Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
Journal of Religion.
http://www.jstor.org
Review Article
* Georges Bataille, The Unfinished System of Nonknowledge, ed. and introd. Stuart Kendall,
trans. Michelle Kendall and Stuart Kendall (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001),
xliv⫹305 pp., $39.95 (cloth).
1
See John D. Caputo, The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida: Religion without Religion
(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997).
2
Mark C. Taylor first used this phrase in reference to deconstruction. See Erring: A
Postmodern A/theology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), p. 6.
78
Georges Bataille’s Religion
79
The Journal of Religion
gling on a wall.”3 One can feel his vulnerability and undefended ex-
posure when faced with the relentless questioning of Hyppolite and
Sartre. The selections taken from his personal notebooks further this
impression, showing clearly how agitated he was by the reviews of his
work, especially the Sartrean polemics. For these intimate glimpses of
the misery behind the man most often deemed a monster, The Unfin-
ished System of Nonknowledge is already invaluable.
But its value extends beyond this. For, though it contains little that
cannot be found in the published works, The Unfinished System of Non-
knowledge also captures the main trends of Bataille’s thinking. Like
Friedrich Nietzsche, Bataille was disillusioned with the emancipatory
aims of nineteenth- and early twentieth-century liberalism and sought
a liberation beyond that promised by liberal modernity. The liberal
world, according to Bataille, was the bourgeois, workaday world of
modern individualism, a world that degrades man by rendering all of
human activity subordinate to some end outside that activity itself. In
this sense, modernity determined human life in terms of action gov-
erned by what Bataille called “project.” Project makes every moment
of life servile by valuing it solely in relation to its usefulness in pro-
ducing a desired end. It finds an ally or mirror, according to Bataille,
in the forms of knowledge and rationality promoted by Hegelian sys-
tematic philosophy. For Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, according to
Bataille, reasonable thought is systematic thought that sees each indi-
vidual and each moment in relation to the whole that transcends it.
Bataille was sensitive to the fact that the Hegelian dialectic of con-
sciousness is driven by unhappy consciousness and that it represents
the historical progress of the slave who survives the struggle with the
master. The Hegelian spirit, which for Bataille expressed the spirit of
modernity, belongs therefore to a sad, servile, and serious culture, a
culture that is always on the job, one that has no time for errant mo-
ments of laughter, tears, drunkenness, or ecstasy. These nonproductive
instances of useless nonknowledge suppressed by the workaday logic
of the workaday world are indices pointing to modernity’s lack of lack,
its lack of the meaningless amid the fullness and completion of mean-
ing achieved by the modern world. There is, in the modern world, no
rose that grows without why.4
In his revaluation of meaningless moments, experiences of luck, and
the aleatory, Bataille foreshadows a more widely accepted project
3
T. S. Eliot, “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” lines 56–58, in Norton Anthology of Poetry,
3d ed. (New York: Norton, 1983), p. 995.
4
The rose that grows without why is an image from Angelus Silesius, also assumed by Martin
Heidegger.
80
Georges Bataille’s Religion
5
Mark C. Taylor, Altarity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).
81
The Journal of Religion
6
See Amy Hollywood, “Bataille and Mysticism: A Dazzling Dissolution,” Diacritics 26
(Summer 1996): 77–85, “‘Beautiful as a Wasp’: Angela of Foligno and Georges Bataille,”
Harvard Theological Review 92 (April 1999): 219–36, and Sensible Ecstasy (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 2002). See also Peter Tracey Connor, Georges Bataille and the Mysticism of Sin
(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000).
82
Georges Bataille’s Religion
lence is nowhere more evident than in his readings of its mystical mo-
ments. Allied with the sacred, the mystical is the obvious forerunner
to what Bataille terms “inner experience,” the “sovereign moment,” or
often quite simply “ecstasy” or “the spiritual”—terms designating what
breaks with the servility of knowledge, individualism, and project. In
its move toward nothingness and the unknown, in its annihilation of
the rational faculties, and in its ecstatic passage beyond the limits of
individual existence, mysticism (like the sacred) involves a radical un-
knowing or loss of self. Ecstatic spirituality, for Bataille, thus points the
self beyond the possibilities that a subject can realize by itself toward
an experience of the impossible, namely, the experience of its own
death or annihilation.
Culminating in annihilation, mystical experience would give access
to the impossible, meaningless, and aleatory (what comes despite me)
that was excluded from the modern project of work and knowledge.
Here death and negativity are not put to work, as they are for the
Hegelian dialectic, in the production of a future moment or higher
affirmation of meaning. In the finality of unknowing and nothingness,
mystical ecstasy points toward an impossible enjoyment of the sover-
eignty of the present—“the rose grows without why” in an unknowing
experience of a present that looks neither to past cause nor future
fulfillment. Ecstatic experience and unknowing thus liberate a sover-
eign moment, a present that plays freely, freed as it is from subordi-
nation to the usefulness of a project aiming at a future beyond where
loss is redeemed.
And yet, according to Bataille, Christianity betrays the mystical mo-
ment by introducing God and salvation. Viewed in light of salvation,
the mystical moment of nonknowledge becomes productive, a step in
the plan aiming at a salvific end external to this moment. “He who
loses himself saves himself” would be the slogan of this Christian re-
versal of the mystical loss of self: here, ecstasy and loss are not sacrifice
and annihilation but efforts aimed at saving, not spending, except in-
sofar as such spending earns a return, namely, the reinstatement of the
self in a higher moment. “God,” for Bataille, is then the name of that
which guarantees or provides certainty for this project, the name that
transforms the impossible dispossession of self in mystical ecstasy into
a possibility of the self, namely, the possibility of personal salvation that
can be attained. “God” forecloses the impossible, making the experi-
ence of dispossession a possibility I can realize, a possibility named
“salvation.” Expenditure and nonknowledge are thereby limited by
“God,” a term that provides an endpoint where inner experience be-
83
The Journal of Religion
84
Georges Bataille’s Religion
7
The phrase “turn to religion” was popularized by Hent De Vries, Philosophy and the Turn
to Religion (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999), though Taylor had already called
attention to the phenomenon with a different name and different emphases; see Taylor, Erring
and Altarity.
85
The Journal of Religion
86
Georges Bataille’s Religion
87