Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
For an Issue of “TRIALOG – A Journal for Planning and Building in the Third World”
Urban life in its countless varieties has become the way of living for the majority of humankind. This
is a significant marker or transformation of the human condition. The de facto absence of spirituality
in Western cities is visible in the total neglect of any link between urbanization or urban
development and spirituality in the literature. Likewise, the revival of spirituality in the West has not
entered the field of urban planning theory or planning practice, even though the implications may be
manifold. One reason why it is so hard to re-define, re-think and re-imagine the city in terms of the
spiritual might be that “Large modern cities, as centres of human endeavour, tend to regard
themselves as centres of the universe and have effectively declared their independence from nature”
(Girardet 2008: 5).
It is disputed whether and to what extent urbanization also contributed to the progressing
disenchantment of people’s imaginaries. Many scholars maintain, the climax of this view of “The
Secular City” (Harvey Cox 1965) was reached in the 20th century. Yet only twenty years later Cox felt
to observe a return of religion to the Secular City (Cox 1984). In any case, by the twentieth century,
industrial societies in particular were strongly oriented to the cognitive, the rational, and the logical,
with devastating consequences: science largely unrestrained by ethics (whether from religion or
anywhere else) helped to deliver the most violent and most environmentally damaging century in
human history (Gardner 2002: 9). At the same time, urbanization played a role in the modernist
development path that was exported to the developing world with the same aim to ‘rationalise’
those societies: “The organizing premise was the belief in the role of modernization as the only force
capable of destroying archaic superstitions and relations, at what ever social, cultural, and political
cost. Industrialization and urbanization were seen as the inevitable and necessarily progressive
routes to modernization” (Escobar 2005: 86).
A pivotal assumption of the above argument is that urbanization and the notion of development are
both causes and drivers of modernization, they are, just like industrialization and rational thought,
part of what is commonly understood as “modernity”. This process resulted in a rigid separation of
science and spirituality/religion, with the former rising to become the sole perspective of interpreting
reality, the universe and everything else, and the latter being exiled in the name of secularity from
academic discourse and the practice of life. In response to this development of epistemologies, the
critique of science (actually on “scientism”) and modernity coupled with advances in quantum
physics resulted in “new” scientific insights (e.g. complexity and chaos theory), endeavours in
recognizing the “Tao of Physics” by combining Western knowledge and Eastern wisdom which
1
subsequently gave rise in the past thirty years to meta-theoretical and integral philosophy that
attempt to reconcile the schism of matter and mind. Eventually, these emerging scientific and
philosophical insights - so it is assumed and expected and hoped - will trigger a new understanding of
the world, a new cosmology.
As a result of this brief introduction to the topic, a series of questions arise, which may be addressed
in this issue:
- How are religion and spirituality different? What is their relationship/interface?
- What does spirituality mean in the context of planning, planning theory/practice and the
practitioner? Is it another analytical category for practitioners or an inherent dimension that
needs to be practiced in some way?
- How and why do city dwellers take recourse to spirituality? What is or may be the role(s) of
spirituality for urban societies?
- Which are the potentials of spirituality for the planning profession and urban development
planning? Case studies from different regions of the world?
- Is it feasible to integrate spirituality with urban development? Its role in relation to very
practical approaches/instruments: governance, participation and communication, analysing
and understanding the city and its inhabitants;
- How is spirituality related to (human) development? What is or may be its role in
international development?
- In which way is spirituality expressed in an urban context in different parts of the world?
- “Best practices” demonstrating the role of spirituality in urban development?
Obviously, these are complex and sometimes fundamental questions which may not be answered or
tackled conclusively in a TRIALOG issue. Its purpose is rather to introduce an altogether neglected
topic to urban development and practitioners in an explorative fashion. Insofar it is much more
opening “Pandora’s box” to figure out some of the opportunities, potentials and, of course,
difficulties by considering spirituality in urban development.
2
What is TRIALOG?
TRIALOG is:
• A journal for architects, planners, sociologists, geographers, economists and development
planners.
• A journal for the exchange of professional experience in the field of urban development in the
Third World.
• A journal for the presentation and discussion of new research results and for the discussion of
recent concepts of development policies for urban change.
• A journal of free discussions, of work reports and of documentation of alternative approaches.
The thematic range of TRIALOG includes among other related topics: urbanization and housing
policy/ architecture and regional cultures/ecology, technological transfer and appropriate
technologies/rural development strategies.
Each issue will be peer-reviewed.
TRIALOG is a quarterly journal published in Germany. The journal recently celebrated the 25th
anniversary with its 100th Issue.
The last issues were on
• 102/103 (3/09 4/09) Redefining the Urban
• 101 (2/09) Borders and Migration
• 100 (2/09) Urban Visions
• 99 (1/09) East Africa
• 98 (3/08) Forced Evictions
• 97 (2/08) Es wandelt sich
• 95/96 (4/07 1/08) Think future
• 94 (3/07) Housing Policies
• 93 (1/07) Imposing European Urban Structures
• 92 (1/07) Megacities
• 91 (4/06) Building on Disasters
• 90 (3/06) Urban Coalitions
• 89 (2/06) Controlling Urban Space
• 88 (1/06) Afghanistan
• 87 (4/05) Violence and Insecurity in Cities
3
Diagrams and other graphs should be part of the text. We will convert them into the correct format
during editing.
References: In the text please use the following format for quotations:
“The cities are growing” (Name Year: page number) example: “the cities are growing” (Scholz 2008:
68)
for not direct quotations use: (see Scholz 2008: 23)
At the end of the article please list your references in alphabetical order like
Name (year): Title. Location of publisher.
Example:
Scholz, Wolfgang (2008): The African City. Nairobi.
If you quote an article or a chapter in a book by other editors:
Scholz, Wolfgang: The African City. In: Wemhöner, Antje (ed.) (2008): The City. Nairobi.
For photographs or other graphs:
Fig. 1 or table 1: Title
Then the graphic itself
Source: Scholz 2008
Example:
Fig 1. Urban growth of Dar es Salaam
Source: John Briggs, University of Glasgow and Davis Mwamfupe, University of Dar es Salaam. Cartography by Mike Shand,
University of Glasgow.
The selection of papers will take place in March. By the end of March you will be informed about the
decision.