Unit 5 - Lesson 10 Learning outcomes: Discuss the strengths and limitations of legislation, nudges, subsidies, educational awareness and direct government provision with respect to: (AO3)
● Difficulties in measurement of the externalities.
● Degree of effectiveness ● Impact on the stakeholders Direct Government Provision and Subsidies Both Direct Government Provision and Subsidies are popular and effective ways to address the underallocation of resources associated with Positive Externalities.
Direct Government Provision increases
the quantity from (Qfm) to (Qso).
Direct Government Provision aides in
decreasing the price from (Pfm) to (Pc) Direct Government Provision and Subsidies
Subsidies have the same impact as
Direct Government Provision by incentivizing the producer to increase the quantity produced from (Qfm) to (Qso) resulting in a decrease in price the consumer pays from (Pfm) to (Pc).
Subsidies also increase the price the
producer receives from (Pfm) to (Pso) resulting in an increase in revenue for the producer of the goods. Direct Government Provision and Subsidies Limitations of Direct Government Provision and Subsidies Direct government provision and subsidies require governments to use tax revenue collected from society. Since it is not possible to fund all programs that are deemed desirable to society, the government must make a choice on what programs to fund, which ones not to fund and how much to fund. These choices result in opportunity costs. Governments should fund programs based on an economic criteria related to the social benefits gained to the social cost to provide them. By basing it on an economic criteria the goal is to fund the program with the most amount of social benefit relative to the cost. However, it is very difficult to measure the positive benefits of each program and therefore it is hard to choose which program to fund and how much to fund the program. Direct Government Provision and Subsidies
Limitations of Direct Government Provision and Subsidies
● Political pressure on leaders is a challenge as some politicians make the choice of what program to fund and how much to fund it based on politics rather than economic criteria.
Policies such as Direct Government Provision and Subsidies are
beneficial in lowering the price the consumer pays and in the case of subsidies increasing the price the producer receives. This decrease in price paid for by the consumer incentivizes consumers to increase the quantity demanded in the market moving closer to the socially optimal quantity. Nudges
Nudges are designed to try and influence
individuals to make choices that are deemed socially desirable. ○ Examples include the creation of bike lanes and graphic photos on cigarette packaging. If nudges work influencing consumers to make socially desirable choices it will result in a increase in MPB moving it closer to MSB resulting in a increase in quantity from Qfm to Qso. Advantages and Limitations of Nudges There may be difficulties in designing Nudges to effectively influence consumers of demerit goods to make socially desirable choices. Behavioural Economics and Nudges are relatively new so knowing how consumers will react to Nudges and Choice Architecture is relatively limited. Also, Nudges may not have the same effect across income and cultural groups thus reducing the effect. Overall, the use of subsidies, direct government provision and nudges will not realistically increase the quantity in the market to the socially optimal quantity because of the limitations mentioned before. It is effective in reducing the underallocation of resources in the market and helps reduce the underprovision of the good. Legislation and Educational Awareness Legislation and Educational Awareness ● Face the same challenges as subsidies and direct government provision in that it is very difficult to measure the external benefits society gains from the production or consumption of a good. ● Legislation and Educational Awareness are effective at increasing the MPB (shift right) closer to the socially optimal quantity, but not completely eliminate the underallocation of resources. ● Legislation and Educational Awareness are effective in some cases such as mandatory schooling age and not as effective in others. ● Another drawback is the increase in MPB = D caused by these type of policies result in an increase in price thus making it unaffordable for some households. Legislation and Educational Awareness
Legislation and Educational Awareness
Legislation and Educational Awareness are effective tools in helping to increase the demand (MPB = D) for goods and services that have positive external benefits for society, however they increase the price of the good or services thus making it unaffordable to lower income households. Therefore, to combat this increase in price and further influence the quantity in the market, governments should complement these policies with subsidies or direct government provision.
In short a combination of policies is the best way to address the
underallocation and under-provision of goods deemed to have positive external benefits for society.