Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
B E T W E E N:
ELIZABETH MAY
Applicant
and
TO THE RESPONDENT:
THIS APPLICATION will be heard by the Court at a time and place to be fixed
by the Judicial Administrator. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the place of hearing
will be as requested by the applicant. The applicant requests that this application be heard
at Toronto, Ontario.
Copies of the Federal Courts Rules information concerning the local offices of the Court
and other necessary information may be obtained on request to the Administrator of this
Court at Ottawa (telephone 613-992-4238) or at any local office.
1
IF YOU FAIL TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION, JUDGMENT MAY BE
GIVEN IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU.
Issued by:_____________________________________
(Registry Officer)
TO:
CBC/Radio-Canada
250 Front St. West
Toronto ON
M5V 3G5
2
APPLICATION
This is an application for judicial review in respect of the portion of the Canadian Radio-
CRTC 2011-218 (March 29, 2011) that concerns the broadcasting of debates.
(a) Allowance of short service of all documents and materials in light of the urgency
of the application;
(b)An order in the nature of mandamus that electoral fairness within the meaning of
Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires that the
election periods; that those guidelines must include explicit criteria for
participation that are made public and must allow participation of all leaders of
registered political parties which received at least two percent of the vote in the
most recent previous election; and that such guidelines must be issued prior to
the first leaders’ debate in respect of the 2011 federal election which is scheduled
(c) Such other remedies as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court may
permit.
3
CRTC 2011-218;
(b) With respect to debates, the Information Bulletin states that broadcasters are not
(c) From September 2, 1988 until March 15, 1995, the CRTC required that
broadcasters accommodate all rival political parties in any leaders’ debates that
they broadcast;
(d) On March 15, 1995, the CRTC issued a public notice stating that the Commission
(e) From March 15, 1995 to the present, the CRTC has not issued any guidelines
leaders’ debates;
(f) The Applicant, Elizabeth May [hereinafter “Ms. May”], is the leader of the Green
Party of Canada;
(g) The Green Party of Canada is a registered political party pursuant to the Canada
Elections Act;
(j) The Consortium producing the leaders’ debates programs for the federal election
(k) The Consortium of broadcasters has invited the leaders of the Conservative Party
of Canada, the Liberal Party of Canada, the New Democratic Party of Canada and
the Bloc Quebecois to participate in the leaders’ debates during the election period
4
for the election of 2011, and has stated that no other leaders will be permitted to
participate;
(l) The first leaders’ debate is scheduled is scheduled for April 12, 2011;
(m) The choices that the Consortium makes for participation in the leaders’ debates
are arbitrary and capricious and are not based on any rational criteria;
(n) Ms. May was also the leader of the Green Party of Canada for the election of
2008;
(o) In 2008, the Consortium initially told Ms. May that she would not be permitted to
participate in the leaders’ debates. After a huge public outcry and the threat of
legal action, the Consortium reversed its position and allowed Ms. May to
(p) It was widely recognised that Ms. May made important contributions to the
(q) The Green Party of Canada received 6.8% of the vote in the most recent federal
(r) The combined votes for all the other registered political parties in the election of
2008 other than those invited to participate in the present leaders’ debate and the
(s) It is the consensus of academic specialists on the subject that the televised leaders’
debates are the most important events in the Canadian election campaign. No
other campaign event comes close to the leaders’ debates in gaining a high level
of voter interest;
(t) Participation in the leaders’ debates legitimises the participants; exclusion from
5
the debates tends to relegate non-participants to the fringes of the campaign;
(u) It distorts the electoral process to allow the Consortium to decide on an arbitrary
basis who will participate in leaders’ debates. To ensure the fairness in elections
principled basis;
(v) Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires an equitable
extremely difficult to give equitable coverage to a political party whose leader did
not participate;
(x) It is extremely likely that the number of votes that Green Party candidates receive
(y) Each federally registered political party that gets 2% or more of the national vote
receives $1.75 per vote, indexed to inflation. Therefore, the number of votes a
(cc) Section 28 of the Federal Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7; and
(dd) Such other grounds as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court may permit.
6
(a) The Affidavit of Elizabeth May and exhibits thereto, to be filed;
(e) Such other documents as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court may
permit.
____________________________________
Reni Chang
Tel: 416-657-1465
Fax: 416-657-1511