Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
Even though more than one-third of Nepal’s colleges are categorized as community
colleges (UGC, 2012), the biggest missing piece in Nepal’s higher education is
community engagement. The irony is rooted in the fact that most of the colleges are
satellite campuses affiliated with a handful of universities, offering bachelor and mas-
ter’s degrees on the basis of centralized curricula and externally administered high
stake examinations. Now that the country is poised to harness economic potentials
by embracing a federal structure, higher education needs to unleash itself from the
tether of pseudo-elitist ivory-tower model in favor of community-engaged scholarly
activities geared toward the development of skills and entrepreneurship. Most of the
scholars we spoke to emphasized skills development through community-based col-
leges that promote accessible job-oriented skills for adult students through appren-
ticeship, professional education, and technical and vocational education and training.
This chapter presents an overview of current Nepalese higher education. Results are
based on quantitative and qualitative data collected over the past two years. Results
support an argument for a strong need for a community-engagement model of
higher education to allow youth an opportunity to maximize local resources, over-
AuQ1 come high unemployment rates, and end socialcultural discrimination.
Because the higher education system in Nepal is criticized for producing the
human resource that doesn’t fit the demand of the job market. It is an irony
that there is a dearth of technical man power in the local market on one hand
and at the same time thousands of students and youths are leaving the country
citing that there is lack of employment opportunities in Nepal. I think this can
be minimized with the establishment of technical community colleges that
cater to the needs of the local market.
–– Study participant
Introduction
Since the first university in Nepal – Tribhuvan University (TU) was established
in 1959 – many public institutions have opened. In fact, the first public college,
Current structure
All universities established in Nepal are public universities with more or less simi-
lar structures. The constituent campuses (also known as colleges) are an integral
part of their respective universities, and are located in main cities of the country.
All institutions that are non-constituent campuses are called affiliated campuses.
Affiliated campuses are located throughout the country and are all affiliated with
a specific university. They follow the same admission requirements, curricula, and
examination as the university to which they are affiliated with. There are two types
of non-affiliated colleges: (1) public colleges, which are community funded and,
therefore, are sometimes referred to as community colleges, and (2) private col-
leges, which although privately funded, otherwise operate in the same ways as do
Student enrollment
Enrollment wise, students are pretty much evenly distributed among the three
types of institutions previously discussed. The share of community campuses is
32.8% while the share of constituent campuses is 31.4% and that of private cam-
puses is 35.8%. Looking at the level of degree enrollment distribution, the vast
number of students (82.52%) is at bachelor’s level, followed by 17.4% at the
master’s level. These figures for MPhil and PhD are less than 1%. Enrollments
in education, management, and humanities are 34%, 30.5%, and 20.02% respec-
tively. For engineering, medicine, and science and technology, this value is 5%,
4.5%, and 4.2% respectively.
Students in public and community colleges, similar to the university, take col-
lege courses during morning or evening shifts. Most Nepalese undergraduate
students are full-time students, and may not work elsewhere while studying. As a
cultural norm, parents pay the costs of education for their children, which often
influences the selection of majors. Because of the growing number of unem-
ployed graduates, sometimes college students have little motivation or no interest
in pursuing a traditional college degree (Khaniya, 2007). There are many cases in
which students have dropped their programs or have frequently changed majors.
(1) How do scholars report the current status of higher education in Nepal?
(2) What are the perceptions of scholars on existing or emerging community
colleges in Nepal?
Research method
The purpose of this study is to examine current higher education in Nepal as per-
ceived by the Nepali higher education leaders and diaspora scholars. As a cross-
sectional survey research, both quantitative (numerical) and qualitative (words)
Frequency Percent
Gender
Male 164 61.9%
Female 41 15.5%
Citizenship status
Nepali citizen 208 78.5%
Non-Nepali 20 8.1%
Non-resident Nepali 20 8.1%
Current position
Student 57 21.5%
Faculty 64 24.2%
Other (admin/ 144 54.3%
professional)
Highest education
Doctoral degree 55 20.8%
Master’s degree 104 39.2%
Bachelor’s degree 42 15.8%
Field of study
Business 18 6.8%
Social sciences 73 27.5%
Education/Teaching 51 19.2%
Sciences/Medicine 54 20.4%
Country of
Residence
United States 62 23.4%
Nepal 102 38.5%
Other countries 33 12.5%
Age groups
18–25 34 12.8%
26–33 46 17.4%
34–41 51 19.2%
42–49 36 13.6%
50 and above 37 14.0%
Note. The cumulative percentage/frequency total is not the equal in each variable because of
some missing data.
Findings
Sample characteristics
As shown in Table 16.1, the majority of participants of this study were male
(61.9% or 164 individuals) as compared to females (15.5%, 41). Similarly, 78.5%
(208) of total participants were Nepali citizens, 8.1% (20) were non-Nepali, and
another 8.1% (20) were non-resident Nepali (NRN). When asked their high-
est education, 39.2% (104) of participants reported earning a master’s degree,
20.8% (55) a doctoral degree, and 15.8% (42) a bachelor’s degree. The field
of study of participants was diverse: business 6.8% (18), social sciences 27.5%
(73), education/teaching 19.2% (51), and sciences/medicines 20.4% (54). The
age group 18–25 composed 12.8% (34), 26–33 constituted 17.4% (46), 34–41
equalled 19.2% (51), 42–49 totalled 13.6% (36), and 50 and above represented
14% (37). At the time of taking survey, 38.5% of participants (102) self-reported
Nepal as their country of residence, 23.4% (62) the United States, and 12.5%
(33) other countries (which primarily included Canada, United Kingdom, Korea,
and Norway)
15032-3066e-2pass-r02.indd 220
Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Strongly Disagree
(1) (2) Disagree (3) (4) (5)
8/2/2019 5:58:29 PM
Assessing Nepal’s higher education 221
that Nepalese institutions should adopt course acceptance and credit transfer sys-
tem. Similarly, 86 participants (32%) noted that central university systems (e.g.,
Tribhuvan University) should not control the curriculum and examinations of
colleges in Nepal. In another question, 189 participants (71.3%) indicated a
strong need for a decentralized community based system of colleges in Nepal.
While running further analysis, male participants were not statistically signifi-
cant in their opinions regarding the current status of Nepalese higher educa-
tion (in all above five statements, p >.5). While running ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis
tests other demographic variables such as citizenship status (whether the partici-
pants were Nepalese, non-Nepalese, or non-Nepalese resident), current position
(whether they were student, faculty, or professionals), highest education received
(doctoral degree, master’s degree, or bachelor’s degree), field of study (business,
social science, education, or science), and age group (five levels) were not statisti-
cally different on these five statements.
However, a statistically significant difference was found among the three
group of countries of residence (Nepal, the United States, or elsewhere) on the
following items: “Current higher education system in Nepal is acceptable to me”
(F(2,193) = 4.534, p = .012); “Central university systems should control the cur-
riculum and examinations of colleges in Nepal” (F (2, 191) = 3.396, p = .036);
and “Colleges should have courses acceptable and a credit transfer system in
Nepal” (F (2, 193) = 3.234, p = .042). Participants who were living in the United
States and Nepal differed significantly on their views regarding current higher
education in Nepal (p = 0.48) as well as central university systems controlling the
curriculum and examinations of colleges (p = .028).
When asking participants to identify or categorize existing colleges in Nepal
(Table 16.3), 38.5% of survey participants (102) reported that Tribhuvan-affil-
iated campuses are not community colleges, whereas 21.9% (58) believed they
were. Similarly, 31.7% of participants (84) considered those colleges with tech-
nical and vocational programs (affiliated with CTEVT) as community colleges
in Nepal, whereas 22.7% (60) did not think so. Similarly, 44.7% of participants
(119) agreed that the Nepalese college curriculum does not correspond to com-
munity needs, and 33.9% of participants (90) reported that college degrees do
not support workforce development in Nepal.
Regarding the need and scope of community college programs, the majority of
participants agreed on the following statement: “Community colleges should be
considered in the Nepalese higher education structure” (65.9%, 175); “Commu-
nity college would help reduce socio-cultural discrimination in Nepal” (60.8%,
161); “The establishment of community colleges could provide an opportunity
for youth to acquire tangible workforce skills” (67.1%, 178); “There is a need of
practical job-oriented two-year associate degree programs” (67.5%, 179); and
“A new system of community colleges would be complementary to what exists
in Nepal” (63%, 167).
Further analysis revealed that participants who identified as “Nepali” and
“non-resident Nepali” (NRN) differed significantly on their views regarding
two statements: “The establishment of community college could provide an
8/2/2019 5:58:29 PM
Assessing Nepal’s higher education 223
opportunity for youth to acquire tangible workplace skills” (p = 0.006) as well as
“There is a need of practical job-oriented two-year associate degree programs”
(p = .033).
Similarly, “students” and “faculty” were statistically significant on their views
on “University-affiliated campuses (e.g., Tri-Chandra Campus) are considered
community colleges in Nepal” (p =. 000). Participants who hold a doctoral
degree and master’s degree (p = .007), or between doctoral degree and bach-
elor’s degree (p = .000), or participants aged group 34–41 or higher differed
significantly on whether university-affiliated campuses were considered commu-
nity colleges. However, their current status (whether student, or faculty, or pro-
fessional), highest education status (doctoral or master’s degree or a bachelor’s
degree), and age groups did not make any statistical different on their views on
other survey items.
Some participants who have worked in Nepal as well as in the United States
assumed CTEVT programs or technical job-oriented programs, which are run
locally, as a part of community college degrees, but they questioned the facts such
course credits are not transferable to regular universities. One participant said:
“Most of the affiliated colleges in some ways resemble the ‘community college’
structure but almost all of them severely lack the diversity of programs that a typi-
cal community college would offer.” Another participant added the challenges of
defining community colleges, “All of them [colleges] are controlled or promoted
by their respective universities in all aspects such as academic, administrative and
economic activities.”
Some participants gave a comparative perspectives of Nepalese community
colleges and American colleges. One participant suggested that we should
Community colleges in Nepal are very rare species. Because, the partici-
pation of community people at the decision level making in education is
not encouraging. The community schools/plus-two colleges [11th and
12th grades] are places of political representatives and affiliates, often in
conflicts.
Community colleges with a focus on skill based courses would provide more
students basic professional skills as a skilled workforce for the nation. There-
fore, it is good idea to develop such colleges to enhance employability of
graduates of colleges and also provide them opportunity to continue higher
education after they get set of skills required for employment.
Nepalese educators who have worked in US higher education also offered how
the government of Nepal would strengthen the existing community-based col-
leges or keep different from current system. One participant mentioned:
I think community colleges are run by local board of directors and per-
haps run by local or nation grants. This means local economy may prosper
through grants and employment. Also, if credits could be transferred to uni-
versities, students might opt to attend community colleges since they are
relatively cheaper.
One or two participants questioned the ideal dream of community colleges sys-
tem, its quality, its affordability, its autonomy, and its curriculum and pedagogy,
considering unstable government and limited resources, “otherwise, this will
only create opportunities to politicians to recruit some of their cadres to job”.
Another scholar suggested: “It will require a serious policy work and more, but it
should be a good option, esp. since more and more students will be completing
grade 12th and existing colleges may not have enough seats for all.”
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to reviewers as well as colleagues, Rosalind Latiner Raby,
Shyam Sharma, Dionne Hudgins, Thaddeus Price Jr, Roshelle Lemon-Howard,
Mia Johnson, and Khadijah Ali-Coleman, who provided comments on the earlier
draft. This chapter is based on previously published material (Bista & Gaulee,
2018). Some information has been updated and new set of data analysis has been
included. Some data and materials are reprinted with permission.
References
Alphonse, X. (2013). The Indian community college system: Inspiration from com-
munity colleges in the United States. In N. Jha (Ed.), The U.S. community college
model: Potential for applications in India (pp. 17–22). New York, NY: Institute of
International Education.
Bista, K., & Gaulee, U. (2018). Re-envisioning community colleges in Nepal: Pre-
paring all students for success. In R.L. Raby & E.J. Valeau (Eds.), Handbook of
comparative studies on community colleges and global counterparts (pp. 161–176).
New York, NY: Springer.