Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 9

→ ESa’S Gravity MiSSiOn

goce newsletter

Issue 2 | March 2011

In this issue:
Foreword
GOCE Mission Accomplished!
GOCE Mission Status March 2011
Release of the second generation GOCE gravity
field solutions
The GOCE gravity field solutions: DIR, TIM and SPW
• Improvements on the geoid model from the
new solutions
Pubblications
How to obtain GOCE Data
• Available datasets
• Data Access
GOCE satellite Processing GOCE Data
launched on 17 March 2009 • L1b and Level 2 product readers
• The GUT Software suite
Staying up-to-date: the GOCE Portal
Getting Help

Foreword
This is the second Issue of the GOCE which takes place in Munich on 31 March
All GOCE newsletters can be obtained from the
Newsletter, following up on the first issue of and 1 April 2011, and the 2011 European
GOCE web portal:
May 2010. It is being released prior to the Geosciences Union General Assembly in Vienna,
http://earth.esa.int/GOCE
4th International GOCE User Workshop, 3-6 April 2011.

GOCE Mission accomplished!


On 2 March 2011, ESA’s Director of Earth mission design which foresaw two so-called GOCE satellite and its payload are in good
Observation Programmes, Prof. Volker Liebig, Measurement Operations Phases, each of 6 health and continue to deliver top science
announced to all GOCE users and to Member months duration. data. On 24 November 2011, and based on
States delegations that GOCE has completed The accompanying release of the second- the excellent achievements of the mission so
its nominal mission, after having completed generation gravity field products marks this far, ESA’s Earth Observation Programme
twelve full months of gravity field mapping. milestone. Board approved the extension of GOCE
This achievement matches the nominal operations through 2012.

GOCE Mission Status March 2011


At the completion of its second year in orbit, have remained constant since launch. The which foresaw hibernating the satellite
on 17 March 2011, the GOCE satellite and its persistent low solar activity throughout during eclipses.
payload are in excellent conditions and 2010, the good health of the power
operating nominally. The configuration of subsystem and the excellent thermo-elastic As already stated, the nominal mission’s lifetime
both payloads and all satellite subsystem stability of satellite and gradiometer have of 12 months continuous operations, has
has remained unchanged since the issue of allowed to continue science measurements been accomplished in early March. Currently,
the first GOCE newsletter in May 2010. In during eclipse phases. Operating all year measurement cycle #7 is being executed. The
particular, the orbital altitude of 254.9 km round significantly increases the overall data individual measurement cycles are shifted
and the respective 61 days repeat cycle return compared to pre-launch planning, with respect to each other along the equator
goce newsletter Issue 2 | March 2011

in order to decrease the distance between expected to double further until the and relaying data towards the antenna,
ascending node crossings. An average maximum of the current solar cycle will be completely stopped the capability to transfer
distance of ascending node crossings of 10 reached in 2013. Peaks due to solar flares will both science and housekeeping data to
km has been achieved by now. The advantage still reach higher levels. Current predictions ground. Due to that anomaly no science data
of this strategy, compared to longer repeat indicate that it will be possible for the major are available between 8 July and 27
cycles which would yield a denser ground part of 2011 to keep the orbital altitude September 2010.
coverage pattern, lies in a reduced sensitivity constant at 254.9 km. A second anomaly related to a software
to measurement interruptions due to satellite problem with the GPS payload SSTI caused
anomalies. Two satellite anomalies leading to significant an interruption of the scientific measurements
interruptions of science measurements were between 2 and 19 January 2011.
Solar activity has increased in recent weeks encountered since the publication of the last Both anomalies have been resolved and do
and its evolution is being carefully monitored. newsletter. First, a problem in the data not impact the successful continuation of the
The average drag levels have gone up by communication between the main computer mission even beyond the current end of
roughly a factor two since launch and are and the telemetry module, which is formatting mission date in December 2012.

release of the second generation GOCE gravity field solutions


The second-generation gravity field solutions These new solutions are available free of http://earth.esa.int/object/index.cfm?
have been released on March 11, 2011. charge, through the usual data services, fobjectid=7484 (Time-wise solution)
These new solutions are based on 8 months of EOLI and the GOCE Virtual Online Archive as well as from ICGEM.
data, November 2009 to July 2010 (effectively (see below).
6 months after reduction of data gaps and Full error variance-covariance matrices for these A first generation of GOCE gravity field
calibration phases). models are available and may be downloaded models, based on 2 months of data (1 Nov
So-called direct and time-wise numerical from the GOCE Virtual Online Archive, where 2009 through 31 Dec 2009), had already been
solutions are available, both representing a more complete description of the models released at ESA's Living Planet symposium in
satellite-only gravity field solutions. The characteristics may also be found. Bergen, Norway, July 2010.
products associated with these solutions, are:
• Direct solution : A subset of these data, the models’ gravity The accuracy improvement of the new-
GO_CONS_EGM_GOC_2__20091101T00 field spherical harmonics coefficients, had generation solutions over these first-generation
0000_20100630T235959_0001.TGZ already been released by ESA in February ones is relevant and, essentially, as expected
• time-Wise solution: 2011. They may be directly downloaded in from the augmented statistics. in accordance
GO_CONS_EGM_GOC_2__20091101T00 plain ASCII format from the GOCE web with the increase of the data amount by a
0000_20100705T235500_0001.TGZ portal, see: factor three, the improvement on degree-error
A third solution, so-called space-wise solution, http://earth.esa.int/object/index.cfm? median is of the order of √3, over a wide
will be released later on. fobjectid=7490 (Direct solution) spectral range.

the GOCE gravity field solutions: Dir, tiM and SPW


Three different solutions for the gravity field None of these two new solutions incorporate to deliver gridded data in a local geographical
are being released by ESA, representing the surface data or airborne data in any way. reference frame. Grids may either be referred
Time-wise solution (TIM), the Direct solution at mean satellite altitude, returning the
(DIR) and the Space-wise solution (SPW). The Space-wise (SPW) model makes use of gravitational potential and its second order
both satellite tracking data, derived from the derivatives thus representing the original
The time-wise solution is inferred from GOCE on-board GPS receiver, and gravity gradients information from Mission data, or, through
data exclusively, i.e. it does not contain observed by the on-board electrostatic downward continuation, at ground level,
gravity field information through a background gradiometer. Reduced dynamic orbits are used returning the diagonal component of the
reference model. Therefore, it is representative for geo-locating gravity gradients. EGM2008 is gravity gradient tensor. External information,
of the GOCE mission performance and constitutes used for degree variance modelling and for such as other independent global models
an independent means of comparison to other error calibration of the estimated gravitational based on satellite and/or ground data, may be
models. This is illustrated in Fig. 1. potential along track, thus affecting the low easily integrated in gridded representations.
degrees of the solution. As mentioned above, Easier integration in geophysical applications
The direct numerical solution, in contrast with the second generation SPW model has not will also result. High resolutions may be
the time-wise one, has been constructed been released together with the DIR and achieved by gridding.
taking prior gravity field information through TIM models. It will be released as soon as
a background reference mode. As such, it it has been produced and validated by the
incorporates data from other satellite relevant science teams.
missions, such as GRACE. The low degrees of
the direct solution are consequently more During the extended mission, the processing
accurate than those of the time-wise solution. team behind the Space-wise solution plans

2
goce newsletter Issue 2 | March 2011

improvements on the geoid model from the new solutions


The blue curve in Figure 1 represents the increase of the data amount by a factor of not representative of the GOCE mission
degree error median of the current 6-month about 3. performance only, but constitutes a model
solution and shows the significant improvement It can be shown that this factor of √3 is not that is based on both GRACE and GOCE. The
achieved compared to the previous solution (red only present in the formal errors, but is a real low degrees of the direct solution are conse-
curve), which was based on 2-months of data. improvement of the gravity field accuracy. For quently more accurate than those of the time-
The improvement is of the order of √3 over this purpose, gravity anomaly differences wise solution. A second difference is due to
a wide spectral range, in accordance with the between the 2-months solution (Fig. 2, left), the regularization method used when solving
the new solution (Fig. 2, right), for the Stokes coefficients. Regularization of
and EGM2008 up to degree/order the gravity field solutions is necessary due
200 have been computed. Signifi- to the polar gaps in the data coverage, and
cant noise reduction is clearly the direct solution applies spherical cap
achieved over the open oceans and regularization (Metzler and Pail [1]). This
regions with high-quality terrestrial regularization approach consists in employing
gravity field data (Europe, North an analytical continuous geopotential function
America, Australia) incorporated using a gravity field model.
in EGM2008. The large differences Figure 4 presents the geoid height differences
over the continents, which are of several models with EIGEN-51C [2], which
due to inaccurate surface data is a recent GRACE and surface data combined
and a non-optimum combination model. The new GOCE model by means of
of satellite and surface data in the direct approach, labelled E-GOCE-69-6 in
EGM2008, are presently particularly Fig. 4, is a satellite-only model that has been
well visible (Fig. 2, right). determined with 6 months of GOCE data,
whereas the background model ITG-Grace2010s
Fig. 1 The propagated geoid height [3] constitutes the GRACE contribution. The
The degree (error) medians of the 2-month errors to degree/order 200 are latter model has been used in the spherical
and 6-month time-wise gravity field solutions.

Fig. 2
Gravity anomaly differences between EGM2008 and the 2-month (left) and 6-month (right) time-wise gravity field models.

shown in Fig. 3, the three main cap regularization. The first direct approach
features of which are: gravity field model, labelled DIR in Fig. 4, is
• Almost no striping due to very similar to EIGEN-51C because it was
homogeneous orbit coverage used in the spherical cap regularization.
• Asymetry due to lower mean Because of the strong regularization applied
orbit altitude in Northern and the higher resolution of the latter model,
hemisphere the first direct model is not a pure satellite-only
• Increased error south of Australia model and as a result compares better to
due to data interpolation surface data than the new model. The models
labelled TIM and SPW in Fig. 4 are the 2-month
As mentioned above, the direct time-wise and space-wise gravity field
numerical solution is inferred models, respectively.
from the GOCE data, but, contrary Differences for ITG-Grace2010s are also
to the time-wise model, it has shown in Fig. 4 in order to show the impact
Fig. 3 been constructed taking prior of the GOCE data especially above degree
Propagated geoid height errors (degree/order gravity field information through a background 140.
200) of the new 6-month time-wise solution. reference model into account. Therefore, it is The importance and the effect of regularization

3
goce newsletter Issue 2 | March 2011

are demonstrated in Fig. 5 by comparing to the


reference model EGM2008. The left frame Fig. 4
presents very large differences between Geoid height differences
EGM2008 and the free solution, and this of ITG-Grace2010s, the
ill-conditioned problem due to the polar gap 2-month direct (DIR), the
clearly requires regularization. The right 2-month time-wise (TIM),
frame of Fig. 5 shows the differences when the 2-month space-wise
regularization, in this case spherical cap (SPW), and the new direct
regularization, has been applied. model (E-GOCE-69-6) with
EIGEN-51C.
An example of external validation is shown in
Fig. 6, namely by comparing the models to the
German GPS/levelling data set as a function of
model resolution (degree). A significantly
better agreement of the GOCE models for
degrees higher than 150 is observed compared
to the GRACE-only model ITG-Grace2010. The
comparison also improves for the time-wise

Fig. 5
Geoid differences between EGM2008 and
the free (left) and spherical cap regularized
models when more data are assimilated, i.e., (right) solutions.
EGM-TIM1 versus EGM-TIM2. The agreement
for the direct models is worse presently (EGM-
DIR2 versus EGM-DIR1) at high degree due Fig. 6
to the different regularization, based on Validation of the 2-months
satellite data only, that was applied. Finally, (‘1’) and 6-months (‘2’)
based on the increasing accuracy of the GOCE time-wise (‘TIM’) and direct
models with time, the agreement with (‘DIR’) solutions based on
GPS/levelling data set will probably be near the German GPS/levelling
the level of EGM2008 at degree/order 200 data set. Results for the
GRACE-only ITG-Grace2010s
at the end of the first extended mission in
and reference combination
December 2012. model EGM2008 are also
given for comparison
[1] Metzler B, Pail R (2005) GOCE data purposes.
processing: the Spherical Cap Regularization
Approach. Stud Geophys Geod, 49:441-462.
doi:10.1007/s11200-005-0021-5
[2] Bruinsma SL, Marty JC, Balmino G, Biancale
R, Förste C, Abrikosov O, Neumayer H (2010)
GOCE Gravity Field Recovery by Means of the
Direct Numerical Method. Paper presented at
the ESA Living Planet Symposium, 28 June –
2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway
[3] Mayer-Gürr T, Kurtenbach E, Eicker A
(2010) The Satellite-only Gravity Field Model
ITG-Grace2010s. http://www.igg.uni-bonn.
de/apmg/index.php?id=itg-grace2010

4
goce newsletter Issue 2 | March 2011

instruments Performance and Data quality


For all data released, reports on instruments, Information are provided in several formats November 2009 through November 2010
spacecraft or processing issues affecting the and views, such as: reports are available, to date.
quality of data may be found on the GOCE • EGG summary table Summary tables present a view of the overall
Quality Control (QC) web page: Synthetic view for EGG data quality status of instrument data, see Figure 7.
• SSti summary table Events are colour coded, indicating satellite
http://earth.esa.int/GOCE/ → “Level 1b QC Synthetic view for SST data quality outages, calibrations or special events (any
• Monthly reports non-routine event). Special events cells are
The GOCE QC page provides information on Reference QC reports for all released data. usually clickable, for access to detailed analysis.
the performance of GOCE's EGG and SSTI • reports
instruments, through daily and monthly Other Reports/Announcements of general Data gaps on EGG are most often a result of
reports. interest. processing issues on-ground.

Fig. 7 Fig. 8
Summary table for EGG instrument. Effect on trace spetral density varying the
See earth.esa.int/GOCE/ → “Level 1b QC” → EGG STR used for the attitude control

Fig. 9
STR1 flagged in dark
green, STR2 flagged
In-flight calibration operations for Inverse in light green
Calibration Matrix determination is always
connected with EGG data unavailability (24 Fig. 10
hours, usually). Kalman filter reinitializations Beam Out event, as seen
also occur after calibration, affecting the in common mode
following half a day. accelerations data.
Relevant data loss or corruption have
resutlted only by the major spacecraft
anomalies, so far:
12/02 to 1/03/2010: CDMU-A failure and
switchover to the redundant CDMU-B. During
the anomaly no EGG data are available. 30/05/2010: Communication link between Use of STR1 instead of STR2 in the attitude
Some of the SSTI data are missing (for IPCU and CDMU occurred. This forced a fallback control loop is a known cause of performance
details see the February 2010 monthly QC to FPM. worsening, limited to the lower part of the
report). Other special events are usually related to measured bandwidth, see Figure 8.
20/03/2010: EGG control SW anomaly. A gap either a change of the STR used in the atti- An overview the STR in use during Operations
of 197 seconds in EGG datasets results, with tude control loop or to beam-outs from the may be read out from Figure 9. April 2010
consequent, Kalman filter reinitialization. Ion Propulsion system. has been the most affected period, with 23

5
→ ESa’S Gravity MiSSiOn Issue 2 | March 2011

days of STR1 being used in the attitude gradients time series, notably the Uxx
control loop. component, see Figure 11.
Beam Out events alter common mode Impact on data is limited to the event itself,
accelerations data, see Figure 10. not propagating forward. Ten Beam Out
Beam-out induced oscillations enter the events have occurred, so far.

Fig. 11
Gravity gradients Power
Spectral Density over one day
Left panel includes effect of
beam-out.

accurate GOCE orbits from the SSt_PSO_2 product


The SSTI delivers high-quality and continuous (SST_PCV) over a few subsequent epochs. Ranging (SLR) measurements, which are
1 Hz GPS measurements on 12 channels. The purpose of the reduced-dynamic orbit is provided by the International Laser Ranging
Since the very beginning of the mission, the to geolocate the satellite and its instruments Service (ILRS). This important contribution
excellent SSTI data quality has allowed to with highest accuracy. The kinematic orbit of the ILRS to the mission is gratefully
generate precise continuous GOCE orbits does not depend on GOCE dynamic orbit acknowledged. The SLR residuals in Figure
(SST_PSO) with the required accuracy. The models, and is thus best suitable for the 12 (Mean: 0.81 cm, RMS: 2.16 cm) are
SST_PSO product consists of two different recovery of the long wavelength part of the sorted in ascending (dusk) and descending
orbit types, a reduced-dynamic (SST_PRD) Earth’s gravity field. (dawn) passes. Due to the sun-synchronous
and a kinematic (SST_PKI) orbit. The latter The validation of the GPS-derived orbits is orbit, passes are always occurring during
one is accompanied by covariance information done with independent Satellite Laser dusk or dawn.

Fig. 12
SLR residuals of the reduced-
dynamic orbits (SST_PRD)

Pubblications
A special issue of the Journal of Geodesy dedi- and technical output from the GOCE Mission
cated to the GOCE Mission is in preparation. to date. Publication of the Journal special issue
It will be a reference resource for all scientific will be announced on GOCE’s website.

6
→ ESa’S Gravity MiSSiOn Issue 2 | March 2011

How to obtain GOCE Data


available datasets Level Product Single product span Description
Available GOCE Level-1b and Level-2 Level 1b EGG_NOM_1b 1 orbit Nominal Gradiometer Instrument data
datasets are listed in Table 1.
SST_NOM_1b 1 orbit Nominal SSTI Instrument (GPS) data
SST_RIN_1b 1 orbit Nominal SSTI Instrument (GPS) data in
RINEX format
Level 2 EGG_NOM_2 1 day Calibrated and corrected gravity gradients
in the gradiometer reference frame
EGG_TRF_2 1 day to 1 month Calibrated and corrected gravity gradients in
the terrestrial reference frame
SST_PSO_2 1 day Precise Science Orbits
Level 2 EGM_GOC_2 > 2 months Gravity solution. First and Second Generation
Table 1
gravity solutions are available with three different
Available solutions processing techniques: direct numerical
GOCE solution, Time-wise and Space-wise solutions.
products
EGM_GVC_2 > 2 months Calibrated and corrected gravity gradients in
the terrestrial reference frame

Data access
GOCE data access is open and free of charge, provide an account with ordering privileges. EOLI users receive, for each order, a link for
in line with the new ESA Earth Observation GOCE data will then be accessible either downloading the data via ftp, while Virtual
policies on free datasets. More detailed through GOCE’s Virtual on-line Archive Archive users can directly download data
information on ESA Earth Observation data (http://eo-virtual-archive1.esa.int/index.html) through http, without the need of submitting
access may be found at: or through ESA’s Multi-Mission archive, EOLI-SA orders. EOLI interface offers, however, more
http://earth.esa.int/dataproducts/accessin (see http://earth.esa.int/EOLi/EOLi.html). flexibility and tools for data selection.
geodata. Variance/Covariance matrices (EGM_GVC_2)
In order to access GOCE data, users need to From EOLI-SA, products are made available are only available through the GOCE Virtual
register via the WWW site: either as single products or as Global products, Archive.
http://eopi.esa.int/registration. collecting one week of data each. No quota All details and up-to-day news on GOCE data
Users may also contact the ESA’s Help and limitation applies but orders may be limited availability can be found on GOCE’s portal
Order Desk (EOHelp@esa.int), for guidance to a maximum of 20 products. Global (weekly) (http://earth.esa.int/GOCE).
on the registration process. products should be used for larger orders, in
Once users are registered, ESA’s helpdesk will place of single products.

Fig. 13
The GOCE Virtual Online Archive at
http://eo-virtual- archive1.esa.int/Index.html

Fig. 14
The ESA Multi Mission
Archive EOLI-SA

Processing GOCE Data


L1b and Level 2 product readers
GOCE data conform to the Earth Explorers File parsing tool for extracting the datasets of Both XML parser and the Matlab routines may
Format, which is based on XML. interest, ESA provides two basic tools for be downloaded from the GOCE website, under
Product handbooks for both Level-1b and processing L1b and L2 data: the right-menu bar entry: “Key Resources”
Level-2 products are available from the GOCE • XML Parser for Level 1b and Level 2 data (see Figure 13):
portal, containing most of the information • Basic Matlab routines for specific L1b data. • http://earth.esa.int/object/index.cfm?fobject
needed for understanding GOCE’s data id=7042
formats and contents. The XML parser runs on Mac, Windows and • http://earth.esa.int/object/index.cfm?fobject
While each user is free to develop its own Linux platforms. id=7530

7
→ ESa’S Gravity MiSSiOn Issue 2 | March 2011

the GUt Software suite


The GUT (GOCE User Toolbox) is the result Conventions and ancillary datasets, • Support for multi-data netCDF
of the work of a team of European research including a priori surfaces (DEM, MSS, MDT). • Anisotropic spatial filtering
institutes and industries led by Danish • Compute geoid heights at a chosen • Bicubic spline interpolation
Technical University Space (DTU Space) maximum degree and order over a grid or • Removal of scalar bias from a grid/transect
under ESA Contract. The objectives of the transect. • Adjustment of geoid heights in spectral
project are to develop a toolbox that facilitates • Compute gravity anomalies, height anomalies domain by height correction terms
the use, viewing and post-processing of and vertical deflections on the surface of the • Handling of time-system attribute for
GOCE Level 2 mission data and to pursue terrain for a range of maximum degree and time-varying surfaces
the research in the fields of geodesy, order expansions over a grid or transect. • Enhancement of the statistic tools
oceanography and solid Earth physics, while • Compute a gridded field from its spherical
exploiting the newly released GOCE dataset. harmonic expansion. Toolboxes will be demonstrated on the first
• Compute the spherical harmonic expansion day of the GOCE User Workshop (31 March)
The GUT software is a command-line of a gridded field. and also presented on an oral presentation.
processor that has been designed for users at • Compute the ocean’s mean dynamic GUT software can be freely downloaded from
all levels of expertise. For the novice user, topography and the geostrophic velocities, GUT’s website:
pre-built workflows allow the rapid with the option of isotropic filtering in the http://earth.esa.int/gut , or from the related
computation of geophysical parameters, spatial or spectral domains. link on GOCE webpage (under “Key Resources”).
including geoid heights, gravity anomalies • Transform data between different reference
and ocean mean dynamic topographies in a ellipsoid and tide-systems.
single step, with very little user input • Support configurable high-level processing.
required. More experienced users can generate • Produce final output products in netCDF-CF

gut
their own workflows for enhanced or more format, GRAVSOFT, KML and TIFF.
specialised processing.
The version 2.0 will be released and distributed
The current GUT release 1.1 features: to users during the 4th GOCE User Workshop,
featuring:
GOCE USER TOOLBOX
• Reading the GOCE XML Level 2 Products • Support for IGCEM Format
(EGM_GOC_2), GRAVSOFT, netCDF in CF- • Support to solid Earth community

Staying up-to-date: the GOCE Portal


The GOCE portal is the single and comprehensive
access point for all GOCE-related information,
resources and data access. Please, visit it
regularly for announcements and updates.

http://earth.esa.int/GOCE

Fig. 16
The GOCE main
portal at
http://earth.esa.int/
GOCE

8
→ ESa’S Gravity MiSSiOn Issue 2 | March 2011

Getting Help
ESA’s Earth Observation User Services in
ESRIN, Italy, is the entity ensuring a user-
friendly interface between the satellite system
and the data users. Services provided to users
include:

• Help services from the EO Help Desk team


• Order Handling by the Order Desk
• Mission planning and production planning
• Maintenance of catalogues and ordering tools
• On-line information services: (Earthnet
online, EO Portal and Disasters Charter)

All these interfaces are further described on


GOCE’s web site.

Contact:
European Space agency - goce newsletter On behalf of the GOCE team
ESRIN | Frascati (Rome) | Italy rune Floberghagen
http://earth.esa.int/goce rune.floberghagen@esa.int

Copyright © 2011 European Space Agency

Вам также может понравиться