“The Flat Earth People” --

Who is Qualified to Translate?

[Meaning the Hebrew and Greek and Chaldee Scriptures.]

Sid Williams, Copyrighted 2011

Seven Lamps Library

“The Flat Earth People” --

Who is Qualified to Translate?

[Meaning Hebrew and Greek and Chaldee Scripture.]

Sid Williams

Exposing Better Bibles Blog and, “The Three Stooges: Wayne Lehman and Irv Larsen and Mike
Sangrey.”

Copyrighted 2011

Seven Lamps Library; Defending the Bible

Contents

1. Who is Qualified to Interpret? ………………………………………………………………… 4

2. The Second Dark Ages ………………………………………………………………………….11
3. Phony Words in the Flat Landers “alleged” Bible Translations ……………………………….. 18
4. Section One: Notification of Persons Criticized ……………………………………………….. 23
5. Judging “Do” and “Don’t” …………………………………………………………………….. 24
6. Using Bible Alphabets ………………………………………………………………………… 35
1

“The Flat Earth People” --

Who Is Qualified to Translate the Bible?

The United States, and most of the world, is being flooded with fake Bible translations today. I am here
to warn you about “false teachers,” and share with you the opinion of the Living God on this subject of,
“witnessing” (which includes Bible translation). In the last two days I received two e-mails, from men
knowing nothing about me, saying, “You don’t know nothing! You should just sit back (on a blog) and
listen.”

“For the all exalting himself will be humbled, and the [one] humbling himself will be exalted” – Luke
14.11.

“From face of old, you will rise, and honor you face of elderly, and fear you from Gods of you
($yhlam), I, He Is (hwhy yna) – Leviticus 19.32.

Note: Here is the fundamental difference between me and my insulters: “I believe the names of the Gods
(Father & Son) should be printed in Bible translations, but they have ‘banned the names of the Gods.’”
This fact had been posted on their blog, but I was told to keep quiet and listen. [They only survive by
censorship.]

Axiom: Only persons with the names of the Gods know God.

This was confirmed by the, “Three Blasphemies of the Beast”:

`So they worshipped the Dragon (Satan – 12.9) who gave authority to the Beast (Papacy), and they
worshipped the Beast … And he was given a mouth (Early Church Fathers) speaking great things (Daniel
7.8) and blasphemies (flood – 12.15), and he was given authority to continue 42 months (Dan 7.25, Rev
11.2). Then he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme His name (Ihsouj Cristoj –
changed to, “Jesus Christ,” in AD 1738), His dwelling (tabernacle = New Jerusalem – Rev 21.1-3 – on
earth), and those who dwell in heaven (Resurrection in AD 77 – “in ten days/years” – Rev 2.10) – Rev
13.4-6.

So then, my insulters support the “name change” for God, and I oppose it.

Axiom: “For the natural man seeks not the things of the Spirit of the God, for they are foolishness to him,
nor can he know, for they are spiritually discerned” – First Corinthians 2.14.

Axiom: “But you (saved) are not in flesh but in Spirit, if indeed Spirit of God (Qeou) houses (oikei) in
you, but if anyone does not have Spirit of Anointed (Cristou), this [one] is not of Him (autou)” –
Romans 8.9.
Axiom: “And not as Moses, putting a veil on the face of him, for the sons of ‘He is prince of God’
(larvy) (mistranslated, “Israel”) not to look intently toward the end (of Law) of the [thing] passing away
(present participle). But the minds of them were hardened, for until [time] of today (AD 57) the same veil
remains, not being unveiled during the reading of the Old Testament, for in Anointed (Cristw) it passes
away. But until today (AD 57), when Moses is read a veil lies on the heart of them. But whenever he
turns toward Lord (Kurion), the veil is taken away [for a few]” – 2 Corinthians 3.13-16.

Therefore, the End of the Law was demonstrated by Moses, as recorded by Paul, but the Jews missed the
message. Deluded men today still do not know that the Law had passed away. The Savior of the world
(Ihsouj Critoj) even dated the End of the Law while still in the flesh.

Axiom: “For I say to you, truly, until ever the heaven (Jewish government) and the earth (nation of Israel)
pass away, no, not one iota or one tittle will pass from [body] Law until ever all [things] come to be
[meaning, Judgment Day and founding of New Jerusalem in, “ten days/years”; AD 77.]

Axiom: “And when the unclean spirit (sin) goes out from the man, she goes through waterless places
seeking rest, and does not find. Then she says, ‘I will return into the house (body of man) of me, from
where I came. And coming she finds [him] standing empty [no Spirit of God], swept, and put in order.
Then she goes and takes along with herself seven other spirits (sins) more evil [than] herself, and going
in, she dwells there, and the last (state) of that man (generic) [is] worse (state) [than] of the first (things).
Thus she will be also in the generation (AD 28-77), this, in the evil (War with Rome)” – Matthew 12.43-
45.

Conclusion: People without the “presence” of the Spirit of the God are doomed!
And – where does this leave our Bible translators without the names of the Gods?
These “real names” are not hard to spot. By the system of “transposing” some names are found. Others
are found by “translation,” which is not hard.

Transposing: “Ihsouj” is transposed, “Iesous.” This name has no translation for it was translated from
Hebrew. The definition is in the Hebrew name, mistranslated, “Joshua.” There is no letter “J” in either
the Hebrew or the Greek alphabets. Hebrew reads right-to-left.
[vwhy = He (Y) The (H) [One] Saving ([vw). Note: The, “Internal Yod” (Y) is changed to, “Waw” (W)/;
that is: [vy changed to [vw.
English Bibles for many centuries have noted, “Jesus” (Matthew 1.21) to mean, “Savior.”

Crisma = “anoint – 16 times.

Cristoj = “Anointed Male.” The case ending, “TOS” is identified, “single, masculine, nominative
(subject) case. The declension for this word is:
Cristoj = single, male, subject (Nominative Case)..
Cristou = Genitive case (possessive).
Cristw = Dative case, object of a preposition.
Criston = Accusative Case (object of a verb). And – there is no word, “Christ” in the Bible.

Now, consider the Old Testament names of the “Gods” (myhla).

“Single God” is la – Genesis 14.19 - #410 - Strong’s Concordance, page 533, middle column. This
column has 8 - #410s for “single God” and 3 - #3069s for “single God” and 76 - #430s for “single God.”
And – only #410 is correct. This is an error of 90.1 percent. Why such sloppy work?
The Jews are still bragging today about, “Changing the name of God.” The Christians have exposed this
nonsense for several centuries, but being too lazy to work, they still copy the Jews’ lies for their Old
Testament.

TWO BIBLICAL LANGUAGES THAT ARE UNKNOWN TODAY: HEBREW & GREEK

1. The Jews Are Self-confessed Liars.

"David Biven ... 1. God's name is not 'Jehovah' or 'Yehovah.' In my article I explained that this
term originated due to a lack of Christian awareness of Jewish custom. The Masoretes
superimposed (1) the vowel signs (2) of the word adonai upon the four consonants of God's
name. Thus YHWH would be read as adonai ... The American Standard Version and The
Living Bible use 'Jehovah' (4) for YHWH throughout."
JerusalemPerspective :: View Topic - Jehovah and Jeshusa

ERRORS IN THIS STATEMENT:

(1) Moses pronounced a curse on anyone adding to his words (Deut 4.2; - this included
Masoretes and vowels); Solomon instructed men to avoid being a "liar" by not adding to the
"words of Gods" (myhla); see: Prov 30.5-6. Iesous Anointed (Ihsouj Cristoj) (Jesus Christ to
the Pope) cursed anyone adding to His prophecy (Rev 22.18-19). So then, Mr. David Biven, and
the Masoretes, were "cursed" and "liars."

(2) The Hebrew language is defined in the Modern Reference Encyclopedia, and others, as
having 22 consonants, AND - no vowels! [Only religions add vowels to the Hebrew language.]

(3) The word of Gods does not restrict the "uttering" of the name of Gods, but on the contrary, it
teaches, "Whoever calls the name of 'He Is' (hwhy) will be saved" (Joel 2.32).

(4) "But the American Revisers, after a careful consideration, were brought to the unanimous
conviction that a Jewish superstition, which regarded the Divine Name as too sacred to be
uttered, ought no longer to dominate in the English or any other version of the Old Testament ..."
- ASV, 1901, Preface, p. iv.

SUMMARY: That is an awful lot of proof that the Jews, and their "changing YHWH to adonai"
is LYING! Lord, The Almighty God (Rev 4.8) is quite capable of spelling His own name, and
He needs not any help from the Jews.

2. The Christians Have Always Exposed The Jews As Liars.

We had heard this anecdote of Jews changing the names of God since the early 1940s. This is
also exposed on many Internet web sites, such as, Wikipedia a free encyclopedia.

3. Two Names of "Gods" (myhla) Changed By The Jews.

A) Strong's #430: myhla - plural of 433, gods in the ordinary sense ...
B) Matthew Henry, 1706, and Robert Jaimeson, 1848, wrote Bible commentaries on Genesis,
and they translated Genesis 1.1 to read "Gods" (plural). They even went further, saying that it
meant the trinity.
C) Strong's #3068: hwhy ... [The definition was wrong – changed to, “The Lord” (nwdah).]
D) Names of God In Judaism: The Tetragrammaton -- In appearance, YHWH is the third person
imperfect verb "to be"; meaning, "He Is" ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_God_in_Judaism

The Jews banned this name in 250 BC, with their Greek Septuagint, and it remained hidden for
over 2,200 years.
But recently, God has revealed His name to several persons, and organizations, working
independent of each other. This writer had the name revealed to him, before he looked for other
men with this knowledge on the Internet.

4. The Christians Have Always Promoted The Lies of The Jews.

The Geneva Bible (1599), the KJV of 1611, and the Douay OT, and Young's Literal Translation
of the Holy Bible (1868), and all the other Bible Translations have contained these two corrupted
names of God: (1) "God" singular (la), for "Gods" plural (myhla); and "the Lord" (nwgah) for
"He Is" (hwhy).
NOTE: "God" singular is Strong's #410 (la). It was recorded 395 times, compared to
"Gods" (myhla; plural) recorded 2,492 times.

Wikipedia a free encyclopedia named "Kennicott" (a Jew) as the translator of all Old Testament
translations in 1850. [And this is still true today. There has never been a Christian translation of
the Old Testament, with the "Father and Son" principle in it.]

5. The Pope and the Christians Banned Three More Names of The Gods.

A) Iesous is corrupted to read, "Jesus" even though neither Hebrew nor Greek has a letter "J."
[This happened in AD 1738 when the British invented the letter "J." The 1611 KJV has no letter
"J." "King James" reads "King Iames" in the Authorized Edition.]
B) "Anointed" (Cristoj) was transliterated to read, "Christ." [This practice of striking off the
letters "O" and "S" is termed "purging."]
C) "The God" (O Qeoj) was corrupted to read "God" only. ["God" in the genitive case is
sometimes without the definite article ("the"), and sometimes with it. "God" in the nominative
case, when it begins a sentence is without the definite article. But most of the time in the New
Testament the Scripture reads: "The God."]

6. The Bible Translators Vow Not To Be Bound By The Words of The Living God.

THE TRANSLATORS TO THE READER..

"Another things we think good to admonish you of (gentle Reader) that we have not tied
ourselves to an uniformity of phrasing, or to an identity of words, as some peradventure would
wish that we had done, because they observe, that some learned men somewhere, have been as
exact as they could that way. Truly, that we might not vary from the sense of that which we had
translated before, if the word signified that same in both places (for there be some words that be
not the same sense everywhere) we were especially careful, and made a conscience, according to
our duty. But, that we should express the same notion in the same particular word; as for
example, if we translate the Hebrew or Greek word once by PURPOSE, never to call it INTENT;
if one where JOURNEYING, never TRAVELLING; if one where THINK, never SUPPOSE; if
one where PAIN, never ACHE; if one where JOY, never GLADNESS, etc. Thus to mince the
matter, we thought to savour more of curiosity than wisdom, and that rather it would breed scorn
in the Atheist, than bring profit to the godly Reader. For is the kingdom of God to become
words or syllables? Why should we be in bondage to them if we may be free, use one precisely
when we may use another no less fit, as commodiously?"
NOTE: Copied from "The Holy Bible, 1611 Edition, King James Version"; published by
Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee; printed in the United States of America,
1993.1

The translators made every effort to make their non-conformity to the word of God seem
"innocent" and "harmless." But then, God had a different opinion. See above: Deut 4.2, Prov
30.5-6, Rev 22.18-19.

We are a nation without a single Bible translation, and only one “skeleton” translation (mine).

Axiom: When a man (David Biven) or groups of men (Jews and Christian “alleged” translators -
KJV) inform you that they will “lie to you” – then conscience dictates that you believe nothing
from them.

Now, you are left with two choices: 1) You must translate your own Bible, or: 2) You can examine my
“Real Words Bible.”

We will demonstrate the great extents to which this “lying” has been carried on.

Strong's #1696 - RBD; dabar (rbd) –25 definitions.

Strong's #1697 -RBD; dabar (again) - 31 definitions.
Strong's #1698 - RBD; deber - 3 definitions.
Strong's #1699 - RBD; dober - 2 definitions.
Strong's #1699 - RBD; dibber - word.

8. #1697 (rbd) – speak – 987 times.

ERRORS: act (50), advice (1), affair (2), answer (7), any (2), because (10), book (7), business
(8), care (1), case (1), cause (8), certain (2), chronicles (29), concern (3), counsel (1), decree
(1), deed (5), disease (1), due (2), duty (2), effect (1), eloquent (1), errand (2), hurt (1),
language (1), manner (16), matter (62), message (3), thing (236), oracle (17), ought (2), parts
(1), pertaining (2), portion (4), promise (37), provision (1), purpose (1), question (1), rate (5),
reason (1), report (2), request (2), sake (2), saying (149), sentence (2), so (1), some (1), talk
(59), task (2), done (1), thought (3), thus (1), tidings (4), what (1), wherewith (1), word (718),
work (1). TOTAL ERRORS: 1,428 [32.8 percent error]. Total (speak) – 2,915.

NOTE: So then, with this word, “we have more apples than lemons – but no way near the truth.” What
does the word, “because” have to do with, “speaking?” What does “errand” have to do with “speaking?”
What does “rate” have to do with “speaking?” What does “parts” have to do with “speaking?”
What does “hurt” have to do with “speaking?” What does “some” have to do with “speaking?” Now if a
man tried to speak to you in a language with 57 definitions for one written word (as the Bible translators
has done with this single Hebrew word), then you would be “in the dark” concerning his message, as you
are “in the dark” concerning the message of God in the Bible. “Does it mean, ‘affair’ or ‘effect’?” You
would never know!
Note: Most of these “Lies” are still in the modern “alleged” translations.

Today’s “alleged” Bible translations were produced with the motto:

“Copying is better than translating.”

Examining, “Better Bibles Blog, Wayne Lehman and Mike Sangrey and Irv Larsen.

1. Method: “Thought to Thought.” After detailing his disgust for, “literal translations,” Mr. Lehman
claims that he will translate [whoops! That is not possible.] the “thoughts” of the writers.
Note: The “literal translators” of ages past had interpreted the Bible to accurately predict the future.
[That is not possible with a “non-literal, alleged” translation of “imaginnary thoughts.”]
2. Method: “Translate to the intended audience.” Whowee! God’s words of who the message is far
is not good enough?

The Rebuttal of These Two (Imaginary) Methods.

A) “Simple, he believes to all of speaking, and prudent has understanding to bless him” – Prov
14.15.
Note: This was beat into my head as a youth by constant repetition. It was as though they had
engraved it on the head of a railroad spike, and hammered it into my skull. This will be with me till death.
B) “If anyone speaks, as words of God, in order that in all [things] the God may be glorified through
Iesous Anointed (Ihsoun Criston) in whom is the glory (resurrection) and the power
(forgiveness of sin) into the ages of the ages. Truly” – 1 Peter 4.11.
NOTE: This describes a lifestyle of dedication, and self-control, and constant study of the Bible.
Many years are required to even begin to achieve this goal.
C) “First knowing this, that all of prophecy of Scripture occurs not of own ‘on have loosing’ (epi
ewj lu)” – 2 Peter 1.20.
Note: In other words, “thought to thought” is anti-biblical and hogwash.

Proof that Prophets Knew not What they Said.

1) “For you (Israel) and the children of you is the promise and to all the [ones] into far away, as many as
ever Lord, the God (Kurioj o Qeoj) of us will call” – Acts 2.39.

Note: Peter knew not what these words spoken meant. How will Wayne and his Better Bibles Blog
translate, “Thought to thought? Impossible! Peter needed a vision from God (Acts 10.10-16) and the
Spirit speaking to him (10.19) and hearing, “While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit
fell upon all those who heard the word. And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as
many as came with Peter, because the gift of Holy Spirit has been poured out on the Gentiles also”
(10.44-45).

But, Wayne and his buddies claim to have higher powers than the prophets of God. They know
(supposedly) what the thoughts of Peter were (when he spoke (Acts 2.39), although Peter himself knew
nothing about his words at that time.

2) Note: Daniel knew not what he was saying:

“I heard but I did not understand. So I asked, ‘Lord of [me] (ynda), what after her, these?’ And he
(angel) said, ‘Go “Judge of God”(Daniel; laynd) for closing ones and sealing ones, the words, until time
of end (AD 77 = Rapture)”’” – Daniel 12.8-9.
But then, Wayne Lehman, and Better Bible Blog understood, right? [Just ask them. They are superior to
the prophets of God and to the Word of God.]

Digression: Wayne translated “her” (authn) as “it” (auto).

Personal pronouns are covered in the first week of, “Introduction to Greek.” [Maybe Wayne, and most
other Bible translators missed the first week, for this error is common to all of them. In our public school
systems, the “personal pronouns” are covered in the first grade/year.
[Poor Wayne, he doesn’t have a first grade education – in Greek.]

3) Moses predicted, in about 1585 BC, the annihilation of Israel. See: Deuteronomy, Chapter 28. But he
had not a clue to when and where this would happen. [But, Wayne knew his “thoughts.” Who was
Moses’ “intended audience?” There was no nation of ‘He is Prince of God’ (Israel; larvy).]
2

The Second Dark Ages (Satan Loosed A Little: Revelation 20.3)

The reader will be shocked to learn that, “In my youth, men believed that, ‘God is alive! – today! – on
Earth!’”

As Abram worshipped other gods on the other side of the (Euphrates) river” (Joshua 24.15), and then was
spoken to by ‘He Is’ (hwhy) to leave his country (and this has been termed as, “Revealed Religion” by
many writers), in like manner I received, “Revealed Religion” (by “predestination” – meaning to be in the
right place at the right time) in 1943, in East St. Louis Illinois, at the Lansdowne Church of Christ.

Until this special day, I had never heard anyone in the congregation of my youth express any belief that,
“God is alive.” They were suckered by the Pope to teach, as he said, “All we believe is Jesus Christ and
Him crucified” (1 Corinthians 2.2):

“And I having come to you, came not according to excellence of speech or wisdom, declaring to you the
testimony of the God. For I determined not to know anything among you, if not Iesous Anointed (Ihsoun
Cristovn) and this one crucified. And I was with you in weakness and in fear and in much trembling.
And the message of me and publishing of me [was] not in persuasive wisdom of human words but in
demonstration of Spirit and power” – 1 Corinthians 2.1-4.

The “demonstration of Spirit and power” is not the Pope’s interpretation of these verses. My
congregation was descendant from, “The Restoration Movement,” of the 1800s. They taught me much
wisdom about, “No church doctors” and, “The pulpit is the fountain head of error,” and, “No creed but
Christ, no book but the Bible.”

But, they had lost the main message, “The Millennium was expected in the 1800s, closely associated with
the, “Fall of Babylon.” See: Rev 14.6-8. This “Fall of Babylon” is documented in all encyclopedias to
have been on September 20, 1870. See subject topic, “Italy.” “Italy” drove Papacy and Pope Pius IX out
of Rome on that day. [On September 20, 2009, the United Press had an article in the local papers, “This
day in history,” and they repeated the Pope’s disaster.]

But my congregation had forgotten all this good message in the Bible, and did not believe that, “God is
alive!”

But the, “God has His witnesses.”

A traveling speaker, who was an expert in prophecy, taught us a summary of revelation – in one hour.

This was thrilling for a ten year old boy like me. [Every ten year old has the right to hear this message
instead of “programmed” Atheism from a publishing house.]

So I learned of the Pope killing people for having a Bible translation in their possession. Then came the
Papal Inquisition from Rome. And the second Inquisition from Spain. [In the eighth grade, we studied
the “Inquisitions” again in World History, in the public school.]
The Protestant Reformation followed, with dates. Then, “The Great Awakening,” and the “Second Great
Awakening.”
Then, “The Restoration Movement,” in the 1800s.
Climatical was the, “Fall of Babylon,” in 1870.
I was terribly excited then. “1870 is mighty close, I wonder what will happen in my lifetime\?”
Before I had finished these thoughts, the speaker was reading:

“And after the thousand years [are expired – from the Pope, but not in the Bible], the Satan will be loosed
from the prison of him, and he will go out to deceive the Nations (Churches) in the four quarters of the
Earth (New Jeruusalem), the Gog and the Magog (Ecumenical Movement) …” – Revelation 20.7-8.

The speaker informed us that this was future – in 1943.

“Hey, that is not what I wanted to hear. Well, you must take what you get. If the Devil comes in my
lifetime, I will spot him. You can bet on that!” [These were the thoughts of a serious minded ten year old
boy.]

Digression: The non-Papal translation of Revelation 20.7:

“And with (meta) the thousand years [no words, “are expired”] the Satan will be loosed …”

But the speaker did not stop in the middle of the story, as deceivers are prone to do.
Then came, “The Last Battle.

“… And fire came down from [throne] of the heaven, from [place] of the God and ate them up. The
Devil (Ecumenical Movement = Gog, Magog, Devil), the [one] deceiving them was thrown into the lake
of fire and of holy God (Qeiou), also where the Beast (Papacy) and the False Prophet [are]. And they will
be tormented day and night into the ages of the ages” – Revelation 20.9b-10.

This is the promise of God for us today. Then the Final Resurrection will follow (20.11-15).

And, due to Free Speech, which Wayne, and his buddies are against, all this spiritual wisdom was mine.

But, when I was older, I studied the “world famous” Bible expositors on Revelation, and – I found the
same story. I have named these, “Living God Writers” – unlike Wayne Lehman, and his supporters.

I have a small library of, “Living God Writers” – it used to be larger, but I had to move some out because
of lack of room. So now, I will treat you to their remarks about, “God is alive today.”

Geneva Bible, 1599, proclaimed their belief in the Living God, but their testimony was tainted because
they tried to make the entire book of Revelation apply to their present generation.

Matthew Poole Commentary, 1680, Pilgrims writing to honor their deceased teacher.
42 Months: AD 600- 1860. “Battle of Two Sicilies” predicted [which caused Pope Pius IX to lose two-
thirds of the territories of the Papal States.]

“Armageddon” would be a war with the Pope and the Ottoman Empire losing the battle.
“Ottoman’s” surrendered “unconditionally on October 29, 1918.
First World War had five million Catholics killing each other.
Revelation 20.9b-10: “… Gog and Magog … The meaning is that God would destroy their power to
deceive with a quick and terrible destruction, such as is that destruction of person and places which is by
fire.” Also, such as happened September 20, 1870 when Papacy and Pope Pius IX were run out of Rome
by the, “Italians.” [This was the foundation of, “Italy.”]

Note: Catholic Churches in the United States have paid 6.2 billion dollars in legal settlements since 1950
for “child molestation.” Just recently, the Vatican Bank has been fined, and is under continued
investigation for “money laundering.”

Reason and Revelation, 1868, R. Milligan.

“Had not the star (Muhammad) first fallen from heaven (Arab Government), the bottomless pit would not
have opened, and consequently, the smoke and darkness and the locusts (Arabs) would never have
covered the provinces of Western Asia,” page 87.

Note: Ottoman Turks were part of the Triple Alliance trying to conquer the world in First World War,
who surrendered in 1918, and have instigated world wide revolutions since 1990, supported by U. S.
taxpayers. Islams are “Antichrist” denying the Son of God (1 John 4.1-3).

The People’s New Testament; with Notes, 1891, B.W. Johnson.

42 Months: AD 533-1793. Compare; Poole, AD600-1860.

Revelation 16.10-11, Fifth bowl of wrath of God.

“In that year [1870] France was compelled to withdraw her soldiers to defend her soil from German
invasion. This was the opportunity of Italy. The Papal army was scattered by the soldiers of Victor
Emmanuel; the Pope shut himself in the Vatican, and Rome became the capital of new Italy” – page 482.

Halley’s Bible Handbook, 1962, Henry H. Halley.

“Third Part of Men Killed” (Rev 9.18). This may refer to the Fall of the Eastern Roman Empire (AD
1453), the last remaining “Third” of the original Roman Empire, at the hands of the Turks.” Agreeing
with other, “Living God Writers.” Page 719.

The Overthrow of Sanity Leading to Second Dark Ages (AD 1959-2004).

The “Dark Ages” was ushered in by “Censorship” – denying the “Living God” – and His proofs of
Existence, Prophecy and the Book of Revelation, and History.

The Pope teaches, “Revelation is confined to the First Century.”

But then, his writers are mentally instable, for they write that, “Armageddon” (which ended in 1918) will
be seven years of war at the end of Time. After repeatedly saying, “Revelation is not a prophecy,” they
end up saying, “Jesus will come at the End of Time for the First Resurrection.” Then they add, “The
Final Resurrection will be the bodies only.”

Paul wrote, “WE will all be changed in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet … For
this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immorality” – 1 Cor. 15.51-53.

Sounds to me like, “No bodies.” And – What does “we” mean? [Is it not still – you and me?]

We will quote the Dark Ages writers next to show you the contrast.

Revelation, 1992, Leon Morris.

42 Months is literal for the fall of Jerusalem; AD 66-70. [This is taught by the Pope.]
5 Months = “actual life of a locust.” [His preface said the book is full of symbols.]
“Their hair was long, like women’s hair.” [He did not identify the ‘locusts.”]
“A third of the sun darkened.” [“But perhaps John is not greatly concerned with consistency” (compare:
Rev 6.13; “where the stars in the sky fell to earth”).]
“Fall of Babylon” [confirmed, September 20, 1870] is the collapse of civilization.” [Then what are
chapters 20-22 about? – Sid].
`”Beast and False Prophet cast alive into lake of fire” – Rev 19.20. Mr. Morris: “Being cast into the lake
of fire signifies utter destruction.”
“Whenever (hotan)” the thousand years end” – Mr. Morris.
“With (meta) thousand years, the Satan will be loosed” – Sid Williams.
“Thousand years symbolic for ‘completeness’” – Mr. Morris. [Should read: “With the thousand years the
Dragon will be loosed.”]
He had properly identified, “the martyrs as the First Resurrection,” and that they reigned as ‘priests.”
Also, he was correct, “This was not about the return of Christ” – as the Pope teaches.
Satan was bound the thousand years from deceiving the Nations (Churches) – Sid.
“In the end (Rev 20.11-15) people will either share in the bliss of heaven or find their place in the lake of
fire” – Morris.
So, he had the beginning right – First Century – and the middle wrong – and the End right. This is the
Pope’s “Big Gap Teaching.”

Interpretation, 1989, M. Eugene Boring.

#666 = Nero – [from the Pope.]
Armageddon =- End of Time – [from the Pope.]
Millennium – denied – [From the Pope.]
Final Resurrection (Rev 20.11-15) – [denied – from the Pope.]
42 Months = End of Time. [Chapter 11 ??]
Five Months – not mentioned.
Hour, day, month, year – not mentioned.
Smoke, sulfur, fire – not mentioned.
“Parthians” – mentioned – [From the Pope, but not in Revelation.]
“Great Whore” = goddess Roma – [not in Bible – from the Pope.]
“Woman clothed with sun” = Queen of heaven (paganism) and Eve. [Who would compare Eve to a
pagan goddess?]
“7 heads” – [not a number!]
New Heavens [on earth – Rev 21.1-3 – Sid] = Eternal World – [From the Pope.]
“Religious quacks and cranks of history,” page 61. [Meaning, the Bible is not historical.]

“The Book of Revelation,” 1966, Foy E. Wallace, Jr.

#666 = Nero – [From the Pope.]
Temple of God (Rev 11) = Jerusalem. [This book is progressive history, and Jerusalem was resurrected
in Rev 4 & 5 & 7.]
“Future wars and revolutions are not the object of visions in Revelation,” page 17. [Fall of Babylon,
Tenth of City fell, Israel annihilated (Rev 14.20, 19.17-18).]
“Baptism = marriage of the Lamb.”
“Day of the Lord” = judgment, not Sunday. [Correct: Day of Lord was first year of Jews´ calamitous war
with Rome.]
“Prophecy ended with the law – at the cross.” [This is at odds with his statement, “New Heavens =
Eternal World,” and, “”Great Whore = goddess Roma” – [She fell in AD 476.]
“But the visions of John were based on existent conditions and surrounded by events already in a state of
development. This fact removes the ‘Book of Revelation’ from the category of ‘future prophecy’ and
places it in the classification of apocalyptic vision relating to the fortunes of the New Testament churches
in the midst of Jewish, Roman, and Pagan persecutions comparable and parallel with the apocalypses of
Ezekiel in relation to the fortunes of the Old Testament Israel” – page 9.
[So then, since Israel was annihilated, AD 66-73, there has been no word of God, and no God – Sid.]
“Coming of the Lord refers to his presence in the apostles” – page 124. [So then, “coming on the clouds”
was not true!]
“Revelation is not the last book of the Bible” – page 163. [The Bible sealed with a curse by Iesous – Rev
22.18-19.]
5 Months (AD 632-782) = war with Jerusalem (AD 66-73). [Five months from July AD 66 = December
AD 66. “Five Years” = AD 66 – 71.]]
“No literal Euphrates River” – page 189. [The source of the “Euphrates” was the “literal” boundary of
the Arab Expansion” for “the day, hour, month, year” (Rev 9.15 = 391 years and 15 days – ended in AD
1071.)]
Abaddon (Rev 9.11 = Muhammad) = Satan = Roman Emperor.
Hour, day, month, year = suspension of time. [If these words were not allowed by Mr. Wallace, you can
imagine what else was denied in these 10,000 megabytes.]
“Beast from the sea (Papacy)” = Rome – [From the Pope.]
“Beast from the earth (Pope)” = Jews.
“Two Witnesses (Israel & Iesous’ From Calling) = Prophets & Apostles – [From the Pope.]
“Two Anointed Ones (Israel & Iesous’ From Calling)” = Zerubabbel & Joshua. [Joshua died 562 BC and
Zechariah’s vision in 518 BC.]
“Prophets end at cross” (AD 32) – [Agabus prophesied famine in days of Claudius – ruled AD 41-54.]
“Her (Mary’s – Rev 12.4) Child (Iesous)” – “It is not singular” – Wallace, page 266.
[(to teknon authj) = give birth to the child of her (neuter, “singular,” accusative – Mounce’s Analytical
Concordance) – page 266, - “and it is not singular number any more than the use of the word “mother”
when used in a collective sense” – Mr. Wallace. [My “mother” was singular, how about yours? Here Mr.
Wallace had denied the birth of the Savior. “Why was ‘child’ neuter gender?” This is because, “The
Lamb” is neuter gender because in the Law sometimes the “lamb” was recorded male gender and at other
times it was recorded feminine gender.]
“Dragon” = Paganism. [Dragon = Satan – Rev. 12.9.]
“Michael” = Truth of Christianity. [There is no Christianity if the “child” was plural. In Hebrew,
Michael = who as God? (lakym) – Strong’s Hebrew #4317 = Who (ym) as (K) God La)?]
“No fall of angels” – page 274.
“So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old (Genesis 3), called the Devil and Satan who
deceives (participle) the whole world; he was cast to earth [after deceiving ‘Being’ (hwh) (Eve)], and his
messengers (angels) were cast out with him” – Rev 12.9.
Note: This is the most accurate description of “fallen angels” in the whole Bible.
“Beast from sea” = Rome – [From Pope = Papacy.]
Seven heads = 7 hills of Rome – [From Pope. B.W. Johnson, 1891 = Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Media-
Persia, Greece, Rome, Eastern Rome – from Rev 13 – but Johnson copied Pope in Rev 17.]
“Land Beast = Palestine’s Roman rulers,” page 289. [= Pope.]
“It is done = Fall of Jerusalem.” [= End of Armageddon – AD 1918.]
Rev. 16.18-21 = Fall of Jerusalem. [= Fall of Ottoman Empire (Turks) and great Babylon (Catholic
Church) was remembered = 5 million Catholics killed in Europe – 1914-18.]
“Babylon = apostate in Jerusalem.” [Babylon = 10 Papal States (Horns) or territory ruled by the Pope.]
7 Bowls of Wrath (Rev 16) – no comment.
“Armageddon = no date or location,” page 335. [Armageddon = First World War and subsequent battles
between Greece and Turkey, 1921-22.]
Note: The Churches of Christ (Non-instrumental) embraced Mr. Wallace as “their teacher,” of Atheism
and Bible denial. They know not the names of their Gods, and they believe not the words of the Gods .
One of their speakers, Dr. Don Taylor (imported from Tennessee) taught (in Illinois), “Revelation was
confined to the First Century just as First Corinthians was confined to the First Century.
I informed the mighty church doctor that, “First Corinthians was about the resurrection.”
What a temper tantrum followed this. [Although he was exposed as a liar, everyone continued to be in
subjection to him.]

Summary.
“The Living God Writers” interpreted progressive historical events to the end of time with names and
dates.
“The Speculative Theology” denied all prophecy, and the word of God, and “left no stone unturned” to
(vainly) prove that the Bible is not true, and, “There is no God.”
God is eternal (meaning, forever).

“Iesous Anointed (Ihsouj Cristoj) the same, yesterday and today (!) and into the ages” – Hebrew 13.8.
What this meant, in a limited sense, was that Iesous was King of kings (Sun - Rev 19.16) and High Priest
(Moon – Heb 8.1) and Living Prophet (Morning Star – Rev 22.16); or – “the government (Sun, Moon,
Stars) was on His shoulders” – Isaiah 9.6.

“into the ages of the ages” meant that this was only true until the next age, New Jerusalem, AD 77.

Then “the divided” God (Father & Son) was recorded to have been “reunited.”

“And being ‘He Is’ (hwhy) to kinging over all of the earth in day, the-this, ‘He Is’ (hwhy) one, and name
of Him, he is one (dxa hyhy)” – Zechariah 14.9.

Now this was a prophecy so far in the future and so vague that no one could understand it. The Son of
God and His apostles did not mention it in these words but had parallel messages of this prophecy.

“Now when the all have been subjected to Him (Iesouj), then the Son will be subjecting the all to Him
(God), in order that the God (singular) truly the all in all” – 1 Corinthians 15.28.

And – this agrees perfectly with Zechariah 14.9.

“The [one] overcoming [the Judgment], I will make him a pillar in the temple of the God of Me
(separated Gods in AD 67), and no he will not go out [any] longer. And I will write on him the
[unknown] name of the God of Me, and the name of the city of the God of Me, the New Jerusalem who
comes down (!!! – Rev 21.1-3 – to earth) from [place] of the heaven from [throne] of the God of Me, and
the new name of Me” – Revelation 3.12.

“The [one] overcoming [the Judgment] I will give to him to sit with Me in the throne of Me [“Heaven” –
Government is My throne – Isaiah 66.1), as I also overcame and sat down with the Father of Me in the
throne (Governments) of Him” – Revelation 3.12.

And – this agrees with Zechariah 14.9 about, “He Is one.” But until the resurrection in AD 77, God had
“divided Himself” so that the Lamb of God could come to earth in the flesh of man and die for our sins.
If God was not “divided” then, we have no forgiveness of sins. This message is repeated often in the New
Testament.
… And they will call the name of Him, ‘Emmanouel’ (Emmanouhl) which is being translated, “The God
with us’” – Matthew 1.23.

One God in heaven (Father) and one God on earth (Son) equals two Gods”; or, “One Divided God.”

The “antichrist Jews and the Beast” insist on, “one God.” But who in his right mind would listen to
them?

What is the, “one new name for the reunited God?” Do you know? Why not?
This new name is for “the [one] overcoming” -- or, “passing the Judgment.”
So then, we turn to the “Judgment chapters” and – it stands out like a sore thumb.

HERE – PAY ATTENTION NOW!

“And the Four Living Creatures (Lion = Faith, Calf = Knowledge [from plowing for Bread of Life -
Ihspoj], Man = Extreme Love [agaph], Eagle = Urgency [One Dipping = Forgiveness]), having six
wings, sit around, one by one, and within are full of eyes. And they rest not by day and by night, saying:
‘Holy, holy, holy,
Holy, holy, holy,
Holy, holy, holy,
Lord, the God, The [One] [keeping] the all power [and] time,
The [One], He was Being, and The [One] Being, and The [One] coming Himself’” – Revelation 4.8.

Note: Possibly the nine “holies” are three each for the three tenses identified, “was being, being, coming
Himself.” The Greek reads:

Kurioj, o Qeoj, o [One] [keeping] to pan krat[os] [and] wr[a] – Rev 4.8.

Isn’t that a beautiful and awesome name?

This name is recorded in Revelation 4.8, 11.17, 15.3, 16.7, 21.22 – 5 times.

A variation of this name is listed two times – Rev 16.14, 19.15. This reads

“Lord, the God, The [One [keeping the all Power [and] Hill.”

The “hill” in Revelation 16.14 was, “Mount Meggido.” [Surrendered in AD 1918.]

The “hill” in Revelation 19.15 was the “annihilation” of “Mount Zion.” [Accomplished: AD 66=73.)

Kurioj o Qeoj o [One] [keeping] to pan krat[os] [and] oroj..

“The Flat Earth People” translate these names, “Lord God Almighty” – since the murder of Galileo for
discovering that, “the sun is the center of the universe.” The Pope threaten “torture” – but Galileo had
heard of John Calvin, and the Protestants having “independence” in Switzerland. He made it there safely,
and – they burned him at the stake. And most of your Bible translation, including, banning the names of
the Gods is from that period of, “The Flat Earth People”

The “Better Bibles Blog,” and Wayne Lehman, and Irv Larsen, and Mike Sangrey, refuse to mention the
names of the Gods. They refused my post with these names, “Iesous Anointed” (Ihsouj Cristoj)
(Matthew 1.1) and “He is Gods” (myhla hwhy) (Genesis 2.4).
No man or nation or fake religion has ever won their battles against God, but these three are undaunted,
and relentless in their war against the word of God, and the names of the Gods.

For this reason, I have nicknamed them, “The Three Stooges.” They are enemies of the Living God!
3

Phony Words in the Flat Landers “alleged” Bible Translations

These fake words are in all “alleged” English Bible Translations. My oldest “alleged” Bible translation
is, “Tyndale’s New Testament,” AD 1526. However, I also have a book, “Writings of John Wycliff,” in
1380s.

Matthew 1.1 – “of Iesous Anointed” (Ihsou Cristou) corrupted to read, “of Jesus Christ” – since AD
1738, Rheims NT.

“Iesous” banned 977 times, and “Anointed” banned 490 times. [Note: No letter “J” in the Greek. And –
all these defilers of the Bible are aware of this fact. But their Atheism is undiminished.]

Matthew 5.5: “they will inherit name” of the earth (klr onom hssusi). This is corrupted to read: “they
shall inherit the earth” – NKJV.
Kleros (klhpo) = inherit, and “onom[a]” = name, and case endings for verb voice, tense, mood =
“hssusi.”
Compound words, in both Hebrew and Greek consistently lose letters, as [a] and [s] above.
Now then, how did all the “alleged” English Bible translations lose the word, “name” – since, “The Flat
Earth People?” Note look how big this word is compared to “kleros” – “onom.”
It is possible for all men to get “the right word,” when translating, but, “It is impossible for all men to get
the same wrong word,” when translating.
So then, “What were they doing if they were not translating?”
The answer is: “copying!”
[And, “The Three Stooges” (Wayne Lehman, Irv Larsen. Mike Sangrey) are extremely addicted to
“copying” and “banning the names of the Gods.”]

Matthew 5.16: “they may glorify the Father of you, The [One] in the heavens (en toij ouranouj).”
Corrupted to read: “glorify your Father in heaven” (singular). And, Poof! – the message is lost!
And – what difference does it make? All in the world!
“Father in [single] heaven” means Third Heaven, the Eternal Abode of God.
“Father in the [plural] heavens” means, “Governments – He is King of kings.”

Acts 28.4: “And when the sons of burdens saw” (de wj oi bar baroi eidon); corrupted to read “the
foreigners” – NKJV.

Note: “bar” is singular but has the plural article, “oi.” Then, “Baros” is ”burden” 4 times (#922).
And – what is the difference? “Foreigner (barbarian in KJV) means any country but your own. But, “The
sons of burden” refers specifically to the Greek Empire, and the fact that the Greeks on the peninsula paid
no taxes (burden), but the occupied territories were taxed (burdened).

Matthew 16.18: “I will build My, ‘From Calling’ (ek klhsia) – Matthew 16.18. Corrupted to read,
“church.”
Note: There is no word “church” in the Bible, but it is a corruption of a “prepositional phrase, “From (ek)
Calling (Klhsia).”
Note: The “From Calling” was resurrected in AD 77, and has nothing to do with life today. New
Jerusalem is the kingdom of God on earth (Rev 21.1-3; “with men” means “on earth.”]

John 3.8: “The Spirit breathes (To pneuma pnei) where it wishes” – John 3.3; corrupted to read: “The
wind blows where it wishes.” [Does the “wind” really have wishes?” I thought that it was directed by
God.]

Acts 8.37-38: “… Look, water: what prevents me to be dipped? (baptisqhnai). And he ordered the
chariot to stop and they both went down into the water, both the Philip and the eunuch, and he dipped
(ebaptisevn) him” – [corrupted to read: “baptized him” – to promote the Pope’s, “Infant Sprinkling.”]

In a movie about Iesous being dipped, they showed both Him and John in the Jordan River with water up
to the crotch – and John sprinkled Iesous. This was the most illogical action that anyone could imagine.
Today they teach “sprinkling” so that you will not have to get wet.

Romans 6.4: “Therefore we were buried with Him through [action] of the (tou) dipping [(dia) (action)
tou baptismatoj] into the death so that just as Anointed (Cristoj) was raised from dead through
[example] of the glory of the Father so we also should walk in newness of life.”

Note: Corrupted to read, “through baptism” – [From the Pope, and the “Dark Ages.”]

1 Peter 3.18-21: “For Anointed also once suffered for sins, righteous on behalf of unrighteous, that the
God might bring you to God, being put to death in flesh, on the one hand (men), and being made alive in
Spirit on the other hand (de), and in whom (Spirit) going, He proclaimed [goodness] of the patience of
God in the days of Noah, formerly having disobeyed was waiting, being prepared an ark into which a few,
that is eight souls were saved through water, the [thing] an antitype now also saves us, dipping
(baptisma), not the removal of filth of flesh, a good conscience, an appeal into God through resurrection
of Iesous Anointed (Ihsou Cristou).

Corrupted to read: “baptism” – NKJV.

Tradition of the Words "Preacher" and "Church"

"Simple, he believes to all of speaking, and prudent, he has understanding to blessing him" -
Prov 14.15.

1. Hebrew word #7121 [ARQ] (arq); "preach" (2 Times), and "call" (529 times), and "cry" (98
times), and "read" (44 times).
2. Hebrew word #1319 [RSB] (rsb); "preach" (2 times); and "good" (13 times), "publish" (3
times), "show" (2 times), "messenger" (1 time); and from all these the translators produced:
"bear/bring/carry good."
3. Hebrew word #6953 [TLHQ] (tl;hq); "preacher" (7 times): and #6951 [LHQ] "congregation"
(84 times).
The suffix "T" is the feminine Person Indicator. So then, "alleged preacher" is really "a feminine
congregation"; meaning, "a bride of God."
The lexicographers, such as, James Strong, had RATIONALIZED that "a feminine
congregation" means "a male preacher."
But then, when God had recorded "feminine congregation" HE MEANT "feminine
congregation."
4. Greek word #2097 [EUAGGELIZO] (euaggelizw); "preach" (49 times); "bring glad tidings"
(1 time).
(1) The prefix "EU" was translated "good” many times.
(2) AGGELIOS was translated "messenger/angel."
(3) ZO is the suffix for "present tense, active voice, indicative mood, third person, singular
person."
This is properly translated, "He brings good message"; AND NOT -- "preach"!
5. Greek word #2980 [LALEW] (lalew); "preach" (5 times); and "speak" (140 times), and "say"
(6 times), and "talk" (12 times), and "told" (10 times), and "utter" (4 times).
And so, "speak" would be the logical choice.
6. Greek word #2605 [KATAGELIO] (katageliw); "preach" (6 times); and "declare" (2 times),
and "show" (2 times), and "speak" (1 time); and "teach" (1 time). The statistics are: 6 to 6.
7. Greek word #4596 [PROKERUSSO] (pookerussw); "preach" (2 times); "before" (5 times),
This is a compound word of #4253 [PRO]; "above" and "before" (60 times); and #2784
[KERUSSO], "preach" (73 times); and "publish" (5 times); and "proclaim" (2 times) =
“publishing before.”
8. Greek word #2784 [KERUSSO] (kerussw); "preach" (73 times); "publish" (5 times),
"proclaim" (2 times).

In Inductive Logic, we consider all records of a subject, and try to harmonize them together.
Due to the fact that the "preachers" were an act of LYING in the first 6 examples; we conclude
that they were also an act LYING in the last 3 examples.

CONCLUSION: The word "preacher" does not belong in a Bible translation! Iesous Anointed
(Ihsouj Cristoj) taught, “No titles!”

Matthew 23.8-12: “But you do not be called, ‘Rabbi’ … And do not call ‘father of you’ on earth
… Neither be called, ‘teachers’ … And whoever will exalt himself will be humbled, and
whoever will humble himself will be exalted.”

THE "TRADITIONS" OF THE WORD "CHURCH."

1) Prior to the King Iames [no letter "J"] translation, "church" was rendered "congregation."
But then the mighty king was not going to stand for that, and so, he issued a "rule" against it, to
his trusted (and, threatened) translators.

2. The old ecclesiastical words to be kept; as the word church, not to be translated congregation,
etc."; from Lewis' Church History, as quoted by Alexander Campbell in his "Christian Baptist"
monthly magazine (AD 1823).

3) "Jehovah's Witnesses meeting in Kingdom Halls (not a church)."

4) "Jehovah's Witnesses have 892,537 active 'publishers' in the United States."

5) Yellow Pages for Madison and St. Clair Counties, in Illinois:

Harvest Tabernacle, and United Methodist Village, and Abundant Life Christian Center, and
Agape Family Christian Center, and Alpha & Omega Christian Fellowship, and Belleville
Christian Center, and Body of Christ Christian Center, and Bread of Life Christian Center, and
Brooklyn Christian Faith Center, and Calvary Temple, and Christian Worship Assembly, and on
and on.

PEOPLE ARE SICK OF CHURCHES! THEY ARE SEEKING RELIEF!

6) Greek lexicographers:
A) "Ek-klesia" = "a call, calling" [p.284]; "Ek" = "from, out of" [p. 168];
The Analytical Lexicon To The Greek New Testament, 1993, William D. Mounce, Zondervan
Pub., House.
B) "Klesis: 1. call, calling" [p. 435]; "Ek": 1. to denote separation ... to introduce the place from
which the separation takes place" [p. 234]; A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament,
1958, Walter Bauer, The University of Chicago Press.
C) "Greek word #2821; "Klesis"; calling, vocation"; #1537: "EK": a primary preposition,
denoting origin (the point whence motion or action proceeds): from, out (of place, time or cause
...".
But then, we possess 21 Bible translations, and only a few of them translated "Ekklesia" in
harmony with these definitions. THIS CONSTITUTES THE "TRADITIONS OF MEN."

Our nation, and churches are downright dumb!

Back to More Phony Words in “alleged” Bible Translations – from “Flat Earth People.”

1. Combined Abbreviations for Sons of Spirit. Only men of Spirit can read the Bible; 1
Cor. 2.14, Rom. 8.9, 2 Cor. 3.13-16; and others.
A) “For the invisible [things] of Him (God) from creation of world are clearly seen, the
things being understood both the eternal power of Him and [things] of the holy God (Qe
io thj), for the [making] to be them without excuse” – Romans 1.20.
(1) Qe(ou) [ag]io[u] = of holy God – Romans 1.20 – corrupted to read “godhead” and “divinity “ – a
Latin word. The word “godhead” is nonsense exposed by this verse: “the head of all man is the
Anointed (Cristoj) and the head of woman, the man, and head of Anointed, the God” – First
Corinthians 11.3.
Note: This verse exposes, as folly, “godhead” and divinity” and “deity” and “trinity.”
B) Hebrews 8.6: “But now He (Ihsouj) has obtained a more excellent service also
inasmuch as He is Mediator of a better holy covenant on better promises, He is of the
(th[s]) [covenant – diatheekes], a new (ne[ou]) law (vomo[u]) of God (Qe[ou]).”
Note: “The Flat Earth People” corrupted this string of abbreviations to read, “established”
(KJV, NKJV) found only in this verse. But, “veos, nomos, Theos, Tes, Tai,” are found a
multitude of times with our definitions. The word “covenant” (diaqhkhj), which is feminine,
was added as the object of, “thj” (which is feminine) because all the other words are
masculine. The feminine article (thj) would not apply to any of these words.
C) “was thrown into the lake of the fnire (tou puroj) and of holy God (Qeiou)” – Rev 20.10.
Note: “Qe[ou]’ and “[ag]iou” = of holy God. Both words are used extensively in the New
Testament. But, “qeiou” is only recorded 18 times as “brimstone,” in KJV and NJV and
“sulfur” in other “alleged” Bible translations. But they all missed the point that “fire” and
“God” are both symbols for “death.” Take a look at this:

“… thrones (nwsrk) (N = feminine) casting them, and Ancient of days dwelling, to clothing
of Him as white snow, and hair of head beginning (hvar) as wool, innocent throne of her
(F.) flames (F.) of fire, wheels of her blazing fire. River of fire flowing and coming from
before of her (flame) thousand thousands …” – Daniel 7.9-10.

Therefore, “God is death and fire.” And so, “holy God (in Revelation 20.10) is fire.”

So far, “the copiers of the Flat Land People had done a miserable job.” This included,
“Better Bibles Blog,” and, “The Three Stooges: Wayne Lehman and Irv Larsen and Mike
Sangrey.” What are the commandments of God about, “Judging?” Is my defense of the,
“Names of the Living God,” and the defense of the, “Living word of God” justified? We
have two commandments, “Do” and “Don’t.” You will see the difference easily.
Section One:

“Better Bibles Blog” and Wayne Lehman and Irv Larsen and Mike Sangrey were contacted to present
rebuttals to my judgments of them, but they did not reply. I am disappointed. I had hoped for a
hullabaloo of an editorial debate. They will continue to be contacted in the following sections.
4

Judging: “Do” and “Don’t”

The Living God has contrasting commandments for “one subject,” depending on the circumstances. The
“false teachers” declare “one commandment” for both “circumstances.” This is done to deny that they
should be “rebuked” for lying against God. We will examine a few of these “contrasting”
commandments.

Judge Not:: “Do not judge in order that you will not be judged. For with what judgment you judge, you
will be judged, and with what measure you measure, it will be measured to you. And why do you see the
speck the [one] in the eye of the brother you, but you do not consider the plank in the eye of you?” –
Matthew 7.1- 3.

Judge: “But beware from [teaching] of the false prophets who come to you in clothing of sheep, but
inwardly they are ravenous wolves. From [words] of the fruits of them [meaning followers of them] you
will know them. They do not gather from thorns a grape cluster or from thistles figs: - Matthew 7.15-16.

So then, in one chapter, we have two contrasting orders; judge and do not judge. The “judge not order” is
about judging personality traits. The “judge order” is about judging converts (fruits) of false prophets.
Although we do not have an abundance of false prophets today (except for the charismatic movement),
still we have a plague of false teachers.

“Better Bibles Blog” and, “The Three Stooges” have a multitude of posts declaring their contempt for,
“Literal Bible translations.” Now their condemnation is obvious, “If it is not ‘literal’ – it is not from God
but from men only.” Added to this common sense reasoning, it is condemned by the Savior of the world,
Iesous Anointed (Ihsouj Cristoj). [Why do they hate the name of the Savior of the world, the Lamb of
God? In surfing the web, “Glorifying the name of Iesous,” most all comments (excepting the crazy Jews,
who say that it is their job to obliterate the Greek names of God), their posts read like this :
A) “Iesous was ‘Latinized’ to Jesus.”
ABCDEFGHIKLMNOPQRSTVXYZ
There were no lower case letters, and K, Y and Z used only for writing words of Greek origin. The letters
J, U and W were added to the alphabet at a later stage to write languages other than Latin. J is a variant of
I, U is a variant of V, and W was introduced as a 'double-v' to make a distinction between the sounds we
know as 'v' and 'w' which was unnecessary in Latin. – from the web. And that shoots down, “latinized.”
B) “Iesous was changed to Jesus in Spanish.”
And, there was no letter “J” in Spanish either. Why all of this lying to deny the name of the Savior?
C) “Iesous” was anglicaized to read, “Jesus.” Truth, at last. This was by the Roman
Catholic Bishop of London, Richard Challoner, in AD 1738, while editing the Rhiems
New Testament. This is easily confirmed on the Internet. Tyndale’s NT, 1526, and
Matthew’s Bible, 1534, and Geneva Bible, 1599, and KJV 1611, and Rhiems NT, 1733,
all read, “Iesus.” Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, AD 405, had removed the letter “O” from
“Iesous.” Bishop Challoner has the infamy of changing the Savior’s name, “Iesous”
(Ihsouj) to, “Jesus.” Ten thousand Greek manuscripts confirm this name (Ihsouj).
Also, all Greek lexicons and Greek Interlinear Bibles, past and present, confirm the
name, “Iesous” (Ihsouj).

And – back to “judging.”

“You add not them to the ‘speaking’ (rbdh) that as I burning (hwcm) with you (mkta) and you
not subtract them from him to keeping of [words] from burnings (twcm) of ‘He Is Gods of you’ (mkyhla
hwhy) …” – Deuteronomy 4.2.
“All of sayings ‘God of her’ (hla), refiner of her, shield this, to trusting in Him” – Prov. 30.5.
“Truly, I say to you, ‘No, this generation will not pass away till ever all these [words] happen.
The Heaven (Jewish Government) and the Earth (Israel) will pass away, but the words of Me, no, they
will not have passed way” – Matthew 24.34-35.
“I testify to all hearing the words of the prophecy of this book, if anyone adds to them, the God
may add to him the plagues the [ones] having been written in this book. And if anyone takes away from
[number] of the (twn) words of the book of the prophecy, this, the God may take away the part of him
from [fruit] of the Tree of the (thj) Life and from [citizenship] of the (thj) Holy City, [blessings] of the
(twn) [ones] having been written in the book, this” – Revelation 22.18-19.

Judgment:
Adding to a Bible “translation” with added words clearly marked (as our use of brackets has done) is not
– adding to “the word of God.” These are meant as “helps” to the reader, but the “pure” text is preserved
by us. Many sentences in the Bible have “no subject.” Many others have “no verb.” The verb “is” had
been added by the translator (and, in purer times) had been identified by italic print.

Rules For Translating Hebrew, by Sid Williams:

22. A “Pair of Opposing Prepositions” (especially, a double Interior Preposition) indicates a [blank] word.
The translator, or reader, must supply the missing word. The phrase “from (M) to (L) face of us” is
meaningless, for “from” is the direct opposite of “to.” Therefore the context will supply the missing word.
“That he was done” (A) is being contrasted with “that being done” (B).
Ecclesiastes 1.10: “wn np l m”, “from (M) to (L) face (NP) of us (WN).
And we have, “that being from (#1) [evidence] to (#2) face of us” – that, “there is nothing new under the
sun.” So then, the double preposition, “from-to” is translated, “from [evidence] to face of us.”
The supplied word [evidence], or something similar, is necessary to make sense of this phrase,
(1) Example: Jeremiah 11.16: “He Is (hwhy) calling name of you Green Olive Tree, Lovely and of Good
Fruit. To noise of a great tumult, the setting fire on her, and breaking them, branches of (W) [her = tree]
of Me (God - YT) [to] Him (W) (Jacob; w yt w yld).” [Green Tree].
NOTE: The “double interior preposition” (YTW) indicated the need for a supplied word.
SUGGESTION: “and breaking them, branches of [tree] of Me [to] him (Jacob).”
(2) Example: Eze 17.3, 6-7: “'The great Eagle (Babylon) powerful of the wing, long the feather, full the
plumage ... coming to Lebanon and he took of top of the Cedar (King) of highest twig of (W; #1) […] of
Me (YT; #2) [of] him (W; #3) (w yt w qyny) ...” NOTE: “highest twig of (W) [Israel] of Me (YT) [of]
him (W).
(3) Example: Joel 3.8. And selling of Me of (TA) sons of (Y) you (mk y nb ta yt rkm w),
There is no “Double Preposition” here, and it reads good as written.

Note: The Rule of Double Prepositions also applies to the Greek text.
Revelation 21.2: “… I saw coming down from (ek) of the (tou…) heaven from (apo) of the (tou) God …”

AND – this is nonsense. That is why God has promised the Spirit.
We have “supplied” these words:

“… coming down from [place] of the heaven from [throne] of the God …”

Now you’re talking. “What do the pagan translators (banning the names of the Gods) write?
(katabainousav ek tou) – translated, “coming down out of heaven” and (tou) was ignored – before
“heaven” and before “God.” Greek English Interlinear NT and NKJV.”
“… descending from God out of heaven” – Living Oracles, 1826. The phrase “of the” (tou) ignored in
both phrases.
“… coming down from God out of heaven …” – KJV, 1611. The words, (tou) omitted twice.

Pretty bad work! All “alleged” English translations have these errors.
“… come down from God out of heaven …Tyndale’s NT, 1526. [The Flat Earth People!]
23. Even the subject of genitive phrases, and accusative phrases must sometimes be supplied. This is of
tremendous value to the reader, to learn to supply “missing words.”
Example: YNDA (ynda), “Lord of” is frequently found with no object to the preposition “of.”
The most common supplied word is “me”; giving, “Lord of [me].”

These “gaps” in the Bible sentences make the reading difficult for some, especially the “uneducated.” In
view of the dilemma, every “alleged” Bible translation (banning the names of the Gods) has “added, and
marked wotds” in the translation, but not to the “word of God.” [However, they have one and all, “taken
away many words.” The words, “gar” (for) and ”an’ (ever) and “oti” (for) are consistently ignored in the
Greek. The definite articles, “o” and “tou” and “h” are consistently ignored. If the “alleged” Bible
translators missed an opportunity to corrupt the Bible, they were probably unaware of it.

“Now the [one = Jew] being weak in the faith we receive, [but] not for disputes of reasonings. On the one
hand (men), one believes [the Greek] [he is allowed] to eat all, on the other hand (de) the one being weak
[the Jew] eats vegetables. He will not despise (exouqeneitw) the [one] eating and the [one] not eating, he
will not judge (krinetw) the [one] eating [nor] the [one] eating not, the God received him” – Romans
14.1-3.

The “alleged” Bible translators have almost all “copied” the, “Flat Earth People.” The words, “let” and
“may” – from Shakespeare, are erroneously used in the Bible over 4,000 times – from both Hebrew and
Greek verses. So then, “He will not despise and, “He will not judge” are done away with in favor of
Shakespeare.
“Let him who eats not despise him who does not eat “ – KJV.
“Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat” – NKJV.
And where is, “I (eitw) will not despose” and “He (etw) will not judge? Poof! They are gone. “He will
not” is confirmed by the William D. Mounce Analytical Lexicon. And literally hundreds of words, in
“alleged” Bible translations, do not agree with this work of his. This is because of “copying” instead of
“translating.” So then, as the words went, “Poof!” So also, the message went, “Poof!”

“Therefore from works of law not all flesh will be justified before Him, for through [knowledge] of law is
knowledge of sin” – Romans 3.20.

In Logic we have a saying, “It says what it means, nothing less, nothing more.” In English grammar, we
have “implicatons.” And, “not all flesh” is an implication that, “some flesh would be saved by law.”
Meaning the Israelites and the “converts” to Israel that would pass the Judgment by their keeping of the
law – before Iesous came; and by keeping of the law and faith of Iesous after the Lord came,.

“But now a righteousness of God apart from law has been revealed, being witnessed by the law and the
prophets (Isaiah 11.10), furthermore a righteousness of God through having (ewj) faith (pist[os]) of
Iesous Anointed (Ihsou Cristou) the [ones] believing, for not a difference” – Romans 3.20-22.

And – this is Judgment – Judgment of salvation. Paul’s letter to Rome was full of commandments of how
one congregation, with members “under the law” (and also having faith in Iesous), and members “without
law” were to be in harmony without judging one another.

“For it is necessary also heresies among you to be, in order that the approved [ones = rebukers] may
become apparent in you” – 1 Corinthians 11.19.

When I was a boy in the “thousand year” congregation, whenever the preacher would begin to lie from
the pulpit, an old maid, a pharmacist, would begin to recite a verse from the Bible proving that he was
lying. We taught that, “the woman should be silent in the body.” But the old men in the body would join
her in reciting the last half of the verse, thus, keeping her out of trouble. [Imagine being put down like
that before 300 people on Sunday morning. The lying preachers had not a chance! This sister could have
the appropriate response in a flash.]

And her purpose was to defend the children, as my purpose is in exposing, “Better Bibles Blog.”

“’One said of them, a own prophet of them, “Cretans [are] always liars, evil beasts, idle bellies.’ This
testimony is true. For which cause, rebuke them sharply in order that they may be healthy in the faith” –
Titus 1.12-13.

And so, I feel obligated to rebuke, “Better Bibles Blog” and, “The Three Stooges, Wayne Lehman and Irv
Larsen and Mike Sangrey,” for, “banning the names of the Gods.”

“But even if we or a messenger from heaven he will good message to you, [other] than the [one] we good
messaged to you, he will e accursed” – Gal. 1.8.

This message is adapted today, in our present crisis, to mean:

“If anyone comes to you to you with a fake Bible translation with different words than the Greek, he will
be accursed.”

“Better Bibles Blog,” and “Wayne Lehman and Irv Larsen and Mike Sangrey” are accursed for banning
the names of the Gods and many other words, and for condemning “literal translations.”

We will expose some of their “major blunders,” copied from, “The Flat Earth People” (who practiced
murder).

Correct: “into the Anointed Iesous” (eij ton Criston Ihsoun) – Acts 19.4.

The declension of “Iesous” is:

Ihsouj Ihsou Ihsw Ihsoun = Nominative, Genitive, Dative, Accusative = Mounce, n-2a, page 6.

So then, anyone who had read 6 pages of Mounce’s book should know these facts. Anyone without these
facts is unqualified to translate. But then, Mr. Mounce also “pitches curveballs.”
Page 10 reads, n-3g[1] – Ihsouj Ihsou Ihsou* Ihsouv.

“… of the redermption in anointed of Iesous. En cristw Ihsou = in anointed [Body] of Iesous.”

So then, in Greek you cannot have two case endings (w ou) in one phrase referring to one person or thing.
Mr. Mounce recorded both (w ou) equaled Dative case (w).
Why did he do that? The answer is right here at my computer.
“… that is on Christ Jesus ….” – Tyndale’s NT, Acts 19.4.

And what did the Savior of the world say about the, “traditions of men?”

“But The [One – Son of God – verse 14.33] answering said, ‘On account of whom you also do transgress
the commandment of the God on account of the tradition of you?’ - Matthew 15.3.
But then, Mr. Tyndale and Mr. Mounce preferred the “traditions of the Flat Earth People” to the “first
week” principles of, “Introduction to Biblical Greek” – meaning, the “case endings.” It is with severe
gloom that I inform you that “all alleged” lexicographers prefer copying to translating – otherwise they
would not all ban “the names of the Gods.”

This error (Acts 19.4) was confirmed, and reported, to be 53 times in all “alleged” Bible translations.
I was hoping the message would be received with joy, but instead I received a stinging rebuke. [What
does it take to make a fellow “happy.”]

Personal e-mail from Mike Sangrey:

Translating ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ as "en Christ Jesus" is a perfectly valid way of translating the phrase. One
can argue for better ways of translating it, but to state that it's mistranslated because the translators did not
understand case endings (assuming you're actually serious) is preposterous. The genitive and dative (as
well as the vocative) of the name Ἰησοῦς is Ἰησοῦ. They ALL end in OU. So, there is no problem. This
is not all that unusual since names frequently have "odd" declensions. The Greek for Jesus actually
comes from the Latin which might explain why it has the declension it does. Bible translators do not
misunderstand case endings. You do. Again, this is relatively basic Greek.

Referring to the many standard Bible translations as "alleged" or "pagan" won't be allowed on BBB.
You won't have a platform on BBB to air such statements.

You wrote: "I believe that no one can remember all the Greek voices, and tenses, and moods".

I know of a man, when speaking at a conference, code-shifted. That means he was speaking in English,
then quoted some Greek, and then proceeded to continue with his presentation to the end--IN GREEK.
He is so fluent in the language he did not know he was doing it. A close friend of mine did nearly the
same thing, but it was in Hebrew. There are MANY who not only can remember, but teach and use
Greek on a daily basis.

Obviously, you have very little understanding of Greek.

Frankly, that is perfectly fine. Most people fall into this category. The issue is your attitude that Bible
translators have less ability than you do. Your comments show a very obvious lack of knowledge. As
I've suggested before, you need to step back. You need to learn from others who know more than you do.

If you are honestly sincere about wishing to understand the Greek, then please forget what you think you
know and go take an entry level Greek class.

Well, I hope my comments here move you in the right direction. I won't be this informative in the future.

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Sidney <sidlee@charter.net> wrote:

>
> Thank you for your advice.
>
> In World History, in the eighth grade, we had a wonderful text book. Words were listed according to
the Pope’s preference with the opinion of “purists” following in parentheses. One of these words was,
“Hadrian” (Adrian). Another was the Pope’s date for “Darius II,” [(522 BC) (520 BC)]. And on and on it
went. “Without” (prefix A) “ships” is supported by a couple of other uses of “without” (prefix A) which
I cannot call to mind, and it would require tremendous research, which I have not the time for at the
moment.
>
> But I greatly appreciate your advice, and hope that we many become friends.
>
> Your repeated comment that, “You do not understand the blog” is a false statement. I perfectly
understand, but disagree.
>
> Even the most accurate work in the history of the world can benefit from criticism, and self-
examination.
>
> I will re-post my opinion with more evidence.
>
> Thank you for your advice.

Reply: Sid Williams

Note: “Ain’t that great!”

In essence “Dark Ages Mike” tells me if I shut up and listen, he will teach me.

Quote Mike <If you are honestly sincere about wishing to understand the Greek, then please forget what
you think you know and go take an entry level Greek class> Quote Mike.

And, what does the entry level Greek class teach? It teaches case endings and prepositions, and names of
the Gods – with reasons to “despise” them.

This is a lead in to our next topic “Exposing Ihsou is not Dative Case”:

“Mike” must be a mind-reader, that is where I was headed anyway. So then, “Extreme Folly Exposed.”

We will only survey all of Matthew, for the rest of the New Testament follows the same pattern, except
the phrase (53 times), en cristw Ihsou – meaning, “in anointed [Body] of Iesous,” but rendered by
Tyndale, in AD 1526, and everyone since (except me) to read, “Christ Jesus.” But we have exposed that
nonsense before, that the case endings, “w ou” cannot refer to one person.

“For the natural man [Mike] seeks not the [things] of the Spirit of the God, for they are foolishness to
him, nor can he [Mike] know, for they are spiritually discerned” – First Corinthians 2.14; and others.

This pinpoints the difference between Mike and Sid.

1. Matthew 8.34: “… all the city came into a meeting* in the (tw) [presence] of Iesous (Ihsou)*.”
Note: And, the Dative stays Dative (tw) and the Genitive stays Genitive (ou), and we change nothing.
2. Matthew 9.10-11; “And it happened of Him (autou) reclining [to eat] in the (en th) house
(feminine), and look many tax collectors … reclining in the (tw) [house - feminine] of Iesous
(Ihsou).” Note: The Dative (w) remained Dative (w) and the Genitive stayed Genitive (ou).
3. Matthew 9.18, -27: “… worshipping to Him (autw) … into the house (eij thn oikian) … And
passing from there to the (tw) [house] of Iesous (Ihsou).” AND – The Dative (w) stayed Dative,
and the Genitive (ou) stayed Genitive. [And, we did not need to copy, “The flat Earth People.”]
 4. Matthew 14.10, 12: “… beheaded the John in the prison* … and coming they reported in the (tw)
[prison message] of Iesous (Ihsou).” Note: No changing of Dative or Genitive. The word of God
is good.
5. Matthew 14.35-15.1: “… they brought to Him (autw) all … Then came to the (tw) [all] of
Iesous …” Note: No changes of Dative or Genitive as, “The Flat Earth People” had done.
6. Matthew 17.1-4: “… Rock* (Peter) and Iames* (James) and Iooanes* (John) … And, look,
Moses and Elijah appeared to them with Him (autou) talking together. And the Rock answering
said in the (tw)* [students] of Iesous (Ihsou) …” And – Dative is Dative (tw) and Genitive is
Genitive (ou).
7. Matthew 17.18-20: “And Iesous rebuked in him (autw) the demon and the boy was healed from
[time] of the hour (thj wraj) … The students of Iesous (Ihsou) approaching in the (tw) [time of
the hour] …” Note: God needs not any help from, “The Flat Earth People” and their teaching
that, “Genitive Iesous should be taught to be Dative Iesous.”
8. Matthew 17.24-18.1: “… approached the [ones] the double dracma receiving in the Rock (tw
Petrw) … In that hour the students of Iesous (Ihsou) approached in the (tw) [taxing] saying …”
Again, we need not any help from, “The Flat Earth People.” This one was extremely ignorant,
not recognizing, “the students of Iesous.”
Tyndale’s NT, 1526: “The fame tyme the disciples cam unto Iefus …”
Here the Dark Ages writer did not blaspheme the name of the Savior of the world, “Iejus” as
severely as it is blasphemed today. But he ignored, “in the” (tw). Note: The letter appearing to
be an “f” was the middle form of, “S” in English at that time.
NLT, AD 2008: “About that time (tw) the disciples came to Jesus [of Iesous (Ihsou)] …”
ESV, AD 2008: “At that time (tw) the disciples came to Jesus [of Iesous (Ihsou)] …”

Then (AD 1526) or now (AD 2008) the translators are fools. They do not understand the lessons
of, “The First Week of Introduction to Biblical Greek.”
“The case endings and the personal pronouns (which they also consistently get wrong [as “it”
(auto) for “her” (auth)], and the alphabet (which they ignore [as “Jesus” for “Iesous”]) are the
three foundations of Greek Bible translation.
“They do not know the A, B, Cs,”
These examples seem to prove that, “corrupting genitive Iesous to read dative Iesous” is limited
to the Bible Colleges and their “boy” prisoners. But sad to tell, when the “boy” prisoners
graduate, they are unable to “think” for the rest of their lives.

9. Matthew 21.24, 27: “And the Iesous answering, said to them, ‘And I will continuously
(subjunctive mood) ask you one word* … And answering in the (tw) [one word] of Iesous
(Ihsou) they said …” [This verse really condemns the, “change case endings” religion – of, “The
Flat Earth People.”]
Note: No need to corrupt the text, and deny beginner’s Greek, for the message is clear.
ESV, AD 2008: “So they answered Jesus …” Note: “In the” (tw) ignored.
NLT, AD 2008: “So they finally replied …” Note: “Ahh!” They even banned the name of Iesous
with, “in the” (tw).
10. Matthew 26.13, 17: “… where ever this good (eu) message (aggelion) is proclaimed in the world
(tw kosmw) will be spoken also the [work] she (auth)* did into a memory of her (authj) … And
the first [day] of the [ones] (twn) of Unleavened Bread, the students approached in the (tw)
[world] of Iesous (Ihsou) ...” Note: Dative is Dative (w) and Genitive is Genitive (ou).
 11. Matthew 26.48-49: “And the [one] handing Him over gave them a sign, saying, ‘Whomever I will
kiss, He is the one … And immediately, coming to [place] in the (tw) [kissing] of Iesous (Ihsou)
…”

12. Matthew 27.50-55: “And the Iesous (Ihsouj) crying out in a great voice let go the Spirit … And
there were many women there … observing from a distance, who followed in the (tw) [death] of
Iesous (Ihsou) …”

13. Matthew 27.57: “… came a rich man from Arimathea … who also himself became a student in
the (tw) [death] of Iesous (Ihsou) …” And – Dative is Dative (tw) and Genitive is Genitive
(Ihsou). And – Mr, William D. Mounce was dead wrong.

Conclision: The Genitive phrase, “of Iesous” (Ihsou) was never intended to be a Dative phrase, “in
Iesous” (Ihsw). Is this word in the Bible?
Summary: “God” (Qeoj) is Dative – Revelation 1.6: “priest to the God” (tw Qew)
“Lord” (Kurioj) is Dative – Phillemon 16: “in the Lord” (en Kuriw).
“Anointed” (Cristoj) is Dative: 2 Corinthians 3.14, “for in Anointed (en Cristw) she passed away
(Old Testament).” See: Ephesians 5.10-11, 13.
“Iesous” (Ihsouj) is not in the Dative case – directly. However, the Son (Uiojv) is in the Bible as Dative:
en tw aklhqinw en tw Uiw autou Ihsou Cristw; now isn’t that a pretty mess?

Mike Sangrey reported he knew a man who could read the Greek. I would love to hear him attempt to
read that line. I cannot even, after much study, translate this clause with much certainty. It begins, “in”
(en) – but “in what” is a mystery. Then follows, “in the” (tw) “Son” (Uiw) “of him” (autou) “of Iesous
(Ihsou) “in Anointed” (Cristw) – First John 5.20.

What did, “The Flat Earth People” conclude? Tyndale took the wisest course – he ignored First John.

“And we know that the Son of God has come, and he has given us understanding so that we can know the
true God. And now we live in fellowship with the true God because we live in fellowship with his Son,
Jesus Christ. He is the only true God, and he is eternal life – First John 5.20 - NLT.

Notes: Here, “fellowship” (2 times) replaced, “in in the” (en tw). That is interesting. So my curiosity
was peaked. But they had a note on verse 5.20 and never said a word about this “gem.”

“And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him
who is true; and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life” –
Frist John 5.20 – ESV.

Notes: Here, we have no “fellowship,” and so “in in the” (en tw), two times, was ignored. Their notes
were not helpful.

“And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us understanding, that we may know him that
is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life” – KJV.

Notes: I have pondered this verse many times and never had the sense to refer to the Greek, and so, never
grasped the message. Sometimes excessive Greek words may be ignored, but very seldom. One example
that jumps to mind is this: “the man this” is translated merely as, “this man.” And I can see no loss of the
message with this habit. But this is very rare.
So then, “case endings” (which Mike Sangrey had said are unnecessary for translation) will connect the
“prepositions” (in [en], and in the [tw]) or “the article” to the proper noun (Son, God, Iesous, Anointed).

Ev – in – [A - followed by a noun when followed by the preposition; “of”; [kingdom] – of Iesous

(Ihsou).
Tw - In the – true (alhqinw) [(w) preposition followed by (w) noun.
En – [A = category; kingdom] [En auto (en auto) – in Himself.]
Tw – In the Son Anointed (tw Uiw Cristw)

“5.19-20: “We know that we are from [A] [kingdom] of the God and the whole world lies in [tribulation]
in the evil. And we know that the Son of the God has come and has given us understanding that we might
know the true (alhqinon - Neuter), and we are in [kingdom] of Iesous in the True (alhqinw - Dative)
[Doube, “In, In The” (en tw)], in (evn) [kingdom] of Him (autou), in the (tw Uiw) Son Anointed. This
One (alnqinoj) (nom., sg., masc. ) is the true (alhqinoj) God and the life (zwn) eternal.”

Note: But, whether true or whether false, our attempted translation does not “remove” all the prepositions
“removed” by the “copiers” of “alleged” Bible translations.

“The Iesous says to him,’I Am the Way and the Truth (h alhqia) and the Life (zwvn). No one comes to
the Father if not, through Me” – John 14.6.

John also identified, “Out of the True,” and it is just the opposite of this.

“… and every spirit [of prophecy], the [one] [that] does not confess Iesous Anointed having come in
flesh, from [throne] of the God is not [from (throne) of the God – verse 2]. And this is the [spirit] of the
AntiAnointed [Antichrist], which you have heard is coming, and is now [Jews – and later Muslims] in*
[kingdom of Iesous], in the* world already” – First John 4.3. Note *: Double, “In, In The” (en tw).

Section Two:
A copy has been sent to, “Better Bibles Blog” and, “The Three Stooges: Wayne Lehman and Irv Larsen
and Mike Sangrey” inviting them to present a rebuttal of my charges against them. My readers are also
invited to reply or comment. Limit remarks to 4 pages, 8.5” times 11” – with a one inch margin, single-
spaced, and in Times New Romans, 11 point – with a minimum of bold print. Your comments may be
too large for the comment box on www.scribd.com
In such a case send me a direct e-mail: sidlee@charter.net

God has promised relief from this universal denying of the names of the Gods. “Revival 2015” will
thoroughly “expose the Pope” (Rev. 20.9b-10), and as in AD 1870 (Rev. 19.20), spiritual revival will
follow. Some of you will be “saved,” and of those “saved,” some will “possess” the Seven Spirits of
God.

“To God be the glory, great things He has done.”

And, if this translation is better than the others, it is due to immense faith in God, and humble prayer to
God, believing that He would guide my work.
6

Using Bible Alphabets

What does the reader think? Should “alleged teachers” invent their private alphabets?

Hebrew: a bgdwhzxjyklmns[pcqrvt = 22 letters.

The letter a is a consonant in Hebrew – usually limited in use to the first or final letter of a word – and
NO vowels.

Strong’s Concordance, 1895, added – PH SH TH = 25 letters in alphabet list.

Strong’s Lexicon added, “vowel ‘a’” -- AD[a]M = man.
Added, “vowel ‘E’”- (hyla) – [E]l[i]y[a]h (#452).
Added, “vowel, ‘I’” (Ehyla) – [E]l[i]y[a]h.
Added, “vowel, ‘O’” (rbd) – D[o]b[e]r (#1696).
Added, “vowel ‘U’” – ([wvwhy) - … from 3069 [hwhy] and 3467 [[vy]; [j][e]h[o]s[h][u]a.
Note: Here are five removals and replacements in one “seven letter” word. And – this is the, “Hebrew
Origin” of the Greek name, “Ihsouj” (Iesous) – “the Savior of the world.”

These five vowels were added to Strong’s Hebrew Lexicon, corrupting literally hundreds of Bible words.

Mr. James Strong was a dedicated man, working most of his life to compile this concordance. At one
time, he got sick, and had to lay off his work. But he came back after his illness, and resumed his work.
It is reported that he had 100 contributors to his project. But his goal was wrong. He stated that he
wanted to list every word in the King James Version. These authors said, “We will not be bound by
words and syllables.” And they compiled a royal mess with 68 definitions for Hebrew word #7725 (bwv).

Why then, with such shoddy work, did he achieve such fame and respect?
The answer is: “Everybody else was doing the same thing.”

Robert Young’s, “Literal Translation of the Holy Bible,” 1862 had all of these “Jewish Vowels” in it.
Geneva Bible, 1599, had most of these “Jewish Vowels” in it – “Habel” for, “the mourning (blh), and,
“the Lord God” for, “He Is Gods” (myhla hwhy).

Even today, NLT and ESV, published in AD 2008, have most of these “Jewish Vowels.”
But then, (I hate to beat a dead dog) – Hebrew has no vowels. Anyone believing in “Jewish Vowels” –
knows not the Hebrew names of God.

But the, the Lamb of God came to enlighten man, and to expose the, AntiAnointed (Antichrist – Jews and
Muslims) and to teach, “The new name of the God and of the Iesous.” See: Zech. 14.9, 1 Cor. 15.28,
Rev. 3.12, Rev. 4.8, and others. Did the Lord succeed? You know that our Lord never fails. This
success is recorded:

“And the Woman (New Covenant) fled into the wilderness where she has there a place having been
prepared on [counsel] of the God, so that there they may nourish her a thousand, two hundred –sixty
days/years” – Rev 12.6.

The Pope was seeking the servants of God to kill them, but God concealed them. We have no writings
from them, for had they written they would have been burned at the stake.” 42 Months = AD 600-1860.
This was described again in Zechariah.

“And ‘He Is’ (hwhy) coming, and He will fight in nations, the-those, as day the fighting them in days of
battle. And, they will stand, feet of Him in days, the-that, on Mount the Olives [represents captivity as
Iesous was led there in captivity] that to face of Jerusalem from east. And, Mount of Olives, he will be
split from two of him from east and west [Papal Kingdom in Europe divided], he will move a very great
valley, he will move half of the Mountain (Kingdom) north of her [Rome – meaning Protestants] and half
of him (kingdom) to south [Papal dominated kingdoms of Europe]. And fleeing them [to] valley of the
Mountain [Papal Rome after the split] for he will extend valley of Mountains of [Me = God], you will flee
to near (lca) as that you fled from face of the earthquake in days of Uzziah king of Judah.
[2 Chr. 25.22, “And Judah was put to the worse before Israel, and they fled every man to his tent.” This
described defeat of Amaziah, father of Uzziiah, and so, the “earthquake” (humiliation and defeat of a
nation) was in “the days of Uzziah” when “Judah fled.”)

“And being in days the-this, he will not be light (hyhy), precious [ones], [or] dark ones [Protestant
Reformation Movement = semi-light]. And being one day, this, they will come “living waters” (Holy
Spirit – Rev. 14.6-8 = Millennum and Fall of Babylon – AD 1870) from [New] Jerusalem, half of them to
the eastern sea and half of them to the western sea in summer and in winter he will be” – Zechariah 14.3-
8.

This “semi-light” is recorded in a more condemning way in the book of Joel.

“3.19. Egypt [West] shall be a desolation and Edom [East] shall be a desolate wilderness, because of the
violence against the children of Judah, when they shed innocent blood in their earth. [Refers to Papal
Rome & Constantinople.]
3.30. And Judah shall dwell to the age, and Jerusalem through generation and generation.
3.21. And I will make innocent their blood-guilt [Protestants, who had Inquisitions, ushered in
Millennium] that I have not made innocent; for “He Is” dwells in Zion.

What this means, in my opinion, is that “Egypt” is “Papal Rome” and “Constantinople” [until captured by
the Muslims in AD 1453] was the “Eastern Catholic Church.” Then, “Judah dwell to ever, and [New]
Jerusalem from generation to generation means that the, “Thousand year reign” is to the End of Time.”
[This means that it is with us “today” (AD 2011). This was also recorded in Daniel.]

Daniel 7.25: “… The holy ones will be handed over to him (Pope) for a time (year), times (two years),
and half a time.” Prophecy has “a year for a day” – after equating each day with 360 days. This was the
42 Months: AD 600-1860. Remember, “the saved” were “in the valley” during this period – meaning,
between the Papal Mountain and the Protestant Mountain.

“And I will make innocent their blood-guilt [Protestants, who had Inquisitions, and joined in Millennium
were forgiven] that I have not made innocent; for ‘He Is’ (hwhy) dwells in Zion.”
This seems to evidently mean that members of “churches” founded on murder were ones of “blood-guilt.”
Most church members are unaware that their denomination was founded on “murder.”
Lutherans were founded on the murder in suppressing the “Peasants Revolt.”
“Anglicans” and “Presbyterians” were founded on “murder” during the Civil War in England.
“Puritans” were guilty of the “Salem Witch Hunts.”
“Mormons” were indicted for “murder” and “thievery” in Missouri in the early 1800s.
[This is recorded in, “The Millennial Harbinger” monthly magazine published by Alexander Campbell.]

“But he that hates his brother is in darkness, and walks in darkness, and knows not where he goes for that
darkness has blinded his eyes” – First John 2.11.

And in the past, more than in the promiscuous present day, denominationalism promoted much hatred.
Today the deceiver’s are pushing, “religious tolerance” – to the point that they believe in nothing.

John (or, God) did not want you to miss this point:
“Whosoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life remaining in
him” – First John 3.15.
Now then, the workers of Satan labor hard to convince you that, “This does not mean a spiritual brother,
but all Atheists and heretics.”

The story of, “fleeing to the valley” [between Protestants and Catholics in the 42 Months] is also
described during, “The Thousand Year Reign.”

“And they [Satan, Gog, Magog, The Devil that Deceived them] went on the breath of the Earth [New J] is
also described during, “The Thousand Year Reign.”

“And they [Satan, Gog, Magog, The Devil that Deceived them] went on the breath of the Earth [New
Jerusalem] and surrounded the camp of the holy ones, and the city, the Extremely Loved (agaph)” – Rev
20.9a.

We have fled to the valley from Catholicism, Protestantism, Judaism, and Ecumenical Movement. We
have been in prison most of my life [through extreme censorship] – this was, “Satan Loosed A Little”
[Rev 20.3] (Second Dark Ages: AD 1959-2004).

You have been in prison most of your lives – but you were not, “in the valley.”

The Greek Alphabet:

a b g d e z h q I k l m n x o p r s t u f c y w.

Added letters: H – capital, “Eta” (E) translated as, “H.”

“A” translated as, “HA.” Example: Adrian – translated as, “Hadrian.” The “doctors of darkness” claim
that they know how to pronounce words with Greek pronunciation “marks” – from the First Century.
This is referred to in the Bible as, “gnwsij” = “seemingly.”
But if the letter, “a” is pronounced as “ha” – then when they add a second letter, “h” in the translation,
they would lose the first pronunciation. They would have, “h” plus “ha” which is nonsense.
“Eta” (H h) is the Greek “long ‘e’” – pronounced in English as, “ee” sounding as “teen and seen.”
Example: “secrete” (si-kret) – pronounced as “i.” And, “secede” (si-sed) – pronounced as “i.”
And there is no need for the letter “h” to pronounce the long “e.”
Example: “Hrwdhj”, pronounced, “Iroodis.” And adding the letter, “h” is cheating.
Example: “Hsau”, Esau (#2269), pronounced, “Isaw.”
Example: “Hr” (#2262), pronounced, “Ir.”
Example: “aplouj” (#573), promounced, “without” (a) “ship” (#4143; ploion – 67 times.)
Mark 4.37: “… the waves beat into the ship …”
Acts 27.14: “And not much after a wind rushed down of her (ship, her: authj) like a whirlwind the [one]
being called, ‘Eurooklydoon’.”
Mark 6.47: “… the ship was in the midst of the sea …”
Matthew 8.24: … the ship was covered with the waves …”

Summary: The “eye without ship” would be “without” plunging stem to stern and listing port to
starboard. In other words, this “eye without ship” would be steadier than an “eye on ship.”
The word, “single” instead of “without ship” is only found four times, always referring to the “eye”
guiding Israel.
Ephesians 3.17: “The Anointed to dwell in the hearts of you though [confidence] of the faith, having been
rooted and having been founded in Extreme Love (agaph).”
Colossians: 1.23: “If indeed, you continue in the faith, having been founded and firm and not drifting
away [ships] from [salvation] of the hope of the good message which you heard, of the [one] being
proclaimed in all the Creation [Heaven and Earth = Israel], the [one] under the Heaven (Government)
of which I Paul became a servant.”

“Epsilon” (E e) is the short “e” in Greek.

“I” (Iesous) changed to “J” (Jesus).

The historians had described the “Dark Ages” as, “Continental Retardation in Europe.” [The Pope was
the “Father of Darkness.”]
Again, the “Dark Ages” was described as men “incapable of original thought” – as our “alleged” Bible
translators.
But your generation will “break the mold!”
You will be “capable of original thought!”
Nothing is holy to these, “Flat Earth People.”
You can do better!