Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Stan Moody

POB 240
Manchester, ME 04351
207/626-0594
www.moodyreport.wordpress.com

Maine’s Sex Offender Conundrum

March 15, 2011


Author: Stan Moody

On January 3, 2011, when the 125th Maine Legislative Session was still a
gleam in every new legislator’s eye, the Kennebec Journal published an article by
Mal Leary of Capitol News Service. Title of the article: “Lawmakers Brace for Sex
Offender Bills.”
Oh, those sex offenders! We seem to know what to do with every other type
of offender. But sex offenders, who notoriously enjoy a recidivism and probation
violation rate of around 16% of that experienced with your average run-of-the-mill
former prisoner, evoke the shudder complex from the most compassionate among
us.
One way of reducing the bracing factor in dealing with sex offenders is to
educate the public concerning the level of threat posed by various categories of
offense. That would, however, demand that we psychologically profile each
offender, a task above the budgetary tolerance line.
So we are required to render all sex offenders, 14-years old and up, as more
or less equal if we are to comply with the federal Adam Walsh Act. We create
something of a lifelong leper colony for people who have been caught acting out
fantasies prompted by our sex-crazed culture.
What ought to concern us more is the ones who have not yet been caught
and who may be living next door.
Four of the 50 states are now in compliance with the Adam Walsh Act –
South Dakota, Ohio, Delaware and Florida. Thus, violation of any one of 189 sex
offenses, including urinating on the sidewalk, streaking or online sex chat, will
result in a lifetime registry.
Maine legislators, meanwhile, are bracing.
At stake is a cut of $166,000 to $350,000 in Byrne Justice Assistance funds
to law enforcement agencies.
Thankfully, cooler heads are and have been prevailing. “We have had some
serious questions about the Adam Walsh Act so far,” says veteran Sen. Stan
Prison Reform, Maine, sex offender registry, Adam Walsh Act, Stan Moody,
http://scribd.com/stanmoody, https://moodyreport.wordpress.com, Kennebec Journal, Capital News
Service
Gerzofsky, D-Brunswick. His former co- chair of the Criminal Justice committee,
Rep. Ann Haskell, D-Portland, adds that compliance has been a concern in many
states and that change tends to be incremental.
That brings us to the ultimate in inanity – LD 8. As amended, LD 8 would
permit towns with no police department to move the current 750-foot buffer
between sex-offender housing and schools or daycare centers to 2,500 feet, or ½
mile.
That affirms the public stereotype of a sex offender as a sleazy-looking,
unlicensed male lurking behind bushes in the schoolyard. One veteran probation
officer told me that in his 30-year career he could think of only a handful of sex
offenses that originated on school property, and all were committed by staff.
Rep. David Burns, R-Whiting, a committee member and retired state
trooper, is all over LD 8. “I am concerned about keeping children safe,” he avers.
That sets Rep. Burns apart from the rest of us, one would suppose.
The committee verdict on the bill was a hung jury – 6x6 – and has not yet
been reported out to the full legislature. We look forward to fierce debate on the
floor of the House being led by ought-to-pass advocates of this feel-good
opportunity. At stake is an indeterminate fiscal report.
The fact that state legislators are “bracing” themselves ought to be cause
enough for concern. The preponderance of sex offenses occur within families,
carried out by family members or friends to whom it likely never occurs to lurk in
the schoolyard bushes or near a day care.
They get plenty of opportunities right at home. In fact, the most common
profile of a sexual predator is one who looks and acts just like the rest of us.
We could do away with the registry entirely by requiring GPS ankle
monitors to be worn by all sex offenders for however long the court would deem
appropriate. The savings in law-enforcement man-hours would likely far exceed
the loss of funds from the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant Program.
Adam Walsh’s dad, John, argues that we ought to scrap the registry
altogether and start over.
The core problem is a public that naively believes that family members,
pastors, teachers and neighbors are inherently good just because of who they are.
Perhaps we all ought to wear GPS ankle bracelets to protect each other from
enablers who have failed to learn that trust is not something you earn because of
who you are or where you live or how you make your living but by proving
yourself to be trustworthy.
Big brother is watching!

Prison Reform, Maine, sex offender registry, Adam Walsh Act, Stan Moody,
http://scribd.com/stanmoody, https://moodyreport.wordpress.com, Kennebec Journal, Capital News
Service
Author Stan Moody has served in the Maine Legislature, was a prison chaplain and has written
scores of articles on prison reform. He is a board member of Solitary Watch and has received
the ACLU-ME Civil Liberties Baldwin Award. Stan’s articles can be read at
http://www.scribd.com/stanmoody and https://moodyreport.wordpress.com.

Prison Reform, Maine, sex offender registry, Adam Walsh Act, Stan Moody,
http://scribd.com/stanmoody, https://moodyreport.wordpress.com, Kennebec Journal, Capital News
Service

Вам также может понравиться