Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Marxist Humanism
and the “New Left”
It is an irony that despite the fact that this tendency is characterised by its emphasis
on subjectivity, it has existed almost entirely within the walls of the academy,
characterised by its objectivity. Although few have been political activists or
organisers (Raya Dunayevskaya is an exception), they have all been prolific
publicists and have been influential in mass movements through their writing and
publishing.
The New Left in the United States emerged out of the student
movement, especially S.D.S. – Students for a Democratic Society.
It was C. Wright Mills who definined the term “New Left,” when he
published an Open Letter to the New Left, addressed to the editors
of the New Left Review in Britain, but indirectly addressing the new
social movements in the U.S. and Europe.
C. Wright Mills died at the young age of 45, but his decidedly
“beatnik” persona was continued by the younger generation of the
New Left in America.
Marshall Berman found the works of the young Marx – including the
Communist Manifesto – spoke to him in a way that the dry tracts of orthodox
Marxism he had been exposed to before did not.
Some of these writers are still alive and well, and most have been published to the
mass market by prestigious bourgeois publishers who enforce their copyrights. This
means that in most cases we are unable to reproduce their works on the Marxists
Internet Archive. In the main, these writers have produced their work in isolation
from the workers’ movement, but this does not ipso facto devalue or negate the
validity of their ideas. What it does represent is how the development of Marxism
has been fragmented by the division of labour in capitalist society, bringing about a
partial separation of the development of theory and the practice of working class
struggle.
For anti-humanist positions, see Socialism and Humanism and Part 2, by George
Novack 1959,
Marxism and Humanism, by Louis Althusser 1964, and
Humanism and Socialism, by Paul Mattick 1965.