S atanic network

M y old best-friend Doug would say i'm being paranoid delusional with the following but i have
no alternative explanation other than outright apathy. But even t hat does not explain the
consistent rejection and dismissal of editors and key readers of people/organizations who should,
by their stated goals/objectives/values, be fast allies. The almighty Buck (dollar) is t heir god.
They seem to be more interested in scamming the public to believe their twisted 'truth' / view of
reality. It's Satanic.

Tim Rifat would have you believe only his cryst als have the pow er to rid you of demons /Satanic
influence but doesn't that remind you of 'famous last words'? False prophet.Satanic payroll.

Jay Weidner would normally sound less ext reme and more interes ted in 'revealing t he Truth' but
quite recently, he's endors ed Tim s o i have no choice but to label: false prophet . Satanic payroll.

David Icke is also endorsed by Jay but more so than Tim. They've made a video together
discussing 'revelations', 'truth', and more so again: false prophet. Satanic payroll.

Rael is the founder of a new religion called the Raelian Religion. It's 'alien' based, pushes human
cloning, and 'genius' leadership (based on IQ). Now i'm not necessarily against human cloning (i
figure if you have the resources to clone yourself, why automatically restrict your DNA in the
gene-pool?) But i am against using cloning for military purposes, automatically assuming
'geniuses' w ill be bett er leaders (high IQ does not guarantee good leaders hip qualities), and t he
assumption powerful aliens have affiliated themselves with Rael exclusively. It's questionable at
least. Scammer. False prophet. Satanic payroll.

Riley would have you believe the 'end of t he w orld' will happen around 2012. H e's selling tickets ,
in the form of one-page artwork, to willing 'passengers'. Those will be space-lifted, before the
tumultuous end, to s afety. 8| And i have some swampland in Florida you also might be int erested
in. GM AFB. (Love the guy but..) Scammer. False prophet.Satanic payroll.

Noetic Instituteshould be a place w here i can publish my writ ings .. But an editor there recently
rejected my writings without the common decency of reading them. They'll publish you if you
have a PhD following your name and you endorse conventional idiotic dogma (such as the
Standard M odel in physics).8| The fact the Standard M odel is Satanically inspired and they reject
outright publishing the War for M eaning (a fight against Satan) indicates to me: Satanic payroll.

Physics departmentsacross the world are refuges for the Standard M odel and Satanic infiltration.
It sounds crazy, delusional, paranoid,.. but the simple t ruth of the matt er is : the St andard M odel
(the conventionally accepted model of particles and interactions) is essentially Satanically
inspired. It draws us away from God; it separates us from God; it alienates us from God. With the
Standard M odel and quantum cosmology, we don't need God to explain anything! The upthrust,
the outcome, is denial of God.

Typically evolution and biology departments are targeted by fundamentalist Christian groups as
'sanctuaries of evil'. i think of evolution as a God-guided process to create (apparently) intelligent
life. ;) So i don't 'jump on the bandwagon' dismis sing all science to be corrupt ed by Satan: jus t
physics through the Standard M odel.
What i propose as alternative is the divinely inspired Other M odel. God is core t o this model and
because critical features have engineered characteristics, i d educe our Grand Lady is actually a
sophisticated Engineer beyond comparison. :) So the Other M odel recognizes Her as Author of
our universe. :)

The Other M odel equally explains all features of physical nature but without dependency on
virtual (unreal) particles. It proposes a unified framework of real part icles and interact ions based
on two things: charged anti-photons and curved space-time. These are minimally sufficient to
explain electromagnetism, gravitation, gravitational time-dilation, strong force, and relativistic
effects integrally. The Other M odel is distinctly testable (otherwise it would not be part of
science).

The Other M odel was arrived at through divine inspiration, has G od at its core, deduces some
properties of God, and above all - recognizes God as Creator, integral to creation and life.

.. For 30-odd years i have s tudied physics and engineering independent ly, formally, and
informally .. i have approached all those listed above humbly, respectfully,.. giving them a
chance to interact with me humbly, respectfully,.. but most of the t ime - all i get is - "dead air"
(indifference, apathy,..) And why should they care? They're busy pushing some agenda,product ,
service, or w orld-view .. Physicis ts mostly care about job-securit y - like anybody els e .. Why
should they care when i affront their world-view, their Standard M odel .. i know i cannot expect
anyone to care .. But they should give the courtesy to listen/read (instead of casually dismiss as
the Noetic Institute does). Doug tells me "why should they even listen?" The Other M odel does
not reinforce their position; it does not increase their job-security; there's no motivation (other
than respect for science) for them to listen .. But we have come to a crossroads in physics:1.
promote the faltering status quo 2.examine viable alternatives . D on't w e have an obligation as
true scientists t o examine viable alternatives especially when the Standard M odel is nigh
catastrophic failure? We need to r es pect science by thoroughly examining viable alternatives
when conditions dictate/indicate there is a need. Now is such a critical time; now is when we
need to thoroughly examine viable alternatives and the Other M odel is one.

Is the world-view i push so bereft of value? So tasteless, so low-class, so insane, so based on

paranoid delusion that no conventional physicist can dedicate a few moments of their time to
seriously consider it? It can't be about meaning because the world-view promotes the most
meaningful future i can envision .. Perhaps some of the indifference 'directed at me' (the lack of
response to my attempts to interact) is rooted in class. i'ma middle-class boy from a mundane
social circle; there's nothing royal/special about my lineage. i'm certainly not part of any elite
group but 'my ideas' are more revolut ionary than Chris t's were in Rome: God is personal
empowerment; She is your personal Liberator; and, She can be your Inspiration .. i have
approached churches (my mother's Catholic church) and the Pope .. But my ideas are 'more than
Christian' (more than just forgiveness - for self and others..): it's about God as Spouse (Wife /
Husband) .. Yui laughs at this - how can an entity be husband/wife to multitudes all at the same
time for every person in history? i reply: "not just humans but whales, dolphins, and any creatures
(artificial / natural) that have a certain level of awareness", but people just don't get it (or want to
'get it'). God is Love. God is Empowerment. God is Inspiration.A ll (good) things are possible
with God.
How can you explain to a blind person (someone blind from birth) w hat it's like to see/meet a
woman who inspires you . Your heart pounds, just to be near them, your mind goes 'out t he
window', you stutter,s tammer, they brush agains t you, your heart skips a beat,.. And you see all
of this (even your own idiocy) with your own eyes: your body,he t nose bet ween your eyes, your
shoulders, the arms hanging down from them,.. All of these visual perceptions validate your
impression: you're crazy about them. You know you exist and they are the center of your
universe; they ar e your universe. It's the same as trying to describe to someone who's never fallen
in love; they can't relat e; they can't unders tand; they can't connect t o the concept..Bot h Doug and
Yui cannot relate because both are non-s pirit ual. Even my mother cannot relate becaus e she can
only connect to God through Jesus and M ary .. We all see God how we need/want to see Her .. In
this sense, i must respect everyone's need but i als o mus t res pect Her and Her singular need to be
acknowledged. The only way for me to reconcile this is with/through these essays ..

So it's more than just the Other M odel i push, more than jus t a world-view, more than a novel
relationship to God,.. i myself Hate to label for two reasons: i was labeled most of my childhood
and younger years and raised/educated against labeling. So i must apologize for labeling those
above as being on the Satanic payroll. S omewhat in jest and somew hat in earnest i did that .. But
how can i reconcile world-views that don't seem to jive with the one that accompanies the Other
M odel? If someone is pushing crystals, 't ruth' you must pay for,membership in a religion
(declared or not), or the obviously faltering Standard M odel, do i idly stand by while they
increase their own personal wealth at the 'unforgivable' price of human hope?

i have a moral obligation to raise awareness, l et people know about the Other M odel (at the same
time, the deficiencies/dangers of the Standard M odel), and point out when others exploit human
hopes for personal gain. Riley does this with his 't ickets', Rael with his 'religion', David, Jay, and
Tim - with their version of 'the truth', the Noetic 'institute' and all university physics departments
with their pushing of the Standard M odel. It's a scam; it's deception; and it's wrong.

.. i don't question the physics (of the Ot her Model - how can i quest ion divine ins piration?), but i
wonder about human willingness to listen, have the patience required, and care about waste of
hope, inspiration, creativity,..on projects as sociated with 'vindicating' the faltering St andard
M odel .. Can we afford to throw away hope? Inspiration? Creativity? On something
fundamentally wrong? .. A ll i know is it's Sin for me to s it idly by while my brothers , sist ers, and
their children get deceived/scammed by artful con-artists.. Sin.. And so i write, i hope, and i
pray..