PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF

AODV, AODV-ETX AND MODIFIED AODV-ETX

FOR V2V AUTONOMOUS CAR COMMUNICATION
IN VANET USING SUMO AND NS3
 RELATED WORK
Author(s) Reasearch Results
N. Jevtic and M. AODV vs AODV-ETX in MANET AODV-ETX gives a better performance as compared to AODV in terms of end-
Malnar in [1] using NS3 end delay and packet loss ratio, whereas AODV gives a better performance in
terms of routing overhead

A. Purnomo, et al Effect of Variation In ART and MRT In the randomly mobile node topology showed stable performance on the
in [2] on The Performance of AODV-ETX MRT and ART values of ≥ 80 s
in MANET using NS2
A. Purnomo, et al AODV-ETX vs AODV-ETX with MRT Modified AODV-ETX with MRT and ART 80s increases throughput by 5.72 %,
in [3] and ART 80s in MANET using NS2 increasing PDR by 5.80 %, decreasing routing overhead by 4.31 %, but has an
increase in end-to-end delay of 10.19 % and a route discovery increase of 3.09
% compared to AODV
M. Malnar and N. AODV vs AODV-ETX in VANET using ETX metric can improve reliability for packet delivery of AODV. Packet loss
Jevtic in [4] NS3 ratio is significantly reduced from 60% to only 8% for sparse network, but for
dense network overhead is highly increased
B. Amina and E. VANET routing protocol using Performance of OLSR is best in PDR and throughput. Whereas GPSR and GPCR
Mohamed in [5] SUMO and NS3 are the best two routing in overhead and E2E delay.
F. Malik, at al in [6] VANET routing protocol using Different routing protocols that can be used for communications among
SUMO and OMNET++ autonomous vehicles have been investigated. The results show that the DSR
depicts efficient performance over all as compared to AODV and DSDV.
 RESEARCH OBJECTIVE
• to compare the performance of the AODV Routing Protocol and its modification in the form of AODV +
ETX and AODV + ETX with MRT and ART equal 80s which is applied in autonomous intelligent cars in
the Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) through Network Simulator 3

• to optimize AODV Routing Type by manipulating metrics to select the route based on the closest HOP
to achieve goals effectively and efficiently

• to test / validate the research performance using network simulator 3 to model autonomous car
movements using the best route to the destination by utilizing the reactive routing protocols AODV,
AODV + ETX, AODV + ETX with MRT and ART equal 80s

• to analyze and conclude simulation performance of the AODV routing protocol and its modification in
the form of AODV + ETX and AODV + ETX with MRT and ART equal 80s for Optimizing V2V
Communication in Autonomous Car in the Vehicular Ad Network (VANET)
 SIMULATION SCENARIO

AODV-ETX PERFORMACE
• Generate Map using MODIFICATION • Simulate AODV, ANALYSIS
OpenStreetMap AODV-ETX and AODV-
• Generate trace file from • Applying the MRT and • Throughput Analysis
ETX with MRT ART 80s
generated map ART values of 80s in
with exported Mobility
• Export Mobility Model AODV-ETX
Model
from trace file
PROJECT SCENARIO
GENERATION USING SIMULATION
SUMO
PROGRESS | PROJECT SCENARIO GENERATION

Image - Generate Map using OpenStreetMap

 PROGRESS | PROJECT SCENARIO GENERATION

Image - Generate trace file from generated map Image - Export Mobility Model from trace file
 PROGRESS | RUN AODV AND AODV-ETX

Image – Run source code for AODV Image – Run source code for AODV-ETX
https://www.nsnam.org/doxygen/aodv_8cc_source.html https://github.com/neje/ns3-aodv-etx
REFERENCES

1. N. Jevtic and M. Malnar, "Implementation of ETX Metric within the AODV Protocol in the NS-3 Simulator," Telfor
Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 20-25, 2018.
2. A. Purnomo, et al, “Effect of Variation In Active Route Timeout and My Route Timeout on The Performance of AODV-
ETX Protocol in Mobile Adhoc Network”, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 333 012107, 2018
3. A. Purnomo, et al, "Performance Comparison of Modified AODV-ETX with AODV and AODV-ETX Routing Protocol in an
MANET," in IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 578 012082, 2019.
4. M. Malnar and N. Jevtic, “A Framework for Performance Evaluation of VANETs Using NS-3 Simulator”, Promet – Traffic
& Transportation, Vol. 32, 2020, No. 2, 255-268, 2019
5. B. Amina and E. Mohamed, “Performance evaluation of VANETs routing protocols using SUMO and NS3”, IEEE, 2018
6. F. Malik, at al, "Performance Evaluation of Data Dissemination Protocols for Connected Autonomous Vehicles“, Digital
Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3006040