Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
JANUARY 1989
fastener holes and often have rather complex failure modes. Within a multi-
effects of bearing loads and loads that bypass the hole, as illustrated in
figure 1. The ratio of bearing load to bypass load depends on the joint
the same year, Garbo [ 3 ] used his BJSFM analysis to obtain the stresses in a
the hole and the fastener. The presence o f a clearance leads to a contact
1
region at the bolt-hole interface that varies nonlinearlv with tts l o a & and
influences the stress state around the hole. Although this nonlinearity
the fastener leading to "dual contact". The effects of clearance have been
dual contact, and then to study the effects of bearing-bypass loads on bolt-
hole contact and local stresses. The present approach uses a linear-elastic
the bolt diameter. These equations describe the contact conditions more
tracking along the contact arc [ 9 - 1 2 1 . The finite element analysis was
frictionless.
and the bolt-hole contact angle for various combinations of bearing and bypass
loads. Also, the effect of bypass load on the bolt-hole contact angle is
2
presented for constant bearing loads. Hole boundary stresses for a range of
presented for a typical bearing load level. Finally, a solution array for a
NOMENCLATURE
C radial clearance, m
C
d diametrical clearance, %
d hole diameter, m
G12
shear modulus, GPa
P applied load, N
P bypass load, N
bP
r,O polar coordinates, m, degrees
3
B bearing-bypass ratio, S /S
b nP
Poisson’s ratio
9 2
bolt-hole contact angle, degrees
, e2
0 stress component, MPa
ANALYSIS
bypass stress S are defined as shown in figure 2. The bolt was assumed to
nP
be rigid and the bolt-hole interface to be frictionless. The diametrical
clearance cd between the hole and the bolt was expressed as a percentage of
the hole diameter d. The material represented in the analysis was a quasi-
elements were used to model the laminate (4,131. Nodes were placed at every
0.9375 degrees along the hole boundary to model the contact angles accurately.
Loads P and P
were applied to the ends of the model. The desired
bP
bearing-bypass ratio B was obtained by an appropriate choice of P and
P
bP -
For a snug-fit joint (cd - 0), the contact angle el along the bolt-
hole interface does not vary with Sb and a simple linear stress analysis can
4
be used. However, for a clearance-fit joint (cd > 0), the contact angle
Inverse Formulation
tedious node tracking along the contact arc [9-121. Alternatively, an inverse
described later. The inverse technique is simple to use because the boundary
conditions for an assumed contact angle are fixed and known at the
B1
outset. For an assumed contact angle, the contact problem is linear, and the
finite element analyses; linear NASTRAN [13] procedures were used to solve
5
Displacement Constraint Equations
Figure 4 shows the analysis model for a typical case of contact at the
bolt-hole interface. The bolt radius rb is smaller than the hole radius P
contact occurs only at point A. After the model is loaded on the two ends by
P and P , points along the hole boundary which lie within an assumed
bP
contact arc AB contact the frictionless surface of the fixed rigid bolt.
follows :
A u + B v - C
where
A-RcosB - C
B - R sin B
6
C R c (COS B - 1) (5)
computed at the outset since they are functions of the initial geometry. In
the finite element analysis, the displacements of each node within the contact
Note that the hole boundary beyond the contact arc is stress free. This fact
hole tends to close on the bolt leading to dual contact at the bolt-hole
interface. For example, point D on the hole boundary in figure 4 could move
in the positive x-direction and make contact with the bolt surface. This
would correspond to the onset of dual contact. Further loading would lead to
dual contact as shown in figure 5. The contact angles B1 and B2 for dual
contact would also, in general, vary nonlinearly with load. However, the
inverse technique can also be used for dual contact. Multi-point constraints,
The correct bearing stress Sb for an assumed contact angle B1, was
established using a simple procedure and the NASTRAN computer code. Point A
(figure 4), which was assumed to be in contact with the rigid bolt, was fixed.
those allowed by the multi-point constraints given by Eq. ( 2 ) . Thus all the
7
boundary conditions, including those along the bolt-hole interface, are
defined. However, since the contact angle O1 and the nominal bearing stress
is still unknown.
For a specified el, the problem is linear and thus, the stresses in
where F1, F2, and F are constants for a given r and 8. The first two
3
terms in this equation represent the orr
components due to the applied
bearing and bypass loads, respectively. The third term represents the
urr
due to imposing the rnulti-point constraints and is a function of clearance, as
indicated by Eqs. ( 2 - 5 ) .
The hole boundary region beyond the contact angle is stress free. Thus,
8
This stress boundary condition was imposed at the end of the contact arc as
If Sb
* is the correct bearing stress for an assumed contact angle 0 1, then
(8) to get one equation for F,(R,B,) and F,,(R,B1). A second Sb was
selected (arbitrarily) and again the corresponding orr at the end of the
9
versus d1 curves for single contact in the clearance-fit joint. The above
applied for both tension and compression bearing-bypass loads which lead to
single contact. A slightly different procedure is used for dual contact and
contact at the bolt. The dual contact angles 1 9 ~ and d2 (see figure 5 )
linear equation relating 0 Sb, and Scan be written for the end of
rr ’ nP
, each contact arc. For point B (see figure 5),
The constants K1 through K6 are similar to those in Eq. (6). Again, the
first two terms in both Eqs. ( 1 4 ) and (15) represent the 0 components
rr
due to the bearing and bypass loads, respectively. The third term represents
and (15) cannot be simplified further using Eq. ( 7 ) , as was done earlier for
the single-contact case (see Eqs. (6) and (8)), because the bearing-bypass
I
10
determined by calculating arr(R,Ol) and urr(R,r-02) for three different
K5, and K6. These six equations are solved simultaneously to determine K1
through K6. Now the correct values of S and S corresponding to the
b "P
assumed el and O 2 values can be determined by imposing the boundary
The only unknowns in the above equations are Sb and S which can be
nP
determined by the simultaneous solution of Eqs. (16) and (17). The above
All of the results in this paper were obtained for the finite size
plate shown in figure 2 with a clearance of 1.2 percent. First, results
d'
11
are presented for single contact with both tension and compression bearing-
stresses are also presented. Results are then presented for dual contact.
Single Contact
450 MPa. The secondary contact angle increased rather abruptly as the
12
For Sb - 400 MPa, the tangential ( a s 8 ) and radial (a
rr
) stresses
around the hole boundary are shown in figure 8 for three different values of
SnP for tension bearing-bypass loading. The peak value of the arr stress
is not very sensitive to S . The arr peak usually occurs at 0 degrees f o r
nP
small values of S However, the distribution of u changes with
nP * rr
increased S values, showing the increased contact angle as in figure 7 .
nP
For S
nP
- 400 MPa, the urr peak occurs at around 5 5 degrees. The increase
occurs at t9 = 0
0
. For example the peak arr stress for S
"P
- 400 MPa is
Dual Contact
curve represents the onset of dual contact. The region to the right of the
13
represents the B = -3 case. Note that this line runs almost parallel to the
that the p - -3 case would never involve dual contact. Thus, dual contact
would occur only when -3 <p I O . The dashed-dot line represents the
figure 11. The Sb versus B1 curve before dual contact was generated using
the curve was constructed from figure 10 by selecting Sb, B1, and e2 values
on the /3 - -0.5 line. Some interpolation was used. The Sb versus
increasing load.
transfer across the bolt and, therefore, reduces the stress concentration
hole boundary stresses for a case with dual contact to stresses for an open
hole case at the same load level. The peak a g e for the open hole case is 13
percent higher than that for the dual-contact case. This suggests that dual
14
I
CONCLUDING REMARKS
This method uses a linear elastic finite element analysis with an inverse
with most general purpose finite element programs. The method was applied to
contact angles and local stresses. The initial clearance between the smooth,
rigid bolt and the hole was 1 . 2 percent of the hole diameter in all analyses.
Sb - 400 MPa, the contact angle was 30 percent larger for - 1 than that for
fl
/3 = a. Compressive bypass loading had the opposite effect, the contact angle
the S stress. The peak radial stress was not very sensitive to S
nP nP'
However, under compressive bearing-bypass loading, both the peak tangential
greater than - 3 , the hole tended to close on the fastener leading to dual
15
contact. Dual contact allows load transfer across the fastener and,
therefore, reduces the stress concentration around the hole. Dual contact,
16
REFERENCES
Fatigue and Fracture, ASTM STP 907, H. T. Hahn, Ed., American Society
6. Crews, J. H., Jr.; and Naik, R. A.: "Combined Bearing and Bypass
Nos. 1-3, 1986, pp. 21-40. Also published as NASA TM-87705, April
1986.
17
7. Eshwar, V. A.: "Analysis of Clearance Fit Pin Joints," International
10. White, D. J.; and Enderby, L. R.: "Finite Element Stress Analysis of a
11. Sholes, A.; and Strover, E. M.: "The Piecewise-Linear Analysis of Two
12. Chan, S . K.; and Tuba, I. S . : "A Finite Element Method for Contact
625.
13. MSC/NASTRAN, User's Manual, Vol. 1 and 2, MSR-39, Nov. 1985, The
18
c c,
c
0 al-4
0
-m
k
E
Q)
4J
I \ I In
(d
cer
I
.I4
4J
rl
2
(d
c
.rl
s
nl-4
3
M
c
.I4
a
(d
0
rl
v)
In
(d
a
h
P
I
M
C
.I4
I O 0 0 0 i I d
I o 0 0 0 II
19
T
0
00
x
.d
a
rl
a
0
2
k
0
n 4-4
P U
na
W
I 4
L)
k
ki
3
I M
-
I
U (v
00 Q)
8.4
II 3
M
.d
3 c4
20
u
a
x 5
C
at
u3
- 0
v)
W
a
I-
u3
n
wl
21
P
t U
0
Q
I U
e
4 0
0
E
rl
u
Q
u
l-
x Q)
J
I
I
'cl
0 *
22
a
0
a
a! u
C
0
2
a
u
r)
a
u
c
0
0
I
In
23
0
\'
1
24
0
0
a
,
0
0
w
P
R
0
0
cv
I t
v
I I
I
I
I
I
I 0
0 0
Q)
c9
.d
u
0 cd
..-I
0 i;
cv 3
cd
I
I
Q)
k
0
0
zl
.d
w crr
I
25
u
h
Ll
cd
a
s
0
P
0)
d
0
c
k
u
v1
00
I I I
0
0 0
v)
F
26
0,
L
:
0
Iv)
\ \
".b"
:. ...
.:.....
...;..
' .\ 0
E:
T
.I4
m
ul
Q)
Q k
2
0
c)
k
0
cw
h
k
ld
Q
0
5
0
0 Ji
aJ
d
0
c
UP M
k
U
(A
27
0
3
3)
I
u
0
Id
0 u
C
0 0
o n 0
l a k-l
e Id
a1
2
U &4
cw0
Q
a=
0
0
rn
I
0
0
28
\0
0
cu
I I I I I
-
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
rc) d= c') cu
h
29
I
\
n
( :v)
0
'F u)
0)
u)
u)
Q)
k
U
L4
9-i
k
ld
Q
5
0
P
Q)
e
I 4
E:
0
a u
e 0
ld
r U
G
0
L)
l-l
ld
0 w 3
a
II I1 cer
0
u
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
v) 0 v)
l- I
BdW
30
Report Documentation Page
1. Report No. 2 . Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No.
NASA TM-100551
4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date
7. Authorls)
16. Abstract
Within a multi-fastener joint, fastener holes may be subjected to the combined effects of bearing loads and
loads that bypass the hole to be reacted elsewhere in the joint. The analysis of a joint subjected to such
combined bearing and bypass loads is complicated by the usual clearance between the hole and the fastene
A simple analysis method for such clearance-fit joints subjected to bearing-bypass loading has been
developed in the present study. It uses an inverse formulation with a linear elastic finite-element analysis.
Conditions along the bolt-hole contact arc are specified by displacement constraint equations. The present
method is simple to apply and can be implemented with most general purpose finite-element programs.
since it does not use complicated iterative-incrementalprocedures. The method was used to study the
effects of bearing-bypass loading on bolt-hole contact angles and local stresses. In this study, a rigid,
frictionless bolt was used with a plate having the properties of a quasi-isotropic graphite/epoxy laminate.
Results showed that the contact angle as well as the peak stresses around the hole and their locations were
strongly influenced by the ratio of bearing and bypass loads. For single contact, tension and compression
bearing-bypass loading had opposite effects on the contact angle. For some compressive bearing-bypass
loads, the hole tended to close on the fastener leading to dual contact. It was shown that dual contact
reduces the stress concentration at the fastener and would, therefore, increase joint strength in com-
Dression. The results illustrate the general imortance of accounting for bolt-hole clearance and and contac
Y Y
Stress analysis
Finite-elements
Bearing-bypass Unclassified - Unlimited
clearance Subject Category - 24
20. Security Classif. (of tl s Pawl I 21. NO. of pa& 122. Price
1
Unclassified Unclassified 31 A03