Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

International Business Case Study Example

The first part of the paper exhibits the drivers of Global Account Management (GAM) and
Schneider’s reasons to apply this approach. Part two discusses issues regarding the successful
implementation of a global account.

The drivers of GAM can be analysed by using Yip’s (1992) framework of globalisation
drivers. The industry globalisation drivers accounting for GAM are: market, cost and
competitive drivers (Stonehouse, Campbell, Hamill, Purdie, 2005; Anonymous 2000).
The strongest driver is the increasing significance of global customers and their global needs.
The understanding and satisfaction of the global customer needs is crucial in order to build
long-term customer relationships and to avoid the inroad of competitors (Yip, Madsen, 1996;
Harvey, Myers, Novicevic, 2003; Czinkota, Ronkainen, 1997; Wilson, Weilbaker, 2004;
Birkinshaw, Toulan, Arnold, 2001).

Coming from a decentralised purchasing behaviour, multinational companies strongly move


towards a centralised sourcing in order to achieve economies along the supply chain, enhance
the compatibility of equipment and seek uniform global prices and terms of trade (Yip,
Madsen, 1996; Wilson, Weilbaker, 2004; Birkinshaw et al., 2001; Montgomery, Yip, 2000;
Czinkota, Ronkainen, 1997).

Fast changing Technologies and short product life cycle’s force up companies R&D costs.
Organisations try to amortise their high development costs by spreading them over several
markets (Yip, Madsen, 1996).

The strategic moves of key rivals drive GAM. Competitors exploit globalisation potentials
and establish global strategies, e.g. GAM, which forces the other participants in the industry
to react – either by adopting a strategy or by developing a counter strategy (Harvey et al.,
2003; Yip, Madsen, 1996).

Aware of the increasing global challenges, Schneider recognised that in their industry
customer relationship management is the key to competitive advantage. They understand that
long-term customer relationships are only achievable if the company can consistently satisfy
the global customer needs by delivering quality and highly customised products. Their
approach goes to such length, that they try to shift towards a client-led manufacturing. This
highly customer-focused approach forces Schneider to have a deep understanding of the
customer needs. GAM enables Schneider to work closely together with its global customers
and helps Schneider to get a global understanding of the technology and development needs
of their customers. Schneider used GAM to increase the exit barriers (high switching cost) for
their customers as well as the entry barriers for their competitors (Anonymous 2000; Yip,
Madsen, 1996; Kotler, Brown, Adam, Armstrong, 2001).

The development of individual, team and organisational competencies in regard to


relationship management is essential for a successful implementation of a global account.
The effectiveness of the global account is strongly linked with the account manager’s skills
and competencies e.g. cross-cultural management, change management, team management,
leadership and networking. Schneider has to make sure that the right managers are in place
and has to train and educate them regarding the requirements of GAM (Montgomery, Yip,
2000; Wilson, Weilbaker, 2004; Yip Madsen, 1996; Anonymous, 2000).

Support staff and facilities are essential for the successful management of a global account.
The account manager will manage a global team and is in permanent exchange with the
support facilities e.g. Schneider’s headquarter. Schneider has to put global information and
communication systems in place in order to enable global networking and information sharing
(Montgomery, Yip, 2000; Anonymous, 2000).

The involvement of top management in GAM is crucial. On the one hand executive
sponsorship will help Schneider to educate and qualify the global account manager’s. On the
other hand the involvement of top management in GAM will signal its importance towards
Schneider’s stakeholders (Wilson, Weilbaker, 2004).

Schneider and Calchem should undertake a mutual feasibility study of GAM. Strategic
consistency (e.g. time perspective, objectives), expectations regarding e.g. cost savings,
benefits or growth, support systems (e.g. planning, computer technologies, control systems)
and the industry structure must be checked up-on congruence’s between the two partners. A
high level of consistency in these areas will make the co-ordination and co-operation between
Schneider and Calchem successful (Harvey, et al., 2003).
Commitment to GAM on Schneider’s operational, tactical, strategic level is crucial for the
successful implementation of a global account. GAM is based on effective relationship
management which is characterised by vital two-way relations and high commit- and
involvement on multiple levels in both organisations. Continuous flow of information and
feedback between Schneider and Calchem and vice versa, e.g. by implementing customer
panels, councils and regular meetings, will lead to strong performance of the global account
(Montgomery, Yip, 2000; Birkinshaw, et al., 2001).

A reliable reporting process about the performance of the global account must be installed by
Schneider. The reporting process must evaluate performance data, e.g. revenue, profit or
customer satisfaction, on a global basis. Schneider has to implement global performance
measures (Montgomery, Yip, 2000; Wilson, Weilbaker, 2004).
References
Anonymous, 2000. Schneider Electric Global Account Management. International Institute
for Management.
Birkinshaw J., Toulan O., Arnold D., 2001. Global account management in multinational
corporations: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Business Studies,
32:231, 18 pgs
Czinkota M.R., Ronkainen I.A., 1997. International business and trade in the next decade:
Report from a Delphi study. Journal of International Business, 28:827, 18 pgs
Harvey M., Myers M. B., Novicevic M. M., 2003. The managerial issues associated with
global account management: A relational contract perspective. The Journal of
Management Development, 22:103, 27 pgs
Kotler P., Brown L., Adam S., Armstrong G., 2001. Marketing, 5/e, Pearson Education:
Frenchs Forest.
Montgomery D.B., Yip G.S., 2000. The challenge of global customer management.
Marketing Management,.9:22, 8 pgs
Stonehouse G., Campbell D., Hamill J., Purdie T. 2004. Global and Transnational Business:
Strategy and Management, 2/e, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Wilson K., Weilbaker D., 2004. Global Account Management: A Literature Based
Conceptual Model. Mid - American Journal of Business,19:13, 9 pgs
Yip G.S., Madsen T.L., 1996. Global account management: The new frontier in relationship
marketing. International Marketing Review, 13:24, 20pgs

Вам также может понравиться