Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PLATE 1
Biotin
mly
10-6 Glucose
I per cent
O.l$
Cystine 0.05 (0.02)$ Choline lo- 6 Penicillin 0.0057
Glutaminejj 2.0 (1.0)s Folic acid 10-G Streptomycin 0.0057
are shown in Table I. When the culture flasks (1) were inoculated with
100,000 to 200,000 cells and when, 24 hours later, after the cells had ad-
hered to the glass, the overlying fluid was replaced with a glutamine-defi-
cient medium, the cells died within a few days. However, if glutamine
were added to the medium, and if fresh glutamine were then added each
time the culture fluid was changed, the cells rapidly grew out to form a
solid sheet on the surface of the glass. The growth in the presence of the
I/--- I 7
L- GLUTAMIN E
HELA CELL
glutamine and the early death of the cultures in its absenceare illustrated
for the HeLa cell in Figs. 1 to 3 and for the mouse fibroblast in Figs. 4 to 7.
Inefectiveness of n-Glutamine-With the twelve essential amino acids,
only the L isomers had been found active; the n-amino acids were wholly
inactive, but even a large excess did not inhibit the growth response to
the L isomer. Similarly, n-glutamine had no growth-promoting effect on
either cell line. The courtesy of Dr. Alton Meister and Dr. Leon Levin-
tow in providing this compound for study is gratefully acknowledged.
Quantitative Glutamine Requirement-Glutamine in various concentra-
tions was added to the medium of Table I at the time of the first feeding.
At each subsequent feeding (every 2 days in the case of the mouse fibro-
blast and daily in the case of the HeLa cell) freshly prepared glutamine
solutions were added in appropriate concentration to t’he culture fluids.
610 GROWTH RESPONSE OF MAMMALIAN CELLS
Typical growth response curves are shown in the top sections of Tables II
and III. The concentration which permitted maximal growth of the HeLa
cell under the conditions of the present experiments was 1 to 2 mM, while
TABLE II
Growth Response* of Human Carcinoma Cell (HeLa) to Glutamine and to Glutamic Acid
-
Concentration of r,-glutamine or L-glutamic acid, nm
-
Supplement to
medium of Table I 40 1 30 I 20 I 10 1 5 1 2 1 1 1 0.5 / 0.2 I 0.1 I 0
L-Glutamic 7.7
acid + 8.9
NH&l 4.4 0.3 0.2
(1 mM) 10.7 9.6 0.9
a somewhat lower concentration (0.2 to 0.5 mM) sufficed for the optimal
growth of the mouse fibroblast. The rate of growth of the HaLa cell at
varying concentrations of glutamine is presented in Text-fig. 1, which
shows the maximal response obtained at a concentration of 1 to 2 mM.
L-Glutamic Acid As Substitute for Glutamine-With the HeLa cell,
L-glutamic acid could be substituted for glutamine, but the optimal con-
centration was 20 mM, approximately 10 to 2Q times the maximally effective
EAGLE, OYAMA, LEVY, HORTON, AND FLEISCHMAN 611
TEXT-FIG. 2. The rate of growth of the HeLa cell at optimal levels of L-glutamine
and L-glutamic acid (with and without NH&l and ATP). 0, glutamic acid (20 mM) ;
0, glutamic acid + NH&l (1 mM) + ATP (2 y per ml.); a, glutamine (2 mM); 0,
glutamine + glutamic acid + NHhCl + ATP.
However, quite different results were obtained with the mouse fibro-
blast. When this cell was grown in a medium containing only twelve es-
sential amino acids but no glutamine, glutamic acid alone in any concen-
tration in the range 0.1 to 40 mM failed to substitute for glutamine (lower
portion of Table III). The cells did not multiply and after 6 days showed
degenerative changes. On the addition of NH&l in the optimal concen-
tration of 1 mM, a slight growth-promoting effect was occasionally observed
(cf. Table III). The addition of ATP at concentrations of 0.5 to 2 y per
ml. again had no effect, and higher concentrations were toxic.
It is of interest that Fischer (5) had found that the addition of approxi-
mately 1.5 mM glutamine to a medium consisting of dialyzed serum, di-
alyzed embryo extract, dialyzed plasma, Tyrode’s solution, glycine, and
cystine greatly increased the area of growth around a culture explant.
612 GROWTH RESPONSE OF MAMMALIAN CELLS
Glutamic acid at the same concentration was, however, inactive and actu-
ally caused a slight retardation of growth.
E$ect of Full Complement of Amino Acids on Growth Response to L-Glu-
tamine and on Growth-Promoting Activity of L-Glutamic Acid-The previ-
ously cited experiments were carried out in a medium in which the cells
TABLE III
Growth Response* of Mouse Fibroblast (Strain L) to Glutamine and Absence
of Comparable Response to Glutamic Acid, NHo~, and ATP
Supplement to
7824 ml4
Mouse fibro- 0 7.8 7.1 3.04 2.1 1.1 0.62 0.5 0.28
0.2 6.6 6.0 3.1 1.8 1.4 0.7 0.11
It was not surprising that glutamine should prove essential for the sur-
vival and growth of mammalian cells in a medium containing only twelve
essential amino acids, glucose, protein, and the necessary vitamin supple-
ment. It was, however, not anticipated that glutamic acid would be only
one-tenth to one-twentieth as active as glutamine in the case of the HeLa
614 GROWTH RESPONSE OF MAMMALIAN CELLS
cell and usually devoid of activity in the case of the L cell. The simplest
explanation is that these two cells are relatively impermeable to glutamic
acid. However, as will be discussed in a following paper, in media con-
taining as little as 0.01 to 0.1 pmole per ml. of C14-labeled glutamic acid,
the latter was actively incorporated int’o cell protein by both types of cells,
whether in the presence or absence of glutamine, and the concentration of
free glutamic acid in the cell was regularly much greater than that in the
surrounding fluid.
An alternative explanation which is consistent with all the data reported
here is that, at least under the conditions of the present experiments, and
in conformity with the findings of McIlwain et al. (6) with Xtreptococcus
SUMMARY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
6. McIlwain, H., Fildes, P., Gladstone, G. P., and Knight, B. C. J. G., Rio&em.
J., 33, 223 (1939). McIlwain, H., Biochem. J., 33, 1942 (1939).
7. Krebs, H. A., Biochem. J., 43, 51 (1948).
8. Elliott, W. H., Nature, 161,128 (1948); Biochem. J., 49,106 (1951); J. Biol. Chem.,
201, 661 (1953).
9. Speck, J. F., J. Biol. Chem., 179, 1405 (1949).
10. Stetten, M. R., J. Biol. Chem., 189, 499 (1951).
11. Meister, A., and Tice, S. V., J. Biol. Chem., 187, 173 (1950).
12. Meister, A., Sober, H. A., Tice, S. V., and Fraser, P. E., J. RioZ. Chem., 197, 319
(1952).
13. Mardashev, S. R., and Semina, L. A., Doklady Akad. Nauk S. S. S. R., 74, 537
(1950), cited by Meister, A., in McElroy, W. D., and Glass, B., Amino acid
metabolism, Baltimore (1955).
EXPLANATION OF PLATE 1
FIGS. 1 TO 3. The 6 day growth response of the HeLa cell to varying concentra-
tions of n-glutamine (in the basal medium of Table I). Magnification, 100 X.
FIGS. 4 TO 7. The 6 day growth response of the mouse fibroblast to varying con-
centrations of n-glutamine (in the basal medium of Table I). Magnification, 110 X.
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 218 PLATE 1
(Eagle, Oyama, Levy, Horton, and Fleisohman: Growth response of mammrtlian cells)
THE GROWTH RESPONSE OF
MAMMALIAN CELLS IN TISSUE
CULTURE TO l-GLUTAMINE AND
l-GLUTAMIC ACID
Harry Eagle, Vance I. Oyama, Mina Levy,
Clara L. Horton and Ralph Fleischman
J. Biol. Chem. 1956, 218:607-616.
Alerts:
• When this article is cited
• When a correction for this article is posted