Tesla Electromotive Car English

Just excerpts
Introduction
Energy independence and "no paid" electrical energy are different things. Without paid, electric energy
can be called conditionally, when it is received, regardless of the sellers of this strategically important product,
for your existence and your loved ones, in the modern conditions of our civilization.
Electric energy from modern realities is a commodity, the most vital determining one. The very
existence of us in modern society, or in solitude, as a civilized individual, enjoying the benefits of technological
progress.
The modern world-eating structure of society will never allow an affordable and cheap, the most
popular commodity - like electricity. Do not harbor illusions, this type of product will only rise in price, as well as
the means of obtaining it. Storage in the form of rechargeable batteries will be cost optimized to market
conditions. Work will be done to ensure fast charging of these batteries. All for one purpose, to provide
high-volume sales of all the electricity needed for vehicles. There is a lot of work in this area. Such research is
not carried out on the creation of efficient devices, motors and other devices that spend less and produce more.
If there are such studies and results, they are immediately brought under the control of governments and task
forces. Let it go to the mass,
This material is for those who want to decide for themselves and have energy independence, albeit
small, and not be the average consumer who pays the invoices. The money in your wallet is a tool that can be
useful for other purposes. The most interesting thing is that they tend to run out at the most unnecessary
moment.
Serge Rakarsky
Kiev. Ukraine. 2019
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page one of 58
“Great minds set goals for themselves; other people follow their desires. "
Irving, Washington
I create this guide on the principle, “ how i would like to be given similar material ", For
self-production of a desktop device.
I think superficial simplicity is an illusion. When working out a specific device, many
different nuances arise. In order to get a truly working device with a "self-propelled closed
system", you need to be precise in coordinating each element and the algorithm of work as a
whole. At the heart of any electromechanical device is an algorithm for the interactions of
magnetism, electromagnetism, electrodynamics and mechanics. The electrical control circuits
serve the intended algorithm. Therefore, the given electrical diagrams in various sources, in
most cases, do not reflect the real
picture and
the capabilities of a particular device.
The description of devices in this manual will be built, the main sections: by
- detailed analysis of the algorithm and engineering solutions of the device; ( We will not
disassemble the postulates of physics, dispute certain points, since it is at least unreasonable
to come into conflict with the empirically obtained laws of physics and engineering calculation
methods, and this is proved by this material);
- design features and dimensions of elements; DIY manufacturing options, including the
manufacture of special devices; calculations of structural elements and parameters;
- the procedure for manufacturing and assembling, both elements and the whole structure;
setting up and organizing the work algorithm;
Even for a small desktop design, you will have to build a production algorithm and work
order. You will be able to assess in reality how the result is achieved and that any product has
material, emotional, and temporary costs. The average person does not value creativity, he
believes that a creative person is obliged to give everything for free, but without an idea there is
nothing, and cannot be. But to translate the idea into a real device, there is still more work to be
done.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 2 of 58

Devices are obtained from a variety of components, with the appropriate
algorithm design, manufacturing,
assembly, configuration and operation.
The work schedule is as follows:
one. Device idea ( options are suggested in this manual, and
several design options can be obtained from each idea)
2. Design work ( design; calculations; determination of the possibility of using standard

components: determination and calculation of manufactured components and assemblies;
preparation of drawings and diagrams, determination of the list of activities and works;
Development of a schedule, work sequence, etc.)
3. Ordering components for manufacturing on production equipment, purchasing standard

parts and radio components. Manufacturing
snap and subsidiary mechanisms for
making elements or technological chain.
four. Manufacturing of structural elements and assembly of a prototype, performance check
based on calculations and solutions.
The most crucial moment, because you can return to
initial design, to change the parameters of both the entire structure and its elements
five. Debugging the operation algorithm with satisfactory performance indicators.
6. Registration of design and operational documentation for the production cycle, repair and
maintenance. If you think that this item is superfluous, no one will slave you. But after a while,
you will need to remember everything, believe me, everything needs to be recorded on paper,
not even on an electronic medium.
And so, ideas, and ways of implementation. In the manual, we will operate with terms
and definitions within the framework of traditional physics. If they have my own, I will define
them. True, my practice has shown that this is more of a substitution, instead of clarifying the
already existing definitions and terms, nothing changes fatefully.
I will try to execute constructively according to the simplest option, but sometimes the
goal of simplicity leads to the opposite, non-working option.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Electronic Components, we will build on plain
elementary base using logic to a minimum.
And so we went, ordeals with the first product and its variants. But first, let's look at
some points.
Let's remember which model the project started with: https://youtu.be/Al5qI17G6hU
I thought that nothing significant would come out of this model, and it would take the
place of training for creating such devices. But I was wrong. With several attempts, the
development of the concept, the design took real parameters to create a decent model of the
device without fuel generation of electricity. A motor generator is even more like a convector. We
can say that the rotation of the rotor with zero resistance to rotation. I do not consider rotor
torque for mechanical loading, only for displacement
poles relatively cheeks coils motor

generator. I want to note right away, since I am a dreamer, and I can see more, in this project,
we conditionally implement a drawing from N. Tesla's patent, according to all the classical
canons of the genre. From a two-phase generator to a two-phase motor-generator-convector
without fuel:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page four of 58
Motor - Generator " Not classic - Classic »[MG-RАGEN]
Description of construction No. 1 (pair of poles, stator)
Structurally, the product is of an axial type, and all elements of the motor, as well as the
generator, the rotor and stator, are inherent in it. Since we have a motor generator, we have two stators
and one common rotor.
The motor has two coils, the core of which is made in the form of a hemisphere or " lemon
wedges ". Along the edges of these cores, wound
special double bifilar winding ( or
quadrifilar). We place these coils symmetrically on the motor stator panel, so that the outer
hemisphere of the coil along the core forms a full regular circle. Panel material can vary from
plywood to aluminum sheet. It must be non-magnetic ( does not magnetize) and desirable do not
conduct current. Core material Composite ( another name amorphous
ferritic materials). Composition of the composite: 70% Fe 3 O four ( iron oxide ) in powder and 30%
resin ( epoxy glue or any other material,
able to bind ferrite powder into a solid structure),
advantages: magnetization more> , 1.5 Tesla, low magnetic memory. The ability to make the
required form in a domestic environment. Practice has shown that it is effective to use powder
for laser printers, the issue of price. We will consider how to do all this below.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page five of 58
Rotor. The material must be used so that it is not magnetic and withstands the
maximum rotational speed. I suggest making it from one layer or three, as you like. We have a
four-pole rotor. As you can see, we have a trapezoid pole shape, this is the optimal
the form for

axial machines. IN
otherwise you can

use rectangle
and in the most extreme case (without
fish, and cancer fish)
round magnets. it
associated with one-time
covering impact
conductor magnetic
stream.
Most budgetary
The way, for a tabletop model, is to use a type-setting magnet and patch pole pieces made of
soft magnetic material.
For example, we have the thickness of the base of the rotor blade, 5 mm. We use
plywood, plexiglass or aluminum sheet. We mark the area of one pole, according to the pattern
of which we make eight pole plates. Ordinary steel, pre-hardened and formatted, will do. The
thickness of the pole piece should not be thinner than 1/3 and not more than 1/2 of the thickness
of the magnet, choose magnets, their thickness should be 5 mm.
You will see something like this at the magnet seller. The diameter of the magnet can
be any, but our choice is 5 mm. In the place of the pole of the rotor panel, we mark how many
our magnets will fit there. The distance between the magnets should be 1.5-2.0 mm. We do
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

holes, all holes must be symmetrical about the axis, in all pole assemblies. We insert the
magnets with the corresponding pole orientation into the holes. Apply pole pads on both sides.
Pole straps can also be made on fixed two poles. Before applying the overlays, the free spaces
on the rotor plane are smeared with epoxy glue (or another of your choice).
It is also possible to make, even on top of the rotor panel, to the thickness of the pole
plate, a plate with the diameter of the main rotor panel, and holes for the pole plate, glue it on
both sides of the rotor or fasten it with rivets. This pad will provide a rigid fixation of the pole
pads, and prevent the pole pads from shifting or detaching at high rotor speeds.
A rotor is a product that is rigidly attached to an axle and rotates with the axis or is
mounted on an axis and rotates around a rigidly fixed
axis. Choice produced of considerations
efficiency. In our design, both options are acceptable, the second is preferable. Since the rotor
does not transmit torque to the consumer.
The rotor assembly requires balancing, otherwise the structure may collapse.
If it is possible to order this structural element, make it from professional

craftsmen, or place an order with a company with the appropriate equipment, this is the
best option, only the manufacturer must carry out a complete balancing of the product.
The generator, and why a similar frame winding option was adopted. Ampere Power!
When a current occurs in a conductor, a magnetic vortex flow arises around it, which has a
vector force of opposition to the direction of movement of the magnetic pole. In any case, when
these two fields come into contact, we get the rotor response. in the form of braking in the
direction of rotation.
Make
a generator with an open wire is not interesting to us. In the model under consideration, the
generator panel just has an open conductor type.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The only difference is that the magnetic or, more correctly, the electromagnetic field
around the conductor has a spiral vortex shape. Like a spring around a rod. This judgment is in
no way at variance with the empirical data on the force field around the conductor.
Official science calls it the electromagnetic field, and its radiation - Radiant (Radiant
radiation). We also have a magnetic field, a magnetic dipole. According to the official science,
according to Maxwell's equation, it has a total result equal to ZERO. We will operate with
conventional empirically obtained knowledge, traditional physics.
And so is the screening of the fields. Any electrical wire is freely shielded, but it is much
more difficult to shield a magnet, this is a super task when creating magnetic propulsion devices.
Most importantly, the magnetic flux from a permanent magnet permeates
electric conductor in screen, with by all

the ensuing consequences, and the electric field around the conductor through the screen
breaks out with difficulty. Suffice it to recall the Faraday Cage Effect for screening electric fields.
Let's remember my mention of the Tesla transformer. Few people know that Nikola
Tesla regularly used screening
primary windings from secondary windings
transformer. IN Wikipedia , on the page dedicated to the Nikola Tesla coil there is a picture with
the name: [ File: Tesla's drawing of 1899 -
Tesla Evolution transformer.png ]
To the uninitiated, these drawings, from the materials of N. Tesla of the late 19th
century, will seem childish and that modern generators are more thoughtful and efficient. I will
express my opinion, except for N.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Tesla also patented his transformer and William Stanley
Jr.
If, you have not noticed anything unusual, I will make a couple of sketches to clarify the
disposition of electromagnetic induction and mutual induction.
Mutual induction, this is broadcast energy between two

guides. The inter-turn counter-EMF can also be attributed to the mutual induction system. To put
it simply, two conductors are side by side in a system of turns, provided that a current flows in
one, it is excited in the other,
also current the opposite currents. Effect
transformations nothing amazing. For amplification
mutual induction, these turns are planted on the core. This is where the inconsistencies begin. A
magnetic dipole does not move in a circle, but only polarizes, even in a ring. Only a dipole can
rotate, but how,
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

this happens in a transformer with P - shaped core, where the windings are on different cores.
You have seen the left figure several times, from the school bench, the yellow dotted
line indicates the direction of the flow in a circle. In the two pictures on the right, I have depicted
a real picture. The polarization of the core is a dipole, and the fluxes are directed in both cores in
the same direction.
The main flow is external, located inside the conventional core ring, and penetrates only
1/3 of the turn of the secondary winding. In turn, 1/3 of the turn secondary housing ", Forms an
EMF with a current in the whole loop, which forms a magnetic flux. The generated magnetic flux
coincides with the flux of the core. Yes exactly
matches. Right hand rule for solenoid. How, it is not surprising, but the transformer is in
operation, trying to align the magnetic flux, namely the magnetic double dipole, in the core " secondary
housing "Larger than in the core" primary ", Since the flow from" primary "And" secondary housing "Are
summed up in it." The more current will be in the secondary winding, the more it will be in the
primary, the system will strive for equilibrium. At the exit from the transformer, we get only what
the Faraday induction can give, in its pure form. Do not forget that the efficiency is low, since
only 1/3 of the coil length is "irradiated" by the magnetic flux.
because
the mechanism proposed in modern transformers is used William
Stanley,
" primary "Winds closer to the core, and" secondary housing »On
top of it, and there is no point in shielding them, since this is done
for complete mutual induction along the electric field. Wherein
not skew in magnetic field
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page ten of 58
core. There is another option, electrodynamics and electromechanics of the process, but this is
not the topic of the manual, this is transformation.
If the Secondary winding P- shaped, place an electric field in the shield, (we shield the
core, from the secondary coil) current
in secondary coil noticeably will lose opportunities
act on the core. In this case, the transmission efficiency will fall, but this is at first glance. It all
depends on the area of "irradiation" of the conductor, and this method can also be called,
without feedback. In this case, we can only rely on the frequency and strength of the magnetic
flux in the core, which forms the primary winding. In this case, with an increase in the load in the
circuit " secondary housing »Transformer, voltage drop and current rise will occur. The magnetic
flux will be maximum in the body of the magnetic circuit, and only "tears" on the surface.
Why am I describing all this, all this has a direct bearing on if the core receives the
excitation of a magnetic flux from the magnetic induction of the permanent magnet of the rotor,
only the generated flux from the coil will be opposed to the flux in the core from the permanent
magnet. Well, how is the current generated in classic synchronous generators. Why is this
particular combination of wire laying in grooves commercially attractive?
Let's remember the law electromagnetic induction Faraday. For any circuit, the induced
electromotive force (EMF) is equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux passing through
this circuit, taken with a minus sign, or in other words, the generated EMF is proportional to the
rate of change of the magnetic flux. True, he does not say anything. I will say more, for a brief
and general understanding, you need to make a drawing for yourself: right hand rule:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page eleven of 58
The EMF direction is determined by the right hand rule:
the lines of force enter the palm, the bent thumb in the direction of movement, 4 fingers
will indicate the direction of the EMF. What is the electromotive force (EMF), which is
measured in Volts. Volts characterize electrical voltage. Electric voltage between points A and B
of an electric circuit or an electric field is a physical quantity, the value of which is equal to the
work of an effective electric field (including external fields) performed when a single test electric
charge is transferred from point A to point B.
Regarding charge transfer, we will not dispute or confirm. Just remember the picture on page 8,
which shows a snapshot of a section of a conductor with current. That is, EMF is a field structure
around a conductor between points A and B. Electric tension in the form of a spiral. Depending
on the rotation of the spiral, we have at the points at the ends
conductor a plus and minus, differences potentials

electric field E, which has a unit of measurement Volts. The SI system. Chas higher speed υ ( m /
s) conductor movement L ( a) in meters, and magnetic flux IN( T), relative to each other, per unit
of time. The formula for determining the EMF on the conductor section is as follows.
E EMF ( U) = B * υ * L (a)
And where is our current, and in general, what is this and in what form. There are
several interpretations of the concept of electric current. The definition adopted in the school
textbook that electric current is the movement of particles that have a charge due to the action of
an electric field on them. Particles are: protons, holes, electrons, ions. In the electrical literature
of higher educational institutions, it is written that an electric current is the rate at which a charge
changes over time. Accepted negative charge of electrons, positive for protons and neutral for
neutrons. The question is what particles and how they move, speed, etc.
Let's try a little

it is unconventional to imagine the nature of the current. In our conductor, an EMF appeared in
the form of a spiral and a potential difference. If we close the ends of the conductor through a
piece of wire, according to the principle of the ninth law of the universe, the Law of Equilibrium. Only
when equilibrium is achieved, when that center is found where movement
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

reaches such speed that it becomes equal to rest, all aspects of the single law can be
synthesized and completed.
But when the field strength strives for equilibrium, the conductor of the circuit with all the
elements will resist. Already putting my structure out of balance. There is an opposition to the
ring of electric field strength with a potential difference. Ring
energy Wednesday forms his energy

component, named Electric Shock. Have Wednesday.
The conductor has its own factor of resistance to this change, named after Dr. Ohm, and
measured in Ohms. This current spiral
will be by direction potentials opposite
the direction of the spiral of tension. That is, on the action of balancing the potential difference of
the electric field, the medium of the conductor creates a reaction, which is reflected in the power
component of the electric current with current. The fact that the current moves inside the
conductor in a spiral as opposed to the spiral of tension can be confirmed by such a
phenomenon as the current density in the conductor
Help wikipedia.org:
Surface effect, skin effect - the effect of decreasing the amplitude of electromagnetic
waves as they penetrate deep into the conducting medium. As a result of this effect, for
example, an alternating current of high frequency, when flowing through a conductor, is not
distributed evenly over the section, but mainly in the surface layer.
The bulk current density is maximum at the surface of the conductor. With distance
from the surface, it decreases exponentially and at a depth
delta ∆ getting smaller in e time. This depth is called the thickness
of the skin layer and, based on the above, is equal to:
Obviously, for sufficiently large

At the omega frequency, the thickness of the skin layer can be very small. It also follows from the
exponential decrease in the current density that practically all of the current is concentrated in a
layer several ∆ ( delta), for example, a decrease in the current density by a factor of 100 occurs at a
depth of ≈ 4.6 ∆, if the total thickness of the conductor is many times the thickness of the skin layer.
As an example, we give the dependence of the skin depth on the frequency for a copper conductor:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page thirteen of 58
To calculate the thickness of the skin layer in metal ( approximately ) can
use the following empirical formulas:
Here: ε 0 = 8.85419 ⋅ 10-12 F / m - electrical constant, ρ -

resistivity, c - the speed of light, μ m - relative
magnetic permeability (close to unity for para- and diamagnets -
copper, silver, etc., f is the frequency, ɷ = 2π * f ...
A little more about the skin effect from various sources from practitioners:
Skin thickness is the amount by which the current density decreases exponentially with
distance from the surface of the conductor. Those. if it is 0.5 mm, this does not mean that after
0.5 mm pl. current is zero, it is only 2.71 times less than the value on the surface. Therefore, a
thicker wire is used.
Losses for a different-polar rectangular current shape at an optimal thickness have the
same character as for a unipolar pulse. But the optimal thickness is slightly less (it is 1.54 skin
depth), and the drag coefficient is higher. This can be understood as the beneficial effect of the
DC component in the pulse, which has lower losses than the equivalent AC current.
It turns out that it is more profitable to use a unipolar current and a thicker conductor,
however, magnetization appears in the core, and these are additional eddy current losses in the
gap, what will be the advantage given these losses?
It is especially advantageous to use a triangular current waveform, since at

T o = 0 and t r = T / 2 skin effect disappears miraculously, i.e. in the inductor with a
symmetric-triangular shape of the current, the skin effect should not be
generally.
Next, we will analyze how the current value in the current-carrying circuit is calculated.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ohm's law - an empirical physical law that determines the electromotive
connection strength source ( or electric
voltage) with the strength of the current flowing in the conductor and the resistance of the
conductor.
The strict formulation of Ohm's law for a section of a circuit is written as follows: the current in the
circuit is directly proportional to the voltage in its section and inversely proportional to the resistance of this
section.
The Ohm's law formula for a chain section is written as follows:
I=U/R
Where:
I - current strength in the conductor [ AND]; U - electrical voltage (potential

difference) [ IN]; R - electrical resistance of the conductor [ Ohm].
Ohm's law for a complete circuit - the current in the circuit is proportional to the EMF
acting in the circuit and is inversely proportional to the sum of the resistances of the circuit and
the internal resistance of the source.
I (A) = EMF / (R + r)
How to apply to our case is very simple. We need to determine the component of the
voltage potential difference in the circuit. Suppose we have a voltage difference of 20 V on the A
– B segment, the battery voltage = 13.5 V, the difference will be 6.5 V. This is an imbalance in
the tensions. Resistance of section A-B = 0.9 Ohm, internal
resistance Battery = 0.02 Ohm, resistance

connecting wires in the loop = 0.3 ohm. Total resistance
will be R sum = 0.9 + 0.02 + 0.3 = 1.22 Ohm. Let's calculate the current in the circuit
I ( A) = 6.5 V / 1.22 Ohm = 5.3 Ampere
The formula for calculating the current in a circuit with a generator winding and a battery will
take the form:
I ( A) = EMF gen. - U bat. / R sum = R [ L (a + b + c)] + r bat.

We will consider all the wisdom of how to handle this further. The main thing is how to
ensure the magnetic flux and maximum EMF on the site. The question arises, where is this
indicator the most powerful. There is no need to argue here. At the epicenter of the pole, in the
body of the core. It is enough to look at the laying of wires in modern synchronous generators,
for example, single-phase.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

If you look at the length of the active conductor L ( a) and
inactive L ( b) in the winding of one phase of the generator, we can visually estimate that the
length of the inactive is several times greater than the active length. In which the EMF is
indicated. The only problem with this design is the induction braking of the rotor in the stator, as
a result of which a hefty input torque is required. I would like to note that the current in the
generator winding amplifies the field in the stator. Only this happens due to the superposition of
the field from the rotor and the field from the winding with an induction current. According to the
rule of action-reaction, the rotor and stator fields have the opposite motion vector, as a result we
have braking. The greater the induction current in the load, the greater the action-reaction during
rotation.
Why it is more effective, it is very simple that the value of B of the magnetic induction in
the body of the core is the greatest. Those lines of magnetic flux of magnetic induction, which on
the surface already lose their power by half, and with distance practically lose their potential, to
induce EMF. What do we need to do? We need to try as much as possible to combine the flow
and the conductor and remove the dependence on the rotor.
In fact, the stator core with the motor coils will become an active shield from the rotor
magnet. at the same time, it will magnetize itself and emit a flux, but everything is in order.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

MOTOR with maximum energy recovery for rotation!
As stated, the motor is of axial type with two hemispherical cores, and complex bifilar
winding. The rotor of the motor is common with the generator, and has four pluses, two north
and two south. In the first version, the magnets alternate after one. I also added another
generator winding [Generator Winding - GW] to the design, which is made frame and is placed
along the web of the core on the reverse side of the rotor. General view in the figure.
And so, if you noticed, we have three windings, two bifilar threads around the edge of
the core along the plane, in fact, a conditional quadrifilar [ Quadrifilar Winding- QW] and the third
GRW winding, calculation and packing procedure, which will be specified later.
Let's analyze the first - QW winding:

***************************************
So far, nothing is clear, but we recall the bifilar winding scheme, from a full H - bridge,
which I indicated in the top description of the devices, project. We look at this diagram:
It is simpler and the principle itself has been worked out on more than one device with
one winding thread. I absolutely agree with you, but we are making a self-propelled device. We
need maximum recuperation. I hope that there is no need to explain the peculiarity of the
operation of this circuit, from the classic H-bridge, but I will stop. The figure below shows a
classic bridge and bifilar distributed winding.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The current path is shown in different colors when the flow is excited in the coil. In the
first version, the current moves through the coil along one wire and has all the delights of
switching switching and changing the current flow in the wire. And what has the second option.
The second option has a transformer system with equal parameters of the primary and
secondary windings. We exclude contradictions on self-induction, this time. Due to the work of
one wire as the primary
pathogen, and second as secondary front

the formation of the pole will be steeper than with a single wire. The reason is the leveling of
reactance. True, there are drawbacks, the winding density and the way out of secondary housing »As
a transformer will not have the full effect. The reason is losses and voltage levels. In theory, a 1:
1 transformer should work as it were. But in fact, in any transformer ( and this is, in fact, a
transformer converter) there are losses and if the voltage of the supply circuit is 12V, then the
output “ secondary housing ”, There will be a maximum of 11.5 V. This means that the secondary
current will be locked. Only the burst at the beginning of the pulse will have an output, since its
voltage will be higher than the source. Or, when the primary circuit current is turned off,
utilization will also occur, while divided by two, since both threads will take part in this, but there
are moments.
I have been dealing with this issue for a long time, the solution lies in the elementary
physics of the process. You need to change the parameters " secondary housing " towards " primary
", I.e. we need two, one-act converters, to blind together, "jack". I got this schematic diagram.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page eighteen of 58
The idea is the following, consider using one half of the diagram as an example. We
have a classic one-sided ( single-cycle) an excitation circuit with a coil section (A-B), and if we
remove the coil thread (C-A), we get the principle of a pulse motor by John Bedini:
Only I am her a little modernized by adding additional " inductance ”, Capacitor and
optimized diode decoupling. In this
modernization there is two way execution:
regenerative and regenerative with a current amplifier, while everything is within the limits of
traditional physics, without anomalies. We will dwell on this later.
If you look at the complete scheme of Bedini, from his patent US

# 6392370 from May 21, 2002 [Motor - Generator], where in the description he positions the
efficiency of the COP system 98% more or less, depending on the combination and parameters
of the device.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

In the diagram, we see one motor thread with self-induction reset, through a diode
bridge, which I have already upgraded. And the second is the secondary circuit, which directs
the induction energy into the second buffer storage. In the patent itself there is another point that
is drawn, but not explained, the secondary windings are made by two coils, on one of the circuits
with positioning of the structure. These coils are most likely made to work with a magnetic field,
and may very well be with a magnetic shield, modeled on the Nikola Tesla transformer. It turns
out that almost all seekers and engineers with specialized education missed this patent as not
understood, while Bedini himself was nowhere and never, a prototype,
executed by this patent, open not

demonstrated. His, " charger-twist "Nothing more than a PR move, very skillfully untwisted, this is
my conviction, what he wanted to show is conceived in a larger, not in an episode, but in a
system. Unfortunately, the searchers do not go beyond the episode. The man in the street will
always lead to simplicity, which has been demonstrated practically, two decades ago. Why he
did it, we can only guess. Considering the tragic fate of his friend Watson, Bedini had something
to fear.
**************************
The first in one winding of the bifilar will be the induction from the field according to all the
rules of electrodynamics and electromechanics. And in the second thread there will be mutual
induction also according to all the rules. In this case, the tone will be set by the capacitor having a
lower charge. For this we
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

pay attention when we calculate the parameters of the pulse and components.
Now and so why make a start. We poke our finger into the sky. Source voltage, and
Ohm's law. We are nowhere without Om's grandfather.
We take as a basis the voltage of a direct current source of 12 volts (real operating
voltage 13.75 volts, full charge 14.4 volts).
We will count on 13.5 volts.

The wire is applicable lacquered, copper 0.5 mm in diameter:
In the table we find variants of wires close in parameters. We choose two options for
the main thread and for the additional, jack-forming history of the winding.
*****************************************
As you can see, the excitation current has risen, and the recuperation power output
remains, but at the same time the secondary circuit current has dropped, and the voltage has
noticeably increased, which is more preferable for the recuperation circuit, I will clarify further
why. We have increased the pulse current of the primary circuit, in prohibitive parameters. For
section 0.1885 mm 2, the current of 11 amperes will be prohibitive based on the proportion
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

current density 1-2 A / per mm 2. And there will also be an impressive 4 wires around the core,
0.49 mm in diameter, in a bundle of 89 turns. We will have to increase the cross-section of the
wire in order to remove the overheating of the wire, as well as the thickness of the composite
core, so that everything fits.
I made these calculations as indicative. Why is the second option preferable? We have
a direct current source, for example - a 12 Volt battery (13.75 V). Two capacitors C1 and C2 are
always in the mode of receiving a charge, from a given source, through diodes D1, D5. This
means that if one of the capacitors drops its voltage level below the battery voltage level
13.75 volts, the process of charging the capacitor immediately begins. What is the charge of a
capacitor from a battery, is the equalization of their charge by voltage, i.e. the capacitor voltage
increases, and the battery drops, and when they are equal, the current will stop (conditionally, of
course, we do not take into account leaks, etc.)
Between the excitation pulses of the main windings, there is a mandatory pause. At the
moment of the beginning of the pause between switching, the capacitor that was charged will be
charged by
stress, higher stresses source, So as
the mutual induction of the pulse will recharge the capacitor to a higher level,
than at source. Hence, resistance given
the capacitor will be larger.
As a result, the entire discharge energy of the core will be transferred to the capacitor,
which induced the pulse. Taking into account that the core will be under the influence of the rotor
magnetic field, the aspiration to the balance register, this impulse will also be decent.
As a result, the participation of the source, as such, may not be required. This is how
the circuit works. To make the system work, according to the plan, everything needs to be
carefully calculated, the capacitance of the buffer capacitors, the capacitance of the coil charge
and combinations, the strength of the rotor magnetic flux, time intervals, resistances of sections
and complete circuits in various switching registers must be coordinated. This is a painstaking
job of a design engineer.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I will immediately anticipate the Question: “But what, counter- EMF, because the secondary field
windings, must neutralize magnetic field,
created by the primary winding? " At one time I asked myself the same question. And I got my
vision of this issue. And so in order: What fields are involved in the process:
one) Electric field of the solenoid “The force field, the wires which are coiled into a coil,
forms a field in the form of a torus, with pronounced zones of explosion [expansion] and
implosion [suction], if we wind such coils in series with turns in the form of a cylinder, we get the
well-known field, but it turns into category electromagnetic with poles of Explosion and
Implosion. This field interacts with other electric and magnetic fields. Very well demonstrates the
features of this field, two Helmholtz rings. This field is a pump that pumps "space" through its
middle. From one it sucks in, from the other it pushes out. It is based on an electric spiral field
around the conductor. It is this that is the force that forms the force of Ampere. And this Ampere
force, rolled into a coil, forms an electromagnetic torus.
If we insert an iron
core, then another participant appears.
2) A magnetic field, it is the reaction of the body of the magnetically conductive
material to the Ampere force. You know how the official scientific community views it. My version
is different. In the body of a magnetically conducting material, a magnetic dipole arises. It has
two zones in the structure: Explosion and Implosion, with the only difference all the lines of force
of the magnetic dipole are closed from one core of the pole to another and have one polarity, in
the body and outside.
As a result, the directions of the flows of the coil and the core inside the core body are
opposite, and outside they coincide. This is the cause of eddy currents. This is my assumption
some physicists called " Rakarsky's paradox ”, Since there is no understanding of where the
stream goes and where it comes out from. They do not operate with space in multiple
dimensions. I did not set myself a goal to prove or disprove, but these fields are electric (around
the conductor), the field of the solenoid is a structure of turns of a wire with current and the
magnetic field are different in nature.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This is a separate topic and we will definitely consider it on the project site. Next, let's
look at how mutual induction between wires works. Let's consider the simplest drawing.
Two circuits, in which there is a section where parallel conductors are found (it does not
matter along the length of the conductor or in bundles like in a transformer, bifilar, etc.) When
the first circuit is connected to a direct current source for a short period of time, the conductor is
polarized and an electrical field around the conductor. Tension does not "flow" anywhere, it
changes its tension. If the circuit is closed, "current" begins to move in its body. This is the effect
of action-reaction. In our case, the battery has a galvanic charge (non-equilibrium) of the
polarized electrolyte, and the current pulse through the conductor is the ability of the charge to
balance. When the potential difference is equal, there will be ZERO.
At the moment of the current pulse, it “ flows »In the area where another wire is located
nearby, in which, according to the law of action of counteraction, the current begins to move,
opposite to the movement of the first circuit.
Condition, second
the contour must also be closed,
in our case
circuit closes not
charged capacitor, and for the secondary

circuit this is a load, in mind
his minimum
resistance to current at the beginning, and an
increase during charging.
Look carefully that in the area of parallel placement of conductors, the polarity of the
electric field sets the first circuit, and in the second the polarity does not change. With the only
difference, in the field zone, the currents vectors in the conductors are directed oppositely. Here
the most interesting thing is that the current in the secondary circuit, in such a disposition,
cannot form
magnetic or electromagnetic flow.
With respect to the strength of the electric field, they have a different direction.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

It will look like this on the graph. But this is only
for
coils since, no offset
phases current not
exists. Everything read correctly

algorithm
actions. We look at the drawing again
from contours, and
put everything in its place. And so we

have one field, two
conductor, one
field strength, one conductor is the load for the battery. He is a consumer. And the second
conductor is a source, and its direction of current occurs according to all the rules of
electrodynamics. The primary in this pair is the master circuit with a current source. It follows
that the electromagnetic field will create a primary thread with current. And the secondary is in
an adequate state, called reactive energy in electrodynamics. Only for reactive energy the
source is the magnetic field. And this is an axiom. Try a core that is simply applied to the rest of
the transformer core and is quietly removed when turned off, tear off when it is running. Energy
of mutual induction and reactive energy of twin brothers. Thus, the paired winding and magnetic
flux creates and returns some of the energy back to the system, true to the adjacent buffer
storage. Classical H-bridge it won't do it, is it not designed for that?
Even more, the motors of Joe Flynn and Kornilov work according to this algorithm.
Everyone is shown “ pieces of iron ", But, no one, never does not look into the electrical circuit ,
whether there are magnets there or not. We have one more recuperation winding with an infinity
sign
This is generally the purest classic. All modern generators use this principle. We have
both cores with identical polarity. Therefore, the current in the conductor located on the plane of
the pole of the cores will have a single vector. Therefore, we connect with an eight. Recess in
the core to increase
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

electromagnetic induction, ideally this tab should be laid in the core body, but we will consider
this position in the second option. Connection for pickup as a normal phase through a diode
bridge and a voltage regulator, or a diode-thyristor bridge with a voltage regulator.
Single phase generator, nothing new. Moreover, I propose to use a controlled

thyristor-diode bridge for rectification and charging control. Simplicity and minimum of details. It
has been worked out on so many devices, even on cars, during the modernization of the
generator, when the "smart guys" put a rotor with permanent magnets instead of an excited
rotor. In the scheme, the regulator is a standard regulator from the car. 14.4V
or 27 volts ( for a 27 volt circuit, an additional transistor is needed, with a strapping), but still the
circuit is the simplest, " People's Charge Controller ". The regulator can be done by yourself on
the logic of nothing complicated.
We select thyristors according to the parameters of work, with a margin of voltage and
current. Power diodes, preferably dual Schottky diodes. These diodes have the ability to install
on radiators and an acceptable voltage drop. Diodes
D2, D4 ordinary, type 1N4007. Resistors R1R3 330 ohm / 0.5 watt. The circuit without a
connected battery will not work, since its work is arranged, on the principle of controlling the
battery voltage, from it, it takes energy for its work.
I try to present the simplest working scheme. With a motor, such simplicity will not work,
but nevertheless, consider the simplest option in my opinion.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

********************************
First option:
Rotor position detection design
Automatically, the decision is made that the shaft is rigidly fastened to the rotor body,
must have two support bearings. If the axle is vertical, mounting can only be done in the bottom
panel with several bearings in a row. In this case, we need a frame panel, a motor panel, a
generator panel, and a panel for electronics.
*************
The motor will come out very high-speed, therefore, the shaft does not need to be made
flimsy, it is better with a margin of safety. In the dashboard, provide a hole for a shaft with a
sleeve, like a rolling bearing, better even made of ceramic.
To wind the coils of the motor, you will need to make a special frame, according to the
size and thickness of the planned winding
* 1 Side panels - 2 pcs.

* 2 Axial reinforcement insert - 1 piece
* 3 Sleeve (by number of holes)
* 4 Bolt (by number of holes)
* 5 Washers (according to the number of holes x2)
* 6 Nut
The winding must be carried out according to the technology that is used when winding
the coils of axial-type wind generators. But the cores need to be made first, this is one of the
operations that requires specific skills and devices. First, the core cannot be altered. And you
can't grind it into powder. Like chipped ceramic ferrite. Secondly, the proportion turns out to be
very thickly grated and very quickly setting.
Third, there is very little time for the material to be displayed. This
operation also will require special
devices. Collapsible form. It needs to be done in three parts.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reasons - FROM, and two face-forming shapes - A, B. The thickness of the edges must
correspond to the thickness of the core. It is practical to make it from plywood, Elements AND and
IN, to the base FROM,
fastened with cuts. First, cover the bottom with a film in several layers. The edges inside the
mold are also covered with foil, then fasten themselves with cuts into the previously prepared
holes in the elements A, B. After that, in a comfortable and sturdy dish, specially made with a
spatula, preferably made of oak, knead the composite mortar, mixing it well. Attention, it will
have a thick grated, fast-setting consistency. Without stopping in time, with effort distribute it
over the area of the core in the form, and compact it with a special thick spatula. In Canada, a
finder made a special press, but the molds were small and cylindrical. Leave to dry. This is one
of the time consuming operations.
It is easier to make the built-in coil structure in the motor panel. First, we wind the coils,
in fact we cut out the cells for the coils.
We insert the windings into the cells. We fill the middle, for example, with a material that
does not absorb epoxy filler and can be easily removed. Pour the inserted windings with epoxy
filler, after drying, remove the material and "press in" a composite material based on 70% iron
oxide powder and 30% epoxy resin.
Provide output ends wires in side

opposite to the rotor.
The rotor is the most important structural element. If you have the opportunity to order
its production from professionals, choose exactly - order.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

If you still decide to do it yourself, you will need
many agreed accurate operations and
the corresponding devices. If a you will, make

fixing pads, then cut, process will need to be folded together. You will have to drill holes for
round magnets, since it is almost impossible to make shaped holes manually without special
equipment.
You just need to make a special " derzhak ", See the picture
Having previously marked the workpiece, it must be fixed on an axis, which makes it
possible to rotate the part. Provide two points for fixing the part. Foundation "d yerzhak ", Will
need to be fixed on the drill bed, so that the part can turn to describe the exact circle with the"
drill "around the axis of the part ( shown in the figure with a dashed red line).
All holes in the rotor part must be symmetrical to the axis and have a pair. After
assembling the rotor, balancing must be done.
Work order:
- Calculations and execution of large-scale drawings on paper;
- Collection of equipment materials and manufacture of a Rotor with balancing, a Shaft
with a system for fastening to panels and fixing a rotary system in which a shaft with a rotor is
attached, making panels as a base, manufacturing a disc for determining the position of a
rotor;
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

- Making cores for coils, winding coils and fixing cores and coils on the panel.
Manufacturing of a control disk and a system for fixing optocouplers.
- Making an electrical circuit for the test. This operation can be done previously on the
breadboard.
- Assembly of the structure, calibration of the coil connections. Assembling the circuit.
- Test run of the motor, determination of the maximum speed, determination of defects,
etc.
- Elimination of defects, etc.

- Winding of the regenerative generator winding (infinity). You need to find out the
length of the winding, make "puzzles", wind the estimated number of turns. It should be noted
here that the calculation is close to the method for calculating the winding of a conventional
single-phase synchronous generator. This winding is the first time ... I can say one thing, it can
happen that this winding will become the main generator.
Checking the operation of the generator winding (recuperation). Manufacturing of a

controlled thyristor-diode bridge with adjustable output voltage for a battery.
Making a core for a three-phase generator (with a core, the technology is amorphous
the same as for the motor cores).
Coil winding with screens. Mounting on the connection panel. calibration
Checking work with the installation in a regular place of the structure. Fitting the
winding data to the specified ratings.
Manufacturing of a semiconductor controlled bridge with voltage regulation.
Assembly products in finished device. Registration

operational documentation.
Calculation and manufacture of stator panels of the motor-generator.
The first classic motor,

axial type, traditionally
are made with several coils starting from six pole designs.
Photo example
eight
pole rotor axial
motor. Traditionally, axial
___________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy Sys

constructions do not use motors, coil without
cores. This way the switching speed is achieved,
focused electromagnetic pole, in a coil.
We will not go into details. We need to get an acceptable methodology for calculating
our structure. We will slightly change the technology in order to provide a logical and low-cost,
do it yourself.
The very first thing, we need to decide on the dimensions. The saturation of our core
should not cross the boundary when the rise or fall of the magnetic field (saturation) stops in it.
The myth that an open core is difficult to drive into saturation is only a myth. A closed core "flies"
into saturation faster, but we should not flatter ourselves when working with an open coil core.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I prepared matrix major sizes, which us
will be needed.
Data sizes.
Suitable for both four
pole rotor and for a rotor with two poles.
Introduce
and counting on
the following parameters:
D [ mm] Full
diameter rotor
( counting) R [ mm]
Full radius rotor
( enter)
a [ mm] Distance from
the center of the axis to the magnetic belt
( we enter) b [ mm]
Magnetic belt distance ( counting) c [ mm] Distance
protective rim of the rotor ( we enter) h [ mm] Height (thickness) of the stator core ( enter,
correct) s [ mm] The distance between the windings of the two coils ( counting) g [ mm] The
distance between the cores of the two coils ( counting)
Core size:
[one] [ mm] Long lateral core height ( enter)
[2] [ mm] Core width [top and bottom] ( enter)
[3] [ mm] Length to bevel (width) ( counting)
[four] [ mm] the first side of the bevel ( counting)
[five] [ mm] the second side of the bevel ( we calculate) = ( 1/3 [1]) [6] [ mm] Bevel
length ( counting)
What we need to know for the calculations. It's like choosing a wire. We will be using
copper wire in varnish. It has parameters.
The two main parameters are diameter, copper and lacquered insulation. This is for
sizing calculations. To calculate electrical indicators, we need to know its cross section,
measured per square millimeter. We need this to calculate the permissible current that the
conductor will withstand. In order not to go into the jungle, we will use a primitive calculation. But
if in essence, for a beginner, this is a real jungle, for example:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

For a single copper wire, approximately 10 A / sq. mm continuously (direct current). If
this wire is used to wind a transformer, then everything changes. For transformers there is a
simplified empirical formula d (mm) = 0.8 *
I (A). Generally for
transformers, the current density parameter is used: for powerful 2-2.5 A / sq. mm, for low power
up to 5 A / sq. mm.
It is necessary to calculate the cross-sectional area of the secondary winding
according to the formula S = π r * r, as a rule, in practice, it is assumed that one square
millimeter passes a current of 10A through itself, [ A = 10A * S section. ( mm 2)].
A simplified averaged formula for calculating the required section of the winding wire: S
sec. ( mm 2) = A / 3.85 where: A -
rated load current S - wire cross-sectional area in mm. sq. it follows that: A = S sec. (mm 2) * 3.85
There are also special tables in the numerous literature.
Let's check:
one) 0.196 mm2 * 3.85 = 0.7546A; 10A *
2) 0.196 mm2 = 1.96A; 5A * 0.196 mm2
3) = 0.98A;
four) 2.5A * 0.196 mm2 = 0.49A
As you can see, all the results do not match the data in the table. We will have to
proceed from logic. And so, we will argue. We have a dependence that logically suggests itself,
the size of the current in a wire of the same cross-section for direct current and alternating
current is different
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

dramatically. In this case, the higher the frequency of the alternating current and the power, the
lower the current that is included in the calculation for passing through the wire. The question is
why? Which is very simple, the current changes direction. This does not mean that the
cross-section at a given switching frequency will not stand it, just the size of the current will be
proportional to the switching capabilities from zero, in both directions. But we do not have a
change in the direction of the current in the vein. A separate core is responsible for the
corresponding direction of the current along the magnetic flux. Therefore, it is rational to
calculate the current dimension according to the formula for direct current: A = 10A * S section. ( mm
2) ...
Just change the base current to 9A, by default we will accept for the pulse current: A = 9A * S
section. ( mm 2) ...
It is possible to use, namely, a pair winding (bifilar), which solves the problem of
increasing the efficiency of work with current. At the same time, it is not commercially viable,
since doubles copper consumption.
Let's go: let's calculate the small desktop model. I entered into the calculation system a
minimum of parameters that need to be entered. The system will automatically calculate, but
manual participation is necessary because we must get the logic and the best option.
To begin with, we need to push off from something, we will make a two-polar rotor (one
pair of poles) on four magnets.
We fill in only those fields that are marked in blue, in the order indicated to the right of
the data entry cells. I specially calculated the available round magnets, which are structurally
similar to the analyzed model from the video. MG-Duo table
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

We enter the first data block, the actual basic dimensions of the device, taking into
account the selected magnet, which we use four:
The magnetic belt [b] in this case will be equal to the diameter of the magnet. The
distance from the center of the axis to the magnetic belt [a] will need to be calculated. We do this
by calculating the circumference of the middle line of the magnetic belt. We take the sum of
eight diameters of the magnet by a factor of 1.05.
Further, we do all the calculations, starting from
of this parameter.
Calculation of cores. The cores should be semicircular on the outside and straight on
the
side of the axis. But I propose to make a kind
trapezoid.
polygon. First, easier
wind and count. Parameter [3] is a factor that sets
the length [3] relative to the length [2]. If it is equal,
this coefficient will be equal to zero, then we get a
pure trapezoid, where the base is from the side of
the axis, and the upper edge of the trapezoid is
equal to 1/3 of the length of the base.
Can you change

principle on your own. Why did I choose this configuration? The reason lies in the versatility to
execute different variants of the project model.
Rectangle also
possible, but this will entail an increase in the length of the coil wire and
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

decrease in the ampere parameter of the coil. But as an option, you can use cutting a
transformer tape folded into a bar. Here's what comes out with the calculation.
The next stage is the calculation of the excitation parameters and the selection of the
wire. To begin with, we determine the voltage of the current source. Choosing a 12V battery.
The maximum charging voltage is 14.5V, the operating voltage is not lower than 13.75V.
Therefore, we make the calculation for a minimum operating voltage of 14 volts. We select the
maximum current of the excitation circuit 2 Amperes. We get the power consumption of 28
watts.
Us necessary calculate ohmic indicator

the resistance of the excitation thread (motor). We do this based on Ohm's Law: R = U / I = 14V /
2.0A = 7.0 Ohm ( the program does automatically).
Next, we determine the cross section of the copper current in the varnish. This is one of
the controversial points. There is a difference in the choice of wire size for DC and AC. We are
interested in the diameter for calculating the total section of the winding and adaptation in the
structural arrangement, we will use the section for the calculation and other factors. In fact, in
each thread of our complex winding, the direction of the current will not be attracted. Therefore,
once again we dwell on the formula, which we take as a basis:
A = 9.0 ( AND) * S ( mm 2) conductor cross-section [ wires]
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Should Mark, what we we operate concepts not
alternating, and pulse current. Therefore, there are two threads connected in series in the
secondary circuit, there will be a slightly unusual picture. At the moment of excitation of one of
the threads. By passing a current through it, a mutual induction current will be pulsed with the
neighboring one. And when you turn off
excitation, impulse
Self-induction, will smoothly develop into induction, additionally connecting an additional thread.
Further, when turned on, excitation
in neighboring thread, will change quality already in
mutual induction. In this case, the direction of the current will not be attracted in any of the veins.
Here's a solitaire game. About which is not accepted
narrate.
We choose a wire in varnish with a
diameter 0.56 mm, full
diameter 0.61 mm. Its section according to
table 0.247 , mm 2,
check by the formula:
3.14 * (0.56 2) / 4 = 0.24617 or 0.785 * 0.56 2 = 0.24617 Thus
way, we we can calculate maximum
current throughput: 9A * 0.246 mm2 = 2.21A, and based on the ohmic resistance data, the
excitation thread length:
6.87 Ohm * (1 / 0.071 m) = 96.76 meters
Bifilar two cores of 96.78 meters each, + additionally taking into account the bends, and
the increase in turns with distance from the base of the winding, it is enough to apply the
coefficient for bends and distance of 1.025. We divide all this into two equal halves for two
separate coils.
We calculate the additional thread in the same way. But we need to adjust its length
taking into account the following parameters, and here not everything is unambiguous as it was
intended. In my practice, this is the reason for the coil shape.
In the proposed table c, formulas have already been entered, we will enter the initial
data and get the necessary results for further calculation.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

We need to determine the maximum voltage " secondary housing ". This means that we
need to calculate the voltage of one turn and the total ampere of the excitation turn.
Voltage " secondary housing »Must be sufficient to charge the source with a maximum
voltage of 13.75V to 14.5V. Let's calculate, and we get 14.5V * 1.38 = 20.1V. Why did I set the
odds of 1.38 so high. Logically enough 25% overvoltage of 18 Volts. I believe that we have not a
direct current, but a pulsed one, and we need to guarantee the charge of an intermediate
storage device of the corresponding capacity up to the starting voltage. The thread will not pass
more current than the ohmic resistance of the circuit will allow. And if exceeded, it will only warm
up. Ideally, the mutual induction pulse compensates
fifty%.
Let's make a tablet with a primitive calculation, what can we expect from the mutual induction of
the impulse.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The impedance of the full circuit will be decisive, and with the total minimum internal
resistance of the receiving capacitor, the efficiency will be approximately 75% at maximum.
The source for receiving the charge must be in the appropriate direction. simultaneously
the current will not have the direction of charge and discharge. For this reason, we have
organized a free container for working with the secondary circuit, our "combination them.
JACKET "
The rest we get, already from the induction pulse. And here the calculation produces
unthinkable possibilities. The first time I just underestimated the possibilities. Trying to calculate.
After turning off the excitation, the magnetic induction of the core will dominate, let's calculate it
for our coil.
We can calculate the maximum EMF induction impulse. You must understand that the
impulse will be disposed of according to the right hand rule, in the circuit that we turned off. The
calculation shows cosmic numbers.
For example, we took two indicators of rotation speed 600 and 1000 rpm. The magnetic
induction was underestimated to 1.5 T. An unthinkable result for the length of the secondary
circuit conductor.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To maintain the current density in the core, we applied the calculation of the correction
resistance and its power. As a result, we have mathematically 1 and 1.9 kW of energy that we
simply have to disperse into space. I wonder what parameters the system demonstrated in the
video had. There was no bifilar, one lived with a reverse motion.
It turns out that the three-phase panel simply distracted the viewer's attention, and the
operator demonstrated the capabilities of this type of coil. Intuition did not disappoint me, and
the assumption that it was the winding coil that showed such bright indicators.
I think that for coils with the arrangement of the windings on the core in the form of a
rod, the magnetic induction index will differ from the indicator on the core in the form of a disk. It
is not difficult for us to calculate 88 turns of 2 amperes, one 10 mm, the other 100 mm.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Next, you need to imagine the winding zones that will be exposed to the magnetic flux.
The further away from
surface, core, the weaker the flux density.
As you can see, the coils have a traditional look. More wire coil. rather than a magnetic
induction receiver for EMF indication. We recall N. Tesla's transformers and where the master
placed the removable windings. Maybe they create the best electromagnetic force, it is also
important for generating torque. We calculate the strength of the electromagnet in newtons [ F ( N)]
according to the formula.
F = (nxi) 2 x M i x S / (2 xl 2 t)
Where:
n - Number of turns
i - Current strength
M i - Magnetic constant = four π x 10- 7;

S - Sectional area of the electromagnet
L t - The length of the gap between the solenoid and a piece of metal
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

As you can see, the disk has advantages. In principle, therefore, the electromagnet for
working with scrap metal has a disk shape.
The force for our core will be 4.67 Newtonian. Is it a lot or a little ... Let's compare with
the well-known formula. I want to note right away, since the comparison is conditional and
accuracy can only be desired here, but still interesting. We know that the classical basic formula
for calculating the torque is T ( Nm) = F ( N) * R ( m). It remains for us to clarify only the radius
vector, but the radius of the middle line of the magnetic belt in our calculation is 0.047 meters
and we have no choice but to use the data. T = 4.67 * 0.047 = 0.219 newtons per meter. I want
to note right away that this calculation does not reflect the rotation speed. Suppose that we have
a rotation speed n = 1000 rpm ( switching frequency will be approximately 17 Hz). We know the
excitation power P = 27W (0.027 kW) ( it is also not correct since it does not take into account
the switching impulse segments) Let's calculate the torque using traditional formulas, taking into
account rotation:
T = 30 * P / π * n = 30 * 27 W / 3.14 * 1000 rpm = 0.26 Nm

T = P * n / 60 = 0.027 kW * 1000 rpm / 60 = 0.45 Nm.
We got different results, oddly enough If
we let's do
dependence of power 0.027 kW and speed
rotation get
following graph:
All the same, these are conventions,
accurate data is more complex and multi-stage
payment. But
one thing is obvious and indisputable, for low
input power
mechanical convector is important
speed, rotation - revolutions.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Another moment, our torque, calculated using the classic formula, without taking into
account the rotation speed, coincided with the figure of 1200 rpm according to the traditional
formula. What rotor speed should we focus on in calculating the phase of the generator circuit. I
think 2000 rpm.
I think these indicators are enough to not wander in the dark. Let's take into account
that these indicators are for one coil, and we have two of them.
A reasonable question arises, is there enough excitation pulse energy to reverse the
magnetization of the coil core? First, at the moment the excitation thread is turned on, the core
has a secondary magnetic field. What it means is when the source of the field is external. The
coil winding for 14V calculation in the amount of 40 turns of 2 amperes will create a total ampere
turn equal to 80A. The strength of the electromagnetic field H ( A / m), according to the formula H
= I * w / L will be: 2A
* 40 turns / 0.01 meters of coil thickness = 8000 amperes per meter. The magnetic induction will
correspond to 0.010048 T [ one A / m = 1, 256 x 10 (-6) T]. In this case, what will be the magnetic
induction in the gap from the side of the generator phase wires depends on the core material.
Composition of the composite: 70% Fe 3 O four ( iron oxide ) in powder and 30% resin ( epoxy
adhesive or any other material capable of binding ferritic
powder into one piece), advantages: more magnetization
> , 1.5 Tesla, low magnetic memory. Let's take a little look at what the magnetic flux in the core is,
otherwise it comes out somehow awkwardly. I deliberately carried out the calculations as a
schoolboy who must make a mistake.
Magnetic constant μ0 = 4π x 10 (- 7) Gn / m is called

permeability of vacuum. The permeability of most materials is very close to μ0, as most
materials will be classified as paramagnetic or diamagnetic. But in ferromagnetic materials, the
permeability can be very
large and easy to characterize materials

relative
permeability
Magnetic Properties Table :
When ferro magnetic
materials used in applications
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

as an iron core solenoid, relative permeability gives you an idea of the kind of multiplication of
an applied magnetic field that can be achieved by the presence of a ferromagnetic core. Thus,
for a conventional iron core, an increase of about 200 times can be expected compared to the
magnetic field created by the current of an air core solenoid. This statement has exceptions and
limits, since you quickly reach the core saturation magnetization.
********************************
In order to understand how much and another formula ... B = 1/2 µ × µ0 × n ×

I (A) / L (m)
On the picture ( below) a diagram of a very simple thyristor controller is presented, in

which thyristors play the role of elements
rectifier bridge. Key, impulse
principle regulation
allows you to apply this scheme even
in generators, Where
absent regulating
winding excitement, and
magnetic flux is created

permanent magnets.
The winding coils can be delta connected
like
shown in the figure, and with a star depending on the required output voltage.
A circuit using a voltage regulation relay ( charging relay) from the car, we have already
considered it earlier, but the scheme is very relevant, and does not require complex and rare
elements, installed on my recommendation at a mini hydroelectric power station ...
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

As for a mini system, it is the most cost-effective and reliable solution. Everything is
good in moderation. Therefore, it is necessary to find the optimal solution, and not to chase
the maximum. I hope if anyone had doubts, this material dispelled them.
You have all the calculations and justifications for the implementation of the device. In
the material, I tried to simplify the electrical circuit as much as possible. If anyone has the ability
to do management. through software, for example, based on " Arduino ", Nobody will forbid you to
do this. The concept was conceived as a battery charger, in addition to solar panels or a wind
power generator, or simply for replacement. It is very difficult to deal with network management,
therefore trust the devices that have been performed by professionals and purchase a network
inverter with all the elements of protection and modes.
To complete, I want to go back to Nikola Tesla's device. There are a lot of riddles and
outright fables about this person. I was once interested in this note, which is at the end of the
page devoted to the developments of John Bedini, but unfortunately I did not understand it then.
AC-DC / DC-DC MOTOR-DYNAMO

http://www.fight-4-truth.com/Schematics.html
Nikola Tesla, a man and genius recognized by the financial elite around the world, already in 1890,
was able to tame the ethereal radiant electricity to the horror of his opponents. It transmitted energy by air and
ground waves to a building 26 miles away, where a simple energy receiver was tuned to the powerful pulsations
of the broadcasting radio.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

stations, illuminating high-beam lights and working instruments, the engines of which did not require wired
connections.
As early as the early 1890s, Tesla, the inventor of alternating current generation, turned his back on
the alternating current network as he discovered that the radiated DC electrical power with pulse durations of
less than 100 microseconds could not be measured without physiological harm to power transmissions, but
would penetrate all matter.
Tesla's apparatus also used the method of obtaining high potentials / high frequencies and high
currents, where there were two or three motor dynamos in the main ones. The main vehicle was a permanent
magnet AC motor with increased DC power output, to which he added more motor dynamos to raise the
frequency and pressure even higher.
The energy of the radiant aether is based on a very high "frequency" of direct current, which means a
series of extremely fast unidirectional pulses per second that Nikola Tesla produced with a group of his
developed
motor-dynamo-motors permanent current from two
switches, see the figure below. By the way, his first AC dynamo developed by him had two armature windings
90 versus 90 ° and slip rings on one shaft on each side of the armature.
The dynamo was designed for two commutators or slip rings with one winding for the motor input,
while the other winding on the same armature was the output of the dynamo in the same rotation. Does this
sound familiar? If you think about it for a second, you can very quickly explain why these motor generators are
still not in demand !!! The generator side of the engine was wound at 90-spaced intervals around the armature,
skipping all other slots that were used for the generator side. He must have used at least 36 slots in the
armature fittings. The closer the switch segments or the larger the number of segments, the shorter the pulse
duration.
How about a generator with a field ring of 384 pole lugs and a disc armature with coils wound in a
single layer, which is connected in various ways according to the requirements, providing sinusoidal currents
from 10,000 to 20,000 cycles per second with an output power of 10 kW at which Tesla was working in his first
demonstrations of high frequency phenomena in front of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers at
Columbia College, May 20, 1891.
Tesla also used AC slip rings on the generator side to convert DC to AC for high frequency
applications.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

How the described N. Tesla motor dynamo was arranged only now, when the RAGEN
system was developed. And before that, I looked at this type of machine like everyone else -
stereotyped. Looking at the picture, you immediately look for an analogy in modern devices, and
the first thing that is recognized
this is: Umformer ( German Umformer, Electromachine
converter) - an electric machine for converting a current of one frequency into a current of
another frequency.
For instance:
• conversion of direct electric current into alternating current, as a rule, of a higher voltage;
• power transmission between power grids of different frequencies (50 and 60 Hz); obtaining
• direct current from alternating current for special cases (power supply of welding equipment).
Most often it is an electric motor connected by a shaft to a generator. The design also
includes additional devices to stabilize the output voltage and frequency.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

There are also known umformers with a single rotor, in which the windings of different
kinds of current are disconnected. DC windings are output to the collector, and AC - to slip rings.
There are also machines with common windings for all sorts of
current.
At the time of N. Tesla, and almost to the present day, such converters were used and
are applied in various networks, for transformation, stabilization, etc.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

There is another interesting design by Robert Alexander ...
In October 1975, California-based inventor Robert Alexander unveiled an improved drivetrain for a
car. According to the inventor, this electric drive was supposed to save car owners from the need to use burned
fuel, from unnecessary noise, and from the need for constant recharging of batteries in the near future.
The experts who arrived at the demonstration were greatly puzzled, because it seemed that energy
comes from "nothing". However, the car drove easily without fuel at 36 miles per hour. To the doubts of experts,
the inventor replied that the car drives, and she doesn't care about their arguments. Initial power was provided
by a converted 7/8 horsepower electric motor.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The motor has been redesigned to output 12 volts, otherwise the power output would be too much.
Robert's sons and his partner
James Smith per 45 days remade car, so that
Demonstrate the ability to drive without fuel and without pollution.
The press was invited to the demonstration, and later ( when patent US3913004 was already received )
One of the journalists was told the details of the project: the rotation of the electric motor starts from the battery,
the hydraulic and air systems of the car are activated, and the battery has time to be recharged from the
generator. Alexander spent only $ 500 on this rework.
Alexander and Smith themselves were not able to fully explain how this energy is obtained from
"nothing", nevertheless, they noted that people have long been able to do much more than they know and
understand, and go far to find examples no need - just look at this car that drives. The inventors called the
demonstrated phenomenon "Super Power" because it uses as many as three types of power to achieve this
goal.
Motor generator
The design is based on a transformer (converting device), which is at the same time a generator rotor
(crossed by a magnetic flux). The AC output is the result of two electromagnetic actions. Recall that the rate of
change of acceleration - the third derivative of the coordinate - is a jerk.
The rotor is a transformer core, and has a group of paired windings. Each section of the rotor has two
windings, one of which works as the primary winding of the transformer and as a motor winding, and the other
as the secondary winding of the transformer and as a generator winding. In this case, only permanent magnets
are located on the stator.
The generator uses well-known technologies of control and interaction with a magnetic field.
Transformable and generated
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page fifty of 58
the powers are synchronously combined, which leads to an increase in the output power.
The primary windings contain fewer turns than the secondary windings, in which, when the magnetic
field lines are crossed, a larger EMF is induced than that of the direct current source (which is the battery). The
stator magnetic field crosses the rotor, and motivates it to move, while generating energy in the secondary
windings.
The alternating current output in the secondary windings is inherently a synchronized function of the
transformed energy from the primary windings combined in the common rotor slots with the secondary windings
and the generated energy. As a result, the current and voltage at the output increase accordingly.
In one of the installations made by the authors, having collector brushes and 20 lamellas, andfour
containing 20 sectors per primary winding consisted of several turns of a conductor, it is effectively carried
rotor,out in
rotation from 48 volts DC amperes, that is, 1200 watts was needed to rotate at a frequency of 1750 revolutions
so that
per minute. at 25
At the same time, the secondary windings consisted of such a number of turns to effectively output 60
cycles per second (by transformation and generation) at 110 volts and 32 amperes, that is, 3520 watts could be
obtained at the output.
Let's compare two drawings of Dynamo Tesla and M-G Alexander:
The difference is not visually visible, is it possible to clarify from the description, Tesla
supplied alternating current through the slip rings, and removed a pulse current of a certain
frequency through the collector-brush assembly. At Alexander, everything is in reverse order,
they supply direct current and remove alternating current. Patent US359748 " Dina-
my electric machine " N. Tesla [1887]
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Unfortunately, there is no mention in the
even patent about pre-
educator. It's about improving
dynamo-
machines, but in fact a DC generator. I think
that an accurate description of the device is
freely available, a demonstration
which was produced at Columbia College of

Engineering
nerve electricians, May 20, 1891, no. And the
author of the note used
others historical
chniks, on the basis of which the author made

his sketch
constructions. Tesla has so many interesting solutions in patents that are not paid attention to, I
believe that the RAGEN system is a design turned inside out, similar in principle to Tesla's
system in essence. Which is repeated by Robert Alexander, and probably many other
engineers, who did not even suspect about such a solution, which simply suggests itself based
on all the postulates of electromechanics.
There is another device in the same way according to the principle of operation of the
electric machine converter 2: 1, while it is named after the direct action.
Patent RU2460200 " Self-rotating generator
electrical impulses " ; Authors of the patent: Kanarev Philip Mikhailovich (RU); Shevtsov
Anatoly Alexandrovich (RU); Dmitry Sazonov (RU); Sklyanoy Igor Vladimirovich (RU); Zatsarinin
Sergey Borisovich (RU). Patentee: Investments-Technologies LLC (RU).
The MG-1 motor generator has a conventional rotor and a conventional stator. The rotor plays the role of the
motor, and the stator plays the role of the generator (Fig. 1). It took about 100 years to figure out how to get the generator
rotor to rotate without external drive.
Tests of the first model MG-1 began in early June 2010 and continue to this day. The results already obtained
are presented in the article “Power balance of the motor generator”, but it is not yet possible to publish it in full, since it
contains too much information that belongs to the category of commercial secrets. Therefore, we publish in a generalized
form only fragments of this article.
http://www.sciteclibrary.ru/rus/catalog/pages/10542.html
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Video clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzLHKK_sZiE
There is very little information, mostly declarative or theoretical, there was no disclosure
of design features.
Author's note by F.M. Kanarev
(http://www.sciteclibrary.ru/rus/catalog/pages/10460.html)
Generators of electrical energy are a long-standing invention of mankind. They are the main sources of
electrical energy. In order for them to produce it, a primary source of energy is needed, the role of which is most often
played by water or water vapor. There are also generators that rotate by electric motors that consume energy from the
electrical network. In this case, as usual, the electric motor rotates the generator rotor,
and stator develops electric energy. The laws old

Electrodynamics prohibit the existence of such a generator, the rotor of which would be connected to the electrical
network, and the stator would generate electrical energy, or vice versa, the stator would be connected to the electrical
network, and the rotor would generate electrical energy. The laws of the new Electrodynamics, on the contrary, suggest
how to make such a generator, and it was made (Photo). The terms of reference for its manufacture, developed by us,
turned out to be surprisingly simple, and it was successfully implemented by the most talented Russian engineer S.B.
Zatsarinin.
Two-month trials self-rotating generator electrical

impulses showed that the future belongs to such generators. At the same time, the energy consumption for idling of a
self-rotating generator of electrical impulses is reduced to almost zero, and the increased moment of inertia of the rotor
easily overcomes mechanical resistance and small short-term magnetic resistance. As a result, the energy generated in
the stator is determined not by the energy supplied from an external power source, but by the kinetic energy of the rotor,
which it receives during startup. Subsequently, its value is maintained by short-term pulses of the primary power source,
which leads to the fact that the amount of generated energy becomes greater than the amount of consumed energy. In
addition, for the first time, the principle of energy recuperation of impulses that inhibit the rotation of the rotor was used to
power the generator. So far, a 5-fold excess at 2000 rpm has been steadily recorded. At high speeds, a 10-fold excess is
recorded, but the small moment of inertia of the rotor does not allow for a long
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(more than 10 minutes) hold this mode. The readings of the devices of the LIGA-12 serial gas-welding apparatus and the
experimental electrolyzer were compared with the same burner flame. In this case, only the EMF pulses of the stator
self-induction were used. The electrolyzer automatically reduced their amplitude by a factor of 21.50 and increased the
duration by the same amount.
The first sample of a self-rotating generator generates current pulses up to 120A, and the second, which is
already in the manufacturing stage, will generate current pulses up to 200A with a duty cycle of pulses in the electrolyzer
close to unity and rotor revolutions from 3000 to 5000 rpm This will be a generator for powering the electrolysers.
Another feature of a self-rotating generator of electrical impulses, which is now called a motor-generator (MG),
is the complexity of its multifunctional use.
For instance, motor generator, designed for nutrition
electrolyzer, will not be able to realize its functions to drive a car instead of a gasoline engine. This raises the problem of
designing generators for specific purposes. But, as the accumulated experience has shown, it is solvable and the road is
already open for household power units (5-10 kW), for which the battery energy is quite enough. In this case, the generator
will automatically recharge
battery ... The battery power will also be enough for the energy block driving the car. However, the author categorically
rejects the commercialization of the MG and conducts experiments only to test the new theory of the microworld and, in
particular, the new laws of electrodynamics.
Two such devices were made and tested. Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxbtVaiXilg
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

We can believe in anything or not believe, but the fact remains that there are
motor-generator-type devices combined with a single rotor (anchor), demonstrated, and
successfully hidden. Does society really need such devices, and they will not be in demand?
Why are they hiding, draw your own conclusions. We already know how to get more from the
magnetic flux than we invest. Everything rests on constructive engineering solutions.
Unfortunately, apart from the data that has been published, there is no more information in the
public domain.
The main way in electromechanical without inertial devices for obtaining: more than
invested - is the reinforced magnetic induction of the core acting on the conductor of the
generator phase. In this case, the possibility of taking off this induced energy must be calculated
and ensured. Combining a motor and a generator in one housing with a common rotor, active or
passive, is definitely possible. Everything needs to be designed and counted on, and boom, get
a predictable negative result. Generating systems produced by the industry are designed based
on technical specifications. Therefore, their application without taking into account the realities
will have a negative result. Generation in modern generators is based on overcoming the
electromagnetic attraction between the rotor and stator. At the same time, the energy output at
kg / watt is one of the best. Problems
costs will lie in justification prices. A task the same
interested in their energy independence to have their own electricity on demand. No

electromechanical device can dramatically change the generation parameters.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Moreover, the very phase of the generator must be protected from the reactive EMF of
consumption devices. It's a whole system again. In my opinion, the best option is the already
worked out autonomous power system of the house through a buffer storage in the form of a
battery. Only with the appropriate power, the battery capacity is significantly reduced. And here
is an inverter to provide mains voltage, power surges during starting currents. Short-term
consumption of high power is solved by grid-type inverters, which are specially designed for this
purpose. These devices are not cheap, but their functions, the margin of safety invested in the
grid inverter should impress you. The operation of such a device assumes 24/7 operation.
Therefore, I declare with full responsibility that generating 220V / 50Hz from the generator phase
directly to the network is a utopia.
The material is intended for private review. It is specific information for those interested,
and a hint on how to implement such a device.
Everything is only in your will, desire and abilities. If it is difficult alone, then group
participation in the development and manufacture of the device, various specialized specialists
will only increase the guarantee of creating such a device. One knows turning, plumbing, the
other electrical engineering, electronics, all together you will power, not only for yourself, but
also for others.
Best regards, Serge Rakarskiy March

25, 2020 (May 22, 2019) Kiev, Ukraine
http://rakarskiy.narod.ru
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To everyone who is convinced that something is being hidden from you, or you believe that it is
impossible to get more at the output of the converter than you have invested at the input, I would like to inform
you that this statement is only true for the mutual induction system or traditional mechanical power generation.
But there is also a transformation mechanism that can be called the term TRANSGENERATION. This
conversion mechanism can be performed both in an electromechanical version (Motor-Dynamo Nikola Tesla,
MotorGenerator Robert Alexander, Rotoverter RaGen), and in a static version of direct TRANSGENERATION.
A condition for obtaining higher output power. is an

conversion based on magnetic field amplification in the core ( relative magnetic permeability). The question of
the optimal design solution. In the static version, the first to come to such a solution was the Spanish engineer
Clemente Figuera (patents 1902 and 1908). It turns out a very interesting system of what to do at home with a
colossal COP
device becomes possible on
elementary base available. This material is a design guide
rotoverter RAGEN will be supplemented with a version of the static converter, and materials AS-Reactor will be
supplemented. Everyone who has acquired the materials by
RAGEN rotovertoru, or acquires before updating the material, will receive a complete updated set of materials
with a calculation calculator for free. All devices do not go beyond the laws and rules of academic physics.
I'm not going to prove anything to anyone. Everyone has the right to perceive this information as his
education or religion allows. I'm just returning technology that's over 100 years old and in plain sight.
Full material (123 pages).
Interested in: https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2021/01/rotoverter-ragen.html
This is not the price of technology, this is the price of my labor over technology! The technology that is in any
textbook for the designer, it’s small enough to put everything together.
Will you be able to master and accomplish this? You decide. The solution will surely be so original and
obvious that the question arises why didn't they do it earlier?
I think the technology has been made and rediscovered many times, but it is still closed to this day.
This material removes this misunderstanding.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Tesla Electromotive Car English

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Tesla Electromotive Car English

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Just excerpts

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 2 of 58

2. Design work ( design; calculations; determination of the possibility of using standard

3. Ordering components for manufacturing on production equipment, purchasing standard

five. Debugging the operation algorithm with satisfactory performance indicators.

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 3 of 58

poles relatively cheeks coils motor

the form for

otherwise you can

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 6 of 58

If it is possible to order this structural element, make it from professional

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 7 of 58

electric conductor in screen, with by all

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 8 of 58

Mutual induction, this is broadcast energy between two

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 9 of 58

not skew in magnetic field

conductor a plus and minus, differences potentials

Let's try a little

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 12 of 58

energy Wednesday forms his energy

Obviously, for sufficiently large

Here: ε 0 = 8.85419 ⋅ 10-12 F / m - electrical constant, ρ -

It is especially advantageous to use a triangular current waveform, since at

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 14 of 58

I - current strength in the conductor [ AND]; U - electrical voltage (potential

resistance Battery = 0.02 Ohm, resistance

I ( A) = EMF gen. - U bat. / R sum = R [ L (a + b + c)] + r bat.

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 15 of 58

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 16 of 58

Let's analyze the first - QW winding:

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 17 of 58

pathogen, and second as secondary front

If you look at the complete scheme of Bedini, from his patent US

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 19 of 58

executed by this patent, open not

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 20 of 58

We will count on 13.5 volts.

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 21 of 58

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 22 of 58

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 23 of 58

charged capacitor, and for the secondary

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 24 of 58

exists. Everything read correctly

put everything in its place. And so we

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 25 of 58

Single phase generator, nothing new. Moreover, I propose to use a controlled

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 26 of 58

* 1 Side panels - 2 pcs.

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 27 of 58

Provide output ends wires in side

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 28 of 58

the corresponding devices. If a you will, make

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 29 of 58

- Elimination of defects, etc.

Checking the operation of the generator winding (recuperation). Manufacturing of a

Assembly products in finished device. Registration

Calculation and manufacture of stator panels of the motor-generator.

The first classic motor,

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy Sys

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 31 of 58

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 32 of 58

There are also special tables in the numerous literature.

Project SOURCE * Rakarskiy Ideas Studio - Free Energy System * Page 33 of 58