Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
The project introduced a Community based approach for beel fisheries management
(CBFM). It is a co-management process involves stakeholders from different levels
with defined responsibilities and roles. The fishers are the main actors and the
ultimate beneficiaries. Fisheries Department engages in this process to give
technical training and provide back-stopping supports to BUG for better fisheries
management, Local Administration assists in processing and handing over the beels
to BUG and demarcating beel area, the Wprldfish Center provides research and
study supports in surveying fish biodiversity and socio-economic impact of fisher
community. Beels are selected primarily based on the information of digital
resource mapping and later PRA is carried out to understand the social context,
location of command villages and fisher households, and some other issues related
to beel fishers management, and finally an inventory is made of the interested
fishers for including them in BUG.
Achievements
Major impacts
The beel management activities so far taken
have brought positive changes in beel
resources development and improvement of
livelihoods of the poor fisher community.
The fish biodiversity study recently
conducted by Worldfish Center has revealed
that through systematic management the
production of beel has increased by 11.4%
per hector and total by 19%, the endangered
fish species such as Bacha, Ghaura, Mohashol
Ghora Much, Kalibaus, Rita, Sarputi, Shilong are
getting appeared again. Another livelihood
impact study conducted by the same Figure 5: Fish Sanctuary established in beel by BUG
institute has found that the food crisis for giving shelter to brood fish to increase fish
(food deficit from 1 – 3 months) which was production and fish biodiversity
among 74.7% poor fisher families in 2008 has reduced to 58.4% in 2010. The
access to beel was a dream to poor fisher as it had been traditionally vested in few
local influential people. It was thought that the poor fisher could not pay the lease
fee and thereby their access would not ever be possible. But it has been proved
wrong. The BUGs are regular in paying the lease fee to government account. The
beel user ownership of fisher has largely impacted on the livelihoods of the fishers
as well as the beel ecology, and these are further progressing with their organized
efforts and commitments.
Way forward
However, the access to beel and its management is not an easy task. The process is
often challenged by social disputes, illegal beel encroachment, poaching, and some
other externalities like natural calamities. The project as well as the community is
learning through the process of work and acquiring command over those crises. It is
expected that the community would be more skill in beel resource management
and this system would be a model for effective beel resource management in haor
areas of Bangladesh.