Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
c assist software firms to determine the type of market
analysis that is needed for decision-making. Two general strategies that are well known in the
marketing discipline are:
"Marketing mix" is the typical strategy for traditional mass marketers of product software in
competitive markets. Structured market research, and agility in reacting to sales, are
characteristic of their product development process (J
, 2000). An example
would be
J, with their various home computer software games, which are
advertised on television and sold in many electronic stores.
Broethers and van't Kruis explain two other strategies that are important to the growth of
software firms:
Besides helping with current strategies, market analysis can improve future planning and growth
strategies that are helpful in product roadmapping decisions. It also helps discover areas where
"complementary product development" and "diversification strategies" can be profitable.
Complementary goods can be in the form of other software products, hardware, or services, such
as consultancy, user training, and customization (ë
, 1994). The development of these
goods increases the opportunities for companies in the software market (, 1998). Even
complementary products from other vendors can lead to an increase in the value of the original
product, while reducing the time to market (
, 2004).
The complementary product strategy adds value by showing innovation, and creates a multiplier
effect on the original product (, 1998). Investing in other products and services aids in
diversification, which can increase the overall customer base, and helps decrease the risks of
being overly specialized (ë
, 1994). Diversification can, therefore, increase the
financial health of the company. An example of this is Microsoft, which has increased the sales
of its primary operating system software by offering products, such as word processing, and
media player software.
D
O? Alajoutsijarvi, Kimmo, Kari Mannermaa, and Henrikki Tikkanen.
J
,
Information & Management, Volume: 37, Issue: 3 (April 1, 2000), pp:153±159.
!
, Volume: 30, Issue: 4 (August 1997), pp:
475±476 & 518±528.
, Industrial Marketing Management, Volume: 23, Issue: 1 (February 1994), pp:
29±37.
O? Sengupta, S.
$
J
, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Volume: 15, Issue: 4 (July
1998), pp: 352±367.