Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Students studying ACCA F8 (Audit and Assurance) and P7 (Advanced Audit and
Assurance) must be familiar with the auditor’s report and the opinion contained
therein as well as the circumstances in which the opinion is arrived at.
The objective of the audit is for the independent auditor to express an opinion as to
whether the financial statements of an entity give a ‘true and fair view’ (or ‘present
fairly, in all material respects’) in accordance with that particular financial reporting
framework and comply with statutory requirements.
The auditor’s reports are dealt with in ISA 700 (revised) ‘The Independent Auditor’s
Report on a Complete Set of General Purpose Financial Statements’.
This article looks at the different opinions an auditor may give on a set of financial
statements and looks at some illustrative examples of when the opinions are
appropriate.
In forming their opinion, an auditor must evaluate all the audit evidence collated by
them during the course of the audit. In evaluating this evidence, the auditor must
decide whether they have obtained (as a result of that evidence), reasonable
assurance that the financial statements of the reporting entity are free from material
misstatement. In addition, the auditor must also look at the effect of any identified
misstatements within the financial statements and consider their effect also.
The following elements make up the auditor’s report on a set of general purpose
financial statements:
Title;
Addressee;
Introductory paragraph that identifies the financial statements audited;
A description of management’s responsibility for the preparation of the
financial statements;
A description of the auditor’s responsibility to express an opinion on the
financial statements which includes:
- reference to the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs); and
- a description of the work the auditor performs in an audit
The opinion paragraph;
Where relevant, an emphasis of matter paragraph;
Date of the report;
Auditor’s signature; and
Auditor’s address
An unqualified audit opinion is given when, in the opinion of the auditor, the financial
statements give a true and fair view (or present fairly, in all material respects) and
are prepared in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
During the course of the audit, the auditor may have identified some uncorrected
misstatements which management have decided not to correct. As long as these
misstatements are immaterial, both individually and when aggregated, the auditor
can still express an unqualified opinion. Remember that ‘tolerable error’ (also
referred to as the ‘materiality level’) is the error the auditor is willing to accept and
still conclude the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
It is important that students understand the concept of ‘tolerable error’. Consider the
following example:
Illustration
Alicia Enterprises Inc has prepared their financial statements for the year ended 31
December 2008. Revenue amounts to $2,500,000 and profit before tax amounts to
$760,000. Net assets amount to $4,500,000. During the course of the audit the
auditors discovered that a prepayment amounting to $1,500 had been omitted from
the financial statements. The directors do not wish to amend the financial
statements as a result of the omission.
Solution
Clearly the omission is immaterial at less than 1% of profit before tax and even less
in relation to net assets. The auditor can still issue an unqualified opinion even
though the directors do not wish to correct the misstatement.
Qualified Opinion
A qualified opinion is given when the auditor concludes that an unqualified opinion is
not appropriate in the circumstances but the effect of any disagreement with
management, or scope limitation, is not so material and pervasive to warrant an
adverse or disclaimer of opinion.
A qualified opinion is expressed as being ‘except for’ the effects of the matter(s)
which the qualification relates.
Illustration
Alex Enterprises Inc has prepared their financial statements for the year ended 31
March 2009. On 14 April 2009 your firm was appointed as their new auditors as their
previous firm had to resign as they no longer had the resources available to deal with
the audit efficiently.
The financial statements of Alex Enterprises Inc shows closing inventory amounting
to $17.5 million, which is highly material to the financial statements. During the
course of the audit, the auditor has gathered sufficient and appropriate audit
evidence to support the opening balances of Alex Enterprises Inc as at 1 April 2008.
However, your firm were not appointed as auditors until 14 April 2009 (two weeks
after the year end inventory count was performed). The previous audit firm also did
not attend the inventory count.
Solution
As the audit firm had not attended the inventory count they were unable to confirm
the existence and condition of stock and to confirm that the procedures adopted by
management had either been complied with or would have reduced the risk of
material misstatement in relation to inventory. A qualified opinion ‘except for’ should
be given in these circumstances.
Adverse Opinion
Illustration
Lucas Enterprises Inc has prepared their financial statements for the year ended 31
December 2008. Revenue amounts to $16 million, profit before taxation amounts to
$1.3 million and net assets amount to $1.8 million.
Solution
Clearly the Defined Benefit Pension Scheme needs to be included in the financial
statements of Lucas Enterprises Inc. However, without the actuarial information, the
accounting input cannot be made into the financial statements. The accounting input
would clearly affect both the statement of financial position and the statement of
comprehensive income. In this situation, because of the material aspect of the
issue, an adverse opinion should be given because the financial statements will not
give a true and fair view (or present fairly, in all material respects).
Disclaimer
A disclaimer of opinion is given by the auditor when the possible effect of a scope
limitation is so material and pervasive that the auditor has not been able to gather
sufficient appropriate audit evidence and is therefore unable to express an opinion
on the financial statements. By definition, a disclaimer is not an opinion.
Illustration
DodgyClients Inc have prepared their financial statements for the year ended 31
December 2008. During the course of the audit the auditors failed to gather
sufficient evidence to support the amounts disclosed in the financial statements. The
auditors had also concluded that during the year there had been a substantial failing
in the internal control systems in that the systems did not prevent, detect or correct
errors or misstatements. The Directors said that there had been a flood in the year
which resulted in a mass of information being destroyed. The auditors had also
discovered that material differences had been written off to the statement of
comprehensive income with the narrative ‘correction to closing SoFP balance’ but
with no supporting evidence
to substantiate the ‘correction’. The Directors are of the opinion that the financial
statements give a fair reflection of their expectations for the year despite the auditors
not being able to generate the evidence to support the amounts and disclosures
contained within them.
Solution
Clearly in this situation, the auditors cannot express an opinion on the financial
statements and as such should issue a disclaimer
Illustration
Smyth Enterprises Inc is the defendant in a legal case relating to the infringement of
copyright. Smyth Enterprises has lodged a counter-claim and preliminary hearings
are in the process of being heard. The legal advisers have said that the outcome
cannot be predicted and no provisions have been made in the financial statements
as a result. The case is considered to be significant.
Solution
Conclusion
The report of the auditors is pivotal to the auditing profession. Students must have
an awareness of when an audit opinion is appropriate and in which circumstances.
The work of an auditor in real life is mainly judgement-based and professional
judgement should be demonstrated in examinations as well. When considering the
potential qualification of an auditor’s opinion (or even adverse or disclaimer) bring in
the provisions of ISA 260 (revised and redrafted) ‘Communication With Those
Charged With Governance’ and what this standard says in relation to advising
management as to problems encountered during the audit which would potentially
give rise to a qualified, adverse or disclaimed audit opinion - this will demonstrating
an element of ‘thinking outside the box’!