Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ERH 207w-02
Dr. Richter
11/3/2020
Suicide is one of the most terrible sins one can commit. From a purely Christian
arguments fall under his belief in soft determinism. Hume believes that human behavior is
controlled and guided by God, but there is a choice in terms of the capacity of a person to act
based on their nature. Personally, libertarianism makes more sense. Libertarianism is the belief
that humans have a choice regardless of nature or nurture. This shift in view is what makes
Hume’s arguments not work out entirely. The impact of suicide can affect friends, families, and
even communities. When one considers suicide as an option, they are in an unclear state of mind
and should not take action based on their feelings. David Hume has made objections claiming the
act of suicide does not necessarily fall into the category of harm against God, society, and self.
Hume claims that suicide does not conflict with our duty to God. Basically, it’s saying
that if God didn’t want people to commit suicide, then he wouldn’t have let them be able to do so
in the first place. Given that old school Christian thought judges suicide as evil, this issue can be
looked at through the lens of the problem of evil. Basically, the problem of evil claims that God
cannot be all good, all-powerful, or all-knowing if evil is allowed to persist. The answer that
makes the most sense would be that humans are given free will. If the perspective is changed to a
more libertarian view, decisions can be made from the human rather than something that is
planned. The orthodox church believes that suicide is a separation from God and faith. It
wouldn’t make sense if God wanted people to separate from him. Therefore, it’s more rational to
assume there is free will and decision making abilities in humans that can affect their destinies.
God makes it clear that murdering and rape is a sin yet people do it anyway, so it’s irrational to
assume that just because we are capable of acting in a way does not necessarily mean it’s good.
Therefore, my answer would be because humans have the choice to do so they should choose the
path that would result in the most good being spread. The same answer is applied to suicide. Bad
decisions are made that cause people to go down a route that ends in their own self-murder.
Overall, if libertarianism is true then suicide is most definitely against the will of God.
Under certain circumstances, Hume believes that suicide is beneficial for society. Hume
supposes that if a person is no longer able to do good for society, is a burden to society, or is
getting in the way of someone else being more useful for society, then it is not only ok but in fact
praiseworthy for them to commit suicide. Supposing Hume is talking about Euthanasia for
patients in hospice, I would actually agree on this point. If there is a patient in hospice, they are
there because death is a closer inevitability than it is for most. Ensuring a passage to the afterlife
in the most painless way possible is the most moral position because there is less suffering
involved. When Hume talks about criminals committing suicide for the greater good, I would
have to disagree. Granted, some deserve the death penalty because they are the vilest types of
people, but there’s no reason to believe those people would take their own lives by choice. Those
kinds of people would rarely consider suicide because they are sick and twisted. Those that do
consider suicide as a result of their actions may in fact have the potential to be saved. Hitler
killed himself because he knew he thought he would have been executed at the Nuremburg trials,
but that’s not set in stone. If Hitler didn’t kill himself and was captured and imprisoned, but
never killed there’s no way we could know he wouldn’t have a change of mind. It can be said
that considering suicide is a recognition of wrongdoing. A person can feel remorse for their
actions and may believe that the best solution is to create good by getting rid of themselves,
which they realize is bad. People are never truly black and white. Just because someone makes a
mistake, doesn’t mean they can never redeem themselves. As much as people are capable of evil,
they are just as capable of good. For every Hitler, there’s a Mother Teressa. It’s possible to argue
that saving one from suicide no matter how deplorable they seem may serve as a long term good
for society. Just like how a junkie can be rehabilitated and drop their addiction, criminals can be
rehabilitated and become good. In doing so, they are more capable of helping others to do the
same. This can be a net positive to society. Once again, this argument stems from libertarianism
in that becoming a criminal is a decision you make rather than destiny for some people.
Decisions can be made to change the future, but determinism would have the future set
regardless of choice.
Hume’s final claim is that suicide is not doing great harm against self. Though Hume does
not actually mean this, on a physical level this is factually incorrect. Every method of suicide is
meant to damage some part of the body, so saying it’s not harmful physically is wrong. Hume
instead says that it is ethical to do so if you are already living in constant pain and misery. As
was stated before, if there is nothing that can be done, then it is best to let nature take its course
as painlessly as possible. With that being said, if there is something to be done about the state of
circumstances, then it should be done to better one’s life. If the circumstances spell misfortune, it
doesn’t mean that it’s permanent. Just because you lose all of your wealth, doesn’t mean it’s
impossible to gain it back. Rather than giving up and committing suicide, it would be a lot more
rational to try and better the situation for yourself. Hume writes that suicide can be an example
set that “…would preserve to everyone his chance for happiness in life, and effectively free him
from all risk of misery” (Hume). Misery is an inevitability to life. Rain will pour and you will get
wet and cold, but that doesn’t mean there’s no chance to get dry and warm. Even if the chance of
something happening to turn the tide of fortune is very minuscule, it’s seldom zero. The
probability of something bad happening may be significant, but to ignore the probability of
something good happening is ridiculous and irrational because it’s zoning in on a narrow and
negative point of view. This puts you in an unnatural state of mind that would cause you to make
decisions that would be considered bad. Terminal illness and fatal wounds are a different matter
altogether, since at that point the physical body is leading to the inevitable shut down. If it’s a
matter of killing oneself over spiritual or mental weakness, then it’s not justified at all because
there is a possibility of recovery. Overall, Hume’s argument about suicide not causing harm to
Hume does make good cases in what he says. I agree with him on his views that suicide as
a stigma arose mainly from superstition in Roman, French, and European civilizations. That is
not to say that there aren’t rational reasons as to why suicide is not justified. Hume making
claims about suicide not being against God’s will is against the beliefs of modern orthodox
thought. Hume’s claims about suicide not being against society don’t take into account the
potential for a net good if suicide is avoided. Finally, Hume’s claim about suicide not being
against the self is wrong physically as well as mentally. Granted determinism is what drives
Hume’s arguments to work, but the slight change in perspective can change the context of the
arguments.
Works Cited: