Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
When it comes to influence, the educational system of the Philippines has been affected immensely by the
country's colonial history including the Spanish period, American period, and Japanese rule and occupation.
Although having been significantly influenced by all its colonizers with regard to the educational system, the
most influential and deep-rooted contributions arose during the American occupation (1898); it was during
this aforementioned period that 1. English was introduced as the primary language of instruction and 2. A
public education system was first established - a system specifically patterned after the United States school
system and further administered by the newly established Department of Instruction. Similar to the United
States of America, the Philippines has had an extensive and extremely inclusive system of education
including features such as higher education.
The present Philippine Educational system firstly covers six years of compulsory education (from grades 1 to
6), divided informally into two levels - both composed of three years. The first level is known as the Primary
Level and the second level is known as the Intermediate Level.
However, although the Philippine educational system has extensively been a model for other Southeast
Asian countries, in recent years such a matter has no longer stood true, and such a system has been
deteriorated - such a fact is especially evident and true in the country's more secluded poverty-stricken
regions.
Nationwide the Philippines faces several issues when it comes to the educational system.
Quality of Education
First of which, is the quality of education. In the year 2014, the National Achievement Test (NAT) and the
National Career Assessment Examination (NCAE) results show that there had been a decline in the quality of
Philippine education at the elementary and secondary levels. The students' performance in both the 2014
NAT and NCAE were excessively below the target mean score. Having said this, the poor quality of the
Philippine educational system is manifested in the comparison of completion rates between highly urbanized
city of Metro Manila, which is also happens to be not only the country's capital but the largest metropolitan
area in the Philippines and other places in the country such as Mindanao and Eastern Visayas. Although
Manila is able to boast a primary school completion rate of approximately 100 percent, other areas of the
nation, such as Eastern Visayas and Mindanao, hold primary school completion rate of only 30 percent or
even less. This kind of statistic is no surprise to the education system in the Philippine context, students who
hail from Philippine urban areas have the financial capacity to complete at the very least their primary
school education.
Affordability of Education
The third prevalent issue the Philippine educational system continuously encounters is the affordability of
education (or lack thereof). A big disparity in educational achievements is evident across various social
groups. Socioeconomically disadvantaged students otherwise known as students who are members of high
and low-income poverty-stricken families, have immensely higher drop-out rates in the elementary level.
Additionally, most freshmen students at the tertiary level come from relatively well-off families.
Brain Drain
Brain Drain is a persistent problem evident in the educational system of the Philippines due to the modern
phenomenon of globalization, with the number of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) who worked abroad at
any time during the period April to September 2014 was estimated at 2.3 million. This ongoing mass
emigration subsequently inducts an unparalleled brain drain alongside grave economic implications.
Additionally, Philippine society hitherto is footing the bill for the education of millions who successively spend
their more productive years abroad. Thus, the already poor educational system of the Philippines indirectly
subsidizes the opulent economies who host the OFWs.
Social Divide
There exists a problematic and distinct social cleavage with regard to educational opportunities in the
country. Most modern societies have encountered an equalizing effect on the subject of education. This
aforementioned divide in the social system has made education become part of the institutional mechanism
that creates a division between the poor and the rich.
Undersecretary Juan Miguel Luz, reportedly over 17 million students are enrolled in Philippine public schools,
and at an annual population growth rate of 2.3 per cent, about 1.7 million babies are born every year which
means that in a few years time, more individuals will assert ownership over their share of the (limited)
educational provisions. To sum it up, there are too many students and too little resources. Albeit the claims
the government makes on increasing the allocated budget for education, there is a prevalent difficulty the
public school system faces with regard to shortages. Furthermore, state universities and colleges gradually
raise tuition so as to have a means of purchasing facilities, thus making tertiary education difficult to access
or more often than not, inaccessible to the poor. However, it is worth taking note of what the Aquino
administration has done in its five years of governance with regard to classroom-building - the number of
classrooms built from 2005 to the first half of the year 2010 has tripled. Additionally, the number of
classrooms that were put up from the year 2010 to February 2015 was recorded to be at 86,478,
significantly exceeding the 17,305 classrooms that were built from 2005 to 2010 and adequate enough to
counterbalance the 66,800 classroom deficit in the year 2010.
In President Aquino's fourth state of the nation address (SONA), he spoke of the government's achievement
of zero backlog in facilities such as classrooms, desks and chairs, and textbooks which has addressed the
gap in the shortages of teachers, what with 56,085 new teachers for the 61, 510 teaching items in the year
2013. However, the data gathered by the Department of Education shows that during the opening of classes
(June 2013), the shortages in classrooms was pegged at 19, 579, 60 million shortages when it came to
textbooks, 2.5 million shortages with regard to chairs, and 80, 937 shortages of water and sanitation
facilities. Furthermore, 770 schools in Metro Manila, Cebu, and Davao were considered overcrowded. The
Department of Education also released data stating that 91% of the 61, 510 shortages in teachers was filled
up alongside appointments (5, 425 to be specific) are being processed