21720 HRM

PRESENTATION - ASSESSMENT SHEET

DATE: ……………………………………………….

TOPIC: ……………………………………………….

GROUP MEMBERS:
STUDENT NAME: _____________________________ID:___________________
STUDENT NAME: _____________________________ID: _________________
STUDENT NAME: _____________________________ID:_________________
STUDENT NAME: _____________________________ID:_________________
STUDENT NAME: _____________________________ID:__________________

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA: : (Assessment worth 25%)

FEEDBACK RATING SCALE Not Needs much Needs Satisfactory Good Very Good
Done more work more work
0 1 2 3 4
PREPARATION= 5%
Organisation, set-up,
cohesiveness
Contribution by all group
members
Use of visual / teaching aids
Quality of handouts
CONTENT= 5%
Introducing the topic;
Summary of key issues; Level of
critical analysis (not just
descriptive)
Identification of linkages to
relevant theory
Insight and originality

Analysis=5%Explanation of the
contribution to good corporate
governance and ethical behaviour
CASE STUDY= 10%
Interesting & appropriate case
study
Ability to lead discussions
Answering questions
appropriately
Interest generated amongst class
members and class involvement
Grade out of 25% =
Grade as a Percentage =
 UTS School of Management
HRM Portfolio: ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK SHEET

STUDENT NAME: ____________________________ STUDENT ID _________________

ASSESSMENT MARK: (Assessment worth 45%)

FEEDBACK RATING Not Needs Needs Satisfactory Good Very

SCALE Done much some Good
more more
work work
0 1 2 3 4 5
Presentation:
Structure, framework,
methodology: sections clearly
presented and organised;
Spelling, grammar, syntax, style
& bibliography
Introductory Section:
Clear identification of the
focus & purpose of the
Portfolio
A job description for the
position:
Recruitment procedures:
Selection procedures
Evaluation of support
group contribution:
Evaluation of the
contribution of each
particular HRM function
to good corporate
governance:
*Linkages between each
particular function and the
overall HR strategy
*Use of relevant theory in
establishing the rationale for
decisions:
*Referencing to appropriate
literature throughout the
portfolio & Bibliography
Grade out of 45:
Grade as a percentage
Note: In evaluating each of these sections the following criteria will be applied:
Linkages between each particular function and the overall HR strategy
Use of relevant theory in establishing the rationale for decisions
Referencing to appropriate literature throughout the portfolio & Bibliography