Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
HONR 175.10
Past Time paper
September 9, 2009
Jules Tygiel sets out to show in his book Past Time: Baseball as History that the history
of baseball in America has experienced dramatic changes and developments from the mid 19th
century to the 21st century, and these have influenced the levels of involvement and differing
reactions of society in different eras. The book, according to Tygiel, is about history, not
baseball, but his idea is to present to us how the two are intertwined (Past Time ix). It is
important to note, Tygeiel tells us, that baseball itself as a game has not changed very much since
its creation but that the context or climate in which it has been played has varied dramatically
from its first years to the modern day (x). Sport is a reflection of the society in which it is
contained; therefore, as American society developed, expanded, changed, got broken down and
built back up, the game of baseball was always there but it served different purposes for the
American people and also reflected the changes of society in the “format in which Americans
Tygiel does a good job of showing how the climate of the nation allowed for baseball’s
acceptance as the national pastime. He tells us that, “the spread of the railroad and telegraph
facilitated the spread of ideas and activities” across the nation (11). This new national culture
was the environment in which baseball was adopted and helped to popularize the game.
Additionally, Tygiel dimisses the idea that baseball was suited to the American character at the
time, contending that in actuality the men who influenced the sport “embraced the modern,
rational, scientific worldview that had grown prevalent in mid-nineteenth-century America” (11).
He also talks about the state of the nation pre-Civil War, saying that the union was not complete,
which allowed for baseball’s national identity to be welcomed (7). Tygiel contextualizes baseball
in chapter one well, and shows that technology like the telegraph and railroad helped to create its
national appeal.
Chapter 2 shows the development of statistics in the game brought about by Henry
Chadwick. Since almanacs and statistical manuals were gaining popularity in the antebellum
period as part of the rise in “quantification,” this opened the door for Chadwick to create part of
modern baseball (20). Tygiel shows the environment in which Chadwick’s ideas were presented
and how they progressed and eventually came to forge the structure for statistics in baseball. The
chapter delves into Chadwick’s life all the way until his death, which does necessarily support
his thesis in any way, but rounds out the narrative of the section.
In a time when unionization and workers rights were at the center of the national
conversation, the era that concerns Chapter 3, baseball’s structure and managerial practices
reflected that of the large corporations whose employees wished to unionize against. “Charles
Comiskey, Connie Mack, and Clark Griffith each an owner of an American league franchise, and
John McGraw, who had left the ownership ranks, epitomized the promise of a nation” (35).
These men, as players, were key in the fight against owner exploitation. Yet, once they came to
power as “magnates,” they exploited their own players just as much if not more than they
experienced earlier. Comiskey’s White Sox threw the 1919 World Series mostly out of
resentment for the treatment they had received by the management in the same way workers
While it is easy to make the comparison of the players to workers and owners to business
barons, Tygiel does not directly draw upon the parallel. He could have easily placed these events
within the broader context of the American labor movement but does not do so successfully. In
this chapter he fails to show that Americans appreciated baseball in a different way.. He could
have pointed to the many strikes of 1919 that dovetail with the Black Sox scandal. He could have
pointed out that baseball was reconfiguring its structure in the early 20th century as it went
though several different leagues until settling on the modern format, just as many American
corporations reorganized as antitrust laws and labor unions forced structural changes; yet, he
does not. It would serve this section better to have played up the similarities between the
everyday American and the ball player to show how the game was reflecting the changes in
society.
communication were among the most important advancements of the day. The radio broadcast of
the 1922 World Series, as well as the later development of the motion picture, shows that the
development of society has influenced how Americans interact with baseball, as they can now
hear the game live or watch clips later as opposed to viewing a visual representation on a lit
scoreboard in a town square. We can clearly see how people have begun to interact with the sport
in different ways and now have the choice of mediums through which to experience a game.
Through the development of radio broadcasting baseball games, we can see the overall
development of the radio as a medium, as well as the shift from the communal act of watching a
scoreboard light up in the town center to listening to an announcer give a dynamic play-by-play
in the comfort of your own home. We also see the development of photographs, tabloid papers,
and newsreels as additional means of seeing baseball. Additionally, Tygiel examines the nation’s
obsession with Babe Ruth, who crossed over to Hollywood and radio on several occasions, and
gives insight into American society at the time. For many, Ruth was “an unequaled exhibition
whose strength and accuracy with baseball were of a pace with the madness for crazy pleasure,
unheard of speed, and aimless bigness convulsing the nation” (75). Tygiel shows how the
different medium that arose during the 1920s influenced the game, and also how the game
influenced them.
The Negro Leagues are examined in Chapter 6, a well thought out and executed section
of the book. He accounts for the successes and hardships that came with the league and its
eventual end. He sets the Leagues well in context of Jim Crow America. Chapter 7 gives us a
look at the Giants Dodgers 1951 World Series and the development and impact of television on
the game. In this chapter, Tygiel shows the impact TV has, which is very unlike the impact of
radio, on ticket sales and how franchises must adapt to continue to be successful. Chapter 8 we
see the expansion of baseball that made it truly America’s game. Developments in transportation
and communication made it feasible for teams to play across the country
In these chapters, however, Tygiel does not mention many key world events or
developments. He does include some aspects of the civil rights movement as they pertain to the
integration of baseball but he does not mention the integration of the US Armed Forces just one
year after Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier, nor many of the other Civil Rights gains made
in the 1950s. In the 1960s, Tygiel fails to mention events that have dramatically shaped modern
American culture, like the assassination of President John F. Kennedy or the conflicts in
Vietnam. These events, while not always directly pertaining to baseball, affected society in major
and visible ways, and therefore, would affect the sports that reflect that society. He tells us a bit
about the nostalgia for the 1960s that occurs during the 1980s with baseball films but does not
nation and the sport that adapted to and reflected this progress. He looks at the state of the nation
and the changing interactions between society and baseball. However, this book lacks accounts
for many different groups of people that are constitute America. My biggest problem is that he, is
missing some important actors, in addition to major events, within the history of baseball and the
United States. He does not consider, beyond the Negro Leagues, who else was excluded from
Major League baseball—namely women with the large exception of the All-American girls,
which he does not mention. In Chapters 6 and 7, Tygiel has the opportunity to do so but does not
even touch upon them. His history proves to be largely concerning men, even when speaking
about modern baseball. He does not touch upon female fans, nor girls playing Little League or
having a catch with their fathers. There are other groups to be considered as well, what about the
lack of Asian players and the emergence of Hispanic players? While he does not claim to explain
or examine who was playing baseball and why, that is an important part of the game and
America’s history: the social changes that allowed for more diversity in the mainstream,
including baseball, is a reflection of a changing American ideals. Tygiel successfully proves that
baseball will adjust and continue to flourish no matter the developments that occur in the United
States but he failed to show one of the biggest adaptations, the creation of the All-American
Girls League, as well as added diversity of players in the more recent decades.