the Fundraising

Member, Bob has seen every Drayton productionand participated

on
not a Board
Cabinet for the St. Jacobs Country Playhouse. He became Secretary to the Board rn 2006 and

Secretary-Treasurerin 2008.

Dragon Entertainment Senior Management Team

Alex Mustakas (Founding & Current Artistic Director, Drayton Entertainment)
Under tutelage, Drayton Entertainment
þÿAlex s has grown from a summer stock theatre company

entertaining 14,591 patrons to an institution of national acclaim, with an attendance surpassing200,000

at six venues across Ontario. Alex has directed over 70 productions since the þÿorgarrization1991 s
inaugural season. Alex holds a BA and Honorary Doctorate from Wilfrid Laurier University, along
with a þÿMaster s Degree in Arts Administration from City University of London, England.

Peter Black
(GeneralManager)
As Manager, Peter provides strategic support to the Artistic Director and is responsiblefor
General
ensuring that all projects relating to capital upgradesat each venue are supervisedand completedon
time, and on budget. Previously, Peter was Vice President of the EngineeredSolutions Division of
Weber Supply in Kitchener, where he was responsiblefor many of the þÿcornpanylargest s customers

and over thirty million dollars in revenue. He is a results-oriented professionalwith demonstrated

hands-on experiencein business development, sales administration, and operations.
Steven Karcher (ExecutiveDirector)
As Executive Director, Steven providesstrategicsupport to the Artistic Director and is responsiblefor
ensuring that all reports, applications,and communications are clear and accurate representationsof

Drayton Entertainment. Steven has been employedwith Drayton Entertainment for l0 years, and has a

Joumalism background.
Frank J. D. Parks, C.A. (Director of Finance)
Frank Parks has spent the last eight years overseeingall financial, accounting and information systems
for Drayton Entertainment. This included spearheadingthe successful introduction, training and
ongoing programming and maintenance of PASS2, the computerized box office system used at the
theatre. Frank received an Honours Bachelor of Business Administration from Wilfrid Laurier
University before pursuing his Chartered Accountancy.
Simon Day (Director of Production)
Simon Day is the Director of Production for Drayton Entertainment. He is responsiblefor all technical
aspects of all productions producedin all venues throughoutour season. A graduateof Niagara
College Technical Theatre he has worked in all areas of technical theatre for the last 20 years. Simon
has designed lighting for over 200 productions in additional to working as a Technical Director,
Production Managerand General Manager.

Steve Roth (Executive Producer)

As Executive Producer, Steve Roth brings decades of experienceto the role. A graduateof the Radio
and Television BroadcastingProgram at ConestogaCollege, Steve is a former Administrative Director
of the School for the Performing Arts at The Centre in The Square. He is also founder and former
General Manager of The Waterloo StageTheatre for eight seasons.

Ellen (Director of Audience Services)

Berwick
Ellen Berwick responsiblefor overseeingall front line operationsthat impact the visitor experience
is
at each venue, including box office, house management, and loungeactivities, along with staff training
to ensure Drayton þÿEntertainment s high expectationsin the iields of customer service and audience
relations are maintained. Ellen has been employedby Drayton Entertainment for the past 16 years.
'14
Large Scale Project ManagementTrack Record

Drayton Festival Theatre ($1.5 Million)

and technical upgradesat its
Drayton Entertainment fundraised $1.5 million for capital improvements
of an elevator, new air
historic 1902 Opera House in 1997. These renovations included the addition
administration
conditioning system, new seats in the auditorium (385),washroom reconfiguration,
space, and private loungearea for patrons.

The entire project was administered and overseen by Drayton Entertainment staff.

SuperBuiId ($520,000 Provincial Infrastructure Program)

In October 2004, Drayton Entertainment received $520,000 for the developmentof a new performing
arts complex in St. Jacobs.
the
The project was the result of a cooperativepartnershipfomted between Drayton Entertainment and
Government of Ontario with a goal of renewing and expandingþÿOntario scommunity infrastructure.
sector fundraisingto complete
Drayton Entertainment raised $2.5 million throughprivate and public
the $3.0 million project,which openedin Fall 2005.

Canadian Arts & Heritage Sustainability Program ($55,000.00Federal Program) _

Throughout 2008 and 2009, Drayton Entertainment completed all proper reporting requirements
as

of Core
requestedby the Federal Govemment for its OrganizationalRestructuring & Consolidation
and strategic
Operations project, which enabled the company to develop the necessary business
planning required for the creation and implementationof a new organizational
structure more closely
aligned with the demands of its current and future activity profile.

Ontario Arts Endowment Fund & Canadian Heritage Endowment Fund ($890,000.00)

In 2008, Drayton Entertainment invested $185,347 in its Endowment Fund, attracting þÿ matching
Federal and Provincial funds of $340,0l4.20, to bring the total 2008 investment to $525,361.20 The
þÿorganizationtotal
s Endowment Fund balances now sits at approximately$890,000.
Based on the matchingprovision benefits that have been offered to date through federal and provincial
programs, this investment is the result of only $280,259 in direct contributions (which beganin 2002)
from Drayton Entertainment.
In a normal investment period,this endowment should yield 5% in annual income meaning:
°
Original (2002-2004) investments have been financed through payouts from the fund.
°
The 2008 investment of $185,347should be financed in the next 5 years.

This business savvy demonstrates Drayton þÿEntertainment s ability and commitment to make fiscally
responsibledecisions which will pay dividends for its long-termviability and sustainability.

Official North American Touring Engagements (Dirty Rotten Scoundrels & Camelot)

Drayton Entertainment also has a demonstrated capacity to manage large scale artistic products. In
2008/09, it conceptualizedand coordinated a 22-week North American professionaltheatrical touring
opportunityof its acclaimed productionof Dirty Rotten Scoundrels. More than 120 performanceswere
booked in 28 U.S. states, along with Ontario stops in London, Hamilton, and Brampton.

27
This required Drayton Entertainment to execute:
Columbia Artists Theatricals, a
°
Sound Tour Management (the organizationcontracted
production company based in New York City to providedaily on-site supervision).
Financial Managementof Tour_ .-

°
International Press _

Its productionof Camelot is currently on a 17-week North American tour, throughMarch, 2010.

'50
 5.0 Minimum Government Reguirements

5.1 »

Demonstration newly constructed or materially rehabilitated infrastructure intended for use

that
by the public must ensure appropriateaccess for persons with disabilities, including meeting
the requirementsof the Canadian Standards Association Technical Standard Accessible Design
for the Built Environment (CAN/CSA B651-04) for new construction.

Accessibility is the bridge between laudable goals and meaningfulresults. Without it, even the most
carefully crafted projects will not ensure that Canadians with disabilities enjoy the full benefits of
Canadian society.

Drayton Entertainment is cognizant of the need to ensure that its existing facilities, as well as the
newly constructed Cambridge Perfomiing Arts Complex and consolidated operations are compliant
with the requirementsof the Canadian Standards Association Technical Standard Accessible Design
for the Built Environment.

A portion of the budget has been specifically allocated to address accessibility at several Drayton
Entertainment venues.

The advisory committee being created to oversee the new CambridgePerformingArts Complexwill:
°
Consider approaches,existing law and best practicesacross various jurisdictions,
emergingtrends in the area of accessibility,industry practicesand innovation in
research and technology.
Review data emerging trends, sector issues, practices,innovation in research and
technology.
Work from the premise that accessibility standards should ensure access for the greatest
number of people but that individual accommodation will always be required.
Understand that balancing the goal of accessibilitywith technical and cost issues are not
easy challenges.
Consider specific elements of the built environment that contributes to or create barriers
for people with disabilities when absent or improperly configured.
Discuss what the key design features and þÿ elements should be, for example,paths of
travel and washroom facilities.

Any architects engagedin the project will adhere to the CAN/CSA B651-04 standard, which specifies
technical requirementson how to make buildings and other facilities accessible and
safelyusable by
persons with physical, sensory, or cognitive disabilities.

5.2 Newly constructed or materially rehabilitated buildings must meet or exceed the energy
efficiency requirementsof the Model National Energy Code for Building, where applicable.
Drayton Entertaimnent confirms that the project will meet or exceed the energy efficiency
requirementsof the Model National Energy Code for Building, where applicable.

Drayton Entertainment is committed to sustainabledevelopment and best practice environmental

management in all its activities. When determining suppliersand project managers, the þÿcompany s
environmental objectiveswould include:
°
Conducting all activities in accordance with þÿ bestþÿpractice
and Ministry of the
Environment Regulations 102/94 and 103/94.
 Minimizing negativeenvironmental outcomes throughreducingwastes, reusing
wastes, and recycling wastes, construction impacts, emissions and other pollutants,
while minimizing energy usage.
Clearly identifying the environmental roles and responsibilities of each staff
member and/or sub-contractor(s).
Providingappropriateresources and environmental trainingcommensurate with
the roles and responsibilitiesof all personnel.
Communicatingthe þÿcompanyenvironmental
s concems and perf`orrnance
to

employees,sub-contractors, customers, and the community.

5.3 Beginning April 1, 2011, proponents of projectswith aproposedfederal contribution of above

$50 million must demonstrate how
they will use Public-PrivatePartnership(P3) procurement,
or if the project is pursuing P3 opportunities,the
not proponent must provide an explanationof
how P3s were considered and why they were not pursued.

°
N/A

5.4 Demonstration that newly constructed or materially rehabilitated infrastructure intended

complies with any requiredHeritage Assessment.
Drayton Entertainment has consulted with the City of Cambridge,and received confirmation that the
processfor a heritageassessment follows standard policy for any city project.

The City of Cambridge has verified that the theatre/consolidation facility is not required to visually
represent the same period; rather, the site plan and building must add to the heritagecontext of Galt.
It is Drayton Entertainmenfs intent that this be factored in
heritageassessment as part of the site plan
process, asrezoning application
no is required. The selected architect
with the Heritage will meet

Advisory Committee to obtain input on the scope of such assessment prior to finalizing the designof
the building. This consultation will sufficiently demonstrate that the new building is compatible with
the adjacent heritagearea in terms of scale, massing,facade,materials, etc.

5.5 Confirmation that the Special Policy Area (SPA) criteria will be met to the satisfaction of the
Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA).

There is an ongoingdialoguebetween Drayton Entertainment,the City of Cambridge,and Grand River

Conservation Authority regardingthe project to ensure that it meets the requirementsof the Special
Policy Area provisions in the Official Plan for this area.

Upon final tweaks to the project design (confirmation of adequateparking, location/accessibilityof

entrances, etc.) discussions will continue with the Grand River Conservation Authority so that it may
be determined whether any special requirements must be accommodated (such as required flood
proofing techniques) or whether there are building design deficiencies that must be resolved (such as
habitable rooms at an elevation lower than the RegulatoryFlood Line).

This will certainly be a collaborative process between Drayton Entertainment, the City of Cambridge,
and Grand River Conservation Authority, as a permit from the GRCA will not be issued until these
regulationsare satisfied, and this type of permit is applicablelaw for Building Code purposes.

20
 with any criteria for environmentally sensitive
5.6 Confirmation that the project(s)will comply
areas.

any criteria for environmentally

Drayton Entertainment confirms that the project(s)will comply with
sensitive areas.

the location of environmentally sensitive

areas. Drayton
The City of Cambridge Official Plan depicts theatre/consolidation
s taff that the location for the
Entertainment has received confirmation from city
sensitive area, nor within 30m of a water
facility is Q located within 250m of an environmentally
body.
also Q located within 30m of a
The respective parking lot for the Theatre/Consolidation facility is
water body.
for 46 Grand Ave. S.
The conclusions outlined in the March 2008 Environmental Assessment Study
accompanying this proposal cover LQ the theatre and consolidation facility.
are _rin
The Drayton Festival Theatre, Huron Country Playhouse,and St. Jacobs Country Playhouse
30m of water body. The
environmentally sensitive area, nor within
a
located within 250m of an
No further environmental
respectiveparking lots are also _not located within 30m of a water body.
assessment is needed at this time.
lot is
The King's Wharf Theatre is located within
30m of a water body (GeorgianBay). The parking
Town of Penetanguishene has confirmed that the
also located within 30m of the same water body. The
It
is zoned for "open space and institutional".
land on which the King's Wharf Theatre is situated
Wharf Theatre will be for the interior only
should be noted that all of the infrastructure for the King's
assessment is needed at this time.
there is exterior work in the proposal.No further environmental
_ng

31
 Clty of Cambridge
Grand Avenue and St. Andrews
Street Site
Supplemental Phase Il
Environmental Slte Assessment

þÿ.\\\\\N `_

Submltted to:

The Corporationof the Clty of Cambridge

73 Water St North
Cambrldge,Ontario N1 R 5W8

Submitted by :

Dillon ConsultingLlmlted
5 CherryBlossom Road, Unit 1
Cambrldge.Ontario N3H 4R7

Fil6 #06-6045

Merch 2008
 'NJ
March 31, 2008 DILLON
CONSU LTINC

City of Cambridge _

5 CherryBlossom Rd
Property Services Department Unit #1
73 Water Street N., 4th Floor
Ontario
Cambridge,
Cambridge,ON NIR 7L6
Canada

NSH 4R7

Telephone
Attention: Mr. GeorgeForhan (519) 650-9833
Director of Realty & CorporateProperty Services Fax

(519) 650-7424

Grand Avenue and St. Andrews Street Site

Supplemental Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

Dear Mr. Forhan:

DillonConsulting Limited is pleased to provide you with the final

SupplementalPhase H Environmental Site Assessment Report for the Grand
Avenue and St. Andrews Street Site.

Should you have any questionsor comments, pleasecontact the undersignedat

(519) 650-9833 x236.

Yours sincerely,

DILLON CONSULTING LIMITED

Th
Projec
QI
'

anager
'

Dillon

Limited
 2
|i ,.

|l EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

E
Dillon Consulting Limited was retained by the City of Cambridge to conduct a
I? Supplemental Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Grand Avenue and
St. þÿAndrew s Street site. The objective of the ESA work was to collect additional data to
address MOE Site Specific Risk Assessment (SSRA) review comments and to support a

I Transition Risk Assessment to be preparedfor the site under O.Reg.l53/04. The MOE
related to tive main issues:
SSRA review comments

1 The degree of uncertainty surroundingthe transient groundwaterflow patterns

`

that have been observed and whether the existing monitoring well network is
sufficient to characterize the distribution of contaminants on and off-site.

2. The need for additional characterization of the quality of groundwaterbelow the

West Fill Area (TCE impactedsoil remediation area).

3. Further assessment and discussion regarding the potential for impact to the deeper
II Regional drinking water aquifer (e.g. Middleton Street Well Field).

4. The degreeof uncertainty associated with the potentialforenvironmental impact

to the Grand River that was assessed in the 2003 SSRA throughrisk modeling.
II
5. The degree of uncertainty associated with the assessment of risk for vapour
migration to the adjacentbuildings that were determined in the SSRA throughrisk
I! modeling.
The Supplemental ESA was conducted over a three year period to assess seasonal
changes in groundwaterquality, groundwaterflow, bedrock vapour quality and off-site
1 indoor air quality. The work included installation and samplingof 14 additional bedrock
water table monitoring wells (MW7-MW20), one deep monitoring well (MW 15D) and
five bedrockvapour monitors (VM1 to VM5) installed off-site to the north and east of the
former gasoline service station. LNAPL was identified in one monitoring well (MW9)
and a subsequentmonitoring program was conducted.

The following is a summary of the SupplementalPhase II ESA Results:

Qrogndwatg; Elgw
Ii » The results of hydrogeologicalassessment indicate that the shallow groundwater
elevation and flow direction are affected by both the controlled level of the Grand
River surface water and the pumping of groundwaterfrom the deeperRegional
'

Aquifer at the MSWF.

0 The expected groundwater flow direction below the Grand Avenue site is west to
3 east following topography. However, groundwater flow below the site and
I surroundingpropertiesis inferred to be east to west for the majority of the year,
and reverses direction for a brief period (less than one month approximately)in
the Spring.
|1
1
City of Cambridge Page i
SupplementalPhase II Environmental Site Assessment March 2008
ll
p
T

Grand Avenue and St. Andrews Strut Site Dillon ConsultingLimited

_ l
 The groundwater flow direction has been inferred to be east, west, northeast,
northwest, as well as a combination
of these directions, and can differ between the
east and west ends of the Grand Avenue site. The most common groundwater
flow direction that has been observed is northwest, from the Grand River, towards
the site and a hydraulically low
area in the water table near MW 17.
The water table at the west
end of the site has been observed to vary by more than
4.5 metres seasonally whereas the water table to the east remains more stable
(approximate 1 metre seasonal fluctuations) as result of influence from the
controlled level of the Grand River surface water.
The water table elevation is observed
to oscillate between 0.1 metres and 0.4
metres vertically throughout day. The the
oscillations correspond to the pumping
rates at the Middleton Street Well Field (MSWF) located approximately 800
metres south of the site. This indicates there is likely some connection between
the water table and lower
(Regional)aquifer.
The unusual
groundwater flow conditions are likely a result of the long term
pumping at MSWF which has depressedthe water table in this area It is probable
that vertical fracture pattems through the aquitard above the Regional
Aquifer
exist in this area, which enables disruption of the normal flow
pattems. The
Grand River, controlled through a series of dams, loses water to
groundwater and
further promotes the observed conditions. The Regional spring snow melt and
precipitation from topographicallyhigher areas to the west is high enough to
overcome the MSWF and Grand River iniluence for a short period in the
Spring.
Groundwater Quality PHCs and B'I'EX -

The concentrations of Fl and F2 range PHCs and BTEX are

consistentlyabove
the MOE Table 2 Standards on the fomier gasoline service station
portion of the
property. There has been no observed increasingor decreasingtrends in the
concentrations of BTEX or PHCs in groundwater below the site.
Off-site concentrations of PHCs and BTEX near the former gasoline station can
vary from being over Table 2 Standards to being not detected dependingon the
seasonal groundwater flow direction.
The lateral extent of PHCs and BTEX in groundwater above Table 2 Standards
off site is observed to changeseasonallywith the dissolved east plume oscillating
to west with
groundwaterflow.
Groundwater Quality TCE -

Four additional monitoring wells (MWl2-MWl5) were installed to assess the

potential for TCE to be present in groundwater at the west end of the Grand
Avenue site.
The concentration of TCE in groundwater
samplescollected from these wells was
below the MOE Table 2 Standards for potable
groundwater. The concentration of
TCE breakdown products, including
cis-l,2~dichloroethylene
and vinyl chloride,
were below the MOE Table 1 Background Standards.
The maximum concentration of TCE detected in the groundwater was in samples
collected from well MWl2
during two spring samplingevents in April 2005 (42.2
ug/L) and April 2006 (47.5
ug/L) under high water table conditions.
The concentration of TCE in groundwater was observed to increase as the water
table rises in the Spring and decreases (to levels below Table 1
Background

City of Cambrhlge Pageii

SupplementalPhase II Environmental
Site Assessment March 2008
Grand Avenue and St. Andrews Street Siu Dillon ConsultingLbnlted
 Standards) as the water table falls in Summer and Winter. This
suggests that there
is residual TCE within the bedrock matrix (fractures).
some
'

A high Water table elevation at the west end of the Grand Avenue site has been
shown to be a temporary seasonal effect and therefore the concentration of TCE
in the groundwaterfor the majority of the year is expectedto be below the Table l
BackgroundStandards.
Separate-phaseTCE in the form of a Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid
(DNAPL) has not been detected in the monitoring wells at the site. The maximum
concentration of TCE detected in groundwater is less than the MOE Table 2
potable groundwaterStandard, and 20,000 times less than the solubility of TCE.
The presence of DNAPL has not been observed and the formation of DNAPL is
not expected.

Potegggl for Imggg to the Rgglonal Qrinking Wggr Aquifer §MSWF|

Although hydrogeologicinvestigationsof this area of Cambridgehave identified

an aquitard separatingthe water table from the regional aquifer near the MSWF,
groundwater monitoring on and off-site has demonstrated that the water table
oscillates vertically based on the pumping rates at the MSWF. This
suggests that
there is a probable connection to the Regional aquifer in this area.
Investigations
conducted by others on the east side of the Grand River, opposite from the Grand
Avenue site, have demonstrated similar conditions to exist.

A deep groundwater well MWl5D was installed at the Grand Avenue site and
screened at an elevation corresponding to the upper production zone of the
MSWF.

Samplescollected from MWl5D met the MOE Table 2

potable groundwater
Standards for metals, VOCs and PHCs. The concentration of TCE in samples
collected on four separate occasions was below the MOE Table 1 Background
Standard.

Potenggl for Impact to tlggGrand Rivgr

The groundwater flow direction has been demonstrated to be west from the Grand
River towards the site (losing stream conditions) for the
majority of the year.
There isrelatively small window of time (estimated to be less than a one month
a

period) in the
Spring where groundwatermay dischargeto the river when easterly
groundwatertlow conditions are present.

City of Cambridge Page ii

SupplementalPhase I1 Environmental Site Assessment March 2008
Grand Avenue and St. Andrews Slreet Site Dillon ConsultingLimited