Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
By Gabe Farajollah
Many economists and investors are predicting widespread inflation, following the
trillions of dollars of stimulus recently pumped into the economy. As a result, in this post
I look at the merits of investing in gold and companies with pricing power as hedges
against a weakening U.S. dollar.
Historically, there has been a strong negative correlation between the value of the U.S.
dollar and gold; as the dollar weakens, gold appreciates and vice versa. With this in mind,
a handful of investors have reasoned that since inflation typically follows an increase in
the monetary supply, our currency will weaken and there is the possibility that gold, to a
certain degree, will supplant the U.S. dollar as the world's preferred reserve currency (see
India's recent $6.7 billion purchase of gold from the International Monetary Fund). If this
does not happen, many think that the demand for gold should at the very least increase
from its levels today. To take advantage of such a phenomenon, several fund managers,
such as David Einhorn, have purchased the commodity and opted to pay for its storage,
rather than buying gold ETFs such as GLD, which have a costlier expense fee. Yet, as a
value investor, I am somewhat hesitant to invest directly in gold, as I cannot determine
what it is worth and thus purchase it with a margin of safety. Remember, an investment is
theoretically worth the present value of future cash flows; since gold has minimal
fundamental purpose and yields no money it is difficult to assign it a definitive value.
One alternative to this is to invest directly in companies, such as miners, which stand to
profit from an increase in the price of the commodity. This is precisely what John
Paulson is doing with the recent launch of his gold-only hedge fund. However, one must
realize that even deriving a value for such companies is somewhat speculative, as their
expected profits are largely dependent on the price of gold. All in all, most gold related
investments carry a risk that is tied to the future amount that people are willing to pay for
the commodity.
Fortunately, large organizations with wide economic moats have not appreciated as much
as smaller companies because investors have recently opted for riskier and more cyclical
assets. As Greenwald points out, currently "the best bargains are in franchise businesses,"
as they are providing "8% to 11% and in some cases 13% to 14% sustainable earnings
returns." As for gold, although it is trading slightly below its peak price of $1,227.50, it is
rather inexpensive in terms of historic inflation-adjusted numbers, which translate gold's
$873 per-ounce price in 1980 to above $2,200 in today's dollars. So which investment
strategy is preferable considering the price of gold and equities today? While there is no
definitive answer, strong cases can be made for adding a moderate amount of both to
one's portfolio. Companies with pricing power should appreciate regardless of the
macroeconomic environment, and gold, despite being hard to value, has typically been
one of the best hedges against inflation.