Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Table I: Predicted rotational constants, inertial defect, and structural conformations for 1-pentanal . 6
Table II-A: Observed and predicted values along with error for 1-pentanal . . . . . . . . 8
Table II-B: Observed and predicted values along with error for 1-hexanal . . . . . . . . 9
Table II-C: Observed and predicted values along with error for 1-heptanal . . . . . . . . 9
Works Cited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Jennifer Lin
ABSTRACT
microwave spectrometer. The results were compared against molecular modeling predictions.
The molecular modeling calculations predicted fifteen, fifty-eight, and one-hundred forty-eight
conformers for 1-pentanal, 1-hexanal, and 1-heptanal, respectively, of which four, five, and five
should have had sufficient population at room temperature to be detected in the molecular beam.
Experimentally, six, seven, and five conformers were observed for these aldehydes. The
rotational constants, which are sensitive probes of molecular structure, were predicted within
6% by the molecular modeling calculations, except for one case where they were in error by
24%.
2
Jennifer Lin
INTRODUCTION
the rotational constants A, B, and C, which are the reciprocals of the three principal moments of
microwave spectrometer and the results are compared against molecular modeling predictions
using the MM3 molecular mechanics force field. The long-chain aldehydes are chosen for study
because of their polarity and their possible potential to become more globular, similar to
proteins and other biological molecules important to intelligent drug design. The MM3 force
field, one of the current standards in molecular modeling, has not been previously tested with
experimental data of anything remotely close to the structure of a protein. Improved molecular
forty-eight conformers for 1-pentanal, 1-hexanal, and 1-heptanal, respectively, of which four,
five, and five should have sufficient population at room temperature to be detected in the
molecular beam. Experimentally, six, seven, and five conformers have been observed in the
present study. The experimental rotational constants are sensitive probes of molecular structure
and agree to within 6% by the molecular modeling calculations, except for one case where they
are in error by 24%, and one where they are in error by 14%.
3
Jennifer Lin
BACKGROUND
In the past, drugs have been developed by trial-and-error. However, recent advances in
computer speed and graphics as well as in molecular modeling software and theory have
enabled the development of intelligent drug design [1]. In many cases, molecular modeling is
being applied to increasingly complex molecular systems to predict conformations of drugs and
their ability to attach to the receptor site of a protein. However, there is a need to further
[2]. The results of molecular spectroscopy can be used to evaluate molecular modeling
predictions. Of particular importance is the ability to test a system with a large number of
Previous research has been conducted on various types of molecules such as the alkanes
and the alkenes [3]. Both of these sets of molecules, however, contain highly non-polar
functional groups and have less significance as a biological molecule. Aldehydes, on the other
hand, are highly polar and more closely resemble the more conformationally complex molecules
found in biological systems. The current study was designed to determine the effect of this
polarity on the conformational structure and energy levels. Furthermore, this study looks to
advance towards the goal of testing the validity of molecular modeling predictions for a
Previously, only hydrocarbon chains were examined, testing the sensitivity of molecular
modeling to carbon and hydrogen containing molecules. Aldehydes contain a carbonyl group,
which possess an oxygen atom and places more demand on the molecular modeling force field.
4
Jennifer Lin
Hence, the sensitivity of molecular modeling on oxygen in addition to hydrogen and carbon can
be assessed.
The rotational spectra was examined and recorded using pulsed molecular-beam
purified by distillation by using the freeze-pump-thaw method. A sample was then prepared by
mixing the molecule with an inert carrier gas, consisting of twenty-percent helium in neon by
volume. A molecular beam was formed by expanding the gas adiabatically through a 1.2-mm
Low-Resolution Analysis
The rotational spectra consisted of discrete resonance of ~10 kHz linewidth. The
resonance structure is well predicted by quantum mechanics, and is primarily sensitive to the
moments of inertia of the molecule. Initially, several gigahertz (GHz) wide low-resolution
spectra were recorded. Predictions of rotational assignments and energy levels were given by
molecular modeling calculations using from the MM3 force field, a standard in molecular
High-Resolution Analysis
Using survey scans, the a-type electric dipole spectral patterns were first identified.
Individual transitions with its corresponding quantum numbers were placed into a least-squares
fit to the spectroscopic Hamiltonian. When necessary, the Stark effect was examined to
determine the rotational quantum numbers of a transition. To utilize the Stark effect, an
electronic field was induced in the Fabry-Perot cavity within the spectrometer. This caused a
5
Jennifer Lin
<see gaussian_modeling_summary.xls>
6
Jennifer Lin
resonance to split, allowing the determination of angular momentum states. Eventually as the fit
was improved and the number of assigned a-type transitions increase, b- and c-type transitions
were also measured and recorded at high-resolution to use in fitting the spectra.
Rotational Constants
With the assignments, the observed rotational constants A, B, and C as well as the
inertial defect were compared to those from the predictions. The inertial defect was calculated
∆ I = IC – IB – IA,
where IA, IB, and IC are components of the inertia tensor of the molecule in the principal axis
were compared to those found in other molecules observed in previous research performed on
Predictions of the A, B, and C rotational constants were made using the MM3 molecular
mechanics force field. These calculations also led to information regarding the relative minima
Using the MM3 predictions as a guide, six of the fifteen conformers predicted to be
relative minima were found for 1-pentanal. For 1-hexanal, it was expected the five lowest
energy conformers would be found from the fifty-eight total possible conformers. Instead, seven
were found. Out of the one hundred forty-eight possible conformers of 1-heptanal, the five
7
Jennifer Lin
lowest-energy conformers were identified. The constants and inertial defects of each conformer
Conformers differ by a value for the dihedral angles. In all molecules, there is a planar
conformer, which is the extended form of the molecule. This is always the lowest-energy
conformer. As in the normal (unbranched) alkanes, this conformer usually forms around a
C C C C
C C C C
As the number of carbons increase, so do the number of possible conformers for the molecule
because of more possible changes in dihedral angles. The lower-energy conformers have fewer
twists in comparison to the higher-energy conformers, which are found to be more globular.
Table II-A: Observed and predicted values along with error for 1-pentanal.
1-Pentanal: CH3(CH2)3CHO
Observed
I II III IV V VI
A 10361 9718 6897 14877 7963 6245
B 1467 1566 1905 1248 1639 2023
C 1328 1476 1647 1218 1471 1912
∆I -12.6 -32.3 -31.7 -24.0 -28.1 -66.4
Predicted
I II III IV V VI
A 10138 9616 6766 14682 7811 5891
B 1457 1547 1897 1231 1629 2069
C 1317 1458 1633 1203 1458 1939
∆I -12.9 -32.6 -31.6 -24.8 -28.4 -69.4
Error
I II III IV V VI
A 0.022 0.011 0.019 0.013 0.019 0.057
B 0.007 0.012 0.004 0.014 0.006 -0.022
C 0.008 0.012 0.009 0.013 0.009 -0.014
∆I -0.024 -0.012 0.004 -0.034 -0.007 -0.046
Note: Conformer I is the planar conformer. Also, Conformer IV experienced internal rotation tunneling of the
terminal methyl group.
8
Jennifer Lin
Table II-B: Observed and predicted values along with error for 1-hexanal.
1-Hexanal: CH3(CH2)4CHO
Observed
I II III IV V VI VII
A 9770 5995 5400 8974 12500 5456 5362
B 869 1047 1143 933 785 1056 1110
C 819 946 1029 898 612 937 1063
∆I -16.0 -32.9 -44.5 -35.0 ? -32.1 -74.1
Predicted
I II III IV V VI VII
A 9545 5877 5289 8862 12696 5350 5410
B 863 1040 1140 923 767 1050 1128
C 812 938 1021 889 755 930 1085
∆I -16.2 -33.4 -43.9 -35.9 -29.2 -32.3 -75.8
Error
I II III IV V VI VII
A 0.023 0.020 0.021 0.012 -0.016 0.019 -0.009
B 0.006 0.007 0.003 0.011 0.023 0.005 -0.016
C 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.010 -0.234 0.008 -0.021
∆I -0.013 -0.015 0.013 -0.026 N/A -0.006 -0.023
Note: Conformer I was once again the planar molecule. Conformer V was very prolate and proved hard to assign,
accounting for the inability to calculate the internal defect.
Table II-C: Observed and predicted values along with error for 1-heptanal.
1-Heptanal: CH3(CH2)5CHO
Observed
I II III IV V
A 7883 6679 5098 4999 6335
B 572 621 659 706 632
C 545 596 610 659 606
∆I -19.2 -41.6 -37.6 -50.3 -45.9
Predicted
I II III IV V
A 7697 6574 4518 4913 6277
B 569 617 694 703 624
C 541 591 629 655 600
∆I -19.4 -41.8 -36.4 -49.9 -47.6
Error
I II III IV V
A 0.024 0.016 0.114 0.017 0.009
B 0.006 0.007 -0.053 0.004 0.012
C 0.007 0.008 -0.031 0.007 0.010
∆I -0.011 -0.005 0.031 0.008 -0.036
Note: Conformer I, the planar conformer, was very dominating as can be seen in the significantly lower internal
defect, which made other conformers extremely hard to find.
9
Jennifer Lin
line splitting from internal rotation tunneling of the terminal methyl group. In this case, the
lower frequency on the K1s was used in fitting the spectra along with the higher frequency on
the K0. The planar conformer, as also found in the other two molecules, had at least half the
inertial defect of the other conformers. In this molecule, the inertial defect of this conformer was
–12.6.
As for 1-hexanal, Conformer V was very prolate on account of the much greater A
rotational constant in comparison to the B and C rotational constants. Most aldehydes are
prolate versus oblate, however this conformer was found to be especially prolate, exhibiting a
κ = 2B-A-C
A-C
and where κ = -1 denotes the extreme for a prolate molecule and κ = 1 denotes the extreme
In the case of 1-heptanal, the lowest-energy conformer dominated the spectrum, making
the other conformers much harder to identify. There was a 0.8 kcal/mole energy difference
between Conformer I and the next conformer, causing Conformer I to dominate the spectrum. If
this trend was to continue for longer aldehydes, then a well-defined momentum for a tertiary
It was observed the rotational constants and the inertial defect were very sensitive to
slight conformational structure differences. It was also observed in majority of the cases, the
error for the rotational constant A was much greater than those for B and C. This is consistent
with the findings of the alkenes. In all cases, the lowest-energy conformer had the inertial defect
10
Jennifer Lin
conformational structures of aliphatic aldehydes, however they are still quite inaccurate. The
molecular modeling numbers was almost always within 6%, although still not very precise
when compared to the actual constants. A slight variation of the constants was found to predict a
different spectrum altogether, and therefore the molecular modeling numbers were still quite
inaccurate although they were roughly correct. These constants are also necessary to make
Molecular modeling on aldehydes was found to be worse than the alkanes and alkenes as
shown by the rotational constant errors, which was at least two times greater than in previous
studies. This could be attributed to the polarization by the carbonyl group and the poorer quality
Further studies should be conducted on molecules more closely related to the complex
consists of sulfur, phosphorous, or nitrogen within the hydrocarbon chain. This can lead towards
testing the validity of molecular modeling for proteins or nucleic acids, which contain these
investigate the sensitivity to oxygen through an ether, an ester, or an alcohol rather than through
the carbonyl group found on an aldehyde. With more information regarding the validity of
molecular modeling on these suggestions, the applicability of intelligent drug design will be
better understood.
11
Jennifer Lin
WORKS CITED
2. Howard Busch, Walter J. Stevens. Chemical Physics Letters. 169, Number 4 (8 June 1990).
12
Jennifer Lin
Jennifer Lin
Montgomery Blair High School
Silver Spring, MD
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Optical Technology Division
Gaithersburg, MD
January 1999
13