Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
for SMEs
M e n t o r i n g B u s i n e ss T r a n s f e r
This brochure presents the results of the pilot action “A Helping Hand for SMEs –
Mentoring Business Transfer” financed by the European Commission.
The project lasted 33 months, from January 2007 until August 2009.
The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Communities.
Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the authors.
Table of contentS
Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Results of the pilot action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1. Overview of the businesses sampled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.1. Geographical background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.2. Date of creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3. Size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.4. Economic sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2. Overview of the buyers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1. Age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2. Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.3. Professional status prior to the takeover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3. The takeover process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4. The difficulties faced by the buyers prior to the mentoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5. The mentoring process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6. Conclusion and recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.1. A service that should be continued at national or regional level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6.2. Recommendations for entities willing to set up the service in their country or region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Portraits of 10 European buyers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Daniel Reiner, Austria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Stanimir Svatovski, Bulgaria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Alain Capon, France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Burkhard Huhle, Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
André Stascheit, Hungary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Laura Pavan, Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Monica Pedersen, The Netherlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Roxana Carmen Coca, Romania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Jožica Molka, Slovenia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Christian Sánchez Amores, Spain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Project partners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
r d
w o This is why, at the initiative of the European Parliament, we
Fo
through mentoring.
Business transfer boosts the growth of existing successful Chambers welcome the recognition of the value of business
companies and introduces new ideas and new procedures transfer by the European Commission. We call on national
which can, in turn, lead to enhanced productivity and economic authorities to attach equal importance to business transfer as
performance. It also has an immediate positive impact on to business creation; measures must be delivered to create
employment, since successfully transferred businesses preserve a business transfer friendly environment, as recommended in
more jobs on average than those created by new start-ups . 1
the Small Business Act.
Alessandro Barberis
President
EUROCHAMBRES
1
A “Small Business Act” for Europe, COM(2008) 394, 18 June 2008
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
Business transfer is an issue of major importance in the European Union, with one in three company owners expected to retire
within the next decade, affecting an annual average of 690,000 small and medium-sized businesses and representing almost 2.8
million jobs.
Although many European countries have put in place various measures to ensure smooth transfers and takeovers of
businesses, the process still involves considerable challenges which lead many of these transactions to fail (more than
20% of transfers in Europe fail within five years).
The European pilot post-takeover mentoring project, ‘A Helping Hand for SMEs – Mentoring Business Transfer’, was unique in
two ways: it covered 18 European countries simultaneously and worked with entrepreneurs after the transfer had taken place.
6 The initial aim of this far-reaching project was to provide free support to 1,000 buyers of small businesses (less than
50 employees) in 18 European countries, each for a ten-day period.
1. Assessment of the buyer’s needs and co-development of an action plan with the mentee (1/2 day);
2. Tailor-made mentoring programme of 9.5 days allocated freely to cover 1 or more of the 9 topics on offer: marketing and
commerce, accounting, strategic management, human resources, access to finance, technical know-how, legal and fiscal
aspects, IT and supply chain management;
This brochure presents the main results of the pilot action as well as testimonials of ten European entrepreneurs having
successfully participated in the programme.
Results of the pilot action
7
The following paragraphs describe the businesses taken over in terms of country, size, date of
creation and sector of activity.
8
National breakdown of businesses sampled
216
207
185
1.1. Geographical
background
a
ly
ce
ia
ia
ry
nd
ta
l
in
ce
ga
nd
an
i
ki
tri
ni
Ita
tv
an
ar
a
ga
do
iu
al
an
la
ee
va
ve
Sp
rtu
s
La
m
M
lg
lg
rla
m
Au
Po
un
ng
Fr
o
Bu
Be
er
Po
Ro
he
Sl
Sl
Ki
G
et
d
N
te
e
ni
Th
U
1.2 Date of creation 1.3. Size
From 20 to
Before 1960 50 employees
5% 3.8 % From 10 to
Between 1960 19 employees
and 1980 9.2 %
14.5 %
The following paragraphs outline the profiles of the 889 buyers who received support throughout the project.
Before 1970
3.8 %
After 1970
2.1. Age
Between 1950 and 1970
49% of the sample was made
up of people under 39; the
Before 1949
under-30s accounted for 17.1%.
After 1970 The buyers’ average age was 40.
49.0 %
Between 1950
and 1970
47.2 %
2.2. Gender Male
Female
40.2 %
The proportion of male and femaleFemale
entrepreneurs participating in the
scheme was relatively balanced, with the
sample being made up of 60% men and
Male
59.8% 40% women.
12
Jobless
2.3. Professional status 12.0 %
prior to the takeover
Executive
The majority of buyers were 13.6 %
employees prior to the takeover Employee
51.2%
(51.2%) and 23.2% were already
entrepreneurs. Executives
accounted for 13.6% and job-
seekers for 12%.
Entrepreneur
23.2%
Results of the pilot action
3. The takeover process
Former employee
13.3 % External
Family
Type of takeover
Former
External takeovers
External Family
62.2% were the most frequent,
24.5 %
accounting for 62.2%
of the sample. Of those,
three quarters of the
businesses were unknown
to the buyer prior to
the transaction. Family
takeovers came second,
The type of takeover varied greatly from one country to the next. Family transfers accounted for more than half of all cases representing 24.5% of the
in Austria (55.6 %) and in Greece (66.7%), but less than 15% for a core of seven countries, including France and Spain. transactions. Takeovers
by an employee, on the
Takeovers by a former employee were significant in five countries (Bulgaria 20%, Slovakia 31.6%, Slovenia 35.3%, other hand, were rare,
Belgium 37.5% and the Netherlands 38.9%), but were non-existent in seven countries (Austria, Germany, Greece, Latvia, accounting for only 13.3%
Malta, Portugal and the United Kingdom). of the transactions.
4. The difficulties faced by the buyers PRIOR TO THE MENTORING
The main difficulties faced by the buyers sampled were in the areas of accounting and finance, access to finance, human resources
management, legal, fiscal aspects and strategic management.
These difficulties were more pronounced for women than for men. They were also greater for young buyers with little professional
experience and when the business taken over was a young, sole proprietorship active in the non-food retail sector.
Average 5.44
IT systems 5.33
Marketing & commerce 5.26
mentoring
The three areas of mentoring most selected were: marketing and commerce (26% of the mentoring days provided), accounting
and finance (19%) and strategic management (17%). The least requested topic was supply chain management (2%).
Technical know-how 5 %
I
Breakdown of days by mentoring topic
L
Access to finance 10 %
A Human resources 13 %
Accounting and finance 19 %
S
Strategic management 17 %
A
6. Conclusion and recommendations
The European pilot project “A Helping Hand for SMEs – Mentoring Business Transfer” can be considered as a good practice.
It allowed testing on a relatively large scale (18 EU countries) of a new support scheme helping buyers to overcome post-
takeover difficulties through the transfer of knowledge and core competencies essential for business transfers.
After 33 months of implementation, it can be concluded that the mentoring service should be
6.1. CONCLUSION continued for the following reasons:
16
• Business transfer is an issue of major importance in Europe, with one in three company
Such a mentoring service directors expected to retire within the coming decade in the European Union, potentially
should be implemented at affecting 2.8 million jobs.
national or regional level in
order to adapt the service • There is a demand for mentoring from the owners of small enterprises.
to the local specificities in
• The service is innovative: until now, European countries have put in place various measures
terms of profile of the mentees
essentially geared towards providing support upstream from transactions (i.e. reduction of
and profile of the business
administrative, legal, fiscal or regulatory difficulties and support schemes during the transfer
transferred.
process).
• Both the Chambers of Commerce and the buyers who participated in the project are satisfied:
79% of the Chambers are satisfied with the pilot action and the mentees considered
the mentoring useful with a degree of satisfaction of 1.97 on a scale of 1 (very useful) to
5 (not useful).
6.2. Recommendations
Flexibility is key to attracting candidates to the programme and to enabling the buyers
to take part.
• Duration: the reasonable duration of the mentoring should be defined according to
the specific situation of the enterprise and the entrepreneur. It should be flexible,
between 5 and 10 days for instance, and determined by the adviser, together with the
entrepreneur. An initial number of days could be decided during the first session of the
mentoring, which would then be revised if necessary.
• Period to offer the mentoring: a mixed formula (some sessions before and some
after the takeover) is recommended, leaving the possibility to the mentor to decide,
together with the mentee, the appropriate schedule of the sessions according to the
entrepreneur’s specific situation.
• The mentoring should not be restricted to entrepreneurs who have just taken over a company
(i.e. one year), but should target entrepreneurs in their first years (i.e. from one to five years)
after the takeover and those who are about to acquire a company.
• Format: the use of various formats for the mentoring (i.e. plenary sessions on specific
topics, workshops with a small number of entrepreneurs, phone calls and e-learning)
would complement the one-to-one sessions, adding value to the service.
3. Content of the mentoring
For this project, nine mentoring topics divided into 35 sub-topics were on offer, namely:
accounting, business strategy, financing difficulties, fiscal and legal aspects, human
resource management, IT systems, logistics, marketing and commerce and technical
know-how.
The results of the project reveal that the list of topics on offer should be refined and
reduced. The mentoring should focus primarily on the following four topics: accounting
and finance, strategic management, human resource and access to finance. These areas
18 were considered to be the most problematic by the mentees and were chosen by the
majority of the participants.
This list of core topics could be complemented by “marketing and commerce” which
was the most chosen subject, while noting that it is not an area directly linked to the
difficulties of taking over a business.
“Legal and fiscal aspects” should be dropped from the list of topics on offer as the
buyers often work with a specialist on these aspects, which are generally very specific
and confidential.
Portraits of 10 European buyers
Portraits of 10 European buyers 19
This section portrays entrepreneurs from ten EU countries who have taken over a small business between
2007 and 2009.
With refreshing openness, these women and men give us insight into the obstacles and challenges that they faced
when taking over the company, the benefits that the project brought to them and their plans for the future. These
real-world examples show the diversity of business transfers and the need for an early, customised support.
I A
S TR
A U
With guidance comes confidence
In the Austrian city of Voitsberg, 26 year-old Daniel Reiner He also covered topics such as accounting and finance as well as
took over Fleischerei Jöbstl, a butcher’s shop created in 1977.
Before acquiring the ownership of the company in 2007, Daniel
human resource management. “The mentoring helped me to gain
confidence in running my company. It brought me quality support
Daniel
20 had been an employee for five years. in management, financial, accounting and human resources Reiner
matters; competences that will prove invaluable to ensure the
Despite having worked in the meat trade for several years, sustainability of my businesses,” said Daniel of the programme.
Daniel hadn’t enough experience in the administrative field Age: 26
to know how to manage his business efficiently and, in Company name: Fleischerei Jöbstl
particular, its accounting and finance procedures, which Year of take over: 2007
were crucial for the success and viability of the enterprise.
40. Hauptplatz
In addition, he became responsible for two staff members
8570 Voitsberg, Autria
and one apprentice. It was thus essential for him to also gain
Tel: +43 664 54 17 914
knowledge in human resource management in order to provide
reiner.daniel@inode.at
a safe work environment for his employees.
21
23