20210217-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To PM MR SCOTT MORRISON & Ors-Re Vaccination Issues

Page 1
1
2
3 PM Mr Scott Morrison 17-2-2021
4 Forwarded via email
5
6 Cc: acv@health.gov.au
7 Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Therapeutic Goods Administration
8 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606
9 Attn: Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, MDP 122
10
11 Committees@health.gov.au
12 Committee Support Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration
13 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606
14 Attn: Scheduling & Committee Support Section, MDP 122
15
16
17 20210217-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to PM Mr SCOTT MORRISON& Ors
18 Re Vaccination issues
19 Sir,
20 I will first of all quote a part of the website that is stated to provide you with emails:
21
22 https://www.pm.gov.au/contact-your-pm
23
24 Contact Your PM | Prime Minister of Australia
25
26 CONTACT YOUR PM
27 QUOTE
28  Correspondence containing threatening content or advocating illegal activities will be forwarded
29 to the Australian Federal Police (AFP).
30 END QUOTE
31
32 I therefore expect indeed demand that the Australian federal Police investigate the conduct of the
33 TGA to approve so-called vaccinations which I view are done UNDER FALSEHOOD. For this,
34 I demand that all and any vaccination in the meantime is prohibited until such police
35 investigation has been appropriately completed and any action that may follow have been taken
36 and also completed.
37 .
38 I have in recent weeks published various articles as to my concern about so called “vaccines”
39 and rather to quote all of it will below refer to the weblinks so they can be downloaded.
40
41 This is a correspondence about “VACCINES” but I first will try to explain how an innocent
42 statement can have serious problems.
17-2-2021 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 Let me first give you an example how something innocent can be ending up to be deceptive.
2 .
3 For arguments, sake you go home and your wife having a fully scheduled day ahead of her
4 decide to make an early night. So you come home and decide to play a prank on her. You
5 go fully clothed under the shower (albeit wearing a cap over your head to avoid your hair
6 getting wet) and well then hang your wet clothing above the bat. Well hours later your wife
7 notice the wet clothing and wonders how on earth you got wet when to her knowledge
8 there was no rain whatsoever. You just tell her that there was a freak rain and you just
9 happened to get soaking wet. She just accept that this might happen.
10 A few week later you decide to repeat the prank and do the same albeit when you open the
11 bathroom door your wife happen to stand there and well you got caught. So, you tell her
12 that someone spilled red wine over your clothes and so you better had it wet to prevent it to
13 stain. Your wife is well aware that this is rubbish but she simply put the clothing in the
14 washing machine for soaking. The next morning one of your daughters ask her mother
15 why your clothes are in the washing machine (as ordinary your wife never leaves clothing
16 inn it) and you wife just tell her to soak the clothing because of the red wine stain.
17 A few days later this daughter was talking with her fiend and happen to mention that her
18 mother got rid of red wine stain from your clothing. This friend happen to mention to her
19 mother who just spilled some red wine over her clothing as she better contact your wife as
20 she knows how to get it out. She does and your wife explains she doesn’t remember how
21 she did it as she used a mixture of cleaners. It must be obvious that what your wife now is
22 doing is to continue a lie that never really was intended to be so.
23 .
24 And this at times is how a prank later can turn out to be an elaborate lie.
25
26 And well this is going about also everywhere else where someone makes an innocent comment
27 but then it goes on and on and then well it is as if it is the truth. Those involved then do not want
28 to admit to the truth and simply continue the lie rather than to admit to the truth.
29
30 I was by one of my readers provided with an email that contained the following details also and
31 have highlighted in red colour some of my concerns:
32
33 QUOTE
34 healthachievers - <healthachievers@hotmail.com>
35 Tue, 16 Feb at 10:31 pm
36 Comirnaty is a vaccine for preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in

37 people aged 16 years and older. Comirnaty contains a molecule called
38 messenger RNA (mRNA) with instructions for producing a protein from SARS-
39 CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.21 Dec 2020
40 COVID-19 vaccine: Pfizer Australia -

41 COMIRNATY BNT162b2 (mRNA)
42 25 January 2021
43 The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has granted provisional approval

44 to Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd for its COVID-19 vaccine, COMIRNATY, making it the
45 first COVID-19 vaccine to receive regulatory approval in Australia.
Page 3
1 Following a thorough and independent review of Pfizer's submission, the

2 TGA has decided that this vaccine meets the high safety, efficacy and
3 quality standards required for use in Australia.
4 COMIRNATY is provisionally approved and included in the Australian Register

5 of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) for active immunisation to prevent
6 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, in
7 individuals 16 years of age and older.
8 Provisional approval of this vaccine is valid for two years and means it can
9 now be legally supplied in Australia. The approval is subject to certain strict
10 conditions, such as the requirement for Pfizer to continue providing
11 information to the TGA on longer term efficacy and safety from ongoing clinical
12 trials and post-market assessment. COMIRNATY has been shown to
13 prevent COVID-19 however, it is not yet known whether it
14 prevents transmission or asymptomatic disease.
15 Australians can be confident that the TGA's review process of this

16 vaccine was rigorous and of the highest standard. The decision to
17 provisionally approve the vaccine was also informed by expert advice from
18 the Advisory Committee on Vaccines (ACV), an independent committee with
19 expertise in scientific, medical and clinical fields including consumer
20 representation.
21 The TGA will continue to actively monitor the safety of the Pfizer vaccine both
22 in Australia and overseas and will not hesitate to take action if safety concerns
23 are identified. As an extra check, the TGA laboratories will undertake batch
24 assessment of each batch of the vaccine before it can be supplied in Australia.
25
26 TGA provisionally approves

27 AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine
28 16 February 2021
29 The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has granted provisional

30 approval to AstraZeneca Pty Ltd for its COVID-19 vaccine, making it the
31 second COVID-19 vaccine to receive regulatory approval in Australia.
32 COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is provisionally approved and included in the

33 Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) for the active immunisation
34 of individuals 18 years and older for the prevention of coronavirus disease
35 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2. The use of this vaccine should be in
36 accordance with official recommendations and given in two separate doses.

Page 4
1 "TGA's regulatory approval allows the second dose to be administered from 4

2 to 12 weeks after the first. The Australian Technical Advisory Group on
3 Immunisation has recommended that the interval between first and second
4 dose is 12 weeks. However if this interval is not possible, for example because
5 of imminent travel, cancer chemotherapy, major elective surgery, a minimum
6 interval of 4 weeks between doses can be used.
9 conditions, such as the requirement for AstraZeneca to continue providing
10 information to the TGA on longer term efficacy and safety from ongoing
11 clinical trials and post-market assessment. COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca
12 has been shown to prevent COVID-19 however it is not yet known whether
13 it prevents transmission or asymptomatic disease.
14 My comments: Note: "ongoing clinical trials" - what the heck? Proof

15 that the people are being clinically trialled!!!
16 Elderly patients over 65 years of age demonstrated a

17 strong immune response (high seroconversion rates)
18 to the vaccine in clinical trials, however there were an
19 insufficient number of participants infected by COVID-
20 19 to conclusively determine the efficacy in this
21 subgroup. In this sub-population, efficacy has been inferred from
22 immunogenicity data and efficacy demonstrated in the general population.
23 Reassuringly, there were no safety concerns in this age group in the
24 clinical studies, nor in the large numbers of elderly people who have
25 been vaccinated to date in overseas rollouts. The decision to immunise
26 an elderly patient should be decided on a case-by-case basis with
27 consideration of age, co-morbidities and their environment taking into
28 account the benefits of vaccination and potential risks. Further
29 information from ongoing clinical trials and post-market monitoring is
30 expected in coming months. Additional details can be found in the Product
31 Information and Australian Public Assessment Report (AusPAR).
32 Initial supply of this vaccine will be imported into Australia from overseas,
33 however it is anticipated that ongoing supply will be manufactured in
34 Australia. Prior to supply of vaccines manufactured onshore, AstraZeneca will
35 submit further information and data to the TGA to confirm that onshore
36 manufacturing will meet strict quality standards.

38 vaccine was rigorous and of the highest standard. The decision to
39 provisionally approve the vaccine was also informed by expert advice from
40 the Advisory Committee on Vaccines (ACV), an independent committee with
41 expertise in scientific, medical and clinical fields including consumer
42 representation.
Page 5
1 As with all vaccine approvals, the TGA will:
2  Continue to actively monitor the vaccine in Australia and

3 overseas and will not hesitate to take action if safety concerns are
4 identified.
5  Undertake laboratory batch assessment of each batch of the

6 vaccine before it can be supplied in Australia.
7 The TGA has published a series of regulatory documents that relate to this
8 decision, including the Australian Public Assessment Report (AusPAR) and
9 the decision summary, which provide details about the evidence that the TGA
10 reviewed to support the provisional approval of the vaccine. The Product
11 Information, FAQs and information on labelling and batch testing are also
12 available on the COVID-19 vaccines hub.
13 Further information on the COVID-19 vaccine rollout is available on

14 the Department of Health website(link is external).
15 END QUOTE
16
17 Now lets check the TGA statement:
18
19 QUOTE
20 for preventing coronavirus disease
21 END QUOTE
22
23
24 QUOTE
25 to prevent coronavirus disease
26 END QUOTE
27
28 20210215-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE –
29 TGA, vaccinations, DNA & the Rule of LAW-Supplement- 3
30 QUOTE 15-2-201 document
31 **#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, firstly let us consider what Brianne Barker, a virologist at
32 Drew University in New Jersey made clear about vaccinations.
33
34 https://www.livescience.com/covid-19-vaccine-efficacy-explained.html
35 COVID-19 vaccines: What does 95% efficacy actually mean? | Live ...
36 Brianne Barker, a virologist at Drew University in New Jersey
37 QUOTE
38 And none of the three vaccine trials looked at all for asymptomatic COVID-19. "All these
39 efficacy numbers are protection from having symptoms, not protection from being
40 infected," Barker said.
41 END QUOTE
42
43 And “not protection from being infected” seems to come out in reality that those so called
44 “vaccines” are not at all protecting individuals against the virus at all but merely may provide
45 “protection from having symptoms”. Then again, as set out below one also can die because
46 of the complications that may result from being vaccinated.
47 END QUOTE 15-2-201 document
Page 6
1 Again:
2 not protection from being infected
3
4 Actually I understand from recent statement made by Dr Fauci CDC (USA) and WHO (World
5 Health Organisation) that both made clear that the “vaccine” doesn’t prevent infection but may
6 only reduce the symptoms of any infection in “mild” cases. As such in my view the statement by
7 TGA is a FALSHOOD.
8
9 While I do not claim to have any medical and/or science training/degrees nevertheless where the
10 CDC and WHO as well as others make clear that the vaccines do not prevent becoming infected,
11 as this has been shown time and time again that those vaccinated nevertheless became infected
12 and even died that therefore the TGA statement in my view is totally irresponsible and indeed I
13 view must be deemed to be the product of deception and as such the approvals must be
14 withdrawn/cancelled.
15
16 I noted that the following were allegedly the advisors:
17
18 The Committee is established under Regulation 39F of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 and the
19 members are appointed by the Minister for Health.
20 The ACV was established in January 2017, following consolidation of previous functions of the Advisory
21 Committee on the Safety of Vaccines (ACSOV) and the pre-market functions for vaccines of the Advisory
22 Committee on Prescription Medicines (ACPM).
23 Membership comprises professionals with expertise in specific scientific, medical or clinical fields, or
24 consumer health issues.
25 Membership
26 Chair
27 Professor Allen Cheng is an infectious diseases physician. His current appointments are as Director,
28 Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology at Alfred Health, Professor in the Department of
29 Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine at Monash University, and as an Honorary Senior Research Fellow
30 at the Menzies School of Health Research. Professor Cheng has diverse clinical experience in metropolitan
31 and regional hospitals in Australia and internationally, and research interests in clinical infectious diseases,
32 tropical medicine and influenza epidemiology. His PhD thesis was on the bacterial disease melioidosis.
33 Professor Cheng is the Vice-President of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases. He has published
34 over 200 peer-reviewed scientific publications. He is currently a co-chair of the Australian Technical
35 Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI). Professor Cheng provides expertise in the field of infectious
36 diseases in adults and children.
37 Members
38 Professor Jim Buttery is a specialist paediatric infectious diseases clinician. Professor Buttery serves as the
39 Head of Epidemiology and Surveillance for SAEFVIC and the head of Monash Immunisation at Monash
40 Health, as well as head of the Department of Infection and Immunity at Monash Children's Hospital. He is
41 currently serving on the Victorian Immunisation Advisory Committee and is a member of the WHO Strategic
42 Advisory Group of the Global Vaccine Safety Initiative. In October 2020, he will take up the inaugural Chair

Page 7
1 in Child Health Informatics at the University of Melbourne. Professor Buttery provides expertise in
2 infectious diseases in children, epidemiology, vaccine program implementation, and paediatrics.
3 Dr Jeanine Bygott is a medical practitioner with a specialty in microbiology and experience in travel
4 medicine clinics in Australia and Ireland. Currently a consultant medical microbiologist at Sullivan
5 Nicolaides Pathology, a private pathology laboratory in Queensland, she provides advice to general
6 practitioners on the administration of vaccines. She has completed a Master of Public Health and Tropical
7 Medicine and a Diploma Course in Vaccinology at the Pasteur Institute in Paris. She is also a Fellow of the
8 Royal Australasian College of Pathologists in medical microbiology and virology. Dr Bygott provides
9 expertise in bacteriology, virology, and the provision of immunisation treatment by an individual.
10 Associate Professor Rosemary Ffrench is the Principal Scientist at the National Serology Reference
11 Laboratory, Principal Fellow at the Burnet Institute, and a consultant to the World Health Organization on
12 maintaining laboratory capacity in emergency settings. Her academic appointment at Monash University
13 includes lecturing on vaccines, infectious diseases and immunology. She has published extensively on human
14 immunity and vaccine development and holds a patent for the MicroCube vaccine platform. Associate
15 Professor Ffrench provides expertise in immunology, diagnostics and vaccine development.
16 Ms Madeline Hall is a Nurse Practitioner specialising in vaccine preventable diseases with a special interest
17 in vaccine safety. She has extensive experience in vaccine preventable diseases and is involved in advanced
18 health assessments and risk screening of adults with specific vaccination requirements, such as persons who
19 have had a previous serious or unexpected adverse event following immunisation, immuno-compromised
20 persons, and those at occupational risk. Ms Hall is a member of ATAGI and a member of the Adverse Events
21 Following Immunisation - Clinical Assessment Network. Ms Hall provides expertise in the fields of
22 provision of immunisation treatment by an individual and nursing.
23 Professor Kristine Macartney is the Director of the National Centre for Immunisation Research &
24 Surveillance, a paediatric infectious diseases specialist at The Children's Hospital at Westmead, and
25 Professor in the Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Sydney. Her doctoral thesis was on
26 rotavirus infection and mucosal immunity. She is the senior technical editor of the Australian Immunisation
27 Handbook and has research interests in viral vaccine preventable diseases, vaccine safety and policy-making.
28 Professor Macartney served on the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Vaccines throughout its period of
29 operation. Professor Macartney provides expertise in the fields of vaccinology, adverse events surveillance,
30 infectious diseases, virology, epidemiology and paediatrics.
31 Professor Lisa Nissen is the Head of the School of Clinical Sciences at the Queensland University of
32 Technology. A registered pharmacist, Professor Nissen was the chair of the Queensland Pharmacists
33 Immunisation Pilot and the research leader for the evaluation of the pilot implementation, tasked with
34 ensuring that the training development was fit for purpose and that the data collected included safety
35 outcomes. She worked with the Australian Pharmacy Council to develop accreditation standards for the
36 vaccination training programs for pharmacists. Her research interests include the quality use of medicines
37 and the factors that influence prescribing. Professor Nissen provides expertise in vaccine program
38 implementation.
39 Dr Vicky Sheppeard is a public health physician specialising in communicable disease control. As Director
40 of the Communicable Diseases Branch, NSW she delivered new immunisation programs, responded to
41 emerging infectious disease threats, and adopted innovative technologies. Dr Sheppeard has also served as
42 the NSW representative on Communicable Disease Network Australia and deputy chair of the National
43 Immunisation Committee. Dr Vicky Sheppeard provides expertise in the fields of communicable disease
44 control in adults and children and vaccine program implementation.
45 Associate Professor Adrienne Torda is a physician specialising in infectious diseases. She is a senior staff
46 specialist in the Department of Infectious Diseases at the Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney and an Associate
47 Professor in the Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney. She has a PhD, a Graduate Diploma of Bioethics, is an
Page 8
1 Associate Fellow of the Australia and New Zealand Association of Health Professional Educators and is a
2 Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy. Her research interests include translational research topics
3 such as vaccine coverage in vulnerable populations and diabetic foot infections. She is involved in a number
4 of medical education research projects, examining the impact of educational innovations in medicine. From
5 2004 to 2007 she was a member of the National Influenza Pandemic Committee. Associate Professor Torda
6 provides expertise in infectious diseases in adults and children.
7 Ms Diane Walsh is the Deputy Chair of the Board of the Northern Territory Primary Health Network (PHN)
8 and is currently on the Advisory Group of the PHN Immunisation Support Program. She previously served as
9 the chair of the Top End Division of General Practice Board of Management for over 10 years, and has been
10 a member of the Northern Territory Medical Board, the management committee of Health Consumers of
11 Rural and Remote Australia, and the National Medicines Policy Committee. Ms Walsh provided the
12 consumer perspective on the statutory Therapeutic Goods Committee, including on medicine labelling. She
13 has worked as a school teacher and operated a small business. Ms Walsh provides expertise in health issues
14 from the consumer perspective.
15 END QUOTE
16
17 While all those advisers may have amply of credits to their names nevertheless in the end to me
18 they are utterly worthless if they fail to be aware of the real issues and may have deceived the
19 TGA with their advice.
20
21 Let me now refer to something further:
22 QUOTE
23 Following a thorough and independent review of Pfizer's submission, the TGA
24 has decided that this vaccine meets the high safety, efficacy and quality
25 standards required for use in Australia.
26 END QUOTE
27
28 And
29
30 QUOTE
38 END QUOTE
39
40 And
41
42 QUOTE
48 subgroup. In this sub-population, efficacy has been inferred from
49 immunogenicity data and efficacy demonstrated in the general population.
Page 9

6 account the benefits of vaccination and potential risks.
7 END QUOTE
8 Again
9 QUOTE
12 been vaccinated to date in overseas rollouts.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 Anyone who read my 14-2-2021 article may view that those statements are utter crap
16
17
18 GENOCIDE? As I suspected, an estimated 115,000 Australian seniors could die from
19 the clash of antigens, etc, after vaccination. Let it be very clear that Moderna testing
20 of the vaccine “purposefully excluded individuals with comorbidities or
21 vulnerabilities” and yet the vaccine is specifically used and prioritise those.
22 “The Moderna vaccine trials included no individuals over 80 years old and only 20
23 individuals over 70. ” Neither the CDC, FDA or the Australian TGA could even for
24 emergency approve this so called vaccine for use for those “individuals with
25 comorbidities or vulnerabilities” in those circumstances. It is simply a sickening game
26 of MASS MURDER. “Is it possible that a particularly reactogenic vaccine (like
27 Moderna’s) could even kill more people than the disease against which it purportedly
28 promises immunity?”.
29
30 As such the TGA statement
31
32 QUOTE
38 subgroup.
39 END QUOTE
40
41 In my view is a FALSEHOOD this because those 20 who reportedly were included over the age
42 of 70 were “purposefully excluded individuals with comorbidities or vulnerabilities”. While
43 this related to the Moderna trials, nevertheless it must be clear that the TGA must ensure that any
44 testing is not merely to rubberstamp whatever eventuated in other countries to which it had no
45 oversight but that such trial should be conduct in Australia before any approval is to be given.
46 .
47
48 The irony might be that Pauline Hanson may pursue more, even if unintended, to protect
49 the health and wellbeing of Aboriginals then those who denounce her.
50
51 This document can be downloaded from:
Page 10
1 https://www.scribd.com/document/447333377/20200217-PRESS-RELEASE-Mr-G-H-Schorel-
2 Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-Re-is-It-an-Aboriginal-Oriental-Corona-Virus
3
4 20200217-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE –
5 Re Is it an Aboriginal Oriental Corona virus?
6
7 What I referred to more than a year ago, yes more than a year ago, that Aboriginals may be more
8 vulnerable due to their genetic make up seems to have been born out around the world that also
9 people of colour are more likely to succumb as result of the virus and the vaccination.
10 Therefore, before any kind of vaccination is to be approved it would require a special trial
11 involving Aboriginals and others persons of colour to ascertain this is not just going to end up as
12 a GENOCIDE against certain groups of colour.
13
14 Let me use an example how vaccinations in one part of the world may succeed, and yet can be a
15 total disaster in another part of the world. As my articles makes clear that in some countries like
16 Africa children who were vaccinated had a death ratio being 10 times that of unvaccinated
17 children in the same area. As such, any vaccination that may even be very successful in one area
18 of the world can be a GENOCIDE in another part of the world. Hence, any expert who relies on
19 overseas testing better have his/her read examined as to what on earth this is about. This in my
20 view is not examining FACTS but merely assuming that whatever some person somewhere else
21 in the world may claim somehow is automatically (rubberstamped) for Australia purposes.
22 .
23 Well, the TGA I understand did this for decades and well when Del Bigtree and lawyer Robert F
24 Kennedy took the matter to court it was then admitted that for more than 30 years no safety
25 checking was ever conducted. As such every medical doctor, scientist, politicians, etc, in
26 Australia claiming that certain vaccines were safe were merely parroting what was claimed by
27 the CDC (USA) rather than having really done any proper consideration.
28 .
29 QUOTE
31 vaccine was rigorous and of the highest standard.
32 END QUOTE
33
34 How on earth can anyone be assured that the TGA applied the “review process” in
35 “rigorous and of the highest standard ” when even now overseas reports are of people
36 dying some shortly after vaccinations?
37
38 https://default.salsalabs.org/T8a41c541-3438-4af3-bb0a-38f25b3f07f2/8192d8ae-267b-47b2-
39 ad62-bf2c9324c002
40 653 Deaths + 12,044 Other Injuries Reported
41 Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show
42
43
44 https://www.ntd.com/authorities-investigating-after-covid-19-vaccine-recipients-develop-rare-
45 blood-disorder_565552.html
46
47 Authorities Investigating After COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients Develop Rare Blood Disorder
48 (ntd.com)
49

Page 11
1 Authorities Investigating After

2 COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients
3 Develop Rare Blood Disorder
4
5 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/doctor-dies-second-dose-covid-
6 vaccine/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e6b37aec-89c0-44b5-be90-
7 d2376c84bfcb
8
9 36-Year-Old Doctor Dies After Second Dose of COVID Vaccine • Children's Health Defense
10 36-Year-Old Doctor Dies After Second Dose of COVID Vaccine

11
12 There are plenty of reports of what were to be healthy young doctors dying after they were
13 vaccinated.
14
15
16 https://thevaccinereaction.org/vaccination/risk-failure-reports/
17 Health Care Worker in Orange County, California Dies Four
18 Days After Getting COVID-19 Vaccine
19 by TVR Staff
20 Published February 14, 2021 | Vaccination, Risk & Failure Reports
21
22
23
24 https://te.legra.ph/AUSTRALIA-FIRST-TO-FALL-TO-BILLIONAIRE-NWO-CULT-
25 DIGITAL-PASSPORT-AND-VACCINATION-02-16
26
27 AUSTRALIA FIRST TO FALL TO BILLIONAIRE NWO CULT: DIGITAL PASSPORT
28 AND VACCINATION
29 www.bitchute.comFebruary 16, 2021
30 QUOTE
31 See for yourself what you will need if you want to travel to Australia after October
32 2021. It involves your mobile phone and a vaccine certificate, or without these you
33 may be put into quarantine (if quarantine is an option).
34 The first part of the billionaire global cult agenda has rolled out (look up ID2020 and
35 COVI-Pass). The announcer, Australia’s Minister for Population, did not guarantee that
36 people could enter Australia from October 2021 without a vaccination. Now the New
37 World Order plan is no longer a conspiracy theory - it is real.
38 UPDATE 11/24/20: Quantas CEO says a Corona virus vaccine will be required to travel on
39 the airline: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/qantas-airlines-covid-19-vaccine-alan-joyce/
40 Even if people can travel without a vaccine - but not on Quantas - initially, they will be
41 quarantined. What a way to spend your vacation! Then the quarantine provision will be
42 removed - on the grounds of one traveler being a "superspreader" - and replaced with:
43 YOU ONLY ENTER WITH A VACCINE. Then, they make a second vaccine mandatory,
44 and a third, and each vaccine will contain anti-fertility agents, just like Gates did with
Page 12
1 vaccinations in Kenya (Source: https://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-sterilization-kenyan-

2 doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-un-tetanus-vaccine-2/5678295)
3 This is how the cult works: they gradually and slowly make changes that restrict your
4 freedoms. The source of this video is:
5 https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6201935128001
6 Recently, some travelers to the state of Victoria (Melbourne) who [had to pay to go
7 through] the Australian state quarantine system in a hotel were put potentially at risk of
8 being infected with HIV and hepatitis B and C while at the hotel by people working for the
9 quarantine scheme. Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8855507/Victorias-
10 hotel-quarantine-guests-accidentally-infected-HIV-isolation.html
11 Would you want to be quarantined for most of your vacation time? You can’t see much
12 from your hotel room.
13 Expect New Zealand to be next, now that the smiley Cult Prime minister and puppet,
14 Jacinda Arden, has been re-elected. She is a puppet because she promotes the fake climate
15 change agenda: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLKtfK5pzns (And see:
16 https://www.bitchute.com/video/lZkgFuAOi22X/ for details of the Hoax).
17 If Biden - sorry - Harris is elected as president then the Democrats will re-write the
18 constitution to stop you from traveling internationally without a vaccine. If the Dems
19 didn’t change the constitution, an alternative is that the Cult will use its representatives in
20 most other countries to copy what Australia has done, so that anyone living in the USA
21 won’t be able to travel into another country without having had a vaccine before leaving.
22 Source www.bitchute.com
23 Made by @chotamreaderbot
24 END QUOTE
25
26 Remember:
27 QUOTE
35 END QUOTE
36
37 How on earth can it be deemed appropriate to demand a vaccination passport when the TGS
38 made clear “clinical trials ”. Moreover, as I have indicated that where the vaccination or
39 sorts do not prevent a person to become infected then the entire “vaccine passport” in my view is
40 utterly worthless. A person can be vaccine and still suffer from COVID and can still be a SUPER
41 SPREADER and can end up dying on a plane and well anyone then becoming infected at least
42 can rest assure that the person had a “VACCINATION PASSPORT” and had been vaccinated.
43 Ok the other passengers may still die, but again at least they knew their dead was the result of a
44 person who had a “VACCINATION PASSPORT”.
45
46 Again:
47 QUOTE
Page 13

3 account the benefits of vaccination and potential risks.
4 END QUOTE
5 Again
6 QUOTE
9 been vaccinated to date in overseas rollouts.
10 END QUOTE
11
12 There can be no reassuring if the TGA merely relies on whatever claimed overseas trials may
13 have been conducted as I view it should have supervised its own trials to be to Australian
14 standards.
15 As my various articles make clear that the is no need to vaccinate the elderly who already
16 overcame the COVID issue because their antigens already are there and to vaccinate them may
17 rather be to kill them off due to the risk of a clash of antigens.
18
19 As I understand it, there have been repeated warning that even to give a flu vaccination to the
20 elderly can be very dangerous and may easily kill the person.
21
22 I understand that Premier Daniel Andrews of Victoria now (February 2021) raises to have
23 special quarantine facilities for those who have to isolate, just that around the middle of 2020 I
24 then already pointed out that special accommodation for quarantine purposes with ICU facilities
25 is required instead of the hotel quarantine crap.
26
27 https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/coronavirus-
28 lab-escape-theory.html
29
30 Did the Coronavirus Escape From a Lab? (nymag.com)
31 I N V E S T IG A T IO N S JAN. 4, 2021
34 For decades, scientists have been hot-wiring viruses in hopes of
35 preventing a pandemic, not causing one. But what if …?
36
37
38 https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-02-12-mag-admits-fauci-hot-wired-coronavirus.html
39 NY Mag admits Fauci “hot-wired” coronavirus with gain-of-

40 function engineering
41 QUOTE
42 “We are making this the highest priority,” Fauci said at the time. “We are really
43 marshaling all available resources.”
44 Fauci was also concerned that it was taking far too long to develop new vaccines.
45 His stated goal was to develop new “vaccine systems” and “vaccine platforms” that
46 could be tailored to develop new vaccine drugs within a day.
Page 14
1 “Our goal within the next 20 years is ‘bug to drug’ in 24 hours,” Fauci said. “This
2 would specifically meet the challenge of genetically engineered bioagents.”
3 The first “Project Bioshield” contract, as it is called, was awarded by Fauci to

4 VaxGen, a California pharmaceutical company. Fauci gave the company $878
5 million in taxpayer money to create new anthrax vaccines.
6 Interestingly, it has been almost exactly 20 years since Fauci made those
7 statements, and here we are with President Donald Trump’s “Operation Warp
8 Speed” program, which fast-tracked the release of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19)
9 vaccines at speeds never before seen.
10 When challenged by some 750 scientists in a letter protesting the direction in

11 which he was taking the NIH, Fauci doubled down and insisted that the money
12 needed to be spent “on biodefense.”
13 “We disagree with the notion that biodefense concerns are of ‘low public-health
14 significance,'” he added.
15 Be sure to check out New York magazine’s full exposé on traitor Fauci and his
16 longtime efforts to weaponize deadly pathogens.
17 END QUOTE
18
19 As I understand it from various reports Dr A Fauci set out to create a special virus that could
20 decimate the human race so he could create a vaccine. Reportedly, he had about $53 million
21 from USA taxpayers but then subsequently had another 1.7 Billion of USA taxpayers. When
22 then the program was by then President Obama to be stopped Dr A Fauci then had the project
23 done at Wuhan, China. It simply was to use the existing virus for the fly/common cold to inset
24 something so it would more readily spread. I understand that in July 2019 the Chinese
25 Government urged Chinese to have any person who may display some flu symptoms to be
26 checked at a hospital. As such, the virus was then already getting out of hand and I understand
27 dead bodies were already piling up. There is more to it all as I have previously written about.
28 Safe to say that irrespective if this virus was accidentally released from the Wuhan laboratory or
29 it result that some person who was a participant in a trial somehow then became the super
30 spreader, is not my issue, safe to say that this “modified” virus became a problem.
31 While China did its clamping down such as a lockdown in about January 2020, by then the virus
32 had already been spreading for most of the year and both Chinese residents and international
33 travellers then were infected and travelling around the world. I understand that in France already
34 a person with the virus was in hospital in October 2019, they just then didn’t have the name of
35 the virus.
36 The mere fact that Dr A Fauci obtained in 2012 patents for this vaccination may underline that
37 this was not some accidental virus somehow mutated and spread around the world but was
38 deliberately engineered. There are always what one may refer to as “mad scientist” who are
39 willing to play with the lives of the innocent for the sake of achieving something they desire.
40

Page 15
1 In my view, what any scientist/medical doctor should do is demand that Dr A Fauci reveals what
2 really was created, etc. Yet, instead as I wrote about he is flip-flopping about making at times
3 contradictory claims and as I understand it like with HIV rather sacrifice millions of lives then to
4 act in the interest of humanity.
5
6 Getting back to this part:
7 QUOTE
8 The decision to immunise an elderly patient should be decided on a
9 case-by-case basis with consideration of age, co-morbidities and their
10 environment taking into account the benefits of vaccination and
11 potential risks.
12 END QUOTE
13
14 I in fact indicated in my previous writings that any “medical treatment” must be under the
15 supervision of a qualified medical doctor a specialist in this area of medical issues and not that
16 someone goes around into a nursing home and start injecting the elderly regardless of any
17 emergency facilities at hand nor the person qualified in this area of medical treatment as to be
18 able to provide appropriate assistance for an individual should there be an adverse reaction.
19 Indeed, having advertisement that one can simply go to a chemist to have the vaccination in my
20 view is totally irresponsible as the girl filling the shelves then may be given the task to inject
21 whomever without having any knowledge let alone qualifications as to how to handle any
22 emergency situation.
23 The wording “should be decided on a case-by-case” must be asked by whom? Surely
24 this should have been clarified, as after all even a General Practitioner (GP) may not be qualified
25 in this area to have any proper understanding of what may be relevant for any vaccination or not
26 to give such vaccination.
27 On the one hand the TGA appears to indicate that care should be taken with the elderly, but I
28 view its statement lacks any real directions/conditions.
29
30 Where the TGA makes known they are “clinical trials” then how on earth can the
31 Commonwealth government permit it to be “compulsory” and to pursue some sort of
32 “VACCINATION PASSPORT” as by this it indicates it couldn’t give a hood about the TGA as
33 it simply will enforce a New world Order nevertheless. So to say, stuff the constitution and the
34 right of citizens.
35
36 The time has come to hold the lairs of politicians, medical doctors, scientist and others
37 legally accountable for their “disinformation” and “FRAUD” about the safety of
38 vaccinations. Life long imprisonment may be the most appropriate reward for them.
39
42 Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-Election-Interferences-COVID-Vaccination-Issues
43
44
45 We must never accept that “snake oil” peddling politicians and their cohort can in
46 violation of the true meaning and application of the constitution inflict so much harm
47 upon We, the People by fake “vaccines”.
48
50 https://www.scribd.com/document/493187641/20210203-PRESS-RELEASE-Mr-G-H-
51 Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-Why-to-Arrest-Imprison-PM-Scott-Morrison-and-Co
52
Page 16
1
2 ‘Genocidal fake vaccinations’ must be condemned, and we must return to politicians and
3 others to work within ‘peace, order and good government’ and not contrary to it.
4
7 Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-Genocidal-Fake-Vaccinations
8
9
10 The Nuremberg Code-Hippocratic Oath must be enforced and in the process protect
11 individuals from uncalled harm, as I have set out in this document. See page 22 for
12 Darren’s petition.
13
16 Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-The-Nuremberg-Code-Hippocratic-Oath
17
18
19 We have a system that only legally qualified medical practitioners in certain medical fields
20 may perform relevant medical services such as in “mNRA” and “DNA” issues and hence
21 only with their specific approval can any individual being injected to alter the “DNA”.
22
24 https://www.scribd.com/document/494032809/20210210-Press-Release-Mr-G-H-Schorel-
25 Hlavka-O-W-B-Issue-TGA-Vaccinations-DNA-the-Rule-of-Law
26
27
28 Are politicians and their officials now pursuing EUGENICS/EUTHANASIA as a
29 method to enrich themselves with more power and serve their New World Order
30 mantra? Or will law abiding officials act appropriately to ensure “peace, order and
31 good government”?
32
35 Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-TGA-Vaccinations-DNA-the-Rule-of-LAW-Suppl-1
36
37 GENOCIDE? As I suspected, an estimated 115,000 Australian seniors could die from the
38 clash of antigens, etc, after vaccination. Let it be very clear that Moderna testing of the
39 vaccine “purposefully excluded individuals with comorbidities or vulnerabilities” and yet
40 the vaccine is specifically used and prioritise those. “The Moderna vaccine trials included no
41 individuals over 80 years old and only 20 individuals over 70. ” Neither the CDC, FDA or the
42 Australian TGA could even for emergency approve this so called vaccine for use for those
43 “individuals with comorbidities or vulnerabilities” in those circumstances. It is simply a
44 sickening game of MASS MURDER. “Is it possible that a particularly reactogenic vaccine
45 (like Moderna’s) could even kill more people than the disease against which it purportedly
46 promises immunity?”.
47
50 Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-TGA-Vaccinations-DNA-the-Rule-of-LAW-Suppl-2
51
Page 17
1
2 When it is admitted "All these efficacy numbers are protection from having
3 symptoms, not protection from being infected," and that so called vaccinations are
4 causing ‘Ticking Time Bomb’ to be created then we better make sure the TGA
5 doesn’t cut corners to unduly place the lives of many Australians at risk. It would
6 underline also that the so-called vaccinated passport would be utterly useless, for the
7 purpose it is supposed to be.
8
11 Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-TGA-Vaccinations-DNA-the-Rule-of-LAW-Suppl-3
12
13
14 My numerous other articles made clear that a doctor in New York about one year ago then
15 already warned that patients were being killed because the ventilators they were place upon were
16 not properly programmed for the relevant patient.
17
18 FW: Are We Being Punked?
19
20 The following article from Dr. Derek Knauss is just one more story that
21 completely contradicts the official narrative about the coronavirus
22 pandemic. If his conclusions are true, then we are truly being punked!
23
24 I’m a Clinical Lab Scientist, COVID-19 Is Fake,
25 Wake Up America!
26
27 I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed”
28 positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through
29 Koch’s postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any
30 of the 1500 samples.
31
32 What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not
33 a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test.
34
35 We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs
36 and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke
37 to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not
38 have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the
39 COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious.
40 The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart
41 disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune
42 system and they died.
43
44 I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab
45 tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single
46 viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample, I say there is
47 no Covid-19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19
48 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19
49 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral
50 genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.
51
52 With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever
53 isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve
54 ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.

Page 18
So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is
fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a
novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this
plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump.
Dr. Derek Knauss is a clinical lab specialist focussing on virology and immunology. He is based in
Southern California.
1 Article Source: Global Research

2
3
4 https://principia-scientific.com/even-cdc-now-admits-no-gold-standard-of-covid19-virus-isolate/
5
6 Even CDC Now Admits No ‘Gold Standard’ of COVID19 Virus Isolate | Principia Scientific
7 Intl. (principia-scientific.com)
8
9 Even CDC Now Admits No ‘Gold

10 Standard’ Of COVID19 Virus Isolate
11
12
13 https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-
14 cdc-says-it-isnt-available/
15
16 The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available. « Jon Rappoport's
17 Blog (nomorefakenews.com)
18
19 The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The
20 CDC says it isn’t available.
21
22
23 https://thefreedomarticles.com/10-reasons-sars-cov-2-imaginary-digital-theoretical-virus/
24
25 Theoretical Virus: 10 Reasons SARS-CoV-2 is an Digital Creation (thefreedomarticles.com)
26 Imaginary and Theoretical Virus
27 Published 2 weeks ago on January 28, 2021
28 QUOTE
29  THE STORY:
30 No record found: the SARS-CoV-2 virus that allegedly causes COVID has
31 still, to this date, never been isolated. Countless governments and
32 organizations worldwide have failed to produce evidence of its existence
33 when challenged.
34  THE IMPLICATIONS:
Page 19
1 The world has been shut down and people's lives have been decimated over a
2 lie and a superstition that could well be the biggest fraud ever perpetuated on
3 humanity as a whole.
4 END QUOTE
5
7
9 Imaginary and Theoretical Virus
10 Published 2 weeks ago on January 28, 2021
11 QUOTE
12
13 #1 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: The Virus Has Never
14 Been Isolated According to Koch’s Postulates or River’s
15 Postulates
16 We’ll start with this, because this is the cornerstone of the whole scam. All the
17 following information and evidence below stems from the fact the so-called
18 experts have never isolated and purified the virus according to the gold standard
19 of Koch’s postulates, or even the modified River’s Postulates. Koch’s postulates
20 are:
21 1. The microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease,
22 but not in healthy individuals.
23 2. The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in
24 culture.
25 3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism must

26 cause disease.
27 4. The microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental host, and
28 found to be identical to the original microorganism.
29 River’s postulates were proposed by Thomas M. River in 1973 to establish the
30 role of a specific virus as the cause of a specific disease. They are modifications
31 of Koch’s postulates. They are as follows:
32 1. The viral agent must be found either in the host’s (animal or plant) body fluids
33 at the time of disease or in cells showing lesions specific to that disease.

Page 20
1 2. The host material with the viral agent used to inoculate the healthy host (test
2 organism) must be free of any other microorganism.
3 3. The viral agent obtained from the infected host must produce the specific
4 disease in a suitable healthy host, and/or provide evidence of infection by
5 inducing the formation of antibodies specific to that agent.
6 4. Similar material (viral particle) from the newly infected host (test organism)
7 must be isolated and capable of transmitting the specific disease to other healthy
8 hosts.
9 Whichever set of postulates is used, SARS-CoV-2 fails the test. Dr. Andrew
10 Kaufman does a great job explaining why in this video. The coronavirus SARS-
11 CoV-2 (allegedly causing the disease COVID-19) has not been shown to be
12 present only in sick people and not in healthy ones. The virus has never been
13 isolated, which must be done with proper equipment such as electron
14 microscopes and which cannot be achieved through CT scans (as the Chinese
15 were using) and the flawed PCR test. The January 24th 2020 study published in
16 the New England Journal of Medicine entitled A Novel Coronavirus from
17 Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 describes how the scientists arrived at
18 the idea of COVID-19: they took lung fluid samples and extracted RNA from
19 them using the PCR test. It admits that the coronavirus failed Koch’s postulates:
20 END QUOTE
21
22 And, even now many scientist and specialist are making clear that they still do not fully
23 understand what the COVID is about and the CDC has admitted there is no GOLD STANDARD
24 COVID as it still has none, as I recently wrote about.
25
26 I may not have the qualifications those specialist advising the TGA may claim to have but in my
27 view using mere “common sense” would underline that the TGA statements are sheer and utter
28 nonsense. Having “clinical trials” to enforce a legal obligation to have a “VACCINATION
29 PASSPORT” may underline that the TGA approval is intended to be misused and abuse by the
30 Federal government and others to make this “clinical trials”
31 Compulsory.
32 As for “Provisional approval of this vaccine is valid for two years” in my view is also
33 utter and sheer nonsense. After all, where these are “clinical trials” then I view it should be
34 vary time limited, say months, and those pushing for the vaccinations must prove to be entitled
35 to have time extension of say months at the time. In particular, with so many adverse reactions
36 and numerous deaths the TGA in my view should have limited the approval to a limited number
37 of vaccines so as first to establish what, if any adverse issues may arise.
38

Page 21
1 My wife is 88 and has been living in fear since January 2020, not because of COVID but because
2 of the propaganda and the ongoing claims that people have to be vaccinated, etc. The last years
3 of her life has been so far destroyed that as she gave me the understanding was worse then what
4 she had to live through during WWII and later communism. With curfews and lockdowns she
5 was denied even to go shopping with me due to the rules applied and this all about a virus that
6 now turns out has no greater death then the flu/common cold. The CDC appears to have
7 conceded that the death rate was overblown by about 1600%. We get all those claims about
8 “cases” by what I consider idiots who regardless if they have any medical degree appear to me to
9 be charlatans as the “cases” are often based upon incorrect measurements such as too many
10 cycles, etc.
11
12 https://thevaccinereaction.org/vaccination/risk-failure-reports/
13 The Vaccine ReactionAn enlightened conversation about vaccination, health and
14 autonomy
15
16 This list numerous cases of people having adverse reaction even death within hours after
17 vaccination.
18
19
21
23
24 Imaginary and Theoretical

25 Virus
26 END QUOTE
27 “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available

28 for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study
29 conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA
30 were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full
31 length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known
32 titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a
33 suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM)
34 to mimic clinical specimen.” (pg.43)
35 #4 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: CDC Admitted They
36 Made a Digital Virus of 30,000 Base Pairs Using 37 Actual
37 Sample Base Pairs
38

Page 22
1 As covered in my previous article SARS-CoV-2: The Stitched Together,

2 Frankenstein Virus, the CDC has already admitted that SARS-CoV-2 is a
3 computer-generated digital virus, not a real living virus. As I wrote:
4 “In other words, it is a Frankenstein virus which has been
5 concocted and stitched together using genomic database sequences
6 (some viral, some not). It has never been properly purified and
7 isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived
8 from living tissue; instead, it’s just digitally assembled from a
9 computer database. In this paper, the CDC scientists state they took
10 just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs which means
11 that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is derived from actual
12 living samples or real bodily tissue. In other words, they took these
13 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in
14 the rest of the base pairs. This computer-generation step constitutes
15 scientific fraud.”
16 In this article In June Study CDC Scientists Make 2 COVID Admissions that
17 Destroy Official Narrative I reveal how the CDC admitted in their paper that
18 they extrapolated their make-believe virus. Here is the quote:
19 “Whole-Genome Sequencing
20 We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the
21 basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession
22 no. NC045512). We extracted nucleic acid from isolates and
23 amplified by using the 37 individual nested PCRs.”
24 Another way to say this is that the “virus” has been constructed using a
25 technique called de novo assembly which is a method for constructing genomes
26 from a large number of (short or long) DNA fragments, with no a
27 priori knowledge of the correct sequence or order of those fragments. You can
28 read more about it here.
29 END QUOTE
30
31 https://cormandrostenreview.com/cease-and-desist-order-fuellmich-drosten/
32

Page 23
1 RMAN-DROSTEN REVIEW REPORT

2 CURATED BY AN INTERNATIONAL
3 CONSORTIUM OF SCIENTISTS IN LIFE
4 SCIENCES (ICSLS)
5 QUOTE
6 Green Mango GmbH, represented by Nils Roth v. Prof
7 Dr. Christian Drosten
8 Dear Professor Drosten,
9 We hereby give notice that Green Mango GmbH, Bülowstrasse 56,
10 10783 Berlin, represented by its managing director, Mr. Nils Roth, has
11 commissioned us to represent its interests on the basis of the enclosed
12 power of attorney. Our client has suffered and continues to suffer
13 significant harm as a result of the grossly disproportionate measures
14 imposed to contain the COVID-19 pandemic without an evidence-based
15 foundation.
16 You are personally responsible for this harm because, as one of the
17 individuals who intervened significantly and decisively in the policy
18 deliberations, you stated facts which you knew to be false and still
19 continue to do so, and, also intentionally, you concealed, and continue to
20 conceal significant facts. In the name of and on behalf of our client, we
21 claim that you should rectify your erroneous contribution to policy
22 advice in connection with the COVID-19 crisis and compensate our
23 client for the harm he has already suffered.
24 In particular:
25 I. The basic assumptions of Corona-Politics
26 The measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic (if indeed it is a
27 pandemic) are based on the following assumptions:
28  SARS-CoV-2 is a completely new pathogen that has jumped from
29 animals to humans, is completely unknown to the human organism
30 (meaning that no one is immune) and it can therefore spread
31 exponentially.
32  This pathogen is so insidious that it can even be passed on by people
33 who have no symptoms themselves.
34  Therefore, the only solution is to diagnose the COVID-19 disease
35 (whether noticed or unnoticed in the population) by means of a PCR
36 test.
37  If the state does not intervene decisively, there is a risk of massive
38 mortality and a dramatic overload of intensive care capacities.
Page 24
1 The occurrence of infections can be monitored by expanding testing

2 capacity. Accordingly more than 1 million people in Germany are
3 currently being tested for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR week by week.
4 II. On the errors underlying these assumptions: the
5 five lockdown fallacies
6 Meanwhile, these assumptions are exhausted in a shallow narrative
7 based on several successive and interlocking false factual claims.
8 1 The first false claim: No basic immunity
9 Firstly, and without any evidence, is the assumption that the virus
10 jumped from animals to humans in Wuhan, China. To prove such a
11 zoonosis, other prevalence of the pathogen among humans would have
12 to be reliably excluded. It is not evident that this has been done. The
13 doubts about the zoonotic hypothesis accordingly also cast doubts about
14 the thesis that this is a completely new pathogen. It is precisely this
15 hypothesis that would have to be substantiated if it were claimed that no
16 one is immune to the virus. In contrast, you yourself have pointed out in
17 several episodes of your NDR podcast that SARS-CoV-2 is closely
18 related to the old SARS virus of 2003 (for example, in the podcast of
19 March 18, 2020, Coronavirus Update No. 16, transcript p. 3).
20 If SARS-CoV-2 were really an entirely new pathogen, it would be
21 inexplicable why (and especially in non-lockdown states) so many
22 people have survived the pandemic – a circumstance to which a high-
23 profile authors’ collective around the Nobel Laureate in chemistry,
24 Michael Levitt, has drawn attention (Udi Qimron/Uri Ga vish/Eyal
25 Shahar/Michael Levitt in Haaretz of
26 20.7.2020 https://www.dropbox.com/s/72hi9jfcqfct1n9/Haaretz-
27 20Jul20_ENGLISH%2012082020%20v3. pdf?dl=0). And it would also
28 be inexplicable why the Infection Fatality Rate is now demonstrably in
29 the range of a normal flu wave. This is proven by the meta-study by
30 John Ioannidis, which was published online in the WHO Bulletin in
31 October 2020
32 (https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf). But the
33 World Health Organisation, too, has itself meanwhile indirectly
34 conceded that the mortality is not higher than that of a normal flu. As it
35 is estimated there that (at the time of the relevant statement) 10% of the
36 world’s population, i.e. 780 million people, have been infected with
37 COVID-19 at some time, and that approximately 1,061,000 have died
38 from this disease, the estimated infection fatality rate is 0.14% (Kit
39 Knightly in Off Guardian, 8.10.2020). https://off-
40 guardian.org/2020/10/08/ who-accidentally-confirms-covid-is-no-more-
Page 25
1 dangerous-than-
2 flu/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=9f4e045500ae4e4062d41f84f1bf49d4f7b4929
3 d-1602442086-0-Aeu4umOETH4stqemIIA-
4 Qk9uKfr8ZGG5JqPW6PjLNpjCvsHlCzjwiUuc3-
5 gKjoBVnygh0e0qvTJPRu6QCs).
6 Finally, the long incubation period of up to 14 days also indicates that
7 the human immune system is already prepared for the pathogen. Beda
8 Stadler pointed this out in an article in the Swiss Weltwoche (re-
9 published at https://www.achgut.com/
10 artikel/corona_aufarbeitung_warum_alle_ falsch_lagen).
11 The authors Udi Qimron/Uri Gavish/Eyal Shahar/Michael Levitt, who
12 are cited above, (https://www.dropbox.com/s/72hi9jfcqfct1n9/Haaretz-
13 20Jul20_ENGLISH%2012082020%20v3.pdf?dl=0), drew attention to
14 the fact that pre-immunity already exists and that, due to this, no more
15 than 20% of the population become infected with SARS CoV-2 in any
16 of the countries studied. Claims to the effect that nobody is immune and
17 that anyone can become infected have no basis in fact.
18 In case any misunderstanding arises: It is not disputed here that there can
19 be severe and fatal courses of COVID-19. But the quantitative extent of
20 the threat has been dramatically overestimated. It is therefore misleading
21 if you speak of exponential kinetics (such as in the NDR podcast of
22 March 18, 2020, Coronavirus Update No. 16, transcript p. 2 as well as in
23 the NDR podcast of May 28, 2020, Coronavirus Update No. 44,
24 transcript p. 5) or exponential multiplication (as seen, for example, in the
25 NDR podcast of March 19, 2020, Coronavirus Update No. 17, transcript
26 p. 6 as well as in the NDR podcast of May 19, 2020, Coronavirus
27 Update No. 42, transcript p. 2). The virus may indeed affect those who
28 are in the vicinity of a diseased person. But exponential multiplication
29 would mean that all, or at least many, of these people would in turn
30 become ill. However, this is precisely not happening. For those whose
31 immune system can cope with the pathogen, further spreading stops. It is
32 therefore also not true that the disease can increase exponentially if we
33 are not in lockdown (as asserted by you in the NDR podcast of April 7,
34 2020, Coronavirus Update No. 29, transcript p. 4).
35 2. The second false claim: symptomless risk of infection
36 The assumption that a person can fall ill with COVID-19 completely
37 unnoticed and pass the virus on to other people similarly unnoticed, and
38 without obvious symptoms, is without evidence and is only supported by
39 almost frighteningly weak studies.
40 This false factual claim began with a case report in the New England
41 Journal of Medicine on March 5, 2020 (NEJM 382;10), in which you
Page 26
1 and others claimed that a symptomless Chinese businesswoman had met

2 four employees of a local company in Munich who all subsequently
3 contracted COVID-19. In Wuhan, they said, this lady then tested
4 positive for SARS-CoV-2. This was the ultimate proof that symptomless
5 people could also be contagious. This case report had already been
6 published as a preprint on January 30, 2020. On February 3, 2020, a
7 commentary was published pointing out that the lady from China did in
8 fact have symptoms and only suppressed them with the help of
9 medication (Kai Kupferschmidt on February 3, 2020
10 at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/ paper-non-symptomatic-
11 patient-transmitting- coronavirus-wrong). This was the result of
12 conversations with this lady – conversations that the authors of the case
13 report, including yourself, had omitted to mention.
14 Nevertheless, the case report was printed in the New England Journal of
15 Medicine on March 5, 2020. It constitutes outright scientific fraud that
16 this case report was not immediately retracted after the error became
17 known. A follow-up study, which then appeared, again with your
18 collaboration, in The Lancet on May 15, 2020, (Lancet Infect Dis
19 2020;20;920-928), in which the “outbreak cluster” in the Munich
20 company was to be traced epidemiologically, then suddenly brought to
21 light the conclusive finding that the lady from China had been in contact
22 with her parents who were sick with COVID-19 shortly before her trip to
23 Munich – a finding that had been confirmed in the case report of March
24 5, 2020. The study in The Lancet of May 15, 2020 contains numerous
25 inconsistencies, both in itself and in relation to the case report of
26 February 3, 2020, which have already been addressed elsewhere
27 (https://www.corodok.de/die-legende- uebertragung/).
28 The Robert Koch Institute itself admits in its SARS CoV-2 case report
29 (as of Nov. 27, 2020) that asymptomatic contagion plays only a minor
30 role (https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/
31 InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Steckbrief.html;jsessionid=E17D33B
32 AD7D5
33 5D3449CE3729AFCD4104.internet052#doc13776792bodyText2). In
34 this regard, it refers to a meta-study that, after evaluating hundreds of
35 papers, ultimately concludes that the evidence would have to be much
36 more robust (Oyungerel Byambasuren et al. in Official Journal of
37 Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease
38 Canada, https://jammi.utpjournals.press/doi/pdf /10.3138/jammi-2020-
39 0030).
40 In addition, the Robert Koch Institute considers it possible that the
41 pathogen could be passed on 1-2 days before symptom onset, but refers
Page 27
1 only to a Chinese study and a study from Singapore, both of which

2 suffer from weaknesses, including the fact that other prevalence could
3 not be excluded. The assumption of a presymptomatic contagion, which
4 the Robert Koch Institute does not mention, has been massively
5 challenged in the literature (Mark Slifka/Lina Gao in Nature
6 Medicine https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5 [2020]). The
7 immunologist Beda Stadler, Professor Emeritus at the University of
8 Bern, pointed out in a highly regarded article in the Swiss weekly,
9 Weltwoche, that the idea that viruses can multiply uncontrollably in the
10 human body without the individual noticing this is immunologically
11 unthinkable.
12 However, it is precisely this uncontrolled multiplication that creates the
13 risk of infection in the first place (second publication
14 at https://www.achgut.com/artikel/corona_aufarbeitung_warum_
15 alle_falsch_lagen).
16 It can hardly come as a surprise that not a single asymptomatic
17 transmission of SARS CoV-2 was detected for the Corona outbreak in
18 Wuhan (Shiyi Gao et al. in (2020) 11:5917
19 | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w).
20 The false claim that a person can pass on the virus without symptoms is
21 particularly perfidious, because it corrodes society: everyone sees in his
22 fellow man only a highly dangerous virus spreader and reacts to this
23 with disgust, aggression or at least with fear and panic. Since even
24 schoolchildren are indoctrinated by parents and teachers, massive
25 behavioral and developmental disorders are already foreseeable. You
26 will also be held liable for this.
27 3. The third false claim: PCR-based diagnostics
28 Without the lie of a symptom-free risk of infection, no one would have
29 come up with the idea of testing even perfectly healthy people for
30 SARS-CoV-2 using PCR. In reality, PCR-based diagnostics are fraught
31 with so many sources of error that it was downright irresponsible to
32 introduce them for symptomless people:
33  A PCR test cannot distinguish between lifeless viral debris from
34 surviving infection, on the one hand, and from viruses capable of
35 reproducing, on the other. In this situation, any mass testing of
36 asymptomatic people will have fatal consequences: Since the vast
37 majority of COVID-19 infections are inconsequential, a large number of
38 people will be tested who are perfectly healthy and whose immune
39 systems have coped with the pathogen, but who then carry these lifeless
40 fragments. As will be seen, this is a source of error that will become
Page 28
1 apparent all by itself in the coming weeks and months. This source of
2 error will not change even if your assertion in the podcast of September
3 29, 2020, that nevertheless with lifeless viruses the full virus genome is
4 still detectable, were true.
5  No test is 100% accurate. At low prevalence, even minor deficiencies

6 in the specificity of the test system used are enough to noticeably
7 diminish any beneficial predictive value of a positive test result. Even
8 the German Minister of Health, Jens Spahn, has acknowledged this,
9 namely in an ARD interview of 14. June 2020.
10 Nevertheless, testing continues en-masse – despite the continued low
11 prevalence of COVID-19. And not all test systems used are equally
12 specific – if only because nowhere is it prescribed what the minimum
13 specificity of such a system must be in order to be allowed to be used at
14 all. An example of this is an incident that came to light in Augsburg,
15 Germany, in which 58 of a cohort of 60 people tested falsely positive.
16 And this happened close to the time of the lockdown decision of the
17 Conference of Minister Presidents. Such decisions are made on the basis
18 of incorrectly determined case numbers and therefore with far-reaching
19 consequences.
20  If the test system only begins detection after a large number of
21 replication cycles, the viral load is so low that active infection is ruled
22 out. In the NDR podcast of May 7, 2020, you yourself referred to a study
23 according to which a patient is considered “less infectious” above 25
24 cycles. In fact, the authors of a Canadian study failed to identify any
25 replicable virus beyond 24 cycles (Jared Bullard et al. in Clinical
26 Infectious Diseases, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ ciaa638). Nevertheless,
27 when the new case numbers are added up again, nowhere is it checked at
28 which Ct value the cut-off was set in the respective positive test case.
29 This makes the result of a PCR test highly susceptible to manipulation –
30 and thus susceptible to political influence when high case numbers are
31 “needed” in order to intimidate the population. In any case, the values
32 determined on the basis of a PCR test are not a sufficient basis for a
33 complete shutdown of public life and interference with people’s liberties
34 on an unprecedented scale.
35  A PCR test is not capable of distinguishing mere contamination from

36 infection. As long as the viruses remain on the mucous membranes and
37 do not enter the cells of the body, a person is only contaminated, but not
38 infected. In this case, the viruses do not replicate and therefore do not
Page 29
1 pose a risk of infection. Nevertheless, a PCR test will deliver a positive

2 result for such people. You yourself pointed out this problem in an
3 interview with Wirtschaftswoche in 2014.
4  The significance of a positive PCR test also depends on which and how
5 many primers are searched for. The less specific these are for SARS-
6 CoV-2, the lower this significance.
7 Conclusion: a positive PCR test is not the same as an infection. We don’t
8 know what happened in all the particular testing-labs. It is not surprising
9 that Mike Yeadon, former Chief Scientific Officer for Respiratory
10 Research at Pfizer, strongly advises against the use of PCR for the
11 diagnosis of COVID-19 in a recent article
12 (https://lockdownstics.org/lies- damned-lies- and-health-statistics- the-
13 deadly-danger-of-false-positives/).
14 And yet every positive test is included in the statistics of the Robert
15 Koch Institute as an alleged “new infection” and thus in the very metric
16 on which political decisions are based.
17 A further complicating factor is that if a person is tested several times in
18 rapid succession, each positive test result is declared to be a “new
19 infection”.
20 For this very reason, PCR tests are not only unsuitable for individual
21 diagnostics, but also not even for screening. The only decisive factor
22 must be how many people become ill, how many have to be
23 hospitalized, how many have to be treated in intensive care and how
24 many have to be ventilated. The instrument for reliably assessing these
25 events has long existed at the Robert Koch Institute, namely in the area
26 of influenza surveillance: the Sentinel Program (see Section 13 (2)
27 IfSG). It is incomprehensible why this is not also used to a much greater
28 extent for COVID-19. Friedrich Pürner, the head of the Aichach-
29 Friedberg public health department (who has since been transferred),
30 recently called for the Sentinel instruments to be used for COVID-19
31 surveillance.
32 4. The fourth false claim: the menace of overload of the
33 health care systems
34 Model calculations to the effect that millions of intensive care patients
35 and hundreds of thousands of deaths were to be feared in Germany alone
36 have never come true. And the politicians themselves apparently did not
37 believe in the impending apocalypse in the healthcare system. How else
38 could it be explained that the lockdown went into effect on March 23,
39 2020, and then on March 24, 2020, just one day later, it was reported
40 that Germany was accepting COVID-19 patients from France and Italy
Page 30
1 (https://www.aerzteblatt.de/news/111286/German-hospitals-are-
2 accepting-COVID-19- patients-from-Italy-and-France).
3 Apparently, at no point did we have to worry about overwhelming our
4 healthcare system. That said, as the summer progressed, the Corona
5 measures became more and more divorced from their actual
6 argumentative foundation. There was no sign of an overload of the
7 healthcare system. On the contrary, the clinics suffered from a lack of
8 capacity utilization because essential medical services were not provided
9 for other patients for fear there might be a big rush of COVID-19
10 patients at some point. Doctors and nursing staff were put on short-time
11 work. If you look at the DIVI intensive care register and compare the
12 daily reports from 21.7.2020 and 21.11.2020, you will see that on
13 21.7.2020 there were still over 32,000 intensive care beds in Germany in
14 total – i.e. occupied and unoccupied together – whereas on 21.11.2020
15 there were no longer even 28,000. How can anyone believe that a
16 government – which you played a key role in advising – is trying to
17 protect us from an epidemic by cutting more than one-eighth of all
18 intensive care capacity in the middle of a pandemic?
19 If hospitals are sounding the alarm about overcrowding, it is not because
20 of a “new and insidious” virus, but because our hospital system reaches
21 its capacity limits every year as soon as the flu season hits:
22 This was the headline in BILD on March 12, 2018: +++Hospitals
23 overcrowded +++Even doctors infected + + + Already 39 dead+++
24 Flu SHA in Leipzig’s clinics.
25 Doctors: “Flu wave exceeds anything ever seen before”
26 https://www.bild.de/regional/leipzig/grippe/grippe-gau-in-leipzigs-
27 kliniken-55075602.bild.html Already on 19.02.2013 one could read in
28 Die WELT the headline “Flu wave has Cologne firmly in its grip”
29
30 “Bed shortage in Cologne hospitals. Due to the many flu patients, the
31 intensive care units are completely overcrowded. At times, the hospitals
32 are so overloaded that they can no longer accept new patients.
33 Operations have to be postponed due to the tense situation.”
34 https://www.welt.de/regionales/koeln/article113760346/Grippewelle-
35 hat-Koeln-fest-im-Griff.html
36
37 And even shortly before the start of the “pandemic”, on 11.02.2020
38 (sic!), the North German Broadcasting Corporation (NDR) drew
39 attention to the catastrophic situation of intensive care units in Bremen
40 and Lower Saxony. Due to considerable bottlenecks, clinics had to “sign
41 off” again and again and also over longer periods of time resulting in
Page 31
1 their Emergency Room service being closed for ambulances. Between

2 2018 and 2019, the situation became even worse.
3 One reason for the increasing bottlenecks is apparently the shortage of
4 staff. If there is a shortage of personnel, beds are permanently closed.
5 According to Panorama 3 research, up to a third of the available
6 intensive care capacity cannot be used in some hospitals due to a lack of
7 the necessary intensive care staff. Bed closures in intensive care are a
8 nationwide problem, according to the German Hospital Association.
9 Apparently, the minimum staffing that has been in effect since January
10 2019 has exacerbated the problem at some hospitals. In view of the
11 17,000 unfilled positions, the German Hospital Association considers
12 the new limits “highly problematic”. The lower limits lead to
13 “additional care capacities being discontinued and the creation of care
14 bottlenecks” says Georg Baum, Managing Director of the German
15 Hospital Association (DKG).
16 A hospital in Lower Saxony describes the situation as follows: “Bed
17 blockages can occur and patients can be turned away. The emergency
18 service then has to cope with long travel times to those hospitals that are
19 ready to receive patients.” The consequences of the tense situation are
20 not only long travel times but also the cancellation of planned
21 operations because emergencies have to be prioritised.”
22 https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/Immer-mehr-
23 Intensivstationen-ueberlastet-,intensivpflege106.html
24
25 In short, nothing has changed in the findings about the state of our
26 healthcare system to date. Worse still: Despite a supposed pandemic, the
27 same approach in the area of intensive care has been blithely continued,
28 and instead of taking countermeasures here, we hear from advisors like
29 you that the only panacea is the complete shutdown of social life.
30 Let’s now look abroad: Overloading of healthcare systems and excess
31 mortality have only occurred in those regions that have always had to
32 struggle with the same problems anyway and in which wrong political
33 decisions or serious errors in medication have contributed to the
34 worsening of the crisis. This is particularly true for Italy. The horror
35 images from television provided the German public with a distorted
36 picture of the conditions there. In reality, panic making by the media and
37 hasty political decisions had driven patients into the clinics and nursing
38 staff out of the clinics and nursing homes. And all this is – as the public
39 prosecutor’s investigations that are now taking place there have shown –
40 the result of a targeted intervention by the WHO for the purpose of
41 creating horror images for the rest of the world (motto: “see where it
Page 32
1 leads if you don’t stick to the rules like the disciplined Germans”) by
2 appointing a WHO state administrator who also did not shy away from
3 falsifying data in pandemic plans. A WHO report outlining some of
4 these circumstances was withdrawn when it became clear that it showed
5 that a pandemic plan purportedly from 2016 was from 2006 and the date
6 had been falsified. https://www.dors.it/documentazi
7 one/testo/202005/COVID-19-Italy-response.pdf
8 5. The fifth false claim: Restriction on freedom can be
9 beneficial
10 Finally, the assumption that individual or collective restrictions on
11 liberty had any positive effect on management of the pandemic is in no
12 way tenable. Rather, the opposite is the case.
13 This applies first of all to the widespread closure of retail stores and of
14 educational and leisure facilities in March 2020. Figure 4 on page 14 of
15 the Robert Koch Institute’s Epidemiological Bulletin No. 17/2020,
16 which traces the development of the R value, clearly shows that it had
17 already fallen below 1 before March 23, 2020.
18 Stefan Homburg had pointed this out early and rightly (see for example
19 his tweet of
20 28.6.2020 https://twitter.com/shomburg/status/1277197624186208257?l
21 ang=en as well as his guest article in Die WELT of
22 21.4.2020, https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/plus207392523/
23 Uebersterblichkeit-sinkt-Fuer-denLockdown-government-runs-out-of-
24 arguments.htmlde/wirtschaft/plus207392523/Uebersterblichkeit-sinkt-
25 Fuer-den Lockdown-government-runs-out-of- arguments.html).
26 The Robert Koch Institute’s attempt to explain this development by
27 referring to an expansion of test capacities went up in a puff of smoke.
28 Clarity can be obtained by putting this graph in relation to the test
29 figures (see especially for the development in the summer months:
30 Daily Situation Report on COVID-19, Sept. 30, 2020, p. 10). In early
31 2020, there was little testing and little was found. In the first half of
32 March, more and more testing was conducted and more and more was
33 found. After that, testing was at a consistently high level and less and
34 less was found.
35 This can only mean: Until mid-March, there wa a considerable number
36 of unreported cases. The virus had long since arrived in Germany
37 without us noticing it. And by the time we had noticed it, it was already
38 on its way out. Until well into September 2020, the mass testing did not
39 reveal anything more than the usual error rate. The decline in the number
40 of infections in the spring was in no way due to the Non-Pharmaceutical

Page 33
1 (lockdown) Measures, but was solely due to the fact that it was warmer
2 again in the spring.
3 If lockdown measures were to have had any effect, the countries that
4 imposed the most severe measures must have had the greatest success.
5 However, such a correlation has not been confirmed in country
6 comparisons. On the contrary, there are now numerous studies proving
7 the ineffectiveness of the containment measures. And even the WHO
8 published a 91-page paper in October showing how ineffective such
9 measures (school closures, contact quarantines, social distancing, etc.)
10 are in combating influenza. And of all things, this is supposed to save us
11 from COVID-19!
12 The study from Imperial College that appeared in Nature in June 2020
13 and concluded that the lockdown saved up to 3.1 million lives (Seth
14 Flaxman et al in Nature 584, 257-261. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7)
15 suffers from primitive errors that Stefan Homburg and
16 Christof Kuhbandner revealingly pointed out in a November 5, 2020,
17 paper in Frontiers in Medicine
18 (https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.580361). That Nature study is not
19 credible because it consists solely of an obvious attempt to justify its
20 own earlier horror predictions.
21 It is striking that mortality in numerous countries jumped precisely in the
22 time frame
23 directly after the imposition of collective restrictions on liberty. This has
24 been elaborated in detail by John
25 Pospichal (https://medium.com/@JohnPospichal/questions-for-
26 lockdown- apologists-32a9bbf2e247). If we cannot demonstrably hold
27 COVID-19 responsible for this, the focus falls on the collateral damage
28 of the restrictions on liberty: dementia patients dying for lack of care,
29 demonstrably fewer strokes and heart attacks being adequately attended
30 to, discovery of the bodies of people who had barricaded themselves in
31 their homes and were literally rotting away in their own apartments,
32 reportedly significant increases in suicides. The mass testing leads to
33 fatal misallocation of resources by the health authorities, because they
34 fail to fulfill their other tasks. For example, drinking water control has
35 come to a complete standstill; there are more Legionella deaths than
36 before.
37
38 All those who have campaigned for cuts in public life, who have imposed
39 and enforced such cuts, have thousands of lives on their conscience,
40 including you, Prof. Drosten.

Page 34
1 If the upcoming winter should indeed bring to light a large number of

2 medically relevant respiratory diseases, this will not be due to the danger
3 of COVID-19, but to the Corona policy: Social distancing, preached
4 early in the year, keeps people from properly exercising their immune
5 systems. The bombardment with panic reports from home and abroad
6 has also done its part: fear has a negative effect on the human immune
7 system. Immunosuppression has never been a suitable instrument for
8 fighting infections.
9 If one wants to impose lockdown measures from today’s perspective, it
10 must be added that the original logic behind these measures (flattening
11 the curve) has become obsolete due to the now endemic spread of the
12 virus in the population. As the epidemiologist Gérard Krause rightly
13 points out: The virus is already everywhere anyway
14 (https://www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/corona- massnahmen-wie-sinnvoll-
15 is-die-sperrstunde-a-7d5c63b1-05f4-4ab1-bbf6-
16 b820553ff3ba?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-en-DE). It can’t be
17 stopped.
18 6. The interlocking of the deliberately false lockdown
19 claims
20 It is remarkable how conspicuously the lies behind the Corona measures
21 are interlocked and interdependent. It is important to take a look at
22 this, because in this way we can see that the entire measures are
23 designed to be perpetuated without any regard for the actual incidence
24 of infection.
25  It is only because one assumes, against better knowledge, that a human
26 being could infect others with SARS-CoV-2 without being ill
27 themselves, that mass testing for this pathogen is being carried out.
28 Every single one of us, so the doctrine goes, could be the unrecognized
29 carrier of the deadly virus.
30  Now, in autumn and winter, when all respiratory pathogens increase
31 their activity again, SARS-CoV-2 will also affect many people. For a
32 significant number, the virus will simply sit on the mucous membranes
33 and will not penetrate the cells of the body at all. In many others, the
34 virus will enter the body’s cells, but will be overwhelmed and killed by
35 the immune system. These groups of people will form the clear majority.
36 In all of them, positive test results will occur, and in the case of those
37 infected without any adverse consequences, for up to three months after
38 infection. When these test positive, they will, against better knowledge,
39 be counted as “new infections”. The number of people whose immune
40 system has killed the virus will increase over the course of the cold
Page 35
1 season. Therefore, the number of people who test positive will also
2 increase – without any of the resources in the healthcare system being
3 used.
4  The aggregate of “new infections” will therefore increase and be used
5 by politicians to justify further interventions. Because, against better
6 knowledge, positive tests are equated with new infections, the increase
7 in “new infections” declared in this way will in turn feed the lie that the
8 virus is highly contagious and that no one is immune leading to the
9 imminent collapse of the healthcare system.
10 The way the infection situation is currently being portrayed, it is
11 purposefully designed to ensure that the lockdown will never end. If this
12 kind of data processing and data presentation is not stopped forthwith,
13 we will be locked down until well into next spring. Everyone, including
14 you, can imagine what this will mean not only for the economy, but also
15 for the health of the population in general, which has already been
16 described above.
17 III. Your personal responsibility
18 You yourself have broadcast to the world the essential parts of the
19 misinformation listed above:
20 1. On the question of basic immunity
21 In your statements in the NDR podcasts, you pointed out the genetic
22 relationship of SARS-CoV-2 with the old SARS virus. You also know
23 that the matter of how great the immunity is in the population depends
24 on how well known a pathogen is to the human organism.
25 When you then claim in the NDR podcast of March 18, 2020, that
26 Germany is in a rising wave of exponential growth kinetics (Coronavirus
27 Update No. 16, transcript p. 2), and you use comparable formulations in
28 other podcasts (see above), then this is quite arbitrary. It has been clear
29 to you that the alleged novelty of the virus and the alleged lack of
30 immunity (i.e., a prerequisite for exponential spread) requires a high
31 amount of evidence to be available. Blue sky claims made without
32 evidence legally fulfill the serious offence of malicious aforethought.
33 It is noticeable that you leave no stone unturned to dispel the – justified
34 – hope of people for basic immunity. This applies first of all to herd
35 immunity (see, for example, NDR podcast of June 24, 2020,
36 Coronavirus Update No. 49, transcript p. 9: We are still very far away
37 from herd immunity; NDR podcast of May 5, 2020, Coronavirus update
38 No. 38, transcript p. 2: 70% would have to be immune to achieve herd
39 immunity, and even then the infections would not stop, that would only
40 be the peak, which, however – you then concede after all – could also be
Page 36
1 reached at less than 70% depending on other factors; NDR podcast of

2 April 20, 2020, Coronavirus Update No. 33: we are not at all close to
3 herd immunity). However, it also applies to T-cell immunity: here you
4 refer to different research results, but you do not consider the thesis of a
5 30% T-cell immunity from an earlier encounter with other human
6 coronaviruses to be correct (NDR podcast of October 13, 2020,
7 Coronavirus Update No. 60, transcript p. 7). In the same place (ibid.
8 transcript p. 2) you claim that we are not immunologically protected
9 against the virus. You ignore contrary findings known to you, which
10 indicate that basic immunity has been present for a long time.
11 2. On the subject of the danger of symptomless
12 infection
13 In this respect you are charged with particularly serious and far-reaching
14 misconduct. To put it bluntly: After you yourself had recognized that the
15 supposedly symptomless source of infection from China did in fact have
16 symptoms, there would have been only one adequate reaction for you
17 and your co-authors: You should have immediately withdrawn the case
18 study. That study should never have been published as a letter to the
19 editor in the New England Journal of Medicine. The study has since
20 been cited over 1,000 times. You have thus contributed significantly to
21 creating the appearance of evidence that does not exist in reality.
22 Obviously, you have stuck to your deliberate misstatement that people
23 can infect each other with SARS CoV-2 without any symptoms. On ZDF
24 on 1st November 2020 (https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/pano-
25 rama/coronavirus-drosten-ostern-100.html) you said that everyone
26 should behave as if they were infected themselves and wanted to protect
27 others from themselves while, at the same time, one should act as if the
28 other person
29 were infected and should protect oneself from them. In this way you
30 stoked up the very attitude of mind that is increasingly leading to
31 aggression and rage: everyone sees in other people a spreader of the
32 virus. And you obviously think that’s perfectly fine.
33 3. About the PCR test
34 Until recently, you have defended the current practice of diagnosing
35 COVID-19 by means of a PCR test. You know a lot about laboratory
36 medicine.
37 It cannot have escaped your attention that a PCR test cannot distinguish
38 between replicable viruses and lifeless virus fragments and cannot
39 distinguish between contamination and infection.
40 In connection with the Ct-value, you admitted in the NDR podcast of 1st
41 September 2020 (Coronavirus Update No. 54, transcript p.15), that the
Page 37
1 significance of the test result depends on the viral load. However, you
2 ruled out a cut-off value of Ct = 30 as the upper cycle limit on the
3 grounds of differences in quality of the test reagents and the machines.
4 You yourself concede that a positive PCR test does mean a real
5 infection. The consequence is that one should not draw any diagnostic
6 conclusions from such a test result, but then you refuse to say this. And
7 how do your statements from September 2020 relate to those of 7 May
8 2020 (Coronavirus Update No. 39, transcript p. 3), when you still
9 referred to a study that advocated Ct = 25 as the “magic limit”?
10 You cast doubt on the false positive rate with the following thought
11 experiment (see Berliner Morgenpost, 2 September
12 2020, https://www.morgenpost.de/vermischtes/
13 article230318584/Falsch-positive-Ergebnisse-bei-ausgeweiteten-Corona-
14 Tests.html): “In most cases a second test is done, and therefore the
15 specificity is 99.99%, and a false positive result is as good as
16 impossible.” You are deliberately misleading politicians and the public.
17 The second test is carried out precisely because you want to exclude a
18 false positive result. This means that if the second test is negative, then
19 the whole test result is also negative or at best without significance, but
20 in no case positive. However, it follows that if the second test is a false
21 positive, then the whole test is false positive. It is the same if the first
22 test is false positive and the second is true positive. Both tests must be
23 positive in order for the whole test result to be positive. And
24 therefore, both tests must be true positives, for the whole test result to be
25 accepted as a true positive.
26 4. Your lockdown recommendations
27 Already in the podcast on March 18, 2020 (Coronavirus Update No. 16,
28 transcript p. 2) you called for a drastic and decisive intervention (which
29 could only be a political one) to stop the alleged exponential rate of
30 spread of SARS-CoV-2. And shortly before the second lockdown was
31 decided on October 28, 2020, you followed up in the NDR podcast of
32 October 27, 2020 (Coronavirus Update No. 62): in view of the case
33 numbers, you recommended that politicians should impose a temporary
34 lockdown (ibid. transcript p. 5); this would be enforced above a certain
35 case number (ibid. transcript p. 6). You attribute the low incidence
36 figures of today to the lockdown in spring, although you know exactly
37 that even the figures and graphs of the Robert Koch Institute do not
38 support this analysis.
39 These “case numbers” are nothing more than a product of the PCR tests,
40 which are diagnostically useless and which come about to a very
41 considerable extent by testing ever more and more. Even allowing the
Page 38
1 fact that the percentage of positive test results has risen in the last few
2 weeks, in view of the susceptibility to manipulation of the Ct-number
3 (Cycle threshold value), this does not mean that the number of cases has
4 increased. Your own presentation in the podcast of May 7, 2020, shows
5 that you know exactly how much the significance of a PCR test drops
6 when the number of cycles increases. Nonetheless, you have
7 recommended the second lockdown without in the least questioning the
8 causal origins of the case numbers.
9 So you know perfectly well that the closure of workplaces, which
10 threatens the viability of companies, is being mandated on the basis of
11 pure hot air – namely on the basis of figures which must be seen as
12 completely unscientific and are not adjusted in any way for the sources
13 of error. The same applies to the introduction of other restrictions on
14 freedom, such as the introduction of curfews or the tightening of the
15 mask requirement when the “Corona traffic light” jumps to red. And you
16 are not trying to stop this misguided development; on the contrary, you
17 are fueling it. In an interview with DIE ZEIT on October 6, 2020, you
18 defended the senseless adding up of absolute case numbers and the
19 political determination of the completely arbitrary 7-day incidence
20 values, because one could recognize the development early on the basis
21 of the “new infections” (https://www.zeit.de/wissen/2020-
22 10/christiandrosten-corona-massnahmen-neuinfektionen-herbst-winter-
23 covid-19/komplettansicht).
24 Since you have chosen to falsely equate a positive test with a new
25 infection, this statement can only be understood in such a way that you
26 prefer this interpretation. In this case, however, an increase in “new
27 infections” – i.e. the number of positive test results – does not mean
28 anything at all when it comes to the incidence of infection.
29 The overall truth is quite different: It is not the virus but only test results
30 that are spreading exponentially. The virus itself cannot broadly spread
31 in the community – precisely because the spread has long since
32 progressed and basic immunity has long been present in the population.
33 The collateral damage of the Corona measures cannot have escaped you.
34 By recommending a renewed lockdown on October 27, 2020, without
35 any consideration of other threats to human life, you are personally
36 responsible for all the damage caused by the Corona measures. In the
37 NDR podcast of May 14, 2020 (Coronavirus Update No. 41, transcript p.
38 4), you expressed an assessment on this that is so cynical that we quote
39 here your own words:
40 “These few tens of thousands, that would be something like a severe flu
41 season in terms of pure deaths. But I think that would be compared to a
Page 39
1 significantly greater excess mortality over other years. That’s the

2 collateral damage in health because people don’t go to the hospital
3 because of the illness. That is, in all scenarios, we would not have a
4 comparability with seasonal flu here either, but these are the pure cases
5 directly caused by the virus. And that’s not what we’re recording in the
6 excess mortality of influenza. We would have much higher excess
7 mortality.”
8 In plain language, this means that not only do you know that there is
9 collateral damage, but you have the audacity to count those who die
10 because of corona measures as COVID-19 deaths.
11 You belong to the signatories of the Leopoldina paper of December 8,
12 2020, which recommended a hard lockdown after Christmas. The very
13 description of the action required shows that you, as well as all the co-
14 signatories, have completely abandoned the principles of evidence-based
15 science:
16 “More people died with coronavirus in the last 7 days than died on the
17 roads in 2019.”
18 The key thing is the preposition “with.” The preposition “from” is not
19 used Thus, the authors of the paper themselves admit that they are
20 talking about deaths for which SARS-CoV-2 as a cause has not been
21 proven. However, in the context of the rest of the text in this paragraph –
22 clinics at breaking point, health departments overburdened, etc. – clever
23 framing is used to create the impression that the problems in clinics have
24 something to do with COVID-19. That this is not the case has already
25 been explained under point 4 of this letter. Such an approach is light
26 years away from the requirement of informed policy advice. And insofar
27 as the paper compares the “new infections” between Germany and
28 Ireland, this is once again based on positive PCR tests which, without
29 sufficient data to interpret the test results, say nothing at all about the
30 incidence of infection.
31 You had touted the alleged benefits of a temporary mini-lockdown in the
32 podcast of October 27, 2020 (Coronavirus Update No. 62, transcript p. 5
33 f.): such a measure could prove to be a circuit breaker to make up
34 ground lost to the virus. Even at that time, it must have been clear to
35 everyone that this would not be the end of the story – precisely because
36 the aggregate case numbers from mass testing will always simulate an
37 infection event that does not even begin to correspond to reality. Now,
38 according to your Leopoldina paper, a tighter lockdown until January 10,
39 2021, is supposed to bring salvation. Who is supposed to believe that the
40 artificially generated infection figures will fall again after January 11,
41 2020?
Page 40
1 In the Epidemiological Bulletin No. 45/2020 (p. 20), the Robert Koch
2 Institute admitted that, for weeks and increasingly, non-evaluated swab
3 samples have been accumulating in the laboratories – which is hardly
4 surprising in view of the senseless mass testing of symptomless people.
5 They will be evaluated later in order to continue generating positive test
6 results, on the basis of which the population will then be further harassed
7 and the German economy driven to its final ruin.
8 You co-signed the Leopoldina paper of December 8, 2020. You share
9 full responsibility for its contents. In reality, your lockdown
10 recommendations were never designed to promise people liberation
11 after weeks of deprivation. With their deliberately false advice, they are
12 purposefully driving us all – worldwide, not just in Germany – into
13 permanent lockdown in the sense of deliberately evil harm, and you will
14 be held fully liable for this under criminal and civil law.
15 5. Causality and attribution
16 You cannot escape your personal responsibility for all this harm by
17 pointing out that it was not you, but elected politicians and duly
18 appointed authorities who decided on these ruinous measures. Rather,
19 the damage can be attributed to you throughout and is a direct result of
20 your work. It cannot have escaped you, and it has not escaped you, that
21 your advice decisively influences policymakers and that those
22 policymakers consult you because they themselves are unable to
23 properly assess the risk posed by SARS-CoV-2. Providing such
24 authoritative input is the genuine task of any policy consultant.
25 The penetrating power of your false claims about the Corona situation is
26 particularly evident in the courts: what comes out of your mouth is
27 adopted unchecked. On July 28, when really no significant prevalence of
28 SARS-CoV-2 was detectable any more, the upper administrative court
29 (OVG) Münster (13 B 675/20.NE) told us, stubbornly, that it was
30 necessary to prevent an overload of the healthcare systems. Then again
31 on December 4, 2020, the OVG Bremen (1 B 385/20) tried to make us
32 believe that asymptomatically infected persons are particularly
33 dangerous. These two examples are depressing:
34 No one – so far – is protecting the population in general and companies
35 in particular from the misinformation that underlies the lockdown
36 policy.
37 You, as the one whose advice those in power listen to most, are
38 personally liable for this misinformation, in both criminal and civil law.
39 Your personal responsibility for the harm described above will not
40 change even if a judicial hearing reveals that policymakers deliberately
41 misused the Corona crisis to push an agenda that had nothing to do with
Page 41
1 containing an (alleged) pandemic, under the guise of protecting against

2 infection, and that those decision-makers were merely drawing on your
3 professional expertise for the apparent legitimization of their actions in
4 order to conceal their real intentions. In this case, by making the above
5 allegations, you have aided and abetted reprehensible damage to
6 numerous persons and wicked damage to our client – within the meaning
7 of Section 830 (2) of the German Civil Code (BGB) and Section 27 (1)
8 of the German Criminal Code (StGB). Your assistance had a very
9 significant effect on the crime. People only trusted the governments and
10 authorities because they believed that the risk assessment was
11 scientifically sound. And people have placed their faith in this precisely
12 because of you.
13 It is ultimately due to your sinister advice that the health authorities are
14 no longer able to keep up with the mass tests and contact tracing, thus
15 providing the federal government with a pretext to use the German
16 armed forces for contact tracing via the lever of Article 35 of the
17 German Constitution, thus further intimidating the population. Apart
18 from the fact that this deployment of the Bundeswehr in the field of
19 classic intervention administration is in no way covered by the Basic
20 Law, your recommendations have fostered a scenario that gives rise to
21 the greatest concern. How far will the German government go in
22 deploying the Bundeswehr, i.e. the armed forces? Should we be
23 concerned that the same soldiers who are tracking down people today
24 (i.e., alleged contacts of allegedly infected people) will commit much
25 worse attacks on the people tomorrow at the behest of the Federal
26 Government?
27 IV. Legal Consequences
28 Now that we have listed, cursorily and without any claim to
29 completeness, the damage caused by the Non-Pharmaceutical
30 Interventions of politicians in the Corona crisis on your advice, we now
31 look at our client. By deliberately giving scientifically unfounded
32 recommendations to politicians or by promoting such measures from a
33 position of influence, you have also deliberately caused him
34 unconscionable damage and are therefore liable to our client under
35 Section 826 of the German Civil Code (BGB) for the harm already
36 caused. In addition, you personally must rectify the misinformation you
37 have put into the world in an equivalent manner and in this way avert
38 further harm to our client.
39 The harm already incurred amounts to several hundred thousand euros.
40 And every day that our client’s karaoke bar is not allowed to open, the
41 harm continues to worsen. We hereby demand in the name of and on
Page 42
1 behalf of our client a part payment of € 50,000. We call on you in the

2 name of and on behalf of our client to remit this sum, to our attention, to
3 the bank account indicated on the letterhead.
4 The power of attorney to receive payment is assured by a lawyer. We
5 look forward to receiving your payment by:
6 22.12.2020
7 Our client expressly reserves the right to assert claims in excess of the
8 amount initially demanded.
9 In addition, we request that you correct the following statements to those
10 politically responsible and to the public:
11  Clarify that there is no reason to believe that SARS-CoV-2 could cause
12 an uncontrollable number of deaths and ICU patients
13  Clarify that the case study in the New England Journal of Medicine of
14 March 5, 2020, in which you were involved and which supposedly
15 proves an asymptomatic infection, is based on false data and therefore
16 should have been retracted long ago
17  Clarify that a positive PCR test cannot detect active infection and is
18 therefore not suitable to establish a COVID-19 diagnosis on its own
19  Clarify that collective restrictions on freedom do not do anything to
20 contain the spread, but are proven to cause massive collateral damage
21 We also call on you to refrain from your previous statements to the
22 contrary. Politicians must no longer be advised with scientifically
23 inadequate information. And the public must no longer be confused with
24 such assertions.
25 We therefore call on you also to return by:
26 22.12.2020
27 the undertaking, subject to a penalty, to cease and desist, which is
28 enclosed with this letter.
29 Please note that with every day that you maintain your deliberately false
30 risk assessment of COVID-19, you are only making matters worse – for
31 countless people in this country, but also for yourself. We will make this
32 letter available to all colleagues who are willing to represent clients who
33 have suffered harm as a result of the Corona measures. If you do not
34 comply with our above request, a lawsuit will become unavoidable. In
35 the course of this lawsuit, the whole truth about the lockdown will
36 become the subject of a judicial hearing.
37 Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.
38 Yours sincerely
39
Page 43
1 Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, LL.M.

2 Attorney at Law
3
4 END QUOTE
5
6 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-19-vaccine-
7 news/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e6b37aec-89c0-44b5-be90-
8 d2376c84bfcb
9
10 COVID Vaccine Trials to Include Participants as Young as 6 Months + More • Children's Health
11 Defense
12 QUOTE
13 California Health Officials Call for Pause on Moderna Vaccine

14 Batch Due to Reports of Allergic Reactions
15 The Defender reported:
16 California health officials are calling for a pause on the use of a huge batch of Moderna’s COVID
17 vaccine due to its ”higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions.”
18 California’s top epidemiologist Dr. Erica S. Pan issued a statement Sunday evening recommending
19 providers pause the administration of lot ‘041L20A’ of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine due
20 to possible allergic reactions that are under investigation.
21 “A higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions were reported with a specific lot of
22 Moderna vaccine administered at one community vaccination clinic. Fewer than 10 individuals
23 required medical attention over the span of 24 hours,” Dr. Pan said.
24 END QUOTE
25
26 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-19-vaccine-
27 news/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e6b37aec-89c0-44b5-be90-
28 d2376c84bfcb
29
30 COVID Vaccine Trials to Include Participants as Young as 6 Months + More • Children's Health
31 Defense
32 QUOTE
33 After a Freezer Filled with COVID-19 Vaccines Broke, a California Hospital Scrambled to
34 Administer More Than 800 Doses in About 2 Hours. CNN reported:
35 When a freezer that was used to store the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine at a
36 Northern California hospital broke, officials soon realized they only had about two hours to
37 administer the more than 800 doses that were inside
38 And they took on the challenge.

Page 44
1 The executive team at Mendocino County’s Adventist Health Ukiah Valley Medical Center was
2 notified during a safety inspection Monday morning that a freezer was found to be at room
3 temperature, Judson Howe, of Adventist Health, told CNN. And the alarm that was supposed to
4 alert staff of the temperature change had also malfunctioned.
5 Unlike the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, Moderna’s vaccine can be stored in normal freezers and does
6 not require ultra-cold transportation. But at room temperature, the vaccine has a shelf life of about
7 12 hours, Howe said.
8 END QUOTE
9
10
11 https://www.westernjournal.com/whistleblowers-make-alarming-accusations-covid-testing-
12 lab/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=conservative-brief-
13 WJ&ff_campaign=dailypm&ff_content=western-journal
14 Whistleblowers Make Alarming Accusations About COVID Testing Lab
15 QUOTE
16 KVOR said it interviewed “more than half a dozen whistleblowers,
17 including several current and former employees at the lab” who
18 cited “contamination, constantly changing protocols as well as
19 unlicensed and inadequately trained staff as the reason for the
20 high number of invalid and inconclusive results.”
21 The station said it was shown an email to staff concerning
22 sample swabs found in restrooms, something that happened
23 more than once.
24 When asked why this would take place, a whistleblower identified as
25 Dottie replied, “Who knows what they’re doing? They’re not supervised.”
26 Whistleblowers shared photos and videos of technicians
27 watching videos or sleeping while processing tests.
28 Lab techs sleeping while processing COVID samples for testing. COVID
29 test swabs found in the restrooms. These are just two of the concerning
30 allegations from whistleblowers about what’s happening inside the
31 state’s new billion-dollar COVID testing lab. https://t.co/auNtf9y545
32 — CBS Sacramento CBS13 (@CBSSacramento) February 8, 2021
33 The whistleblowers also said there were too few qualified supervisors and
34 provided documentation to KOVR indicating that at least one supervisor
35 had no lab experience. Qualified technicians were also in short supply,
36 they said.
37 RELATED: SCOTUS Decision Partially Strikes Down California
38 Restrictions on Worship
39 “And the people that are training them are also unlicensed,” Dottie
40 pointed out. “When they don’t have enough training, they don’t know that
41 what they’re doing is wrong.”
42 The California Department of Public Health said in a statement to KOVR,
43 “All individuals who are working in the laboratory … handling specimens
44 are credentialed and trained.”
Page 45
1 “This is FALSE!!!!!!!!!!!” one whistleblower said in reply. “I was running

2 samples my first day with zero clinical experience. So were the rest of my
3 colleagues.”
4 END QUOTE
5
6 In my view any advisor who has failed to properly consider relevant issues should be
7 removed from the committee.
8 After all their failure to properly consider matters may end up costing the lives of many innocent
9 individuals who rely upon the committee providing appropriate advice. However the TGA
10 cannot be excused either because it has a legal obligation to ensure that any advise it receives is
11 double checked as after all the statement “the TGA has decided that this vaccine
12 meets the high safety, efficacy and quality standards required for use in
13 Australia.” Must mean that the TGA other than merely rubberstamping whatever it was
14 advised it actually did its own trials, etc, to establish the truth.
15
16 How on earth can the TGA claim “has decided that this vaccine meets the high
17 safety, efficacy and quality standards required for use in Australia. ” When to
18 my understanding it merely seemed to have rubber stamped whatever was presented without any
19 trials in Australia to establish the truth.
20 .
21
22 Risk Assessment and Risk Management

23 Plan for
24 DIR 180
25 Commercial supply of a genetically modified
26 COVID-19 vaccine
27 QUOTE
44 Issues raised in the submission were:
 “The Astra-Zeneca vaccine has been made using chimpanzee DNA? We already saw what happened in the
late 1950’s with the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines that were contaminated with at least 3 monkey viruses. So
is this going to happen all over again, just for greed and profits?”
“The regulators “The regulators that are supposed to protect the people, appear to
be compromised to vested interests, and this is just appalling!”

Page 46
1 (The response)
2 The functions of the Gene Technology Regulator are defined by the Gene Technology Act 2000(the Act).
3 The Regulator must consider each application for a licence for work with GMOs based on criteria listed in
4 the Act and prepare a risk assessment and risk management plan (RARMP). The RARMP is a thorough and
5 critical assessment of data supplied by the applicant, together with a review of other relevant national and
6 international scientific literature. Australian Government departments and agencies, technical experts,
7 State and Territory Governments, the Minister for the Environment and the public are consulted during
8 development of the RARMP to ensure that topics of concern related to risks to health and safety of people
9 and the environment are identified and addressed.
10 The RARMP prepared for the COVID-19 vaccine from AstraZeneca concluded that risks to people and the
11 environment as a result of the import, transport, storage and disposal of the vaccine are negligible.
12
13 (Submission)
14 Vaccines resulted in death of elderly people in Norway, the UK, Israel and the USA. “How can such
15 dangerous products just be approved and ‘rubber-stamped’?”
16 A text written by Dr David Martin (dated 5 January 2021) regarding mRNA based vaccine and the use of the
17 term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine (referring to mRNA
18 vaccine).
19
20 (The response)
21 The issues raised in relation to different COVID-19 vaccines are outside the scope of this assessment
22 conducted by the Regulator.
23 END QUOTE
24
25 In my view those who neglect to do their job should be charged where due to that people are
26 harmed or even die. However, I view a proper review should be done and in the meantime any
27 approval be stayed as the lives and wellbeing of citizens and so the vulnerable in particular must
28 not be ignored.
29
30 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
31
32 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
33 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
34 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

35 (Our name is our motto!)


20210217-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To PM MR SCOTT MORRISON & Ors-Re Vaccination Issues

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

20210217-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To PM MR SCOTT MORRISON & Ors-Re Vaccination Issues

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Page 1

35 Tue, 16 Feb at 10:31 pm

36 Comirnaty is a vaccine for preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in

40 COVID-19 vaccine: Pfizer Australia -

43 The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has granted provisional approval

1 Following a thorough and independent review of Pfizer's submission, the

4 COMIRNATY is provisionally approved and included in the Australian Register

15 Australians can be confident that the TGA's review process of this

26 TGA provisionally approves

29 The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has granted provisional

32 COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is provisionally approved and included in the

17-2-2021 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 "TGA's regulatory approval allows the second dose to be administered from 4

14 My comments: Note: "ongoing clinical trials" - what the heck? Proof

16 Elderly patients over 65 years of age demonstrated a

37 Australians can be confident that the TGA's review process of this

1 As with all vaccine approvals, the TGA will:

2  Continue to actively monitor the vaccine in Australia and

5  Undertake laboratory batch assessment of each batch of the

13 Further information on the COVID-19 vaccine rollout is available on

17-2-2021 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Reassuringly, there were no safety concerns in this age group in the

17-2-2021 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Authorities Investigating After

10 36-Year-Old Doctor Dies After Second Dose of COVID Vaccine

1 vaccinations in Kenya (Source: https://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-sterilization-kenyan-

1 an elderly patient should be decided on a case-by-case basis with

39 NY Mag admits Fauci “hot-wired” coronavirus with gain-of-

3 The first “Project Bioshield” contract, as it is called, was awarded by Fauci to

10 When challenged by some 750 scientists in a letter protesting the direction in

17-2-2021 Page 14 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

17-2-2021 Page 17 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Article Source: Global Research

9 Even CDC Now Admits No ‘Gold

25 3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism must

17-2-2021 Page 19 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

17-2-2021 Page 20 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

24 Imaginary and Theoretical

27 “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available

17-2-2021 Page 21 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 As covered in my previous article SARS-CoV-2: The Stitched Together,

17-2-2021 Page 22 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 RMAN-DROSTEN REVIEW REPORT

1 The occurrence of infections can be monitored by expanding testing

1 and others claimed that a symptomless Chinese businesswoman had met

1 only to a Chinese study and a study from Singapore, both of which

5  No test is 100% accurate. At low prevalence, even minor deficiencies

35  A PCR test is not capable of distinguishing mere contamination from

1 pose a risk of infection. Nevertheless, a PCR test will deliver a positive

1 their Emergency Room service being closed for ambulances. Between

17-2-2021 Page 32 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

17-2-2021 Page 33 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 If the upcoming winter should indeed bring to light a large number of

1 reached at less than 70% depending on other factors; NDR podcast of

1 significantly greater excess mortality over other years. That’s the

1 containing an (alleged) pandemic, under the guise of protecting against

1 behalf of our client a part payment of € 50,000. We call on you in the

1 Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, LL.M.

13 California Health Officials Call for Pause on Moderna Vaccine

17-2-2021 Page 43 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 “This is FALSE!!!!!!!!!!!” one whistleblower said in reply. “I was running

22 Risk Assessment and Risk Management

34 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®