Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SYNOPSIS
Squish flow control is well known as a key technology for improving knock
we call, a slant squish combustion chamber for new engines. A slant squish
flow in the early expansion stroke, resulting in higher flow velocity and
INTRODUCTION
In an automotive spark ignition engine, a higher compression ratio to achieve lower fuel
consumption and higher engine performance, has been aimed for. By increasing
compression ratio, knock phenomenon becomes a serious issue. Technical development
suppressing knock and increasing compression ratio have been performed in research
institutes and automotive makers all over the world. Squish flow control, as well as
partially reshaping the combustion chamber, are well known key technologies for
improving knock limit in a spark ignition [1-4]. Many combustion chambers with squish
area in automotive spark ignition engines are currently on the market: squish flow has
been consistently used for knock suppression and high compression ratio, and has
contributed to the improvement of thermal efficiency. However, in order to further
improve knock limit in four valve engines, which represent the majority of recent
automotive spark ignition engines, expanding squish area sufficiently results in decreased
engine performance, explained by masking of intake valve surroundings. Additionally,
HC emission is increased by a quench zone increase.
Figure shows a schematic drawing of aslant squish and conventional squish combustion
chamber. Squish area is conveniently formed parallel to flat bottom surface of cylinder
head, whereas in a slant squish combustion chamber, squish area is formed along the pent
roof type combustion chamber wall. In order to achieve a satisfactory squish area in a
slant squish combustion chamber, cylinder head is reshaped and consequently, part of
piston head is formed in a truncated cone shape. As a result, a smoothly shaped
combustion chamber wall on cylinder head which improves effect of squish flow is
achieved. In figure the left striped shows parallel squish area to flat bottom surface of
cylinder head and shaded on the right shows slanted squish area in a truncated cone
shape. Squish areas in both combustion chambers were set to about 16% of total area
squish clearance at 1.2mm.
EFFECTS OF
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
Table lists the main specifications of the test engine. The test engine in a 4-stroke, in-line
4-cylinder, 4-valve, 1.8 liter engine with a compression ratio of 10.0. Two kinds of fuels
with different RON (research octane number) were used whereas a regular fuel with 91
RON was mainly used.
Figure shows the effect of the slant squish combustion chamber on improvement of full
load engine performance. Spark advance represents knock limit ignition timing (trace
knock) or MBT (minimum spark advance for best torque). Compared with a conventional
squish combustion chamber, by a slant squish combustion chamber, a 1-2% volumetric
efficiency improvement and knock limit ignition timing improvement of a maximum of 4
degrees are achieved. By means of both improvements, output torque is improves and
BSFC (brake specific fuel consumption) is decreased in all engine speed ranges.
Figure shows the effect of knock limit improvement of slant squish combustion chamber.
By comparing the differences between MBT and knock limit ignition timing, the
difference of spark advance is reduced and knock limit is improved by slant squish shape.
That is, the slant squish shape has improved the mechanical octane number. Moreover,
torque improvement at MBT is due to improvement of the above-mentioned volumetric
efficiency. In general, an increase of intake air mass raises temperature at the end of
compression stroke and deteriorates knock limit. By a slant squish shape, the
phenomenon of knock limit improvement with an increase of intake air mass is observed.
Figure shows the result of an indicated diagram analysis. The indicated diagram was
continuously sampled from 300 cycles and an analytical calculation was performed.
Compared with the conventional squish shape, the combustion pattern of the slant squish
shape shows a faster burning velocity from middle to final range, though initial burning
velocity is nearly equal. Moreover, figure shows main combustion duration divide into
the first half and second half (10-50% combustion duration: 10-50, 50-90% combustion
duration: 50-90). The ratio of the second half of the combustion duration to the first half
is shown in the upper part of figure. In slant squish shape, the combustion duration
decreases in the second half is larger than that in the first half. It is considered that slant
squish shapes accelerate combustion to the end gas region by accelerating the combustion
of the second half, and consequently improving knock limit [ ]
In order to investigate higher burning velocity of the second half in slant squish shape,
the in-cylinder flow of a slant and conventional squish shape using CFD (computational
fluid dynamics) were simulated. The calculation of the flow was performed by k- model,
by assuming adiabatic compression and expansion of air, neglecting intake, exhaust,
mixing and combustion. Generation of clear squish flows was observed in both squish
shapes. When distinguishing according to the stroke, characteristic differences, shown in
figure were observed in the squish flow of the expansion stroke (positive squish flow
thereafter). Figure shows enlargements around squish area of cross section including the
bore center axis, and the arrows represent the direction and the velocity of the flow.
In the conventional squish shape, as the piston moves down in the expansion stroke, a
main stream toward the bore wall develops, giving the impression of having contact with
the convex part of the cylinder head side. Therefore, because the squish flow vector has a
relatively large downward tendency when approaching squish area, the flow velocity
toward the bore wall near the cylinder head side gradually decreases, and stagnation
occurs around that point.
On the other hand, in the slant squish, as the piston moves down in the early expansion
stroke, a main stream toward the bore wall flows just along the squish area surface from
an early stage, and reaches the bore wall smoothly, without stagnation.
Figure shows the change of squish flow velocity and turbulence energy ay squish area
inlet (X in figure 7: a breathing point of squish flow at TDC in an actual engine). As for
squish flow velocity, the direction of flow toward the bore center axis shows a plus value.
In the case of slant squish shape, compared with conventional squish shape, flow velocity
in the positive squish is slightly lower. On the other hand, flow velocity in the reverse
squish is particularly high in its first stage. At the same time, the turbulence energy in the
reverse squish is similarly high.
Thus, the reverse squish flow with a slant squish shape represents the flow which
accompanies the increase of flow velocity and turbulence energy at the squish area inlet,
and reaches the bore wall just along the squish area surface. A slant squish shape
improves reverse squish effect, resulting in combustion acceleration around the squish
area and consequently, increasing burning velocity of the second half.
The examination was performed as follows. First, a premixed mixture of normal butane
and air was charged into the cylinder, thereafter, gas flow and turbulence were produced
by the piston moving once up and down. In the second piston stroke, ignition and
combustion occurred.
Figure shows examples of the observed combustion processes. White area represents
flame, which when ignited at the bore center point propagates from top to bottom. The
states of increase of the flame area rate in the observed squish area shown in figure.
Compared with a conventional shape, the flame could be observed earlier, and thereafter,
growth of flame proceeded also faster, shown by the inclinations in the graph. By a
photographic observation of flame propagation, it was confirmed that with a slant squish,
flame propagation velocity in squish area is higher.
CONCLUSION
1. With a slant squish shape, volumetric efficiency and knock limit are improved:
and consequently, torque improvement in all engine speed ranges and decrease of
fuel consumption are realized.
2. Volumetric efficiency is improved by decreasing masking of valve surroundings.
3. Mechanism of knock suppression: i) in a slant squish shape, reverse squish flow
with high flow velocity and turbulence energy reaches bore wall without
stagnation. ii) This reverse squish flow accelerates the second half combustion to
the end gas region, and consequently, knock limit is improved.
4. in squish flow control of a four valve engine combustion chamber, a slant squish
area shape utilizing reverse squish flow is important, in addition to previous
acknowledged squish area rate and squish clearance.