Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Elastomeric
Impression
Material
Breakthrough
Written by Richard L. Brown, Jr, DDS Thursday, 01 October 2009
00:00
INTRODUCTION
Perhaps no procedure done on a routine basis in dentistry
contains more uncertainty and yet of holds more importance
for the outcome of care than that of the dental impression.
Every dentist and dental office team member has at some
point anxiously awaited to see if the fruit of their labor has
been captured correctly in the negative form of an
impression. While in the state of unknown, each goes
through a mental checklist of all the choices made to get to
this point. Is the preparation correct, is the tray correct, is
this the best technique for the situation at hand, did the
tissue get managed properly, and finally was the material
the proper one? While each of these variables is a topic of
discussion, the material choice is the one that influences all
the others in some form or another and perhaps can make
the biggest difference.
There is great confusion out there about the types of
materials, their clinically relevant properties, and their
usage. This is further compounded by the fact that there are
some 40 plus brands of one type of impression material
distributed by some nearly 30 separate companies. The
1
CASE REPORT
Figure 9. Close-up view of VPES Figure 10. Gypsum cast: Note the
impression. occlusal detail obtained with the use
of the VPES impression material.
CONCLUSION
Over the years, very few advances have occurred in the
area of dental impression materials. Manufacturers have
attempted to modify and improve existing impression
materials creating a stream of products, that by their nature,
still presented with some of the same basic weaknesses as
originally introduced. While the future of dentistry and dental
materials may lie in the digital realm, it will take time to
make that complete journey. Since this new VPES
technology takes advantage of all the best properties of
everything currently available, regardless of the technique or
delivery method that is employed for final impressions, this
versatile material makes it both easy and reliable to obtain
consistent accurate impressions.
Acknowledgement
Special thanks to Mr. Tom Sano, CDT, G and H Dental Arts,
Torrance, CA, for the fine dental laboratory work done in this
case, and also for the years of personal friendship.
References
1. Cowie RR.
Understanding
impression
materials and
techniques. Dent
Today.
2007;26:108,
110-111.
2. Coy HD. The
selection and
purpose of
dental restorative
materials in
operative
dentistry. Dent
Clin N Amer.
1957;1:65-80.
3. Schulein TM.
Significant
events in the
history of
operative
dentistry. J Hist
Dent.
2005;53:63-72.
4. Craig RG, Hanks
CT. Restorative
Dental Materials.
7th ed. St. Louis,
Mo: Mosby;
1985:253-302.
5. Testing data on
file at GC
America, Inc,
Alsip, Ill; 800-
323-7063.
6. Eames WB,
Sieweke JC,
Wallace SW.
Elastomeric
impression
materials: effect
of bulk on
accuracy. J
Prosthet Dent.
1979;41:304-
307.
7. Shillingburg HT,
Hobo S, Whitsett
LD.
Fundamentals of
Fixed
Prosthodontics.
2nd ed. Chicago,
Ill: Quintessence
Publishing Co;
1981:228.
8. Massad J,
Strong S. Hidden
cost in
removable
overdentures.
Dental
Economics.
2008;98:46-50.
Suggested Readings
Cagna DR, Massad JJ. Vinyl polysiloxane impression
material in removable prosthodontics. Part 2: Immediate
denture and reline impressions. Compend Contin Educ
Dent. 2007;28:519-526.
Bottom of Form