Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
GENOCIDE
http://krishk.com
THE GOD OF THE OLD TESTAMENT IS ARGUABLY THE MOST
UNPLEASANT CHARACTER IN ALL FICTION:
JEALOUS AND PROUD OF IT; A PETTY, UNJUST, UNFORGIVING
CONTROL-FREAK, A VINDICTIVE, BLOOD THIRSTY ETHNIC
CLEANSER; A MYSOGYNISTIC, HOMOPHOBIC, RACIST,
INFANTICIDAL, GENOCIDAL, FILLICIDAL, PESTILENTIAL,
MEGALOMANIAC, SADOMASOCHISTIC, CAPRICIOUSLY
MALEVOLENT BULLY.
THEOLOGICAL
HISTORICAL
ETHICAL
THEOLIGICAL RESPONSE
AFFIRMATIONS
THEOLOGICAL
HISTORICAL
ETHICAL
HISTORICAL RESPONSE
GARRISONS
This stereotypical ancient Near East language of “all” people describes attacks on
what turn out to be military forts or garrisons containing combatants — not a
general population that includes women and children. We have no archaeological
evidence of civilian populations at Jericho or Ai (6:21; 8:25).8 The word “city [‘ir]”
during this time in Canaan was where the (military) king, the army, and the
priesthood resided. So for Joshua, mentioning “women” and “young and old” turns
out to be stock ancient Near East language that he could have used even if
“women” and “young and old” were not living there. The language of “all” (“men and
women”) at Jericho and Ai is a “stereotypical expression for the destruction of all
human life in the fort, presumably composed entirely of combatants.”9 The text does
not require that “women” and “young and old” must have been in these cities — and
this same situation could apply to Saul’s battling against the amalekites.
HISTORICAL RESPONSE
GARRISONS
Jericho was a small settlement of probably 100 or fewer soldiers. This is why all of Israel
could circle it seven times and then do battle against it on the same day! Also, we
should keep in mind that the large numbers used in warfare accounts in the Old
Testament are a little tricky; they simply may not be as high as our translations indicate.
The Hebrew word ‘eleph (commonly rendered, “thousand”) can also mean “unit” or
“squad” without specifying the exact number.
HISTORICAL RESPONSE
LIMITS
God prohibited Israel from conquering other neighboring nations — Moab
and Ammon (Deuteronomy 2:9,19) as well as Edom (Deuteronomy 2:4;
23:7) — despite the fact Edom had earlier refused to assist the Israelites
(Numbers 20:14–21; cp. Deuteronomy 2:6–8). So, God did not permit land
grabbing, and Israel had no right to conquer beyond what God had
sanctioned.
THEOLOGICAL
HISTORICAL
ETHICAL
ETHICAL RESPONSE