Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
∗ Corresponding author: Advanced Instrumentation and Control Research Centre, School of Engineering,
University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
Email: H.C.Bheemul@gre.ac.uk, G.Lu@gre.ac.uk, Y.Yan@gre.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 1634 883732, Fax: +44 (0) 1634 883153
3D flame monitoring would also generate ample time the system is installed on a new furnace. An
data for the validation of Computational Fluid optical arrangement using beam-splitters,
Dynamics (CFD) models of flames and furnaces. coupled with converging and diverging lenses, is
another way of capturing multiple images on a
Very limited work has been reported on 3D single CCD camera [5]. However, the system
monitoring and characterisation of flames. has a poor portability due to the complexity of
Preliminary studies on the reconstruction of 3D the sensing arrangement.
models of a flame using imaging techniques has
been described by Annunzotia et al [11], where In the present studies, three identical
only two flame parameters were measured monochromatic CCD cameras are utilised to
including volume and surface area. Tomographic visualise the entire flame, which neutralise all
approach has also been applied in an attempt to the drawbacks associated with other approaches.
reconstruct 3D models of a flame, but no More cameras could be employed to enhance the
measurement of the aforementioned flame performance of the system and improve the
parameters has been made [12]. Three- quality of the 3D reconstruction of flame
dimensional temperature measurement has been models.
performed by multi-spectral tomographic image
analysis [13]. B. System set-up
The instrumentation system, as shown in Fig.1,
In this paper, the design, implementation and consists of three monochromatic CCD cameras,
evaluation of a novel instrumentation system for a frame grabber, and a microcomputer with
the advanced 3D monitoring and characterisation associated software. The cameras are placed at
of fossil fuel fired flames are described. fixed locations A, B and C, separated by an
Experimental work was carried out on a equal angle of 120°. Each camera has a 2/3 inch
combustion test rig under a range of operating CCD panel with a resolution of 816×606 pixels.
conditions. Three identical CCD cameras were The frame grabber is capable of handling three
placed equidistantly on the furnace. The cameras simultaneous video input signals, and uses the
capture 2D images of the flame simultaneously RS-170/CCIR standard acquisition capabilities
from three different directions. Using contour to capture flame images from locations A, B and
extraction methods, the contour of the flame is C simultaneously. The three analogue signals are
extracted from each 2D image and is spatially converted into 2D digital images with 8-bit
arranged in the ‘x-y-z’ co-ordinate system. A set digitisation at a rate of up to 45MHz. The frame
of 3D geometric parameters is then computed grabber supports a transfer rate of 132 MB/s,
from the contours arrangement using various providing real-time transfer of the images to the
image processing techniques. Reconstruction of host computer memory
3D models of the flame is also undertaken using
the flame contours. A dimensional calibration of the system was
carried out by reproducing a geometrical
II. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION relationship between the cameras and the flame.
Each camera has to be calibrated separately due
A. Sensing arrangement to tolerance in size of the CCD sensors. Several
For 3D monitoring and characterisation of a rectangular templates of known dimensions were
fossil fuel fired flame as well as its placed where the flame was to be located, and
reconstruction of 3D models, the imaging system faced one of the cameras. The horizontal and
must be capable of “observing” the entire flame. vertical transformation factors were determined
There are different ways of visualising the flame. to convert the calculated parameters into
A trifurcated image fibre bundle can capture absolute dimensions. This calibration process
three flame images from three different viewing was then repeated for the other two cameras.
locations using a single CCD camera. However,
attenuation of the signal with respect to the
length and bending of the fibre, small field of
views and excessive cost make this approach
less feasible [14-15]. Such a system has limited
flexibility, as the length of the fibre needs to be
altered according to the size of the furnace every
(1) Length (Lf): The length is defined as the
Flame Computer
distance between the furthest point of the flame
Burner centre and the burner outlet. Lf is obtained by scanning
B Image the flame axis. The distance between the highest
Acquisition
120ο
point which intersects the flame contour and the
120ο
burner outlet is the length of the flame (Fig.2(a)).
A
Image
120ο CCD camera Processing (2) Centroid (Xc, Yc, Zc): The centroid is the
‘centre-of-mass’ of the flame and is measured in
C
terms of absolute dimensions (Fig.2(b)). Each
Data
Representation 2D flame image also has a centroid, defined in
the same principle. Three centroids can then be
determined from the three 2D images and are
Fig.1 System set-up arranged in the ‘x-y-z’ co-ordinate system. The
centre of the three points gives the 3D centroid
C. Flame parameters and their measurement of the flame and is used to determine the flame
principles orientation.
A 2D digital image of a flame comprises H×V
pixels. It can be regarded as the spatial (3) Orientation (αf): Due to disturbances in the
distribution of “mass” points in an x-y furnace, the flame may shift off the burner axis.
coordinate plane where the grey-level of each This characteristic of the flame is represented in
pixel representing the density of the presumed terms of its orientation, which is defined as the
mass. The grey-level of each pixel provides angle of deviation of the centroid with respect to
essential information for image processing the burner axis (Fig.2(b)):
operations. After an appropriate threshold is
defined to filter the background noise, the x2 + y2
contour of the flame is extracted from the image α f = tan − 1 c c
(1)
[10]. zc
Using the flame contours, a set of geometrical
parameters, as illustrated in Fig.2, is defined as
follows:
z z
Xc
f g
Centroid
e d
Burner axis
αf
Zc
Outer edge
of the flame Centroid
Lf
c o x
Zc
(0,0,0)
Yc
x
b
Yc
Xc a
y y
(a) Length (b) Centroid and orientation
r3 h r1
r5
Burner θ r2
r4 Camera A
axis r6
r3
r5
nth segment
r4 h
y Camera C
(a) Segmented flame image (b) Enlarge view of the nth segment
300 200
250 150
Centroid (mm)
Lf (mm)
200
100
150 Xc
Yc
50 Zc
100
50 0
0 -50
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Fr (cm 3s-1) Fr (cm3s-1)
(a) Length (b) Centroid
7 140
6 120
Qf×1000 (mm 3)
5 100
αf (deg)
4 80
3 60
2 40
1 20
0 0
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Fr (cm 3s-1) Fr (cm 3s-1)
(c) Orientation (d) Volume
Fig.5 Variation of flame parameters with fuel flow rate
Fig.7 Reconstructed 3D flame models at different time intervals for fuel flow rate 10.2cm3s-1