Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract. Background: Hyperplasia of mammary glands has been a sharp (eight fold) increase in the incidence from
(HMG) is a frequent disease, with increased cancer risk for 5 (1985-1995) to 40/100,000 (in 2005) (3-5).
women aged 20-55 years. The aim of this study was to Many women between 20-55 years of age with complaints
explore a non-invasive method to identify which patients with such as uni- or bilateral breast hypersensitivity or pain,
breast complaints need additional mammography for HMG worsening around or during menstruation, are understandably
diagnosis. Patients and Methods: Skin digital infrared concerned and may seek medical attention. In most cases,
thermal imaging (DITI) in 74 patients with HMG and 63 clinical examination does not show anything specific.
controls was carried out. Results: In the controls, the However, in a certain percentage of patients, physical
temperature of points close to the breasts and ovaries evaluation reveals that one or both breasts have single or
decreased with age. In women older than 39 years, HMG multiple small nodular changes, the borders of which are not
patients showed persistently high temperatures but in the well defined, have no cohesion with the surrounding tissue and
lower extremities there were no differences. With a threshold are therefore easily movable. If in addition, molybden target
for thoracic skin point KI21 of 33.2ºC, sensitivity and X-ray mammography shows no signs of cancer but high-
specificity in distinguishing controls from HMGs were 96% density mammographic parenchymal patterns, as measured by
and 52% (p=0.0001) respectively, as validated in a test set, the proportion of breast area composed of epithelial and
similar to recent DITI results for breast cancer detection. stromal tissue are detected (6), the combination of these
Conclusion: Infrared temperature imaging of specific skin clinical-palpatory and radiological findings is called
points is a rapid, non-invasive method to identify patients hyperplasia of the mammary glands (7) (see Table I).
requiring mammography to confirm HMG. As Figure 1 shows, HMG is not the same as mammary
dysplasia, a histopathological condition which develops through
Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy among a gradual process from normal breast tissue to hyperplasia,
women in the Western world and the incidence has sharply atypical hyperplasia, to carcinoma in situ (CIS), and invasive
increased over the past four decades (1, 2). In contrast, the carcinoma (8). Mammary dysplasia is a precancerous lesion and
incidence in China, more specifically Shanghai, has in some dysplasias, invasive cancer can be found in the follow-
traditionally been very low (5/100,000), but since 1995 there up. The risk of breast cancer in HMG is however, much lower,
although is still higher when compared to healthy women (7).
This means that performing mammography (which can be an
unpleasant procedure) is overtreatment in those women with
Correspondence to: Professor X. Shen, Acupuncture and Tuina HMG who may not actually develop breast cancer. Therefore, it
College, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,
could be of great benefit to develop a method to identify those
1200 Cailun Road, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China. Tel: +86
2151322175, Fax: +86 2151322174, e-mail: snowysh@hotmail.com patients with breast complaints which are not HMG, as such
women do not require mammography. Such a method should
Key Words: Breast, hyperplasia, dysplasia, infrared temperature, be rapid, easily applicable, inexpensive, sensitive and if
skin. possible, non-invasive and harmless.
Table I. The diagnosis of hyperplasia of the mammary glands (HMG) is based on a combination of clinical and radiological criteria. HMG is not
the same as mammary dysplasia, which is a histopathological diagnosis.
# Type Criterion
1 Main clinical complaints Uni- or bilateral breast hypersensitivity or pain, often worse around or during menstruation.
2 Clinical-physical examination a) One or both breasts have nodular changes.
b) The borders of these nodules are not well defined.
c) The nodules have no cohesion with the surrounding tissue.
d) Therefore, the nodules are easily movable.
3 Age distribution The disease is most common between age 20 and 55.
4 Molybden target X-ray mammography a) No signs for cancer, but,
b) there are high-density mammographic parenchymal patterns, as measured
by the proportion of breast area composed of epithelial and stromal tissue*.
5 Exclusion criteria Exclude patients
a) before menarche,
b) currently using hormone treatment,
c) stopped hormone treatment less than 6 months previously, and
d) males.
Digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI) was introduced the Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
into medicine in the late 1950s. Early studies suggested that Participation was strictly voluntary (the study resources did not
the method could be useful for breast cancer detection, allow us to provide a volunteer for all 74 patients). Each of the 63
volunteers was given a thorough physical examination by a medical
amongst others. But the early instrumentation was not
specialist in breast disease and additional standard breast
sensitive enough to detect the subtle changes in temperature examinations were performed as indicated by the 2002 criteria (7).
needed for accurate detection and monitoring of breast None of the volunteers had any signs of breast, endocrine of
disease. However, in recent years the sensitivity and hormonal abnormalities, neither at examination nor in her history.
resolution of infrared instruments has greatly improved. One The diagnosis in all cases was confirmed by B-mode ultrasonic
recent study on breast biopsies which were recommended examination or molybdenum target X-ray.
based on prior mammogram or ultrasound indicated that
Determination method. The ThermaCAM™ P30 infrared thermal
DITI is a valuable adjunct to mammography and ultrasound, imaging system manufactured by the FLIR System Company in
especially in women with dense breast parenchyma (9). Sweden was selected to determine room temperature of 22(±2)˚C,
In agreement with these findings, we recently found that and relative humidity of 40(±10)%, in a dark room with two 36-watt
the infrared radiation temperature of certain skin points is fluorescent lamps. There was no obvious air flow, no loud noises
significantly different in patients with HMG when compared and no electromagnetism in the room. Before determination, the
with healthy women of the same age group (20-55 years). In participants were requested to enter the laboratory, untie their bra,
and sit for 30 min to adapt to the surroundings. After that they were
order to increase the sensitivity of DITI for identifying
asked to sit up erectly, and expose the body parts to be assessed.
HMG, it remains to be assessed whether these findings are The examiner adjusted the lens to capture the selected locations
age dependent (10). If so, DITI could be used in specific age from a fixed position 1 m away. Figure 2 shows the examples of the
groups as a simple outpatient clinic system, identifying those measurement results. In the control group, there was no difference
patients with clinical HMG signs who do and those do not between the control points on the left and right trunk (p=0.56) nor
require additional mammography. We have therefore the left and right feet (p=0.20). As there was no correlation between
analyzed 74 patients with clinically radiologically confirmed the points on the trunk and the feet, points on the trunk and feet
were always used for control purposes.
HMGand 63 healthy control women of the same age. The
2008 World Health Organization (WHO) system was used to WHO 2008 skin points. The infrared radiation temperature image
select the different skin points for measurement (11). on 10 skin points was recorded. The location of points is based on
the location of points stipulated by the 2008 Standard Skin Points
Patients and Methods according to the World Health Organization (11). Figure 3 shows
where these points are located on the body surface.
Diagnostic criteria, patients and healthy controls. The 2002
diagnostic criteria for HMG (7) were used. Seventy-four patients Statistical methods. The statistical management was performed
with HMG were diagnosed at the Longhua Hospital, Shanghai, with the SPSS15 software package (SPSS inc, Chigago, Il, USA).
China. During the same period, healthy women in the same age Normality of the distributions was tested and no differences were
groups as the patient group were selected from the employee file of found. The infrared radiation temperature comparison on body
4698
Li et al: DITI in Breast Hyperplasia
4699
ANTICANCER RESEARCH 29: 4697-4702 (2009)
Figure 4. Scatter plot of age versus the temperature of skin point KI21
(Youmen) on the right side of the body. Correlation analysis showed a
decrease with age in the controls (R=–0.42, p=0.0007). However, in Figure 5. Box-plot analysis of separate age groups for the temperature of
patients with hyperplasia of the mammary glands (HMG) the temperature point right KI21 (Youmen) of the controls (blue bars) and patients with
persists at a high level with increasing age (R=–0.04, p=0.74). hyperplasia of the mammary glands (HMG) (green bars). Note the
difference in skin temperature between HMG cases and controls in
different age groups, which is significant in women over 39 years of age.
surface of points was made by Student’s t- and Mann-Whitney groups (Table II). Whereas in the controls the temperature
tests (whenever applicable). Correlation analysis used the Pearson of nearly all points decreased with age, in HMG patients
and Spearman tests. We found practically the same results in the
the temperature of several points persisted at a high level.
parametric and non-parametric test, and present the latter. Scatter
plots and box plots were used for graphical analysis of the data. The persistent high temperature of trunk points mainly
Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to discretize concerned HMG patients over the age of 39 years
the continuous variables for stepwise multivariate regression (p<0.0001, Figures 4 and 5) and was especially evident in
analysis, using the diagnostic groups (healthy controls, HMG points close to the breasts (WHO skin points KI21 and
patients) as the classification variable. Random numbers were used LR14), and in the midline of the lower abdomen (point
to create a set for learning and testing the results. Moreover, the CV4). On the lower extremities, the skin temperatures
results were cross validated, in which each case was classified by
were different from the findings on the trunk as the
the functions derived from all cases other than that case (leaving
one out method). Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative temperature was found to decrease with age both in the
predictive values and overall predictive values were calculated. healthy controls and HMG, and was therefore basically the
Multivariate binary logistic analysis was performed to find the same in the two groups studied.
most optimal combined set of points discriminating HMG patients As the results are clearly most significant for those over
and healthy controls. the age of 39, these patients were further investigated. In
order to obtain more reliable results, the analyses were
Results carried out of the learning set and validated in the tests set.
The temperature at points KI21, LR14 and CV4 gave the
The age ranged from 20-55 years (mean and standard most significant discriminating features. However, KI21 and
deviation: 36.3±8.8 years) for the 74 HMG patients and from LR14 were strongly correlated and binary logistic regression
20-50 years (mean and S.D.: 34.5±8.9) for the 63 healthy analysis showed that KI21 and CV4 (p=0.0001 and 0.04
controls. The difference in age was not significant (p=0.63). respectively) provide the optimal set of features
In the total group of 74+63=137 women, the discriminating between the HMG patients and healthy
temperature of many points on the trunk decreased with controls. With a threshold of 33.2 ºC for KI21, the optimal
age. However, separate analysis in healthy and HMG sensitivity (96%), specificity (52%), positive predictive value
women showed that there is a difference between the two (PPV) 68% and negative predictive value (NPV) 93% were
4700
Li et al: DITI in Breast Hyperplasia
Table II. Comparison of the correlations between the temperature of Table III. Cross validation of the classification, in which each case is
skin points and age in healthy controls and patients with hyperplasia of classified by the functions derived from all cases other than that case. A
the mammary glands (HMG). Trunk temperature decreases with age in total of 40/52 (77%) of the original grouped cases were correctly
the healthy controls, whereas in HMG there is persistent high classified, while 39/52 (75%) of cross-validated grouped cases were
temperature at these points. correctly classified.
Skin point Statistic Healthy Patients Difference Diagnostic Predicted group Total
(WHO 2008) controls with between group membership
HMG controls
and HMG Controls HMG
patients
Original Controls 18 (72%) 7 (28%) 25 (100%)
Trunk HMG 5 (19%) 22 (81%) 27 (100%)
CV17 Correlation coefficient –0.35 0.06 Yes Cross-validated Controls 17 (68%) 8 (32%) 25 (100%)
P 0.004 0.64 HMG 5 (19%) 22 (81%) 27 (100%)
ST18 Left Correlation coefficient –0.13 0.13 No
P 0.31 0.26 Results of cross validation
ST18 Right Correlation coefficient –0.22 0.01 No
P 0.09 0.96 Sensitivity 81%
LR14 Left Correlation coefficient –0.29 0.13 Yes Specificity 68%
P 0.02 0.29 Positive predictive value 73%
Negative predictive value 77%
LR14 Right Correlation coefficient –0.37 0.08 Yes
Overall correctly classified 75%
P 0.003 0.51
KI21 Left Correlation coefficient –0.33 –0.03 Yes
P 0.009 0.80
KI21 Right Correlation coefficient –0.42 –0.04 Yes Table IV. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of dermal infrared
P 0.0007 0.74 skin temperature measurements by digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI),
CV6 Correlation coefficient –0.38 –0.13 Yes for patients of 40-55 years of age with breast cancer and hyperplasia of
P 0.002 0.29 the mammary glands (HMG).
CV4 Correlation coefficient –0.43 –0.21 Yes
P 0.0004 0.08 Breast cancer* HMG
4701
ANTICANCER RESEARCH 29: 4697-4702 (2009)
4702