Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Transparency is the main property of glass and the better it is exploited and
integrated into the building, the more difficult it is to perceive the shape of the
surfaces, to understand the flow of forces and, in particular, to visualize the
structural scheme. The design of glass structure is based on different levels of
concept that can, but often are not, readable in the final object. The recent
architectural interest in blob shapes, the latest technological development, and the
comprehension of the structural behavior of glass allow us, today, to reach a new
level of technical complexity well-hidden in the very simple and sinuous form of
the envelope.
1. Introduction
The history of architecture has shown how glass has been used in different ways over
the centuries. First, it was used merely as a way of closing the building and allowing
the light to penetrate to the inside. In the nineteen century, glass and steel went together,
allowing for the extremely transparent envelopes of the English greenhouses. At the
beginning of the century, expressionist architecture renewed its interest in this material
as can be seen in the work of Bruno Taut and that of Scheerbart.
Figure 1a, Glazing of gothic church – Fig. 1b, Kew Garden greenhouse – Fig. 1c, Painting of Hans Sharoun
At any time that the transparency of glass has been exploited, different conceptual
reasons were behind it. In glasshouses, transparency allows light penetration in order to
re-create a natural environment faraway from the original location. However, the
transparent world of the expressionist architects had more to do with a political vision
and how architecture and transparency can change society.
Transparency assumes a different significance in each different period, but it is also
important to stress that in each period, the interest and the approach to the glass
aesthetic is characterized by a different use of glass in terms of both technology and
construction technique.
The sense of transparency and glass engineering are not fixedly related: the same
transparent effect could correspond to different techniques, to different uses of glass
and, in the end, glass transparency can materialize in different ways. On the other hand,
the same technique could lead to different formal results.
Such a wide scenario in terms of concept, approach, and solution characterizes the
recent history of transparency and, in particular, the last thirty years when a new course
was anticipated by the façade for the Headquarters of Willis Faber Dumas, developed
by Martin Francis, an early partner of RFR. This façade was followed, a few years later,
by the Bioclimatic Greenhouses of La Villette, RFR’s first project, which was marked
by the invention of the “rotule”.
This invention allowed the construction of the very first example of wide span and
100% percent frameless façade based on the structural use of glass. The Bioclimatic
Greenhouses established the basis for absolute transparency and also opened the
modern course of structural glass that characterizes recent buildings.
Figure 2a and b, Willis Faber Dumas 1975 - Fig. 2c, Bioclimatic Greenhouse 1984
The more that façades become frameless and transparent, the more difficult it becomes
to perceive the shape. The structural functioning also becomes less evident. The
relationship between transparency and geometry, both in terms of structural analysis
and envelope form, as interpreted by RFR in its twenty-five year history, has been in
continuous development. Present-day projects have been able to exploit this
transparency in new ways.
Figure 3a, 50 Avenue Montaigne 1992 – Figure 3b, Strasburg High Speed Train Station 2007
2. Load path: the hidden geometry of stress lines
2.4. Façade Ville: the transition between fail safe to damage tolerance
The Façade Ville of Terminal 2F at Charles de Gaulle Airport deals with the post-
breaking behavior by being stabilized by 12m-high glass stiffeners. This façade is
characterized by a frame which holds large glass panels and keeps the glass stiffeners
from rotating, thus enhancing the torsional lateral bulking behavior. The vertical
stiffeners, connected by a friction grip connection, are monolithic tempered glass and
cannot by themselves assure the post-breaking residual integrity of laminate glass. That
role is therefore assured by the vertical steel elements, and in the case of the failure of a
glass stiffener, such a vertical element will still undergo a large displacement. Thanks
to the catenary effect, it will then provide a residual strength with respect to the wind
loads.
Regarding the Bioclimatic Greenhouse, there is not a real double load path, but the
residual part of the structure is still capable of resisting loads, even though it has a
behavior very different from the original one.
Figure 5a, Glass stiffeners of the Façade Ville at Charles de Gaulle Airport – Fig. 5b and c, Glass stiffener
connection of the Radio France Headquarter facade
In the case of the renovation of the main façade of Radio France, due to the big storm
of 1999 which damaged part of the façade, the original monolithic glass stiffeners have
been replaced by a triple laminate. The splicing of the glass stiffeners is a realized
friction grip connection acting only on the central glass, which is the main structural
element. The side panels protect the central element from accidental shocks and assure
the post-failure strength. In the case of failure of the central glass, the glass on either
side maintains the integrity of the sandwich and still allows a partial transfer of forces.
In case of the failure of all three panes, the different breaking mode of the heat-
strengthened glass will still retain continuity in the connection and thus, avoid the
tearing of the holes and assure a minimal residual strength necessary to maintain the
façade during normal climate conditions.
Figure 6a, b and c: Glass stair for the Bouygues Headquarters, Paris
Figure 7a, b and c: Structural connection pad of load bearing glass of horizontal arched wall
The consequent thickness of the glass results in the resolution of a complex problem:
thin glass is less resistant, but it takes advantage of the curvature effect and it consumes
less resistance capacity while cold-bending. However, thick glass is more resistant; it
works under pure bending, but its residual stress, after cold-bending, is much higher.
The arcs are not circular, so that the glass panels have different radii varying from
approximately 30 to 11 meters, with the tightest panels placed in the middle of the
vault. Given the different families of glass curvature, the cold-bending technique has
been optimised with respect to the different radii.
Figure 12: External view of the extension of the Strasbourg High Speed Train Station