted by the Vice President during the joint session were the
produce of FRAUD then they were not within the powers of the Vice President to count them.
Even if after the Vice President may have counted Electoral College votes without anyone
objecting against any such votes and the Vice President declares who was the successful
candidate and then the successful candidate is sworn in as President and subsequently it is
revealed that the was FRAUD involved and the Vice President decision was based upon
FRAUDLENT votes, then the entire process is invalid and the purported president never was and
the candidate allegedly defeated then rightfully is to be sworn in as President.
It is a matter of law that even a court order obtained by FRAUD has no legal force once this is
exposed. There in my view is no legal provision in the constitution that would indicate that a
person FRAUDULENTLY being sworn in somehow then can remain to be President.
Neither can the Chief Justice swear in a Person to be President when the Chief Justice is aware of
the claim of FRAUD. His position is to ensure that the person to be sworn in is rightly entitled to
be so, and even if the person is sworn in then this can be nullified where fraud is discovered.
See Sue v Hill, senator Woods, Barnaby Joyce and numerous other cases where despite persons
having been sworn in afterwards were deemed not to be validly elected). If therefore the States
proceeds with their decertification and replace them with the legislature certifications then this
still will have its legal powers to determine even at this late hour who shall be president.
While the constitution determines a 20 January 2021 date, this however must not be deemed to
override FRAUD! Say a president elect and a Vice President elect becomes ill and die before
being sworn in then obviously the 20 January 2021 date may not be kept and so while the
constitution may provide for a date it cannot always be complied with, in certain circumstances.
If there is a successful challenge to the California ballots and they are held to be invalid then this
means that Nancy Pelosi had no business either to come to some agreement with Mitch
McConnell as to the rules of the joint session.
.
For argument sake, if California were to have its ballots declared invalid. In my view then there
would be about 55 persons having to leave the House of Representatives not having been validly
elected, which are about 50 Democrats. This would provide the majority to the Republicans and
McCarthy would be then the Speaker. He could then immediately pursue Impeachment
proceedings against Kamala Harris and Joe Biden having funded BLM, and also Kamala Harris
for having clearly shown to encourage/incite violence. Nancy Pelosi could be impeached for
pretending to be an office holder when she was not and for obtaining monies under false
pretences, etc. Likewise so, I view, Adam Schiff, etc.
I will now reproduce an email I forwarded to a Constitutional Law Professor as I view their
political purge is to be deemed unacceptable.
QUOTE 8-1-2021 EMAIL (typo errors have been left in)
Message navigation
Subject: Gerrit to Penelope Andrews – FEEDBACK
mailto:admin@inspector-rikati.com"Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka
penelope.andrews@nyls.edu
"mailto:admin@inspector-rikati.com"Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B."
Reply-
admin@inspector-rikati.com
To
Date Today 03:38
Attachments
 .?_task=mail&_action=get&_mbox=INBOX&_uid=24749&_token=C51xg693SWs8tdA
7Scu2eRrIjuO3SQaT&_part=2.?_task=mail&_action=get&_mbox=INBOX&_uid=24749&_t
oken=C51xg693SWs8tdA7Scu2eRrIjuO3SQaT&_part=22021.01.07_23h55m15s_536_.png(~909
KB)Options
 .?_task=mail&_action=get&_mbox=INBOX&_uid=24749&_token=C51xg693SWs8tdA
7Scu2eRrIjuO3SQaT&_part=3.?_task=mail&_action=get&_mbox=INBOX&_uid=24749&_t
oken=C51xg693SWs8tdA7Scu2eRrIjuO3SQaT&_part=32021.01.08_00h23m49s_552_.png(~383
KB)Options
Message Body
Penelope,
I reside in Australia and watched video and other news bulletins as I am very much interested
in what goes on in the USA, because of constitutional issues.
The 1878 presidential election did call in a election commission, which is what I understand is
sought by President Donald J Trump and others.
I as a constitutionalist seeks to ignore political sides and pursue what the true meaning and
application stands for.
If you had followed the presentations such as before the Georgia legislature showing that
Donald J. Trumps voted were switched with that of Biden, causing Biden to purportedly win,
which since the Georgia Legislators realise President J Donald Trump actually won, hence the
slated Electoral College for President Donald J Trump, then you would have understood that
nothing the President did was in any shape of form to invoke the 25 th amendment. To the
contrary it shows that those who opposed the Election Commission seeking to rely upon a
fraudulent election result are those who disgraced the very seat of the legislature time and
time again.
.
As I understand it Wisconsin rejected about 200,000 ballots because they were not printed
according to Wisconsin legal provisions., In my view that was correct. California had as I
understand it all of its ballots in violation with California legal requirements and as such
everything on the ballot was never voted upon. This means that not a single Member of
Congress was re-elected/elected and so Nancy Pelosi since 3 January 2021 is not a Member of
Congress, neither Adam Schiff, and others as there was no valid election.
.
Nancy Pelosi therefore cannot be Speaker, as you need to be duly elected to be a Member of
the House of Representatives.
When BLM and Antifa were not just rioting and destroying businesses that many people of
colour had their businesses destroyed, then Biden was no where to ask them to stop. In fact, I
have a video that Kamala Harris made clear this would continue during and after the election.
In my view the House of Representatives and neither the Senate could validly vote on any
Electoral college slate where they are based upon FRAUD.
AS THE COURTS HAVE MADE CLEAR THAT EVEN JUDGEMENTS ARE INVALID
WHEN BASED UPON FRAUD.
If you are truly interested in law and order and not just some sheeple to go along with
whatever the media feeds you, I invite you to reply and I can provide video’s with clear set
out why the election was marred by fraud. The evidence is in.
As to the entering of the Congress building, the violation of anyone's business/home for the
occupiers is no less then what was happening with the Congress building. Yet, for months and
even now such riots are going on. Where was Biden then to denounce it all? Again,. Kamal
Harris made clear the riots, etc, would continue (on video)
What I understand is that President Donald J Trump requested the people to leave in peace.
He did not in any shape or form incite anyone to invade the Congress.
I personally oppose any form of violence but can “UNDERSTAND” why people
contemplated suicide, murder and even mass-murder, as I have been dealing with them for
about 37 years.
When the People find that there is ample of evidence of FRAUD but the courts use all kinds
of legal technicalities to avoid considering the “evidence” then the trust they are to have in
their courts and government are disappearing.
In 2001 I challenged the validity of a federal election but not until 19 July 2006 did I succeed.
By that time too late to restore anything, however I proved I was right on constitutional basis
all along.
If you do care about the constitution then I expect you to respond to me and request me to
explain what articles/video’s there are and the links to them so you can then check it out for
yourself.
And if you then find that indeed the MSM and others are feeding you false/deceptive
information then at least apologise to President Donald J Trump for having been so.
In my view people like yourself are really the one's destroying the Republic by siding with a
party to ignore what is constitutionally relevant and applicable.
.
The constitution provides for a election system and obviously based upon election results that
are not contaminated by FRAUD.
IN MY VIEWE NOT A SINGLE TRUE CONSTITUTIONALIUST WOULD HOLD THAT
IT IS OK TO USE FRAUD,
Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom's Max.
349.
Ex malificio non oritur contractus. A contract cannot arise out of an act radically wrong and
illegal. Broom's Max. 851.
Ex nudo pacto non oritur action. No actions arise on a naked contract without a consideration.
See Nudum Pactum.
Ex turpi causa non oritur action. No action arises out of an immoral consideration.
Ex turpi contractu non oritur actio. No action arises on an immoral contract.
oFraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.
Fraus et jus numquam cohabitant. Fraud and justice never agree together. Wing. 680.
Qui inique non erit aequi - He who has committed iniquity, shall not have equity. Francis'
Max., Max. 2.
Non faciat malum, ut inde veniat bonum. You are not to do evil that good may come of it. 11
Co. 74.
http://familyguardian.tax-
tactics.com/Subjects/LawAndGovt/ChallJurisdiction/AuthoritiesArticle/AuthOnJurisdiction.ht
m
QUOTE
37 Am Jur 2d at section 8 states, in part: "Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts.
Indeed, the principle is often stated, in broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys
the validity of everything into which it enters, and that it vitiates the most solemn contracts,
documents, and even judgments."
END QUOTE
In my view, Vice president Mike Pence was dishonouring his role as Presiding officer of the
joint session when he announced as he did irrespective of any FRAUD. Likewise so I view
Nancy Pelosi to announce prior to the Joint session that Biden will be confirmed. In my view
any decision would be invalid where they are based upon FRAUDULENT election results.
And, if indeed, as reports made clear, that all California ballots was in vailoation of California
law and so couldn’t be counted then it means every purported elected Member in California
never was. As such, nancy Pelosi had no legal standing to be Speaker either.
In Australia the High Court of Australia made clear that if a person was sworn in but found
not to have been eligible then the person never was validly sworn in.
.
As Kim also outlined in 2018 about Prime Minister Boris Johnson legal battles that the UK
High Court held that Prime Minister Johnson had no legal position to advise Her Majesty to
prorogue the House and as such the House was never prorogued (regardless of that the Queen
had done so).
Therefore, I view any COMPETENT constitutionalist before harping upon President Donald
J. Trump should take the time to check out details and if then discover that indeed the election
was stolen then to voice this and not by some political bias refuse to acknowledge this.
.
Indeed upcoming lawyers being taught by constitutional law professors have a right to be
educated appropriately and not being deceived in political mantra’s that may serve a law
professor.
.
At this time of writing (Australia is about ahead with the date compared with the USA) I do
not know what the Congress did let alone of VP Mike Pence betrayed his oath to uphold the
constitution.
.
Fair to state that even in the event hypotethically Biden was sworn in then it would sytill be
invalid where this resulted to fraudulent election results. No one has to acknowledge any
fraudulent election result.
.
The saying “NOT MY PRESIDENT” would in fact then be fitting to all Americans, this as
one cannot claim rightfully being a President when based upon election fraud.
.
The fact that State legislatures are now slating electors for President Donald J. Trump is not
because of being Republicans but because of the undisputable evidence presented to them that
convinced thenm that the election was stolen.
I would expect any constitutional law professor to have more than a grain of salt in their head
to be able to understand that constitutional provisions are based on what is right in law and not
to be understood that FRAUD can override the constitution.
You may obviously persist in the 25 th Amendment to be used but in my view you were to
disgrace yourself forever.
I read reports that some planted persons may have instigated the disturbance, as to make it
violent.
In my view if you cannot differentiate facts from fiction (FAKE NEWS) then you ought not
teach anyone but first yourself.
Where in 1876 the very process was used now pursued by certain Republican and President
Donald J Trump then obviously despite the MSM FAKE NEWS the President did absolutely
nothing wrong.
.
I can assure you if I held he was doing something unlawful I would not hessitate to expose
this.
However, as it appears to me President Donald J Trump us the “People’s President” and was
elected, based upon the “evidence” I have watched and read about.
.
Constitutional law professors in my view should stop bickering on political views and be and
remain open minded as to what really are the FACTS.
.
This 25th Amendment and nonsense about Impreachment has been going on for years while
the real culprits are left betrying the Republic.
It is regrettable that people stormed the Congress but I can “UNDERSTAND” even so do not
condone it, as after all you got now the nonsense to deny even a person to be called father,
mother, sister, brother, etc, and I view this goes against the very equality the constitution
seeks to provide for.
Would any woman prefer to be referred to as being a “menstruating person” even if they
might already be senior citizens, rather then being referred to as being a woman or mother,
etc?
What I rather would like to have seen is constitutional law professors to communicate with
each other in a proper and clear manner how to pursue an amendment of the constitution that
any person who is to stand as a candidate for a Presidential election must be willing to
undergo a medical examination as to ascertain if the person is fit and proper to be President, if
so elected.
I admired JFK and have recordings of what he stated. I acknowledge however that his
reported ill health should have been addressed before he became President. With biden he has
been referring to kamala Harris as “President Elect” and Kamala Harris also stated (all before
the election) that as President she would issue Executive Orders.
Now it was reported that Biden in Georgia claimed that people voting for the Democratic
candidate would get their $2,000 checks. In my view, that is sufficient to hold he violated
electoral laws. And if the Senate is not dominated by the Democrats then those deceived to
vote for the run off candidates may hold to have been deceived again.
One may also ask was the run off needed, as if so many ballots were not valid in Georgia
and/or went missing then how many were for the Republican Senators standing for re-
election?
As also was presented to the Georgia legislators, that original ballots were being destroyed,
about 113,00 or more of them. As such, newly created ballots were never reflecting the
originals. It also means that if you do a recount of fabricated ballots then you ignore the true
votes of the voters.
.
Why did Richard Barron, Fulton County, Georgia Elections Director claim that more than
113,000 ballots had to be adjudicated (about 96% I understand) . surely any fairminded person
would hold that to replace about 96% of the ballots with electronic ballots cannot be justified.
If a voting system has a problem to read ballots then it shouldn’t be used. But is it is then it
must not have such huge eror margin. Neither can anyone accept that Biden hiding in his
bunker somehow had a 90% or more vote for himself, even 100% (or in some area’s over
200%, I read in an article). How can anyone somehow have 3,504 less voted as being
deducted. Surely votes are stable or increase bu to accept that somehow a candidates votes are
decreasing is a mathematical absurdity.
In my view any person calling himself a constitutional law professor who were to support a
25th Amendment against President Donald J Trump so to say better get some proper medical
attention as such a person I view lacks to understand reality.
Irrespective what the final decision might be by VP Mike Pence, it would in my have
absolutely no constitutional validity if this is by ignoring any fraud in election results.
In my view, the constitution is all about rights, equality, etc, and I view VP Mike Pence is
bound to reflect this in what he does.
As such, I view his peors are limited that he can only Electoral College slates that are not
tainted by FRAUD.
FOR THIS AN ELECTION COMMISSION IS TO INVESTIGATE MATTERS AND
REPORT THE TRUE FACTS. Failing this, I view, no President Biden term can be
validitated.
.
If indeed California ballots were all invalid and coun’t be counted this means about 55
California votes would also be inadmissible.
Also, if indeed Nancy Pelosi was not validly elected then by right McCarthy must be deemed
to be the rightful elected Speaker, where the majority was with the Republicans, if you
disallow for the Memnbers of Crongess who were not validly elected in the California
dissaster surround the ballots.
It means the Rules set by McConnell and Pelosi neither have any validity.
.
Talk about making a disaster of the Congress, well I view constitution law professors better
did to realize what really is wrong in it all rather then expressing their political mantra
ignoring what the constitution really stands for.
As I understand it the destruction of at least 113,000 original ballots violates federal law
which requires them to be kept 22months. This is what disenfranchise voters, as their true
ballots were destroyed, and destroyed by whatever.
In my view all is not lost for President Donald J Trump, because any FRAUDULENT
swearing in is without legal validity.
See also attachments
Gerrit
--
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®
107 Graham Road
Viewbank 3084, Victoria, Australia
Author of INSPECTOR-RIKATI® books on certain constitutional and other legal

issues.
THE MORAL OF A SOCIETY CAN BE MEASURED BY HOW IT PROVIDES FOR THE DISABLED
END QUOTE 8-1-2021 EMAIL
It is my view that were certain state legislatures correct the Electoral College slates and
California declare their ballots having been invalid then you will be beyond doubt be deemed to
be the President as to your rightful entitlement.
I noted that (so my wife indicates, as she understood it) Joe Biden stated:
Violence must end NOW
Non democratic cannot believe
And
Small number of extremist must stop for the sake of the country.
But then let’s also be clear about the following:
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-voter-protection-not-idUSKBN27E2VH
QUOTE
The clip shared by Trump, McEnany and others starts around the 19:13 mark, when Biden
tells Pfeiffer and Lovett, “Secondly, we’re in a situation where we have put together—
and you guys did it for President Obama’s administration before this—we have put
together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the
history of American politics.”
END QUOTE
While it might be claimed this was a slip of the tong. Nevertheless, it may have been a slip of the
tong only to have unintendedly revealed that election fraud was a big issue.
Hence, no need to get out but remain in the basement if election officials were to have been
bribed that no matter what Joe Biden would win the election by hook or by crook.
Is Kamala Harris also going to claim that it was a “slip of the tong” that she as I view it
incited riots, etc? This while she seemed to enjoy the warning to others she was giving
If Joe Biden truly means “for the sake of the country.” And, so, any Member of Congress then I
have absolutely no doubt that President Donald J Trump is rightfully declared to be the
successful candidate of the 3 November 2020 political presidential election. Any Member of
Congress who doesn’t support this should for ever hold their tong and not make claims about law
and Order where they themselves violated the implied legal principles of the constitution.
In my view, any politicians who voted for Joe Biden to be President and Kamala Harris to be
Vice President has disgraced his/her oath/affirmation to uphold the US Constitution. In my view,
they disgraced the Congress itself with their ongoing antics and to try to take the moral high
ground isn’t going to work because when you steal what is very valuable to most Americans their
rights to vote to decide who shall be elected by FRAUDULENT conduct then you are asking and
indeed inviting civil war. In appears to me that the judiciary has been an utter and total disgrace
to railroad numerous cases. No Member of Congress can claim to pursue Law and Order when
blatantly supporting FRAUDLENT election results. In my view, they are in principle having the
blood of those who died on their hands, because they could have avoided it had they acted
appropriately and refuse to accept FRAUDULENT election results.
What should be understood is that every Member of Congress has a constitutional obligation that
only a rightful elected candidate can become President and Vice President. Those who vote in the
Congress along party lines rather than to ensure fair and proper elections I view are very much
who have blood on their hands as they are the once who disgraced the Congress and must be
deemed liable for the harm that eventuated. Likewise, every judicial officer who failed to
consider the relevant “evidence” I view disgraced his oath/affirmation of office. Much has been
written as I understand it, that politicians and judicial officers as well as others have so to say
sold their souls to the devil. (I do not seek to have a religious input into this) and well if they
really want to do matters for “for the sake of the country.” Then they should resign so that if
they are subject to blackmail, etc, they at least do not rob Americans of their rightful elected
President. In my view if Joe Biden was to nevertheless pursue to be sworn in as President then
his “for the sake of the country.” I view means crap, as he is not showing to be genuine. It is
easy to demand others to follow certain rules but then blatantly violate them yourself. “Rules for
thee but not for me”.
I downloaded numerous videos including of Democrat Senators claiming in 2019 (in writing)
that the election system cannot be trusted, well you were right and Texas also made this clear
refusing certain election equipment to be used. But, one is a gutless wonder when you stake a
claim and then abandon it merely because your particular candidate FRAUDLENTLY seems to
have gotten the Electoral College votes.
I always had the legal principle that I rather would lose in any case then to FRAUDULENTLY
succeed. At least I relied upon my own set of morals, even so they are not religious indoctrinated
to me. I view that what goes around comes around and if you pursue honesty then this will be
your reward also. In my view, any Republican who betrayed their Republican leader President
Donald J Trump should resign and let a more honourable person(s) take over the seat. This, as
voters are entitled that their representatives do not undermine that party leader.
As for the Sergeant-at-Arms, don’t make him the scapegoat for the failures and FRAUD of
the politicians, etc. Were the instigators Kamala Harris people to start the mayhem?
One need to return to the organics and legal principles embedded in of the federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

20210109-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To President Donald J Trump-ALL Is NOT LOST

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

20210109-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To President Donald J Trump-ALL Is NOT LOST

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

President Donald J Trump (Australia) 9-1-2021

White House, USA

20210109-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to President Donald J Trump-ALL IS NOT LOST

Likewise that of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Sen. Lindsey Graham Says Those Who

(NOTE: SPELLING ERROR denlunce SHOULD BE denounce)

As President Donald J Trump (as my wife understood it) stated:

In my view, there must be an Amendment to the US constitution similar as that exist in

interviewer: ...... protest still happening..

p5 9-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

California Clearly Violated Election Law—

California violated its own election laws

p6 9-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

In 1876 there was as I understand it an election commission to investigate a dispute in a

Date Today 03:38

Author of INSPECTOR-RIKATI® books on certain constitutional and other legal

Violence must end NOW

Non democratic cannot believe

But then let’s also be clear about the following:

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

Вам также может понравиться