20210203-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Why To Arrest & Imprison PM Scott Morrison and Co

20210203-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
ISSUE –
Why to arrest & imprison PM Scott Morrison and Co
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.
* Gerrit, you really are so to say entering the lion’s den, are you?
**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, it is sickening how we got parliamentarians and others who

are all jumping on the band wagon of this One World Order and are willing to betray the very
people they are to represent and/or are required to provide appropriate care for.
To avoid repeating what I published on 31-01-2021 I refer to:
The time has come to hold the lairs of politicians, medical doctors, scientist and others
legally accountable for their “disinformation” and “FRAUD” about the safety of
vaccinations. Life long imprisonment may be the most appropriate reward for them.
This document can be downloaded from:

https://www.scribd.com/document/492753197/20210131-PRESS-RELEASE-Mr-G-H-
Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-Election-Interferences-COVID-Vaccination-Issues
.
Let us not ignore CDC person Dr Anthony Fauci;
https://www.westernjournal.com/can-trust-fauci-flip-flops-yet-another-covid-masking-
issue/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=WJBreaking&ff_campaign=ct-breaking&ff_content=western-journal
How Can We Trust Him? Fauci Flip-Flops on Yet Another COVID Masking Issue
QUOTE
Masks don’t work. Masks work.
COVID-19 doesn’t spread from asymptomatic carriers. COVID-19 does spread from asymptomatic
carriers.
All schools need to be closed to prevent COVID transmission. Schools don’t have a significant impact
on COVID transmission.
END QUOTE
https://www.westernjournal.com/can-trust-fauci-flip-flops-yet-another-covid-masking-
issue/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=WJBreaking&ff_campaign=ct-breaking&ff_content=western-journal
How Can We Trust Him? Fauci Flip-Flops on Yet Another COVID Masking Issue
QUOTE
Breitbart reported that on Jan. 25, Fauci recommended that Americans wear multiple masks at once,
“claiming that it only made ‘common sense’ to have another layer of protection.”
p1 3-2-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Typically, Fauci takes a few weeks or months before he revises a recommendation. This time, it only
took until Thursday, when he revised his recommendation by claiming that there is “no data that
indicates that [double-masking] is going to make a difference,” according to Breitbart.
END QUOTE
And, then consider that reportedly Dr Fauci is a financial stakeholder in Moderna:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/many-scientists-citing-two-scandalous-covid-19-papers-ignore-their-
retractions
Many scientists citing two scandalous COVID-19 papers ignore their retractions
QUOTE
In June 2020, in the biggest research scandal of the pandemic so far, two of the most important medical
journals each retracted a high-profile study of COVID-19 patients. Thousands of news articles, tweets, and
scholarly commentaries highlighted the scandal, yet many researchers apparently failed to notice. In
an examination of the most recent 200 academic articles published in 2020 that cite those papers,
Science found that more than half—including many in leading journals—used the disgraced papers to
support scientific findings and failed to note the retractions.
END QUOTE
retractions
QUOTE
Questions soon arose about the validity, and even existence, of the Surgisphere database, however, and
the retractions followed on 4 June. But of the 200 papers examined by Science—all published after the
retractions—105 inappropriately cited one of the disgraced studies. In several cases it was a primary
source for a meta-analysis combining multiple studies to draw overarching conclusions.
END QUOTE
And
retractions
QUOTE
The 22 May 2020 Lancet paper ostensibly showed that hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug promoted
by President Donald Trump and others, could harm rather than help COVID-19 patients. Its publication led to
a temporary halt in a major clinical trial and inflamed an already-divisive debate over the drug, which has
proved to be no help against COVID-19
END QUOTE
Just that since Joe Biden “allegedly” became President suddenly now “hydroxychloroquine, an
antimalarial drug” suddenly are after all proven to be better, with lower death rates, etc.
That alone should be of concern that you have a lot of politicians, doctors and scientist all
making claims about “prove” when they rely upon falsified details.
This to me underlines that you cannot trust the FDA and CDC of the USA because I view they
are compromised by peddling falsehood.
.
As I made clear in the article of 31-1-2021 that this “safety” of vaccination and re Autism was all
fabricated because as Robert F Kennedy and Del BigTree proved in court that for some 2 years
there never was any safety checking at all. Yet Australian politicians, doctors and scientist all
seemed to go along with this nonsense of “safety” of vaccinations when clearly there was no
evidence other they were all on the same bandwagon.
Never mind those who suffered horrendously as result of “unsafe” vaccinations, as after all most
of them may have directly or indirectly financially benefitted for promoting this gigantic lie.

I understand that Member of Parliament Tanya Plibersek’s husband is a convicted drug smuggler
and it seems to me that her husband was the least concerned about the harm he did and/or was
inflicted upon the many. And, she appears to be now lecturing other Members of Parliament
about what is appropriate?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AuvhMTMoby41/
The Moderna & Pfizer Covid jabs are legally NOT Vaccines!!!
QUOTE
Dr. David Martin methodically and accurately takes apart the phony story that Moderna and Pfizer
are delivering vaccines. He reveals that Moderna admits that their patents say “gene therapy” not
“vaccine.” They put a synthetic RNA fragment embedded …
MORE
Dr. David Martin methodically and accurately takes apart the phony story that Moderna and Pfizer
are delivering vaccines. He reveals that Moderna admits that their patents say “gene therapy” not
“vaccine.” They put a synthetic RNA fragment embedded into a fat carrier, whose only purpose is to
lessen the symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus. The legal ramifications
of this deception are immense.
END QUOTE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AuvhMTMoby41/
The Moderna & Pfizer Covid jabs are legally NOT Vaccines!!!
QUOTE
COVID-19.
Moderna & Pfizer are not vaccines, but are actually "Experimental Gene Therapy Technology".
The 1986 Liability Exclusion under touted Emergency Powers allows these so called vaccine companies
to make billions in profit with no liability.
If this was not a vaccine then this liability shield would vanish because there is no clause under the
1986 act allowing medical counter-measure that is gene therapy.
Which means that there are most probably "Governors and Health & Human Services & CDC &
others" maintaining the illusion of a "State of Emergency" not because there is a "State of
Emergency", they're maintaining it because it maintains the illusion of the liability shield.
Blockbuster Revelations!! It's true! All of our different levels of Federal & State governments have
kept us in perpetual "States of Emergency" which is obviously a sham and a ruse for their criminal
behavior to continue unimpeded.
END QUOTE
This to me means that any politician, medical doctor, scientist and others who are associated with
PM Scott Morrison to pursue this elaborate criminal conduct to pretend something to be a
“vaccine” when in fact it is an “Experimental Gene Therapy Technology” should be attested
and imprisoned for the harm they are inflicting upon the general community and any of them.
When one considers what really is inside of the so called “vaccines” one could rightfully be
horrified.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/schedules/sets-schedule.html
Who Sets the Immunization Schedule?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7fosOoqoGukI/
What's in the COVID-19 Vaccine?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccination
Vaccination
QUOTE
Vaccines contain a microorganism or virus in a weakened, live or killed state, or
proteins or toxins from the organism.
END QUOTE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_senescence
Cellular senescence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
QUOTE
(Upper) Primary mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (MEFs) before senescence. Spindle-shaped.
(Lower) MEFs became senescent after passages. Cells grow larger, flatten shape and expressed senescence-
associated β-galactosidase (SABG, blue areas), a marker of cellular senescence.
Cellular senescence is a phenomenon characterized by the cessation of cell division. In their groundbreaking
experiments during the early 1960s, Leonard Hayflick and Paul Moorhead found that normal human fetal
fibroblasts in culture reach a maximum of approximately 50 cell population doublings before becoming
senescent.[1][2][3] This process is known as "replicative senescence", or the Hayflick limit. Hayflick's discovery
of mortal cells paved the path for the discovery and understanding of cellular aging molecular pathways. [4]
Cellular senescence can be initiated by a wide variety of stress inducing factors. These stress factors include
both environmental and internal damaging events, abnormal cellular growth, oxidative stress, autophagy
factors, among many other things.[5]
The physiological importance for cell senescence has been attributed to prevention of carcinogenesis, and
more recently, aging, development, and tissue repair.[6] Senescent cells contribute to the aging phenotype,
including frailty syndrome, sarcopenia, and aging-associated diseases.[7] Senescent astrocytes and microglia
contribute to neurodegeneration.[8]
END QUOTE
The non-existent virus: it undercuts all other stories « Jon Rappoport's Blog
(nomorefakenews.com)
The non-existent virus: it undercuts

all other stories
QUOTE
There is a legal technicality concerning Moderna and Pfizer’s “vaccines”. They are not “vaccines”, they are
“gene therapies”. The fake vaccines do not contain any virus material to qualify as a “vaccine”.
The DOD, the responsible party for Operation Warp Speed, made several requests for confirmation of non-
liability for damages and death due to these non-vaccines. However, the law that protects them from
liability does not cover “gene therapy”. This is HUGE!
David E. Martin…
https://youtu.be/p_hwJkhNo9w
END QUOTE
https://mobile.twitter.com/cynthiamckinney/status/1355919082512650241?s=20
https://t.co/ymE3PIPoVm?amp=1 Cynthiamckinney video

Cynthia McKinney PhD on Twitter: "OK, so now what exactly is the function of these nanoparticles contained in the
experimental Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine?? https://t.co/ymE3PIPoVm" / Twitter
QUOTE
Ray Armat, Ph.D.
@RayArmat
· Jan 30
A prominent surgeon @noorchashm is harassed online for his factual warning about risk of embolism
in unscreened #CovidVaccine recipients: In fact, Among 1563 deaths or Serious Adverse Events by 1/22
in vaccine recipients, many reported forms of embolism: https://bit.ly/3pymTem
END QUOTE
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Structural_Biochemistry/DNA_recombinant_techniques/Gene_Therapy
Structural Biochemistry/DNA recombinant techniques/Gene Therapy
QUOTE
Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent
diseases. Genes are specific sequences of bases that encode instructions
END QUOTE
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Structural_Biochemistry/DNA_recombinant_techniques/Gene_The
rapy
Structural Biochemistry/DNA recombinant techniques/Gene Therapy
QUOTE
What is gene therapy?[edit]
Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent diseases. Genes are specific
sequences of bases that encode instructions on how to make proteins. When genes are altered so that the
encoded proteins are unable to carry out their normal functions, genetic disorders can result. Gene therapy is
used for correcting defective genes responsible for disease development. Researchers may use one of
several approaches for correcting faulty genes. Although gene therapy is a promising treatment which helps
successfully treat and prevent various diseases including inherited disorders, some types of cancer, and
certain viral infections, it is still at experimental stage. Gene therapy is currently only being tested for the
treatment of diseases that have no other cures.
END QUOTE
Again “an experimental technique”, “Gene therapy is used for correcting defective genes ”, “Gene therapy is
currently only being tested for the treatment of diseases that have no other cures. ”
No one I am aware of during my research throughout 2020 or for that in 2021 in any manner has
claimed that there was a “defective genes ” issue to provide the need for a “correcting defective genes ”
requirement.
https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/771002/fda-approves-clinical-trial-for-clover-
covid-19-vaccine/story/
News Results for ChAdOx1-S
FDA approves clinical trial for Clover COVID-19 vaccine Pfizer vaccine gets FDA nod
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChAdOx1
ChAdOx1 - Wikipedia
QUOTE
ChAdOx1 is a adenoviral vaccine vector developed by the Jenner Institute, University of
Oxford. The vector is a chimpanzee adenovirus modified to avoid its ...
END QUOTE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChAdOx1
ChAdOx1 - Wikipedia
QUOTE
Virology[edit]
ChAdOx1 has been derived from a simian adenovirus (ChAd) serotype Y25 engineered by λ red
recombination to exchange the native E4 orf4, orf6 and orf6/7 genes for those from human adenovirus
HAdV-C5.[2][3]
END QUOTE
When one on an experimental basis desires to force people to have changes of DNA regardless
that the outcome may never be what could be reasonably expected, as after all it are experiments,
perhaps I may wonder of Tanya Plibersek hopes her husband may gain more customers for drug
dealings as an end result? After all, in my view no sane person would go along to have some
“experiment” done of so many humans when it is not at all to address some “defect” of a gene
but rather to impose some possible outcome that may never really eventuate as such but can
cause considerable harm to the many.
As I recall, during 2020 “snake oil” seller PM Scott Morrison was making clear that he would
pursue what he previously introduced the “No Jap, No Pay” system to force people to have the
vaccination. And, Qantas and others (such as employers) have even pursued some requirement
that one must have a COVID-19 vaccination certificate. Well, up yours. Abusing one’s position
to force someone to accept unethical conditions I view must be rewarded with life imprisonment
for all those involved.
As I, in 2009, when representing Mr Francis James Colosimo submitted to Her Honour Harbison
J that “No one in the world could comply with the terms of the orders” this as they related to a
secondary residence that didn’t exist as such.
The same is with this “vaccination” issue where a “gene therapy” is not a vaccination and as such
It is an elaborate swindle to force people to be subjected to some new World Order program well
beyond the powers of anyone. In fact in direct violation of the embedded legal provisions of the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
QUOTE
Part V—Powers of the Parliament
51 Legislative powers of the Parliament [see Notes 10 and 11]
The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to
make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the
Commonwealth with respect to:
END QUOTE
Hansard 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
Mr. OCONNOR (New South Wales).-The honorable and learned member (Mr. Isaacs) is I think correct
in the history of this clause that he has given, and this is [start page 672] one of those instances which should
make us very careful of following too slavishly the provisions of the United States Constitution, or any other
Constitution. No doubt in putting together the draft of this Bill, those who were responsible for doing so used
the material they found in every Constitution before it, and probably they felt that they would be incurring a
great deal of responsibility in leaving out provisions which might be in the least degree applicable. But it is
for us to consider, looking at the history and reasons for these provisions in the Constitution of the United
States, whether they are in any way applicable; and I quite agree with my honorable and learned frien d (Mr.
Carruthers) that we should be very careful of every word that we put in this Constitution, and that we should
have no word in it which we do not see some reason for. Because there can be no question that in time to
come, when this Constitution has to be interpreted, every word will be weighed and an interpretation given to
it; and by the use now of what I may describe as idle words which we have no use for, we may be giving a
direction to the Constitution which none of us now contemplate. Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to see that
there is some reason for every clause and every word that goes into this Constitution.
END QUOTE
.
QUOTE Mr. BARTON.
If we are going to give the Federal Parliament power to legislate as it pleases with regard to Commonwealth
citizenship, not having defined it, we may be enabling the Parliament to pass legislation that would really
defeat all the principles inserted elsewhere in the Constitution, and, in fact, to play ducks and drakes with it.
That is not what is meant by the term "Trust the Federal Parliament."
END QUOTE

QUOTE Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-
When we consider how vast the importance is that every word of the Constitution should be correct,
that every clause should fit into every other clause; when we consider the great amount of time, trouble,
and expense it would take to make any alteration, and that, if we have not made our intentions clear,
we shall undoubtedly have laid the foundation of lawsuits of a most extensive nature, which will harass
the people of United Australia and create dissatisfaction with our work, it must be evident that too
much care has not been exercised.
END QUOTE
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.-this Constitution is to be worked under a system of responsible government
END QUOTE
And
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.- We have simply said that the guarantee of the liberalism of this Constitution is
responsible government, and that we decline to impair or to infect in any way that guarantee.
END QUOTE
And
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by the
Parliament of the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in effect, because the
provisions of this Constitution, the principles which it embodies, and the details of enactment by which
those principles are enforced, will all have been the work of Australians.
END QUOTE
And
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.- Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have provided for an
Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and,
therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people.
END QUOTE
.
QUOTE
Mr. DEAKIN.- In this Constitution, although much is written much remains unwritten,
END QUOTE
Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
Is it a Constitution which gives all reasonable and liberal guarantees of freedom? That can only be
answered in one way. Is it a Constitution the action of which, until amended by the people, is preserved and
safeguarded? There is only one answer to that. Is it a Constitution which the people themselves, by their
will expressed by their Parliament and themselves, are able to alter to suit their needs under conditions of
reasonable thought, without unreasonable difficulty? There can be no answer but one to. that question.
END QUOTE
Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that people
through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to day the existence
of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance into, the commission of any
act which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it must in its very essence be a free
Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary that is secured in the very way in which the
freedom of the British Constitution is secured. It is secured by vesting in the people, through their
representatives, the power of the purse, and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way of
securing absolute freedom to a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than
that which we contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to protect
the citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of interference.
Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily government of the country, but in the

daily determination of the question of whom is the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of
freedom in this Constitution. There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but
every one has sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the
popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain, and I think I have
made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have
provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the provisions of that
Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people. We have provided for a
Judiciary, which will determine questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other
questions which should be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of
Appeal for all courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not provided,
first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the will of the people, which is
the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be
twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court appointed by their own Executive, but acting
independently, is to decide what is a perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in the
constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be
above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose of
saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and the Parliament of
the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the Constitution, they are bound to serve.
What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or
any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that
Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom
which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you are
creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as will
preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of constitutional
action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the
Commonwealth. Having provided for all these things, I think this Convention has done well.
END QUOTE

QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.- We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of
the Constitution. . It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under
it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-
the Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of
this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions , then by slow
degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the
guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the
court you are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as
will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of
constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere
of the Commonwealth.
END QUOTE
HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
END QUOTE
The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE

QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a s entry.
As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
END QUOTE
And let us not overlook:

QUOTE
Sir JOHN DOWNER.-Now it is coming out. The Constitution is made for the people and the states on
terms that are just to both.
Mr. DEAKIN.-It is made for the lawyers under this clause.
Sir JOHN DOWNER.-I do not think so. If you say "Trust the Parliament," no Constitution is required
at all; it can simply be provided that a certain number of gentlemen shall be elected, and meet together, and,
without limitation, do what they like. Victoria would not agree to that. But there is a desire to draw the very
life-blood of the Constitution, so far as the states are concerned, by this insidious amendment, which would
give the Houses authority from time to time to put different constructions on this most important part
of the Constitution. I hope we will do as we have done in many instances before, in matters that have been
much debated-adhere to the decision we have already arrived at.
END QUOTE
HANSARD 12-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
QUOTE Mr. BARTON:
It is provided that instead of, as before, the Parliament having power to constitute a judiciary, there
shall be a Supreme Court, to be called the High Court of Australia, as a part of the Constitution-that I
believe to be an improvement-and other courts which the Parliament may from time to time create or
invest with federal jurisdiction.
END QUOTE

QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.
As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
END QUOTE
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/scott-morrison-must-heed-the-lesson-of-donald-
trump-and-slap-down-craig-kelly/ar-BB1diW5c?ocid=spartan-dhp-feeds
Scott Morrison must heed the lesson of Donald Trump and slap down Craig Kelly
QUOTE
Kelly, who specialised in implacable unreason about climate change before his conversion to stubborn
contrarianism about various Covid remedies – contrarianism at odds with the views of designated experts
including Australia’s chief medical officer – speaks to a constituency the Coalition wants to court: a group of
voters tempted to vote for rightwing protest parties rather than the Liberals and the Nationals.
END QUOTE
QUOTE
If representation and recruitment is an objective, self-styled mavericks like Kelly and his Queensland
sidekick George Christensen have some utility. This duo operates like an extended wink and a nudge; they
tell voters the Coalition is a broad enough church to be a home for fringe views.
Kelly and Christensen, and their relentless courtship of people who like to position themselves against
mainstream orthodoxy, allow that welcoming signal to be sent without senior players in government being
caught on the sticky paper (apart from Michael McCormack, who blunders in periodically trying to court the
politically estranged with all the finesse of an exploding cigar).
END QUOTE
First of all, if all politicians were to agree with each other then we wouldn’t need to have all
those politicians but merely just have one who decides matters. It is because of the differences
between constituents of one area versus that of another that one elect a representative.
As such I view that “self-styled mavericks like Kelly and his Queensland sidekick George Christensen ” are
precisely doing what their constitutional obligations are as a “sentries”.
The same is why we have different government for different countries, as what may suit one
country may not at all suit another. Those peddling One World Government would therefore
accept pedophilia, jihad, etc. After all One World Government must cater for all. Or is it just that
the nonsense of One World Government is nothing more than to pursue world slavery and got
absolutely nothing to do with “peace” because people live in certain areas of the world and will
not accept whatsoever what may suit people in other parts of the world.
But let’s look at the credibility of the news media.

.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/story-on-abc-program-claims-donald-trump-nearly-
ended-democracy/ar-BB1djrJB?ocid=spartan-dhp-feeds
Story on ABC program claims Donald Trump ‘nearly ended democracy’
QUOTE
An “extraordinary” story from the ABC’s Sarah Ferguson on the Four Corners program claims Former US
President Donald Trump “very nearly ended democracy”, according to Sky News host Andrew Bolt.
“Sarah Ferguson went on to say Donald Trump nearly ended democracy, destroyed democracy in America,”
Mr Bolt said.
He spoke with the Sydney Institute’s Gerard Henderson about the matter.
“Sarah Ferguson ends up suggesting that the United States is on the verge of civil war,” Mr Henderson said.
“I don’t know whether she knows much about civil wars, if you look at the American Civil War or the
Spanish Civil War of the 1930’s, these were absolutely devastating events on society.
“What you had on the sixth of January was certainly a riot, and there was some degree of violence around
that riot.
“The concept that you’ve got to send someone from Australia over to the United States to come back with a
program report that there’s civil war around the corner, I just think that’s hyperbolic.”
END QUOTE
Versus
Lindsey Graham threatens to bring in FBI testimony if Democrats call witnesses in Trump
impeachment trial (msn.com)
Lindsey Graham threatens to bring in FBI testimony if Democrats call witnesses in
Trump impeachment trial
QUOTE
Lindsey Graham has threatened to call in the FBI to testify about security failures
during the Capitol riots last month if Democrats try to call even
one witness at Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.
The South Carolina senator has repeatedly argued against calling witnesses to
speak on the charge of incitement to insurrection faced by the former president,

who is accused of encouraging his supporters to attack the US Capitol on 6
January in violent scenes that left five dead.
END QUOTE
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/right-wing-terrorism-is-just-that/ar-
BB1diGA9?ocid=spartan-ntp-feeds
Right-wing terrorism is just that
QUOTE
The threat of right-wing terrorism in the US — already apparent to front-line officials — is increasingly
being recognised at high levels of the US government in the wake of Trump’s removal. Paging Peter Dutton:
the effort to coordinate the fight against right-wing terrorism internationally was stymied because the Trump
administration refused to call right-wing terrorism right-wing terrorism. Plus ASPI’s Fergus Ryan on why
Russia and China — two regimes who normally love censorship — are happy to help keep the far-right
online.
Meanwhile Republicans are abandoning their party in the wake of January 6 (it only took a coup attempt, not
four years of Trump).
END QUOTE
How on earth can it be accepted that the media can continue to falsify the TRUTH is beyond me.
This very bias nonsense of article may also be exposed by the following quotations:
FBI Reveals Pipe Bombs at RNC and DNC Headquarters Were Not Planted on Day of Capitol
Incursion (westernjournal.com)
FBI Reveals Pipe Bombs at RNC and DNC Headquarters Were Not Planted on Day of
Capitol Incursion
QUOTE
The events have of course also been used to connect the incursion to former
President Donald Trump and his supporters.
But the FBI said Friday that the bombs were placed the night before the incursion,
which was more than 12 hours before Trump addressed a crowd and asked them to
peacefully protest.
END QUOTE
https://www.westernjournal.com/commentary/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=conservative-
brief-WJ&ff_campaign=dailypm&ff_content=western-journal
Let's Examine the Claim That Trump Incited

'Insurrection' at the Capitol
QUOTE
First, we know, establishment media outlets like The Washington Post and CNN have reported that the
Capitol incursion was pre-planned, meaning it couldn’t have been incited by Trump’s speech.
What did Trump actually say in his speech to hundreds of thousands of supporters gathered in Washington,
D.C., on that day?
“I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically
make your voices heard,” Trump said, according to an Associated Press transcript.
“We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen
and women, and we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them,” he further stated.
RELATED: Democrats Now Pushing to Commute the Sentences of Every Death Row Inmate
“Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be
strong. We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been
lawfully slated, lawfully slated.”

END QUOTE
DOJ Announcement Provides Huge Evidence Trump Didn't Incite Insurrection

(westernjournal.com)
DOJ Announcement Provides Huge Evidence Trump Didn't Incite Insurrection
QUOTE
On Wednesday, the Department of Justice announced three individuals affiliated with the Oath Keepers had
been indicted for their alleged roles in planning the riot at the Capitol. Jessica Marie Watkins, 38, and
Donovan Ray Crowl, 50, are both from Champaign County, Ohio. Thomas Caldwell, 65, is from Clarke
County, Virginia.
“According to the charging documents, Watkins, Crowl, and Caldwell communicated with each another in
advance of the Jan. 6, 2021, incursion on the U.S. Capitol and coordinated their attack. Watkins, Crowl, and
Caldwell are all affiliated with the Oath Keepers, while Watkins and Crowl are also members of the Ohio
State Regular Militia,” a news release from the Department of Justice reads.
“Watkins claimed to be a commanding officer within the Ohio State Regular Militia in a social media post.”
Their social media posts on sites like Facebook and Parler on the day of the incursion indicated they were in
the area, and indeed participating, in the riot, the DOJ said. Watkins allegedly posted a video of herself inside
the Capitol with the caption, “Yeah. We stormed the Capitol today. Teargassed, the whole, 9. Pushed our way
into the Rotunda. Made it into the Senate even. The news is lying (even Fox) about the Historical Events we
created today.” My guess is that won’t be the line she uses in court.
What’s interesting about the news release, however, is the fact that authorities said the Oath Keepers
members were in contact early, coordinating their actions as far back as November. They were also
allegedly in close communication as the incursion happened.
END QUOTE
It should be very clear that the attack was planned as long ago as November 2020.
There is however where we have eyewitness account of a “war correspondent”.
“‘Agent Provocateur’ Tactics Seen at Jan 6 US Capitol Protest-interview Michael”

Presented by Joshua of Crossroads of The Epoch times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bleKj7fZ8U&feature=youtu.be
What Michael describe from his extensive covering of wars, etc, is that those who were leading
the charge were Antifa, and they coerced others to follow. He reports that many Trump
supporters opposed this and even tried to stop any unlawful conduct.
Without that I ever have set foot in the USA, unlike “Sarah Ferguson” nevertheless I am able to
gather information that underlines that the attack on the Capitol was planned well in advance, as
I indicated previously also in my 31-01-2021 Article.
As I indicated in previous writings also, that Nancy Pelosi has been supporting the taking over of
a Capitol of a State and this then was for about one month. Also, that (then) Senator Kamala
Harris was endorsing and encouraging the murderous riots and even AFTER the election and was
funding the release of those who participated in those riots. And, not to ignore Joe Biden also
funding the rioters.
It is therefore clear indeed very clear that the ABC using taxpayer’s monies is so to say selling
“snake oil”. It is not impartially reporting FACTS but merely slanting it.
COMPACT-TV: Gericht in Peru: Gates, Soros & Co. für Corona verantwortlich › Jouwatch
(journalistenwatch.com)
COMPACT-TV: Court in Peru: Gates, Soros & Co. responsible for Corona
QUOTE
A court in Peru has blamed international elites for the preparation and
execution of the Corona pandemic. This is clear from a statement by judges
Tito Gallegos, Luis Legua and Tony Changaray at the court of the city of Pisco
in the south of the Latin American state.
END QUOTE
Rep. Elise Stefanik Calls for Federal Investigation on Criminal Acts Committed by Gov. Cuomo
in COVID Nursing Home Scandal (VIDEO) (thegatewaypundit.com)
Rep. Elise Stefanik Calls for Federal Investigation on Criminal Acts Committed by Gov. Cuomo in COVID
Nursing Home Scandal (VIDEO)
QUOTE
New York State Rep. Elise Stefanik joined Judge Jeanine Pirro on Saturday night to discuss the news
this week that New York State leaders downplayed the number of COVID Deaths in nursing homes.
New York had the highest rate of deaths of any state in the US and this is due to the inhumane and
murderous policies of Governor Cuomo and his Department of Health.
Back in May we reported that New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo, Health Commissioner Howard
Zucker, MD and Executive Deputy Commissioner Sally Dreslin’s actions led to thousands of deaths in
New York state.
New York’s Department of Health released a ludicrous directive early on in the pandemic in 2020 that forced
nursing homes in New York state to take in infected coronavirus patients.
This insane policy caused several thousand deaths in New York state.
On Thursday the New York State Attorney General admitted that nursing home deaths in New York S tate
were undercounted by as much as 50%.
END QUOTE
Let it be clear that at times politicians and others can be held legally accountable.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/01/morrison-says-craig-kelly-is-not-my-
doctor-evading-question-on-covid-misinformation
Morrison says Craig Kelly 'is not my doctor', evading question on Covid misinformation
QUOTE
Scott Morrison has side-stepped a question highlighting his reluctance to rebuke government MPs spreading
misinformation about Covid-19 treatments and vaccines by declaring Craig Kelly “is not my doctor”.
END QUOTE
QUOTE
If you’ve been imbibing Craig’s Kelly’s Covid monologues over the summer and wondering why Scott
Morrison lets one of his own MPs regularly contradict the official public health advice without rebuke, let me
try to answer your question.
END QUOTE
QUOTE
This drift is likely highly conditional, and realpolitik says the Coalition would like to keep the new pandemic
recruits in its “vote one” column rather than rely on the vagaries of One Nation preference flows or see those
votes bleed to Labor.
If representation and recruitment is an objective, self-styled mavericks like Kelly and his Queensland
sidekick George Christensen have some utility. This duo operates like an extended wink and a nudge; they

tell voters the Coalition is a broad enough church to be a home for fringe views.
Kelly and Christensen, and their relentless courtship of people who like to position themselves against
mainstream orthodoxy, allow that welcoming signal to be sent without senior players in government being
caught on the sticky paper (apart from Michael McCormack, who blunders in periodically trying to court the
politically estranged with all the finesse of an exploding cigar).
Having identified Project Representation, we can move next to Project Turn Down the Volume.
When Morrison mulls the pluses and minuses associated with rebuking Kelly for undermining the
government’s public health messaging, the prime minister faces a genuine substantive dilemma, and that goes
to the risks of amplification.
Morrison slapping down Kelly does two things: it gives the backbencher’s forays a larger audience. Muzzling
Kelly also elevates a semi-professional obscurantist to the status of free speech martyr, and that invites a
cacophonous pile-on from the rightwing bobble heads who screech about the left’s obsession with identity
politics while shovelling identity politics at their audiences.
END QUOTE
What we appear to have arrived is that “FREEDOM OF SPEECH” is what the left is accepting
as to support their mantra and anything else is in violation.
.
As I have already extensively shown in my writings that Nancy Pelosi endorsing the taking of a
State Capitol for 10 years already on Twitter somehow is not considered to be an attack upon the
Government, but when the same is against the Capitol in Washington then well it is completely
different. The same with Senator Kamala Harris financing and also supporting the murderous
riots during 2020 and making clear they would continue AFTER the election, but now somehow
when it comes to the Capital in Washington this is different. Well it may be a shock to many but
as I understand it both Nancy Pelosi and Kamala Harris appear to have been supporting the 6
January incident in different manner. The media however is pretending it all to be different.
The same with this COVID-19 issue, where we really seem to lack any credible reporting other
than by The Epoch Times, which seems to pursue the TRUTH and FACTS.
https://twitter.com/swiss4trumpnow/status/1286081354359341056?lang=en
Neal David Sutz on Twitter: "I saw my sons 2DAY. Cory is a skeleton ...
22 Jul 2020 ... Neal David Sutz · @swiss4trumpnow. MY 2 SONS AND I HAVE BEEN LEFT BEHIND.
THEY NEVER TOLD TRUMP ABOUT ME & MY ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAhi6FzLiwI
Switserland For Trump Founder Speech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzA2XnPY58k
ByoBlu Neal David Sutz SCYTL SWITZERLAND
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/63320946/sos-scream-of-silence-by-neal-sutz
SOS Scream of Silence by Neal Sutz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpAoF44jBAQ
WHO IS TRULY BEHIND THE SCYTL VOTER FRAUD SCANDAL AGAINST TRUMP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aNakrtbAbg
NSW How Not to Prove Your Election Outcome
The last mentioned video actually indicates that voting fraud can be applied in Australia
also.
One has to ask as Neal David Sutz did, why is it that the Swish government remained silent that
even so it had the sole right to the source key of SCYTL program nevertheless it is used in other
countries to fraudulently change vote counting and yet it remained silent?
The Novavax vaccine is effective — and now I’m seriously hoping that’s what I was injected with (msn.com)
(20210203) The Novavax vaccine is effective — and now I’m seriously hoping that’s what I was injected with
QUOTE
Novavax will now submit its data to regulators the world over. The U.K. and the EU bodies are
expected to rule soon — although keep in mind that the latter has yet to green-light AstraZeneca,
which is already distributed in the U.K. The U.K. has ordered 60 million doses of the Novavax vaccine,
and the EU is in talks on a contract to buy 100 million with an option for 100 million more.
END QUOTE
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/coronavirus/russia-covid-vaccine-91-6-effective-with-no-
adverse-side-effects-trial-finds/ar-BB1djN8U?ocid=spartan-dhp-feeds
Russia Covid vaccine '91.6% effective with no adverse side effects', trial finds
QUOTE
A Russian coronavirus jab is 91.6% effective with no adverse side effects, trial results suggest.
Phase three in the trial of the Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V), suggests a two-dose regimen of the vaccine
offers 91.6% efficacy with reports of only mild symptoms - including flu-like symptoms and pain at the
injection site.
Preliminary findings published in The Lancet, are based on analysis of data from nearly 20,000 participants,
three quarters of whom received the vaccine and one quarter received a placebo.
The jab is a two-part vaccine that includes two adenovirus vectors - recombinant human adenovirus type 26
(rAd26-S) and recombinant human adenovirus type 5 (rAd5-S) - which have been modified to express the
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
The adenoviruses are also weakened so that they cannot replicate in human cells and cannot cause disease.
In the trial, participants were given one dose of rAd26-S, followed by a booster dose of rAd5-S 21 days later
According to the researchers, using a different adenovirus vector for the booster vaccination may help create
a more powerful immune response, compared with using the same vector twice.
They suggest this is because it minimises the risk of the immune system developing resistance to the initial
vector.
Dr Inna V Dolzhikova, co-lead author, from the Gamaleya National Research Centre for Epidemiology and
Microbiology in Russia, said: "Our interim analysis of the randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial of Gam-
COVID-Vac in Russia has shown high efficacy, immunogenicity, and a good tolerability profile in
participants aged 18 years or older."
Between September 7 and November 24 last year, a total of 21,977 adults were randomly assigned to receive
the vaccine (16,501) or placebo (5,476).
In the vaccine group 14,964 participants, and 4,902 in the placebo group, received two doses of the vaccine
or placebo and were included in the primary interim efficacy analysis reported on Tuesday.
From 21 days after receiving the first dose - the day of the second dose, 16 cases of symptomatic Covid-19
were confirmed in the vaccine group, and 62 cases in the placebo group - equivalent to an efficacy of 91.6%.
Researchers say the vaccine induced a robust antibody response and T-cell response with data from 342 and
44 participants, respectively.
Six of the 342 participants did not mount an immune response following vaccination, possibly due to older
age or individual characteristics, according to the study.
The authors note that because Covid-19 cases were detected only when participants self-reported symptoms,
followed by a test, the efficacy analysis only includes symptomatic cases of the virus.
They say further research is needed to understand the efficacy of the vaccine on asymptomatic Covid-19, and
transmission.
The median follow-up was 48 days from the first dose, so the study cannot assess the full duration of
protection.
Four deaths were recorded during the trial - three in the vaccine group, and one in the placebo group.
In the vaccine group, one death was associated with a fracture, and two had underlying conditions and
developed symptoms of the virus four to five days after the first dose of the vaccine.
Both participants were deemed to have already been infected before inclusion in the trial.
In the placebo group, the death was associated with a stroke. None of the deaths were deemed to be
associated with vaccination.
The trial included 2,144 participants more than 60 years old, and vaccine efficacy was 91.8% in this group.
The vaccine was well tolerated and safety data from 1,369 of these older adults found that the most common
adverse events were flu-like symptoms and local reaction
END QUOTE
http://www.renegadetribune.com/nurse-developed-bells-palsy-paralysis-after-taking-mrna-covid-vaccine/
Nurse Developed Bell’s Palsy Paralysis After Taking mRNA Covid Vaccine
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/attacking-ourselves-top-doctors-reveal-vaccines-turn-our-
immune-system-against-us
Attacking Ourselves: Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us
https://www.westernjournal.com/health-care-workers-now-refusing-covid-
vaccine/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=conservative-brief-
WJ&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=western-journal&ats_es=%5B-MD5-%5D
Health Care Workers Now Refusing COVID Vaccine
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/60percent-of-nursing-home-staff-in-ohio-are-refusing-
to-get-vaccinated-according-to-the-state-governor/ar-BB1cnNvA?ocid=spartan-ntp-feeds
60% of nursing home staff in Ohio are refusing to get vaccinated, according to the state governor
https://principia-scientific.com/are-vaccine-deaths-being-recorded-as-covid-19-mortalities/
Are Vaccine Deaths Being Recorded As COVID-19 Mortalities?
The problems of course is that those so called “vaccines” may not at all be “vaccines” and so
without proper testing people’s health and wellbeing are placed at risk all over the world.
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/89309/united-states-v-cruikshank/?
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 554, 23 L. Ed. 588 (1876)-proper description of
criminal charges required
Vaccinated Congressman Tests Positive For COVID (thegatewaypundit.com)
Vaccinated Congressman Tests Positive For COVID
https://www.westernjournal.com/240-people-diagnosed-covid-
vaccinated/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=WJBreaking&ff_campaign=breaking&ff_content=we
stern-journal
240 People Diagnosed with COVID After Being Vaccinated
Obviously if the so called “vaccine” is not at all a “vaccine” but merely some “experimental
gene therapy” then obviously this can happen. But, at least the pharmaceutical companies are all
laughing to the bank. And, the politicians and the members of the medical profession and
scientist who are all peddling this rot well they too may have proven that their souls were for
sale.
Lib MP backs vaccine rollout amid pressure (msn.com)
Lib MP backs vaccine rollout amid pressure
QUOTE
Embattled Liberal MP Craig Kelly has finally agreed to support Australia's coronavirus vaccine rollout after
immense political pressure to stop spreading misinformation.
Scott Morrison refuses to publicly condemn Mr Kelly despite doctors and medical experts warning his
Facebook posts are dangerous.
In a carefully worded statement, the Sydney-based MP confirmed he met with the prime minister on
Wednesday.
"I agreed to support the government's vaccine rollout which has been endorsed by medical experts," Mr Kelly
said.
"I have always sought to support the success of our nation's public health response during the pandemic.
"I believe that the spread of misinformation can damage the success of our public health response during the
pandemic."
Despite his backdown, his Facebook page remains littered with articles championing two drugs unapproved
for use in coronavirus patients.
Earlier on Wednesday, Mr Kelly accused the national COVID evidence task force - which is made up of top
medical experts reviewing science continuously - of not being across the latest studies.
"Catch up with the evidence. Yes, you looked at three studies. Go and look at the other 32 studies and come
back," he told reporters.
END QUOTE
Well since Joe Biden Purportedly was inaugurated, certain previously claimed items such as
HCQ suddenly reportedly are after all acceptable for usage. As such, it appears to me that this
was a blatant political strategy, never mind the many who died in the process, to ensure that
Moderna and others were able to make huge amounts of monies when as I understand eventuated
with the HIV issue Fauci simply delayed matters to enrich himself also in the process.
* Seems to me they are operating like a criminal cartel?
**#** Well it appears to me they are creating mass hysteria and themselves so to say operate ad
“Butchers of Bagdad”.
* Does it appears to you that the TGA is cooperating with the charlatans and ignoring that the so
called “vaccines” are not “vaccines” at all?
**#** Consider that I am not medically trained nor that I am a scientist and nevertheless by my
research can expose this then surely the TGA should be able to do so themselves. Perhaps they
are willing to allow for collateral damage to have innocent people suffering a slow and
horrendous death as after all that is what I wrote previously that vaccines for polio were known
to be defective and nevertheless appeared to have been used. And as we were notified that the
Federal Government already had “vaccines” (well what they call “vaccines”) during 2020 being
made and yet without being approved at all then soon the day will come that regardless how
horrendous the effects might be of usage they likely will be slotted in between other so called
“vaccinations”.
* Is this in someway like the cover up by the Parliament about Senator Heffernan’s revelations as
to those allegedly involved in pedophilia?
**#** Well, it seems to me that there are very few politicians who do care, and then when you
consider Kelly that they then place pressure upon him then for sure I view that we better throw in
the prisons those who betray their oath/affirmation to uphold the constitution. Let us put the
deplorable’s into prisons.
* You do not accept that the Government has the powers within the context of the constitution?
**#** Absolutely not. I have no issue with the Bio-Security Act 2015 where it relates to real
human diseases, but not to pursue some pretended virus, that they after more than a year have not
even separated on its own, and use it to unconstitutionally pursue some New World Order. That
to me is a conduct of TREASON. We need to restore law and order and start with imprisoning
those who defy the true meaning and application of the constitution – the Will of We, the People.
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

20210203-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Why To Arrest & Imprison PM Scott Morrison and Co

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

20210203-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Why To Arrest & Imprison PM Scott Morrison and Co

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

20210203-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, it is sickening how we got parliamentarians and others who

To avoid repeating what I published on 31-01-2021 I refer to:

This document can be downloaded from:

Masks don’t work. Masks work.

p1 3-2-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

And, then consider that reportedly Dr Fauci is a financial stakeholder in Moderna:

p2 3-2-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

The non-existent virus: it undercuts

https://t.co/ymE3PIPoVm?amp=1 Cynthiamckinney video

Hansard 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

p7 3-2-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

And let us not overlook:

Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

Mr. DEAKIN.-It is made for the lawyers under this clause.

Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

But let’s look at the credibility of the news media.

p10 3-2-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Let's Examine the Claim That Trump Incited

p11 3-2-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

DOJ Announcement Provides Huge Evidence Trump Didn't Incite Insurrection

“‘Agent Provocateur’ Tactics Seen at Jan 6 US Capitol Protest-interview Michael”

p13 3-2-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

Вам также может понравиться

# INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, it is sickening how we got parliamentarians and others who