Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
" "The Controversy of Zion" is timeless. Zionism, World Revolution and World Government are only
immesurably more advanced
today than in 1956. Links give current state of the subjects. Including: Judaism-Antisemitism-
Jesus-Christianity-Communism-Subversion-Terrorism-Tyranny-Conspiracy-The West-World
Government .
Primary links:
• Douglas Reed Books
• Jew Watch
• David Duke
• Ziopedia
• National Journal
• Jeff Rense
• Three World Wars
• American Free Press
• The Barnes Review
• Institute for Historical Review
• Conspiracy World
• Zundelsite
• 'The Dodo' by Knud Eriksen
• 'Mosaic Upps' by Knud Eriksen
• Balder.Org
• Patriot.dk
• Anti-Defamation League
• Pravda.ru
• Reformed Church of Israel
• Jinfo.org
• 2oth Century History Book
• Henry Makov, Ph.d
Secondary Links:.
• The Passion of the Christ
• Matthews Henrys Commentaries
• T. Austin Sparks
• Prophetic Perspectives
• Great Controversy
• Hebraic Roots of Christianity
• Bridges for Peace
• Christians for Israel
• Kumah
• Judaism
• Eichlers
Home
Links
More
Ziopedia Disinformation?
It has come to my attention that Ziopedia’s editor has sent out a link to an article arguing that
Ron Paul is a CIA asset who serves as controlled opposition. Reading over the linked article
there is only one substantive argument:
“He only voted no, when it had no effect on the passing of the bill. He even voted in
favour of the critical hate bill...”
No bill number is given.
I found the only plausible bill to be HR 1592, for which the roll call was:
Yeas 237
Nays 180
Not Voting 16 (including Ron Paul)
Ron Paul did miss that vote, but it had no effect on the outcome whatsoever since the Yeas beat
the Nays by an amount greater than the number Not Voting.
Moreover, it is rather strange to expect that Ron Paul, the “CIA Spook”, would deliberately
avoid a vote of “No” when not only would his vote would have no impact on the outcome but
when he came out with the following public statement about the bill:
Unconstitutional Legislation Threatens Freedoms
May 7, 2007
Last week, the House of Representatives acted with disdain for the Constitution and
individual liberty by passing HR 1592, a bill creating new federal programs to combat so-
called “hate crimes.” The legislation defines a hate crime as an act of violence committed
against an individual because of the victim’s race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual
orientation, gender identity, or disability. Federal hate crime laws violate the Tenth
Amendment’s limitations on federal power. Hate crime laws may also violate the First
Amendment guaranteed freedom of speech and religion by criminalizing speech federal
bureaucrats define as “hateful.”…
Posted by James Bowery on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 at 04:55 AM in
Comments (8) | Tell a friend
Comments: