Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
: UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP-01
Issue Version : 2.0
Date :
FOR
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. PURPOSE 2
3. SCOPE OF WORK 2
4. RESPONSIBILITIES 2
4.1 FYP Committee
4.2 Supervisor
4.3 Co-supervisor
4.4 Panel of examiners
4.5 Students
6. WRITING FORMAT 13
6.1 Preliminary Report/Progress Report/Interim Report/
Dissertation Outline
6.2 General Writing Format
6.3 General Content
7. SEMINAR 20
8. EVALUATION 20
9. GRADING SCHEME 22
10. CLAIMS 22
12. PLAGIARISM 23
13. COPYRIGHT 23
ii
14. APPENDICES 24
APPENDIX 2-1: Suggested Milestone for the First Semester of 2 Semester FYP
APPENDIX 2-2: Suggested Milestone for the Second Semes ter of 2 Semester FYP
APPENDIX 2-3: Suggested Milestone for the One Semester Final Year Project
iii
1. INTRODUCTION
All final year students in UTP are required to undertake a final year project (FYP)
paper, which is a design and/or research-based subject. This course is a compulsory
element in all programmes offered in UTP except for chemical engineering students
where this course becomes elective for students with CGPA higher than 3.0. T he
credit hours and the semesters in which it is offered vary according to programmes as
in Table 1 below.
solutions. It is an opportunity for students to use the tools and techniques of problem-
solving to s olve the problems they have encountered. With this approach, the learning
students with skills required for managing a project are also incorporated. Thus, the
which will enable them to participate and prepare for future employment.
Working under the guidance of supervisor(s), students may shape the direction of
what they want to be in the near future, as well as gain better understanding of the
responsibilities they have to shoulder when they undertake a project. Teamwork spirit
will be inculcated with the development of good and professional relationship with
1
their supervisor(s) and colleagues. The undertaken project can also be used as a basis
for job employment by fully exploiting the learning process they have gone through,
the skills they have gathered and the experience they have gained from undertaking
the project.
This guideline is prepared for students and supervisors to enable them to execute
both parties. With that, the success of implementation of this course can then be
realised.
2. PURPOSE
The purpose of the project is to develop a framework, which will enhance students'
3. SCOPE OF WORK
modelling, simulations, analysis and product design. The area and scope of the project
should be narrowed down so that the project is feasible and could be completed within
the allocated time frame. The project work must exhibit element of originality, which
indicates the maturity level for the final year bachelor degree programme.
4. RESPONSIBILITIES
of examiners and Students is formed to manage the final year project paper. They
should work closely with each other as shown in Appendix 1-1. It is the
2
delivered within the project time frame. The team responsibilities are indicated as in
The Chairman of the FYP Committee for each Programme is the respective
4.1.1 The main tasks and responsibilities of the Coordinator are as follows:
project.
supervisor(s).
3
k) To brief the students and supervisors on the project
examiners.
Appendix 3-3.
semester.
students.
s) To compile and retain Form 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09,
10, 11, 12 and 13 for at least one year after graduation for
auditing purposes.
committee’s recommendations.
4
b) To ensure the initial project proposal is relevant to student’s
field of study.
4.2 Supervisor
follows:
(a) To work together with students until the submission of the final report.
(b) To assist students on the accessibility of the tools needed in the project.
(c) To monitor the schedule and progress of the students and their projects.
(d) To assist and guide students on the project and the preparation of
Table 3 in Section 8.
5
and other related resources for the project. Please refer to Form 03 in
Appendix 3-3.
(j) To compile and retain all evaluation for at least one year after
4.3 Co-Supervisor
very specialized areas. The Co-Super visor can be internal or external (from
solving specific task within his expertise as and when necessary within the
The FYP Committee appoints the Panel of Examiners. The Examiners will
will be one from industry and one lecturer from other programmes. If it is not
4.5 Students
6
analyses. Students should take their own initiative such as proposing a title for
their project on their own. They are also required to work independently
while undertaking the project. If working in a group, the students are expected
of the project.
(a) To select a project topic on their own or the one suggested by the
Supervisor.
(d) To adhere to the meeting schedule with the Supervisor for the purpose
endorsed by Supervisor.
7
(a) Lecturers will submit project proposals according to their interests and
(b) Students are also encouraged to propose their own project proposals based
(c) All proposals must be submitted to FYP Coordin ator for each department
a) The Coordinator will forward the list to the FYP committee for
approval.
c) The proposer will be called by the FYP Committee, if any cla rification
is required.
students.
a) Students who did not submit a project proposal or their proposal have
maximum of three (3) titles from the given list in any order of
Appendix 3-2.
b) The Coordinator will forward the students’ selections list to the FYP
8
5.4 Allocation of Approved Project Title
Form 04.
b) Supervisor will evaluate the report and submit the marks to the
9
b) Identify problem statement, objective and scope of the study
Supervisor.
b) Supervisor will evaluate the Progress Report and submit the marks to
5/Appendix 3 -8.
the contents of the project and its significance, like the problem statement,
and recommendations.
approve.
b) Students will submit three (3) copies of final draft of their dissertation
to the Coordinator who will distribute them to the Examiners. For two
10
5.9 Submission of Hard-Bound Copy of Project Dissertation
i. Supervisor
ii. Department
iii. Library
5.10 Seminar
In this seminar students should be able to verbally report the progress of their
project with the supervisor, fellow students and other lecturers attending the
seminar. The seminar is also an avenue for the student to get feedback on how
groups.
a) Explain verbally to the audience about their project, through the poster
effectively.
departmental level.
11
b) The evaluation of the poster is using Form 13 in Appendix 3 -13.
b) demonstrate how well they are able to explain and understand the
b) The Examiners will give comments on the final draft / interim report
§ Problem Statement
§ Literature Review
§ Procedure/Methodology
12
e) The Panel of Examiners comprises the supervisor, an external
f) For FYP I, the FYP Committee may not necessarily invite the external
examiner to evaluate the oral presentation and the interim report in the
first semester.
a) The Coordinator will compile all the marks and obtain endorsement
b) The Coordinator will submit the endor sed result to the Exam Unit or
6. WRITING FORMAT
The writing of the preliminary report (initial report), progress report, interim report
a) Title Page
c) Abstract
e) Table of Contents
f) List of Figures
g) List of Tables
- Background
- Problem Statement
n) References
o) Appendices
Students must follow specific guidelines for writing all the reports as indicated
in Section 6 .
a) Language
All text should be 1.5 spacing between lines and 3 spacing between
c) Length
14
Preliminary Report - 5 pages
Progress Report - 15 pages
Interim Report - 25 pages
Dissertation - 50 pages
d) Pagination
e) Margin
The top, bottom and right margins are 25 mm except the left margin,
f) Mathematical Equations
g) Heading
The report should not have more than three levels of numbered
headings as follows:
1 FIRST-LEVEL HEAD
15
All headings should be in Times New Roman and bold. Chapter and
case and in 12 font size. If there are more than three levels of headings,
Tables and figures are considered part of the report if it is within the
main text. If they have the size that less than a page, they should be
inserted into the text near the point of reference with a 3 spacing from
the text. Tables should be on the same page. Margin limits of figures
and tables should be the same as the full-page text. All tables and
positioned at the top middle of each table. The numbers for figure
table or figure clearly in the text before placing it on the page. (For
i) Documenting Sources
Students are required to cite the sources from which ideas they are
j) References
The method of writing references must follow the standard format. The
APA system.
k) Title Page
16
attached specimen sheet in Appendix 6-1 and should include the
following:
Students must submit three (3) hard cover copies of their dissertation to the
Coordinator. The Academic Office will keep one copy and the other one will
be kept in the Library. The hard cover colour for each programme is listed in
Table 2. Please refer to Appendix 6 -2 for the writing format for the front hard
cover.
Programme Colour
This section will elaborate more about the general content needed in each part
a) Title Page
The title of the report should reflect the focus on core issues of the
b) Certification
c) Abstract
d) Acknowledgements
project work including the supervisors and the members of the group,
e) Table of Contents
f) Introduction
clarify the boundary project work to ensure the feasibility within the
18
others have said and/or discovered about the question. It contains all
relevant theories, hypotheses, facts and data which are relevant to the
h) Methodology/Project Work
This section presents the finding or outcome of project work. All the
gathered data from the project work must be presented in the form of
tables and figures such as graph, diagram or others. The data need to be
k) References
This section is the list of refere nces used in the project. The method of
writing references must follow the standard format. Please refer to the
l) Appendices
Sample”.
19
7. SEMINAR
The purpose of this seminar is to report the progress of the project that the student is
working on and get the feedback from the supervisor to improve their work. In this
audience
evaluation will be based on the form 04 (Appendix 3-4) and form 05 (Appendix 3-
8. EVALUATION
Students are evaluated based on their capability in undertaking the project, producing
the written report and presenting the result. Overall commitment, as well as personal
conduct, is also to be observed at all time. The main components of evaluation and the
grading structure are given in Table 3.1, Table 3.2 and Table 3.3 .
20
Table 3.1: Grading Structure for ONE Semester Programme for Chemical
Engineering only.
21
9. GRADING SCHEME
Students will be graded according to the UTP grading scheme as in Table 4.
85 – 100 A 4.0
80 – 84.9 A- 3.75
75 – 79.9 B+ 3.5
65 -74.9 B 3.0
55 – 64.9 C+ 2.5
50 – 54.9 C 2.0
45 – 49.9 D+ 1.5
40 – 44.9 D 1.0
0 - 39.9 F 0.0
10. CLAIMS
Students are entitled to final year project claims of RM 250 per semester for the
following items.
b) Testing/technical support
d) Travel/visit for data requisition (with the most economical mode of travel)
e) Procurement of data
f) Exhibition posters
All claims shall be submitted using Form 03 to the Supervisor, required support from
the Coordinator and to be endorsed by FYP Chairman.
22
i) Students shall be barred from the project on week 9 if TWO (2) consecutive
grade of F.
ii) Students will also be barred if they do not officially select the topic (fail to
Students shall be barred from the presentation if they do not participate in both the
seminar and exposition. As a consequence, students will earn a grade of F and will
12. PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism is the act of obtaining or attempting to obtain credit for academic work by
representing the work of another as one's own without the necessary and appropriate
acknowledgment. More specifically, plagiarism is:
Source: www.sonoma.edu/uaffairs/policies/cheatingpolicy.htm
If a student is in doubt about the nature of plagiarism, he/she should discuss the
matter with the supervisor. If a student is caught committing plagiarism, stern action
will be taken against the student.
13. COPYRIGHT
The university shall be the owner for all findings, designs, patents, and other
23
CHAIRMAN
(HEAD OF DEPARTMENT)
COORDINATOR &
COMMITTEE
SUPERVISOR(S)
EXAMINER(S)
CO-SUPERVISOR(S)
EXTERNAL
INTERNAL EXAMINER SUPERVISOR EXAMINER (FYP
(WITHIN DEPARTMENT ) II only)
STUDENTS
APPENDIX 1-1
Organisation chart on the management of the Final Year Project
24
APPENDIX1-2
FINAL YEAR PROJECT FLOW PROCESS
Process Responsibility / Document
Action
START
NOT
ACCEPTEP
5.2 Approval List of
on Project Coordinator, Approved
Proposal & FYP Titles &
Supervisor Supervisors
25
APPENDIX1-2
FINAL YEAR PROJECT FLOW PROCESS
Process Responsibility / Document
Action
Supervisor,
Assessment Coordinator Form 05/
Form 08
11.0 Barring
of Student
NOT MEET
REQUIREMENT
Grade F MEET
REQUIREMENT
Students,
5.10 Seminar Coordinator, Form 05/
Examiner Form 08
Assessment Supervisor,
Coordinator, Form 06/
Examiner Form 09
26
APPENDIX1-2
FINAL YEAR PROJECT FLOW PROCESS
11.0 Barring
from Presentation
NOT MEET
REQUIREMENT MEET
REQUIREMENT
Grade F
Students,
5.12 Oral Supervisor, Form 07/
Presentation Examiners, FYP Form 10
committee
Amendment on Students,
Interim/
the Final Draft as Supervisor,
Dissertation
Advised Examiners Final Draft
END
27
Suggested Milestone for the First Semester of 2 -Semester Final Year Project
Mid-semester break
4 Seminar 1 (optional)
5 Project Work
7 Seminar 2 (compulsory)
10 Oral Presentation
Suggested milestone
APPENDIX 2-1
Process
28
Suggested Milestone for the Second Semester of 2-Semester Final Year Project
Mid-Semester Break
4 Submission of Progress Report 2
5 Seminar (compulsory)
6 Poster Exhibition
8 Oral Presentation
Suggested milestone
Process
APPENDIX 2-2
29
Suggested Milestone for One Semester Final Year Project (for Chemical Engineering only)
Mid-Semester Break
4 Project Work
6 Seminar
8 Oral Presentation
APPENDIX 2-3
Suggested milestone
Process
30
APPENDIX 3-1
FORM 01
Project Title:
Objectives:
Tools/equipment required:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
31
APPENDIX 3-2
FORM 02
TOPIC SELECTION
COMMITTEE DECISION
Topic approved:_____________________________________________
Approved by Coordinator
(only for Supervisor-allocated titles)
Signature:
Official stamp:
Date:
32
APPENDIX 3-3
FORM 03
(Note: Supervisor can use this form to request (a )purchasing consumables and equipment , (b) testing /
technical support, (c) consultations fees and other related resources to the project, (d) visit for data
collection.)
REQUESTED BY
Supervisor’s Name
Project Title
Supervisor’s Signature
Student’s Name
Date
* Please attach this form with original receipt or any proof of purchase.
33
APPENDIX 3-4
Very Bad
Awarded)
Marginal
Very Good
Average
– Failure
Below
Average
Average
Excellent
Poor-
Very
Category Judging Quality
Pass
(Mark
Above
Good
*
Poor
Just
*
Comments:
.…………………………
Supervisor’s /Examiner’s signature
34
APPENDIX 3-5
Very Bad
Awarded)
Marginal
Very Good
Average
– Failure
Below
Average
Average
Poor-
Pass
Category
Very
Excellent
Judging Quality
(Mark
Above
Good
*
Poor
*
Just
• Clear and concise Background
Project of Study
Background • Problem Statement
(20) - Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Objective and Scope of (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
Study
• The Relevancy of the
Project
• Feasibility of the Project
• within the Scope and Time
No. of references
Literature • Critical analysis of literature A A- D+ F
Review (30) • Citation and cross referencing (30) (25)
B+ B C+ C (15)
D
(6)
• Relevancy and recentness of (24) (22.5) (19.5) (16.5) (13.5)
the literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology • Project activities
(10) • Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Tool (eg. Equipment,
hardware, etc.) required.
Result and • Data Gathering and Analysis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Discussion (10) • Experimentation/Modelling (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
.…………………………
Supervisor's signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
35
APPENDIX 3-6
FORM 06
(Marks Awarded)
Please circle the appropriate grade for each category
– Marginal
Very Bad -
Very, Very
Criteria for
Very Good
Very Poor
Excellent
Average
Average
Category
Failure
Above
Judging Quality
Good
Good
Pass
Poor
Just
• Objective (s)
• Problem statement A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Abstract (10) • Scope of Study (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Methodology
• Findings
• Background of Study
• Problem Statement
- Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Introduction (20)
• Objective and Scope of Study (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within
the Scope and Time frame
• No. of references
Literature Review • Critical analysis of literature A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
and/or Theory (20) • Citation and cross referencing (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• Relevancy and recentness of the
literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology (20) • Project activities
• Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• Tools (eg. Equipment, hardware,
etc.) required.
Result and • Findings
Discussion (10) • Data Gathering/ Data Analysis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Experimentation/Modelling/ (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
Prototype/Project Deliverables
Conclusions and • Relevancy to the Objectives
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Recommendations • Suggested Future Work for
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
(10) Expansion and Continuation
• Compliance to standard guideline
• Format
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Others (10) • Neatness (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Proper English Usage
• Writing Skill
TOTAL SCORE /100
OVERALL GRADE (refer to UTP Grading Scheme below)
Comments:
.…………………………
Supervisor/ Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
36
APPENDIX 3-7
FORM 07
(Marks Awarded)
Please circle the appropriate grade for each category
Very Poor –
Very Good
Criteria for
Very Bad -
Very, Very
Excellent
Marginal
Average
Average
Category
Failure
Above
Good
Good
Judging Quality
Poor
Pass
Just
• Background of Study
• Problem Statement
- Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Introduction (10) • Objective and Scope of Study (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within the
Scope and Time frame
• No. of references
Literature Review • Critical analysis of literature A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Citation and cross referencing (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
and/or Theory (20) • Relevancy and recentness of the
literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology (10) • Project activities
• Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Tools (eg. Equipment, hardware, etc.)
required.
Result and • Findings
Discussion (10) • Data Gathering/ Data Analysis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Experimentation/Modelling/ (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
Prototype/Project Deliverables
Conclusions and • Relevancy to the Objectives
• Suggested Future Work for Expansion A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Recommendations (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
and Continuation
(10)
• Fluency and choice of words (using
Clarity of language clearly and accurately)
C D+ D F
presentation (10) Pronunciation, articulation A A- B+ B C+
(5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Use of aids (graphs, diagrams, objects (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)
etc)
• Continuity of Presentation
Non-verbal • Appearance; Facial expression; C D+ D F
Confidence A A- B+ B C+
Communication (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5)
(5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
(10) • Gesture; Eye Contact, Pauses
Comments:
.…………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ______________
37
APPENDIX 3-8
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP -01.08 2.0 Xx xx
FORM 08
Very Bad
Awarded)
Marginal
Very Good
Average
– Failure
Below
Average
Average
Excellent
Poor-
Very
Pass
Category Judging Quality
(Mark
Above
Good
*
Poor
Just
*
• Clear and concise Background of
Project Study
Background • Problem Statement
(10) - Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Objective and Scope of Study (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within
the Scope and Time frame
• No. of references
Literature • Critical analysis of literature A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Review (10) • Citation and cross referencing (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Relevancy and recentness of the
literature
• Research Methodology
• Project activities
Methodology • Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
(10) • Gantt Chart (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Tool (eg. Equipment, hardware,
etc.) required.
• Data Gathering and Analysis
Result and A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Discussion (30) • Experimentation/Modelling (30) (25) (24) (22.5) (19.5 ) (16.5) (15) (13.5) (6)
• Prototype
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Conclusion (20) • Relevancy to the Objectives (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
.…………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ______________
38
APPENDIX 3-9
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP -01.08 2.0 Xx xx
FORM 09
(Marks Awarded)
Please circle the appropriate grade for each category
– Marginal
Very Bad -
Very, Very
Criteria for
Very Good
Very Poor
Excellent
Average
Average
Category
Failure
Above
Judging Quality
Good
Good
Pass
Poor
Just
• Objective(s)
• Problem statement A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Abstract (10) • Scope of Study (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Methodology
• Findings
• Background of Study
• Problem Statement
- Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Introduction (20)
• Objective and Scope of Study (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within
the Scope and Time frame
• No. of references
Literature Review • Critical analysis of literature A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
and/or Theory (10) • Citation and cross referencing (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Relevancy and recentness of the
literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology (10) • Project activities
• Key milestone A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Gantt Chart (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Tools (eg. Equipment, hardware,
etc.) required.
Result and • Findings
Discussion (30) • Data Gathering/ Data Analysis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Experimentation/Modelling/ (30) (25)
(24) (22.5) (19.5) (16.5)
(15)
(13.5)
(6)
Prototype/Project Deliverables
Conclusions and • Relevancy to the Objectives
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Recommendations • Suggested Future Work for
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
(10) Expansion and Continuation
• Compliance to standard guideline
• Format
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Others (10) • Neatness (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Proper English Usage
• Writing Skill
TOTAL SCORE /100
OVERALL GRADE (refer to UTP Grading Scheme below)
Comments:
.…………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ______________
39
APPENDIX 3-10
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYP -01.08 2.0 Xx xx
FORM 10
Awarded)
(Marks
Criteria for
Excellent
Average
Average
Very Bad
Marginal
- Failure
Category
Poor –
Above
Good
Good
Good
Very,
Poor
Very
Very
Very
Pass
Judging Quality
Just
• Background of Study
• Problem Statement
- Problem Identification
- Significant of the Project A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Introduction (10)
• Objective and Scope of Study (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• The Relevancy of the Project
• Feasibility of the Project within the Scope
and Time frame
• No. of references
Literature Review • Critical analysis of literature A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
and/or Theory (10) • Citation and cross referencing (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Relevancy and recentness of the literature
• Research Methodology
Methodology (10) • Project activities
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Key milestone
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Gantt Chart
• Tools (eg. Equipment, hardware, etc.)
Result and Discussion • Findings
(20) • Data Gathering/ Data Analysis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Experimentation/Modelling/ (20) (17) (16) (15) (13) (11) (10) (9) (4)
Prototype/Project Deliverables
• Relevancy to the Objectives
Conclusions and • Suggested Future Work for Expansion and A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Recommendations ( 10) Continuation (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
Score Range
85 – 100 A
80 – 84.9 A-
75 – 79.9 B+
65 – 74.9 B
.…………………………
55 – 64.9 C+
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature 50 – 54.9 C
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
45 – 49.9 D+
40 – 44.9 D
0 – 39.9 F
40
APPENDIX 3-11
FORM 11
Name (optional):_________________________________________________
Programme :_________________________________________________
3. Coordination
41
APPENDIX 3-11
6. Logbook
Note : If the space pr ovided is not sufficient, please use extra sheets.
42
APPENDIX 3-12
FORM 12
Name : ______________________________________________________
Programme : ______________________________________________________
2. Students performance
5. Logbook
43
APPENDIX 3-12
6. Services, resources and facilities
8. Other recommendations
Note : If the space provided is not sufficient, please use extra sheets.
44
APPENDIX 3-13
Very Bad –
Criteria for
Very Poor -
Very Good
Marginal
Awarded)
Average
Judging Quality
Below
Excellent
Pass
Average
Average
Failure
(Mark
Good
Above
*
*
Poor
Just
1. Opening (10)
• Introduction
• Opening statement A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
(10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Confidence
2. Content (50)
• Suitability of topic
• Accuracy
• Introduction and background information
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Analytic content (50) (42.5) (40) (37.5) (32.5) (27.5) (25) (22.5) (10)
• Thoroughness
• Reader friendly layout (typography, color,
graphic images, etc.)
• Grammar, spelling and vocabulary
3. Conclusion (10) A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Choice and use of effective closing (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
techniques
4. Questions and Answers (10)
• Ability to anticipate and answer questions A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Ability to maintain good relationship with (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
questioners
• Knowledge of the subject
5. Delivery (20)
• Vocal clarity: volume, rate, articulation,
pronunciation
• Vocal quality: natural, conversational,
varied, emphasis A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
• Eye contact (10) (8.5) (8) (7.5) (6.5) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (2)
• Professionalism: appearance, confidence,
enthusiasm
• Organization: logical flow, time
management
TOTAL SCORE
/100
.…………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ______________
45
APPENDIX 4-1
SAMPLE OF PAGE SETUP
Top margin
1.0” 25mm
50 mm
1.5 spacing,
Times New
Roman,
capital, CHAPTER 1
bold and
14 font size
TITLE OF THE CHAPTER
Double spacing,
Times New
Roman,
1. MAJOR HEADING
1.0” 2
46
APPENDIX 5-1
SAMPLE OF DOCUMENTING SOURCES
The followings are the variations of APA Citations. For further reference, please refer
to the internet under Documenting Sources.
Gilster (1993) is very definite: “Simply put, the Internet is changing so rapidly, with
so many new databases, services, addresses, and projects, that it can’t be neatly
encapsulated in any one set of commands or maxims” (p.2).
What is entirely clear is that the Internet “can’t be neatly encapsulated in any one
set of commands or maxims” (Gilster, 1993, p.2).
3. The author has several works listed in the References. If they have different dates,
no special treatment is necessary; if an author has two works dated the same year,
differentiate them in the text and in the References with a lower-case letter after
each date (1993a,1993b).
Gilster (1993a) points out that the Internet “ can’t be encapsulated in any one set of
comma nds or maxims” (p.2).
4. Paraphrases are handled like quotations. Give the author’s last name, the date, and
the appropriate page numbers.
Gilster (1993) says that the Internet changes so fast that you must come to see your
experience with it as daily learning process.
47
APPENDIX 5-1
5. When citing block quotations, the period is placed before the page parentheses.
Do not place quotation marks before and after a block quotation. Indent the left
margin 5 spaces and double-space. Do not indent the right margin.
48
APPENDIX 5-2
SAMPLE OF REFERENCE FORMATS
Eskey, D and Grabe, W. 1988, "Interactive models for second language reading" in
P. Carrell, J. Devine and D. Eskey (Eds) Interactive approaches to Second
Language Reading , Cambridge; Cambridge University Press
Glister P. 1993, The Internet Navigator, New York, John Wiley & Sons
Meguid, S.A. and Zhu, Z.H., 1995, "A novel finite element for treating
inhomogeneous solids," International Journal Numerical Methods
Engineering 38 (2): 1579-1592
Ochoa, O.O and Reddy, J.N. 1989. Finite Element Analysis of Composite Laminates,
(7), New York, Pergamon Press
Wawrznek, P.A. and Ingraffea, A.R. 1991. Discrete modeling of crack propagation:
theoretical aspects and implementation issues in two and three dimensions.
Report Number 91-5, Cornell University, New York, USA
49
APPENDIX 6-1
SAMPLE OF TITLE PAGE
by
JANUARY 2006
50
APPENDIX 6-2
SAMPLE OF FRONT HARD COVER
INTAN BT. A. RAHIM
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
JANUARY 2006
51
APPENDIX 7-1
SAMPLE OF CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL
CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL
by
Approved by,
_____________________
(Name of Main Supervisor)
TRONOH, PERAK
January 2006
52
APPENDIX 7-2
SAMPLE OF CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINALITY
CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINALITY
This is to certify that I am responsible for the work submitted in this project, that the
acknowledgements, and that the original work contained herein have not been
___________________________________________
AHMAD NAWAB BIN AHMAD AL-BAB
53
APPENDIX 8-1
SAMPLE OF ABSTRACT
The following abstract is taken from Ramos, Juan, Florentina Davalos, and Jorge
Sandoval. High-brightness CMP from Eucalyptus globulus using a nitric acid
pretreatment. TAPPI Journal 79 (12 December 1996): 169-177. Copyright TAPPI
1996.
54
APPENDIX 9-1
SAMPLE OF TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATION . . . . . . i
ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT . . . . . . iii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION . . . . 1
1.1 Background of Study . . . 1
1.2 Problem Statement . . . 2
1.3 Objectives and Scope of Study . 3
CHAPTER 2: THEORY . . . . . 4
2.1 Leaching . . . . 4
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY . . . . 5
3.1 Elements Determination . . 5
3.2 Sample Preparation . . . 7
3.3 Sample Testing . . . 9
REFERENCES . . . . . . . 25
APPENDICES . . . . . . . 27
55
APPENDIX 9-1
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
56