Q 2 Discuss the cultural dimensions of the Indian work
force.
The foundation for understanding the unique work practices
at a country level can be best be understood by 1st understanding the cultural aspects of the countries work force. The pioneering work done by Dutch scientist, geert hofstede is useful tool in understanding the cultural differences use to differentiate countries. He indentified 5 cultural dimensioners around which countries have been clustered. The dimensioners are power distance uncertainty avoidance, individualism masculinity and long term orientation.geert hofstede dimensioners are based on research conducted among over 1000 IBM employees working globally. While there continued to be other studies like the globe (Global leader ship organizational behavior effectiveness) project and trompernaars,’ frame work half steps models are most popular’.
Power Distance
Power distance is the extent to which less powerful members
of institutions and organizations accept the power is distributed unequally. Countries in which people blindly obey the orders of superiors have high power distance.
A high power distance country has norms, values and
believes that support Inequality is good. Everyone has a place, some are high, and some are low Most people should be dependent on a leader, the powerful are entitled to privileges,
The powerful should yield there power.Indias scores 77 on
power distance, indicating high power distance, as a result of inequalities both at the level of the society as well as the at the wok place. Indian organizations typically, have hierarchal structures, position yields power and sub ordination is acceptable.
The dimension of high power distance at the work place
can be best understood as:
People dislike work and try to avoid it
managers believe that they must adopt theory X leadership style, that is they must be authoritarian, and the force work us to perform and need to supervise their sub ordinates closely Organizational structures and systems tend to match the assumption regarding leadership and motivation Decision making is centralized those at the top make most of the decisions organizations tend to have tall structures They have a large proportion to supervisor personnel , ad The people at the lower level often will have low job qualifications
Uncertainty avoidance
Uncertainty avoidance is the extent to which people feel
threatened by ambiguous situations and have created believes and institutions that try to avoid this India scores 40 indicating low to average uncertainty avoidance characterizes. Countries With low uncertainty avoidance have people who have more willing to accept the risks are associated with the unknown, and that life must will go on in spite of this.
Specifically uncertainty avoidance countries are
characterized by norms values and believe which accept that:
Conflict should not be avoided
Deviant people and ideas should be tolerated Laws are not very important and need not necessary be followed Experts and authorities are not always correct and consensus is not important
Low uncertainty avoidance societies such as ours have
organizations setting with less structuring of activities fewer written rules, more risk taking by managers, higher labor turn over and more ambitious employees such an organization encourages employees to use there, initiative and assume responsibility for their action. Denmark Great Britain is good examples for low uncertainty avoidance cultures. Germany, Japan and Spain typify uncertainty avoindeecne societies.
Individualism
Individualism is the tendency of people to look after
themselves and the family only the opposite of this is collectivism which refers the tendency of the people, to belong to groups and to look each after in exchange for loyalty India scores 48 on Individualism , indication somewhat low scores, therefore ,tending collectivistic society Collectivistic countries believe this:
Once identity is based on once group membership
Group decision is making is best Groups protect individuals in the exchanger for there loyalty to the group
Organization is collectivist’s society’s trend to promote
nepotism in selecting managers. In contrast, individualistic societies, favoritism shown to friends & relatives is considered unfair & illegal. Further organizations in collectivist cultures base promotions mostly on seniority and age, where as in individualist societies, they are based on ones performance. Finally in collectivist cultures, imp decisions are made by older and seniors managers as opposed to individualist cultures, where decision making is an individual’s responsibility
Individualism is common in the US, Canada, Australia,
Denmark ad Sweden the people of India Indonesia, Pakistan and number of South American countries exhibit collectivism
Masculity
Masculity refers to a situation in which the dominant values in a
society are success, money and other material things. Holfsted measured this dimension on a continuum raging from masculity to femininity. India scores 56 tending to be close to masculity and femininity
In highly femininity societies jobs are clearly defined by gender.
There are men’s jobs & women’s jobs. Men’s usually choose jobs that are associated with long term careers. Women usually choose jobs that are associated with short term employment before marriage. Q 3 Explain the need for human resource Planning system
The organizations would move over a long duration. These
long-term objectives are then broken down into specific strategies and short-term goals for each of the units/departments. In an organization, the cumulative effect of all these would ltimatelylead to the long-term goal. Short-term goals are constantly in need of adaptation to the changing environment, both external and internal.
For an organization analysis, there are three essential
requirements:
(1) An adequate number of employees available to ensure
fulfillment of the business operation (2) The employee performance is up to the required standard; and (3) The working environment in their units/departments is conducive to fulfillment of tasks.
In order to ensure the first two requirements a human resource
inventory needs to be made. Data regarding positions, qualifications, vacancies, replacements and training time required for replacements have to be worked out. Job standards must also be worked out.
Various efficiency and productivity indexes, or ratios such a
productivity ratios, cost per unit etc, can be worked out to determine not only efficiency but also adequacy, in terms of under-manning or over-manning, of the workforce.
An important dimension of organizational need-based analysis is
the diagnosis of the state of the organization "climate" or “culture”. While rules, procedures, systems and methods all contribute to the making of the environment, much of it is also determined by the attitude that the "people" have in the organization-for instance, the attitude that top management has towards its subordinate staff and the attitudes that members have towards work, Managers and company procedures. These attitudes are learnt they result from the person’s experience both within and outside the organization, and training inputs could be used to effect changes of attitude and consequently of the organizational climate.
In analyzing the organization climate, both direct and indirect
methods could be used. Direct methods are observation, use of questionnaires, and interviews. Reliance or indirect methods would not give a clear understanding of the attitudes and predispositions of employees. In fact, factors such as low absenteeism and low turnover are not by themselves indicators of positive or negative attitudes, and high or low morale. It would be better to make a careful analysis and study each indicator in a particular situation in conjunction with more direct methods like attitude surveys. Analysis and interpretation of the data may give clear clues not only to attitudinal training needs but possibly also to kill training needs.
Task Analysis
This activity entails a detailed examination of each job, its
components, its various operations and the conditions under which it has to be performed. The focus here is on the "task" itself and the training required to perform it, rather than on the individual. Analysis of the job and its various components will indicate the skills and training required to perform the job at the required standard. Standard of Performance: Every job has an expected standard of performance (SOP). Unless such standards are attained, not only will inter-related jobs suffer, but organizational viability will be affected, and so will the expectations that have been set for that particular job itself. If the standards set for the performance of a job are known, then it is possible to know whether the job is being performed at the desired level of output or not. Knowledge of the "task" will help in understanding what skills, knowledge and attitudes an employee should have. Methods: If an employee is asked to perform a job, the exact components of the job and the standard of performance must be known. Task analysis entails not merely a simple listing of the various job components, but also of the various sub-tasks.
Conventional methods of job analysis are usually suitable for task
analysis. They are:
1. Literature review regarding the job.
2. Job observation, 3. Data Collection regarding job interviews.
For blue-collar employees, more precise industrial-engineering
techniques, like time and motion studies, could be used, and for white-collar employees, work sampling observation, interviews, and job performance data analysis could be employed. The focus in task analysis approach to identifying training needs is with the clear objective of enhancing the performance standard of a given task. This information is then utilized to establish the training program me for the employee. It helps identify the skill required, either in terms of education or training, to perform the job, knowledge, and finally attitudinal pre-dispositions such as the attitudes, towards safety, or interpersonal competence that will ensure that the job is performed optimally. 3 Individual Analysis
Individual analysis is the third component in identifying training
needs. The focus of individual analysis is on the individual employee, his abilities, and the inputs required for job performance, or individual growth and development in terms of career planning. The common source for this needs analysis usually forms parts of the performance assessment process. Clues to training needs can also come from an analysis of an individual’s or a group’s typical behavior. The primary sources of such information are:
(1) Observation at place or work, examination of job schedules,
quantum of spoilage, wastage, and clues about interpersonal relations of the employees
(2) Interviews with superiors and employees;
(3) Comparative studies of good vs. poor employees, to identify
differences, skills and training gaps
(4) Personnel records
(5) Production report
(6) Review of literature regarding the job and machines used.
Job-knowledge tests, work sampling and diagnostic psychological tests also provide information about employees