Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TARGET
General Style
• print or type using a 12-point standard font, such as Times, Arial, Geneva,
Bookman, Helvetica, etc.
• text should be double spaced on 8 1/2" x 11" paper with 1 inch margins,
single sided
• number pages consecutively
• start each new section on a new page
• adhere to recommended page limits
Proofreading/Editing
• check your spelling: spellcheckers are useful for initial checking, but don't
catch homonyms (e.g. hear, here)
• make sure that you use complete sentences
• check your grammar: punctuation, sentence structure, subject-verb
agreement (plural or singular), tense consistency, run-on sentences (use
semi-colons instead) etc.
• give it to others to read and comment
• proofread your work a few times
• as well, edit for content
o does it flow logically
o is there any repetition, is it relevant
o style
• avoid qualitative adjectives when describing concepts that are quantifiable
("The water is deep." "Plate convergence is fast." "Our algorithm is
better.") Instead, quantify. ("Water depths exceed 5km.")
• do not use unexplained acronyms; spell out all acronyms the first time that
you use them
•
Mistakes to avoid
• placing a heading at the bottom of a page with the following text on the
next page (insert a page break!)
• dividing a table or figure - confine each figure/table to a single page
Structure of Paragraphs/Paper
Title Page
Abstract
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
• list anyone who has helped you with your project
Introduction
• goal – combine information about the setting and the story behind the
project (literature review) that gets the reader engaged in the work’s
context
• include the critical question
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Appendices
Title Page
Abstract
Includes:
• rationale behind the study
• purpose of the study - hypothesis, overall question, objective
• focus on summarizing results - limit background information to a
sentence or two, if absolutely necessary
• What did you do? Why did you do your project? What question
were you trying to answer?
• general approach to the problem, pertinent results
• brief description of the methods – How did you do it?
• results, including specific data - if the results are quantitative in
nature, report quantitative data; results of any statistical analysis
should be reported
• What did you learn?
• important conclusions or questions that follow from the experiment(s)
• Why does it matter?
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
The purpose of an introduction is to acquaint the reader with the rationale behind
the work, with the intention of defending it. It places your work in a theoretical
context, and enables the reader to understand and appreciate your objectives.
1. A statement of the goal of the paper: why the study was undertaken, or
why the paper was written. Do not repeat the abstract. Where did the
problem come from?
2. Sufficient background information to allow the reader to understand the
context and significance of the question you are trying to address. (This is
your literature review.) What is already known about this problem?
• It should cite those who had the idea or ideas first, and should also
cite those who have done the most recent and relevant work.
3. The introduction should be focused on the thesis question(s). This is not a
place to summarize everything you have ever read on a subject.
• You should explain why more work was necessary.
4. A verbal "road map" or verbal "table of contents" guiding the reader to
what lies ahead.
5. Is it obvious where introductory material ("old stuff") ends and your
contribution ("new stuff") begins?
Methods
The methods section should answering the following questions and caveats:
Results
The purpose of a results section is to present and illustrate your findings. Make
this section a completely objective report of the results, and save all
interpretation for the discussion.
What to avoid
Style
• As always, use past tense when you refer to your results, and put
everything in a logical order.
• In text, refer to each figure as "figure 1," "figure 2," etc. ; number your
tables as well
• Place your figures and tables appropriately within the text of your results
section.
• Is the figure or table self-explanatory?
• Are your axes labeled and are the units indicated?
• Does the figure caption guide the reader's eye to the "take-home lesson"
of the figure?
• Figures should be oriented vertically, in portrait mode, wherever possible.
If you must orient them horizontally, in landscape mode, orient them so
that you can read them from the right, not from the left, where the binding
will be.
Discussion
The objective here is to provide an interpretation of your results and support for
all of your conclusions, using evidence from your experiment and generally
accepted knowledge, if appropriate. The significance of findings should be clearly
described.
• Draw what conclusions you can based upon the results that you have.
• Explain all of your observations as much as possible.
• What are the major patterns in the observations?
• What are the relationships, trends, and generalizations among the results?
• What are the exceptions to these patterns or generalizations?
• What are the likely causes (mechanisms) underlying these patterns
resulting predictions?
• What is the strongest and most important statement that you can make
from your observations?
• Refer back to the problem posed, and describe the conclusions that you
reached from carrying out this investigation.
o Summarize new observations, new interpretations, and new
insights that have resulted from the present work.
• One experiment will not answer an overall question, so keeping the big
picture in mind, where do you go next? The best studies open up new
avenues of research. What questions remain?
o You may suggest future directions, such as how the research might
be modified to accomplish another objective.
o What is the implication of the present results for other unanswered
questions?
• What are the things we now know or understand that we didn't know or
understand before the present work?
• What changes will you make to your teaching from your research?
This section should be rich in references to similar work and background needed
to interpret results.
References
• cite all ideas, concepts, text, data that are not your own
• if you make a statement, back it up with your own data or a reference
• all references cited in the text must be listed in this section
• cite single-author references by the surname of the author (followed by
date of the publication in parenthesis)
o ... according to Hays (1994)
o ... population growth is one of the greatest environmental concerns
facing future generations (Hays, 1994).
• cite double-author references by the surnames of both authors (followed
by date of the publication in parenthesis)
o e.g. Simpson and Hays (1994)
• cite more than double-author references by the surname of the first author
followed by et al. and then the date of the publication
o e.g. Pfirman, Simpson and Hays would be:
Pfirman et al. (1994)
• do not use footnotes
http://www.library.mun.ca/guides/howto/apa.php
Appendices
Resources:
http://www.delsea.k12.nj.us/Academic/mediaCenter/hs/ActionResearchReport.ht
m
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~bioslabs/tools/report/reportform.html#form
www.cs.toronto.edu/~sme/presentations/thesiswriting.pdf
http://www.charleslipson.com/How-to-write-a-thesis.htm
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~martins/sen_sem/thesis_org.html
http://www.learnerassociates.net/dissthes/
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/thesis.html
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~jw/paper.html