GROWTH OF MUSLIM POPULATIO
; IN '
MEDIEVAL INDIA
A.B, 1060 —1800}
K. S. LAL
Professor of History
Aeivershty of Jodhper
RESEARCH : DELHIBy the sane anther
History of the Khslis
‘Twillghe of the Suftanate
Stuslim State in Indte
Studies in Mediovat Indien History
Stadies in Asien History (Ed.)
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, 1873
Rs 40.00
: PRINTED 18 1HOtA
tes, 2/46, Ansari Road, Daryagan
Pediished by RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS in Sotial St
eer, Shabdera, Delhi-32.
Delbi-§ and printed at RP. P/E, 1826-8, West Pohtas WPREFACE
Wit influence of medieval Indian Muslims on Indian sncial order
Fo 6 was active and palpable. And yet its dimension was not the
vSatte all through the medieval gge rengimg. sav, bermeen A.D.
1000 and 1860. In the beginning Muslims were feo in pumbers,
indeed very few. Obsiously the quantum ef their smpact at that
Stage could have been only limeed. Tt grew ax the numbers
grew.
On the other hand, “while ‘te “pykarahee of Muslims im
Inder gave the Hindu civilisation a big jolt. its influence on Indian
socicly conuaned to yemain ever strong. In any society people
have to coenist, ideas are exchanged, and different sections of
people influence one another's life and theaght. So happened in
medieval India too Mere the Muslims and Hindus clashed and
eiexisted ; their mutual relations patsed through stresses and
strains; but they also influenced cock other in social and cultural
spheres, Side by side. all thransh the centuries of the Middle Ages
the Muslim numbers went on rising. Increase in population is not
merely a growth im numbers and. as W.E Moore points ont, at
changes not ently “the size of social ystems....but also the com-
plewuy and intesmlapansbip. or organizational forms within systems,
usually with accompanying strains”,
These seus led me to the conchusion that in any stindy of
meheval fosiory and society ont one task should be to try to
entimate how many Muslims gad mote Musthns there ser and 10
determine the propertion of Muslims in die overall populabor of
India. ‘Then the poture of Ahustins fiveng and working with) the
majority of nonm-Musiims wauld become cil more clear, For. “one
fect is patentis clear, “fhe vast psajorty of Muslims jn India fand
Pakistan? ere comvert® from indigenous elements, and the ‘two nation
theory” Has oo Histerical boss
Populitiea stinnes of ptecensns times are feng sucess fally
ailerapied ip umeoy westera comttties, bet in Indig not much work
bas been done un tins area. This beok is ufmost a inaition attempt
Bi popslgtion study ey the meeval neriod. 1 need hurdiy be said
“Sbat ie squeere afurnatin onthe deagn and size of population(vi)
in medieval times from centemporary sources has been an uphill
task. Besides, any study of population of pre-census times can bs
based only on estimates and estimates by their very nature tend
to be tentative, In our computation, however, sufficient historical
evidence tas been forthcoming for any demographic behaviour. If
nothing more, Ihave at least been able to collect in one place
direct and indirect evidence leading to fairly good estimates of
medieval Indian population, although the estimates themselves may
not always be invulnerable to challenge. However I hope that the
uniqueness, magnitude and delicacy of the task would make the
reader indulgent and the crilic tolerant. .
In this study I have found it fruitful to divide the eight cen-
turies of the medieval period into four parts of two centuries cach, ,
and study the overall population as well as the growth of
Muslim numbers separately for the periods A.D. 1000 to 1200,
1200 to 1400, 1400 to 1600, and 1600 to 1800, These bench-marks
are not as arbitrary or unscientific as they look. The year 1000
saw the introduction of Muslims in the cis-Indus region consequent
upon the invarious from Ghazni. 1200 witnessed the establishment of
Turkish rule and 1400 its decline. Akbaz’s Age came to a close by
about 1600. The two last centuries witnessed the peak of glory and
the nadir of decline of Muslim power in Ini
A number of friends, belonging to the University of Delhi where.
this study was carried out, helped and encouraged me in completing’
the work. Professor Donald F.Lach of the University of Chicago
and a Visiting Professor in the Department of History, Delhi Uni-
versity, during the year 1967-68, gave me some Demographic
Tables of European cities prepared for his own use. Dr. Ashish
Bose, Professor of Demography in the Institute of Economic Growth,
went through the first draft of the book, lent ready advice on many
points, and helped me in preparing Tables and Diagrams. Dr. Suren
Navalakha of the Asian Research Centre placed at my disposal
some very valuable material on the growth of Muslim population
in Bengal, Dr. Feroz Ahmad of the Physics Department ungrudg-
ingly carried out for me some calculations on the electronic com-
puter, and Dr. H. C. Varma was hind enough to prepare the Index.
To all these and many others not mentioned here I owe a debt of
“gratitude.
K.S. Lal“CONTENTS
~ Part t
The Data
Gouiree « Materials, and Limitations of. Demographic
Data cs
!SOme Methodological Problems of Estimating. Ropu:
Jation i
Port 2
Total Population of Medieval India
“HL. Total Population—Pre-1000 position ee
cA, DB, 10n0- {206
WALD. 1600-1800 4
Part 3 a
ron of Muslin Poputation in Medieval, India
mie-Pre-i 600 Position
“OS. AUB. ya00-1c00
HS ALD. 1600-1800
Pare at
Components of Growth of Mustim Foputation, in
Medieval India
fim Population 8
NTU Cempatic
< Bengal ABPAERE EF
Bkeo Fhea dee.SOURCE MATERIALS AND UMITATIONS OF
DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
The most imporidat source materials for the study of medieval
Indian demography, as for the crady ef any other aspect of medeval
bistury, mainly comprise contemporary Arabic and Persian georaphi-
val and historical works. Of no less consequence are the accounts of
forsign itinerants, ccpeeially Rurepean. Many modern works also help
is eatunating the population of medieval times. These fall into three
catngories, The first ser consists of those written in the pre-cemus
yor, and attempting population estemates of past cemtaries, Actiral
senses reparts front TRS) onwards fort the second set. Lastly, there
are the writings of