Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 8

8

SPE
m~~mm-=

SPE 11747

A Rod Pumping System for California Lift Requirements


by H.C. Tait, Ahtiond Supply Co., Arn?co, Inc.

Copyright 19S3 Society of Petroleum Engmeere of AlME

This paper was presented at tha 1963 California Regional Meeting held m Vantura, California. M@rch23-25, 1983. The material is subjecl to correcfinn
by the author. Permission 10copy is restricted to an abstract of not more thsn 300 words. Wrile SPE, 6200 North Central Expressway, Drawar 64706,
Dallss, TX 75206.

ASSTRACT

Artificial lift requirements in California Accepting these Statistics aa reasonably


ollflelds cover a full range of demanding operating accurate, we can make some aeeumptions relative to
and environmental conditions. These extend from artificial lift on the part of California
typical demanda of lifting depth and volume, to operators: they are very familiar with the sucker
atypical requirements of heavy crude, thermal rod pumping system, both its advantages and
enhancement and the unique environmental limitations; they indicate a significantpreference
restrictions of our urban sites and offshore fol: this lift method; and, they must be concerned
fields. wi~h the edverse effect on operating costs of the
htgher than average repatr frequency of their lift
A new rod pumping system has been developed systems.
which deala with these requirenent~.Performance
results to date confirm reduced power consumption An extensive development project conducted
and improved pumping performance.Combined with the by a California basad design group, aj.med at
compact equipment atze, these characteriettcs developing an lmprovsd rod pumping system, has
appear to offer benefits to California operatora. attempted to address the operating cost factors as
well as the application limitations which are a
INTRODUCTION concern of operators in the local oilfields.

Artificial lift playa a vary afgnificant A primary objective of this project was to
role in California production operation. One develop a lift system capable of improved overall
source reporting industry statistical , indicates psrformence as a means of reducing operating costs.
that 92% of California wells are produced by some In achieving this objective, the dasignera
form of artificial lift. This compares to the U.S. drastically changed the configuration of the
average of 70% pumping unit, resulting in a compact, low profile
package ideally suited to the aesthetically
TM? same eource estimates that 85 to 90% sensitive urban sites and tightly spaced offshore
of U.S. wells on arttflcial lift uae the sucker rod applications in California producing fields.
pumping method. Csltfornia operators appear to
follow this nattonal Inclination with 90% of new The product of this developmentprogram Is
artificial lift tnstallationaduring 1981 reported Identified as the National LIFTRONIC Pumping
as rod pumping systems. 1 system, aa illustrated in Figure 1. Installations
are currently in operation on four California
The significance of artificial lift in producing oilwells. They are proving to offer
California operations is fuither emphasized by one measurable reduction in overall lifting costtsand
additional statistic. Thie reports that 106 repairs improved pumping performance. The compact surface
per 100 wells on artificial lift were made in equipment is also being recognized as a realiatic
California operations during 1981 as compared to answer to the requirement for low visiblity and
the U.S. average of 77 repairs per 100 wells. 1 minimum space in many producing etaas.

References and illustrationsat end of paper.

-AC
8

2 A ROD PUMPING SYSTEM FOR CALIFORNIA LIFT REQUIREMENTS SPE 11747

SYSTBM DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT

A full review of the design concepts and achieve a low profile Installation, the
resulting equipment of the LIFTRONIC system has counterweight.sare suspended in a fifty foot deep
been presented in an earlier SPE paper.2 A brief caeed hole adjacent to the well. The complete
review here will be beneficial in describing the pumpi~ unit mounts directly on the well ana
potential benefite for California applications. counterweightholes.

Design Concepts In operation, the load carrying chains are


wrapped and unwrapped on the contoured cams to
In addressing the prime development effect the strok%ng motton. During the upstroke,
objective of improved overall performance,three with the cam rotating in a clockwise direction
major design areas were considered; downhole (Figure 2), the wellside chaia i?rapsupon iteelf to
pumping efficiency, mechanical equipment design, smoothly increase the working diameter on the cam,
and operating control of the system. reaching maximun dimension at the top strcke
reversal.
A long stroke pumping actfon, operating at
a low cycle rate, was identified as most beneficial Meanwhile, as the wellside chain wraps
for improved downhole efflctency.A minimum stroke %tself to maximum working diameter, the
length of thirty feet, operating in the three counterweight chain unwrapa to lower the
stroke per minute range, wae selected for the counterweights, until no chain ramains wrapped on
design. This stroking motion contributes to the cam at the top reversal.
improved volumetric efficiency in the pump through
higher compression ratio and fewer valve actions. At the optimum point in the stroke
The low cycle rate reduces wear rate and dynamic revereal, as determined by the microproceeaorin
loading on all downhole components. the operating control, motor power is shut off.
This permits cam rotation to respond to the applied
To further contribute to high operating loads of the eystem. The imbalance of these loads
efficiency, the mechanical design called for resulting from differences in the working radii
simplicity, with the most direct drive mechanism (moment a~ms), brings about the stroke reversal.
poesible to tranemit stroking power to the rod Again under a~ntrol of the microprocessor,motor
string. Uniform counterbalance effect throughout power is reapplied to complete the downstroke.
the stroke was also desirable for efficient
operation. The resulting design met these criteria Figure 3 sl!ows the unit with the cover
and provided an extremly compact machine to serve removed to illustrate the difference in working
California application requirements. radii of the chains at the top reversal. A similar
but reverse Imbalance of loads occurs at the bottom
The concept for the operating control was etroke reversal.
to constantly monitor operating parameterswhich
influence overall performance,with the ability to Operating Control
be ~esponsive to changing conditions to maintain
desired performance. A mfcropocessor based The LIFTRONIC operating control te a
electronic control system was selected to provide modular solid-state electronic panel mounted in a
this capability. weather-tight enclosure. It provides all manual
and automatic control of the operation of the
Equipment and Operation pumping unit. The modular construction of this
control panel facilitates servicing by module
Figure 2 schematically illustrates the replacement, as opposed to electronic ciruit
installation arrangement of surface and subsurface troubleshooting.
equipment for the LIFTRONIC systern. Major
components include the pumping unit, an operating A cciputer module, operating in conjunction
control, and the subsurfacewell equipment. with the other control modules within the panel,
provides “intelligence” to the control system to
Pumping Unit perform the following functions:

The pumping unit for this system is a fully 1. Control motor power during stroke
enclosed machine containing two contoured drums reversals.
(cams) mounted on a common shaft, two load carrying 2. Monitor operating parameters and
chains (well and counterweight), and two chain automaticallyshut-down the unit if a t
idlers. A “doublereduction planetary gear reducer potentiallyhazardous condition develops.
is externally mounted on the housing. A fatl-safe 3. Automatically restart the unit If the
brake mounts on the gear reducer. Power is conditton clears.
transmitted from an electric motor to the gear 4. Shut-down the unit in avent of a
raducer through a belt drive. *’pump-off”condition, and restart
following an adjustable “off-time”,
The use of high strength chains to carry 5. Feed output data to an XT plotter for
the well and counterweightloads accounts for the dynamometer card print-out.
extremely compact design of the pumping unit. To

/40
SPZ
-.-——11747
--- H. C. TAIT 3

APPLICATION

Further inscription of these centrol Table 1 identifies basic specificationsfor


functions is covered in the earlier papar.2A the current LIFTRONIC model. Table 2 tabulates
significant control funtion contributingto enooth nominal pump diaplacenents and depth limits for
reversals and conservation of power ie the motor various pump boree at a range of pumping speads.
control during reversals.
The applic~tion range for this current
As the pumping unit neara the end of either model generally Kits well conditions requiring an
the upstroke or downstroke, the control senses API 228 or API 320 beam pumping unit. A computer
stroke position plus other operating paremetera, application design program has been devaloped for
and shuts off motor power through solld atate the system in conjunction vith the NABLA
circuitry to bagin the stroke reversal*While power Corporation. In addition to providing application
is off, motor polarity is reversed through design, this also permits analy~is of pradicted
contractorswithin the control panel. When the performance of the new system VS. a beam unit
motor raaches the synchronous speed range in the installation.
reversed direction, power is reapplied through a
low voltage control. This sequence provides emooth Planned development of this new lift syetem
reversals and minimizes current and torque aplkes includes one smaller size, and two higher capacity
when power ia applied. sizes. The objective will be to cover the broadast
possible range of pumping conditions, from moderate
The integral pump-off control function adds to high volume lifting requirements,and depthe to
to the overall performance of the eyatem by the limlts of sucker rod capacity.
quarding againet unnecessary power consumption or
unwanted equipment damage during a pumped off California Applications
condition.
The specific interest here is in the
The dynamometer capability is aleo capabilities of thie new pumping system in dealing
significant in that this data is readily available with the artificial lift requirements of California
for diagnostic anelysia of performance through operations. Downhole pumping conditions to consider
integral components in the system. The XY plotter should include high temperature and heawy oil
can trace “position” plotted againet polished rod artificial Ifft, highly deviated wells and even the
load, motor speed or motor current. A futura option “plafn vanilla” wells which present no specific
will permit transmissionof thesa data to a remote pumpiug problems. Another application requirement
monitoring point. relates to the various restrictionson the surface
installationwhich apply to many producing fields.
Well Equipment
High Temperature
Tha low profile installationof the pumping
unit requires a replacement for the conventional In thermal recovery operation, artificial
etuffing box. This “wellhead seal aqsembly” Is lift equipmant capable of withstanding the high
achemctically illustrh:.eh in Figure 2. It ia operating temperature must be selected. Con-
in ailed on the wellhead and extends approximately venttonal rod pumping systems have generally bean
forty feet into the well. The tubing string is found successful in these applications,requiring
suspended on the outer jacket of this aasembly. only replacement of stuffing box packing with high
The sucker rod atring is attached to the polished temperature elements.
rod in the assembly.
The LIFTRONIC stuffing box configurationie
A dual seal arrangement ia used to provide con8tderably changed, as descr5bed above, and would
reliable containment of well fluids within the flow be the moat critical element for high temperature
stream. A stationary seal at the lower end of the operation. One installation of this system Is in
assembly packs-off against the traveling pol%shed operation on a steam cycled well in Western Canada.
rod. A traveling seal is carried on the piston After curing an initial problem of inc~~table
which connects the polished rod to the well-side materials, the subsurface stuffing has
chain, and seals in a polished tube. Both scale are performed without problem at operating and steaming
spring-loaded and self-adjusting for eealing temperature. The high temperaturepacking used is
reliability. Automatic purging of any leakage rated to tolerate the 600”F injected steam
above the stationary saal ia accomplishedby the temperature.
atroktng piston to contain leakage withtn the flow
stream. i?luid flow from the tubing moves up the This well is equipped with a poltshed rod
annular area between the polished tube and outer blowout preventer (BOP). The rame close on a emooth
jacket to the flow line connection. spool locatad between the well-side chain and
traveling piston in the wellhead seal assembly.
Conventional steal or fiberglass sucker Thts permits manual shut-in with the rod string at
rods may be used. API insert or tubing type pumps the extreme upstroke position. A mandrel type
are adaptable to the long stroke application,or hanger for the wellhead seal assembly Is being
epecial configuration or accessor%eamay be used developed to permit pulling the well through
to achieve mximum pump performance. tiuitableBOP equipment.

7A7
1*I
,

4 A ROD PUMPING SYSTEM FOR CALIFORNIA LIFT REQUIREMENTS SPE 11747

Heavy Oil This compact unit may also make rod pumping
a more acceptable lift method for production sites
Sucker rod pumping of unheated heavy oil having close well spacing, such as urban drill
may be hampered by an inadequate rate of rod fall sites and offshore platforms. The counterweight
on the downstoke, and incomplete pump filling on hole for the current model is spaced four feet from
the upstroke. A reduced cycle rate haa been the the wellbore. The entire unit hae maximum overall
most common means of dealing with the problem of dimensions of 3 feet wide by 7.5 feet long. The
rod fall. This mey also contribute to improved pump 4000 pound pumping unit weight would also be
filling. beneficial on platform applications.

The etroking motion of the LIFTRONIC OPERATING RESULTS


pumping unit appaara to be well suited to this
application. In thie deeign, the unit developa a Following prototype testing on a well
nearly constant polished rod velocity throughout during 1980, the current model was first installed
the stroke. This, in combinationwith the low cycle on a Loti Angeles Basin well in April, 1981. This
rate, reduces peak valocity of the rod string continues in operation, serving as a valuable
aigntficantly as compared to the constantly engineering development Installation. During this
changing velocity and higher peak imposed by the period, the well’s production has been brought from
beam type unit. Further, the reduced valve cylcles, 100% water to 15 BPD net oil with 460 BPD gross
plus the higher compression ratio developed by tha fluid.
long etroke, contribute to improved pump
diaplacament efficiency, even in the presence of Other operating installations of the
gas or steam in the pump. An installationof this LIFTRONIC system are producing welle ranging from
eyetem on high water cut haavy oil production in steam cycled heavy crude in Alberta, Canada,
the San Joaquin Valley haa demonstrated substantial unheated heavy crude in the San Joaquin Valley,
improvement in net oil production as compared to California, and light crude, hfgh water cut
the previous baam pumping system. production In the Los Angeles Basin.

Deviated Wells Performance Comparison

Wear on the rod string and tubing ia Comparison of performance of two


generally accelerated in rod pumping Installations installations in California on which conventional
on highly deviated wells. The low cycle ra<e and baam pumping eystems were replaced by the LIFTRONIC
long stroke of the new system both contribute to System are shown in Tables 3 and 4. Data gathared
reducing this wear rate. Longer service life from from both operating systems permits performance
roda and tubing should result. comparison in terms of power consumption per barrel
of fluid ltfted (KWN/BBL). This ie further
“Plain Vanilla” Wells converted to power cost per barral at local power
rates. In addition, production resulte may be used
A vary high percentage of California wells to compare pumping performance.
fall into this category in that they present no
particularly unusual pumping problems. In these Well A (Table 3)-is producing froma light
applications, the reduced energy consumption of gravity crude zone at 4200 feet. Net oil production
this naw system, aa well as the benlflts of the was increased from zero with the ten foot stroke
stroking motion, can result in lower overall beam unit to an average of 15 BPD operating with
operating coats. Reduction in power consumptionhas the thirty foot stroke LIFTRONIC. Power consumption
been measured aa high as 25Z. A 15% reduction in has been reduced by 25.9% per barrel of gross fluid
power coat alone appears to be a realistic lifted. Power cost represents 7.5Z of produced oil
expectation. revenue at 32 dollars per barrel.

Surface Restrictions The uniform shape of the LIFTRONIC


dynamometer card, as compared to that produced by
Due to the various restrfctiona at many the beam eystem, varifiee the optimized efficiency
California producing locations, rod pumping haa of the LIFTRONIC pumping unit. This is the net
been made unattractive or imposatble by the size of rasult of the desirable stroking motion establlshad
the beam unit. This restraint is the most obvloua by the new pumping unit.
to be dealt with by the new lift system. Figure 4
shows the LIFTRONIC pumping vnlt installed on the Well B (Table 3) is producing 14”API heavy
wellhead under the API 456 baatiunit it replaced. crude from a zone at 2400 feet. During operation
under the LIFTRONIC eystem, net otl production has
In many urban producing fields, the pumping been doubled over the previous rate with only a atx
installation could be made more aesthetically =—._—–— incraase in average sross production.Power
Dercent
acceptable eimply by enclosing the equipment wtthln consumption has been re~uc~d by- 20.72 per groea
a S%X foot high ecreening fence. The low profile of fluid barrel lifted. Thle power saving, combined
uncle-eight-foot installed height mskea full with increasednet oil production hae reduced power
enclosure practical if required. If the relatively cost ae a percent of oil revenue ($20 per barrel)
low operating noiee level is found objectionable, from 17Z to 72.
acoustical blankets may be used for effective
sound dampenfng. The LIFTRONIC dynamometer card from thie
well illuatrateea pumped; aff condition.

?a
---

SPE 11747 H. C. TAIT 5

CONCLUSIONS

Experience to date with operating


installations of the LIFTRONIC Pumping System has
demonstrated that performance characteriatice of
the system are meeting the original design
objectives of the developmentproject.

Measurable reductions in power consumption


have been recorded. Production records indicate
improved downhole pumping performance in t3t@SS0
enhanced production,unheated heavy crude and light
oil production. Installations in environmentally
sensitSve areas are being considered. REFERENCES

Additional operating experience Is required 1. Moore, S. D.: “Well Servicing ExpendituresTop


to further verify these results and to more fully The $4-Billion Mark,” PETROLEUM ENGINEERING
evaluate long-term raliabllityand service life of INTERNATIONAL,(July, 1982) 29-36.
the equipment in the system.
2. Tait, R. C., and Hamilton, R. M.: “A Rod Pumping
The performance and installationbeneftts System To Reduce Lifting Costs,” paper SpE 11569
of the LIFTRONIC system appear to warrant further preeented at SPE Production Operations
evaluation by Callfornta operatore. Symposium, Oklahoma City, Feb. 27-Mar. 1, 1983.

TABLE 1

LIFTRONIC SPECIFICATIONS
MODEL A12-360

PUMPING UNIT

MAXIMUM POLISHED ROD LOAD LB 12000


NOMINAL STROKE LENGTE IN 360
PUMPING SPEED RANGE SPM 105 - 3*5
GEAR REDUCER DOUBLE REDUCTION PLANETARY
MOTOR NEMAB HIGH EFFICIENCY, 460VAC,
THREE PHASE
OVERALL HEIGHT INSTALLED IN 86
WEIGHT LE 3s00

COUNTERWEIGHTASSEMSLY

MAXIMUM COUNTERBALANCE EFFECT LE 9000


COUNTERWEIGHT CASING DEPTH FT 50
COUNTERWEIGHT CASING DIAMETER IN 24
SPACING FROM WELLHEAD FT 4

SEAL ASSEMSLY

OVERALL LENGTH FT 40
OUTSIDE DIAMETER IN 4.625
POLISHED ROD DIAMETHR IN 1.5
PACKING KEVLAR SELF ADJUSTING
MARIMUNTEMPERATURE
STANDARD “F 250
OPTIONAL “F 650
MAXIMUMPRESSURE PSI 700

749
*

TABLE 2

NOMINALPUMPDISPLACBMSNT*
AND DEPTHLYMIT
PUHPBORE PUMPINGSPEED (SPM) DEPTS(FT.)
(IN)
1.s 2.0 2.5 3*O 3.s
( DISP?MEMENT6~BPD )
1.25 98 130 196 228 6000
1.50 140 1S6 233 2s0 326 5350
1.75 193 257 321 3S6 450 4750
2.00 251 334 41s 502 585 4200
2.25 318 424 530 636 742 3750
2.50 393 524 655 7S6 917 3300
2.7S 475 633 792 950 1108 2950
3.25 665 886 1108 1330 1550 2700
3.75 885 1180 1475 1770 2065 1750
~ AT 100%DISPLACBMBNT EFFICIENCY.
NOTB:API 66 ROD STR2NG1.25”7SRU 2.75”PUMPBORE.
API 76 ROD STRING 3.25”TliRU3.75”PUMPBORE.

TABLE 3 TABLE 4

PERFORMANCE
COMPARISON PERFORMANCE
COMPARISON

WSLL A HELL B
BEAHUNIT LIFTRONIC
—— %SAM UNIT LIPTRONIC

C-456D-265-120 A12-360 C-228-213-120 A12-360

CONDITIONS CONDITIONS

PUHP DEPTS 4265’ 4218* PUMP DEPTE 2230‘ 2358’

Pm BORE 1-314” ,“
L PUMP BORE 2-1/4” 2-3/4”

ROD STRLHG API 76 API 76 ROD STRING API 66 Am 66

STRORELENGTS 120” 360” STRORELENGTH 120” 360”

PUMPINGSPEED 11 SPM 2.9 SPM PUMPINGSPEED 13.5sPhl 3.1 SPM

MOTORSIZE 25 SP 25 BP MOTORSIZE 40 EP 25 BP

PERFOWCE PERFORMANCE

AVG PRODUCTION 358 BPD 427 BPD AVG PRODUCTION 790 BED 840 BPD

AVG OIL PRODUCTION -o- 1S BPD AVG OIL PRODUCTION 9 BPD 19 BPD

AVt3POHERCONSUMPTION 1031RWB/BBL .97KU8/BBL AVG POWER CONSUMPTION ,454KWE/BBL .360SHS/BBL

POWERCOSTPERBARR2L .l14$/BBL .084$/BBL PONSRCOST PER BARREL .040GrBBL .031$IBBL

DYNAMONETZR
CARD DYNAMOMETER
CARD

BEAM
UNIT
w

H-m
Fig. 1-TyPIcd Lhx!c in?ta[laluon

.“

Ih OOWNHOLE
PUMP

TANDINQ
VALVE

Fig. 2-LfftrOnic tnafallalionarrangement


. .. .. .. . .. .. = .
+ ,5s

“.

‘i!

L
‘...

.’.

,.
. .

. .

>&‘:
./’” “.-’
/’-.,\...,!,

~ l\-147

Вам также может понравиться