Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Kay Gallagher
To cite this article: Kay Gallagher (2011) Becoming and re‐becoming a teacher in the
Arabian Peninsula: Amal’s story of hope, Teacher Development, 15:2, 141-155, DOI:
10.1080/13664530.2011.571491
Teacher
10.1080/13664530.2011.571491
1366-4530
Original
Taylor
202011
15
kayg@hku.hk
KayGallagher
00000May
&Development
Article
Francis
(print)/1747-5120
2011 (online)
This paper is an account of the early career narrative of a young Emirati teacher,
Amal, against the backdrop of the radical reformation of state schooling underway
in the United Arab Emirates. Amal’s decision to become a teacher was influenced
by negative school experiences in her own childhood, thus fuelling her desire to
‘have a hand in changing things’. Although one of the very first of her compatriots
to acquire an appropriate initial English language teaching qualification, within a
few years of starting to teach she finds her qualification obsolete. Amal’s story of
becoming and re-becoming a teacher offers unique insights into the shifting sands
of school reform and the challenges it poses to local teachers, and highlights the
need for capacity building for a sustainable, locally grounded, quality state school
system.
Keywords: United Arab Emirates; teacher education; school reform; teacher
narrative
1. Introduction
This paper is an interpretive biographical narrative of the first decade in the teach-
ing life of a young teacher in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Narratives do not
exist in a vacuum, but are shaped by the social and historical contexts in which they
are told (Bell 2002), and this story tells what it is like to become a teacher of
English in a place and time of unprecedented education reform, where until very
recently teaching had languished in a ‘pre-professional’ era, in Hargreaves’ (2000)
typology, but is now being reconceptualised within a radically revamped state
school system. It recounts what it is like to become and then re-become a teacher, in
order to keep abreast of this rapidly changing educational environment, and to strive
to teach in an elite international private school as a minority national citizen in a
country where expatriates outnumber citizens by five to one, and where half of the
resident children are educated in the non-state sector (Ministry of Information and
Culture 2010).
This narrative offers an insight from the Arabian Peninsula into the education of
teachers as ‘emerging out of and through experiences in social context: as learners in
classrooms and schools, as participants in professional teacher education programs,
and later as teachers in the settings where they work’ (Johnson 2006, 239). The story
has features in common with the story of other young Emirati teachers, as well as its
*Email: kayg@hku.hk
own unique features, which combine to illuminate many of the issues and debates
within the often turbulent reforms of the education system in the UAE today. But it
has wider resonances too, relating as it does to the global discourse on issues of
teacher identity and teacher qualifications amidst the demands for standardisation and
performativity wrought by globalisation. In terms of teaching trajectories today, there
is no longer a predetermined career life script (Bathmaker and Harnett 2010), and the
young teacher portrayed here must carve out her own path through the shifting sands
of educational reform.
2. Background
The teacher is called Amal, not her real name, and not only to contribute to anonym-
ity, but also because amal means ‘hope’ in Arabic and to teach is to have hope (Bell
2002; Halpin 2003; Van Manen 1991). Or indeed, closely related to hope, to teach is
to have ‘soul’, as Amal herself puts it. Thinking about what it takes to be a teacher,
she says: ‘It’s the soul of the person that makes teaching alive, really. That’s what
you’re feeding to the students. All that liveliness you’re putting in, all that knowl-
edge. Making it meaningful.’ Amal’s story is told here as a series of metamorphoses
undergone through her experiences in her first decade of being and becoming a
teacher.
This paper draws its data specifically upon three lengthy in-depth interviews
over the course of the last 10 years, and also draws upon personal email communi-
cation. Because of Amal’s fluency in English, and the researcher’s lack of compe-
tence in Arabic, our communication has all been conducted in English.
As a teacher educator who has been involved professionally with some of the
first generation of Emirati teachers of English for primary schools, in a society
where parallel rather than intersecting lives are lived by the various social group-
ings, and where the indigenous people constitute less than 20% of the population
(albeit a powerful minority, at the top of the socioeconomic scale), I am privi-
leged to give voice to Amal’s story. It is acknowledged that in so doing, I am in
some senses taking over her voice; however this is mitigated by her involvement:
Amal reviewed the transcripts of all of our conversations, asking for the removal
of some aspects, and reviewed and suggested amendments to a draft of this
paper.
3. Educational reform
Johnson (2009) observes that because teachers’ narratives are constructed in
particular social and institutional settings, they are not neutral but are constitutive
of those settings. The bisection of Amal’s early career story with an intense period
of reformation of state schooling reveals insights from a young teacher’s perspec-
tive into some of the critical classroom and school issues in that reform. Like many
countries globally, as portrayed for instance by Earnest and Treagust (2006), the
UAE is engaged in wide-ranging educational reform; unlike most other countries,
however, this is simultaneously occurring within a societal context of exceptional
socioeconomic and cultural transformations; transformations so dramatic that they
have been described as ‘unprecedented in the history of civilization in terms of
scale or speed’ (Bashur 2010, 253), and occurring within a country which ‘does
not fit ordinary norms’ (Heard-Bey 2005, 358). The phenomenon of rapid trans-
Teacher Development 143
formation in all spheres of public life that has been embraced by the UAE in the
past two decades has been well documented, in particular by Davidson (2005,
2008, 2009). In this regard, it is worth bearing in mind that many of Amal’s
generation are first-in-the-family college entrants whose grandparents are likely to
have been semiliterate, and whose mothers may not have completed secondary
school (Sharpes et al. 2005), and therefore the educational strides being made are
enormous.
As a progressive young country, currently oil rich but looking several decades
ahead to a post-fossil fuel era, the UAE aims to establish itself as a knowledge-
based economy (Ministry of Information and Culture 2005), and in so doing,
aspires to develop ‘a world class education system that supports all learners in
reaching their full potential to compete in the global market’ (Abu Dhabi Education
Council 2010). These aspirations notwithstanding, critical evaluation of the educa-
tion system has forced a belated focus on primary and secondary state school
education after years of benign neglect, and since 2005 the school system has been
undergoing a period of radical transformation, encompassing curricular, pedagogi-
cal, infrastructural, and administrative reforms (Macpherson, Kachelhoffer, and
ElNemr 2007).
5. Significance
Amal’s story of becoming and re-becoming a teacher is worth telling for many
reasons. First, in its portrayal of the teaching life of a young Gulf woman, it offers a
144 K. Gallagher
rare glimpse into some of the triumphs and tribulations in the career of an Emirati
teacher. Secondly, in touching places and people beyond the Gulf, Amal’s story
underscores how human self-understanding is increasingly lived in tension between
the local and the global, ‘between my understanding of myself as a person of this place
and my emerging yet profound awareness that this place participates in a reality
heavily influenced by, and implicated in, larger pictures’ (Smith 2003, 50, emphasis
in original). Her story augments the sparse accounts of the lived professional lives of
individual teachers of English from diverse contexts, thus expanding the knowledge
base of English language teaching ‘in its multiple professional realisations’ (Hayes
2010, 58).
Although some features of Amal’s story are unique to her, many of her experi-
ences are shared with other Emirati teachers of her generation who have also been
interviewed by the author; indeed the collective sense of a community as young
teachers-in-the-making is evident in Amal’s frequent use of the plural pronouns
‘we’ and ‘us’ to describe her experiences during her undergraduate studies. While
there are now many young Emirati women like her with an appropriate initial
teaching qualification, there are however few to have forged ahead and actively
sought out continuing academic and professional development to the extent that
Amal has done. It must also be acknowledged that there are some who will never
be allowed to pursue further studies abroad, or even work locally as teachers, due
to family disapproval for a professional life outside of the home; for, as Bristol-
Rhys (2008, 108) explains, there are many young female Emiratis who ‘have
watched their dreams of graduate studies evaporate before their eyes as fathers have
intervened’.
Another frustration for her was the pedagogy employed by teachers in her school-
days, which was dominated by teacher-transmitted rote learning and memorisation,
and Amal vividly recalls feeling frustrated by this as a learner:
In geography this used to really bug me. We learnt the properties of thirty minerals, for
example, but we never actually saw them … not even pictures! Never! We used to
memorise the lesson, then we’d come to class and the teacher would ask us to repeat it
– and that was the lesson. Every lesson! And that’s not just one subject … it was every
subject. Really, here they treat the child as a passive learner. They need more critical
thinking.
Another remembered difficulty for Amal as a school child was the language
awareness of her English teachers: ‘They used to say really weird words, like
“gov-er-nee-ment” for government. I couldn’t understand them and they couldn’t
understand me … so I just talked like them!’ Untenured, and receiving little or no
professional development, her teachers – at that time mostly expatriates from the
wider region – may not have possessed the level of spoken proficiency in English
as an additional language that she herself had acquired.
Despite (or perhaps because of) these negative experiences as a school pupil, Amal
decided to train to become a teacher herself upon leaving school.
(fusa), due to the fact of Arabic diglossia where two varieties of the same language are
used (Ferguson 1959/2003). In his study of language in education in the UAE, Al
Sharhan (2007) portrays the challenges of acquiring literacy in Arabic due to the inter-
play between three varieties of Arabic that young Emirati learners must master: the
colloquial spoken Arabic of the Gulf, the modern standard Arabic that is the medium
of instruction in schools and the language of written media, and the classical Arabic
necessary for reading the Koran. As an undergraduate student teacher of English,
Amal explained why developing further competence in modern standard Arabic was
important not just for her, but for all future teachers in the state school system:
If we look at what teachers need for teaching here in the UAE, I think we would have to
have an Arabic course. It’s really important. All the meetings are in fusa. You don’t want
to sound like you’re talking slang in the local dialect. Like when visitors come (referring
to officials from the Ministry of Education), they all speak fusa. So it would sound bad
not to be able to speak properly or write a report in it.
All the teachers in that school came from different universities, and we had no shared
understanding of what a good school is or what a good school has. We didn’t have a
system in the school … there was no whole-school approach for anything. I remember
on some occasions when I went to the school principal and said we need a whole-school
approach for discipline, she was like, ‘Everybody does their own thing; everybody has
their strengths and their weaknesses and you work with that.’ And I was like, ‘Some
things don’t work unless you have a whole-school approach, like for discipline.’ And
Teacher Development 147
there were some other things; like in planning. We could have done it better if we’d done
it consistently through the grades.
This resonates with research by Alwan (2007) showing that teachers in state
schools in the UAE are dissatisfied with their working conditions. Amal was to gain
necessary space in which to reflect on and understand these whole-school issues
through her next challenge: studying for a part-time Master’s degree in education
while still teaching full time and raising her young daughter.
9. Metamorphosis 4: ‘If I’m not learning anything new, I feel spiritually dead’
In reviewing the literature on the phases in the career trajectories of teachers, Day
observes that after the beginning teacher period, a sense of teaching mastery is likely
to have been established by most teachers, and this is a time when ‘many teachers are
likely to seek new challenges’ (1999, 62). In her second year of teaching, Amal
decided to begin studying for a part-time Master’s degree in education offered locally
by an overseas university. As she explained, ‘I enjoy learning. If I’m not learning
anything new I feel spiritually dead. That’s what keeps me alive as a person. I love
learning,’ she repeated. ‘I like to talk about learning, I like reflecting about learning.’
The two-and-a-half-year MEd programme was delivered in a blended learning format
whereby lecturers travelled to the UAE to teach intensive sessions, supplemented by
online resources and online interaction, and augmented by face-to-face support from
a team of locally based tutors. An instance of the benefits of the globalisation of higher
education for those on the ‘periphery’, and especially valuable for females in tradi-
tional societies for whom postgraduate study abroad is not always possible or permis-
sible for cultural reasons, the programme brought quality international postgraduate
education directly to Amal.
She was particularly enthusiastic about the MEd module in educational leadership,
as it helped her to make sense of what she perceived as the ‘chaos in all the schools’:
I found the leadership module the most interesting. That’s when I saw how things can be
done differently; how things can be planned through policies to prevent the chaos that
we had in our school. It’s the same chaos in all schools. It’s just a matter of training, basi-
cally, and having shared understanding between all the staff. And having a leadership
that will make sure that everybody is doing what they’re supposed to be doing.
teach English as a subject, but would also teach mathematics and science through the
medium of English. This would be a radical change in the state school system wherein
English had been previously taught as a foreign language, but would now become a
medium of instruction rather than just a subject of instruction in state schools.
Unexpectedly, then, within a mere four years of qualifying with the country’s
first tailor-made BEd degree in teaching English, Amal found her innovative
specialist degree in effect obsolete, due to the planned switch to English as a medium
of instruction. She would need to become qualified to teach mathematics and science
also if she were to survive, it seemed, and so she began to feel uncertain about her
future as a primary school teacher of English. She was also feeling suspicious of
‘foreign supervisors who have just come into the country’, and wondered, like many
of the extant teachers who worked in the schools, if they were going to ‘impose their
culture’ on what had been until then an exclusively Arabic-speaking school
environment.
While pondering her future within this revamped school system, she heard about
a scholarship opportunity for Emiratis to study for a Post Graduate Certificate in
Education (PGCE) in primary school teaching abroad. On return to the UAE, success-
ful students would be given a teaching position in an elite, private school. She applied
for this scholarship, was accepted, and went off to study overseas.
Uprooted from her home, her family and her familiar culture, it was a very chal-
lenging year for Amal. ‘It has been a difficult and long year, but most worthwhile,’
she wrote in an e-mail towards the end of that academic year. ‘It’s a really good
programme, but I found it very stressful at times.’ Looking back later, she spoke about
how tough she had found the winter away from the UAE: ‘It was grey all the time; I
missed my daughter; I was finding the course hard; my teacher didn’t like me; it was
dark so early; I was on medication.’ In fact, she had made huge sacrifices in going
abroad to study: she had to leave her young daughter behind in the good care of her
by then ex-husband (who was supportive of her studies) when she discovered the cost
of childcare abroad, flying back and forth every few months to see her.
Although other young compatriot teachers were offered a place in the overseas
PGCE, in the end it was only Amal who took up the challenge. She believes that it isn’t
possible to have any significant numbers of female Emirati studying teacher education
abroad, not only due to cultural restrictions on females travelling unaccompanied by
a male relative, but also because she wonders whether ‘other [Emirati] students would
be able to fit in’. It is perhaps worth noting here that she reported no negative experi-
ences of being racialised while abroad, unlike the experiences of male students from
the Gulf as reported for instance by Rich and Troudi (2006).
Her year abroad was a major challenge for Amal, especially the cultural challenges
involved in teaching in schools during the lengthy mandatory practicum periods. ‘I’m
not familiar with the culture,’ she explained. ‘All the other student teachers had been
through the system themselves, and had been teaching assistants in schools.’ She
found it particularly challenging dealing with the pupils because ‘These students act
differently. They’re more opinionated. You have to treat them differently.’ Not only
that, but there were linguistic challenges too: she had to ‘learn colloquialisms to
understand the students in school. I couldn’t understand some of the things they were
saying,’ she said. And there were context-specific challenges to overcome, including
lack of prior knowledge about such topics as reading a train timetable, or indeed famil-
iarity with English literature, which, as Amal points out, is a ‘main part of the curric-
ulum and of social identity’.
Teacher Development 149
The discourse on English language teaching in the Gulf is replete with disapproval
by observers for the predominance of rote learning and memorisation in classrooms
(for example, Loughrey et al. 1999; Saunders and Quirke 2002; Syed 2003). While
Amal was highly critical of the rote learning which she herself was subjected to at
school, as we saw earlier, she was equally bemused by what she saw as an over-
emphasis on imagination in the overseas curriculum. It is somewhat salutary to hear
the wry remarks she has made as an observer from the Arab world about the pedagogy
in the western classroom, and here she describes her reaction to an idea for developing
creativity presented at a workshop she attended:
There was a lot of creativity, but sometimes they relied too heavily upon the imagina-
tion. I was at a seminar, and it was the strangest lesson I ever heard about. They actually
did a whole week; they wanted to try it out, to see how they could link the curriculum to
doing fully imaginative work. So they got a cardboard egg … of course these are foun-
dation year students … and they looked at the eggs, and it was under a tree, in a nest,
and then they had a monster coming in and they photographed the monster and it was
supposed to be a real imaginary situation where they went out into the open yard – and
they based all their lessons on that. They said that they would do a lesson plan based
upon what the students said, and what they wanted to do, and how they were going to do
the writing, so I thought that that was a bit too over the top. So, there was too much
imagination; also some of it had a bit too much violence really. I don’t know, some of
the stories were a bit, had a bit too much violence.
I have to change my accent at school. And try and do standard English, ‘cos my English
is not standard enough. I’ve been told in a nice way, ‘Change that word and this word’,
because there’s a whole system in the school about which words we can use and which
we can’t use. They’re very specific. So I do switch [my accent] a little, I do.
It was not just a matter of a standard accent, however, for although she had
achieved a high score in the international IELTS1 exam and exceeded the require-
ments for postgraduate study internationally, Amal had struggled the previous year to
pass the compulsory online English literacy test of spelling, grammar, pronunciation
and reading comprehension; she sat it many times before being successful. Further-
more, she had had to learn all the terminology of mathematics and science, creating
vocabulary lists in a feat of memorisation for which her schooldays would, ironically,
have well prepared her.
150 K. Gallagher
As well as the linguistic challenges she faced, Amal was also feeling insecure due
to the expectations of parents in the private school:
[Overseas], I had parents coming in to work with me and they were really cool. Now that
I’m back in the UAE, I’m feeling all these other pressures that weren’t there. I was
accepted [there], but here I’m being questioned. It’s because of all the pressure of being
in a private school.
Despite these obstacles, and although she works much longer hours in the private
school than she did in the state school sector, she says that she enjoys the challenge.
She feels she has more energy and is more productive than before because of what she
finds to be a more professional working environment, and she says she is especially
happy with the whole-school approach to issues, the team work, and the level of
consultation in the school.
12. Discussion
12.1 Local capacity building
In his investigation into the teaching of English in primary schools in Asia, Nunan
(2003) concluded that the money spent by governments on hiring Anglophone teachers
from abroad would be better invested in the development of the proficiency and profes-
sionalism of local teachers. Indeed, the Arab knowledge renaissance called for in the
United Nations Arab human development report 2003: building a knowledge society
(2003) requires qualified teachers with contemporary teaching skills and knowledge,
and the up-skilling of unqualified and under-qualified extant teachers had represented
a crucial component in the plan for reformation of the school system. Recent develop-
ments, however, suggest that the staffing policy for state schools in the UAE has now
shifted towards the importation of new teachers from overseas. Although she is
concerned about the cultural mismatch of ‘foreign’ teachers coming into the state
school system, Amal is also concerned that the extant teachers from the region ‘don’t
see the gap’, as she puts it: ‘They have no experience of other teaching systems, so
they fail to see the problems.’ She herself, because of ‘doing all these shifts’, as she
describes the metamorphoses she has undergone, now understands the gaps ‘which is
the reason I went [abroad] in the first place, so those gaps are filling in’.
Having studied and experienced teaching and learning in the UAE as well as inter-
nationally, Amal has been unsettled from her prior understanding, and such unsettling
of beliefs is the nexus of teacher education. The challenges that Amal is facing in
‘doing all these shifts’ reifies a global paradigm shift in teacher education, a shift from
a traditional notion of teacher education as institution-bound reproduced learning, to
teacher education which is based on individualised learning in a context that is simul-
taneously localised and globalised (Cheng, Chow, and Mok 2004). The UAE state
school sector needs to seek out and invest in its ‘amals’, its young hopefuls, in order
to build a strong cadre of locally grounded and internationally exposed educators who
do ‘see the gap’, and who, like Amal, are reflective teachers who engage in lifelong
learning to maximise their potential (Zeichner and Liston 1996). They need to be
encouraged to take up in-country postgraduate study for capacity building through
linkages with international university partners; they must be enabled to undertake
English language immersion and school observation trips abroad; they should be
provided with compatriot mentors; and they need a viable career structure in order to
keep them within the education system.
Teacher Development 151
including substantial linguistic and cultural capital (Bourdieu 1991), she struggles
against an assigned identity in the private school. She recounts wryly the manner in
which she is introduced to people there, after four years of hard-won experience as a
teacher in the state sector, followed by her year abroad: ‘This is Amal. She has no
experience.’
The cultures of the state and elite private schools in the UAE are divergent, as in
most countries. Perhaps from the private school’s perspective, they don’t quite know
where to ‘place’ her; perhaps they wonder if she has the background to teach multiple
subjects through the medium of English. Perhaps they too are concerned about paren-
tal expectations regarding the identity of a teacher in such a school, as Amal herself
suggests. Nevertheless, in employing her, the school sends a clear message that
teacher identities, just like student identities, are ‘fluid, hybrid, multiple and dynamic’
(Lin 2008, 215), a powerful message for all stakeholders in schools at a time of
profound change.
13. Conclusion
Amal’s story is an instance of the universal truth that ‘teachers are always in a state
of becoming’ (Saha and Dworkin 2009, 6, emphasis in original), or as Clandinin puts
it, ‘are always in the making’ (2010, 282), and most intensely so in a climate of educa-
tional reform, as this narrative has shown. If it is indeed the case, as Fullan (2001, 115)
believes, that ‘educational change depends on what teachers do and think’, then
sustainable and successful reform depends on understanding what teachers are doing
and thinking as they become and re-become teachers.
Amal’s crossing of multiple borders and her efforts to master multiple discourses
in her academic and professional development have been charted in this paper, and
Gee (1990/1996, 167) argues that people who are trying to master conflicting or
contesting discourses are the ‘ultimate sources of change’. So too does Allsup (2006,
9) frame teacher identity formation as a borderland discourse, ‘the place of becoming,
the space of ambiguity and reflection’; an intermediate space wherein new terrains are
tentatively mapped and re-mapped, and where new teacher identities begin to emerge.
Looking to the future, Amal sees the possibility of a new role for herself in the revised
state education system as a bridge between old and new territories and discourses,
between the old and the new way of doing schooling in the UAE: ‘I would like to
bridge the gap between two different teaching cultures,’ she declares.
Teacher Development 153
Note
1. IELTS is the International English Language Test, a skills-based test of English proficiency
that includes a speaking test as well as tests of reading, writing and listening. Amal’s score
of Band 7.5 rates her between a ‘good’ and a ‘very good’ user on a scale that ranges from
1–9, and thus exceeds the requirements for postgraduate-level study through the medium
of English anywhere in the world.
Notes on contributor
Kay Gallagher teaches in the Faculty of Education at the University of Hong Kong. She has
been a leader in English language teaching and teacher education in the UAE for many years,
and prior to that was head teacher of an innovative multicultural school in Ireland. Her interests
centre on the learning and teaching of English in schools, on learning and teaching in language
teacher education, and on educational change.
References
Abu Dhabi Education Council. 2010. ADEC prepares education community for monumental
step in education reform. http://www.adec.ac.ae/en/news/adec-prepares-school-community-
for-monumental-step-in-education-reform.html.
Al Banna, H. 1997. Teacher training in the UAE: Problems and prospects. In Higher educa-
tion in the Gulf: Retrospect and prospect, ed. K. Shaw, 100–18. Exeter, UK: University of
Exeter Press.
Allsup, J. 2006. Teacher identity discourses. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Al Sharhan, A. 2007. Language in education in the United Arab Emirates. Beirut: Librairie du
Liban.
Alwan, F. 2007. Teacher voice in teacher evaluation: Teaching portfolios in the United Arab
Emirates. In Evaluating teacher effectiveness in ESL/EFL contexts, ed. C. Coombe, M. Al
Hamly, P. Davidson, and S. Troudi, 232–44. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bashur, M. 2010. Observations from the edge of the deluge. In Trajectories of education in
the Arab world, ed. O. Abi-Mershed, 247–72. Oxford: Routledge.
Bates, R. 2007. Regulation and autonomy in teacher education: System or democracy? In Hand-
book of teacher education: Globalization, standards and professionalism, ed. T. Townsend
and R. Bates, 127–40. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Bathmaker, A., and P. Harnett, eds. 2010. Exploring learning, identity and power through life
history and narrative research. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Bell, J. 2002. Narrative inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly 36, no. 2:
207–13.
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Braine, G., ed. 1999. Non-native educators in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bristol-Rhys, J. 2008. Gender-separated higher education in the UAE. In Higher education in
the Gulf States: Shaping economies, politics and culture, ed. C. Davidson and P.M. Smith,
98–109. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
Britzman, D. 1991. Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany:
State University of New York Press.
Buzzelli, C., and B. Johnston. 2002. The moral dimensions of teaching: Language, power,
and culture in classroom interaction. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Canagarajah, S. 1999. Interrogating the native speaker fallacy. In Non-native educators in
English language teaching, ed. G. Braine, 77–92. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cheng, Y., K. Chow, and M. Mok. 2004. Reform of teacher education amid paradigm shift in
school education In Reform of teacher education in the Asia-Pacific in the new millen-
nium, ed. Y. Cheng, K. Chow, and M. Mok, 3–22. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Clandinin, D., and M. Connelly. 2000. Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative
research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Clandinin, J. 2010. Editorial: Sustaining teachers in teaching. Teachers and Teaching 16,
no. 3: 281–3.
154 K. Gallagher
Clarke, M. 2006. Beyond antagonism? The discursive construction of ‘new’ teachers in the
United Arab Emirates. Teaching Education 17, no. 3: 225–37.
Clarke, M. 2008. Language teacher identities: Co-constructing discourse and community.
Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Connelly, F., and D. Clandinin. 1990. Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational
Researcher 19, no. 5: 2–14.
Davidson, C. 2005. The United Arab Emirates: A study in survival. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner
Press.
Davidson, C. 2008. Dubai: The vulnerability of success. New York: Columbia University Press.
Davidson, C. 2009. Abu Dhabi: Oil and beyond. New York/London: Columbia University
Press/Hurst & Co.
Day, C. 1999. Developing teachers: The challenge of lifelong learning. Florence, KY: Taylor
and Francis.
Earnest, J., and D. Treagust, eds. 2006. Educational reform in societies in transition:
International perspectives. Rotterdam: Sense.
Ferguson, C. 1959/2003. Diglossia. In Sociolinguistics: The essential readings, ed. B. Paulston
and G. Tucker, 345–58. Oxford: Blackwell.
Findlow, S. 2000. The UAE: Nationalism and Arab-Islamic identity (vol. 39). Abu Dhabi,
UAE: Emirates Centre for Strategic Studies and Research.
Findlow, S. 2005. International networking in the United Arab Emirates higher education
system: Global-local tensions. Compare 35, no. 3: 285–302.
Findlow, S. 2006. Higher education and linguistic dualism in the Arab Gulf. British Journal of
Sociology of Education 27, no. 1: 19–36.
Fox, W. 2008. The United Arab Emirates and policy priorities for higher education. In Higher
education in the Gulf States: Shaping economies, politics and culture, ed. C. Davidson
and P. Smith, 110–25. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
Fullan, M. 1993. Change forces: Probing the depth of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
Fullan, M. 2001. The new meaning of educational change. 3rd ed. New York: Teachers
College Press.
Fullan, M., and A. Hargreaves. 1992. Teacher development and educational change. In
Teacher development and educational change, ed. M. Fullan and A. Hargreaves, 1–9.
London: Falmer Press.
Furlong, J., O. McNamara, A. Campbell, J. Howson, and S. Lewis. 2008. Partnership, policy
and politics: Initial teacher education in England under New Labour. Teachers and Teaching
14, no. 4: 307–18.
Gee, J.P. 1990/1996. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York:
RoutledgeFalmer.
Gee, J.P. 2000. Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in
Education 25, no. 1: 99–125.
Halpin, D. 2003. Hope and education: The role of the utopian imagination. London:
RoutledgeFalmer.
Hargreaves, A. 2000. Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and
Teaching: History and Practice 6, no. 2: 151–82.
Hayes, D. 2010. Duty and service: Life and career of a Tamil teacher of English in Sri Lanka.
TESOL Quarterly 44, no. 1: 58–83.
Heard-Bey, F. 2005. The United Arab Emirates: Statehood and nation-building in a traditional
society. The Middle East Journal 59, no. 3: 357–75.
Holliday, A. 2005. The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Johnson, K. 2006. The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher
education. TESOL Quarterly 40, no. 1: 235–57.
Johnson, K. 2009. Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Oxford:
Routledge.
Johnson, K., and P. Golombek, eds. 2002. Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional devel-
opment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, B., F. Pawan, and R. Mahan-Taylor. 2005. The professional development of working
ESL/EFL teachers: A pilot study. In Second language teacher education, ed. D. Tedick,
53–72. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Teacher Development 155