/lit/ Philosophy Project 1.2 https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0Xe...

Continental Philosophy:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fBYpm4MHyKM-80sTzQaBiYLI0vJKkE80h2b10JR5cwg/edit

Analytic Philosophy:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YrXfvjz4NCyLlob9bo_N9fpoYB-saCTbLoGP5TctJTs/edit

Moved to their own google docs for file size reasons

Marxist non-philosophers will go under the Marxism section but Marxist philosophers (like Zizek) will go to their respective
Continental/Analytic place.
I have placed Phil. of Science right under Analytic Philosophy as Phil. of Science is almost completely dominated by the Analytic tradition,
BUT there are some exceptions such as Canguilhem and Bachelard.

The concept of the political.

Then Theory of the Constitution.
Then Political Theology.

Publikacja: Dysk Google – Zgłoś nadużycie – Automatyczne aktualizacje co 5 min

68 z 68 23.11.2018, 18:34
/lit/ Philosophy Project 1.2 https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0Xe...

The Elementary Forms of Religious Life ISBN: 0029079373

Don’t get the Oxford translation of this seminal work, it’s actually abridged!

Quick Metaphilosophy
There is a lot of bantz when one claims that the Continental/Analytic distinction is/is not nominalist or merely
sociological/geopolitical and there is/is not any methodological distinction between “Analytic” and “Continental” Philosophy. For
example some “Analytic” philosophers claim there is no “Continental Philosophy” because the parts of what comprise said
Philosophy (Phenomenology, Existentialism, Structuralism etc) are “quite distinct” one cannot lump them all under the name
“Continental Philosophy”. Meta-philosophical books from both the Continental and Analytic sides are below. Divide Is real.

0192853597
0521694264
0674644735
0631214143
0748624716
0773538089
Don’t be fooled by the title of the book by Simon Critchley, It really is not a introduction but a sneaky Meta-philosophical book
(but it also explains the history of Continental Philosophy starting from Kant). Also mind Pippin’s book as it is undecipherable
(Hegelian, jokes!) .

https://philosophynow.org/issues/74/Analytic_versus_Continental_Philosophy
www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiISBhwxaY0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=us3Ke1tF9dU

Marxism:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g6XaOX8RldHRg_JradONkS99oE6uC5dc9EuyOa5rips/edit?usp=sharing

67 z 68 23.11.2018, 18:34