Volume 6, Issue 1, January – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165

A Matrix Property for Comparative Assessment of

subsets of Complex Matrices characterized by a given
set of Global Mass and Global Alignment Factors
Debopam Ghosh

Abstract:- The present research article develops a Matrix

Property that provides a comparative analysis and
 e 1 , e2 ,...., em  denotes the standard Orthonormal
assessment of Matrices belonging to appropriately defined and  f , f ,...., f  denotes the
m
basis in C 1 2 n
subsets of the Complex matrix space M mn (C ) , from a n
standard Orthonormal basis in C
nonlinear perspective. The associated Mathematical
framework is developed and the introduced concepts and  c  denotes the complex conjugate of the complex number
terminologies Illustrated with appropriate Numerical c
Examples.  v1 
v 
Keywords:- Global Mass Factor of a Matrix, Global  2 p p
 V   .  , V  [v1 v2 . . v p ]1 p , B  bij  , V B V   bij vi v j
Alignment Factor of a Matrix, Effective Global Mass Factor of    
a Matrix, Total Mass associated with a Matrix, Component   p p
i 1 j 1
Mass portions associated with a Matrix. .
v p 
Notations   p1

 M mn (C ) denotes the Complex Matrix space of Matrices

I. INTRODUCTION
of order m by n
 R( A) denotes the Global Mass Factor associated with the The present research article discusses a Matrix property
matrix Amn defined on subsets of the Complex Matrix space M mn (C ) ,
 C ( A) denotes the Global Alignment Factor associated which are characterized by the ordered pair of the Global Mass
Factor and the Global Alignment Factor associated with the
with the matrix Amn
matrix, denoted as ( R, C ) . This matrix property, denoted as
 R0 ( A) denotes the Effective Global Mass Factor  , provides a comparative analysis of the intrinsic structural
associated with the matrix Amn aspects of the matrices belonging to the particular set, from the
standpoint of the effect of the individual and overall modulus
 H ( A) denotes the Fundamental Matrix associated with
terms of the matrix elements, and overlap of the phase terms
the matrix Amn associated with Individual matrix elements, the phase terms
determine the overall alignment, i.e. orientation relative to the
 mˆ ( A) denotes the Total mass of the matrix Amn
 ,  basis of C
2
, the individual modulus terms
 ˆ ( A), ˆ ( A) denote the Component mass portions
  determine the Global mass factor and the Effective Global
associated with the matrix Amn mass factor associated with the matrix, which in turn, plays
role in determining the distribution of the total mass associated
1 1 1 1 with the matrix into Component mass portions. However, 
  ( )   and   ( )  
2 1 2  1 being a nonlinear transformation, the presented mathematical
framework addresses an issue of Matrix analysis from a
 c denotes the modulus of the complex number c nonlinear perspective, which can reveal intricacies of Matrix
arrays that may not be apparent under a strictly linear
algebraic approach to Matrix array structural analysis.

IJISRT21JAN335 www.ijisrt.com 599

Volume 6, Issue 1, January – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
II. MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORK AND m n
ASSOCIATED ANALYSIS  x   ij (1  exp(rij )) , where we have :
i 1 j 1
m n
x( A)  (0,1), A  M (r , c)
A  M mn (C ), A   aij ei fj , we have the
rij m n
 ij  ( ) , where r   rij , is the numerical
i 1 j 1
following: r i 1 j 1
realization of the Global Mass factor R( A)
aij  rij cij , Where rij  aij , therefore we have rij  0,
Therefore, ij  0, i  1, 2,..m; j  1, 2,...., n and
cij  C , cij  1 , we consider the following convention that m n

in the case of zero matrix elements of matrix A :  

i 1 j 1
ij 1
aij  0  rij  0, cij  1
m n
 y   ij (1  exp(rij )) , where we have:
We define the Global Mass Factor ( R( A) ), the Effective i 1 j 1

Global Mass Factor ( R0 ( A) ) and the Global Alignment y( A)  (0,1), A  M (r, c)

Factor C ( A) , associated with the Matrix Amn :  1 2 
( 2 )( x  y )
2
xy 
m n m n  Q( A)    , A  M (r , c)
R( A)   rij , R0 ( A)   rij (1  exp(rij )) ,  xy
1 2 2 
( )( x  y )
i 1 j 1 i 1 j 1  2 
m n , and we have the following associated Matrix :
C ( A)  c11c12 ....c1n c21c22 ....c2 n .........cm1cm 2 ....cmn   cij
i 1 j 1

 1 2 
1  ( 2 )( x  y )
2
Clearly C( A)  C, C( A)  1, A  M mn (C) xy 
H ( A)  I 22  Q( A)   
 xy
1 2 2 
1  ( )( x  y )
We define the set M (r , c) as follows:  2 
M (r, c)  M mn (C), M (r, c)   A  M mn (C) | A  0mn , R( A)  r, C( A)  c
, where we have the condition: r  0, c  C, c  1 H ( A) is Hermitian, Positive Definite, A  M (r , c)
We now define the following derived properties, based on the
properties defined above, as following:
The Matrix H ( A) has the following Spectral decomposition:
r
 ij  ( ij )(1  exp(rij )), where H ( A)  ˆ ( A)    ˆ ( A)   , where the
r0
m n
eigenvalues of H ( A) , termed as the Component Mass
r0   rij (1  exp(rij )) , is the numerical portions of the Matrix Amn , has the following expressions:
i 1 j 1

realization of the Effective Global Mass factor R0 ( A) 1

ˆ ( A)  1  ( )( x  y ) 2 and
2
Therefore, ij  0, i  1, 2,..m; j  1, 2,...., n and 1
m n ˆ ( A)  1  ( )( x  y ) 2
 
2
ij 1
i 1 j 1
We have: 1  ˆ ( A)  ˆ ( A)  3

IJISRT21JAN335 www.ijisrt.com 600

Volume 6, Issue 1, January – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
ˆ ( A) , is
The Total mass of the Matrix Amn , denoted as m  2 0 0
2) B    , we have the following summary of
defined as the trace of the Matrix H ( A) :  0 0 0  23
the numerical values for the matrix
ˆ ( A)  ˆ ( A)  ˆ ( A)  2  ( x2  y 2 )
m
properties under consideration:

c  r ( B)  2 c( B)  1
We define the vector C0  ( 1 )  , where , ,
2 c  r0 ( B)  2(1  exp(2))  1.7293 .....(up to 4
C0  C 2 , C0 C0  1 , c is the Numerical realization of decimal places)
 x( B)  y ( B)  (1  exp(2))  0.8647 .....(up to 4
the Global Alignment Factor C ( A)
decimal places)
We finally define the Matrix property of Interest through the  mˆ ( B)  2[1  (1  exp(2)) ]  3.4953
2
.....(up to 4
following Nonlinear Transformation  : decimal places)
 ˆ ( B)  1 , ˆ ( B)  1  2(1  exp(2))2  2.4953
 : M ( r , c) 1,3) , such that: .....(up to 4 decimal places)
( A)  C0 H ( A) C0 ˆ ( B) ˆ ( B)
 ( ) 100  71.39 , ( ) 100  28.61
mˆ ( B) mˆ ( B)
.....(up to 2 decimal places)
Numerical Examples
1 1
 C0    
1 0 0  2 1
1) A    , we have the following summary of
0 1 0  23  ( B)  ˆ ( B)  1  2(1  exp(2))  2.4953
2

the numerical values for the matrix properties considered as .....(up to 4 decimal places)
part of the presented mathematical framework:
Therefore, A, B  M (r  2, c  1), ( A)  ( B)
 r ( A)  2 , c ( A)  1 ,
r0 ( A)  2(1  exp(1))  1.2642 .... (up to 4
decimal places) III. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
 x( A)  y ( A)  (1  exp(1))  0.6321 .....(up to 4
decimal places) The Matrix property  provides a comparative,
 mˆ ( A)  2[1  (1  exp(1)) ]  2.7992
2
.....(up to 4 quantitative assessment of the Structural intricacies of
decimal places) matrices belonging to any such set M (r , c) , where
 ˆ ( A)  1 , ˆ ( A)  1  2(1  exp(1))2  1.7992 r  0, c  1 , In the Numerical example considered above,
.....(up to 4 decimal places)
both the matrices belong to the same subset M (r  2, c  1)
ˆ ( A) ˆ ( A)
 ( ) 100  64.27 , ( ) 100  35.73 but they are observed to be associated with significantly
mˆ ( A) mˆ ( A) different mass portion distributions owing to different
.....(up to 2 decimal places) distribution of and contributions from the constituent matrix
1 1 elements. In subsequent studies, the Matrix property  will
 C0     be analyzed in more depth to understand more clearly its scope
2 1 and limitations towards its applicability in real life
 ( A)  ˆ ( A)  1  2(1  exp(1))  1.7992
2 Theoretical/Computational problems.

.....(up to 4 decimal places)

IJISRT21JAN335 www.ijisrt.com 601

Volume 6, Issue 1, January – 2021 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
REFERENCES Research Articles

Books: [1]. Brewer, J. W., Kronecker Products and Matrix Calculus

in System Theory, IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems,
[1]. Anderson, T.W., An Introduction to Multivariate 25, No.9, p 772-781 (1978)
Statistical Analysis, 3rd Edition, Wiley-India Edition. [2]. Dorai, Kavita, Mahesh, T. S., Arvind and Anil Kumar,
[2]. Arfken, George B., and Weber, Hans J., Mathematical Quantum computation using NMR, Current Science,
Methods for Physicists, 6th Edition, Academic Press Vol.79, No. 10, p 1447-1458 (2000)
[3]. Biswas, Suddhendu, Textbook of Matrix Algebra, 3rd [3]. Ghosh Debopam, Determination of the Most Stable
Edition, PHI Learning Private Limited Configuration Pair(s) of the Constituent Matrix Shells
[4]. Datta, B. N., Numerical Linear Algebra and and the Set of Most Stable Configurations of the
Applications, SIAM Corresponding Matrix Shell System, International Journal
[5]. Ghosh, Debopam, A Tryst with Matrices: The Matrix of Innovative Science and Research Technology, Volume
Shell Model Formalism, 24by7 Publishing, India. 5, Issue 8, p 1080 - 1093 (2020)
[6]. Graham, Alexander, Kronecker Products & Matrix [4]. Ipsen, Ilse C. F., and Meyer, Carl D., The Angle Between
Calculus with Applications, Dover Publications, Inc. Complementary Subspaces, NCSU Technical Report
[7]. Hassani, Sadri, Mathematics Physics A Modern #NA-019501, Series 4.24.667 (1995)
Introduction to its Foundations, Springer [5]. Macklin, Philip A., Normal matrices for physicists,
[8]. Haykin, Simon, Neural Networks A Comprehensive American Journal of Physics, 52, 513(1984)
Foundation, 2nd Edition, Pearson Education, Inc. [6]. Paris, Matteo G A, The modern tools of Quantum
[9]. Hogben, Leslie, (Editor), Handbook of Linear Algebra, Mechanics : A tutorial on quantum states, measurements
Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor and Francis Group and operations, arXiv: 1110.6815v2 [ quant-ph ] (2012)
[10]. Johnson, Richard. A., and Wichern, Dean. W., Applied [7]. Roth, W. E., On Direct Product Matrices, Bull. Amer.
Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 6th Edition, Pearson Math. Soc., No. 40, p 461-468 (1944)
International
[11]. Jordan, Thomas. F., Quantum Mechanics in Simple
Matrix Form, Dover Publications, Inc.
[12]. Meyer, Carl. D., Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear
Algebra, SIAM
[13]. Nakahara, Mikio, and Ohmi, Tetsuo, Quantum
Computing: From Linear Algebra to Physical
Realizations, CRC Press.
[14]. Rao, A. Ramachandra., and Bhimasankaram, P., Linear
Algebra, 2nd Edition, Hindustan Book Agency
[15]. Rencher, Alvin. C., and Schaalje, G. Bruce., Linear
Models in Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,
Publication
[16]. Sakurai, J. J., Modern Quantum Mechanics, Pearson
Education, Inc.
[17]. Steeb, Willi-Hans, and Hardy, Yorick, Problems and
Solutions in Quantum Computing and Quantum
Information, World Scientific
[18]. Strang, Gilbert, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 4th
Edition, Cengage Learning
[19]. Sundarapandian, V., Numerical Linear Algebra, PHI
Learning Private Limited

IJISRT21JAN335 www.ijisrt.com 602