ROBERTA KELLY

5109 N.E. Ainsworth Street, Portland, Oregon 97218, USA

[503]849.4634, roberta@mortgagegaleria.com
[10-36111 US9CA]

RE: BREACH U.S. CONSTITUTION RULE OF LAW, DUE PROCESS, ET CETERA

BETTY B. FLETCHER, STEPHEN REINHARDT, N. RANDY SMITH
JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMPLAINT1
March 25, 2011

F[215]243.1664, Julene Franki, Executive F[+31] [0]70 364 99 28 [ICJ]

Director, The American Law Institute [ALI];
American Bar Association [ABA]; 4025
Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104; ABA
President Stephen N. Zack, 740 15TH ST NW,
Washington DC 20005; ABA Justice Center
Director Peter Koelling, 321 N. Clark Street
19 Floor, Chicago, IL 60654;F[312]988.5709;
jfranki@ali-aba.org;peter.koelling@americanbar.org
Judge Hisashi Owada, President
Judge Peter Tomka (Slovakia), Vice-President
International Court of Justice
Peace Palace | Carnegieplein 2
2517 KJ The Hague | The Netherlands
T(+31) (0)70 302 23 23

F[401]222.3599, T401.222.3943 U.S. Supreme Court, 1 First Street NE Washington DC 20543

John G. Roberts Jr. Antonin Scalia Anthony M. Kennedy

Clarence Thomas Ruth B. Ginsburg Stephen G. Breyer
Samuel A. Alito, Jr. Sonia Sotomayor Elena Kagan

Garr M. King POCATELLO, Idaho; Senior Judge

F[202]224.3479, Patrick J. Leahy, US Senate The Judiciary, US Constitution, Human-Civil Rights

F[202]228.0466, c/o Dirksen Senate Office Building 224, Washington DC 20515
F[206]727.8325, T206.727.8280; WSB,1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 600, Seattle WA 98101
• Betty B. Fletcher, WSBA #31; US Courthouse,1010 5th Ave #1000, Seattle, WA 98104
California State Bar, 180 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-1639; T 415-538-2000
• Stephen Reinhardt, CABA #28761; see *Harrington, Warden v. Richter [January 19, 2011]
F[801]531.0660; T531.9077; Robert L. Jeffs, President, 645 South, 200 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84111
• N. Randy Smith, POCATELLO, Idaho [Michael W. Mosman, Jay Bybee, BYU]?
F[415]355.8901; T355.8800: Alex Kozinski; Johnnie B. Rawlinson; Robert H. Whaley; 95 Seventh
ST; San Francisco, CA 94103

To avoid an arbitrary discretion in the courts, it is indispensable that they should be bound down by
strict rules and precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty in every particular case that
comes before them; and it will readily be conceived from the variety of controversies which grow out
of the folly and wickedness of mankind, that the records of those precedents must unavoidably swell to
a very considerable bulk, and must demand long and laborious study to acquire a competent
knowledge of them. Hence it is, that there can be but few men in the society who will have sufficient
skill in the laws to qualify them for the stations of judges. http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa78.htm
 RE: BREACH U.S. CONSTITUTION RULE OF LAW, DUE PROCESS, ET CETERA
BETTY B. FLETCHER, STEPHEN REINHARDT, N. RANDY SMITH
JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMPLAINT [P 2 – 2]

To Who It Concerns and To Whom It Concerns:

I’m not, [1] an attorney at law, [2] formally educated in U.S. Constitution due process, [3] licensed in
the practice of law, [4] practiced in a formal high scholastics of law. But, 1 through 4, do not bar me
from being protected in the Bill of Rights, U.S. Constitution. Therefore, the question: George W.
Bush, et al., [ie eg global war on terror] held accountable in the United States of America. A non-
elected poly-addicted drug addict that waged an illegal war, appointed by a U.S. Supreme Court.

Justice Clarence Thomas discovers a serious conundrum reality. Appearing to match Alex Kozinski, et
al. Hence it is, that there can be but few men in the society who will have sufficient skill in the laws to
qualify them for the stations of judges. http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa78.htm. The U.S.
Republic form of due process in the rule of law, the Constitution, was sold down the river by software
transnationals? Messers. Thomas and Kozinski are also the people [WTP] standing in the ownership
of digital money [digits]. [IBM] International Business Machines, [reference, Noam Chomsky].

JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMPLAINT, jurisprudence [who-whom] BETTY B. FLETCHER, STEPHEN

REINHARDT, N. RANDY SMITH, RE: 10-36111, D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01125-KI:

A. The Inquiry to the Hague is supported in ORDER(s), from the U.S. Courts., ie APARTHEID, etc.;
B. On March 21, 2011, FILED ORDER. Misconstruing the language collectively as a Motion for en
banc reconsideration, of the January 13, 2011, order dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Continuing to misconstrue, the motion was denied on behalf of the FULL Court. I requested a Mr.
Lauren J. Paulson honored en banc equal right, [video-taped hearing] accordingly. The U.S.
Constitution regarding Human-Civil Rights — Patrick Leahy, Georgetown Law? Thank you;
C. *Harrington, Warden v. Richter, 10-36111 not complicated, Pro Se are thus prejudiced?;
D. U.S. CONSTITUTION BREACH of the RULE OF LAW, DUE PROCESS, ET CETERA, cease,
desist and STOP! George W. Bush’s appointments and every appointment for the judiciary branch in
the countless numbers on the digital salaries [five, six, ten decades?] whom are insincere at best in
standing. In that, digital “money” is not privately owned, however, it appears the financial innovation
colors of regulations, rules and other illegalities overrule, Wall Streets’ prime examples.

Non-transparent shareholders [air, water, food, land, sea, space, government retirement portfolios,
military, education, medical, legal, dental, media, et cetera] apartheid monopolies. George W. Bush
dictated his base as the haves’ whom decided have nots’ equal subhuman? Pay dirt [fraudulent home
loans and foreclosures] and flesh trading [wars] to recycle genocide false flags, GREEN! A HEARING
formal and in person, my understanding of en banc. Thank you.

Roberta Kelly [US9CA 10-36111], respectfully dated this 25TH day of March 2011
5109 N.E. Ainsworth ST Portland OR 97218 [USA] roberta@mortgagegaleria.com [P503] 849.4634