Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

Letters to the Editor-in-Chief

SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS
On “The Basics of Training for Muscle trained subjects and athletes can result in a plateau in maximal
Size and Strength” strength (7).

Dear Editor-in-Chief, TRAINING TO FAILURE


The majority of studies and reviews indicate training to failure
We read the article of Buckner et al. (1), hoping to find new
is unnecessary, and loading does make a difference (7). Evi-
insights on resistance training. Unfortunately, the article is a
dence from both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies indi-
restatement of information contained in previously published
cate selective hypertrophy can result from different loading
reviews from this group. Here are our major concerns:
schemes; training to failure, particularly with higher repeti-
tions, tended to select type I motor units, whereas heavier load-
HYPERTROPHY AND STRENGTH GAINS ing and ballistic movements targeted type II motor units (8).
These observations likely play an important role in the training
Buckner et al. believe that high-volume phases are unneces- and performance outcomes of athletes.
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse by BhDMf5ePHKbH4TTImqenVPWx2hcEpdL/s3rL0OVfAuRFSCWwQzTW7c5q2EkRMi8z on 08/14/2020

sary. Initial alteration in body composition (including myofi-


brillar hypertrophy) is conceptually (along with the more
important increased work capacity) a tenet of resistance train- MISREPRESENTATION OF THE LITERATURE
ing periodization. The paradigm of first developing muscle Finally, selective use of references, careless editing of
cross-sectional area (CSA) is not new (2) and has substantial quoted statements, and what appear to be misrepresentations
theoretical support. We believe there is sufficient evidence in- of literature in this review fosters misconceptions among
dicating that hypertrophy resulting from resistance training, readers. One particular example is that of Morehouse and
along with other factors, enhances maximum strength (3). Miller (2). We encourage interested readers to examine
The degree of enhancement depends on several factors, in- pages 59 to 60 and 244 to 246 to surmise what the authors
cluding training methods and trained state. Although we agree actually stated; the meaning derived directly from the source
that the impact can be relatively small, particularly in early text is substantially different than what was quoted. Hope-
phases of training in inexperienced trainees compared with fully, those interested will critically review the available lit-
neurological adaptations, and so on, total hypertrophy erature in its entirety.
(myofibrillar) resulting from long-term resistance training
substantially contributes to strength development (3). Evi- Michael H. Stone
dence from both early muscle activation and CSA studies Director, Exercise and Sport Science Lab
and later studies (4) indicates that initial gains (up to Sports, Exercise, Recreation and Kinesiology
6–8 wk) in hypertrophy (myofibrillar) are small and likely Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education
do not contribute markedly to increased strength. This evi- East Tennessee State University
dence also suggests that later alterations (~4–8 wk) in CSA
Johnson City, TN
(myofibrillar) can begin to contribute to alterations in strength
and related characteristics.
Kent Adams
Kinesiology Department
TRAINING VARIATION Exercise Physiology Lab
CSU Monterey Bay, CA
Buckner et al. (5) suggest that there is minimal evidence
Seaside, CA
supporting the use of variation in resistance training program-
ming or periodization. It should be noted that individuals can-
not tolerate high-volume and/or heavy multijoint exercise Caleb Bazyler
loading for extended periods without experiencing nonfunc- Sports, Exercise, Recreation and Kinesiology
tional overreaching or overtraining syndrome. Center of Excellence for Sport Science and coach Education
Altering fitness phase order (therefore programming) pro- East Tennessee State University
duces different outcomes, sometimes subtle, but different (6). Johnson City, TN
Researchers in early studies examined programming variation
versus various constant repetition programming schemes and Clive Brewer
demonstrated that the variation groups produced superior ad- Director of Performance
aptations. Furthermore, a recent systematic review indicates Columbus Crew
that using the same training stimulus for >6 wk, especially in Columbus, OH

2047

Copyright © 2020 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
George Beckham Performance Team Director
SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS

Assistant Professor, Kinesiology Department Jayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory


CSU, Monterey Bay University of Kansas
Seaside, CA Lawrence, KS
Kevin Carroll
Andrew Galpin
Sports, Exercise, Recreation and Kinesiology
Co-Director: Center for Sport Performance
Center of Excellence for Sport Science and coach Education
East Tennessee State University Director: Biochemistry & Molecular
Johnson City, TN Exercise Physiology Lab
California State University
Robert D. Chetlin Fullerton, CA
Department of Sports Medicine
Mercyhurst University John Garhammer
Erie, PA Professor Emeritius
California State University
Paul Comfort Long Beach, CA
Directorate of Psychology and Sport
University of Salford Daniel Gahreman
Salford, Greater Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM College of Health and Human Sciences
Centre for Exercise and Sport Science Research Charles Darwin University
Edith Cowan University Darwin, NT, AUSTRALIA
Joondalup, AUSTRALIA
Casuarina NT, AUSTRALIA
Bret Comstock
Department of Exercise Science Stuart Guppy
Bloomsburg University Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research
Bloomsburg, PA Edith Cowan University
Joondalup, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Aaron Cunanan
Sports Science Coordinator G. Gregory Haff
San Francisco Giants Professor of Strength and Conditioning
Course Coordinator Masters of Exercise Science
Brad DeWeese (Strength & Conditioning)
Sports, Exercise, Recreation and Kinesiology Edith Cowan University
Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education Joondalup, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
East Tennessee State University
Johnson City, TN
Keijo Häkkinen
Neuromuscular Research Center
Jacob E. Earp
University of Rhode Island Biology of Physical Activity
Kingston, RI Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences
University of Jyväskylä, FINLAND
Sandor Dorgo
Department of Kinesiology Disa Hatfield
The University of Texas at El Paso Department of Kinesiology
El Paso, TX University of Rhode Island
Kingston, RI
Steven J. Fleck
FlecksRx LL
Cody Haun
Speed Center Sport Science Coordinator
Andrew C. Fry Exercise Science
Exercise Physiology Graduate Program Lagrange College
Dir. of Research, Research & Coaching LaGrange, GA

2048 Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine http://www.acsm-msse.org

Copyright © 2020 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Guy Hornsby Nicholas Ratamess

SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS
Coaching and Performance Science School of Nursing, Health, and Exercise Science
College of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences The College of New Jersey
West Virginia University Morganton, WV Ewing, NJ

Chad Kersick Hugo Santana


Exercise Science College of Education, Federal University of
Exercise and Performance Nutrition Laboratory Mato Grosso Do Sul,
School of Health Sciences Avenida Costa E Silva, Campo Grande,
Lindenwood University Mato Grosso do Sul, BRAZIL
St. Charles, MO
Margaret E. Stone
William J. Kraemer Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education
East Tennessee State University
Department of Human Sciences
Johnson City, TN
Program Area: Kinesiology
The Ohio State University
Timothy J. Suchomel
Columbus, OH
Department of Human Movement Sciences
Carroll University
Hugh Lamont
Department of Kinesiology Coastal Carolina University Dylan Suarez
Conway, SC Sports, Exercise, Recreation and Kinesiology
Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education
Jeff McBride East Tennessee State University
College of Health Sciences Johnson City, TN
Department of Health & Exercise Science
Director: Neuromuscular & Biomechanics Laboratory Kyle Travis
Appalachian State University Sports, Exercise, Recreation and Kinesiology
Boone, NC Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education
East Tennessee State University, Johnson City
Satoshi Mizuguchi
Sports, Exercise, Recreation and Kinesiology Chris Taber
Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education Exercise Science
East Tennessee State University College of Health Professions
Johnson City, TN Sacred Heart University
Fairfield, CT
Robert U. Newton
Exercise Medicine, Exercise Medicine Research Institute N. Travis Triplett
Edith Cowan University Exercise Science
Exercise Science Undergraduate Program Director
Joondalup, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Department of Health and Exercise Science
Appalachian State University
Kyle Pierce
Boone, NC
Kinesiology and Health Science
Louisiana State University at Shreveport
Jakob Vingren
Chair Department of Kinesiology, Health Promotion
Michael W. Ramsey and Recreation
Department of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology Professor of Exercise Physiology and Biological Sciences
Center of Excellence for Sport Science and coach Education Co-Director Applied Physiology Laboratory
East Tennessee State University University of North Texas
Johnson City, TN Denton, TX

LETTER TO THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® 2049

Copyright © 2020 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
John Wagle 3. Maden-Wilkinson TM, Balshaw TG, Massey G, et al. What makes
SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS

long-term resistance-trained individuals so strong? A comparison of


Performance Science/Player Development skeletal muscle morphology, architecture, and joint mechanics. J Appl
Kansas City Royals Physiol (1985). 2020;128(4):1000–11.
Surprise, AZ 4. DeFreitas JM, Beck TW, Stock MS, et al. An examination of the time
course of training-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Eur J Appl
Physiol. 2011;111(11):2785–90.
Dan Wathen 5. Fry AC, Kraemer WJ, van Borselen F, et al. Performance decrements
Athletic Trainer Emeritus with high-intensity resistance exercise overtraining. Med Sci Sports
Youngstown State University Exerc. 1994;26(9):1165–73.
6. Cunanan AJ, DeWeese BH, Wagle JP, et al. The general adaptation
Youngstown, OH syndrome: a foundation for the concept of periodization. Sports Med.
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002347 2018;48(4):787–97.
7. Thompson SW, Rogerson D, Ruddock A, et al. The effective-
ness of two methods of prescribing load on maximal strength
REFERENCES development: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2020;50(5):
1. Buckner SL, Jessee MB, Mouser JG, et al. The basics of training for 919–38.
muscle size and strength: a brief review on the theory. Med Sci Sports 8. Carroll KM, Bazyler CD, Bernards JR, et al. Skeletal muscle fiber ad-
Exerc. 2020;52(3):645–53. aptations following resistance training using repetition maximums or
2. Morehouse LE, Miller AT. Physiology of Exercise. C.V. Mosby; 1976. relative intensity. Sports. 2019;7(7). pii: E169.

2050 Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine http://www.acsm-msse.org

Copyright © 2020 by the American College of Sports Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Вам также может понравиться